Abstract
Analysis of the crystal structure of NifF from Rhodobacter capsulatus and its homologues reported so far reflects the existence of unique structural features in nif flavodoxins: a leucine at the re face of the isoalloxazine, an eight-residue insertion at the C-terminus of the 50’s loop and a remarkable difference in the electrostatic potential surface with respect to non-nif flavodoxins. A phylogenetic study on 64 sequences from 52 bacterial species revealed four clusters, including different functional prototypes, correlating the previously defined as “short-chain” with the firmicutes flavodoxins and the “long-chain” with gram-negative species. The comparison of Rhodobacter NifF structure with other bacterial flavodoxin prototypes discloses the concurrence of specific features of these functional electron donors to nitrogenase.
Keywords: flavodoxin, nitrogen fixation, crystal structure, phylogenetic analysis
1. Introduction
Flavodoxins (Flds) are small flavoproteins of 140–180 amino acids that function as electron carriers in a plethora of redox pathways. They carry a non-covalently bound FMN (flavin mononucleotide) molecule as a prosthetic group, which is able to alternate between three redox states: a completely oxidized state (quinone, Q), a one-electron reduced state (semiquinone, SQ·) and a two-electron reduced state (hydroquinone, HQ). The redox-potential of FMN in Flds is modulated towards the stabilization of the SQ· at the expense of the HQ by the protein surrounding the flavin. This tuning of the equilibrium between FMN redox forms allows Flds to generally behave as mono-electron carriers alternating between SQ· and HQ [1,2]. Flds have been classified in two groups, the “long-chain” and the “short-chain” subfamilies, depending on the presence of a defined 20-residues loop, which would be related mostly to the interaction of Fld with its partner proteins, rather than accomplishing a structural role [3].
Flds are widely distributed among bacteria and a few algae species [3,4], and different metabolic roles have been described for this flavoprotein in each biological system studied. In diazotrophs, conversion of atmospheric dinitrogen to ammonia is an essential biological process carried out by the nitrogenase protein complex, which is required to be reduced by a low-potential electron carrier, either a ferredoxin (Fd) or a Fld [5]. Rhodobacter capsulatus is a non-sulphur purple bacterium capable of fixating atmospheric nitrogen when ammonium levels in the medium are limiting. This microorganism possesses a nitrogen-fixation (nif)-dependent flavodoxin (Rc-NifF) of 181 amino acids [6], which is included within the long chain subfamily of Flds. Rc-NifF has been proposed to function as an electron carrier to the nitrogenase in vivo on the basis of the following observations: (1) Rc-NifF is able to efficiently reduce the nitrogenase in vitro with a KM of 1.5 μM [7]; (2) its expression depends of the nitrogen-fixation growing culture conditions [7]; (3) it displays a high sequence homology degree with other NifF proteins identified in diazotrophs, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Azotobacter chroococcum or Azotobacter vinelandii, where its function has been experimentally proven [8–11]; and (4) it forms a stable complex with the nitrogenase in vitro with a Kd value of 0.44 μM [5]. Moreover, redox potential values of Rc-NifF are in the same range as those reported for the iron-sulphur protein component of nitrogenase [2]. In R. capsulatus, nitrogenase reduction by NifF has been proposed to be supported by ferredoxin(flavodoxin)-NADP(H) reductase (FPR, EC 1.18.1.2) [12]. FPR displays turnover values compatible with those of the nitrogenase and would act by transferring electrons from the cellular NADPH pool to the nitrogenase via Rc-NifF [2].
In this work, we describe the crystallographic structure of the NifF flavodoxin from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus and compare it with structural homologues reported so far. Moreover, an extensive phylogenetic analysis of flavodoxin sequences is also presented. All together, our results reveal unique structural features present in the group of nif flavodoxins.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. General Structure of Rc-NifF and FMN Environment
Overall, folding of Rc-NifF is conserved with respect to other flavodoxins, consisting of a central parallel five-stranded beta sheet (β1–β5B) flanked by five alpha helices (α1–α5) (Figure 1A). Rc-NifF displays the highest structural homology with the long-chain flavodoxin from A. vinelandii [13] with an Rmsd value of 0.55 Å (see Figure 1) Both present an insertion of eight amino acids at the C-terminal of the 50’s loop (NifF insertion) following the β3 strand (residues 65–72), previously observed in other nif flavodoxins (Figure 1).
