Abstract
Background: To study the expression levels and clinical significance of Argonaute2 (EIF2C2) on colonic carcinomas and normal tissues. Methods: Colon tissue samples from 90 cases of colonic carcinomas and 90 normal subjects were accumulated and made into a tissue microarray containing 360 dots. Expression of Argonaute2 (EIF2C2) was detected by immunohistochemical staining of the tissue microarray. Results: There was significant difference in the expression levels of Argonaute2 (EIF2C2) between colonic carcinomas and normal tissues (P<0.01). However, the expression of Argonaute2 (EIF2C2) was not related to sex, age, position, differentiation, lymphatic metastasis and clinical stage of the tumor (P>0.05). Conclusion: Abnormal expression of Argonaute2 (EIF2C2) may be correlated with colon tumorigenesis.
Keywords: Tissue mircroarray, immunohistochemstry, colonic carcinoma, Argonaute2
Introduction
Colonic carcinoma is one of the most frequent cancers in the Western world. At the present time, with the changes in living conditions and life style, colonic carcinoma has become more frequent in China. The prognosis in advanced cases is poor and more than one-third of the patients die from progressive disease and the overall survival is about 40% after 5 years [1]. Given the high level in incidence rate and mortality rate of colonic carcinoma, it would be important to better understand the biological basis of tumor development and progression, to develop markers for assessing onset or prediction of therapy outcome, as well as to identify targets for the development of novel therapies. Colonic carcinoma may be considered the final step of a progressive imbalance between mucosal cell proliferation and apoptosis due to the activation of oncogenes and the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes [2-4]. The evaluation of the clinical utility of each of these genes would require multiple experiments with hundreds of tumor specimens. This would be both time-consuming as well as impractical for more than a handful of genes. Microarray technology provides a new and promising tool that allows the detection of multiple parameters simultaneously, and could be of importance in treating colonic carcinoma.
There are endogenous non-protein-coding RNA molecules in the human genome, which include transfer RNA, ribosomal RNA and various small non-coding RNAs. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, non-coding, single-stranded RNAs ~22 nucleotides in length, which regulate gene expression by pairing with messenger RNA of target genes [5-8]. After being first identified in C.elegans, miRNAs were subsequently found in plants and animals, showing that they are highly conserved [5-8]. Regulation of miRNA is a complex process and is well orchestrated with many cellular components [5,7,8]. From genomic DNA, miRNAs are transcribed to primary miRNAs, which are subsequently processed to precursor miRNAs by Drosha RNAse III endonuclease in complex with the double-stranded RNA-binding domain protein DGCR8 [9,10]. After export from nucleus to cytoplasm by exportin5, precursor miRNAs are further cleaved by Dicer in a complex with TARBP proteins to generate a short RNA duplex [9,10]. Of the duplex, one strand becomes a mature miRNA, while the other strand is rapidly degraded. The mature miRNA directs a RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to 3’-untranslated region (UTR) of its complementary target genes and causes inhibition of translation and degradation of the messenger RNA [13-15]. The major components of the RISC are the Ago proteins. Argonaute2 is a member of a family of eight proteins in mammals, four of which are germ line specific [16]. Ago proteins contain a P-element induced wimpy testis (PIWI) domain that can adopt a ribomuclease H fole with potentially innate endonuclease activity [17-20]. However, Argonaute2 is the only Ago protein shown to mediate miRNA-dependent cleavage/degradation of target mRNAs in mammals. Recently, studies have also implicated functional roles for Argonaute2 independent of its endonuclease activity [21-25]. Argonaute2 has been observed to be diffuse within the cytoplasm and localized in both processing bodies (P bodies) and the nucleus [26].
Several lines of evidence indicate that miRNA is important in development, cell proliferation and cell death, deregulations of which contribute to the pathogenesis of cancers [27-30]. Some miRNAs act as either a tumor suppressor or a tumor promoter and alterations of miRNA have been identified in human cancers [27-30]. Transcriptional and epigenetic alterations, gene mutation and DNA copy number alteration of miRNAs have been reported in human cancers [27-30,31]. In addition, altered expression and mutation of components in miRNA biogenesis have been reported [32-35]. However, data on the expression of Argonaute2 in colonic carcinoma is lacking. In the present study we analyzed the expression level of Argonaute2 in colonic carcinoma tissues by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray (TMA) approach.
