Abstract
The biotinylated c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP conjugates 10a/b were synthesized by a straightforward set of procedures from standard, commercially available phosphoramidites. Their availability should allow isolation and characterization of new protein and RNA receptors for these key bacterial signaling molecules.
INTRODUCTION
The bacterial signaling molecules cyclic diguanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP, 6a) and cyclic diadenosine monophosphate (c-di-AMP, 6b) are both key second messengers.1, 2 c-di-GMP has received significant attention as recent research has begun to elucidate its complex, multi-faceted role in facilitating a rapid response to environmental cues by regulating biofilm formation as well as expression of virulence factors.3–8 Of several identified protein receptors for c-di-GMP, the best studied is the PilZ domain,3, 4, 9 to which it can bind as either a monomer or a self-intercalated dimer.10 In addition, c-di-GMP can bind to two different classes of riboswitch, which are noncoding regulatory mRNA domains.11–17 c-di-AMP has only recently been discovered in bacteria, where it serves as a signal to help regulate cell wall synthesis and cell division, including sporulation.18–21 In addition, although neither c-di-GMP nor c-di-AMP functions as a second messenger in eukaryotes, they both are known to trigger an innate immune response in infected hosts.22, 23 A mouse transmembrane protein named STING in the innate immune sensing pathway has recently been identified as a specific receptor for cyclic dinucleotides.24 Because of their critical functions in essential bacterial pathways, c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP clearly have major implications for human health. However, in spite of advances in the identification of proteins and RNA to which c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP bind, a great many additional receptors remain unknown.25 Biotinylated analogs of c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP should prove to be valuable tools for detection of crucial new receptors.
We recently reported a one-flask, gram-scale synthesis for c-di-GMP and its hydrolysis-resistant [Rp,Rp] and [Rp,Sp] dithiophosphate analogs.26 In addition, we have described their concentration- and metal-dependent polymorphism, demonstrating that they can associate to form not only self-intercalated dimers, but also higher order guanine quartet assemblies.27–29
We now present a straightforward approach for attaching hexynyl phosphoramidite to the 2'-OH of an intermediate readily available from our method. The resulting alkyne, once fully deprotected, can then be conjugated to a biotinylated azide using click chemistry30–32 to give 2'-biotinylated c-di-GMP, 10a. We also describe the preparation of c-di-AMP, 6b, as well as its biotinylated conjugate, 10b, by the same procedures used for c-di-GMP. Beaucage has recently reported a method to synthesize a different 2'-biotinylated c-di-GMP, starting with 2'-propargylated protected guanosine.33 Their conjugate differs in having a single methylene between the 2'-oxygen and the triazole ring formed by a click reaction. In contrast, 10a/10b has a charged phosphate and a (CH2)4 tether to the triazole. In addition, Sintin has very recently described the reduced binding to several protein and RNA receptors of yet a third 2'-biotinylated c-di-GMP, which has a carbamate connection between the 2'-oxygen and a biotinylated linker.34 The net favorabilities of the many interactions involved in the binding of these biotinylated conjugates to a wide range of receptors are difficult to predict. Therefore, the availability of a variety of different biotinylated c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP conjugates should prove useful for isolation and identification of new receptors.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
General Methods
5'-Hexyn-1-yl-(2-cyanoethyl)-(N,N-diisopropyl)-phosphoramidite and N-biotin-2-aminoethyl-diethyleneglycolyl-ethyl azide were purchased from Glen Research. CuBr and tris((1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)amine (TBTA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The DMSO and tert-BuOH used in the click reactions were both anhydrous. Benzoyl adenosine phosphoramidite was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific.
Analytical RP HPLC was performed on a Waters 2960 system with an Atlantis C18 column, 100 , 4.6 mm × 50 mm, 3 μm, using gradients of CH3CN and 0.1M aq Et3NHOAc (TEAA) (pH 6.8) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. ESI-MS was acquired in negative mode using a Waters Micromass single quadrupole LCZ system. Normal phase purifications were done on disposable Varian SuperFlash SF25 cartridges at 10 mL/min. Semi-preparative RP HPLC purifications were performed on a Waters Novapak C18 19 × 300 mm column, using gradients of CH3CN and 0.1 M aq NH4HCO3 (pH 6.8) at 6 mL/min. Li+ salts were obtained by passing samples through a small column (1.5 cm diameter) containing ~1 mL of AG 50W-X2 sulfonic acid resin, which had been converted to its Li+ form using LiOH.
Maximum UV absorbances were determined at 25 °C in the solvent indicated on an Aviv 14DS UV/VIS spectrophotometer. Molar extinction coefficients, ε, were determined by dissolving a known mass of a lyophilized or precipitated sample in water in a volumetric flask, and measuring the absorbances of four diluted portions at 25 °C using different path length cells. The slope of a plot of absorbance/path length vs concentration gave the value of ε. Masses for these molar extinction coefficient determinations, as well as for the final yields of 9a/b and 10a/b, were determined in Corning centrifuge tubes exposed to an anti-static U-electrode before weighing.
All NMR spectra were acquired on a Varian VNMRS 500 MHz spectrometer at 25 °C in the solvents specified. Samples were heated to 50 °C for ten min prior to acquisition. The 1H and 13C spectra in d6-DMSO were referenced to that solvent, while those in D2O were referenced indirectly to 3-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propane-sulfonic acid, sodium salt. The 1H spectra in D2O were acquired with frequency presaturation for water suppression, and therefore the resonances adjacent to 4.8 ppm are diminished. The 31P spectra were referenced indirectly to neat phosphoric acid.
