Skip to main content
Biology Letters logoLink to Biology Letters
. 2013 Feb 23;9(1):20120932. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0932

Forest refugia in Western and Central Africa as ‘museums’ of Mesozoic biodiversity

Jérôme Murienne 1,2, Ligia R Benavides 3, Lorenzo Prendini 4, Gustavo Hormiga 3, Gonzalo Giribet 1,
PMCID: PMC3565512  PMID: 23193047

Abstract

The refugial speciation model, or ‘species pump’, is widely accepted in the context of tropical biogeography and has been advocated as an explanation for present species distributions in tropical Western and Central Africa. In order to test this hypothesis, a phylogeny of the cryptic arachnid order Ricinulei, based on four nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers, was inferred. This ancient clade of litter-dwelling arthropods, endemic to the primary forests of Western and Central Africa and the Neotropics, might provide insights into the mode and tempo of evolution in Africa. Twenty-six African ricinuleid specimens were sampled from eight countries spanning the distribution of Ricinulei on the continent, and analysed together with Neotropical samples plus other arachnid outgroups. The phylogenetic and molecular dating results suggest that Ricinulei diversified in association with the fragmentation of Gondwana. The early diversification of Ricinoides in Western and Central Africa around 88 (±33) Ma fits old palaeogeographical events better than recent climatic fluctuations. Unlike most recent molecular studies, these results agree with fossil evidence, suggesting that refugia may have acted as ‘museums’ conserving ancient diversity rather than as engines generating diversity during successive episodes of climatic fluctuation in Africa.

Keywords: Africa, refugia, marine incursion, Arachnida, Ricinulei, biogeography

1. Introduction

The existence of forest refugia is broadly accepted in tropical biogeography, because there is ample evidence for forest fragmentation linked to past climatic change in temperate and tropical regions [1,2]. Two different hypotheses have been advanced regarding the role of refugia in shaping the current biodiversity of tropical Africa. The refugial speciation model [3], or ‘species pump’, invokes genetic differentiation between allopatric populations, fragmented and trapped in refugia by the expansion of savannah during Quaternary glacial maxima [4]. This hypothesis predicts the origin of most rainforest species to be relatively recent [5]. On the other hand, past climatic changes could have depleted rather than augmented biodiversity, suggesting that refugia might have acted as ‘museums’ for ancient lineages, and divergence between sister species might predate climatic fluctuations [6]. Whereas fossil evidence for plants has long suggested an ancient diversity followed by cycles of extinction owing to climatic fluctuation [7], most molecular studies (see the electronic supplementary material, figure S1) portray climatic fluctuation as an agent of speciation and diversification.

Because of their great age [8], extreme endemism [9,10] and low vagility, Ricinulei Thorell, 1876 represent an excellent model for studying the biogeography of Western and Central Africa. Commonly known as ‘hooded tick spiders’ or ‘tick beetles’, these small (less than 11 mm) predatory arthropods are among the most obscure and cryptic of the arachnid orders [11]. A mere 72 extant ricinuleid species are currently described [12], and grouped in three genera: Ricinoides Ewing, 1929 from tropical Western and Central Africa, and the Neotropical Cryptocellus Westwood, 1874 and Pseudocellus Platnick, 1980. African ricinuleids are restricted to the moist soil and litter habitats of rainforests [13], whereas Neotropical ricinuleids have also been collected in caves [12].

The first molecular phylogeny of Ricinulei is presented here, with the aims of providing a temporal framework for the diversification of Ricinoides in Western and Central Africa, and investigating the effects of forest refugia on the generation and maintenance of tropical biodiversity.

2. Material and methods

Eleven Ricinoides species, recorded from 14 countries (including first record of Ricinulei from Senegal, reported here), are currently recognized in Africa [13,14]. Specimens were collected by sifting leaf litter, Winkler extraction and actively searching in appropriate habitats (especially under logs in forested areas) throughout their known distributional range. Voucher specimens used for DNA isolation have been deposited in the following institutions: American Museum of Natural History (AMNH), New York, NY, USA; Musée Royal de l'Afrique Central (MRAC), Tervuren, Belgium; Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ), Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA (table 1). The ingroup taxon sample comprises 26 specimens, representing at least seven ricinuleid species, from eight African countries (figure 1). Ten Neotropical ricinuleids and 20 representatives of seven other chelicerate orders were included as outgroup taxa (table 1).

