Skip to main content
NCBI home page
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 6.
Published in final edited form as: Development. 2012 Nov;139(22):4232–4238. doi: 10.1242/dev.081901

GATA2 provides an early anterior bias and uncovers a global positioning system for polarity in the amniote embryo

Federica Bertocchini 1,*,†, Claudio D Stern 1,‡
PMCID: PMC3565152  EMSID: EMS51676  PMID: 23093427

Abstract

The first axis to be specified during vertebrate development is that between the site where gastrulation will begin and the opposite pole of the embryo (dorso-ventral axis in amphibians and fish, anterior-posterior in amniotes). This relies on Nodal activity, but different vertebrates differ in how this activity is positioned. In chick, the earliest known asymmetry is posterior expression of the TGFβ-related factor Vg1, close to the future Nodal expression domain. Here we show that the transcription factor GATA2 is expressed anteriorly before this stage. GATA2 influences the site of primitive streak formation and its role is independent from, and upstream of, Vg1 and Wnt. However while Vg1 is required for streak formation, GATA2 does not act as an absolute anterior specifier, but provides an anterior bias. These findings point to previously unsuspected global determinants of polarity of the early amniote embryo.

Keywords: embryonic polarity, GATA factors, chick embryo, gastrulation, primitive streak formation, Nodal, Vg1, GDF-1, embryonic regulation, regeneration

Introduction

In most vertebrates, the site at which gastrulation is initiated is specified by cell interactions mainly involving Nodal-related signals in cooperation with the canonical (β-catenin-dependent) Wnt pathway. However, different animals differ in how they achieve the localization of these signals at the correct location: in Xenopus embryos this is dependent on maternal determinants: nuclear localization of β-catenin specifies “dorsal” (Houston and Wylie, 2004) whereas maternal RNAs encoding the transcription factor VegT (Zhang and King, 1996; Zhang et al., 1998; Kofron et al., 1999; Mir et al., 2007) and the TGFβ-related factor Vg1 (Weeks and Melton, 1987; Thomsen and Melton, 1993; Birsoy et al., 2006) specify “vegetal” identity. Their overlap defines the Nieuwkoop Centre, the first signalling centre of the embryo, which in turn induces the formation of the Spemann organizer at the site where gastrulation begins, the future dorsal lip of the blastopore. Induction of the Spemann organizer requires Nodal activity together with canonical Wnt. Similar interactions occur in teleosts, where Nodal- and Wnt-related signals specify the embryonic shield as the site where gastrulation begins at the margin of the embryo during early epiboly (Gritsman et al., 1999; Schier, 2003).

In amniotes, maternal determinants appear to exist, such as the δ-ooplasm of the sub-blastodermal yolk (nucleus of Pander) which may determine asymmetries in formation of the primitive endoderm (Callebaut et al., 2000). However these maternal factors must be much less important than in frogs and fish, because amniote embryos retain the ability to regulate (or “regenerate” the entire body) for a very long time after fertilization (Stern & Downs, 2012). For example if a chick embryo is cut into several fragments right up to the start of primitive streak formation (when it may have 20,000-50,000 cells), each fragment can initiate the formation of a complete axis (Lutz, 1949; Spratt and Haas, 1960). This property can also account for the formation of monozygotic twins (including most types of conjoined, or “Siamese”, twins) in humans and other primates, which are thought to be able to arise late in development (Enders, 2002a; Kaufman, 2004), and for the obligate monozygotic quadruplets seen in some species of armadillo (Enders, 2002b; Eakin and Behringer, 2004). Apart from these cases, most amniote embryos generate only a single axis, implying that there must be mechanisms both to determine the orientation of the future axis and to prevent twinning. We still know relatively little about these mechanisms. It is generally believed that the posterior end of the embryo (from where the primitive streak will arise) contains the main signals.

The earliest known marker of embryonic polarity in the chick is transcriptional activation of Vg1, which is localized in the posterior marginal zone, the functional equivalent of the Nieuwkoop Centre (Azar and Eyal-Giladi, 1979; Khaner et al., 1985; Khaner and Eyal-Giladi, 1986; Khaner and Eyal-Giladi, 1989; Shah et al., 1997; Bachvarova et al., 1998; Khaner, 1998; Bertocchini and Stern, 2002; Bertocchini et al., 2004; Stern, 2004). In turn, Vg1 and Wnt cooperate to induce transcription of Nodal around the site where the primitive streak arises (Skromne and Stern, 2001; Skromne and Stern, 2002; Stern, 2004). In the mouse, Nodal transcripts are not localized posteriorly but the position of primitive streak formation relies on the removal of Nodal antagonists (Cerberus-like and Lefty1) from the site at which the streak will arise, due to migration of the Visceral Endoderm (Perea-Gomez et al., 2001; Perea-Gomez et al., 2002; Tam and Gad, 2004; Yamamoto et al., 2004; Stern and Downs, 2012). Thus, localization of Nodal activity at the site where gastrulation is initiated is the common feature of all vertebrates. Partly for this reason it is generally assumed that the main initial determinants of polarity must reside close to this region (“dorsally” in anamniotes, “posteriorly” in amniotes).