One-flask synthesis of 4a
A portion of 4a was prepared following our previously published procedure,26 starting with 3.00 mmol of 1a. Both diastereomers of 4a were purified together on 80 g of silica gel, using a gradient of 0 to 25% CH3OH in CH2Cl2, to give 1.615 g of 4a (1.36 mmol, 45% from 1a), which was characterized as follows: m/z (M-H) 1110 (calculated for C43H66N11O16P2Si2−: 1110); UV (CH3OH) λmax 255 nm; 1H NMR (d6-DMSO): δ(extra resonances indicate aggregation) 12.22 – 11.61 (8s, 8H), 8.39 – 8.17 (4s, 4H), 7.79 (br, 3H), 6.03 – 5.85 (4d, 4H), 5.32 – 4.02 (m, 20H), 3.03 – 2.67 (m, 8H), 1.22 – 1.06 (m, 37H), 0.87 – 0.65 (4s, 36H), 0.10 – −0.15 (8s, 24H); 13C NMR (d6-DMSO) 25 °C: δ 180.2, 180.0, 154.8, 154.7, 149.2, 148.8, 148.4, 148.2, 120.7, 119.8, 119.7, 118.0, 117.9, 86.4, 86.3, 85.1, 84.8, 83.9, 80.4, 72.4, 62.9, 62.8, 62.7, 56.0, 54.8, 51.0, 46.2, 34.9, 34.8, 34.7, 34.6, 27.1, 25.8, 25.4, 25.3, 18.9, 18.8, 18.7, 17.8, 17.7, 17.5, −3.2, −4.9, −5.1, −5.2, −5.5, −5.6, −5.8; 31P NMR (d6-DMSO) 25°C: δ (extra resonances indicate aggregation) 1.40, 1.26, 0.91, −2.34.
Monodesilylation to give 7a
To a portion of 4a (0.795 g, 0.671 mmol) in a 50 mL plastic centrifuge tube with a short stir bar was added 18 mL of dry CH3CN. To the stirring suspension was added pyridine•HF (0.128 mL, 4.93 mmol, 7.3 equiv). The mixture was stirred for 18 h. The stir bar was removed, silica gel (100 mg) was added, and the tube was shaken for 30 min to consume excess F−. The mixture was filtered through a sintered glass funnel, and the silica gel washed 4× with 6 mL portions of 20% CH3OH in CH2Cl2. The filtrate was concentrated to about 1 mL (not dryness), and 3 mL of CH2Cl2 was added. This mixture was purified on 60 g of silica gel, using a gradient of 2 to 30% CH3OH in CH2Cl2, to give 0.211 g of nearly pure 7a as a mixture of four isomers, m/z (M-H) 996 (calculated for C37H52N11O16P2Si−: 996), and 0.313 g of recovered 4a. This 7a was used as follows without further purification.
Coupling to give protected dimer alkyne, 8a
To 7a (0.211 g) from above in a 100 mL RBF with a stir bar was added pyridinium trifluroacetate (0.485 g, 2.51 mmol, 3 equiv rel to amidite). The mixture was dried 3× by evaporation of CH3CN, never letting it go dry, and ending with ~3 mL. The flask was sealed with a septum, then evacuated and refilled 10× with dry N2. 5'-Hexyn-1-yl-(2-cyanoethyl)-(N,N-diisopropyl)-phosphoramidite (0.25 g, 0.838 mmol, ~4.6 equiv) in a sealed bottle was dissolved by addition of 1.5 mL of dry CH3CN through the septum, and the contents were then transferred to the flask. The solution was stirred for 30 min, and 5.5 M tert-butyl hydroperoxide (0.46 mL, 2.51 mmol, 3 equiv rel to amidite) was added. The solution was stirred for 30 min, then concentrated and purified on 40 g of silica gel, using a gradient of 0 to 20% CH3OH in CH2Cl2, to give 0.170 g of nearly pure 8a as a mixture of eight isomers. This 8a was used as follows without further purification.
Deprotection to give dimer alkyne, 9a
To 8a (0.170 g) from above in a 100 mL RBF with a stir bar was added 10 mL (80 mmol, ~300 equiv rel to each ib) of CH3NH2 in anhydrous EtOH (33% by weight). After 3 h, the mixture was concentrated to dryness. Pyridine (3 mL) and Et3N (2 mL) were added and the mixture was concentrated to an oil. This process was repeated two more times to convert the tert-BuNH3+ to the Et3NH+ salt. Pyridine (2 mL) was added and the flask with a vent needle was placed in an oil bath at 55 °C, and the contents stirred for 5 min. Et3N (1.4 mL) and Et3N•3HF (0.8 mL, 14.7 mmol F−, ~110 equiv) were added simultaneously through separate syringes. Caution, HF: rinse all needles, syringes, septa, etc with aq K2CO3 before discarding. The solution was stirred for 1h, with occasional swirling. The flask was then removed from the oil bath and placed on a different stir plate. HPLC grade acetone (25 mL) was added in a slow stream over 1 min, and the resulting suspension of white solid was stirred for 15 min. The product was collected by filtration in a sintered glass funnel, washed 3× with 5 mL of acetone, and dried in a desiccator overnight over KOH. The product was then dissolved in 2 mL of 0.1 M NH4HCO3 and purified by semi-preparative RP chromatography, using a gradient of 2 to 40% CH3CN in 0.1 M NH4HCO3, to give pure 9a (0.0445 g) as primarily the Et3NH+ salt.
Another portion of 9a was prepared from 4a by the same method and was then converted to the Li+ salt. This second portion, 9a, Li+ (0.0344 g, 0.0396 mmol), was used to determine a molar extinction coefficient of 22,700 OD M−1 cm−1. Assuming that 9a, Et3NH+ and 9a, Li+ have the same extinction coefficient, the original preparation of 9a, Et3NH+ was determined by UV to be 0.0500 mmol, 12% from 4a, taking into account the recovered 4a from the monodesilylation step. The Li+ salt of 9a was characterized as follows: m/z (M-H) 849 (calculated for C26H32N10O17P3−: 849); UV (H2O) λmax 253 nm, ε = 22,700 OD M−1 cm−1; 1H NMR (D2O): δ 7.99 (s, 1H) 7.98 (s, 1H), 5.93 (s, 1H), 5.70 (s, 1H), 5.33 – 5.27 (m, 1H), 5.12 – 5.00 (m, 2H), 4.41 – 4.25 (m, 4H), 3.99 – 3.84 (m, 4H), 2.17 – 2.06 (m, 3H), 1.66 – 1.56 (m, 2H), 1.52 – 1.41 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (D2O): δ 158.8, 158.6, 156.5, 156.4, 152.2, 151.5, 139.3, 138.7, 116.6, 116.3, 93.2, 91.4, 88.6, 83.2, 82.9, 78.4, 75.7, 72.6, 71.9, 71.7, 68.7, 64.8, 64.6, 31.6, 31.5, 26.8; 31P NMR (D2O): δ 0.14, −0.47, −1.17.
