Replication and meta-analysis of TMEM132D gene variants in panic disorder

Abstract

A recent genome-wide association study in patients with panic disorder (PD) identified a risk haplotype consisting of two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs7309727 and rs11060369) located in intron 3 of TMEM132D to be associated with PD in three independent samples. Now we report a subsequent confirmation study using five additional PD case–control samples (n=1670 cases and n=2266 controls) assembled as part of the Panic Disorder International Consortium (PanIC) study for a total of 2678 cases and 3262 controls in the analysis. In the new independent samples of European ancestry (EA), the association of rs7309727 and the risk haplotype rs7309727–rs11060369 was, indeed, replicated, with the strongest signal coming from patients with primary PD, that is, patients without major psychiatric comorbidities (n=1038 cases and n=2411 controls). This finding was paralleled by the results of the meta-analysis across all samples, in which the risk haplotype and rs7309727 reached P-levels of P=1.4e−8 and P=1.1e−8, respectively, when restricting the samples to individuals of EA with primary PD. In the Japanese sample no associations with PD could be found. The present results support the initial finding that TMEM132D gene contributes to genetic susceptibility for PD in individuals of EA. Our results also indicate that patient ascertainment and genetic background could be important sources of heterogeneity modifying this association signal in different populations.

Introduction

TMEM132D was first identified as a possible candidate gene for panic disorder (PD) in a genome-wide association study conducted at the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry in Munich. A two single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) haplotype in intron 3 of the gene containing the T allele of rs7309727 and the A allele of rs11060369 was highly associated with PD in three German case–control samples, but did not reach genome-wide significance in the meta-analysis.¹ Furthermore, three independent SNPs located in intron 4 were associated with the severity of anxiety symptoms in patients with a number of different primary psychiatric disorders. Additional evidence for involvement of the TMEM132D gene in anxiety comes from a family-based genome-wide study in patients with ADHD. Here, rs11060369 was highly associated (P=2.3e−5) with symptoms of anxiety and depression in these patients as measured by the relevant subscales of the Child Behavior Checklist.² Finally, recent data from our group also suggest that private non-synonymous coding mutations in TMEM132D are over-represented in patients with PD.³ These findings in humans supporting an involvement of TMEM132D in anxiety are corroborated by data in a mouse model of extremes in trait anxiety that showed a positive correlation of high anxiety-related behavior and expression of Tmem132d mRNA in the anterior cingulate cortex, as well as association of a Tmem132d SNP with anxiety-related behavior.¹ The gene expression results in animals are consistent with the finding that the risk allele is correlated with higher TMEM132D expression in the frontal cortex in human postmortem brain tissue. These data would suggest that higher expression of TMEM132D is associated with increased measures of anxiety.

TMEM132D is a single-pass transmembrane protein, which is highly expressed in the cortical regions of the human and mouse brain. The function of the gene product is still unknown. It has been proposed that the protein may serve as a cell-surface marker for oligodendrocyte differentiation.⁴ Other recent data, however, show that it may be most prominently expressed in neurons and colocalizes with actin filaments,⁵ suggesting that TMEM132D may be implicated in neuronal sprouting and connectivity in brain regions important for anxiety-related behavior.

As evidence from multiple studies and experimental approaches point to the putative relevance of TMEM132D in anxiety phenotypes, we wanted to test whether our initial association results could be replicated in independent cohorts for PD. We thus genotyped the top associated TMEM132D SNPs from Erhardt et al.¹ in five additional PD samples drawn from the Panic Disorder International Consortium (PanIC).⁶ Finally, we performed a meta-analysis including all eight PD samples, three from the initial study and five additionally genotyped samples, for a total of 2678 PD cases and 3262 controls.

Materials and methods

Samples

The four top associated case–control SNPs in the TMEM132D gene reported in the original study were genotyped in five additional PD samples (total number of PD patients n=1670 and controls n=2266) as part of the PanIC study.⁶ The contributing sites were: (1) Aarhus (cases n=102, controls n=511), Copenhagen (cases n=141, controls n=345) and Gothenburg (cases n=217) from Denmark and Sweden (ACG); (2) Tartu and Estonia (cases n=217, controls n=285), (3) Iowa (cases n=38, controls n=40) and Toronto (cases n=127, controls n=123) from USA/Canada (IT); (4) the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), USA (cases n=77, controls n=192); and (5) Japan (cases n=760, controls n=760) (Table 1). Subjects were matched for gender and age and must have had their first panic attack before developing an alcohol abuse disorder and before the age of 35.