Here we show that the transcription factor GATA2 is expressed at the anterior (“anti-gastrular”) pole in the chick before Vg1 appears posteriorly. GATA2 influences the site of primitive streak formation and its role is independent from, and upstream of, Vg1 and Wnt. GATA2 does not act as an absolute anterior specifier, but rather provides an anterior bias for embryo polarity and appears to cooperate with other factors to position Vg1 expression posteriorly. These findings point to previously unsuspected global determinants of polarity of the early amniote embryo and suggest that the earliest asymmetry in the chick embryo may reside anteriorly rather than close to the site of primitive streak formation.

Materials and Methods

Fertile hens’ eggs were obtained from Henry Stewart & Co. (UK) and Granja Gibert (Spain) (Brown Bovan Gold) and staged in Roman numerals for pre-primitive streak stages (Eyal-Giladi and Kochav, 1976) and in Arabic numerals (Hamburger and Hamilton, 1951) starting from stage 2, when the primitive streak appears. Embryos were cultured in modified New culture (New, 1955; Stern and Ireland, 1981). In situ hybridisation and whole mount immunohistochemistry were carried out as described (Stern, 1998), using probes: chick Bmp4 (Liem et al., 1995), Brachyury (Kispert et al., 1995a; Kispert et al., 1995b; Knezevic et al., 1997), Gata2 and Gata3 (Sheng and Stern, 1999), Nodal/cNR-1 (Levin et al., 1995), Vg1 (Shah et al., 1997), Wnt8c (Hume and Dodd, 1993) and Chordin (Streit et al., 1998). Fluorescein-labelled morpholinos (MO) against Gata2, Gata3, Vg1 and a standard control morpholino (Gene Tools Inc.) were delivered to young embryos by electroporation as described (Voiculescu et al., 2007; Voiculescu et al., 2008). GATA2-MO was designed to target the first splicing site: GGGATGCTCATT-TACCGTGTGCCTG. GATA3-MO targeted the initial ATG: AGACCTCCATCTTCCGCG (Linker et al., 2009). Vg1-MO was designed to target the initial ATG: GAGGCCACCACATCGC. For Vg1 misexpression experiments, we transplanted COS cells transfected with a cVg1-dorsalin construct; pellets of 500 or 1000 cells were generated from hanging drops and grafted into host embryos as previously described (Shah et al., 1997; Streit et al., 1998; Skromne and Stern, 2001; Skromne and Stern, 2002).

Results

Vg1 is required for axis formation

Previous studies (Seleiro et al., 1996; Shah et al., 1997) revealed that the gene encoding Vg1, a Nodal/Activin-related protein, is normally expressed in the posterior marginal zone of the chick embryo, and that its misexpression elsewhere in the marginal zone is sufficient to induce the formation of an ectopic, complete embryonic axis. However it is unknown whether Vg1 is essential for normal axis formation. To assess this we electroporated Vg1 morpholino in the normal expression domain of this gene (Fig. 1A). While control morpholino electroporated embryos were unaffected (n=0/21 embryos with abnormalities; Fig. 1B), Vg1 morpholino severely affected axis formation. In 9/23 (39%) embryos, the primitive streak arose from one or more ectopic sites, either adjacent to the original posterior (Fig. 1 E-F), or from multiple sites, sometimes resulting in brachyury expression around most of the circumference of the area pellucida (Fig. 1 C-D). A further 5/23 embryos (22%; Fig. 1 G-H) failed to form a primitive streak altogether. To test that the effects of the morpholino are specific, we performed a rescue experiment using a pellet of cVg1-transfected COS cells grafted adjacent to the Vg1-Morpholino-electroporated cells. This rescued primitive streak formation from the site of ectopic Vg1 (18/24 rescued, 75%; of these, 5 had an ectopic streak in addition to the rescued one) (Fig. 1 I-J), whereas control COS cells were unable to rescue (0/27 embryos rescued; 12/27 embryos affected by the Morpholino) (Fig. 1 K-L). Thus, Vg1 expression in the posterior marginal zone is required for normal axis formation.

Figure 1. Vg1 is required for axis formation.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Vg1 morpholino was electroporated in the future posterior part of stage X embryos (A). After overnight incubation, embryos were hybridized with Brachyury and photographed (C, E, G, I, K) before immunostaining with anti-fluorescein antibody and photographing again (B, D, F, H, J, L). The Brachyury signal appears blue and the Morpholino brown. Embryos electroporated with standard control morpholino developed normally (B), whereas Vg1-MO caused the primitive streak (Brachyury expressing) to arise from one or more ectopic sites, either adjacent to the original posterior (E-F), or sometimes extending around most of the circumference of the area pellucida (C-D). These effects of Vg1 morpholino can be rescued by implanting a pellet of Vg1-transfected COS cells (I, J) but not with control mock-transfected COS cells (K, L) into the posterior marginal zone, adjacent to the morpholino-electroporated cells. The position of the grafted pellet is outlined by a circle in I and K.