Click conjugation to give biotinylated c-di-GMP, 10a
A portion of 9a, Et3NH+ (0.0160 mmol determined by UV) was lyophilized in a 15 mL centrifuge tube. The tube was evacuated and refilled 10× with Ar in a small desiccator. A 3:1 mixture of DMSO:tert-BuOH (2.0 mL) was added by syringe to a 0.025 mmol sealed bottle of N-biotin-2-aminoethyl-diethyleneglycolyl-ethyl azide to make a 0.0125 M solution. This entire solution was transferred by syringe to the lyophilized 9a, and the mixture was vortexed until it all dissolved. CuBr (0.0092 g, 0.064 mmol, 4 equiv rel to 9a) was weighed into a 15 mL centrifuge tube pre-filled with Ar. A 3:1 mixture of DMSO:tert-BuOH (0.94 mL) was added to a 50 mg bottle of tris((1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)amine (TBTA, 0.0942 mmol, 1.47 equiv rel to CuBr) to make a 0.10 M solution. The bottle was evacuated and refilled 10× with Ar, and the solution was then transferred by syringe to the tube of CuBr. This tube was vortexed, then evacuated and refilled 10× with Ar. The CuBr/TBTA solution was transferred using a glass pipet under a flow of Ar to the tube containing 9a/azide. This final tube was vortexed and left at room temperature.
After 20 h, a thick suspension of Amberlyte CG50 anion exchange resin was prepared in 3:1 DMSO:tert-BuOH, and ~2 mL (3.0 meq) was added to the tube containing crude 10a, which was shaken for 1h. Another 2 mL portion of the resin suspension was placed in a small column (1.5 cm diameter) and allowed to drain. The reaction mixture was then applied to this column and collected in a 50 mL centrifuge tube. The column was washed 15× with 1mL portions of H2O. The collected solution was divided among four 50 mL centrifuge tubes, diluted further with water, and lyophilized. Water (1 mL) was added to one of the tubes, the solid was scraped from the walls of the tube with a spatula, and the mixture was transferred in turn to each of the other tubes, with scraping. The final mixture was filtered through a 25 mm × 0.45 μm filter into a new 50 mL centrifuge tube. The original tubes were rinsed and scraped sequentially 10× with 1 mL portions of H2O, with each rinse filtered. The solution of crude 10a in the final tube was lyophilized.
Crude 10a was purified by semi-preparative RP chromatography to give pure 10a, primarily as the Et3NH+ salt. This product was converted to the Li+ salt, to give 10a, Li+ (0.00895 g, 0.00682 mmol, 43% from 9a), which was characterized as follows: m/z (M-H) 1293 (calculated for C44H64N16O22P3S−: 1293); UV (H2O) λmax 253 nm, ε = 18,100 OD M−1 cm−1; 1H NMR (D2O): δ 7.96 (s, 1H), 7.93 (s, 1H), 7.63 (s, 1H), 6.06 (s, 1H), 5.87 (s, 1H), 5.12 – 5.05 (m, 1H), 4.95 – 4.87 (m, 1H), 4.84 – 4.75 (s, 1H), 4.65 – 4.57 (m, 2H), 4.49 – 4.38 (m, 3H), 4.32 – 4.15 (m, 4H), 4.02 – 3.93 (m, 2H), 3.86 – 3.75 (m, 4H), 3.54 – 3.38 (m, 10H), 3.23 (t, J = 5 Hz, 2H), 3.15 – 3.07 (m, 2H), 2.82 (dd, J = 13 Hz, 5 Hz, 1H), 2.62 (d, J = 13 Hz, 1 H), 2.54 (t, J = 7 Hz, 1H), 2.10 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 1.61 – 1.33 (m, 8H), 1.27 – 1.15 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (D2O): δ 177.0, 165.5, 159.0, 154.1, 153.9, 148.5, 137.5, 123.5, 116.7, 116.3, 89.2, 87.7, 80.0, 76.1, 73.6, 71.0, 70.0, 69.9, 69.8, 69.7, 69.6, 69.0, 66.2, 62.2, 60.4, 55.5, 50.1, 39.9, 39.1, 39.0, 35.6, 29.4, 28.0, 27.9, 25.3, 24.3; 31P NMR (D2O): δ 0.29, −0.43, −0.92.
One-flask synthesis of 4b
A portion of adenosine phosphoramidite, 1b (2.57 g, 2.60 mmol, 1.3 equiv), was dried 3× by evaporation of 16 mL of dry CH3CN, the last time leaving 8 mL. Four 3Å molecular sieves were added. To a 2nd portion of 1b (1.98 g, 2.00 mmol) dissolved in 10 mL of CH3CN and water (0.072 mL, 4 mmol, 2 equiv) was added pyridinium trifluoroacetate (0.464 g, 2.4 mmol, 1.2 equiv). After 1 min, 10 mL of tert-BuNH2 was added. After another 10 min, the mixture was concentrated to a foam, the residue was dissolved in 20 mL of CH3CN, and concentrated again to a foam. This addition and concentration were repeated one more time. To the residue dissolved in 24 mL of CH2Cl2 was added H2O (0.360 mL, 20 mmol, 10 equiv), followed by 24 mL of 6% dichloroacetic acid (DCA, 17.6 mmol) in CH2Cl2. After 10 min, the reaction was quenched by addition of pyridine (2.8 mL, 35 mmol, 2 equiv rel to DCA). The mixture was then concentrated, and the residue was dissolved in 16 mL of CH3CN and concentrated again. This process was repeated two more times, the last time leaving 2b in 5 mL.