Materials and methods
Preparation and identification of Argonaute2
We adopted the Ensemble database and the antibody screening software (Dragonfly, USA) to select the distinctive piece of Argonaute2 protein and then add aminothipropionic acid on C-terminal to connect peptide fragment and carrier. The peptide fragment was synthesized by C-Strong and the molecular weight by mass spectral analysis corresponded to the theoretical molecular weight. We coupled Argonaute2 peptide to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) to construct Argonaute2-KLH conjugate. The Argonaute2-KLH conjugate was injected into rabbits subcutaneously to produce polyclonal antibodies. Evolution of the antibody titer was controlled by measuring the binding of serial dilutions of the antisera to microtiter plates coated with peptide antigen. Eight weeks after the first injection, sera were collected and used to prepare purified antibodies. The lgG solution was fractionated from the rabbit antisera by precipitation with 40% saturated ammonium sulphate and then affinity-purified on peptide affinity columns. The flowthrough was collected and stored at -20°C for use in ELISA, Western blot, and immunohistochemistry analyses. The specificity and sensitivity of the antibodies were identified by ELISA and Western blotting after purification using affinity chromatorgraphy. The tissue chip array was used to study the distribution and expression levels of Argonaute2.
Patients and specimens
Demographic and clinical data were collected retrospectively. None of the patients received radiotherapy or chemotherapy before surgery. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumors and normal tissues (≥5cm away from the tumor) specimens were obtained from the archives of the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, the Tongji Hospital of Tongji University and National Engineering Center for Biochip at Shanghai. All specimens were viewed by one pathologist (Jing Fang). The specimens that were interpretable for IHC included: (1) Ninety colon cancer specimens including different grades, such as moderate to high (n=69) and low differentiated (n=21); (2) ninety normal colon tissues resected from areas of the colon ≥ 5 cms from the corresponding cancer tissues.
Patients were only included in the study if they had provided written consent to participate in the study after receiving oral and written information regarding its course and purpose. Approval for the study was received from the Ethics Committee of the host institution.
Construction and sectioning of tissue microarray
The colon cancer microarray was constructed as previously described [36]. Briefly, fresh sections were cut from the donor block and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and these slides were used to guide the samplings from morphologically representative regions of the tissues. A tissue array instrument was used to create holes in a recipient paraffin block and to acquire tissue cores from the donor block by a thin-walled needle with an inner diameter of 1.0 mm or 1.5 mm, held in an X-Y precision guide. The cylindrical samples were retrieved from the selected regions in the donors and extruded directly onto the recipient blocks with defined array coordinates. After the construction of the array block, multiple 4 mm thick sections were cut with a microtome using an adhesive-coated tape sectioning system.
Tissue loss was a significant factor for tissue array based analysis with previously reported rates of tissue damage ranging from 15% to 33% [37-39]. In our analysis the rates of lost cases attributable to tissue damage were less than 5% for the different markers and damaged tissues were excluded from clinicopathological analyses of the respective markers.
IHC on formalin-fixed tissue microarray sections
IHC staining for the Argonaute2 on sections of the formalin-fixed samples on the tissue microarray was carried out by using the Envision ready-to-use methods. Slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through graded concentrations of ethanol to distilled water and endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation with 30 mL/L H2O2 in methanol for 10 min at room temperature. Then sections were submitted to antigen retrieval in a pressure cooker containing 0.01 mmol/L natrium citricium buffer for 10 min. Slides were subsequently incubated in 100 mL/L normal goat serum for 20 min at room temperature. Sections were permeabilized in PBS-Triton and incubated overnight with primary antibody at 4°C. The antibodies were used in PBS-Trison with variable dilution. Rabbit anti-human polyclonal antibody to Argonaute2 was used. Each section was then incubated with Envision rabbit peroxidase (GeneTech) for 30min. Finally, the sections were treated with 0.02% 3,3’-diaminoberzidine and 0.005% H2O2 in 0.05mmol/L Tris-Hcl buffer and counterstained by hematoxylin.