Gata2 expression is complementary to, and begins earlier than, Vg1

In many of the embryos of the above Vg1-knockdown experiment that do form a streak, the ectopic streak arises close to the original Vg1-expressing domain, rather than randomly in the embryo. This suggests the existence of other determinants of polarity in addition to Vg1. The transcription factors Gata2 and Gata3 are good candidates because they are expressed anteriorly at primitive streak and earlier stages (Sheng and Stern, 1999). We therefore examined the time-course of Gata2 and −3 and Vg1 expression by in situ hybridization. To obtain very young embryos we used eggs laid in Winter, some of which are at stages VIII-IX (Eyal-Giladi and Kochav, 1976). At these stages, Gata2 is expressed weakly and ubiquitously in the area pellucida, marginal zone and inner part of the area opaca (Fig. 2A). After a few hours’ incubation (stage IX), expression becomes more asymmetric, clearing from one side of the posterior area pellucida, marginal zone and area opaca but remaining elsewhere (Fig. 2B). In the absence of other clear markers of polarity we cannot be certain of the orientation of these embryos, but at stage X, Gata2 expression becomes more obviously graded, with its highest level anteriorly, decreasing posteriorly and with no expression visible in the posterior part of the embryo (Fig. 2C). By stage XIII, Gata2 transcripts appear in the posterior extraembryonic region as well, although at low levels (not shown; see (Sheng and Stern, 1999). At early streak stages, the Gata2 expression domain includes the posterior primitive streak (Sheng and Stern, 1999). Vg1 expression is not detectable until stage X, when it is confined to the posterior marginal zone (Fig. 2D), where it remains until primitive streak formation; thereafter it is expressed in the posterior streak (Shah et al., 1997). Comparison between Gata2 and Vg1 at stage X-XIII therefore reveals striking complementarity, with Vg1 expressed in the posterior marginal zone, where Gata2 is absent but at later stages the two genes partly overlap in the posterior streak (not shown). Gata3 transcripts were reported to be expressed anteriorly but not until stage 4 (Sheng and Stern, 1999). To confirm this we examined embryos at earlier stages; we did not detect any expression prior to the primitive streak stage (Supplementary Fig. 1). These observations make GATA2 a good candidate determinant of anterior polarity.

Figure 2. Gata2 and Vg1 expression pattern in the early embryo.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Gata2 expression (A-C) begins very early and gradually becomes restricted to one side (the future anterior region) of the early chick embryo. Vg1 expression (D) starts at stage X in the posterior marginal zone and is complementary to Gata2. The stage (Eyal-Giladi and Kochav, 1976) of each embryo is indicated in Roman numerals on the lower right.

GATA2 influences the polarity of axis formation

To test the hypothesis that GATA2 may act as an anterior determinant, we electroporated morpholino (MO) against Gata2 into the normal expression domain of this gene (Fig. 3A). 5/46 embryos (11%; Fig. 3 C) displayed a double primitive streak and a further 15/46 (33%) contained a single streak arising from an ectopic site (in some cases the remnant of the original streak was still visible as a faint brachyury-expressing region; e.g. Fig. 3B). In contrast, most embryos electroporated with control morpholinos were normal (Fig. 3D) (90/92; 1 had a displaced streak and 1 had a double streak). It is conceivable that GATA3 may partly compensate for GATA2 in this experiment. To cover this possibility, we co-electroporated morpholinos directed against Gata2 and Gata3. This enhanced the effect as compared to Gata2-MO alone, but only slightly (3/15 [20%] with double streaks, 5/15 [33%] with displaced streak). Although these results suggest that GATA2/3 factors are anterior determinants of embryonic polarity, the position of the ectopic axes forming in this experiment suggest more complexity than the idea of GATA2/3 being a simple inhibitor. Indeed, in about half of the embryos with an ectopic streak, the streak arose not in the middle of the domain where GATA had been knocked down, but at one edge of this domain (eg. Fig. 3B).

Figure 3. Gata2 morpholino causes upregulation of primitive streak markers and ectopic axis formation.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(A) Gata2 morpholino was electroporated in the future posterior part of stage X EG&K embryos. Embryos incubated overnight (B, C) developed an ectopic primitive streak (arrows) as revealed by Brachyury expression, whereas embryos electroporated with control morpholinos develop normally (D). Embryos cultured for 6 (E-J) to 8 hours (K-M) showed upregulation of markers that indicate axis formation, as Vg1 (E, F), Wnt8c (H, I), and Nodal (K, L). Controls showed normal expression of these markers (G, J, M).

The formation of ectopic streaks in GATA knockdown experiments could be explained either by GATA factors acting upstream of other factors known to be involved in primitive streak formation, such as Vg1 and Wnt8C and their target Nodal, (Hume and Dodd, 1993; Levin et al., 1995; Skromne and Stern, 2001; Bertocchini and Stern, 2002; Skromne and Stern, 2002). Alternatively GATA may act downstream of these factors or through an unrelated mechanism. To test this, we examined the expression of Vg1, Wnt8C and Nodal 6-8 hours after electroporation of Gata2/3-MOs. Vg1 was expressed ectopically (Fig. 3 E-G); occasionally, it was upregulated all around the marginal zone. Wnt8C was also expressed ectopically (Fig. 3 H-J), losing its posterior bias and occasionally upregulated all around. Both of these markers were affected 6 hours after Gata-MO electroporation: for Vg1, 21/52 (40%) embryos showed ectopic expression and 6/52 (11.5%) had no expression (1/59 controls had ectopic Vg1 expression, the rest were normal; Fig. 3G). For Wnt8C 5/13 (38%) had ectopic expression (1/35 controls had ectopic expression and 5/35 [14%] had no expression; Fig. 3J). Nodal transcripts were also affected but only after 8 hours following Gata2/3-MO electroporation (7/17, 41% with ectopic expression, compared to 1/51 controls with ectopic expression and 2/51 with no expression) (Fig. 3 K-M). Finally, it is possible that GATA knockdown could either induce an ectopic Koller’s sickle, or somehow attract sickle cells from the posterior end of the embryo. Although unlikely, we tested this using Chordin as a marker for the sickle after electroporation of GATA2/3-MO; neither ectopic expression nor extension of the endogenous domain was seen (Supplementary Fig. 2). Together, these results suggest that GATA2/3 factors act upstream of Vg1/Wnt and Nodal. GATA may therefore influence polarity in the early embryo, perhaps contributing to position the initial expression of Vg1 and Wnt8C in their normal domains.