FMN occupies a cavity located at the C-terminal region of the central β-sheet with the isoalloxazine ring stacked between two hydrophobic residues, the Leu58 (β3–α3 loop) and the Tyr103 (β4–α4 loop) (Figure 1A). Residues sandwiching the isoalloxazine ring mask the prosthetic group from the solvent, creating a negatively charged environment around the FMN that destabilizes the HQ form. Tyr103 is conserved in Flds, and it stabilizes the si face of the isoalloxazine ring by π–π stacking interactions. However, while long-chain flavodoxins present a Trp at the re face of the isoalloxazine, nif Flds carries a Leu residue (Leu58 in R. capsulatus) (Figures 1B and 2A). This position has been reported to be involved in the regulation of the redox potential of the cofactor by creating a hydrophobic environment that destabilizes the HQ and favors the SQ· form [14]. The presence of this Leu at the re face makes the isoalloxazine more accessible to the solvent compared to non-nif Flds containing a Trp in this position, which should provide a major stabilization of the HQ. Another factor proposed to play an important role in tuning FMN redox state is the conformation of 50’ loop [3]. During FMN reduction from Q state to both SQ· and HQ states, N(5) atom of the isoalloxazine becomes protonated, and a peptide bond in the 50’ loop (Gly59-Asp60 in Rc-NifF) flips from an O-down conformation to an O-up conformation. Rc-NifF was crystallized in the oxydized state, but, unexpectedly, the 50’ loop was found adopting a trans O-up conformation, which should favor FMN reduction in Rc-NifF.
2.2. Distribution of Charged Residues
Analysis of the electrostatic potential surface of Rc-NifF reveals a total of 27 acidic residues and 14 basic residues, giving a net charge of −13. Ten over the twenty-seven acidic residues situate within a radius of 20 Å from the isoalloxazine, creating an electronegative environment around the redox cofactor. These residues are: Asp11 (β1–α1 loop), Glu73 and Glu77 (N-terminal of the α3 helix), Glu37 and Asp60 (β3–α3 loop), Asp99 and Glu106 (β4–α4 loop), Glu137 and Asp138 (β5A–β5B loop) and Asp155 (β5B–α5 loop). Five Asp/Glu amino acids (Asp11, Asp60, Asp99, Glu106 and Asp155) are in the vicinity of the isoalloxazine ring at distances shorter than 7 Å to the redox center, so their carboxyl groups would be directly involved in the tuning of the redox potential of Rc-NifF (Figure 2).
Rc-NifF presents a basic patch adjacent to the FMN-binding site formed by Arg16, Lys17 and Lys20 (α1 helix), Lys33 (α1–β2 loop) and Arg39 (β2–α2 loop). These residues introduce large differences in the charge distribution on the surface of the protein, which change the orientation of the dipole moment with respect to other Fld structures reported so far (Figure 2, panels B–D). This basic patch is also present in nif flavodoxin of A. vinelandii (PDB entry code 1YOB), where five of these six basic residues are conserved [13]. Dipole-moment orientation is also very similar in both R. capsulatus and A. vinelandii Flds. In addition, this particular dipole-moment orientation and conservation of this basic patch have been predicted for A. chroococum and K. pneumoniae Flds [15,16].
The eight-residue insertion present in Rc-NifF comprises five backbone carbonyl groups (Leu66, Leu67, Ans69, Ala70 and Ala71) and one side-chain carbonyl group (Asn69) protruding to the solvent. Interestingly, orientation of all these backbone carbonyls is structurally conserved in A. vinelandii flavodoxin [13]. Also comprised in the 50’ loop insertion of nif flavodoxins, residues 68 and 72 have been shown to be directly involved in the interaction with nitrogenase in A. chroococcum by NMR experiments [16]. All together, these observations support that nif Flds share a peculiar electrostatic potential surface that, as proposed, could play a role in the interaction of these Flds with other nif proteins [15,16].
2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis
A phylogenetic analysis carried out with 64 flavodoxin sequences from 52 bacterial species allowed the construction of an unrooted tree using the Neighbor-Joining method (Figure 3). The displayed clustering corresponds to four well-defined groups of microorganisms (firmicutes, α-proteobacteria, γ-proteobacteria and cyanobacteria), the most containing Flds with assigned biological function. Sequences split into two large groups with good statistical support: short chain Flds, corresponding to gram-positive bacteria (firmicutes) and long chain Flds comprising gram-negative organisms (proteobacteria and cyanobacteria) where Rc-NifF is included.