Scoring of Argonaute2 expression
The evaluation of the immunohistochemical staining was performed independently by two authors without knowledge of the clinicpothological information. The immunoreactive scores besides Argonaute2 were determined by the sum of extension and intensity as reported previously [40]. The intensity of the staining was scored using the following scale: 0, no staining of the tumor cells; +, mild staining; ++, moderate staining and +++, marked staining. The area of staining was evaluated and recorded as a percentage: 0, less than 5%; +, 5%-25%; ++, 26%-50%; 3+, 51%-75% and 4+, more than 75%. The combined scores were recorded and graded as follows: -, 0; +; 1-2; ++, 3-5; +++, 6-7.
Statistical analysis
Computerized statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 12.0. Clinical and histopathologic information and the results from the immunohistochemical studies of the tissue microarray were entered into a database. The variances of Argonaute2 expression among different tissues was analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-test and the clinicopathological data was analyzed with Spearman’s correlation test. In all statistical analyses, a two-tailed P value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Clinicopathological data
Complete histological and clinical data were collected from patient’ records, which showed that the median age of the study population was 60 years (range, 28-93 years). There were 33 patients with median age less than 60 years. There was a male predominance in the cancer patients (male:female ratio=48:42). Forty-five patients had positive lymph node metastasis, whereas 45 were negative. The clinical stages of these patients were strictly identified as A (n=6), B (n=38), C (n=40) and D (n=6) according to Dukes stage. After the second diagnostic assessment there were 21 low and 69 moderate to highly differentiated tissues in the cancer tissue blocks according to the histological grades.
Production and validation of antibodies against Argonaute2 protein
An in-house peptide selection database called Antibody Designer was used to select optimal peptide immunogens for production of antibodies against human Argonaute2 protein. A synthetic peptide derived from the sequence of Argonaute2 was conjugated to KLH for immunization. The peptide showed strong immune response after 4 immunizations in rabbits, and antisera exhibited high tier when tested by ELISA using immobilized peptide on 96-well microtiter plates. Antibodies from individual rabbits were purified separately by peptide affinity chromatography (Figure 1). Typically 2-20 milligrams of purified antibodies were obtained for each peptide. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the molecular mass of purified antibodies was 50 kDa, which corresponded to the molecular mass of rabbit IgG. Total protein extracted from either Hela or 293 cells was used for immunoblotting with purified antibodies. Western blot analysis showed that these purified antibodies recognized the bands at expected molecule mass corresponding to the Argonaute2 protein (Figure 2). In contrast, no band was detected with preimmune rabbit serum. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis showed predominantly cytoplasmic staining in most tumorous tissues but very weak or no staining in normal human tissues.
Figure 1.

Detection of affinity chromatograph-purified Argonaute2 antibodies by ELISA. The peptide showed strong immune response after 4 immunizations in rabbits, and antisera exhibited high tier when tested by ELISA using immobilized peptide on 96-well microtiter plates. Antibodies from individual rabbits were purified separately by peptide affinity chromatography.
Figure 2.

Western blot analysis of argonaute2 (EIF2C2)antibody using Hela, 293 cells. Total proteinextracted from either Hela or 293 cells was used forimmunoblotting with purified antibodies. Westernblot analysis showed that these purified antibodiesrecognized the bands at expected molecule masscorresponding to the Argonaute2 protein.
Argonaute2 expression in colonic carcinoma
Expression of Argonaute2 was analyzed in normal and cancer tissues of the colon by immunohistochemical approach using TMA. The data on the immunostainings are summarized in Table 1. In colonic carcinoma different levels of Argonaute2 immunopositivity was observed in 89 of 90 tissues (Figure 3A and 3B). In normal colonic tissues, weak immunopositivity was observed for Argonaute2 in 84 of 90 tissues (Figure 3C and 3D). Statistically, Argonaute2 expression in colonic carcinoma tissues was significantly higher than those in normal tissues (P<0.01).
Table 1.
Expression of Argonaute2 (EIF2C2) in tumor tissues and normal tissues
| Tissue type | No. | Argonaute2(EIF2C2) | Z | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| ﹣ | + | ++ | +++ | ||||
| Tumor tissue | 90 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 73 | -8.498 | 0.000 |
| Normal tissue | 90 | 6 | 27 | 43 | 14 | ||
Figure 3.