Table 1.

Tissue sample numbers, provenance data, GenBank accession numbers and voucher repositories for Ricinulei and outgroup taxa from which DNA sequence data were generated for the present study. COI, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I.

MCZ voucher repository latitude longitude ID country 18S rRNA 28S rRNA 12S rRNA COI
DNA102704 MCZ −3.68333 −70.25000 Cryptocellus peckorum Platnick and Shadab, 1977 Colombia JX951342 JX951355
DNA102711 MCZ −4.12000 −69.92222 C. peckorum Platnick and Shadab, 1977 Colombia JX951320 JX951357 JX951380
DNA102712 MCZ −4.04472 −69.98972 C. peckorum Platnick and Shadab, 1977 Colombia JX951321 JX951358 JX951381
DNA102713 MCZ −4.12028 −69.97528 C. peckorum Platnick and Shadab, 1977 Colombia JX951322 JX951359 JX951382 JX951406
DNA102701 MCZ 9.67167 −83.02500 Cryptocellus sp. Costa Rica JX951317 JX951354 JX951377 JX951404
DNA102710 MCZ −4.37889 −69.99028 Cryptocellus sp. Colombia JX951319 JX951356 JX951379
DNA103735 MCZ-IZ-80067 8.40667 −83.32833 Cryptocellus sp. Costa Rica JX951327 JX951364 JX951387 JX951410
DNA103733 MCZ 15.11440 −89.68047 Pseudocellus sp. Guatemala JX951325 JX951362 JX951385
DNA103734 MCZ 15.58333 −86.66833 Pseudocellus sp. Honduras JX951326 JX951363 JX951386 JX951409
DNA103736 MCZ-IZ-79799 15.71566 −92.93817 Pseudocellus sp. Mexico JX951328 JX951365 JX951388 JX951411
DNA102708 AMNH 6.25039 1.04039 Ricinoides atewa Naskrecki, 2008 Ghana JX951318 JX951378 JX951405
DNA105884 MRAC 225977 7.66667 −8.43333 Ricinoides cf. afzelii Guinea JX951338–9
DNA104741 MCZ 3.64538 11.29033 Ricinoides cf. olounoua Cameroon JX951329 JX951389 JX951412
DNA104742 MCZ 3.64447 11.29107 Ricinoides cf. olounoua Cameroon JX951330 JX951390 JX951413
DNA104744 MCZ 3.66153 11.30262 Ricinoides cf. olounoua Cameroon JX951332 JX951367 JX951391 JX951415
DNA104745 MCZ 3.66195 11.30025 Ricinoides cf. olounoua Cameroon JX951333 JX951392 JX951416
DNA105538 MCZ 3.64513 11.29078 Ricinoides cf. olounoua Cameroon JX951336 JX951395 JX951419
DNA102691 AMNH LP4658 12.08156 −14.80103 Ricinoides feae (Hansen, 1921) Guinea-Bissau JX951312 JX951349 JX951373 JX951399
DNA102692 AMNH LP4660 12.08156 −14.80103 R. feae (Hansen, 1921) Guinea-Bissau JX951313 JX951350 JX951374 JX951400
DNA102693 AMNH LP4661 12.08156 −14.80103 R. feae (Hansen, 1921) Guinea-Bissau JX951314 JX951351 JX951375 JX951401
DNA102694 AMNH LP4662 11.88442 −14.83569 R. feae (Hansen, 1921) Guinea-Bissau JX951315 JX951352 JX951402
DNA102695 AMNH LP4664 12.00250 −14.89053 R. feae (Hansen, 1921) Guinea-Bissau JX951316 JX951353 JX951376 JX951403
DNA102716 AMNH LP4663 11.88442 −14.83569 R. feae (Hansen, 1921) Guinea-Bissau JX951323 JX951360 JX951383 JX951407