To the above solution of 2b was added the dried solution of 1b using a syringe with a bent needle (to access as much of the solution as possible). After 2 min, anhydrous tert-butyl hydroperoxide 5.5 M in decane (1.1 mL, 6 mmol, 3 equiv) was added. After 30 min, the solution was cooled in an ice bath, and 0.50 g of NaHSO3 dissolved in 1 mL H2O was added. The ice bath was immediately removed, the mixture was stirred for 5 min, and then concentrated to a small volume. The residual oil was dissolved in 32 mL of CH2Cl2, followed by addition of H2O (0.36 mL, 20 mmol, 10 equiv) and then 32 mL of 6% DCA (23 mmol) in CH2Cl2. After 10 min, the reaction was quenched with 20 mL of pyridine. The mixture was concentrated to a small volume, 60 mL more pyridine was added, and the solution was concentrated again, leaving 3b in 40 mL.
To the above solution of 3b was added 5,5-dimethyl-2-oxo-2-chloro-1,3,2-dioxaphosphinane (DMOCP, 1.36 g of 95% reagent, 7 mmol, 3.5 equiv). After 10 min, the reaction was quenched by addition of H2O (1.28 mL, 70 mmol, 10 equiv rel to DMOCP), and I2 (0.66 g, 2.6 mmol, 1.3 equiv) was added immediately. After 5 min, the mixture was poured into 280 mL of H2O containing 0.4 g NaHSO3. After 5 min of stirring, 8 g of NaHCO3 was slowly added. After 5 min more of stirring, the aqueous solution was partitioned with 320 mL 1:1 EtOAc:Et2O. The separated aqueous layer was then partitioned with an additional 80 mL of 1:1 EtOAc:Et2O. The organic layers were combined and concentrated to an oil, with excess pyridine removed by evaporation of three 15 mL portions of EtOAc.
The above oil was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and purified on 80 g of silica gel, using a gradient of 0 to 20% CH3OH in CH2Cl2. Pure fractions of both diastereomers were combined together, concentrated to a foam, and dried in a desiccator over KOH overnight, giving 4b (1.079 g, 0.884 mmol, 44% from 1b), which was characterized as follows: m/z (M-H) 1146 (calculated for C49H62N11O14P2Si2−: 1146; UV (CH3OH) λmax 280 nm; 1H NMR (d6-DMSO): δ (extra resonances indicate aggregation) 11.26 – 11.04 (4s, 4H), 8.85 – 8.54 (8s, 8H), 8.08 – 7.92 (m, 8H), 7.67 – 7.50 (m, 12H), 6.18 – 6.03 (4d, 4H), 5.37 – 4.08 (m, 20H), 3.04 – 2.82 (m, 4H), 1.16 – 0.98 (m, 13H), 0.86 – 0.71 (4s, 36H), 0.16 – −0.12 (8s, 24H); 13C NMR (d6-DMSO): δ 165.6, 151.8, 151.7, 151.3, 150.5, 150.4, 150.2, 142.7, 142.2, 133.3, 132.5, 129.1, 128.8, 128.5, 125.8, 125.5, 118.1, 118.0, 117.9, 88.3, 80.3, 74.9, 73.9, 73.2, 71.9, 71.4, 63.2, 63.1, 63.0, 62.9, 62.8, 62.7, 50.8, 46.0, 25.8, 25.7, 25.6, 25.5, 25.4, 19.1, 18.5, 18.4, 17.8, 17.6, 17.5, −3.2, −4.4, −5.0, −5.1, −5.2, −5.4, −5.5, −5.6; 31P NMR (d6-DMSO): δ (extra resonances indicate aggregation) 0.20, −0.08, −1.09, −2.81.
One-flask synthesis of 5b
Another portion of 4b was prepared from 1b as above on a 2.65 mmol scale. Instead of chromatography, one-half of the organic solution containing 4b was dissolved in 10 mL CH3CN and converted to 5b by addition of 10 mL of tert-BuNH2. After 10 min, the mixture was concentrated to a foam, the residue was dissolved in 10 mL of CH3CN, and concentrated again. This addition and concentration were repeated one more time. The residue was then dissolved in 10 mL of CH3OH, filtered, and concentrated to a foam. The product was crystallized by addition of 10 mL of CH2Cl2, collected by filtration, washed with minimal CH2Cl2, and dried in a desiccator over KOH overnight, giving pure 5b (0.467 g, 0.376 mmol, 28% from 1.32 mmol of 1b), which was characterized as follows: m/z (M-H) 1093 (calculated for C46H59N10O14P2Si2−: 1093); UV (CH3OH) λmax 280 nm; 1H NMR (d6-DMSO): δ 11.31 (br, 1H), 8.89 (s, 1H), 8.73 (s, 1H), 8.02, (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.64 – 7.58 (m, 1H), 7.49 (t, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 6.05 (s, 1H), 4.66 – 4.57 (m, 1H), 4.46 – 4.40 (m, 1H), 4.21 – 4.14 (m, 1H), 4.14 – 4.05 (m, 1H), 3.82 – 3.74 (m, 1H), 0.98 (s, 9H), 0.97 (s, 9H), 0.26 (s, 3H), 0.22 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (d6-DMSO): δ 165.5, 151.7, 151.3, 149.9, 141.5, 133.2, 132.4, 128.5, 128.3, 124.9, 89.7, 76.0, 74.5, 69.4, 61.5, 50.6, 26.8, 25.9, 17.9, −4.2, −5.1; 31P NMR (d6-DMSO): δ −3.08.