Table 1. Demographic data of eight PD samples included in the final meta-analysis.

Sample	Number		Gender		PD diagnosis	Comorbidity
	Cases	Controls	Cases	Controls	Cases	Cases
ACG total	460	856
Aarhus	102	511	Male 25.0%	Male 50.5%	PDA 56%, PD 44%	MDE 22.2%
Copenhagen	141	345	Female 75.0%	Female 49.5%	PPD 77.6%	SA 5.2%
Gothenburg	217	0				NS 47.1%
Tartu	217	285	Male 23.0%	Male 30.0%	PDA 61.5%, PD 38.5%	MDE/BP 62.3%
			Female 77.0%	Female 70.0%	PPD 49.7	SA 15.6%
IT total	165	163
Iowa	38	40	Male 29.7%	Male 26%	PDA 75.6%, PD 24.4%	MDE/BP 39.9%
Toronto	127	123	Female 70.3%	Female 74%	PPD 60.6%
NIMH	77	192	Male 21.0%	Male 21.0%	PDA 38.8%, PD 61.2%	MDE/BP 100%
			Female 79.0%	Female 79.0%	PPD 0%
Japan	760	770	Male 31.8%	Male 52.8%	PDA 57.3%, PD 42.7%	MDE 42.8%, SA 5.2%, OAD 4.0%, OCD 3.3%
			Female 68.2%	Female 47.2%	PPD 35.8%
MPIa	216	222	Male 33.2%	Male 32.9%	PDA 83.3%, PD	—
			Female 66.8%	Female 67.1%	16.7% PPD 100%
PD German multicentera	225	240	Male 40.4%	Male 40.2%	PDA 67.5%, PD	MDE 22.7%
			Female 59.6%	Female 59.8%	32.5% PPD 78.2%	SA 8.9%, NS 25.3%
Bonna	436	452	Male 33.3%	Male 50.9%	PDA 39%, PD 20.4%	MDE/BP 73.4%, OAD 40.6%
			Female 66.7%	Female 49.1%	PPD 10.1%	SchiD 10.6%

Abbreviations: ACG, Aarhus, Copenhagen (Denmark), Gothenburg (Sweden); BP, bipolar disorder; IT, Iowa, Toronto (USA, Canada); MDE, depressive disorder; MPI, Max Planck Institute for Psychiatry, Munich; NIMH, National Institute for Mental Health (USA); NS, not specified; OAD, other anxiety disorders; PDA, panic disorder with agoraphobia; PD, panic disorder without agoraphobia; PD German multicenter, recruited in Münster, Würzburg, Göttingen and Bonn; PPD, primary PD, exclusion of severe and recurrent major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and substance dependence; SA, substance abuse or dependence secondary to the panic disorder (mainly alcoholism); SchiD, schizophrenic disorder.

Patients and controls were matched by age; mean age of all patients 39.1 (s.d. 11.5); mean age controls 39.4 (s.d. 11.9).

^aPD samples previously genotyped in Erhardt et al.

In the final meta-analysis, eight PD samples were included; three German samples are described in Erhardt et al.¹ (MPI (discovery sample): recruited at the Max Planck Institute in Munich; PD German multicenter (Stage 2): recruited at Universities of Münster, Würzburg, Bonn and Göttingen; Bonn (Stage 3): recruited at the University of Bonn). All patients in the eight PD samples had a DSM-IV or ICD-10 (Aarhus, MPI¹) based diagnosis of PD, with or without agoraphobia. Information regarding the recruitment and characterization of cases and controls is detailed in these references.^{7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14} In most samples, PD was the primary diagnosis (ACG, Tartu, Toronto, Japan, MPI¹ and PD German multicenter¹), except for the cases from Iowa, the NIMH and Bonn. Cases and controls from Iowa were recruited from a large longitudinal case and control adoption study of substance use. The samples from Bonn and NIMH were primarily recruited from families with bipolar disorder (Table 1). In the primary PD samples listed above, control individuals were recruited from the general population. The presence of PD and other psychiatric disorders was excluded by administering either a short questionnaire (Japan, ACG) or a structural interview (MPI: SCID, Toronto: Mini-SCID, Tartu: MINI). All studies were approved by the local ethical committees.

Genotyping

The genotyping was performed at the NIMH. For genotyping, pre-designed TaqMan SNP assays were used according to the manufacturer's protocol on the MJ Research Tetrad PTC-225 Thermo Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and intensities were read on an Analyst HT fluorescent plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The genotypes were scored using a clustering algorithm kindly provided by Sam Chen, Virginia Commonwealth University (Richmond, VA, USA).