The short-chain sub-family (Firmicutes phylum) includes Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus and Streptococcus pneumoniae, among others. A biological role was reported only in the case of B. subtilis Flds YkuN and YkuP, both capable of supporting biotin synthesis as electron donors to Cyt P450 BioI and biotin synthase [17]. A similar Cyt P450 reductase activity was reported for Clostridium Fld [18], although it came out as a single isolated branch in the phylogenetic tree, suggesting a previous deviation from the ancestor of the Bacillus Flds (Figure 3). A similar divergence is observed by the Megasphaera elsdenii sequence, a flavoprotein commonly used as structural model for studies of its redox activity and modulation [19]. No Fld from Actinobacteria phylum came out during this sequence collection after applying the BLAST protocol with the Rhodobacter NifF as query.
Flavodoxins from Gamma proteobacteria include the two archetypical proteins from enterobacteria. The FldA and FldB from Escherichia coli are both members of the SoxRS regulon, an adaptive system responsive to oxidative damage modulated by redox-cycling agents [20]. Several biochemical and molecular results pointed towards the involvement of FldA in the antioxidant response of E. coli [21]. Previous in vitro studies revealed that FldA is also necessary for providing “low potential” electrons to the reductive activation of enzymes, such as pyruvate-formate lyase and the anaerobic ribonucleotide reductase [22,23]. Although FldB is also a SoxRS responsive protein, its putative role during oxidative stress is still controversial, as a high copy number plasmid carrying fldB gene did not complement the fldA mutation [24]. In this frame, various structural differences cause FldA and FldB to cluster in different groups (Figure 3).
The sequence of Rhodobacter NifF fits into a cluster containing all other nif responsive Flds, within the group of alpha-proteobacteria. Nif flavodoxins have been involved in the reduction of nitrogenase in diazotrophs like A. chroococcum [25], A. vinelandii [26] and K. pneumoniae [27]. The presence of an eight amino acid insertion in the 50’ loop (NifF insertion), probably involved in the interaction with nitrogenase [16], is a typical structural feature of this group, as well as the conservation of a Leu at the re face of the isoalloxazine that substitutes the Trp highly conserved in other long chain Flds (Figures 1 and 2). This Leu residue increases the exposition of the isoalloxazine to the solvent in both R. capsulatus and A. vinelandii Flds, which should therefore provide a major stabilization of the HQ in nif Flds.
The distribution of the surface charged residues found in nif Flds remarkably differs from that observed in cyanobacterial Flds (Figure 2). Sequence comparison analysis shows the presence of numerous basic residues all along the region from α1 to α2 helices (residues 14–41) in nif Flds. Most of the analyzed sequences display few basic residues located down-stream the α1 helix, and only nif Flds present such a high concentration of conserved positive charges in the α1 helix, as marked in Figure 2B (R16, K17, K20, K33 and R39). Structural analysis of R. capsulatus and A. vinelandii Flds shows that these basic residues located in α1 helix generate large deviations of dipole-moment orientation with respect to other Flds (Figure 2B,C). This deviation would be distinctively conserved in nif Flds, supporting its biological relevance. In this regard, evidence reported so far support that this biological meaning is related with the interaction of nif Flds with other nif proteins. In the case of Rc-NifF, those proteins would be the nitrogenase and its proposed natural electron donor, the flavodoxin:NADP(H) reductase [12].
Finally, all eleven cyanobacterial ones are clustered in a definite out-group (see Figure 3). Under iron deficit and consequent ferredoxin scarcity, Fld is synthesized and replaces the Fe–S protein acting as an electron carrier between photosystem I and the ferredoxin-NADP(H) reductase in vegetative cells [28,29]. A possible role of Fld as electron donor to nitrogenase in cyanobacteria is still a matter of debate. While in vitro experiments showed a discrete ability of Anabaena Fld to reduce nitrogenase [30], no stimulation of diazotrophic growth under iron limiting conditions was observed in a heterocyst ferredoxin mutant [31]. The sequence and crystal structure comparison detailed above, together with the differently oriented dipolar moment vectors (Figure 2) and the phylogenetic relationships (Figure 3), depict molecular features that exclude Anabaena Fld from the group of nif flavodoxins.