DNA102720 AMNH LP4659 12.55294 −12.22761 Ricinoides aff. feae Senegal JX951324 JX951361 JX951384 JX951408
DNA104746 MCZ 2.74108 9.88180 Ricinoides karschii (Hansen & Sørensen, 1904) Cameroon JX951334 JX951393 JX951417
DNA102686 MCZ 1.25278 11.05278 Ricinoides cf. karschii Equatorial Guinea JX951306 JX951344 JX951370 JX951397
DNA102687 MCZ 1.25278 11.05278 Ricinoides cf. karschii Equatorial Guinea JX951307 JX951345 JX951371 JX951398
DNA104743 MCZ 0.50639 12.79422 Ricinoides cf. karschii Gabon JX951331 JX951366 JX951414
DNA104747 MCZ 0.50448 12.79525 Ricinoides cf. karschii Gabon JX951335 JX951368 JX951394 JX951418
DNA105881 MRAC 230596 5.86000 −7.45000 Ricinoides megahanseni Legg, 1982 Ivory Coast JX951337
DNA105885 MRAC 230597 5.86000 −7.45000 R. megahanseni Legg, 1982 Ivory Coast JX951340
DNA105886 MRAC 230598 5.86000 −7.45000 R. megahanseni Legg, 1982 Ivory Coast JX951341
DNA102682 MCZ 1.65806 10.31139 Ricinoides sp. Equatorial Guinea JX951305 JX951343 JX951369 JX951396
DNA102688 MCZ 1.31583 11.02944 Ricinoides sp. Equatorial Guinea JX951308 JX951346
DNA102689 MCZ 1.65806 10.31139 Ricinoides sp. Equatorial Guinea JX951309 JX951347
DNA102690 MCZ 1.65833 10.31556 Ricinoides sp. Equatorial Guinea JX951310–1 JX951348 JX951372
Outgroups
Acari Ornithodoros moubata (Murray, 1877) L76355 NC_004357 NC_004357
Acari Haemaphysalis flava Neumann, 1897 NC_005292 NC_005292
Acari Ixodes hexagonus Leach, 1815 NC_002010 NC_002010
Acari Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806) L76342 NC_002074 NC_002074
Acari Carios capensis (Neumann, 1901) NC_005291 NC_005291
Amblypygi Phrynus sp. NC_010775 NC_010775
Araneae Calisoga longitarsis (Simon, 1891) NC_010780 NC_010780
Araneae Haplopelma schmidti von Wirth, 1991 AY425722.1 NC_005925 NC_005925
Araneae Habronattus oregonensis (Peckham & Peckham, 1888) NC_005942 NC_005942
Araneae Nephila clavata L. Koch, 1878 NC_008063 NC_008063
Araneae Hypochilus thorelli Marx, 1888 AF303505 NC_010777 NC_010777
Araneae Heptathela hangzhouensis Chen, Zhang & Zhu 1981 AY425719.1 NC_005924 NC_005924
Scorpiones Buthus occitanus (Amoreux, 1789) NC_010765 NC_010765
Scorpiones Centruroides limpidus (Karsch, 1879) NC_006896 NC_006896
Scorpiones Mesobuthus martensii (Karsch, 1879) FJ948787.1 FJ948787.1 NC_009738 NC_009738
Scorpiones Uroctonus mordax Thorell, 1876 NC_010782 NC_010782
Solifugae Eremobates palpisetulosus (Fichter, 1941) NC_010779 NC_010779
Solifugae Nothopuga sp. EU024482 EU024482
Uropygi Mastigoproctus giganteus (Lucas, 1835) AF005446 AY859587.1 NC_010430 NC_010430
Opiliones Phalangium opilio Linnaeus, 1758 AF124937 NC_010766 NC_010766
Xiphosura Limulus polyphemus (Linnaeus, 1758) L81949 AF212167 NC_003057 NC_003057