Statistics

Case–control association analyses were conducted using PLINK (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/∼purcell/plink/) with an additive model for the single-SNP associations and the option hap-logistic for haplotype-based associations. P⩽0.05 were considered as nominally significant. Fixed-effects meta-analysis and forest plots were assessed with the R-library rmeta (http://www.r-project.org/). We first analyzed the newly genotyped five PD samples for single-SNP association and haplotype association (n=1679 cases, n=2266 controls). In the second step, a meta-analysis of these five samples was performed. Finally, a meta-analysis of all eight available PD samples, including the first three samples reported in Erhardt et al. (combined: cases n=2678, controls n=3262), was done, followed by meta-analyses restricted to European ancestry (EA) samples, only excluding the Japanese sample (EA: n=1863 cases, n=2411 controls). As the association of TMEM132D variants in the original publication was highest for PD without major comorbidities, we further stratified the EA samples by primary diagnosis of PD (PPD; cases n=1038, controls n=2411), that is, excluding all patients with comorbid major depression, bipolar disorders, schizophrenia or substance dependence.

Results

Independent replication samples

Single-SNP analysis and haplotype analysis of the five newly genotyped samples are presented in Table 2. Single-SNP associations in the same direction as in the initial three German samples were seen in the ACG sample and partly in the sample from IT for the top two SNPs, rs7309727 and rs11060369, being strongest in the ACG sample (for example, rs7309727, P=0.001). The analysis of the haplotype rs7309727–rs11060369 was nominally significant in the omnibus test in the ACG (P=0.0054) and NIMH (P=0.037) samples. The single-risk haplotype TA reported in the original study could be replicated with nominally significant results only in the ACG sample (P=0.0023). In the meta-analysis of the five new PD samples, nominally significant results could be obtained only for rs4759958 (P=0.036). Nominally significant associations in the same direction as in the first report were observed for rs7309727 for EA populations (P=0.045) and PPD (P=0.003), but not in the combined analysis (P=0.28). The meta-analysis of the haplotype rs7309727–rs11060369 was not nominally significant using the omnibus test. However, the meta-analysis for the risk haplotype TA reached nominal significance (P=0.036) with a trend for the protective haplotype CA (P=0.06), both with congruent directions to the first study.

Table 2. Single-SNP association analysis, haplotype analysis and meta-analysis results of the five newly genotyped samples from the PanIC.

Samples	ACG	Tartu	IT	NIMH	Japan	Combined
Number of cases	460	217	165	77	760	1679
Number of controls	856	285	163	192	770	2266
SNPs
rs7309727
P-value	0.001	0.5	0.7	0.05	0.4	0.41
OR (CI)	1.36 (1.13–1.65)	1.09 (0.82–1.47)	0.95 (0.66–1.36)	0.63 (0.39–1.0)	0.94 (0.81–1.09)	1.04 (0.93–1.16)
rs11060369
P-value	0.9	0.6	0.01	0.6	0.8	0.28
OR (CI)	0.99 (0.83–1.18)	0.92 (0.7–1.21)	0.67 (0.49–0.94)	0.90 (0.61–1.32)	0.98 (0.85–1.14)	0.94 (0.87–1.04)
rs9804847
P-value	0.9	0.3	0.05	0.17	0.2	0.97
OR (CI)	1.0 (0.85–1.18)	1.15 (0.88–1.49)	0.72 (0.52–1.01)	0.77 (0.53–1.11)	1.21 (0.93–1.58)	0.99 (0.89–1.11)
rs4759958
P-value	0.07	0.8	0.1	0.7	0.3	0.036
OR (CI)	1.17 (0.98–1.38)	0.96 (0.73–1.28)	0.28 (0.93–1.75)	1.07 (0.73–1.60	1.07 (0.93–1.24)	1.11 (1.0–1.23)
Haplotype rs7309727–rs11060369
Omnibus test	0.0054	0.81	0.21	0.037	0.33	0.47
CC
P-value	0.69	0.54	0.02	0.51	0.82	0.77
OR (CI)	0.98 (0.82–1.17)	0.92 (0.70–1.21)	0.67 (0.49–0.94)	0.99 (0.82–1.17)	0.98 (0.81–1.1)	0.99 (0.90–1.08)
TA
P-value	0.0023	0.5	0.7	0.057	0.37	0.036
OR (CI)	1.36 (1.12–1.65)	1.1 (0.81–1.49)	0.95 (0.66–0.37)	0.63 (0.4–1.0)	0.93 (0.81–1.08)	1.11 (0.10–1.24)
CA
P-value	0.006	0.9	0.01	0.017	0.16	0.064
OR (CI)	0.79 (0.67–0.93)	1.0 (0.99–1.01)	1.5 (1.1–2.05)	1.6 (1.1–2.39)	1.15 (0.95–1.39)	0.91 (0.84–1.0)