GATA2/3 and embryonic regulation

When a pre-streak stage embryo is cut into anterior and posterior halves and these cultured separately, both can generate an embryonic axis (Lutz, 1949; Spratt and Haas, 1960; Bertocchini et al., 2004). The anterior half does not express Vg1 at the time of cutting but Vg1 begins to be transcribed after 8-9 hours at either the left or the right edge of the margin adjacent to the cut (Bertocchini et al., 2004). That this new expression domain is restricted to the most posterior part of the anterior half is consistent with the idea presented above that the graded expression of Gata factors (decreasing posteriorly at early stages) might act as an anterior determinant, regulating the expression of Vg1. The anterior half of an embryo should therefore constitute a sensitised assay for testing the role of GATA factors: we expected GATA knockdown at the most anterior edge of an isolated anterior half to cause the formation of an axis within the area where GATA has been knocked down. Surprisingly, electroporation of Gata2-MO at the anterior edge of an isolated anterior half does not cause a primitive streak to form from the anterior electroporated cells, but still appears from one side of the anterior half (16/29 [55%] with an axis from a lateral region, 13/29 [45%] with no streak; Fig. 4 A-C). Like the previous experiments, this result suggests that GATA provides a bias for polarity but is not an absolute determinant.

Figure 4. Gata2 and embryonic regulation.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

A. Gata2 morpholino was electroporated at the anteriormost pole of an isolated anterior half. B-C. After overnight incubation, a primitive streak does not develop from the electroporated region, but still forms from one side (unpredictable; two examples shown in B and C) of the posterior region (brachyury in situ hybridization signal in purple, anti-Fluorescein [morpholino] stained brown). D-F. When Gata2 morpholino is electroporated at a lateral edge of an isolated anterior half (D), a primitive streak forms most often from the electroporated side (two examples shown in E and F). G-J. Analysis of Gata2 expression pattern with respect to axis formation (Chordin expression) in isolated anterior halves. G is a diagram summarising the experiment and the results obtained (G): Gata2 is first upregulated all around the circumference (H), then downregulated (black arrows in I, J) between 8-11 hours, just as Chordin starts to be expressed (pink arrows in I, J).

To test this bias in a different assay, we tested the effect of GATA2 knockdown on one side of the posterior edge of the anterior half. If our hypothesis is correct we would expect primitive streak formation from the electroporated site, where Gata is downregulated. Indeed, the primitive steak forms mainly from the electroporated side: 13/17 (76%) embryos had a streak arising from the electroporated side, 2/17 had no streak, 1/17 formed 2 streaks and 1/17 formed a streak from the opposite side (Fig. 4 D-F). In contrast, anterior halves electroporated with a control morpholino showed no lateral bias: 6/34 (18%) formed a streak from the same side, 7/34 (21%) from the opposite side, 17/34 (50%) had no streak and 3/34 (9%) developed two streaks. As an additional test of the role of Vg1 in axis formation in isolated halves, we electroporated Vg1 morpholino on one side of the anterior half – if Vg1 is important, this would be expected to produce a streak mainly from the opposite side. In the experiment, 9/20 (45%) produced a streak from the opposite side, 4/20 (20%) did not form a streak, 2/20 (10%) formed two streaks and 3/20 (15%) formed a streak from the electroporated side (not shown). Thus, GATA2 and Vg1 have opposite effects as determinants of embryo polarity, but the effects of GATA2 are stronger during embryonic regulation (regeneration) than in normal, intact embryos.

Gata2 and Vg1 expression controlled by a “global positioning system”

The above findings suggest that GATA2 is initially expressed as a gradient, strongest anteriorly, prior to the appearance of Vg1 transcripts in the posterior marginal zone. Then (stage XI-XII), GATA2 transcripts clear from the posterior domain where Vg1 is expressed. This raises the possibility that at this stage, Vg1 inhibits Gata2 expression locally. To test this we misexpressed Vg1 in the anterior marginal zone, and studied the effect on Gata2 expression after 4-8 hours’ incubation: Gata2 expression was unaffected (0/27) (not shown), suggesting that Gata2 expression is independent from Vg1.

In an isolated anterior half, Vg1 expression appears on one side of the posterior edge about 9 hours after cutting (Bertocchini et al., 2004). Does Gata2 expression also change in the anterior half? Surprisingly, Gata2 expression becomes radial in the marginal zone/area opaca before Vg1 is activated (about 6-7 hours after cutting) (Fig. 4H); at 9 hours, Gata2 expression becomes undetectable on one side of the posterior region, where some cells of the embryonic area start to express Chordin, a marker for the organizer and its precursor cells (Fig. 4I). By 11 hours (when the axis starts to form), Chordin expression becomes localized in a region of the area pellucida facing the zone devoid of Gata2 expression (Fig. 4J). This result suggests that Gata2 is radially expressed at first, but downregulated at about the same time as the onset of Vg1 expression. Thus, the isolated anterior half appears to recapitulate the events of very early stages of development (at stages VIII-XI; Fig. 2). Although Vg1 and Gata2 appear to influence each other to some extent, the onset and maintenance of their expression seem to be controlled independently, suggesting the existence of a “global positioning system” throughout the embryo, responsible for localising the domains of expression of both genes.