c-di-AMP, 6b
To a portion of 5b (0.443 g, 0.357 mmol) in a 250 mL RBF was added 25 mL of CH3NH2 in anhydrous EtOH (33% by weight, 200 mmol, 280 equiv rel to each benzoyl). After 1 h at room temperature, the mixture was concentrated to an oil, to which 3 mL of pyridine and 1 mL of Et3N were added. The mixture was concentrated to an oil, and this process was repeated two more times to convert the tert-BuNH3+ to the Et3NH+ salt. To the oil was added 10 mL of pyridine, and the flask with a vent needle was placed in an oil bath at 55 °C. Et3N (4.4 mL) and Et3N•3HF (2.6 mL, 48 mmol F−, 67 eq rel to each TBS) were added simultaneously through two syringes. Caution, HF: rinse all needles, syringes, septa, etc with aq K2CO3 before discarding. The mixture was swirled and then stirred at 55 °C. After 20 h, the flask was removed from the oil bath and placed on a different stir plate. HPLC grade acetone (200 ml) was immediately added in a slow stream over 1 min to the stirring mixture. After 10 min, the solid was collected by filtration, washed 5× with 5 mL portions of acetone, and dried in a desiccator over KOH overnight, giving pure 6b (0.247 g, 0.288 mmol, 81% from 5b, 23% from 1b), which was characterized as follows: mp 196–198 °C dec; m/z (M-H) 657 (calculated for C20H23N10O12P2−: 657); UV (CH3OH) λmax 258 nm, ε = 18,600 OD M−1 cm−1; 1H NMR (d6-DMSO): δ 8.22 (s, 1H), 7.82 (s, 1H), 5.99 (s, 1H), 4.83 – 4.72 (m), 4.67 – 4.65 (s), 4.43 – 4.34 (m, 2H), 4.07 – 3.97 (m, 1H), 3.05 (q, J = 7 Hz, 12H), 1.13 (t, J = 7 Hz, 18H); 13C NMR (d6-DMSO): δ 157.2, 154.7, 149.3, 141.0, 120.8, 92.7, 82.4, 76.4, 72.7, 64.9, 49.3, 10.8; 31P NMR (d6-DMSO): δ −0.83.
Monodesilylation to give 7b
To a portion of 4b (0.488 g, 0.400 mmol) in a 50 mL plastic centrifuge tube with a short stir bar was added 15 mL of dry CH3CN. To the stirring suspension was added pyridine•HF (0.160 mL, 6.16 mmol, 15.4 equiv). The mixture was stirred for 18 h. The stir bar was removed, silica gel (50 mg) was then added, and the tube was shaken for 30 min to consume excess F−. The mixture was filtered through a sintered glass funnel, and the silica gel washed 4× with 6 mL portions of 20% CH3OH in CH2Cl2. The filtrate was concentrated to about 10 mL, 5 mL of pyridine was added, and the mixture was concentrated to an oil. Additional CH2Cl2 was added (10 mL) and the mixture concentrated once more. Then 3 mL of CH2Cl2 was added and the mixture was purified on 60 g of silica gel, using a gradient of 2 to 30% CH3OH in CH2Cl2, to give 0.137 g of nearly pure 7b as a mixture of four isomers, m/z (M-H) 1032 (calculated for C43H48N11O14P2Si−: 1032), and 0.086 g of recovered 4b. This 7b was used as follows without further purification.
Coupling to give protected dimer alkyne, 8b
To 7b (0.137 g) from above in a 100 mL RBF with a stir bar was added pyridinium trifluroacetate (0.970 g, 5.03 mmol, 3 equiv rel to amidite). The mixture was dried 3× by evaporation of CH3CN, never letting it go dry, and ending with ~3 mL. The flask was sealed with a septum, then evacuated and refilled 10× with dry N2. 5'-Hexyn-1-yl-(2-cyanoethyl)-(N,N-diisopropyl)-phosphoramidite (0.50 g, 1.68 mmol, ~13.5 equiv) in two sealed bottles was dissolved by addition of 1.5 mL of dry CH3CN through the septum of the first bottle, the contents transferred to the second bottle, and then to the flask. The solution was stirred for 45 min, and 5.5 M tert-butyl hydroperoxide (1.22 mL, 6.72 mmol, 4 equiv rel to amidite) was added. The solution was stirred for 40 min, then concentrated, and purified on 40 g of silica gel, using a gradient of 0 to 25% CH3OH in CH2Cl2, to give 8b as a mixture of eight isomers. This 8b was used as follows without further purification.
Deprotection to give dimer alkyne, 9b
To 8b from above in a 100 mL RBF with a stir bar was added 18 mL (144 mmol, ~180 equiv rel to each bz) of CH3NH2 in anhydrous EtOH (33% by weight). After 3 h, the mixture was concentrated to dryness. Pyridine (3 mL) and Et3N (2 mL) were added and the mixture was concentrated to an oil. This process was repeated two more times to convert the tert-BuNH3+ to the Et3 NH+ salt. Pyridine (2 mL) was added and the flask with a vent needle was placed in an oil bath at 55 °C, and stirred for 5 min. Et3N (3.0 mL) and Et3N•3HF (1.9 mL, 35 mmol F−, ~85 equiv) were added simultaneously through separate syringes. Caution, HF: rinse all needles, syringes, septa, etc with aq K2CO3 before discarding. The solution was stirred overnight. The flask was then removed from the oil bath and placed on a different stir plate. HPLC grade acetone (95 mL) was added over 1 min, and the resulting suspension of white solid was stirred for 15 min. The product was collected by filtration in a sintered glass funnel, washed 3× with 5 mL of acetone, and dried in a desiccator overnight over KOH. The product was then dissolved in 2 mL of 0.1 M NH4HCO3 and purified by semi-preparative RP chromatography, using a gradient of 2 to 40% CH3CN in 0.1 M NH4HCO3, to give pure 9b (9.51mg) as primarily the Et3NH+ salt.
Another portion of 9b was prepared from 4b by the same method and was then converted to the Li+ salt. This second portion, 9b, Li+ (0.0755 g, 0.00903 mmol), was used to determine an extinction coefficient of 25,000 OD M−1 cm−1. Assuming that 9b, Et3NH+ and 9b, Li+ have the same extinction coefficient, the original preparation of 9b, Et3NH+ was determined by UV to be 0.0102 mmol, 3% from 4b, taking into account the recovered 4b from the monodesilylation. The Li+ salt of 9b was characterized as follows: m/z (M-H) 817 (calculated for C26H32N10O15P3−: 817); UV (H2O) λmax 258 nm, ε = 25,000 OD M−1 cm−1; 1H NMR (D2O): , 1H), 8.43 (s, 1H), 8.21 (s, 1H), 8.20 (s, 1H), 6.43 (s, 1H), 6.19 (s, 1H), 5.22 – 5.16 (m, 1H), 4.59 – 4.41 (m, 4H), 4.18 – 4.01 (m, 4H), 2.37 – 2.22 (m, 3H), 1.82 – 1.72 (m, 2H), 1.67 – 1.57 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (D2O): δ 153.2, 152.6, 149.9, 148.9, 147.7, 147.4, 140.6, 139.9, 118.5, 118.4, 89.9, 88.1, 86.2, 79.8, 79.7, 76.9, 74.0, 70.3, 69.4, 66.4, 62.3, 62.6, 29.3, 29.2, 24.4, 17.5; 31P NMR (D2O): δ 0.37, −0.68, −1.30.