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Map of Western and Central Africa showing localities of the African Ricinulei samples from which DNA was sequenced for the present study. Land cover map after Mayaux et al. [15]. Hypothetical refugia at the Last Glacial Maximum after Maley [1].

DNA extraction and sequencing were conducted using protocols optimized for other arachnids [16,17] for the following genes: 12S rRNA (12S), cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, 18S rRNA (18S) and 28S rRNA (28S). Sequences were aligned using Muscle v. 3.7 [18]. Divergence time estimation was performed in a Bayesian framework using Beast v. 1.5.4 [19], with an uncorrelated lognormal model of rate evolution [20]. This approach integrates the uncertainty of calibration points and topology, considered important because the phylogenetic placement of Ricinulei within Arachnida remains uncertain [21].

Beast does not use a coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), potentially making it more prone to becoming trapped in local optima. A maximum-likelihood analysis was, therefore, performed using RAxML HPC v. 7.2.7 alpha [22] with a GTR + gamma model applied to each gene. The optimal tree was then used as an initial starting tree for Beast. Arachnid diversification was constrained based on the oldest known fossils [23], using an exponential distribution prior and setting the standard deviation to obtain a 95 per cent range between 428 (oldest known fossil arachnid, a scorpion) and 445 Ma (oldest known fossil chelicerate, a horse-shoe crab). The Beast analysis was run for 60 million generations with sampling every 1000 generations.

3. Results and discussion

The results recover the monophyly of Ricinulei and its component genera, Cryptocellus, Pseudocellus and Ricinoides, with high support (figure 2). The origin of the group (the divergence from its sister group) is dated to around 250 Ma. The oldest known fossil ricinuleid (not considered part of the Neoricinulei crown group), dated to 319 Ma [24], is concordant with the 95% confidence interval on the tree, and independently corroborates the analytical results and biogeographic conclusions. Ricinoides is sister to one of the two Neotropical genera, Pseudocellus, suggesting that the entire diversification of Ricinulei predates the fragmentation of Gondwana. This biogeographic interpretation, previously proposed based on morphological evidence [25], is corroborated by the molecular dating. Based on the results presented here, the diversification of Ricinoides in Western and Central Africa occurred in the Late Cretaceous, around 88 ± 33 Ma. Specimens from Guinea and Ivory Coast group with those from Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea and Gabon, probably an artefact of missing data (lack of mitochondrial gene sequences for the former; table 1). Samples from the Ivory Coast group with the remaining West African samples in the maximum-likelihood analysis, as expected based on their similar morphology and geographical proximity. Among the West African samples, the divergence between Ricinoides atewa Naskrecki, 2008 and other species from Senegal and Guinea-Bissau is dated to around 44 Ma.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Maximum credibility tree for African Ricinulei and outgroup taxa, obtained by Bayesian inference in Beast [19]. 95% Confidence intervals for ages are represented by bars at nodes. Clade posterior probabilities above 50% are indicated above nodes and maximum-likelihood bootstrap frequencies below nodes. Posterior distributions for nodes of interest are also depicted below the tree. Palaeogeographic maps from Ron Blakey, NAU Geology at http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~rcb7/.

Tropical forest biodiversity is lower in Africa than in South America and Southeast Asia [26]. This difference has been attributed to extinctions caused by forest fragmentation and potentially even the complete disappearance of the forest during past periods of severe aridification [5]. This is exemplified by the low diversity of another ancient group of soil animals, velvet worms (Onychophora Grube, 1853), with a single species of Peripatidae Evans, 1901 in tropical Africa (Gabon and Cameroon), when compared with four species in Southeast Asia and 68 in the Neotropics [27]. The relatively low diversity of the tropical African forests is consistent with the majority of molecular evidence, which suggests that rainforest endemics are mostly recent (Late Miocene–Pleistocene) and diversified according to the refugial speciation model [4].

The results presented provide molecular evidence for an endemic African rainforest taxon, Ricinoides, the origin of which can be traced to the fragmentation of Gondwana, and confirms evidence from other ground-dwelling arthropods [28] for an early diversification in the Late Cretaceous, around 90 Ma, in Western and Central Africa. This period corresponds to a time of diversification among angiosperms and associated reduction in gymnosperm diversity, documented in the Cenomanian stage of the Late Cretaceous [29]. Even if the Mesozoic rainforests were structurally and compositionally different from those in present-day tropical Africa, stratified forests may have been present since the Late Cretaceous, based on the presence of large seeds and fruits in the fossil record [30]. The major divergence observed among species in Western and Central Africa around 90 Ma could be the result of vicariance caused by successive marine incursions (figure 2) that commenced in the Late Cretaceous [31]. Refugia may also have played a role in allopatric speciation on a smaller scale for more recent species in the area of present-day Cameroon and Gabon.