GATA acts through secreted factors of the TGFβ family

The non-cell-autonomous effects of GATA2-knockdown (e.g. Fig. 3B) suggest that expression of a secreted factor might be controlled by GATA. One possibility is that Vg1 expression is repressed by GATA. To test this, we analysed Vg1 expression after electroporating GATA-MO on one side of an isolated anterior half (as in Fig. 4D): 8/22 (36%) cases showed Vg1 expression only from the electroporated side (Supplementary Fig. 3 A-B), none from the opposite side (0%), 4 had expression on both sides (18%), 3 showed diffuse, weak expression (14%) and 7 showed no expression (32%). After Control-MO electroporation 3/12 (25%) anterior halves showed Vg1 on the same side, 3 from the opposite side (25%), 1 on both sides (8%), and 5 (42%) showed no expression. These results suggest that GATA2/3 knockdown slightly upregulates Vg1 expression after 9 hours, but this effect is much less marked than the consequences on axis development.

Other candidate targets of GATA are likely to be members of the BMP family. To test the possibility that GATA2 may act through BMP, we examined the effects of GATA2/3-MO electroporation (within its normal anterior expression domain) on expression of BMP4, 6 hours after cutting: 13/34 embryos (38%) showed downregulation of BMP4 expression in the electoporated region (Supplementary Fig. 3 C-D). In contrast, 0/30 embryos showed downregulation after Control-Morpholino electroporation (Supplementary Fig. 3 E-F). Thus, the site of primitive streak formation may be determined by a balance between Vg1/Nodal-related (Smad2 activation) signals from the posterior margin and BMP-related (Smad1 activation), highest anteriorly and controlled indirectly by GATA, by regulation of BMP expression.

Discussion

Our results suggest the existence of anterior cues that contribute to establish embryo polarity before gastrulation in the chick embryo. Previoulsy, it was generally believed that the main, if not the only, cues for polarity reside posteriorly, the earliest one of which known to date being Vg1 (Seleiro et al., 1996; Shah et al., 1997). Here we show that GATA factors are expressed anteriorly even before the appearance of Vg1 in the posterior marginal zone. Surprisingly however, GATA2 downregulation in intact embryos does not immediately induce Vg1, nor does Vg1 misexpression immediately downregulate GATA2, suggesting that these opposing cues are under independent control. This raises the possibility that the entire embryo is patterned at a very early stage by instructions that almost simultaneously specify anterior (GATA-expressing) and posterior (Vg1-expressing) parts of the marginal zone, as if there is an embryo-wide coordinate system specifying cell position (“global positioning system”) responsible for localised expression of these factors at opposite ends of the embryo. The nature of the upstream regulators specifying the global coordinate system is unknown; the present study suggests that factors should be sought that can regulate gene expression throughout the embryo.

To date, chick embryos have been the main amniote model system for the study of embryonic regulation. In mouse, the earliest markers of embryonic polarity appear to be mainly localised posteriorly but since it is impossible to predict the orientation of the embryo with accuracy before primitive streak formation, this is difficult to confirm (Tam and Behringer, 1997; Tam and Gad, 2004). Rabbit and other non-rodent mammals have been described to have a distinctive anterior region (“anterior marginal crescent”, “anterior pregastrulation differentiation”, or “anti-sickle”) that can be defined morphologically (Viebahn et al., 1995; Hassoun et al., 2009), but no specific molecular components have yet been described that presage the future axis and act as anterior determinants. It will be interesting to explore the expression of GATA factors in eutherian mammals to determine whether, as in the chick, they may represent very early markers of anterior (“anti-gastrular”) position.

The non-cell-autonomous effects of GATA2-knockdown suggested the involvement of a secreted factor controlled by GATA. Although we observed a mild effect of GATA knockdown on expression of Vg1, this effect is much less pronounced than that on axis development. We therefore explored the BMP family. There is evidence that BMPs may lie both up- and downstream of GATA. First, GATA2/3 genes can be downstream targets of BMP and dowregulated by Smad2-dependent Activin/Nodal signals (Walmsley et al., 1994; Neave et al., 1995; Read et al., 1998). At the same time, GATA factors can lie upstream of BMPs, whose expression they can upregulate (Sykes et al., 1998; Loose and Patient, 2004; Linker et al., 2009). There is also evidence that BMP activity can influence embryo polarity: misexpression of BMP4 posteriorly in the chick blastoderm can suppress primitive streak formation, while the BMP antagonist Chordin can induce an ectopic primitive streak right up to the start of gastrulation (Streit et al., 1998; Streit and Stern, 1999). Our results suggest that GATA2 may act at least in part by modulating BMP.