Click conjugation to give biotinylated c-di-AMP, 10b
A portion of 9b, Et3NH+ (0.00500 mmol determined by UV) was lyophilized in a 15 mL centrifuge tube. The tube was evacuated and refilled 10× with Ar in a small desiccator. A 3:1 mixture of DMSO:tert-BuOH (2.5 mL) was added by syringe to a 0.025 mmol sealed bottle of N-biotin-2-aminoethyl-diethyleneglycolyl-ethyl azide to make a 0.0100 M solution. A portion of this solution (1.0 mL, 0.010 mmol, 2.0 equiv) was transferred by syringe to the lyophilized 9b, and the mixture was vortexed until it all dissolved. CuBr (0.0072 g, 0.050 mmol, 10 equiv rel to 9b) was weighed into a 15 mL centrifuge tube pre-filled with Ar. A 3:1 mixture of DMSO:tert-BuOH (0.94 mL) was added to a 50 mg bottle of TBTA (0.0942 mmol) to make a 0.10 M solution. The bottle was evacuated and refilled 10× with Ar. A portion of this solution (0.75 mL, 0.075 mmol, 1.5 equiv rel to CuBr) was then transferred by syringe to the tube of CuBr. This tube was vortexed, then evacuated and refilled 10× with Ar. The CuBr/TBTA solution was transferred using a glass pipet under a flow of Ar to the tube containing 9b/azide. This final tube was vortexed and left at room temperature.
After 20 h, a thick suspension of Amberlyte CG50 anion exchange resin was prepared in 3:1 DMSO: tert-BuOH, and ~2 mL (3.0 meq) was added to the tube containing 10b, which was shaken for 1h. Another 2 mL portion of the resin suspension was placed in a small column (1.5 cm diameter) and allowed to drain. The reaction mixture was then applied to this column and collected in a 50 mL centrifuge tube. The column was washed 15× with 1mL portions of H2O. The collected solution was divided among four 50 mL centrifuge tubes, diluted further with water, and lyophilized. Water (1 mL) was added to one of the tubes, the solid was scraped from the walls of the tube with a spatula, and the mixture was transferred in turn to each of the other tubes, with scraping. The final mixture was filtered through a 25 mm × 0.45 μm filter into a new 50 mL centrifuge tube. The original tubes were washed and scraped sequentially 10× with 1 mL of H2O, with each rinse filtered. The solution of crude 10b in the final tube was lyophilized.
Three other portions of 9b (5.00, 7.45, and 9.00 μmol) were used to prepare additional crude 10b by the same procedure, which was combined with the first. This combined crude 10b was purified by semi-preparative RP chromatography to give pure 10b, primarily as the Et3NH+ salt. This product was converted to the Li+ salt, to give 10b, Li+ (0.01020 g, 0.0080 mmol, 30% from 0.0265 mmol of 9b), which was characterized as follows: m/z (M-H) 1261 (calculated for C44H64N16O20P3S−: 1261); UV (H2O) λmax 259 nm, ε = 13,200; 1H NMR (D2O): δ 8.33 – 8.29 (2s, 2H), 8.02 – 7.95 (2s, 2H), 7.58 (s, 1H), 6.22 (s, 1H), 6.03 (s, 1H), 5.15 – 5.10 (m, 1H), 4.97 – 4.90 (m, 1H), 4.86 – 4.80 (m, 1H), 4.65 – 4.61 (m, 1H), 4.44 – 4.17 (m, 8H), 4.06 – 3.97 (m, 2H), 3.92 – 3.81 (m, 2H), 3.77 (t, J = 5 Hz, 2H), 3.48 – 3.37 (m, 10 H), 3.21 (t, J = 5 Hz, 2H), 3.06 (p, J – 4 Hz, 1H), 2.78 (dd, J = 13 Hz, J = 5 Hz, 1H), 2.62 – 2.45 (m, 3H), 2.07 (t, J = 7 Hz, 2H), 1.55 – 1.31 (m, 8H), 1.22 – 1.12 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (D2O): δ 177.0, 167.8, 155.5, 155.4, 152.9, 152.8, 148.4, 148.3, 147.8, 139.9, 139.3, 123.4, 118.7, 118.6, 89.7, 87.5, 79.9, 79.7, 76.6, 73.9, 70.6, 70.5, 69.8, 69.7, 69.6, 69.0, 66.3, 66.2, 62.2, 60.4, 55.5, 50.0, 39.9, 39.1, 35.6, 29.4, 28.0, 27.8, 25.3, 25.0, 24.3; 31P NMR (D2O): δ 0.29, −0.43, −0.92.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Our previously described one-flask route to c-di-GMP26 started with standard commercial N-ib-2'-O-TBS-5'-O-DMT guanosine phosphoramidite, 1a. In brief, as shown in Scheme 1, one portion was converted to the H-phosphonate and detritylated with trichloroacetic acid to give N-ib-2'-O-TBS-guanosine 3'-H-phosphonate, 2a. Quenching of the acid with pyridine generated pyridinium trichloroacetate which, along with the pyridinium trifluoroacetate from the previous step, catalyzed the subsequent amidite coupling. After that amidite coupling of 2a to a second portion of 1a, followed by oxidation and detritylation, the resulting linear dimer, 3a, was cyclized by an H-phosphonate coupling and oxidized to give 4a. To prepare 6a, first the single cyanoethyl group was removed, and the resulting symmetric product, 5a, was readily crystallized. This pure intermediate was then fully deprotected and precipitated/crystallized to give 6a.
Scheme 1.

Syntheses of c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP from commercially available phosphoramidites 1a and 1b.