Abbreviations: ACG, Aarhus, Copenhagen, Gothenburg; CI, 95% confidence interval; EA, European ancestry,all samples except the Japanese sample; IT, Iowa, Toronto (USA, Canada); NIMH, National Institute for Mental Health (USA); OR, odds ratio; PanIC, Panic Disorder International Consortium; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

Nominally significant P-values are displayed in bold digits.

Meta-analysis across all samples

The results of the final meta-analysis including eight PD samples for single SNPs and haplotype rs7309727–rs11060369 are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3. Meta-analysis results for eight PD samples (PanIC: n=5; Erhardt et al.: n=3) for the top SNPs and the best associated haplotype rs7309727–rs11060369 in the TMEM132D gene.

Samples	Combined	European ancestry	European ancestry PPD	Japan PPD
Number of cases	2678	1863	1038	760
Number of controls	3262	2411	2411	770
SNPs
rs7309727
P-value	0.0007	3.98e−6	1.05e−8	0.27
OR (CI)	1.16 (1.05–1.26)	1.27 (1.15–1.41)	1.45 (1.20–1.72)	0.90 (0.73–1.09)
p-het	5.97e−6	0.0003	NS
rs11060369
P-value	0.0007	7.64e−5	0.0004	0.78
OR (CI)	0.87 (0.74–0.94)	0.83 (0.75–0.90)	0.81 (0.73–0.89)	0.97 (0.80–1.18)
p-het	0.01	0.034	NS
rs9804847
P-value	0.05	0.1	0.12	0.16
OR (CI)	1.08 (1.0–1.18)	1.07 (0.98–1.17)	1.09 (0.96–1.22)	1.29 (0.90–1.84)
p-het	0.009	0.006	0.005
rs4759958
P-value	0.003	0.006	0.06	0.08
OR (CI)	1.12 (1.1–1.21)	1.14 (1.05–1.26)	1.11 (0.97–1.26)	1.20 (0.98–1.47)
p-het	NS	NS	NS
Haplotype rs7309727–rs11060369
Omnibus test	0.00014	1.12e−6	5.02e−8	0.13
CC
P-value	0.0003	3.8e−5	0.0004	0.73
OR (CI)	0.87 (0.8–0.93)	0.82 (0.75–0.90)	0.80 (0.73–0.89)	0.96 (0.80–1.17)
p-het	0.02	0.022	NS
TA
P-value	0.001	3.35e−6	1.4e−8	0.24
OR (CI)	1.15 (1.06–1.25)	1.28 (1.15–1.41)	1.44 (1.20–1.73)	0.89 (0.74–1.06)
p-het	9.4e−6	0.0002	NS
CA
P-value	0.9	0.9	0.09	0.17
OR (CI)	1.0 (0.99–1.01)	1.0 (0.99–1.01)	0.91 (0.82–1.0)	1.3 (0.92–1.83)
p-het	9.6e−4	0.001	NS

Abbreviations: ACG. Aarhus, Copenhagen, Gothenburg; CI, 95% confidence interval; Combined, all eight PD samples including the initial German samples from Munich, PD German multicenter and Bonn; European ancestry, all samples except the Japanese sample; IT, Iowa, Toronto (USA, Canada); NIMH, National Institute for Mental Health (USA); NS, not significant; OR, odds ratio; p-het, P-value test for heterogeneity; PanIC, Panic Disorder International Consortium; PPD, primary panic disorder, exclusion of cases with severe and recurrent major depression, bipolar disorders, schizophrenia and substance dependence; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

Results for the combined meta-analysis and subsamples. P-values surviving correction for multiple testing genome-wide are displayed in bold.