It was recently argued that embryonic regulation in Xenopus is controlled by BMP-related signals at opposite poles (dorsal and ventral) of the embryo – dorsally the main signal is ADMP, whereas ventrally BMP2, 4 and 7 predominate (Reversade and De Robertis, 2005). It was proposed that both dorsal and ventral poles are under some sort of global control, and that this is due to BMP-related molecules acting over a considerable distance, based on the observation that depletion of BMP2/4/7 ventrally causes upregulation of ADMP dorsally. However it is important to point out that anuran amphibians are only capable of full embryonic regulation until the third cleavage division (8 cell stage), whereas in the chick the entire embryo can regenerate from any fragment isolated as late as the blastoderm stage (Spratt and Haas, 1960). Our findings suggest that, despite the differences between amniotes and anamniotes in the extent to which they are capable of embryonic regulation, BMPs may have a conserved role in global patterning of the embryo. A particular challenge for the future will be to discover the signals upstream of Vg1 and GATA2, responsible for positioning them at opposite ends of the axis of gastrulation.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Fig. 1

Supplementary Fig. 1. Gata3 is not expressed before primitive streak formation. In situ hybridisation for Gata3 at pre-streak stages X (A) and XIII (B) show no expression, whereas embryos at stage 5− (C) show expression in the prospective epidermis, as previously reported (Sheng and Stern, 1999).

Supplementary Fig. 2

Supplementary Fig. 2. To test whether GATA knockdown could either induce an ectopic Koller’s sickle, or somehow attract sickle cells, GATA2/3 morpholinos were electroporated anteriorly (anti-fluorescein, brown) and embryos examined for ectopic expression of Chordin which at this stage is specific for the sickle (purple). Neither ectopic expression nor an extension of the endogenous domain into the electroporated region was seen. The embryo shown is at stage XIII.

Supplementary Fig. 4

Supplementary Fig. 3. Epistasis experiments to test whether GATA acts through induction of Vg1 (A, B) or BMP4 (C-F). A, B: GATA-MO was electroporated into the anterior half of an embryo (experimental design as in Fig. 4D), and expression of Vg1 examined after 9 hours. An example is shown after in situ hybridisation for Vg1 (A) and the same case after staining with anti-fluorescein to reveal the morpholino-electroporated cells (B). In this case, Vg1 is upregulated in the region where GATA was knocked-down. C-F. GATA-MO (C-D) or Control-MO (E-F) was electroporated anteriorly in an intact embryo and BMP4 expression examined 6 hours later. GATA-MO causes slight downregulation of BMP4 expression (C-D) as compared to the control (E-F).