A: Immunohistochemistry expression of argonaute2 in tumor tissue (×200). B: Immunohistochemistry expression of argonaute2 in tumor tissue (×400). C: Immunohistochemistry expression of argonaute2 in normal tissue (×200). D: Immunohistochemistry expression of argonaute2 in normal tissue (×400).
The spearman’s analysis of clinicopathologic factors related to Argonaute2
We then analyzed the relationship of immunostaining with various pathologic parameters (age, sex, tumor location, degree of differentiation, metastasis to lymph node, Dukes’ grade and stage). However, there was no significant association with any of the above factors (P>0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Relationship between the expression of Argonaute2 and clinicopathological parameters
| Clinicpathological parameters | No. | Argonaute2 | Rank sum test | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| ﹣ | + | ++ | +++ | ||||
| Age (year) | |||||||
| >60 | 57 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 46 | 0.023 | 0.831 |
| ≤60 | 33 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 27 | ||
| Sex | |||||||
| male | 48 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 40 | -0.042 | 0.693 |
| female | 42 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 33 | ||
| Location | |||||||
| rectum | 40 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 30 | 0.141 | 0.185 |
| colon | 50 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 43 | ||
| Differentiate | |||||||
| high+moderate | 69 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 57 | -0.062 | 0.559 |
| Low | 21 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 16 | ||
| Lymph node transfer | |||||||
| positive | 45 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 37 | -0.020 | 0.851 |
| negative | 45 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 36 | ||
| Staging (Dukes) | |||||||
| CD | 46 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 38 | -0.031 | 0.773 |
| AB | 44 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 35 | ||
Discussion
Colonic carcinogenesis is characterized by distinct morphological, genetic and cellular events. Development and progression of colon cancer to metastasis and lethal state are believed to be driven by multiple genetic alterations, the nature of which has remained poorly understood.
There have been many examples of alterations of miRNAs and miRNA-related gene expressions in human cancers [27-29,31-35]. Many miRNA genes are deleted or amplified in human cancers [31]. During miRNA biogenesis, failure at the Drosha processing step caused a widespread down-regulation in uterine cancers [32]. Dicer and other miRNA biogenesis genes are down-regulated in lung adenocarcinomas [33], while Dicer is up-regulated in lung squamous cell carcinomas and prostate carcinoma [34,35]. These reports suggest that deregulations of miRNAs themselves and those of miRNA biogenesis machinery might be influencing factors in tumor development. Such frequent alterations led us to analyze expression levels of the RISC protein Argonaute2 in colonic carcinoma. Although several human Argonaute proteins have been identified, relatively little is known about their functions in human disease. Argonaute subfamily members are components essential for siRNA-mediated gene silencing in mammalian cells and involved in the effecter step of mammalian RNAi. In the present study, we sought to determine whether there was any difference in Argonaute2 expression between normal and colon carcinoma tissues, which had not been studied previously. We found that Argonaute2 was weakly expressed in normal colonic tissues and differently expressed in colonic carcinoma tissues, suggesting that the increase in Argonaute2 expression may occur at an early stage of some colonic carcinomas.
An earlier study demonstrated that expression level of Argonaute2 is elevated in estrogen receptor (ER) α-negative (ERα-) vs. ERα-positive (Erα+) breast cancer cell lines and in ERα- breast tumors. In MCF-7 cells the low level of Argonaute2 was found to be dependent upon active Erα/estrogen signaling. Interestingly, the increased expression of Argonaute2 in ERα- cells was severely blunted by inhibition of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor/MAPK signaling pathway. These data indicate that Argonaute2 is regulated at both the transcriptional and posttranslational level and also implicate Argonaute2 and enhanced miRNA activity in the tumorigenic progression of breast cancer cell lines [41].