3. Experimental Section
3.1. Protein Expression and Purification
nifF-coding sequence from R. capsulatus [6] was cloned into pET-32a vector (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA) and expressed as a His6-Trx tag recombinant protein in E. coli [12]. The tagged protein was purified after Ni-NTA affinity chromatography (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and subsequent enterokinase treatment of the fusion protein to render free Rc-NifF, as previously described [12].
3.2. Crystallization and Data Collection
Rc-NifF was crystallized using the hanging drop vapor diffusion method at 293 K, as described before [32]. An X-ray data set was collected up to 2.17 Å resolution using the CuKα radiation (λ of 1.5418).
3.3. Structural Determination and Refinement
Rc-NifF structure was solved at 2.17 Å resolution by the Molecular Replacement Method using the program MOLREP [33] and coordinates of Anabaena PCC7120 flavodoxin (PDB entry 1FLV). A model consisting of a single molecule in the asymmetric unit was subjected to alternated cycles of refinement with programs CNS [34] and REFMAC [35] and manual model building with the software package O [36]. The geometry of the final model was checked using the program PROCHECK [37], finding all residues to be included in permitted regions of the Ramachandran Plot. An electron density map allowed the determination of the complete polypeptide chain of the flavodoxin (182 residues), one FMN molecule bound to the protein and 76 water molecules (statistics of model refinement data are summarized in Table 1). Coordinates were deposited in t he Protein Data Bank with entry code 2WC1.
Table 1.
Data collection statistics | |
---|---|
Space group, unit cell (Å, °) | P41212, a = b = 66.49 c = 121.32 α = β = γ = 90 |
Temperature (K) | 100 |
Wavelength (Å) | 1.5418 |
No. of molecules/a.u. | 1 |
Resolution (Å) | 25.65–(2.35–2.17) |
No. observations | 563236 |
No. unique observations | 24830 |
Redundancy | 22.4 (22.9) |
Completeness (%) | 99.9 (100) |
I/σ (I) | 26.0 (8.2) |
Rsymb | 0.07 (0.49) |
Refinement statistics | |
Resolution range (Å) | 25.65–2.17 |
Rwork | 0.25 |
Rfreec | 0.27 |
No. of non-hydrogen atoms | |
Protein | 1402 |
Ligand | 31 |
Solvent | 76 |
RMS deviations from ideal | |
Rmsd bond length (Å) | 0.006 |
Rmsd bond angles (°) | 1.4 |
Ramachandran Plot | |
Most favored (%) | 89.6 |
Additionally allowed (%) | 9.7 |
Generously allowed (%) | 0.6 |
Average B-factor (Å2) | 43.5 |
Values in parentheses correspond to the highest resolution shell;
Rsym = ∑|I − Iav|/∑I, where the summation is over symmetry–equivalent reflections;
R calculated for 7% of data excluded from the refinement.
3.4. Phylogenetic Relationships
The amino acid sequences of 64 Flds from 52 bacteria species analyzed in this work were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information by the BLAST network service. The Flds from Rhodobacter capsulatus, Anabaena, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis were used as the query. To construct the phylogenetic trees, the sequences were aligned in the CLUSTAL X 2.0.9, the windows interface for the Clustal W multiple sequence alignment program [38]. Analyses were performed by the Neighbor-Joining distance method [39] and TreeView X Version 0.5.0 was used to display phylogenies. Confidence limits to the inferences obtained were placed by the bootstrap procedure.
4. Conclusions
The crystal structure of the NifF flavodoxin from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus displays typical structural motifs shared by other nif Flds: a leucine at the re face of the isoalloxazine, an eight-residue insertion at the C-terminus of the 50’s loop and a remarkable difference in the electrostatic potential surface with respect to non-nif flavodoxins. These elements provide specific features among the flavodoxin family that would allow interaction with their native redox partners during nitrogen fixation. The phylogenetic relationships based on bacterial flavodoxin sequences show a reliable clustering of long chain molecules present in firmicutes and the short chain prototypes found in cyanobacteria, alpha proteobacteria or gamma proteobacteria.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge Adrian Arakaki (1967–2009) for inspiring ideas. AB was a fellow of CONICET (Argentina) and NC is a staff investigator of the same institution. This work was supported by grants from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (BFU2011-25326), from Madrid Regional Government (S2010/BMD-2457) and by the grant ANPCyT (PICT 1707-BID) from CONICET (Argentina).