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by grants from the BBSRC and European Research Council (ERC) to CDS and Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation to FB. FB is a Ramon y Cajal Fellow. We are grateful to Andrea Streit and Marian Ros for helpful comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Azar Y, Eyal-Giladi H. Marginal zone cells--the primitive streak-inducing component of the primary hypoblast in the chick. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1979;52:79–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bachvarova RF, Skromne I, Stern CD. Induction of primitive streak and Hensen’s node by the posterior marginal zone in the early chick embryo. Development. 1998;125(17):3521–34. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.17.3521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertocchini F, Skromne I, Wolpert L, Stern CD. Determination of embryonic polarity in a regulative system: evidence for endogenous inhibitors acting sequentially during primitive streak formation in the chick embryo. Development. 2004;131(14):3381–90. doi: 10.1242/dev.01178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertocchini F, Stern CD. The hypoblast of the chick embryo positions the primitive streak by antagonizing nodal signaling. Dev Cell. 2002;3(5):735–44. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00318-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Birsoy B, Kofron M, Schaible K, Wylie C, Heasman J. Vg1 is an essential signaling molecule in Xenopus development. Development. 2006;133(1):15–20. doi: 10.1242/dev.02144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Callebaut M, Van Nueten E, Harrisson F, Bortier H. Activation of avian embryo formation by unfertilized quail germ discs: comparison with early amphibian development. Reprod Nutr Dev. 2000;40(6):597–606. doi: 10.1051/rnd:2000139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eakin GS, Behringer RR. Gastrulation in other mammals and humans. In: Stern CD, editor. Gastrulation: from cells to embryo. Cold Spring Harbor Press; New York: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  8. Enders AC. Formation of monozygotic twins: when does it occur? Placenta. 2002a;23(2-3):236–8. doi: 10.1053/plac.2001.0755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Enders AC. Implantation in the nine-banded armadillo: how does a single blastocyst form four embryos? Placenta. 2002b;23(1):71–85. doi: 10.1053/plac.2001.0753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eyal-Giladi H, Kochav S. From cleavage to primitive streak formation: a complementary normal table and a new look at the first stages of the development of the chick. I. General morphology. Dev Biol. 1976;49(2):321–37. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90178-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gritsman K, Zhang J, Cheng S, Heckscher E, Talbot WS, Schier AF. The EGF-CFC protein one-eyed pinhead is essential for nodal signaling. Cell. 1999;97(1):121–32. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80720-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol. 1951;88:49–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hassoun R, Schwartz P, Feistel K, Blum M, Viebahn C. Axial differentiation and early gastrulation stages of the pig embryo. Differentiation; research in biological diversity. 2009;78(5):301–11. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Houston DW, Wylie C. The role of Wnts in gastrulation. In: Stern CD, editor. Gastrulation: from cells to embryo. Cold Spring Harbor Press; New York: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hume CR, Dodd J. Cwnt-8C: a novel Wnt gene with a potential role in primitive streak formation and hindbrain organization. Development. 1993;119(4):1147–60. doi: 10.1242/dev.119.4.1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kaufman MH. The embryology of conjoined twins. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20(8-9):508–25. doi: 10.1007/s00381-004-0985-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Khaner O. The ability to initiate an axis in the avian blastula is concentrated mainly at a posterior site. Dev Biol. 1998;194(2):257–66. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Khaner O, Eyal-Giladi H. The embryo-forming potency of the posterior marginal zone in stages X through XII of the chick. Dev Biol. 1986;115(2):275–81. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90248-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Khaner O, Eyal-Giladi H. The chick’s marginal zone and primitive streak formation. I. Coordinative effect of induction and inhibition. Dev Biol. 1989;134(1):206–14. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(89)90090-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Khaner O, Mitrani E, Eyal-Giladi H. Developmental potencies of area opaca and marginal zone areas of early chick blastoderms. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1985;89:235–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kispert A, Koschorz B, Herrmann BG. The T protein encoded by Brachyury is a tissue-specific transcription factor. Embo J. 1995a;14(19):4763–72. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00158.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kispert A, Ortner H, Cooke J, Herrmann BG. The chick Brachyury gene: developmental expression pattern and response to axial induction by localized activin. Dev Biol. 1995b;168(2):406–15. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1995.1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Knezevic V, De Santo R, Mackem S. Two novel chick T-box genes related to mouse Brachyury are expressed in different, non-overlapping mesodermal domains during gastrulation. Development. 1997;124(2):411–9. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.2.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kofron M, Demel T, Xanthos J, Lohr J, Sun B, Sive H, Osada S, Wright C, Wylie C, Heasman J. Mesoderm induction in Xenopus is a zygotic event regulated by maternal VegT via TGFbeta growth factors. Development. 1999;126(24):5759–70. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.24.5759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Levin M, Johnson RL, Stern CD, Kuehn M, Tabin C. A molecular pathway determining left-right asymmetry in chick embryogenesis. Cell. 1995;82(5):803–14. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90477-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liem KF, Jr., Tremml G, Roelink H, Jessell TM. Dorsal differentiation of neural plate cells induced by BMP-mediated signals from epidermal ectoderm. Cell. 1995;82(6):969–79. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90276-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Linker C, De Almeida I, Papanayotou C, Stower M, Sabado V, Ghorani E, Streit A, Mayor R, Stern CD. Cell communication with the neural plate is required for induction of neural markers by BMP inhibition: evidence for homeogenetic induction and implications for Xenopus animal cap and chick explant assays. Dev Biol. 2009;327(2):478–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.12.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Loose M, Patient R. A genetic regulatory network for Xenopus mesendoderm formation. Dev Biol. 2004;271(2):467–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lutz H. Sur la production expérimentale de la polyembryonie et de la monstruosité double chez les oiseaux. Arch. Anat. Microsc. Morphol. Exp. 1949;39:79–144. [Google Scholar]
  30. Mir A, Kofron M, Zorn AM, Bajzer M, Haque M, Heasman J, Wylie CC. FoxI1e activates ectoderm formation and controls cell position in the Xenopus blastula. Development. 2007;134(4):779–88. doi: 10.1242/dev.02768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Neave B, Rodaway A, Wilson SW, Patient R, Holder N. Expression of zebrafish GATA 3 (gta3) during gastrulation and neurulation suggests a role in the specification of cell fate. Mech Dev. 1995;51(2-3):169–82. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00351-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. New DAT. A new technique for the cultivation of the chick embryo in vitro. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 1955;3:326–331. [Google Scholar]
  33. Perea-Gomez A, Rhinn M, Ang SL. Role of the anterior visceral endoderm in restricting posterior signals in the mouse embryo. Int J Dev Biol. 2001;45(1):311–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Perea-Gomez A, Vella FD, Shawlot W, Oulad-Abdelghani M, Chazaud C, Meno C, Pfister V, Chen L, Robertson E, Hamada H, et al. Nodal antagonists in the anterior visceral endoderm prevent the formation of multiple primitive streaks. Dev Cell. 2002;3(5):745–56. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00321-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Read EM, Rodaway AR, Neave B, Brandon N, Holder N, Patient RK, Walmsley ME. Evidence for non-axial A/P patterning in the nonneural ectoderm of Xenopus and zebrafish pregastrula embryos. Int J Dev Biol. 1998;42(6):763–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Reversade B, De Robertis EM. Regulation of ADMP and BMP2/4/7 at opposite embryonic poles generates a self-regulating morphogenetic field. Cell. 2005;123(6):1147–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schier AF. Nodal signaling in vertebrate development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2003;19:589–621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.041603.094522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Seleiro EA, Connolly DJ, Cooke J. Early developmental expression and experimental axis determination by the chicken Vg1 gene. Curr Biol. 1996;6(11):1476–86. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(96)00752-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Shah SB, Skromne I, Hume CR, Kessler DS, Lee KJ, Stern CD, Dodd J. Misexpression of chick Vg1 in the marginal zone induces primitive streak formation. Development. 1997;124(24):5127–38. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.24.5127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sheng G, Stern CD. Gata2 and Gata3: novel markers for early embryonic polarity and for non-neural ectoderm in the chick embryo. Mech Dev. 1999;87(1-2):213–6. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00150-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Skromne I, Stern CD. Interactions between Wnt and Vg1 signalling pathways initiate primitive streak formation in the chick embryo. Development. 2001;128(15):2915–27. doi: 10.1242/dev.128.15.2915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Skromne I, Stern CD. A hierarchy of gene expression accompanying induction of the primitive streak by Vg1 in the chick embryo. Mech Dev. 2002;114:115–118. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00034-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Spratt NT, Haas H. Integrative mechanisms in development of the early chick blastoderm. I. Regulative potentiality of separated parts. J exp Zool. 1960;145:97–137. [Google Scholar]
  44. Stern CD. Detection of multiple gene products simultaneously by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in whole mounts of avian embryos. Current topics in developmental biology. 1998;36:223–243. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60505-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Stern CD. Gastrulation in the chick. In: Stern CD, editor. Gastrulation: from cells to embryo. Cold Spring Harbor Press; New York: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  46. Stern CD, Downs KM. The hypoblast (visceral endoderm): an evo-devo perspective. Development. 2012 doi: 10.1242/dev.070730. (in press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Stern CD, Ireland GW. An integrated experimental study of endoderm formation in avian embryos. Anat Embryol. 1981;163(3):245–63. doi: 10.1007/BF00315703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Streit A, Lee KJ, Woo I, Roberts C, Jessell TM, Stern CD. Chordin regulates primitive streak development and the stability of induced neural cells, but is not sufficient for neural induction in the chick embryo. Development. 1998;125(3):507–19. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.3.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Streit A, Stern CD. Mesoderm patterning and somite formation during node regression: differential effects of chordin and noggin. Mech Dev. 1999;85(1-2):85–96. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(99)00085-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sykes TG, Rodaway AR, Walmsley ME, Patient RK. Suppression of GATA factor activity causes axis duplication in Xenopus. Development. 1998;125(23):4595–605. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.23.4595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tam PP, Behringer RR. Mouse gastrulation: the formation of a mammalian body plan. Mech Dev. 1997;68(1-2):3–25. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(97)00123-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Tam PPL, Gad JL. Gastrulation in the mouse embryo. In: Stern CD, editor. Gastrulation: from cells to embryo. Cold Spring Harbor Press; New York: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  53. Thomsen GH, Melton DA. Processed Vg1 protein is an axial mesoderm inducer in Xenopus. Cell. 1993;74(3):433–41. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80045-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Viebahn C, Mayer B, Hrabe de Angelis M. Signs of the principle body axes prior to primitive streak formation in the rabbit embryo. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1995;192(2):159–69. doi: 10.1007/BF00186004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Voiculescu O, Bertocchini F, Wolpert L, Keller RE, Stern CD. The amniote primitive streak is defined by epithelial cell intercalation before gastrulation. Nature. 2007;449(7165):1049–52. doi: 10.1038/nature06211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Voiculescu O, Papanayotou C, Stern CD. Spatially and temporally controlled electroporation of early chick embryos. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(3):419–26. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Walmsley ME, Guille MJ, Bertwistle D, Smith JC, Pizzey JA, Patient RK. Negative control of Xenopus GATA-2 by activin and noggin with eventual expression in precursors of the ventral blood islands. Development. 1994;120(9):2519–29. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.9.2519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Weeks DL, Melton DA. A maternal mRNA localized to the vegetal hemisphere in Xenopus eggs condes for a growth factor related to TGF-beta. Cell. 1987;51(5):861–867. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90109-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yamamoto M, Saijoh Y, Perea-Gomez A, Shawlot W, Behringer RR, Ang SL, Hamada H, Meno C. Nodal antagonists regulate formation of the anteroposterior axis of the mouse embryo. Nature. 2004;428(6981):387–92. doi: 10.1038/nature02418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhang J, Houston DW, King ML, Payne C, Wylie C, Heasman J. The role of maternal VegT in establishing the primary germ layers in Xenopus embryos. Cell. 1998;94(4):515–24. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81592-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang J, King ML. Xenopus VegT RNA is localized to the vegetal cortex during oogenesis and encodes a novel T-box transcription factor involved in mesodermal patterning. Development. 1996;122(12):4119–29. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.12.4119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Fig. 1