Our strategy for the new work reported here on the synthesis of biotinylated c-di-GMP, as shown in Scheme 2, was to perform a monodesilylation of 4a, while retaining the cyanoethyl group for good chromatographic behavior and reasonable solubility in organic solvents. The resulting intermediate, 7a, could then be reacted with hexynyl phosphoramidite with minimal side reactions. We therefore prepared a portion of 4a from 1a according to Scheme 1, and then purified it by silica chromatography. We had previously carried out similar chromatography to separate dithiophosphate diastereomers,26 but here we combined the two diastereomers to give 4a in 45% yield from 1a. We then carried out the monodesilylation of 4a, using only enough pyridine•HF to give about 50% of 7a and 10% full desilylation, leaving about 40% of starting 4a. Silica chromatography of the mixture gave reasonably pure 7a as four isomers, and the recovered 4a, which could later be reused.
Scheme 2.

Syntheses of biotinylated c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP.
Commercial hexynyl phosphoramidite (4.5 equiv) was reacted with 7a to give 8a. Silica chromatography gave a reasonably pure mixture of eight isomers, which was then fully deprotected with CH3NH2 followed by Et3N•3HF to give the dimer alkyne, 9a, as a single compound. Although the product was pure after semi-preparative RP chromatography, it was not completely the Et3NH+ salt, as found by NMR. Therefore, a new portion of 9a was prepared from 4a the same way, and then converted to the Li+ salt, a non-volatile cation that does not favor guanine quartet assemblies. This 9a, Li+ salt was used to determine a molar extinction coefficient of 22,700 OD M-1 cm-1. Assuming 9a, Li+ and 9a, Et3NH+ salt have the same extinction coefficient, the yield for the original synthesis of 9a, Et3NH+ salt from 4a was determined to be 12%, taking into account the recovered 4a from the monodesilylation. The Et3NH+ salt of 9a was used in the subsequent click reaction, rather than the Li+ salt, because of its better solubility in organic solvents.
Conditions were then optimized for the click reaction with commercial biotinylated azide. We found that 1.5 equiv of the azide in the presence of 4 equiv of CuBr with 1.5 equiv (rel to CuBr) of the stabilizing ligand tris((1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)amine (TBTA) in a solvent mixture of 3:1 DMSO:tert-BuOH gave complete conversion by HPLC of 9a, Et3NH+ salt to the biotinylated c-di-GMP, 10a, after 20 h at room temperature. However, we discovered that a significant amount of 10a was lost by associating with the TBTA that precipitated upon addition of H2O. We therefore shook the completed reaction mixture with a suspension of Amberlyte CG50 weak anion exchange resin in the same solvent for an hour to release the product, and then applied it to a small column containing additional resin. The resulting solution was diluted with H2O and lyophilized. Purification by semi-preparative RP chromatography gave pure 10a, but again not completely the Et3NH+ salt. It was therefore converted to the Li+ salt and lyophilized to give 10a, Li+ salt in 43% isolated yield from 9a.
We also report here that c-di-AMP, 6b, can be prepared by the same one-flask procedure we used for c-di-GMP. The symmetric intermediate 5b was obtained in 28% yield from 1b, and c-di-AMP, 6b, was isolated in 81% yield from 5b, 23% yield from 1b. The only difference in the procedure was a longer time for the final removal of the TBS groups. In both cases, the use of an amidite coupling to prepare the linear dimer, followed by the extremely fast and specific H-phosphonate cyclization, is an ideal combination that gives a high-yield, scalable, and efficient set of reactions that do not require chromatography. In recent years, others have prepared c-di-AMP on fairly small scales using an amidite coupling with a phosphotriester cyclization,15, 35 as well as phosphotriester reactions for both steps.36
In addition to the facile preparation of c-di-AMP, we demonstrate here that its biotinylated conjugate, 10b, can be synthesized by the same method used for biotinylated c-di-GMP, 10a. The intermediate dimer alkynes described in this work, 9a/b, are versatile synthons and could readily be conjugated with longer biotinylated azides or even with azides linked to other functionalities.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by NIH grant GM79760.
ABBREVIATIONS
- bz
benzoyl
- c-di-AMP
cyclic diadenosine monophosphate
- c-di-GMP
cyclic diguanosine monophosphate
- DCA
dichloroacetic acid
- DMOCP
5,5-dimethyl-2-oxo-2-chloro-1,3,2-dioxaphosphinane
- DMSO
dimethylsulfoxide
- ib
isobutyryl
- RBF
round bottom flask
- RP HPLC
reverse phase high pressure liquid chromatography
- TBS
tert-butyl-dimethylsilyl
- TBTA
tris((1-benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)amine
- TEAA
triethylammonium acetate
Footnotes
SUPPORTING INFORMATION AVAILABLE HPLC, UV, 1H, 13C, 31P NMR spectra. This material is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
REFERENCES
- 1.Gomelsky M. cAMP, c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP and now cGMP: bacteria use them all! Mol. Microbiol. 2011;79:562–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07514.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Römling U. Great times for small molecules: c-di-AMP, a second messenger candidate in bacteria and archaea. Sci. Signal. 2008;1:pe39. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.133pe39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hengge R. Principles of c-di-GMP signalling in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;7:263–273. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Krasteva PV, Giglio KM, Sondermann H. Sensing the messenger: The diverse ways that bacteria signal through c-di-GMP. Protein Sci. 2012;21:929–948. doi: 10.1002/pro.2093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mills E, Pultz IS, Kulasekara HD, Miller SI. The bacterial second messenger c-di-GMP: mechanisms of signalling. Cell. Microbiol. 2011;13:1122–1129. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01619.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Povolotsky TL, Hengge R. 'Life-style' control networks in Escherichia coli: Signaling by the second messenger c-di-GMP. J. Biotechnol. 2012;160:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2011.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Quin MB, Berrisford JM, Newman JA, Baslé A, Lewis RJ, Marles-Wright J. The bacterial stressosome: A modular system that has been adapted to control secondary messenger signaling. Structure. 2012;20:350–363. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sondermann H, Shikuma NJ, Yildiz FH. You've come a long way: c-di-GMP signaling. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2012;15:140–146. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schirmer T, Jenal U. Structural and mechanistic determinants of c-di-GMP signalling. Nat Rev Micro. 