References
- 1.Mayhew S.G., Tollin G. General Properties of Flavodoxins. In: Müller F., editor. Chemistry and Biochemistry of Flavoenzymes. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 1993. pp. 389–426. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nogues I., Perez-Dorado I., Frago S., Bittel C., Mayhew S.G., Gomez-Moreno C., Hermoso J.A., Medina M., Cortez N., Carrillo N. The ferredoxin-NADP(H) reductase from Rhodobacter capsulatus: Molecular structure and catalytic mechanism. Biochemistry. 2005;44:11730–11740. doi: 10.1021/bi0508183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sancho J. Flavodoxins: Sequence, folding, binding, function and beyond. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2006;63:855–864. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5514-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lodeyro A.F., Ceccoli R.D., Pierella-Karlusich J.J., Carrillo N. The importance of flavodoxin for environmental stress tolerance in photosynthetic microorganisms and transgenic plants. Mechanism, evolution and biotechnological potential. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:2917–2924. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.07.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hallenbeck P.C., Gennaro G. Stopped-flow kinetic studies of low potential electron carriers of the photosynthetic bacterium, Rhodobacter capsulatus: Ferredoxin I and NifF. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998;1365:435–442. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(98)00096-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gennaro G., Hubner P., Sandmeier U., Yakunin A.F., Hallenbeck P.C. Cloning, characterization, and regulation of nifF from Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Bacteriol. 1996;178:3949–3952. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.13.3949-3952.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yakunin A.F., Gennaro G., Hallenbeck P.C. Purification and properties of a nif-specific flavodoxin from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus. J. Bacteriol. 1993;175:6775–6780. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.21.6775-6780.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hill S., Kavanagh E.P. Roles of nifF and nifJ gene products in electron transport to nitrogenase in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Bacteriol. 1980;141:470–475. doi: 10.1128/jb.141.2.470-475.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nieva-Gomez D., Roberts G.P., Klevickis S., Brill W.J. Electron transport to nitrogenase in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1980;77:2555–2558. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.5.2555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Klugkist J., Voorberg J.J., Haaker H., Veeger C. Characterization of three different flavodoxins from Azotobacter vinelandii. Eur. J. Biochem. 1986;155:33–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lowery T.J., Wilson P.E., Zhang B., Bunker J., Harrison R.G., Nyborg A.C., Thiriot D., Wat G.D. Flavodoxin hydroquinone reduces Azotobacter vinelandii Fe protein to the all-ferrous redox state with a S = 0 spin state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:17131–17136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603223103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bittel C., Tabares L.C., Armesto M., Carrillo N., Cortez N. The oxidant-responsive diaphorase of Rhodobacter capsulatus is a ferredoxin (flavodoxin)-NADP(H) reductase. FEBS Lett. 2003;553:408–412. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)01075-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alagaratnam S., van Pouderoyen G., Pijning T., Dijkstra B.W., Cavazzini D., Rossi G.L., van Dongen W.M., van Mierlo C.P., van Berkel W.J., Canters G.W. A crystallographic study of Cys69Ala flavodoxin II from Azotobacter vinelandii: Structural determinants of redox potential. Protein Sci. 2005;14:2284–2295. doi: 10.1110/ps.051582605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lostao A., Gómez-Moreno C., Mayhew S.G., Sancho J. Differential stabilization of the three FMN redox forms by tyrosine 94 and tryptophan 57 in flavodoxin from Anabaena and its influence on the redox potentials. Biochemistry. 1997;36:14334–14344. doi: 10.1021/bi971384h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Drummond M.H. Structure predictions and surface charge of nitrogenase flavodoxins from Klebsiella pneumoniae and Azotobacter vinelandii. Eur. J. Biochem. 1986;159:549–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09921.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Peelen S., Wijmenga S., Erbel P.J., Robson R.L., Eady R.R., Vervoort J. Possible role of a short extra loop of the long-chain flavodoxin from Azotobacter chroococcum in electron transfer to nitrogenase: Complete 1H, 15N and 13C backbone assignments and secondary solution structure of the flavodoxin. J. Biomol. NMR. 1996;7:315–330. doi: 10.1007/BF00200433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lawson R.J., von Wachenfeldt C., Haq I., Perkins J., Munro A.W. Expression and characterization of the two flavodoxin proteins of Bacillus subtilis, YkuN and YkuP: Biophysical properties and interactions with cytochrome P450. Biol. Biochem. 2004;43:12390–12409. doi: 10.1021/bi049131t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Malca S.H., Girhard M., Schuster S., Durre P., Urlacher V.B. Expression, purification and characterization of two Clostridium acetobutylicum flavodoxins: Potential electron transfer partners for CYP152A2. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;1814:257–264. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Geoghegan S.M., Mayhew S.G., Yalloway G.N., Butler G. Cloning, sequencing and expression of the gene for flavodoxin from Megasphaera elsdenii and the effects of removing the protein negative charge that is closest to N(1) of the bound FMN. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000;267:4434–4444. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01490.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gu M., Imlay J.A. The SoxRS response of Escherichia coli is directly activated by redox-cycling drugs rather than by superoxide. Mol. Microbiol. 2011;79:1136–1150. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07520.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Giro M., Carrillo N., Krapp A.R. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and ferredoxin-NADP(H) reductase contribute to damage repair during the soxRS response of Escherichia coli. Microbiology. 2006;152:1119–1128. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28612-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Knappe J., Blaschkowski H.P., Grobner P., Schmitt T. Pyruvate formate-lyase of Escherichia coli: The acetyl-enzyme intermediate. Eur. J. Biochem. 1974;50:253–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03894.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bianchi V., Eliasson R., Fontecave M., Mulliez E., Hoover D.M., Matthews R.G., Reichard P. Flavodoxin is required for the activation of the anaerobic ribonucleotide reductase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993;197:792–797. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.2548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gaudu P., Weiss B. Flavodoxin mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 2000;182:1788–1793. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.7.1788-1793.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bagby S., Barker P.D., Hill H.A., Sanghera G.S., Dunbar B., Ashby G.A., Eady R.R., Thorneley R.N. Direct electrochemistry of two genetically distinct flavodoxins isolated from Azotobacter chroococcum grown under nitrogen-fixing conditions. Biochem. J. 1991;277:313–319. doi: 10.1042/bj2770313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bennett L.T., Jacobson M.R., Dean D.R. Isolation, sequencing, and mutagenesis of the nifF gene encoding flavodoxin from Azotobacter vinelandii. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:1364–1369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Deistung J., Cannon F.C., Cannon M.C., Hill S., Thorneley R.N. Electron transfer to nitrogenase in Klebsiella pneumoniae. nifF gene cloned and the gene product, a flavodoxin, purified. Biochem. J. 1985;231:743–753. doi: 10.1042/bj2310743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Medina M. Structural and mechanistic aspects of flavoproteins: Photosynthetic electron transfer from photosystem I to NADP+ FEBS J. 2009;276:3942–3958. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07122.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Setif P. Ferredoxin and flavodoxin reduction by photosystem I. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2001;1507:161–179. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(01)00205-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Razquin P., Schmitz S., Peleato M.L., Fillat M.F., Gómez-Moreno C., Böhme H. Differential activities of heterocyst ferredoxin, vegetative cell ferredoxin, and flavodoxin as electron carriers in nitrogen fixation and photosynthesis in Anabaena sp. Photosynthesis Res. 1995;43:35–40. doi: 10.1007/BF00029460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Masepohl B., Scholisch K., Gorlitz K., Kutzki C., Bohme H. The heterocyst-specific fdxH gene product of the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 is important but not essential for nitrogen fixation. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1997;253:770–776. doi: 10.1007/s004380050383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Perez-Dorado I., Bortolotti A., Cortez N., Hermoso J.A. Crystallization of a flavodoxin involved in nitrogen fixation in Rhodobacter capsulatus. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F. 2008;64:375–377. doi: 10.1107/S1744309108008038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Vagin A., Teplyakov A. Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr. D. 2010;66:22–25. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909042589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Brunger A.T., Adams P.D., Rice L.M. Recent developments for the efficient crystallographic refinement of macromolecular structures. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1998;8:606–611. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(98)80152-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Murshudov G.N., Vagin A.A., Dodson E.J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D. 1997;53:240–255. doi: 10.1107/S0907444996012255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jones T..A., Zou J.Y., Cowan S.W., Kjeldgaard M. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A. 1991;47:110–119. doi: 10.1107/s0108767390010224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Laskowski R.A., MacArthur M.W., Moss D.S., Thornton J.M. PROCHECK: A program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 1993;26:283–291. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Larkin M.A., Blackshields M.A.G., Brown N.P., Chenna R., McGettigan P.A., McWilliam H., Valentin F., Wallace I.M., Wilm A., Lopez R., et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–2948. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987;4:406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]