Supplementary Fig. 1. Gata3 is not expressed before primitive streak formation. In situ hybridisation for Gata3 at pre-streak stages X (A) and XIII (B) show no expression, whereas embryos at stage 5− (C) show expression in the prospective epidermis, as previously reported (Sheng and Stern, 1999).

NIHMS51676-supplement-Supplementary_Fig__1.pdf (334.2KB, pdf)
Supplementary Fig. 2

Supplementary Fig. 2. To test whether GATA knockdown could either induce an ectopic Koller’s sickle, or somehow attract sickle cells, GATA2/3 morpholinos were electroporated anteriorly (anti-fluorescein, brown) and embryos examined for ectopic expression of Chordin which at this stage is specific for the sickle (purple). Neither ectopic expression nor an extension of the endogenous domain into the electroporated region was seen. The embryo shown is at stage XIII.

NIHMS51676-supplement-Supplementary_Fig__2.pdf (32.1KB, pdf)
Supplementary Fig. 4

Supplementary Fig. 3. Epistasis experiments to test whether GATA acts through induction of Vg1 (A, B) or BMP4 (C-F). A, B: GATA-MO was electroporated into the anterior half of an embryo (experimental design as in Fig. 4D), and expression of Vg1 examined after 9 hours. An example is shown after in situ hybridisation for Vg1 (A) and the same case after staining with anti-fluorescein to reveal the morpholino-electroporated cells (B). In this case, Vg1 is upregulated in the region where GATA was knocked-down. C-F. GATA-MO (C-D) or Control-MO (E-F) was electroporated anteriorly in an intact embryo and BMP4 expression examined 6 hours later. GATA-MO causes slight downregulation of BMP4 expression (C-D) as compared to the control (E-F).

NIHMS51676-supplement-Supplementary_Fig__4.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)

RESOURCES