The results presented suggest further that ancient diversifications exist in Western and Central Africa and the biodiversity of this region may have been greater during Late Cretaceous to Palaeocene times. Climate change may have depleted diversity after the separation of Africa and South America, with subsequent stable refugia acting as ‘museums’ for ancient lineages. In this respect, the data are largely congruent with the fossil record, which suggests that entire lineages of Neotropical palms were present in Africa until at least the Late Oligocene (27–28 Ma) [7]. Such models [5] may have received little support from molecular studies until now (but see [6]), because few phylogeographic studies have been conducted on old lineages with high endemism and low population density (see electronic supplementary material). Furthermore, extinction rates are difficult to infer from molecular studies [32] in the absence of fossils from outside the putative refugia. Ricinoides thus represents one of the oldest endemic African genera for which the origin, early diversification and subsequent survival in Miocene forest refugia has been studied and tested phylogenetically.

Acknowledgements

J.M. was supported by ‘Investissement d'Avenir’ grants managed by Agence Nationale de la Recherche (CEBA, ref. ANR-10-LABX-0025; TULIP, ref. ANR-10-LABX-41). Fieldwork was supported by Putnam Expedition grants from the Museum of Comparative Zoology and by the American Museum of Natural History. This work was supported by U.S. National Science Foundation grant nos DEB-0328644, DEB-1144417, DEB-1144492 and EAR-0228699 and from a Selective Excellence grant from The George Washington University. Several samples were made available by J. Longino's LLAMA project (NSF DEB-064015). G. Chassan-Jouolieu, J. Huff, N. Legrand, J. Mavoungou, C. Prieto and V. Vignoli assisted with fieldwork. P. Naskrecki and R. Jocqué provided additional specimens. IRET Gabon provided logistical support. D. Dimitrov and V. Nicolas commented on the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Maley J. 1989. Late Quaternary climatic changes in the African rain forest: forest refugia and the major role of sea surface temperature variations. In Paleoclimatology and paleometeorology: modern and past patterns of global atmospheric transport, vol. 282 (eds Leinen M, Sarnthein M.), pp. 585–616 Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hamilton AC, Taylor D. 1991. History of climate and forests in tropical Africa during the last 8 million years. Clim. Change 19, 65–78 10.1007/BF00142215 (doi:10.1007/BF00142215) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haffer J. 1969. Speciation in Amazonian forest birds. Science 165, 131–137 10.1126/science.165.3889.131 (doi:10.1126/science.165.3889.131) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Plana V. 2004. Mechanisms and tempo of evolution in the African Guineo–Congolian rainforest. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359, 1585–1594 10.1098/rstb.2004.1535 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1535). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hamilton AC. 1976. The significance of patterns of distribution shown by forest plants and animals in tropical Africa for the reconstruction of upper Pleistocene palaeoenvironments: a review. In Palaeoecology of Africa & of the surrounding islands & Antarctica, vol. 9 (ed. Van Zinderen Bakker EM.), pp. 63–97 Cape Town, South Africa: A.A. Balkema [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Evans BJ, Kelley DC, Tinsley RC, Melnick DJ, Cannatella DC. 2004. A mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of African clawed frogs: phylogeography and implications for polyploid evolution. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33, 197–213 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.04.018 (doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2004.04.018) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pan AD, Jacobs BF, Dransfield J, Baker WJ. 2006. The fossil history of palms (Arecaceae) in Africa and new records from the Late Oligocene (28–27 Mya) of north-western Ethiopia. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 151, 69–81 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00523.x (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00523.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Selden PA. 1992. Revision of the fossil ricinuleids. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 83, 595–634 10.1017/S0263593300003333 (doi:10.1017/S0263593300003333) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pollock J. 1967. Notes on the biology of Ricinulei (Arachnida). J. West Afr. Sci. Assoc. 12, 19–22 [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Harvey MS. 2002. The neglected cousins: what do we know about the smaller arachnid orders? J. Arachnol. 30, 357–372 10.1636/0161-8202(2002)030[0357:TNCWDW]2.0.CO;2 (doi:10.1636/0161-8202(2002)030[0357:TNCWDW]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cooke JAL. 1967. Observations on the biology of Ricinulei (Arachnida) with descriptions of two new species of Cryptocellus. J. Zool. Lond. 151, 31–42 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1967.tb02864.x (doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1967.tb02864.