Nam et al. analyzed the expression of Argonaute2 in 107 prostate carcinomas (PCA) and 58 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) tissues by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray (TMA) method [42]. In the prostate, Argonaute2 was not expressed in normal glandular cells, while it was expressed in 50.0% of prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and 57% of the PCA. In the esophagus Argonaute2 was expressed in normal squamous cells, while Argonaute2 was expressed in 58.6% of the ESCC, respectively. However, the expression of Argonaute2 was not associated with pathologic characteristics of the cancers, including age, sex, Gleason score (PCA) and stage. The increased expressions of Argonaute2 in both PCA and ESCC compared with corresponding normal tissues suggested that overexpression of the protein may be related to miRNA functions and might play a role in tumorigenesis of PCA and ESCC.
The interaction of Argonaute proteins with small RNAs or other parts of RISC involved in carcinogenesis has not been completely elucidated. Gene specific translational control induced by some miRNA species has been reported to have an effect on cancer development [8]. As a component of RISC, Argonaute2 binds to miRNAs or piRNAs (Piwi-interactingRNA), and aberrant regulation of these small RNAs by Argonaute2 might induce the malignant phenotype of these cells. SND1, also reported to be a component of RISC, is overexpressed in human colonic carcinoma tissues, even in early-stage lesions [43-45]. Identification of target mRNA species and interacting partners of Argonaute2 might provide us with further insights into more precise roles of Argonaute2 in colonic carcinogenesis [44].
Li et al. constructed a tissue microarray containing 75 specimens from colon cancer and 75 specimens from adjacent non-cancerous tissue and assayed the Argonaute family by immunohistochemistry on consecutive formalin-fixed tissue microarray sections [46]. The expression of EIF2C1-4 and PIWIL1-4 was significantly higher in tumors tissues than in adjacent tissues. Notably, a significant correlation was observed between the positive expression levels of EIF2C2, EIF2C3, EIF2C4, PIWIL4 and the presence of distant metastasis, suggesting that they may promote tumor invasion.
In the present study, we did not find any association between the clinicopathologic parameters of the patients and Argonaute2 expression, suggesting that the alterations in the levels of Argonaute2 expression might not directly result in discernible changes in the behavior of the cancers. To determine whether such over-expression is common feature of cancers, expression status of Argonaute2 should be further analyzed in other cancers.
References
- 1.Pohl C, Hombach A, Kruis W. Chronic inflammatory bowel disease and cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 Jan-Feb;47:57–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Grady WM, Carethers JM. Genomic and epigenetic instability in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2008 Oct;135:1079–99. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ohta M, Sugimoto T, Seto M, Mohri D, Asaoka Y, Tada M, Tanaka Y, Yamaji Y, Kanai F, Kawabe T, Omata M. Genetic alterations in colorectal cancers with demethylation of insulin-like growth factor II. Hum Pathol. 2008 Sep;39:1301–8. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Samowitz WS. Genetic and epigenetic changes in colon cancer. Exp Mol Pathol. 2008 Aug;85:64–7. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2008.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Calin GA, Croce CM. MicroRNA signatures in human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Nov;6:857–66. doi: 10.1038/nrc1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ambros V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004 Sep 16;431:350–55. doi: 10.1038/nature02871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics,biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004 Jan 23;116:281–97. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ. Oncomirs-microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Apr;6:259–69. doi: 10.1038/nrc1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee Y, Jeon K, Lee JT, Kim S, Kim VN. MicroRNA maturation: stepwise processing and subcellular localization. EMBO J. 2002 Sep 2;21:4663–70. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee Y, Ahn C, Han J, Choi H, Kim J, Yim J, Lee J, Provost P, Rådmark O, Kim S, Kim VN. The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing. Nature. 