In the meta-analysis of all EA samples with primary PD, the association with rs7309727 was strongest (P=1.8e−8, OR=1.43) (Figure 1). Associations were less significant when analyzing all EA samples (P=2.5e−6) or all samples together, including the Japanese sample (P=0.0007). When the meta-analysis was further restricted to primary PD samples recruited at European sites (cases n=908, controls n=2056), the significance increased to a P-value of 7.1e−9 (OR 1.48). Similar results were obtained for the risk haplotype TA for rs7309727–rs11060369 (EA PPD P=1.4e−8, OR 1.44; see Figure 2 and Table 3). It is noteworthy that the association of the protective haplotype CC is strengthened in all combined samples, especially in the EA sample, and that this haplotype is associated in the same direction with PD in all eight samples.

Figure 1.

Combined meta-analysis for the SNP rs7309727 in the TMEM132D gene. ACG: Aarhus, Copenhagen, Gothenburg; Tartu (Estonia); European Ancestry: all samples except the Japanese sample; European Ancestry primary PD: exclusion of cases with severe and recurrent major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and substance dependence; IT: Iowa, Toronto (USA, Canada); MPI: Max Planck Institute for Psychiatry, Munich; NIMH: National Institute for Mental Health (USA). *Samples published in Erhardt et al.¹

Figure 2.

Combined meta-analysis of the risk haplotype TA for rs7309727 and rs11060369. ACG: Aarhus, Copenhagen, Gothenburg; Tartu (Estonia); European Ancestry: all samples except the Japanese sample; European Ancestry primary PD: exclusion of cases with severe and recurrent major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and substance dependence; IT: Iowa, Toronto (USA, Canada); MPI: Max Planck Institute for Psychiatry, Munich; NIMH National Institute for Mental Health (USA). *Samples published in Erhardt et al.¹

Discussion

The present results support the association of rs7309727 and the risk haplotype rs7309727–rs11060369 in the TMEM132D gene in EA samples selected for PPD, corroborating the initial finding that TMEM132D gene contributes to the genetic susceptibility for PD.

In fact, the association of rs7309727 and the risk haplotype rs7309727–rs11060369 replicates in the new independent samples of European descent, with the strongest signal coming from patients with primary PD (see Table 2). This was paralleled by the findings from the meta-analysis across all samples in which the association reached a significance level below the threshold for multiple correction for genome-wide association studies in this subgroup of patients (see Table 3). This indicates that the association with the TMEM132D is strongest when increasing the homogeneity of the samples with respect to both genetic background as well as case ascertainment and/or definition strategies.

The association was not replicated in the studied Japanese sample, perhaps due to differences in risk alleles or population structure. Consistent with this idea, the tests of heterogeneity were significant in the combined sample, whereas they were not significant for the meta-analysis of the EA and European PPD samples. The differences in genetic background between the Asian and the European samples may contribute to this heterogeneity, as the functional variant underlying the association signal in intron 3 has not yet been identified. Further finemapping of the locus in both samples will be necessary to address this issue. Promising preliminary findings come from a GWAS for PD in a Japanese population, in which two SNPs in the TMEM132D gene located in the same intron as the top SNPs in the present study showed nominal association with PD.¹⁵ This may suggest that a common but yet unidentified functional variant underlies the signals found in the EA and Japanese populations. It is increasingly recognized that significant differences in associations obtained from GWAS in different ancestry groups are not uncommon.¹⁶

An interesting aspect of this study is that TMEM132D variants showed the strongest associations when restricting the European descent samples to patients with primary PD. While this is in line with our previous report, in which these variants were associated with PD but not with the dimensional measure of anxiety, it is at odds with a recent report that rs11060369 is associated with dimensional measures of anxiety in patients with ADHD.² In a recent pooled genome-wide association study in German individuals with personality disorders, one SNP in TMEM132D located in the intron 4 was nominally associated with Cluster B and C Personality Disorders (Weißflog et al., in revision). We had previously reported associations with dimensional measures of anxiety with a set of linked variants in intron 4 of TMEM132D that are not in linkage disequilibrium with the disease-associated variants in intron 3. In fact, these associations with dimensional anxiety measures were seen in patients with anxiety disorders, major depression as well as healthy individuals.¹ Additional studies investigating different or common loci in TMEM132D associated with PD specifically or dimensional anxiety measures will be necessary.

This study presents genetic association data in the largest collection of patients with PD published to date (cases n=2678, controls n=3262), within the PanIC consortium. While we observe interesting supportive data for the association of TMEM132D with primary PD in individuals of European ancestry, additional studies in larger samples with an increased marker density are needed to identify the possible sources of heterogeneity of the observed association, and seek further replication and extensions of our findings in samples of different ethnic backgrounds, and to identify the putative functional variants.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.