2009;7:724–735. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ko J, Ryu K-S, Kim H, Shin J-S, Lee J-O, Cheong C, Choi B-S. Structure of PP4397 reveals the molecular basis for different c-di-GMP binding modes by Pilz domain proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2010;398:97–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kulshina N, Baird NJ, Ferré-D'Amaré AR. Recognition of the bacterial second messenger cyclic diguanylate by its cognate riboswitch. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009;16:1212–1217. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee ER, Baker JL, Weinberg Z, Sudarsan N, Breaker RR. An allosteric self-splicing ribozyme triggered by a bacterial second messenger. Science (Wash.) 2010;329:845–848. doi: 10.1126/science.1190713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shanahan CA, Gaffney BL, Jones RA, Strobel SA. Differential analog binding by two classes of c-di-GMP riboswitches. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:15578–15592. doi: 10.1021/ja204650q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Smith KD, Lipchock SV, Ames TD, Wang J, Breaker RR, Strobel SA. Structural basis of ligand binding by a c-di-GMP riboswitch. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009;16:1218–1223. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Smith KD, Lipchock SV, Livingston AL, Shanahan CA, Strobel SA. Structural and biochemical determinants of ligand binding by the c-di-GMP riboswitch. Biochemistry. 2010;49:7351–7359. doi: 10.1021/bi100671e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Smith KD, Shanahan CA, Moore EL, Simon AC, Strobel SA. Structural basis of differential ligand recognition by two classes of bis-(32–52)-cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate-binding riboswitches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:7757–7762. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018857108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sudarsan N, Lee ER, Weinberg Z, Moy RH, Kim JN, Link KH, Breaker RR. Riboswitches in eubacteria sense the second messenger cyclic di-GMP. Science (Wash.) 2008;321:411–413. doi: 10.1126/science.1159519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Corrigan RM, Abbott JC, Burhenne H, Kaever V, Gründling A. c-di-AMP is a new second messenger in Staphylococcus aureus with a role in controling cell size and envelope stress. PLoS Path. 2011;7:e1002217. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Luo Y, Helmann JD. Analysis of the role of Bacillus subtilis σM in β-lactam resistance reveals an essential role for c-di-AMP in peptidoglycan homeostasis. Mol. Microbiol. 2012;83:623–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07953.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Oppenheimer-Shaanan Y, Wexselblatt E, Katzhendler J, Yavin E, Ben-Yehuda S. c-di-AMP reports DNA integrity during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:594–601. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Witte G, Hartung S, B¸ttner K, Hopfner K-P. Structural biochemistry of a bacterial checkpoint protein reveals diadenylate cyclase activity regulated by DNA recombination intermediates. Mol. Cell. 2008;30:167–178. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Karaolis DKR, Means TK, Yang D, Takahashi M, Yoshimura T, Muraille E, Philpott D, Schroeder JT, Hyodo M, Hayakawa Y, Talbot BG, Brouillette E, Malouin F. Bacterial c-di-GMP is an immunostimulatory molecule. J. Immunol. 2007;178:2171–2181. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.4.2171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Woodward JJ, Iavarone AT, Portnoy DA. c-di-AMP secreted by intracellular Listeria monocytogenes activates a host type I interferon response. Science. 2010;328:1703–1705. doi: 10.1126/science.1189801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Burdette DL, Monroe KM, Sotelo-Troha K, Iwig JS, Eckert B, Hyodo M, Hayakawa Y, Vance RE. STING is a direct innate immune sensor of cyclic di-GMP. Nature. 2011;478:515–518. doi: 10.1038/nature10429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Galperin MY, Higdon R, Kolker E. Interplay of heritage and habitat in the distribution of bacterial signal transduction systems. Mol. BioSyst. 2010;6:721–728. doi: 10.1039/b908047c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gaffney BL, Veliath E, Zhao J, Jones RA. One-flask syntheses of c-di-GMP and the [Rp,Rp] and [Rp,Sp] thiophosphate analogues. Org. Lett. 2010;12:3269–3271. doi: 10.1021/ol101236b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang Z, Gaffney BL, Jones RA. c-di-GMP displays a monovalent metal ion-dependent polymorphism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:16700–16701. doi: 10.1021/ja0449832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang Z, Kim S, Gaffney BL, Jones RA. Polymorphism of the signaling molecule c-di-GMP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:7015–7024. doi: 10.1021/ja0613714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhao J, Veliath E, Kim S, Gaffney BL, Jones RA. Thiophosphate analogs of c-di-GMP: impact on polymorphism. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucl. Acids. 2009;28:352–378. doi: 10.1080/15257770903044523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Binder WH, Kluger C. Azide/alkyne-“click” reactions: applications in material science and oganic synthesis. Curr. Org. Chem. 2006;10:1791–1815. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bock VD, Hiemstra H, van Maarseveen JH. Cu1-catalyzed alkyne-azide “click“ cycloadditions from a mechanistic and synthetic perspective. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006:51–68. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Moses JE, Moorhouse AD. The growing applications of click chemsistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007;36:1249–1262. doi: 10.1039/b613014n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Grajkowski A, Cieslak J, Gapeev A, Schindler C, Beaucage SL. Convenient synthesis of a propargylated cyclic (3'-5') diguanylic acid and its “click” conjugation to a biotinylated azide. Bioconjugate Chem. 2010;21:2147–2152. doi: 10.1021/bc1003857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Luo Y, Zhou J, Watt SK, Lee VT, Dayie TK, Sintin HO. Differential binding of 2'-biotinylated analogs of c-di-GMP with c-di-GMP riboswitches and binding proteins. Mol. BioSyst. 2012;8:772–778. doi: 10.1039/c2mb05338a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Suzuki N, Oyama K.-i., Tsukamoto M. Practical synthesis of cyclic bis(3'-5')diadenylic acid (c-di-AMP) Chem. Lett. 2011;40:1113–1114. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Amiot N, Heintz K, Giese B. New approach for the synthesis of c-di-GMP and its analogues. Synthesis. 2006;4230:4236. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