2003 Sep 25;425:415–9. doi: 10.1038/nature01957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yi R, Qin Y, Macara IG, Cullen BR. Exportin-5 mediates the nuclear export of pre-microRNAs and short hairpin RNAs. Genes Dev. 2003 Dec 15;17:3011–6. doi: 10.1101/gad.1158803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ketting RF, Fischer SE, Bernstein E, Sijen T, Hannon GJ, Plasterk RH. Dicer functions in RNA interference and in synthesis of small RNA involved in developental timing in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 2001 Oct 15;15:2654–9. doi: 10.1101/gad.927801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gregory RI, Chendrimada TP, Cooch N, Shiekhattar R. Human RISC couples microRNA biogenesis and posttranscriptional gene silencing. Cell. 2005 Nov 18;123:631–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chendrimada TP, Gregory RI, Kumaraswamy E, Norman J, Cooch N, Nishikura K, Shiekhattar R. TRBP recruits the Dicer complex to Ago2 for microRNA processsing and gene silencing. Nature. 2005 Aug 4;436:740–4. doi: 10.1038/nature03868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Meister G, Landthaler M, Patkaniowska A, Dorsett Y, Teng G, Tuschl T. Human Argonaute2 mediates RNA cleavage targeted by miRNAs and siRNAs. Mol Cell. 2004 Jul 23;15:185–97. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Garmell MA, Xuan Z, Zhang MQ, Hannon GJ. The Argonaute family: tentacles that reach into RNAi, developmental control, stem cell maintenance, and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2002 Nov 1;16:2733–42. doi: 10.1101/gad.1026102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Song JJ, Smith SK, Hannon GJ, Joshua-Tor L. Crystal structure of Argonaute and its implications for RISC slicer activity. Science. 2004 Sep 3;305:1434–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1102514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu J, Carmell MA, Rivas FV, Marsden CG, Thomson JM, Song JJ, Hammond SM, Joshu- Tor L, Hannon GJ. Argonaute2 is the catalytic engine of mammalian RNAi. Science. 2004 Sep 3;305:1437–41. doi: 10.1126/science.1102513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yuan YR, Pei Y, Ma JB, Kuryabyi V, Zhadina M, Meister G, Chen HY, Dauter Z, Tuschl T, Patal DJ. Crystal structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute, a site-specifilc DNA-guided endoribonuclease, provides insights into RISC-mediated Mrna CLEAVAGE. Mol Cell. 2005 Aug 5;19:405–19. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Martinez J, Patkaniowska A, Uriaub H, Luhrmann R, Tuschl T. Single-stranded antisense siRNAs guide target RNA cleavage in RNAi. Cell. 2002 Sep 6;110:563–74. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00908-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Deshpande G, Callhon G, Schedl P. Drosophila argonaute-2 is required early in embryogenesis for the assembly of centric/centromeric heterochromatin, nuclear division, nuclear migration, and germ-cell formation. Genes Dev. 2005 Jul 15;19:1680–5. doi: 10.1101/gad.1316805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tsukioka H, Takahashi M, Mon H, Okano K, Mita K, Shimada T, Lee JM, Kawaguchi Y, Koga K, Kusakabe T. Role of the silkworm argonaute2 homolog gene in double-strand break repair of extrachromosomal DNA. Nucleci Acids Res. 2006 Feb 14;34:1092–101. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Robb GB, Brown KM, Khurana J, Rana TM. Spectific and potent RNAi in the nucleus of human cells. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2005 Feb;12:133–7. doi: 10.1038/nsmb886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Maniataki E, Mourelatos Z. Human mitochondrial tRNAMet is exported to the cytoplasm and associates with the Argonaute2 protein. RNA. 2005 Jun;11:849–52. doi: 10.1261/rna.2210805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kiriakidou M, Tan GS, Lamprinaki S, De Planell-Saguer M, Nelson PT, Mourelatos Z. An mRNA m7G cap binding-like mitif within human Ago2 represses translation. Cell. 2007 Jun 15;129:1141–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rudel S, Flatley A, Weinmann L, Kremmer E, Meister G. A multifunctional human Argonaute2-specific monocional antibody. RNA. 2008 Jun;14:1244–53. doi: 10.1261/rna.973808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang B, Pan X, Cobb GP, Anderson TA. microRNAs as oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Dev Biol. 2007 Feb 1;302:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Deng S, Calin GA, Croce CM, Coukos G, Zhang L. Mechanlisms of microRNA deregulation in human cancer. Cell Cycle. 2008 Sep 1;7:2643–6. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.17.6597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wu W, Sun M, Zou GM, Chen J. MicroRNA and cancer: current status and prospective. Int J Cancer. 2007 Mar 1;120:953–60. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fillipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N. Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Feb;9:102–14. doi: 10.1038/nrg2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Calin GA, Sevignani C, Dumitru CD, Hyslop T, Noch E, Yendamuri S, Shimizu M, Rattan S, Bullrich F, Negrini M, Croce CM. Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004 Mar 2;101:2999–3004. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307323101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Muralidhar B, Goldstein LD, Ng G, Winder DM, Palmer RD, Gooding EL, Barbosa-Morais NL, Mukherjee G, Thorne NP, Roberts I, Pett MR, Coleman N. Global microRNA profiles in cervical squamous cell carcinoma depend on Drosha expression levels. J Pathol. 2007 Aug;212:368–77. doi: 10.1002/path.2179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chiosea S, Jelezcova E, Chandran U, Luo J, Mantha G, Sobol RW, Dacic S. Overexpression of Dicer in precursor lesions of lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2007 Mar 1;67:2345–50. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chiosea S, Jelezcova E, Chandran U, Acquafondata M, McHale T, Sobol RW, Dhir R. Up-regulation of dicer, a component of the MicroRNA machinery, in prostate adenocarcinoma. Am J Pathol. 2006 Nov;169:1812–20. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hill DA, Ivanovich J, Priest JR, Gurnett CA, Dehner LP, Desruisseau D, Jarzembowski JA, Wikenheiser-Brokamp KA, Suarez BK, Whelan AJ, Williams G, Bracamontes D, Messinger Y, Goodfellow PJ. DICER1 mutations in familial pleuropulmonary blastoma. Science. 2009 Aug 21;325:965. doi: 10.1126/science.1174334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kallioniemi OP, Wagner U, Kononen J, Sauter G. Tissue microarray technology for high-throughput molecular profiling of cncer. Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Apr;10:657–62. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.7.657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mucci NR, Akdas G, Manely S, Rubin MA. Neuroendocrine expression in metastatic prostate cancer:evaluation of high throughput tissue microarrays to detect heterogeneous protein expression. Hum Pathol. 2000 Apr;31:406–14. doi: 10.1053/hp.2000.7295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Schraml P, Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Moch H, Bissig H, Nocito A, Mihatsch MJ, Kallioniemi OP, Sauter G. Tissue microarrays for gene amplification surveys in many different tumor types. Clin Cancer Res. 1999 Aug;5:1966–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Richter J, Wagner U, Kononen J, Fijan A, Bruderer J, Schmid U, Ackermann D, Maurer R, Alund G, Knonagel H, Rist M, Wilber K, Anabitarte M, Hering F, Hardmeier T, Schonenberger A, Flury R, Jager P, Fehr JL, Schraml P, Moch H, Mihatsch MJ, Gasser T, Kallioniemi OP, Sauter G. High-throughput tissue microarray analysis of cyclin E gene amplification and overexpression in urinary bladder cancer. Am J Pathol. 2000 Sep;157:787–94. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)64592-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lynch HT, Smyrk TC. Identifying hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998 May 21;338:1537–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199805213382109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Adams BD, Claffey KP, White BA. Argonaute-2 expression is regulated by epidermal growth factor receptor and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and correlates with a transformed phenotype in breast cancer cells. Endocrinology. 2009 Jan;150:14–23. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Yoo NJ, Hur SY, Kim MS, Lee JY, Lee SH. Immunohistochemical analysis of RNA-induced silencing complex-related proteins AGO2 and TNRC6A in prostate and esophageal cancers. APMIS. 2010 Apr;118:271–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02588.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Paukku K, Kalkkinen N, Silvennoinen O, Kontula KK, Lehtonen JY. p100 increases AT1R expression through interaction with AT1R 3’-UTR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Aug;36:4474–87. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tsuchiya N, Ochiai M, Nakashima K, Ubagai T, Sugimura T, Nakagama H. SND1, a component of RNA-induced silencing complex, is up-regulated in human colon cancers and implicated in early stage colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2007 Oct 1;67:9568–76. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kuruma H, Kamata Y, Takahashi H, Igarashi K, Kimura T, Miki K, Miki J, Sasaki H, Hayashi N, Egawa S. Staphylococcal nuclease domain-containing protein 1 as a potential tissue marker for prostate cancer. Am J Pathol. 2009 Jun;174:2044–50. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lan Li, Chaohui Yu, Hengjun Gao, Youming Li. Argonaute proteins: potential biomarkers for human colon cancer. BMC Cancer. 2010 Feb 10;10:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