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Valdez-Mondragón A, Francke OF. 2011. Four new species of the genus Pseudocellus (Arachnida: Ricinulei: Ricinoididae) from Mexico. J. Arachnol. 39, 365–377 10.1636/Ha11-02.1 (doi:10.1636/Ha11-02.1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Naskrecki P. 2008. A new ricinuleid of the genus Ricinoides Ewing (Arachnida, Ricinulei) from Ghana. Zootaxa 1698, 57–64 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Penney D, Marusik Y, Wheater CP, Langan AM. 2009. First Gambian Ricinulei (Arachnida: Ricinoididae): northernmost African record for the order. Zootaxa 2021, 66–68 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mayaux P, Bartholomé E, Fritz S, Belward A. 2004. A new land-cover map of Africa for the year 2000. J. Biogeogr. 31, 861–877 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01073.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01073.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Murienne J, Harvey MS, Giribet G. 2008. First molecular phylogeny of the major clades of Pseudoscorpiones (Arthropoda: Chelicerata). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 49, 170–184 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.06.002 (doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.06.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Murienne J, Karaman I, Giribet G. 2010. Explosive evolution of an ancient group of Cyphophthalmi (Arachnida: Opiliones) in the Balkan Peninsula. J. Biogeogr. 37, 90–102 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02180.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02180.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 10.1093/nar/gkh340 (doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. Beast: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 214. 10.1186/1471-2148-7-214 (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-214) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A. 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLOS Biol. 4, e88. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088 (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dunlop JA, Kamenz C, Talarico G. 2009. A fossil trigonotarbid arachnid with a ricinuleid-like pedipalpal claw. Zoomorphology 128, 305–313 10.1007/s00435-009-0090-z (doi:10.1007/s00435-009-0090-z) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 2688–2690 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 (doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dunlop JA. 2010. Geological history and phylogeny of Chelicerata. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 39, 124–142 10.1016/j.asd.2010.01.003 (doi:10.1016/j.asd.2010.01.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brauckmann C. 1987. Neue Arachniden (Ricinuleida, Trigonotarbida) aus dem Namurium B vin Hagen-Vorhalle (Ober-Karbon; West-Deutschland). Dort. Beit. Land. 21, 97–109 [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Platnick NI. 1980. On the phylogeny of Ricinulei. In 8 Internationaler Arachnologen-Kongreß, Abgehalten an der Universitat fur Bodenkultur Wien 721 Juli (ed. Gruber J.), pp. 349–353 Vienna, Austria: H. Egermann [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Richards PW. 1973. Africa, the odd man out. In Tropical forest ecosystems in Africa and South America: a comparative review (eds Meggers BJ, Ayensu ES, Duckworth WD.) pp. 21–26 Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press [Google Scholar]
  • 27.de Sena Oliveira I, Read VM, Mayer G. 2012. A world checklist of Onychophora (velvet worms), with notes on nomenclature and status of names. ZooKeys 211, 1–70 10.3897/zookeys.211.3463 (doi:10.3897/zookeys.211.3463) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Giribet G, Vogt L, Pérez-González A, Sharma P, Kury AB. 2010. A multilocus approach to harvestman (Arachnida: Opiliones) phylogeny with emphasis on biogeography and the systematics of Laniatores. Cladistics 26, 408–437 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00296.x (doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00296.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jacobs BF. 2004. Palaeobotanical studies from tropical Africa: relevance to the evolution of forest, woodland and savannah biomes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359, 1573–1583 10.1098/rstb.2004.1533 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1533) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Morley RJ. 2000. Origin and evolution of tropical rain forests. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Burke K, Gunnell Y. 2008. The African erosion surface: a continental-scale synthesis of geomorphology, tectonics, and environmental change over the past 180 million years. (Memoir 201) Boulder, CO: The Geological Society of America [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rabosky DL. 2010. Extinction rates should not be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Evolution 64, 1816–1824 (doi:10.1111/j.1558–5646.2009.00926.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biology Letters are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES