Skip to main content
Pharmacological Reviews logoLink to Pharmacological Reviews
. 2013 Jan;65(1):105–142. doi: 10.1124/pr.111.005512

Therapeutic Potential of Mood Stabilizers Lithium and Valproic Acid: Beyond Bipolar Disorder

Chi-Tso Chiu 1, Zhifei Wang 1, Joshua G Hunsberger 1, De-Maw Chuang 1,
Editor: David R Sibley
PMCID: PMC3565922  PMID: 23300133

Abstract

The mood stabilizers lithium and valproic acid (VPA) are traditionally used to treat bipolar disorder (BD), a severe mental illness arising from complex interactions between genes and environment that drive deficits in cellular plasticity and resiliency. The therapeutic potential of these drugs in other central nervous system diseases is also gaining support. This article reviews the various mechanisms of action of lithium and VPA gleaned from cellular and animal models of neurologic, neurodegenerative, and neuropsychiatric disorders. Clinical evidence is included when available to provide a comprehensive perspective of the field and to acknowledge some of the limitations of these treatments. First, the review describes how action at these drugs’ primary targets—glycogen synthase kinase-3 for lithium and histone deacetylases for VPA—induces the transcription and expression of neurotrophic, angiogenic, and neuroprotective proteins. Cell survival signaling cascades, oxidative stress pathways, and protein quality control mechanisms may further underlie lithium and VPA’s beneficial actions. The ability of cotreatment to augment neuroprotection and enhance stem cell homing and migration is also discussed, as are microRNAs as new therapeutic targets. Finally, preclinical findings have shown that the neuroprotective benefits of these agents facilitate anti-inflammation, angiogenesis, neurogenesis, blood-brain barrier integrity, and disease-specific neuroprotection. These mechanisms can be compared with dysregulated disease mechanisms to suggest core cellular and molecular disturbances identifiable by specific risk biomarkers. Future clinical endeavors are warranted to determine the therapeutic potential of lithium and VPA across the spectrum of central nervous system diseases, with particular emphasis on a personalized medicine approach toward treating these disorders.

I. Introduction

The mood stabilizers lithium and valproic acid (VPA) are primarily used to treat bipolar disorder (BD), a common, severe, and chronic mental illness that affects approximately 1%–3% of the population and is one of the major causes of disability worldwide (for review, see Goodwin and Jamison, 2007). However, accumulating evidence indicates that these agents also hold promise for treating neurologic and/or neurodegenerative diseases via their diverse mechanisms of action. To provide a clear and comprehensive picture of the mechanisms that may underlie the beneficial effects of lithium and VPA, this review focuses on two primary targets: glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) for lithium and histone deacetylases (HDACs) for VPA. Here, we propose that GSK-3 and HDAC inhibition are critical to the facilitation of the numerous molecular mechanisms that may be exploited for therapeutic use. We anticipate that novel therapies will emerge from characterizing the mechanisms used by lithium and VPA either as monotherapy or in combination; both will be considered in great detail in this review.

Although lithium and VPA have long been used to treat BD, the mechanisms underlying their therapeutic effects remain elusive. Furthermore, it is likely that the interactions of many different genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors contribute to this complex and heterogeneous mood disorder. Although the etiology of BD remains poorly understood, it is believed to involve multiple factors, including dysregulation of signaling pathways and gene expression, loss of synaptic plasticity, decreased cellular resilience, reduced brain cell density, and abnormalities in neuroanatomical structure and function. Lithium may counteract some of these deficits via its neurotrophic effects; for example, it has been shown to affect brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in individuals with BD (Suwalska et al., 2010; de Sousa et al., 2011). In addition, lithium treatment has been shown to increase gray matter volume in patients with BD in whole brain, cortex, hippocampus, and anterior cingulate (Sassi et al., 2002; Bearden et al., 2007, 2008; Moore et al., 2000b, 2009). Lithium also increases brain volume in limbic structures, such as the hippocampus (Yucel et al., 2007, 2008), that are implicated in emotional regulation. Untreated patients with BD showed decreased left anterior cingulate volumes compared with either healthy control subjects or lithium-treated patients (Sassi et al., 2004). N-Acetyl-aspartate (NAA), a putative marker for neuronal viability and function, was also reported to be increased in the brain of patients with BD after lithium treatment (Moore et al., 2000a; Hajek et al., 2012). Of interest, increased gray matter volume was found in patients with BD who responded clinically to lithium, suggesting a therapeutic role for this neurotrophic effect in clinical response to lithium (Moore et al., 2009; Lyoo et al., 2010). Collectively, this indirect evidence suggests that lithium augments neurotrophic mechanisms in BD and warrants further investigation in other brain diseases.

This review discusses numerous mechanisms used by lithium and VPA that may be effective in treating other central nervous system (CNS) disorders. We scrutinize neurologic disease mechanisms implicated in stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), Huntington’s disease (HD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and Fragile X Syndrome (FXS). In particular, preclinical evidence of the mechanisms used by these mood stabilizers to thwart disease processes and achieve their beneficial effects will be presented. These include neurotrophism, neuroprotection, oxidative stress, protein quality control, anti-inflammation, stem cell migration, neurovascular remodeling, blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity, and microRNA (miRNA) regulation. There are similarities and differences in the biologic processes affected by lithium and VPA (Gupta et al., 2012). Both lithium and VPA have multiple targets in addition to GSK-3 and HDACs; however, it is beyond the scope of this review to consider all of these. The interested reader is referred to several excellent reviews describing additional targets (Jope, 2003, 2011; Gould and Manji, 2005; Zarate et al., 2006; Hunsberger et al., 2009; Chiu and Chuang, 2010; Quiroz et al., 2010).

A. Lithium and GSK-3

For more than half a century, the monovalent cation lithium has been the primary drug used to treat BD. It is effective against acute mania, prophylactic for recurrent manic and depressive episodes, and reduces the risk of suicide (Geddes et al., 2004; Cipriani et al., 2005; Ohgami et al., 2009). It can also augment the efficacy of antidepressants commonly used for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) (Crossley and Bauer, 2007). At therapeutic serum concentrations (0.6−1.2 mM), lithium is known to inhibit a group of phosphomonoesterases in mammals, including inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase, inositol monophosphate phosphatase, fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase, and bisphosphate nucleotidase, in addition to the metabolic enzyme phosphoglucomutase and GSK-3. Downstream effectors, such as adenylate cyclase, the phosphoinositol cascade, and metabolism of arachidonic acid, are also affected by lithium treatment (for a review, see Quiroz et al., 2004; Gould et al., 2004c; Rao and Rapoport, 2009). Although the mood-stabilizing effects of lithium may result from inhibiting these enzymes, the multifaceted protein GSK-3 is believed to be the main facilitator of lithium’s mood stabilizing and neuroprotective effects, because of its array of cellular and physiologic functions (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A schematic illustration of the central hypothesis of molecular actions of mood stabilizers lithium and VPA. Through the inhibition of GSK-3 and HDACs, respectively, lithium and VPA are hypothesized to regulate the transcription and expression of factors critically involved in neuroprotective, neurotrophic, anti-inflammatory, neurogenic and angiogenic, mood-stabilizing, antidepressant-like, and anxiolytic effects, in addition to regulating stem cell migration and miRNAs. The underlying mechanisms of these actions have been elucidated by both in vitro and in vivo experimental settings and are discussed in this review. Lines with solid arrows represent stimulatory connections; lines with flattened ends represent inhibitory connections. Dashed lines represent pathways with reduced activity as a result of drug treatment.

GSK-3 is an evolutionarily conserved, ubiquitous serine-threonine kinase consisting of α and β isoforms (for a review, see Chiu and Chuang, 2010). GSK-3 dysfunction has been linked to the pathophysiology of mood disorders, schizophrenia, AD, diabetes, and others (reviewed in Meijer et al., 2004; Huang and Klein, 2006; Jope et al., 2007; Chiu and Chuang, 2010; Li and Jope, 2010). In rodent models, the pharmacological inhibition or gene knockout/knockdown of GSK-3 mimicked lithium’s antidepressant and anti-manic effects (Kaidanovich-Beilin et al., 2004, 2009; O'Brien et al., 2004; Gould et al., 2004b; Rosa et al., 2008; Jope, 2011; Omata et al., 2011). Despite limited clinical data, some evidence from genetic and postmortem studies supports the role of GSK-3 in mood disorders (for a review, see Jope, 2011). For example, elevated GSK-3 activity was found in post mortem samples from individuals with MDD (Karege et al., 2007, 2011), whereas serine-phosphorylation of GSK-3 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was identified to be decreased with disease and increased after therapy (Li et al., 2007, 2010b).

Lithium inhibits GSK-3 by binding directly to the enzyme’s magnesium-sensitive site (Klein and Melton, 1996; Stambolic et al., 1996) and indirectly by enhancing phosphorylation of this kinase at specific serine residues. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway was found to mediate the indirect inhibitory effects of lithium on this enzyme by elevating phosphorylation of GSK-3α at Ser21 (Chalecka-Franaszek and Chuang, 1999), providing the first evidence that lithium indirectly inhibits GSK-3 via enhanced phosphorylation. In addition, GSK-3β activity can also be negatively regulated by its phosphorylation at Ser9 (Jope, 2003). To date, multiple mechanisms have been identified that contribute to GSK-3 phosphorylation, including the 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)–dependent activation of protein kinase A (PKA) (Jope, 1999); the PI3K-dependent activation of protein kinase C (PKC) (Kirshenboim et al., 2004); and the enhanced inhibition of protein phosphatase-l through the action of inhibitor-2 complex, which auto-regulates GSK-3 (Zhang et al., 2003). A mouse study further showed that lithium increased the serine phosphorylation of GSK-3 by disrupting the formation of β-arrestin 2/protein phosphatase 2A/Akt complex that dephosphorylated and inactivated Akt (Beaulieu et al., 2008). Because a complete analysis of the neurobiology of GSK-3′s action is beyond the scope of the current review, we refer interested readers to several excellent reviews on the subject (Jope, 2003, 2011; Meijer et al., 2004; Rowe and Chuang, 2004; Huang and Klein, 2006; Jope and Roh, 2006; Rowe et al., 2007; Chiu and Chuang, 2010; Li and Jope, 2010).

B. VPA and HDACs

Several anti-convulsants—VPA, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine—are also effective in treating BD (Yatham, 2004). Similar to lithium, VPA has strong anti-manic effects, but it is less effective against depressive episodes. It has been suggested that the efficacy of VPA in BD results from enhanced γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission and the inhibition of enzymes involved in GABA metabolism, such as succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase, succinate semialdehyde reductase, and GABA transaminase (for a review, see Gould et al., 2004c). In addition, the anti-convulsive action of VPA is thought to be mediated by its inhibitory effects on the sodium channel at high frequencies (reviewed in Macdonald and Kelly, 1995). VPA also inhibits HDACs at therapeutic serum levels (0.4−0.8 mM) (Fig. 1).

Histone proteins organize DNA into nucleosomes, which are regular repeating structures of chromatin. This organization is required for the efficient packaging of large amounts of eukaryotic genomic DNA. In the process of deacetylation, HDACs remove charge-neutralizing acetyl groups from the lysine residues on tails of histones and favor a more transcriptionally inactive chromatin conformation. In contrast, histone acetyltransferases (HATs) increase acetylation and favor a more transcriptionally active chromatin conformation. Therefore, VPA inhibits HDACs to promote a more transcriptionally active chromatin structure.

HDACs fall into at least two major classes: class I contains isoforms 1–3 and 8, and class II contains isoforms 4–7 and 9–10 (Chuang et al., 2009). At clinically relevant levels, VPA effectively inhibits HDAC (Gottlicher et al., 2001; Phiel et al., 2001), making it valuable for investigations into the therapeutic role of chromatin remodeling in disorders of the CNS. VPA and its analogs inhibit the activity of HDAC isoforms from both classes, although it appears not to affect HDAC6 and 10 isoforms that belong to class IIb (Gurvich et al., 2004). VPA significantly inhibits class I and, to a lesser extent, class II HDACs (Gottlicher et al., 2001). However, a more recent work indicated that VPA’s inhibition of class II HDACs might be attributable to the contaminating activities of class I HDACs (Fass et al., 2010). Additional studies are necessary to clarify this issue. The epigenetic control of genes through modification of histones and the resultant remodeling of chromatin has been shown to profoundly affect development, synaptic plasticity, learning, memory, drug abuse, alcoholism, circadian rhythm, and the efficacy of antidepressants (Abel and Zukin, 2008; McClung and Nestler, 2008; Chuang et al., 2009).

II. Neuroprotective Effects of Mood Stabilizers

Harnessing the ability of mood stabilizers to enhance neuroprotection has therapeutic implications for a wide range of CNS diseases. We begin by highlighting the critical signaling molecules and mechanisms that contribute to the neuroprotective actions of lithium and VPA, including selected neurotrophic, angiogenic, and anti-apoptotic factors; survival signaling cascades; oxidative stress pathways; and protein quality control mechanisms. We then discuss the augmented therapeutic effects of combined lithium and VPA treatment achieved in primary cultured neurons and stem cells and provide evidence for miRNAs as novel targets and facilitators of lithium and VPA.

A. Neurotrophic and Angiogenic Factors Modulated by Lithium and VPA

Neurotrophic and angiogenic factors play vital roles during neural development and synaptic plasticity. Most neurotrophic factors, which enhance the growth and survival of developing neurons and maintain the vitality of mature neurons, fall into one of three broad families as follows: 1) neurotrophins (Huang and Reichardt, 2001), 2) glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) family ligands (Paratcha and Ledda, 2008), and 3) neuropoietic cytokines (Bauer et al., 2007). Angiogenic factors, which support the formation of new vasculature from preexisting blood vessels, have been implicated in numerous disease mechanisms (reviewed in Carmeliet, 2003). This section focuses on BDNF, GDNF, and angiogenic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), three key factors augmented after the administration of lithium or VPA.

1. BDNF

BDNF, which signals through the TrkB receptor to augment cortical development, synaptic plasticity, neurogenesis, and neuronal survival, is known to play a vital role in neuropsychiatric disorders (for a review, see Autry and Monteggia, 2012). Evidence also exists that the neuroprotective effects of lithium and VPA are facilitated, at least in part, by the induction of BDNF and activation of its receptor. Pretreatment with lithium or BDNF, for instance, protected primary cortical neurons against glutamate excitotoxicity (Hashimoto et al., 2002b), and conversely, use of a Trk tyrosine kinase inhibitor or BDNF-neutralizing antibody negated this neuroprotection. An extension of this study demonstrated that lithium treatment both increased BDNF protein levels and activated its receptor and that lithium-induced neuroprotection did not occur in cortical neurons derived from both homozygous and heterozygous BDNF-knockout mice.

Building on these findings, additional studies showed that both lithium and VPA increased levels of exon IV–containing BDNF mRNA and increased the activity of BDNF promoter IV in cortical neurons (Yasuda et al., 2009). In addition, GSK-3 inhibition contributed to the lithium-induced activation of BDNF promoter IV, whereas GSK-3 inhibitors mimicked this activation. Conversely, HDAC inhibition contributed to VPA-induced promoter IV activation. In hypoxia, chronic lithium treatment is known to be neuroprotective (as measured by cerebral glucose metabolic rate), apparently because it elevates levels of BDNF protein and phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) (Omata et al., 2008). In addition to its neuroprotective effects, BDNF has been found to enhance neurogenesis, contributing further to the therapeutic effects of lithium (Chen et al., 2000; Wexler et al., 2008) and VPA (Hao et al., 2004; Laeng et al., 2004). Clinically, lithium treatment augmented serum levels of BDNF in patients with early AD (Leyhe et al., 2009). These results support BDNF regulation in a clinical population and suggest considerable potential of this regulation for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

2. GDNF

Lithium and VPA have been shown, in vivo and in vitro, to regulate GDNF, in which pleiotropic functions include migration, chemo-attraction, and differentiation (on neuroblasts) and axonal growth, axonal guidance, survival, and synapse function (on neurons) (for a review, see Paratcha and Ledda, 2008). In rat models of depression, six weeks of lithium treatment increased GDNF protein levels in hippocampus, striatum, and prefrontal cortex, and these increases appeared to contribute to the drug’s antidepressant-like effects (Angelucci et al., 2003). Both lithium and GDNF, moreover, protected against mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-mediated apoptosis induced by aluminum (Savory et al., 2003).

VPA has also been shown, in primary neuronal-glial cocultures from rat midbrain, to protect against neurotoxicity induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), in part because of its inhibitory effects on pro-inflammatory factors (Peng et al., 2005). In a similar midbrain neuronal-glial coculture, astrocytes were shown to release GDNF and BDNF, which mediate VPA’s neuroprotective effects on dopaminergic neurons (Chen et al., 2006). Other HDAC inhibitors have also been demonstrated to exert neuroprotective effects. In neuronal-glial cocultures, for instance, sodium butyrate (SB) and trichostatin A (TSA) protected dopaminergic neurons by inducing GDNF and, possibly, BDNF in astrocytes (Wu et al., 2008). Finally, after spinal cord injury, GDNF and BDNF may have contributed to the improvement of locomotion produced by VPA treatment (Lv et al., 2012).

3. VEGF

VEGF is a prominent angiogenic factor (Ferrara et al., 2003) that induces and promotes angiogenesis to increase trophic support through the formation of new blood vessels from existing vasculature. Angiogenesis then should be considered as an important mechanism that offers trophic and neuroprotective effects to neuronal and glial cells, in addition to enhancing neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity where VEGF has been implicated (Newton et al., 2003; Newton and Duman, 2004; Warner-Schmidt and Duman, 2007). VEGF’s angiogenic signals are mediated through two primary receptors, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, that play a variety of roles. These include inducing anti-apoptotic proteins (such as B-cell lymphoma 2 [Bcl-2]) to preserve endothelial cells and promoting monocyte chemotaxis in bone marrow–derived cells to induce vascular leakage (reviewed by Ferrara et al., 2003).

VEGF has been shown to modulate neurogenesis (Jin et al., 2002) and contribute to the behavioral actions of antidepressants (Warner-Schmidt and Duman, 2007). In addition to antidepressants, VEGF is also regulated by mood stabilizers. In cultured brain cells, for instance, treatment with lithium increased VEGF levels in both endothelial cells and astrocytes. This increase in endothelial cells, moreover, was associated with enhanced GSK-3β Ser9 phosphorylation, an effect mimicked by the GSK-3 inhibitor SB216763 (Guo et al., 2009) and blocked by the PI3K inhibitor LY294002. In contrast, SB216763 did not mimic, nor did LY294002 affect, lithium upregulation of VEGF in astrocytes, although LY294002 abolished lithium-induced GSK-3 phosphorylation, suggesting cell type–specific regulatory mechanisms.

In cultured endothelial cells, VPA enhanced VEGF-induced angiogenesis (Jin et al., 2011). Chronic postinsult treatment with VPA increased VEGF protein levels in the ischemic cerebral cortex (Wang et al., 2012). This VEGF upregulation was mediated by the transcription factor hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and contributed to angiogenesis and functional recovery after ischemic stroke in rats (see section III.A).

B. Factors Affecting Apoptotic Signaling: Bcl-2, p53, Bax, Caspase Signaling, and HSP70

Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, involves numerous biochemical signaling cascades. Both lithium and VPA increased mRNA expression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 in rat frontal cortex (Chen et al., 1999b). In a mouse model of ALS, VPA and two other HDAC inhibitors were shown to upregulate Bcl-2 mRNA in spinal cord (Rouaux et al., 2007). In primary brain neuronal cultures challenged with glutamate excitotoxicity mediated by N-methyl d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, lithium increased the expression of Bcl-2, decreased the expression of the proapoptotic proteins p53 and Bax, and suppressed the mitochondrial release of glutamate-induced cytochrome c (Chen and Chuang, 1999). Pretreatment with lithium, moreover, prevented the activation of caspase-3 cleavage of lamin B1 that usually results from mitochondrial release of cytochrome c. In addition to modulating anti-apoptotic and proapoptotic proteins, lithium was found to modulate NMDA receptor–mediated synaptic activity and excitotoxicity by attenuating the constitutive phosphorylation at Tyr1472 of the NR2B subunit of the NMDA receptor, which is activated by the Src tyrosine kinase Fyn (Hashimoto et al., 2002a, 2003a).

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are a group of molecular chaperones that assist in regulating protein folding and refolding of misfolded proteins, where they help restore cellular homeostasis and promote cell survival (see section II.E). Studies have found that HSPs, such as HSP70, exert a wide variety of neuroprotective effects against apoptosis (Takayama et al., 2003) through varied mechanisms, ranging from antagonizing apoptosis-inducing factors (Ravagnan et al., 2001), inhibiting the activation of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) by stabilizing IκB protein (Feinstein et al., 1996; Zheng et al., 2008), stabilizing Akt-1 protein (Gao and Newton, 2002), and preventing mitochondrial cytochrome c release and caspase activation (Beere et al., 2000). Of interest, HSP70 expression is regulated by heat shock factor-1 (HSF-1), a transcription factor negatively regulated by GSK-3β–dependent phosphorylation (Bijur and Jope, 2000). The neuroprotective effects of lithium in a stroke model are in fact associated with a marked increase in the DNA binding activity of HSF-1 and subsequent elevations in the expression of HSP70 protein in the ischemic brain (Ren et al., 2003).

Findings from an experiment of SH-SY5Y cells challenged with the mitochondrial complex I inhibitor rotenone suggest that VPA’s neuroprotective effects may also involve HSP70 and may be associated with reductions in the release of cytochrome c and the cleavage of caspase-3 and -9 (Pan et al., 2005). In rat cortical neuronal cultures, HSP70 participated in VPA neuroprotection against short-term glutamate excitotoxicity. This VPA-induced HSP70 was triggered by inhibition of class I HDACs, as well as acetylation and recruitment of the transcription factor Sp1 at the HSP70 promoter (Marinova et al., 2009). In addition, VPA-induced HDAC inhibition also altered methylation levels of histone (H3K4Me2) at the HSP70 promoter and caused its induction in both neurons and astrocytes (Marinova et al., 2011). In various animal models, overexpression of HSP70 has been recognized as a potential therapeutic target against ischemic neuronal injury and will be discussed in detail in the section III.A.

C. Cell Survival Signaling Cascades

Activated by the stimulation of trophic-factor receptors on the cell surface, the neuroprotective mechanisms of lithium and VPA involve multiple survival signaling cascades, including the PI3K/Akt pathway, Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and the MAP kinase-kinase (MEK)/extracellular-signal regulated kinase (ERK) pathway.

1. The PI3K/Akt Pathway

BDNF induction is an early and essential step in lithium’s neuroprotection against glutamate excitotoxicity. BDNF’s trophic action is likely to be involved in lithium-induced activation of the cell survival PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK pathways. Activation of Akt, a serine/threonine kinase regulated by PI3K, involves phosphorylation at residues of Thr308 and Ser473 (Alessi and Cohen, 1998; Jacinto et al., 2006). In cultured rat cerebellar granule cells (CGCs), lithium treatment rapidly normalized glutamate-induced inactivation of Akt by activating PI3K and subsequently increasing the phosphorylation of Akt at its Ser473 residue (Chalecka-Franaszek and Chuang, 1999). After activation, Akt in turn affects several anti-apoptotic targets, including Bcl-2–associated death promoter, CREB, members of the forkhead family, and procaspase-9 (Neri et al., 2002; Nicholson and Anderson, 2002; Huang and Reichardt, 2003). In cultured human neuroblastoma cells, caspase-3 activation induced by neurotoxins that mimic neurochemical changes associated with Parkinson’s disease was inhibited by lithium treatment in a PI3K-dependent manner (King et al., 2001). Against HIV-induced toxicity, both in vitro and in vivo, lithium-induced neuroprotection appears to be mediated through the PI3K/Akt pathways (Everall et al., 2002; Dou et al., 2005). However, because some studies detected no changes in Akt phosphorylation levels at specific time points after the application of lithium in certain cell lines, the effects of lithium on the PI3K/Akt pathway may be cell type–specific and time-dependent (De Sarno et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2003).

Although considered to be an HDAC inhibitor, VPA has been reported to cause gradual increases in phosphorylation of Akt and GSK-3β at Ser473 and Ser9 residues, respectively, under some in vitro conditions (Chen et al., 1999a; De Sarno et al., 2002). Because lithium and VPA can both upregulate BDNF expression, VPA may increase GSK-3 phosphorylation via BDNF-mediated activation of the PI3K/Akt pathway. In fact, VPA has been implicated in the activation of both the PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK cellular signaling pathways (Kostrouchova et al., 2007). In cultured cortical neurons, pretreatment with either a PI3K or Akt inhibitor attenuated VPA-induced upregulation of HSP70 (Marinova et al., 2009). In a rat cerebral ischemia model, injection with other HDAC inhibitors augmented HSP70 and reversed ischemia-induced downregulation of Akt phosphorylation (Kim et al., 2007). A recent study in cultured human neuroblastoma cells also demonstrated that the effect of VPA on monoamine oxidase A induction was mediated by the PI3K/Akt/forkhead signaling pathway (Wu and Shih, 2011).

2. The Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway

By controlling axon remodeling and synapse formation, the Wnt pathway plays an important role in regulating neuronal connectivity in the nervous system (Ciani and Salinas, 2005). GSK-3 activity is also negatively regulated by Wnt-stimulated activation of the Frizzled receptor in addition to the aforementioned protein kinases (e.g., PKA, PKC, and Akt). As a substrate of GSK-3, the transcription factor β-catenin is part of the Wnt pathway, and its cytoplasmic levels are decreased by GSK-3 through phosphorylation-dependent proteasomal degradation (Jope and Johnson, 2004; Takahashi-Yanaga and Sasaguri, 2007). In conjunction with T cell–specific transcription factor (Tcf)/lymphoid enhancer binding factor (Lef), increases in cytoplasmic accumulations of β-catenin facilitate its translocation into the nucleus and, subsequently, enhance the transcription of diverse genes, such as growth factors (Sinha et al., 2005; Silva et al., 2007) and those involved in apoptotic inhibition (Feng, 1979; Seidensticker and Behrens, 2000; Huelsken and Behrens, 2002). Activation of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway has been shown to contribute to adult hippocampal neural progenitor cell proliferation triggered by lithium treatment (Wexler et al., 2008). At therapeutic concentrations, treatment with lithium was also found to increase β-catenin levels both in vitro (Stambolic et al., 1996; Chen and Chuang, 1999) and in vivo (O'Brien et al., 2004; Gould et al., 2004a) and to promote β-catenin–dependent transcriptional events (Jope and Johnson, 2004; O'Brien et al., 2004; Marmol, 2008).

Of interest, knockdown of β-catenin protein in mouse brain resulted in a depression-like phenotype (Gould et al., 2008), and overexpression of β-catenin mimicked the antidepressant-like effects of lithium (Gould et al., 2007). In addition, β-amyloid peptide (Aβ) toxicity in hippocampal slices was associated with loss of Wnt signaling function (Inestrosa et al., 2000), whereas chronic lithium treatment protected against Aβ-induced hippocampal neurodegeneration by activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in rat brains (De Ferrari et al., 2003). Lithium also inhibited HIV replication in a Wnt/β-catenin–dependent manner (Kumar et al., 2008). As a result, the idea that lithium-induced accumulation of β-catenin may account for much of its neuroprotective and therapeutic effects has led some to propose elevated β-catenin as a novel therapeutic strategy for treating mood disorders.

VPA also alters Wnt signaling in cultured human and animal cells and induces Wnt-dependent gene expression at doses that cause developmental effects (Wiltse, 2005). Upregulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and the subsequent imbalance of oxidative homeostasis produced by VPA administration during early pregnancy may facilitate susceptibility to autism (Zhang et al., 2012a). However, as mediated through the β-catenin-Lef-Tcf–dependent transcriptional activity, cotreatment with VPA was found to potentiate lithium-induced neuroprotective effects against excitotoxicity in aging CGCs (Leng et al., 2008). In addition, VPA altered angiogenic processes in human umbilical vein endothelial cells by increasing the expression of β-catenin and enhancing spheroid sprout formation (Jin et al., 2011). It has been suggested, in fact, that VPA-induced increases in acetylation and the nuclear translocation of β-catenin largely account for its ability to protect neurons from hypoxia-induced apoptosis and to improve animal survival after hemorrhagic shock (Leng et al., 2008).

3. The MEK/ERK Pathway

Another signaling pathway mediating the trophic actions and effects of lithium and VPA is the MEK/ERK cascade. The finding that both K252a and the MEK inhibitor U0126 blocked antidepressant-like effects induced by BDNF (Shirayama et al., 2002) supports the involvement of TrkB in the activation of the MEK/ERK pathway.

ERK regulates several downstream effector systems, such as NF-κB and ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK), and in turn inhibits GSK-3β and activates CREB (Chang et al., 2003; Steelman et al., 2004). CREB is a transcription factor and a common downstream target of both PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK pathways. When activated through phosphorylation, CREB is involved in cell survival by promoting the expression of cell-protective proteins, such as BDNF and Bcl-2 (Finkbeiner, 2000). Lithium treatment after ischemia was found to enhance ERK phosphorylation, whereas lithium-induced increases in BrdU-positive cells and improvement of cognitive function were prevented by U0126 (Yan et al., 2007). Because lithium has been reported to have opposite effects on the MEK/ERK pathway in different types of neural cells, it should be noted that lithium’s effects on this pathway may also be cell type–specific (Pardo et al., 2003).

VPA activates the ERK pathway, and activation of this cascade has been associated with its neuroprotective effects in a variety of cell types. In fact, VPA treatment not only increases the expression of ERK-regulated genes (such as Bcl-2), it has also been shown to promote neurite growth and cell survival in primary neurons and in the cultured human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y (Yuan et al., 2001; Di Daniel et al., 2005). In human umbilical vein endothelial cells, activation of the MEK/ERK pathway mediated VPA-induced phosphorylation of Bcl-2 and inhibition of serum starvation-induced apoptosis (Michaelis et al., 2006); in peripheral Schwann cells, VPA used the same signaling pathway to mediate the evocation of cell proliferation (Fei et al., 2011). Moreover, in a sleep deprivation animal model of manic-like behavior, VPA treatment prevented the attenuation of ERK activation, CREB phosphorylation, and the expression of Bcl-2 and BDNF in the frontal cortex (Park et al., 2012).

D. Oxidative Stress Pathways

Oxidative stress is caused by the imbalance between reactive oxygen species and the cell’s ability to quench these free radicals, which can lead to ensuing damage of the cellular proteins, lipids, DNA, and organelles, such as the mitochondria; it can also activate numerous stress-sensitive signaling processes (reviewed in Droge, 2002). Some of these stress-sensitive signaling processes overlap with the aforementioned survival signaling pathways (e.g., the MAPK signaling cascade), and others involve autophagy and mitochondrial dysfunction (Lee et al., 2012a). It is beyond the scope of this review to delve into specific stress-sensitive signaling pathways; we will only briefly discuss some of the evidence that oxidative stress pathways are implicated in diverse CNS disorders and facilitated by mood stabilizers.

Mood stabilizers have been reported to produce antioxidant effects that may contribute to their neuroprotective properties. For instance, chronic treatment with lithium (1 mM) or VPA (0.6 mM) protected human neural (SH-SY5Y) cell lines against oxidative stress, but not glial (SVG and U87) cell lines (Lai et al., 2006). This elegant study demonstrated that, when oxidative stress was induced by either 5μM rotenone or 100 μM H2O2, lithium and VPA treatment attenuated release of cytochrome c and activation of caspase 3 in SH-SY5Y cells. On the other hand, ER stress induced by 1 μM thapsigargin was not protected by either lithium or VPA. This suggests that the intrinsic mitochondrial apoptotic pathway may be important for these neuroprotective effects. In fact, the authors also reported that both lithium and VPA upregulated Bcl-2, an anti-apoptotic factor that can suppress release of cytochome c, during oxidative stress but not during ER stress in SH-SY5Y cells. However, another study found that chronic lithium or VPA treatment protected against thapsigargin-induced ER stress in PC12 cells (Hiroi et al., 2005). These discrepancies might be attributable to cell type differences and remain to be elucidated. GSK-3β inhibition was also neuroprotective after rotenone-induced oxidative stress but not H2O2-induced oxidative stress (Lai et al., 2006). Clearly, multiple mechanisms are at play to facilitate cell type–specific neuroprotection.

Oxidative stress mechanisms have also been evaluated in human B lymphoblast cell lines (BLCLs) from both healthy control subjects and patients with BD. In fact, increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been found in both plasma and serum samples from patients with BD (Kuloglu et al., 2002; Savas et al., 2006; Andreazza et al., 2009). These ROS can be sensed by a family of calcium-permeable ion channels, the transient receptor protein (TRP) family that has been implicated in the pathophysiology of BD-I (Xu et al., 2006, 2009; Andreopoulos et al., 2004; Perova et al., 2008). BLCLs were challenged with the oxidative stressor rotenone (2.5 and 10 μM), cell viability was monitored, and the expression and function of the TRP family ion channel (TRPM2 and TRPC3) were determined (Roedding et al., 2012). Cell viability was decreased after rotenone treatment, with BLCLs from individuals with BD-I found to be more susceptible to oxidative stress than control subjects. This study further implicates TRP family channels as contributing to the pathophysiology of BD, because of the changes in their regulation and functional response after oxidative stress.

Oxidative stress mechanisms have also been associated with manic episodes in BD. Elevated oxidative metabolism markers, including thriobarbituric acid reactive substances, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase were found to be elevated in unmedicated manic patients when compared with both lithium-treated manic patients and control subjects (Machado-Vieira et al., 2007). Furthermore, in healthy control subjects treated with therapeutic doses of lithium (2–4 weeks), selective decreases in oxidative stress markers were observed, including SOD and H2O2 (Khairova et al., 2012). This supports the notion that lithium has neuroprotective properties in healthy subjects, suggesting that these benefits may extend to the treatment of CNS diseases beyond BD. Oxidative stress has also been reported to exacerbate the development of symptoms in numerous human CNS disorders, including BD (Andreazza et al., 2008), stroke (Chen et al., 2011), TBI (Ansari et al., 2008), HD (Klepac et al., 2007), AD (Perry et al., 2002), and ALS (Barber and Shaw, 2010), suggesting that the antioxidant effects of mood stabilizers, which enhance neuroprotective mechanisms, may have broad utility in the treatment of numerous CNS disorders.

E. Protein Quality Control Mechanisms

1. Induction of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and Autophagy

In eukaryotic cells, the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and autophagy-lysosomal pathway are two major intracellular quality control mechanisms for protein clearance against abnormal protein accumulation (Ross and Poirier, 2005). As noted above, treatment with either lithium or VPA alone increased HSP70 expression both in vitro and in vivo (Klionsky and Emr, 2000; Levine and Kroemer, 2008). Through the UPS and autophagy, HSPs promote the degradation of abnormally folded proteins (Hendrick and Hartl, 1993; Fink, 1999; Ma and Hendershot, 2001; Hartl and Hayer-Hartl, 2002; Ross and Poirier, 2005). However, short-lived proteins, in general, are predominantly degraded by proteasomes, whereas aggregation-prone proteins appear to be better substrates for autophagic-lysosomal degradation (Klionsky and Emr, 2000; Levine and Kroemer, 2008).

Autophagy induction is considered to be a potential neuroprotective mechanism. Rapamycin is currently the most commonly used pharmacological agent for inducing autophagy, which it does by inhibiting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Of note, rapamycin has been shown to be beneficial in various models of neurodegenerative diseases (Ravikumar et al., 2004; Berger et al., 2006; Rubinsztein et al., 2007). The ability of lithium to deplete free inositol and subsequently decrease levels of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3), through inhibiting inositol monophosphatase and inositol transporters (Phiel and Klein, 2001), was identified as a novel mTOR-independent route for inducing autophagy (Sarkar et al., 2005; Sarkar and Rubinsztein, 2006). VPA, carbamazepine, and other mood stabilizers that decrease IP3 levels can also induce autophagy (Sarkar et al., 2005). At therapeutic concentrations, lithium not only facilitated the clearance of mutant huntingtin (mHtt) and α-synuclein (Sarkar et al., 2005) but also induced clearance of protease-resistant prion protein in prion-infected cells (Heiseke et al., 2009). This autophagy-inducing property of lithium has been demonstrated to be protective in ALS model mice (Fornai et al., 2008), and its use in combination with rapamycin has been proposed as a possible therapy in various animal models of HD (Sarkar et al., 2008). Together, these mechanisms are believed to be beneficial in neurodegenerative disorders characterized by the accumulation of misfolded proteins (Cuervo, 2004; Berger et al., 2006; Rubinsztein et al., 2007; Levine and Kroemer, 2008).

2. GRP78 Upregulation.

The ER is the primary site for protein synthesis, folding, and trafficking. It acts as an intracellular calcium repository and is highly sensitive to perturbation of its intraluminal environment. In addition to upregulating Bcl-2, lithium or VPA treatment was shown to protect against ER stress by upregulating a molecular chaperone of the HSP70 family, the 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78) (Hiroi et al., 2005). GRP78 binds to calcium, participates in protein folding, plays a role in stress-induced autophagy, and protects cells from the deleterious effects of misfolded proteins in the ER (Katayama et al., 1999; Kaufman, 1999; Yu et al., 1999; Ni et al., 2011). GRP78 can be induced by various apoptotic insults, including the ER calcium-ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin (Aoki et al., 1997; He et al., 2000). Triggered by calcium release from the ER, transcription factor c-Fos (a component of the activator protein 1 [AP-1] heterodimeric transcription factor complex) appears to be involved in thapsigargin’s induction of GRP78 (He et al., 2000), although the fact that the GRP78 promoter contains no recognizable AP-1–interacting sequence motifs (He et al., 2000) suggests that AP-1’s role in regulating GRP78 is only indirect.

In addition to upregulating GRP78 (Wang et al., 2001; Hiroi et al., 2005; Shao et al., 2006), lithium similarly induced c-Fos expression and subsequent AP-1–binding activity (Kalasapudi et al., 1990; Gao et al., 1993; Ozaki and Chuang, 1997), but without affecting basal calcium levels (Hiroi et al., 2005). Accordingly, lithium pretreatment reversed thapsigargin-induced downregulation of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 in PC12 cells, and its cytoprotective effects included upregulation of c-Fos and GRP78 and attenuation of thapsigargin-triggered intracellular calcium release. These beneficial effects were blocked, moreover, by curcumin (Hiroi et al., 2005), an AP-1 inhibitor. On the other hand, VPA pretreatment also upregulated this ER stress protein (Wang et al., 1999, 2001; Bown et al., 2000; Hiroi et al., 2005), and induced similar protective effects against ER stress in PC12 cells (Hiroi et al., 2005), as well as oxidative damage in primary cultured rat cerebrocortical cells (Wang et al., 2003). Because ER dysfunction has been linked to impaired synaptic plasticity and to the pathophysiology of diseases, such as BD (Hough et al., 1999; Hayashi et al., 2009), AD (Mattson et al., 2000), and cerebral ischemia (Mattson et al., 2000), the induction of GRP78 by lithium and VPA against ER stress may well be clinically relevant. In support of GRP78’s therapeutic relevance, it was recently implicated in protection against α-synuclein–induced neurotoxicity in a rodent model of Parkinson’s disease (Gorbatyuk et al., 2012) and cell death caused by mHtt aggregates in a cell culture model of HD (Jiang et al., 2012).

F. Augmented Protective Effects by Lithium and VPA Cotreatment

As mentioned previously, lithium and VPA have diverse neuroprotective mechanisms, ranging from the augmentation of neurotrophic factors (such as BDNF) to the facilitation of anti-apoptotic factors (such as Bcl-2) and the regulation of numerous survival-signaling cascades (such as enhancing the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway). These diverse signaling effects are primarily mediated by inhibition of GSK-3 and HDAC. In the following section, we examine how combination treatment provides enhanced beneficial effects in different model systems.

1. Enhanced Neuroprotection by Cotreatment.

As CGC neuronal cultures age, lithium loses its ability to enhance serine phosphorylation of GSK-3 and protect CGCs from glutamate-induced apoptosis. VPA also has little protective effect against glutamate-induced cell death in older CGCs. However, in the first study to demonstrate these drugs’ synergistic neuroprotective effects, Leng and colleagues showed that cotreatment with lithium and VPA completely blocked glutamate excitotoxicity in aging CGCs (Leng et al., 2008). Gene silencing with siRNA to GSK-3α or GSK-3β mimicked the ability of lithium to induce this synergistic neuroprotection when used in combination with VPA. Conversely, treatment with other class I and II HDAC inhibitors or transfection with an HDAC1 isoform-specific siRNA in conjunction with lithium treatment also enhanced neuroprotection.

The neuroprotective effects elicited in intact neurons cotreated with lithium and VPA, moreover, are closely associated with a potentiation in GSK-3 inhibition, as revealed by augmented phosphorylation of both GSK-3α and β, and attenuated phosphorylation of tau protein, a major GSK-3 substrate. In a cell-free system of CGC lysate, combined treatment also induced a more than additive decrease in GSK-3β enzymatic activity (Leng et al., 2008). These observations suggest that GSK-3 inhibition is a likely molecular target for this enhanced neuroprotection, despite the fact that the role of HDAC-regulated genes has yet to be investigated. It is also important to note that although combination treatment with lithium and VPA was no more effective than lithium alone in preventing relapse in patients with BD-I (The BALANCE investigators and collaborators, 2010), recent data from preclinical HD and ALS models indicate that this combined treatment may be useful for treating these disorders (see sections III.C and III.E).

2. Enhancing the Homing and Migratory Capacity of Stem Cells

Over the past 20 years, stem cell therapy has been investigated as a potential treatment of neurodegenerative diseases (reviewed in Goldman, 2005; Lunn et al., 2011). After transplantation of stem cells, directing migration and ensuring survival and integration are essential for successful development of these therapies for clinical use.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from bone marrow have been demonstrated to produce beneficial effects in diverse animal models of neurodegenerative diseases (Joyce et al., 2010). Although MSCs can reach an injured brain region and release trophic factors to hasten endogenous repair and regeneration, it is increasingly recognized that the poor homing and migratory abilities of transplanted MSCs limit their effectiveness as a treatment strategy (Karp and Leng Teo, 2009). Enhancing the homing and migratory capacity of transplanted MSCs could therefore be expected to improve their therapeutic efficacy.

MSC migration toward ischemic brain lesions is mediated by the interaction between stromal cell–derived factor 1α (SDF-1α), a molecule endowed with potent chemotactic activity, and its specific α-chemokine receptor CXC-chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) (Wang et al., 2008), in which expression in hematopoietic stem cells is enhanced by VPA (Gul et al., 2009). Because MSC migration is regulated by the Wnt signaling pathway in which activation inhibits GSK-3β (Neth et al., 2006), lithium’s ability to inhibit GSK-3β allows it to activate the Wnt downstream signaling pathway. For this reason, combined treatment with lithium and VPA additively enhanced MSC migration in vitro (Tsai et al., 2010).

Three-hour exposure of MSCs to 2.5 mM VPA markedly increased the mRNA and protein levels of CXCR4 (Tsai et al., 2010). This effect of VPA requires inhibition of HDACs and involves histone hyperacetylation at the CXCR4 gene promoter. VPA treatment also enhanced MSC migration mediated by SDF-1α, which was completely blocked by the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100. On the other hand, MSCs treated with 2.5 mM lithium for one day showed selective elevation of mRNA and protein levels and enzymatic activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), effects mimicked by the pharmacological inhibition or gene silencing of GSK-3β. Lithium treatment also potentiated MSC migration across the extracellular matrix, which was mediated by SDF-1α and suppressed by the MMP-9 inhibitors doxycycline and GM6001. Significantly, where AMD3100 and GM6001 were both present, the additive enhancement of MSC migration induced by VPA and lithium cotreatment was completely blocked. These findings suggest that the two drugs operate through distinct targets and mediators to stimulate MSC migration: VPA through HDAC-CXCR4 and lithium through GSK-3β-MMP-9 (Tsai et al., 2010). For a discussion of VPA and lithium cotreatment in a model of ischemic stroke, see section III.A.

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from the peripheral blood have been shown to transdifferentiate into neurons and glial cells in the brain (Mezey et al., 2000; Cogle et al., 2004; Sigurjonsson et al., 2005). Circulating HSCs are decreased in early AD, and this decrease is significantly correlated with age (Maler et al., 2006). Transplantation of HSCs has been shown to promote angiogenesis and enhance neuroplastic effects in the ischemic brain (Shyu et al., 2006). Although HSCs have the potential for wide clinical application, insufficient cell numbers have limited their use. Attempts are now being made to amplify these stem cells in an uncommitted state, while maintaining their differentiation potential. The combination of VPA and lithium treatment has been shown to delay hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) differentiation and to increase the potential for cell survival (Walasek et al., 2012). Specifically, VPA and lithium cotreatment preserved the immature cell phenotype of HSPCs in the hematopoietic differentiation-inducing culture and regulated transcription factor networks at the molecular level by preserving expression of stem cell–related genes and repressing genes involved in differentiation. These findings provide an ex vivo strategy to obtain sufficient autologous HSPCs before transplantation by using a combination of lithium and VPA. However, this study by Walasek et al. did not investigate whether this combination treatment would affect the transdifferentiating ability of HSPCs. Further investigation is warranted.

G. New Directions: miRNAs Targeted by Lithium and VPA

miRNAs are non–protein-coding RNAs of 21–24 nucleotides. Abundant in all multicellular organisms, they function in translational repression and mRNA degradation by binding either to the 3′−UTR of mRNAs (Lai, 2002) (predominantly) or to coding regions (Forman et al., 2008), where they have the potential to silence hundreds of genes. This mechanism allows miRNAs to modulate complex transcriptomic and proteomic networks and to play an important regulatory role in nervous system function. Brain-enriched miRNAs, for instance, have been reported to regulate spine development and synaptic plasticity (Schratt et al., 2006; Siegel et al., 2011).

The unique regulatory mechanisms used by miRNAs have also been used to elucidate transcriptional mechanisms used by mood stabilizers. In the rat hippocampus, in fact, chronic treatment with either lithium or VPA has been found to selectively modulate miRNAs (Zhou et al., 2009). It is particularly interesting to note that among those miRNAs regulated by mood stabilizers, three miRNAs (miR-24, -34a, -128) target six BD susceptibility genes: calpain 6, dipeptidyl-peptidase 10, estrogen-related receptor gamma, member A of family with sequence similarity 126, metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 (GRM7), and thyroid hormone receptor beta. Future studies are warranted to strengthen the association of these six BD susceptibility genes with both the pathophysiology of BD and their potential regulation via miRNA-mediated mechanisms. GRM7 regulation via miR-34a has been confirmed in vitro (Zhou et al., 2009). In vivo regulation of both miR-34a and GRM7 after long-term treatment with either lithium or VPA has also been reported (Zhou et al., 2009). Another study found that lithium regulates a select set of miRNAs in human lymphoblastoid cells (Zhou et al., 2009). Of interest, some of these lithium-responsive miRNAs (miR-34a and miR-221) were identified in both rats and humans, suggesting that the transition from preclinical to clinical research will prove to be fruitful. For instance, a recent preliminary study with a small sample size correlating plasma miR-134 levels in successfully medicated manic patients with BD (Rong et al., 2011) further suggests an additional role for miRNAs in psychiatry, where they may be effective biomarkers to predict lithium response. Moreover, miR-134 has recently been reported to be dysregulated in schizophrenia in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Santarelli et al., 2011). Clearly additional studies are warranted to substantiate miRNA’s potential as biomarkers, but these studies and others provide tantalizing hints in support of their exciting promise.

Additional support exists for miRNA mechanisms underlying the therapeutic actions of mood stabilizers. For instance, alterations in the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor system are thought to be associated with BD (Goodwin and Jamison, 2007). Muscarinic M1-receptor knockout mice exhibited mania-like behavioral deficits (e.g., hypersensitivity to amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion), and lithium treatment normalized these behavioral deficits in part by enhancing M1-receptor-ERK pathway signaling (Creson et al., 2011). This enhancement of M1 was attributable in part to down-regulation of a previously recognized lithium responsive miRNA (let-7b) (Zhou et al., 2009). Therefore, identifying the miRNA mechanisms that mood stabilizers use to achieve their therapeutic effects is likely to provide insight into another transcriptional layer of regulatory control that may identify numerous unrealized therapeutic targets.

In addition, miRNA dysregulation has been implicated in many different pathologic conditions, including neurodegenerative, neuropsychiatric, and neurologic diseases (Hebert and De Strooper, 2009; Eacker et al., 2009; Dinan, 2010; Kim et al., 2010; Moreau et al., 2011; Hunsberger et al., 2012). A very recent article reported miRNA regulation after ischemic stroke (e.g., miR-446f, miR-446h, miR-155, miR-1224, and miR-297a) and the potential for underlying the benefits of postinsult VPA treatment (e.g., miR-885-3p and miR-331) in a rat model of cerebral ischemia (Hunsberger et al., 2012). Collectively, this support suggests that miRNAs may underlie disease processes that contribute to numerous neurologic disorders. Furthermore, insight into the miRNA targets and pathways currently under investigation and the in silico analysis for predicted targets (Dweep et al., 2011) may provide critical knowledge for elucidating the complex signaling networks underlying fundamental disease processes. In addition, uncovering which miRNA binding sites in susceptibility genes are mutated in patients will help link miRNA mechanisms to genetic vulnerabilities and may help explain why some patients respond to treatment with mood stabilizers and others do not.

Because of the insights gleaned to date, miRNA research appears to hold great promise for the identification of currently unknown mechanisms of transcriptional regulation that contribute to the neurobiological effects of mood stabilizers and of dysregulated signaling networks that contribute to CNS disorders. Indeed, a recent article by Salmena and colleagues provides a unifying hypothesis detailing how mRNAs, transcribed noncoding pseudogenes, and long noncoding RNAs may communicate and interact using miRNA binding sites (Salmena et al., 2011). In accordance with this hypothesis, the presence of a noncoding pseudogene with miRNA response elements may compete for miRNAs and effectively switch from being a target to a sponge to dampen the effect of a particular miRNA. It has also been speculated that miRNAs in signaling networks act as key regulatory nodes (Inui et al., 2010). Theories such as these suggest that the ability to modulate key miRNAs could be used to repress disease pathology or activate the therapeutic mechanisms underlying mood stabilizers in a manner not currently achievable. A future challenge is how to integrate transcriptomic and proteomic data to evaluate how the myriad of regulatory controls (e.g., through miRNAs, epigenetics, and posttranslational modifications) contribute to therapeutic effects and to the dysregulation of brain processes associated with CNS disorders. Overcoming this challenge should provide unparalleled new insights into the complex mechanisms of pathophysiology and revolutionize current targets and methods of treatment of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases.

III. Repurposing Mood Stabilizers for CNS Disorders Beyond BD

Loosely defined, drug repurposing is using known drugs to treat conditions for which they are not currently intended. Lithium and VPA have a long history of safe use in the treatment of BD and, in the case of VPA, epilepsy. Because of their numerous beneficial effects, they could be readily repurposed to treat other CNS diseases. Indeed, the largest study of its kind to date recently reported that long-term lithium treatment augmented the neuronal viability marker NAA in prefrontal cortex of patients with BD in a two center study (Hajek et al., 2012). Decreased NAA expression measured by noninvasive proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy has been reported in both neurologic and neurodegenerative conditions, where it has been associated with loss of neurons and axons. Clinical studies are now warranted to investigate the long-term treatment effects of lithium and VPA in CNS disorders beyond BD, perhaps with use of a methodology similar to that use by Hajek et al. (2012). Tables 1 and 2 list preclinical studies supporting the neuroprotective actions of lithium and VPA, respectively, in various animal models of CNS diseases. Below, we summarize evidence from selected models that support the translation of these findings into highly anticipated and needed clinical benefits.

TABLE 1.

Beneficial effects of the mood stabilizer lithium in multiple models of CNS disorders

Preclinical studies supporting the repurposing of lithium as a modulator of neuroprotection in various animal models of CNS diseases.

Disease Experimental models References
Ischemic stroke Rat and mouse MCAO models; gerbil and rat global ischemia model; hippocampal organotypic cultures Nonaka and Chuang, 1998; Cimarosti et al., 2001; Ma and Zhang, 2003; Ren et al., 2003; Xu et al., 2003; Roh et al., 2005; Bian et al., 2007; Yan et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2008; Li et al., 2010a, 2011; Tsai et al., 2011;
Hemorrhagic stroke Rat intracerebral hemorrhagic model Kang et al., 2012
TBI Rat and mouse models of controlled cortical impact Shapira et al., 2007; Zhu et al., 2010; Dash et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2012a,b
HD Rat excitotoxic model; rat corticostriatal slices; transgenic mice; neuroblastoma cells Wei et al., 2001; Carmichael et al., 2002; Wood and Morton, 2003; Senatorov et al., 2004; Berger et al., 2005; Senatorov and Chuang, 2007; Sarkar et al., 2008; Crespo-Biel et al., 2009; Chiu et al., 2011
AD Cultured cells and hippocampal slices; rabbits and rats; transgenic mice; Drosophila Hong et al., 1997; Munoz-Montano et al., 1997; Alvarez et al., 1999, 2002; Inestrosa et al., 2000; Wei et al., 2000; Sang et al., 2001; Sun et al., 2002; De Ferrari et al., 2003; Ghribi et al., 2003; Perez et al., 2003; Phiel et al., 2003; Tsuji et al., 2003; Mudher et al., 2004; Rametti et al., 2004, 2008; Su et al., 2004; Nakashima et al., 2005; Noble et al., 2005; Scali et al., 2006; Rockenstein et al., 2007; Martin et al., 2009; Leroy et al., 2010; Sofola et al., 2010; Sy et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2011a
ALS Transgenic mice Shin et al., 2007; Feng et al., 2008; Fornai et al., 2008; Ferrucci et al., 2010; Fulceri et al., 2011;
FXS Transgenic Drosophila and mouse models McBride et al., 2005; Min et al., 2009; Choi et al., 2010; Mines et al., 2010; Mines and Jope, 2011; Liu et al., 2011, 2012b
PD Cellular, rat and mouse MPTP models; 6-hydroxydopamine models King et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2004; Youdim and Arraf, 2004; Koh et al., 2008; Duka et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2011; Arraf et al., 2012; Castro et al., 2012
Retinal degeneration Retinal ganglion cells in vivo and in vitro; retinal neurocytes in vitro Huang et al., 2003; Huang and Klein, 2006; Schuettauf et al., 2006; Cho and Chen, 2008; Zhuang et al., 2009
Multiple sclerosis Mouse experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis De Sarno et al., 2008
Spinal cord injury Adult rats Shimizu et al., 2000; Yick et al., 2004; Su et al., 2007; Dill et al., 2008
Alcohol-induced degeneration Cultured neurons; neural stem cells; infant mice and Drosophila Zhong et al., 2006; Chakraborty et al., 2008; Ishii et al., 2008; French and Heberlein, 2009; Liu et al., 2009; Luo, 2010; Saito et al., 2010
Down syndrome Transgenic mice Huang et al., 2000; Dou et al., 2005; Bianchi et al., 2010;
Spinocerebellar ataxia-1 Transgenic mice Watase et al., 2007
HIV-associated neurotoxicity Mouse model of encephalitis; cultured neurons Maggirwar et al., 1999; Everall et al., 2002;

TABLE 2.

Beneficial effects of the mood stabilizer VPA in multiple models of CNS disorders

Preclinical studies supporting the repurposing of VPA as a modulator of neuroprotection in various animal models of CNS diseases.

Disease Experimental models References
Ischemic stroke Rat and mouse MCAO models; rat global ischemia model Ren et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Qian et al., 2010; Tsai et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011a, 2012; Xuan et al., 2012
Hemorrhagic stroke Rat intracerebral hemorrhagic model Sinn et al., 2007
TBI Rat model of controlled cortical impact Dash et al., 2010
HD Transgenic mice Zadori et al., 2009; Chiu et al., 2011;
AD Cultured cells and hippocampal slices; transgenic mice; Drosophila Su et al., 2004; Qing et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2011
ALS Transgenic mice Sugai et al., 2004; Rouaux et al., 2007; Feng et al., 2008
FXS FXS lymphoblastoid cell lines Tabolacci et al., 2005, 2008
PD LPS-treated midbrain neuron-glia co-cultures; cellular, rat and mouse MPTP models; rotenone-challenged cellular and rat models Peng et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2006, 2007; Wu et al., 2008; Castro et al., 2012; Kidd and Schneider, 2010, 2011; Monti et al., 2010; Xiong et al., 2011
Retinal degeneration Rat retinal ganglion cells; rat retinal ischemia model; optic nerve crush; mice Biermann et al., 2010, 2011; Zhang et al., 2011b, 2012b
Spinal cord injury Adult rats and mice; organotypic culture of spinal cord Abematsu et al., 2010; Lv et al., 2011, 2012; Penas et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2012b
Spinal muscular atrophy SMA fibroblast cell lines; transgenic mice Sumner et al., 2003; Tsai et al., 2006, 2008; Harahap et al., 2012
HIV-associated neurotoxicity Mouse model of encephalitis; cultured neurons Dou et al., 2005

A. Stroke

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States and a major cause of serious long-term disability in adults. In addition, stroke victims are frequently burdened with vascular depression and dementia that is difficult to treat with conventional medicine. Of all strokes, 87% are ischemic and the rest are hemorrhagic (Roger et al., 2011). For acute ischemic stroke, thrombolysis with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) is the only treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to date. However, because of the narrow therapeutic window of less than 4.5 hours and risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, it is estimated that rtPA is used in only 1.8%–2.1% of patients with ischemic stroke (Barber et al., 2001; Kleindorfer et al., 2008).

Although there is clearly an urgent need to develop novel treatments for stroke, poststroke pathophysiology is complex and involves early- and late-phase processes (such as apoptosis, neuroinflammation, BBB breakdown, neurovascular repair, and neurovascular regeneration). Accumulating evidence demonstrates that lithium and VPA exert beneficial effects throughout this pathophysiological process (for a review, see Chuang et al., 2009, 2011; Wang et al., 2011b) and hold clinical potential for its treatment.

1. Lithium-Induced Effects in Experimental Stroke Models

a. Neuroprotection and behavioral improvement

The neuroprotective effects of lithium against cerebral ischemia were first demonstrated in a rat model of permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO) (Nonaka and Chuang, 1998). This pioneering study showed that long-term pretreatment with lithium at therapeutically relevant doses decreased scores indicative of neurologic deficit and volume of brain infarct. Chronic lithium pretreatment also reduced apoptotic death in the penumbra of the ischemic cortex in a transient MCAO (tMCAO) model (Xu et al., 2003). In addition to pretreatment, subcutaneous injection of therapeutic doses of lithium into tMCAO rats three hours after the onset of occlusion markedly decreased infarct volume and suppressed neurologic deficits, as measured by sensory, motor, and reflex tests (Ren et al., 2003). Lithium pretreatment in gerbils after global cerebral ischemia was also found to suppress most ischemia-induced changes in exploratory behavioral and memory impairments (Bian et al., 2007). These behavioral benefits in gerbils were associated with an increased number of viable cells and a decrease in apoptotic cells in the CA1 hippocampal ischemic area.

b. Anti-excitotoxic and anti-apoptotic effects

In a rat model of global cerebral ischemia, lithium was reported to inhibit ischemia-induced hyperactivation of the NMDA receptor by inhibiting phosphorylation of the NMDA subunit 2A tyrosine and its interactions with Src and Fyn through PSD-95 in the rat hippocampus (Ma and Zhang, 2003). In a tMCAO model, postischemic lithium treatment (presumably through GSK-3 inhibition) upregulated heat shock responses, including activation of HSF-1 and induction of HSP70 in the cortical penumbra (Ren et al., 2003). In addition, in organotypic cultures of rat hippocampus subjected to oxygen and glucose deprivation, lithium was neuroprotective in conjunction with HSP27 activation (Cimarosti et al., 2001). In the mouse brain, lithium also attenuated hypoxia-induced serine dephosphorylation of GSK-3α and β (Roh et al., 2005). These findings suggest that lithium protection against ischemia-induced injury involves multiple mechanisms, including GSK-3 inhibition. In addition to inducing anti-apoptotic HSP70, lithium-induced neuroprotection was also accompanied by downregulation of proapoptotic p53 in the CA1 but upregulation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 in the global ischemic brain of gerbils (Bian et al., 2007).

c. Anti-inflammation

It is now generally acknowledged that ischemia-induced brain injury results at least in part from neuroinflammation mediated by microglia, monocytes, or macrophages. To date, lithium’s anti-inflammatory effects have been demonstrated in rat models of neonatal hypoxia-ischemia and hemorrhagic stroke, but not in ischemic stroke. Under neonatal hypoxia-ischemia conditions, postinsult treatment with lithium suppressed microglial activation and attenuated overexpression of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (Li et al., 2011). Pretreatment of intracerebral hemorrhagic rats with lithium for three days suppressed the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and reactive microglia in the perihematomal regions (Kang et al., 2012), and this was associated with decreased cell death and improved sensorimotor recovery, underscoring lithium’s anti-inflammatory effects. Because GSK-3 inhibition is known to reduce neutrophil infiltration and decrease the expression of proinflammatory factors in a rat tMCAO model (Koh et al., 2008), inhibition of this kinase may also be involved in mediating lithium’s anti-inflammatory effects in the context of stroke.

d. Angiogenesis

One key component of poststroke neurovascular remodeling is angiogenesis, a process in which new capillaries are formed on existing blood vessels through directed proliferation and the migration of endothelial progenitor cells. Poststroke angiogenesis increases collateral circulation and restores blood flow to injured tissue. These new vessels also provide neurotrophic support for concurrent neurogenesis and synaptogenesis, ultimately leading to functional recovery (Beck and Plate, 2009). For these reasons, enhancing angiogenesis after stroke may hold great promise for the treatment. Neurovascular remodeling in the chronic phase of stroke determines the ultimate extent of recovery. A functional MRI study in tMCAO rats demonstrated the neurohemodynamic aspects of lithium-induced recovery from ischemia. In this study, a delayed lithium injection (12 hours after ischemic onset), followed by daily injections, significantly enhanced the ratios of mean activated volume and total activation of magnitude for both blood oxygen level dependence and functional cerebral blood volume on day 15 (Kim et al., 2008). Lithium elevated levels of CD31 staining, a marker of microvasculature, and functional cerebral blood volume in the peri-infarct regions, suggesting possible vascular transformation (Kim et al., 2008). An increase in MMP-9 staining and its colocalization with CD31 further suggest that neurovascular remodeling depends on MMP-9 in the recovering brain area. Treatment of rat brain endothelial cells with lithium was also found to increase protein levels of VEGF, apparently through the PI3K and GSK-3 signaling pathways (Guo et al., 2009). Because VEGF has been linked to angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and neuroprotection (Fan and Yang, 2007), VEGF overexpression may contribute to lithium’s ability to promote neurovascular remodeling and functional recovery after ischemic stroke.

e. Neurogenesis

Neurogenesis, which includes cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation, is the process of forming integrated neurons from progenitor cells (Kornack and Rakic, 2001). In the adult brain, neurogenesis usually occurs in the subventricular zone (SVZ) and hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG). The neural stem cells in the SVZ migrate into the olfactory bulb and then differentiate into interneurons, and new neurons in the subgranular zone migrate into the adjacent DG granule cell layer. It is known that cerebral ischemia enhances neurogenesis in regions that are traditionally neurogenic and nonneurogenic, perhaps as part of the self-repair system of ischemic injury (Arvidsson et al., 2002). In a rat model of transient global ischemia with four-vessel occlusion, chronic lithium treatment improved spatial learning and memory deficits and increased the survival and generation of newborn cells in the DG, thereby potentiating hippocampal neurogenesis (Yan et al., 2007). It has been suggested that postischemic neurogenesis involves growth factor–induced activation of receptor tyrosine kinases and subsequent stimulation of PI3K/Akt and ERK signaling pathways (Shioda et al., 2009). Consistently, lithium treatment enhanced ERK phosphorylation after ischemia, whereas the ERK inhibitor U0126 abolished the effects of lithium on neurogenesis and behavioral improvement (Yan et al., 2007).

f. Effects on MSC migration after transplantation

Lithium- or VPA-primed MSCs transplanted by tail vein injection into tMCAO rats 24 hours after ischemic onset significantly increased the number of MSCs homing to brain infarct regions, such as the cortex and striatum, as measured two weeks after transplantation (Tsai et al., 2011). For a more detailed discussion of how priming with lithium and/or VPA affects MSC migration, see section II.F. MCAO rats receiving lithium- and/or VPA-primed MSCs exhibited improved functional recovery, reduced infarct volume, and enhanced angiogenesis in the penumbra regions. Of note, MSCs that have been coprimed with lithium and VPA showed further improvement in homing ability, angiogenesis, and functional recovery after transplantation into ischemic rats. Of significance, pharmacological inhibition of MMP-9 reversed these beneficial effects of lithium priming, and inhibition of CXCR4 reversed the benefits of VPA priming, suggesting that the mechanisms underlying these benefits likely involve lithium-induced MMP-9 upregulation and VPA-induced CXCR4 overexpression. These findings indicate a potential for enhancing MSC migration and homing capacity after transplantation into stroke victims by priming them with GSK-3 and HDAC inhibitors.

2. VPA-Induced Effects in Experimental Stroke Models

a. Neuroprotective effects and behavioral benefits

VPA’s protective effects against brain ischemic injury are well established. Initial studies using tMCAO found that subcutaneous injection with VPA (300 mg/kg) immediately after the onset of tMCAO, followed by twice-daily injections thereafter, markedly decreased infarct size, suppressed ischemia-induced apoptosis, and reduced neurologic deficits (Ren et al., 2004). VPA treatment in MCAO rats increased histone H3 acetylation and HSP70 upregulation in both ipsilateral and contralateral brain hemispheres, suggesting the involvement of HDAC inhibition and HSP70 induction in mediating VPA-induced neuroprotection. Postinsult treatment with VPA or other HDAC inhibitors (such as SB or TSA) within at least three hours of ischemic onset in a rat pMCAO model also significantly decreased infarct volume and induced long-term improvement in neurologic performance (Kim et al., 2007). Of note, it has been recently shown that treatment with 100 mg/kg VPA for seven days starting 24 hours after pMCAO in rats significantly improved neurologic performance of foot fault test, adhesive test, and neurologic severity score measured 7–28 days after ischemia, although this treatment did not reduce infarct volume (Liu et al., 2012a). These findings suggest that the beneficial effects of VPA on neurologic outcomes may be independent of the infarct volume reduction.

b. Anti-inflammation

In a rat pMCAO model, VPA treatment markedly reduced the number of both activated microglia and infiltrating monocytes/macrophages and suppressed ischemia-induced upregulation of proinflammatory factors, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and COX-2 (Kim et al., 2007). The anti-inflammatory effects of VPA have also been demonstrated in vitro. In rat midbrain neuron-glia cocultures, for example, the neuroprotection of VPA against LPS-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity was, at least in part, found to be attributable to a decrease in levels of proinflammatory factors released from activated microglia (Peng et al., 2005). Specifically, pretreating cocultures with VPA markedly reduced LPS-induced increases in the release of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), nitric oxide, and intracellular ROS. These anti-inflammatory effects correlate with a decrease in the number of microglia. Treatment of rat microglia-enriched cultures with VPA induced microglial death with multiple hallmarks of apoptosis (Chen et al., 2007). VPA-induced microglial apoptosis was also accompanied by disrupted mitochondrial membrane potential and hyperacetylation of histone H3—effects mimicked by treatment with other HDAC inhibitors. This HDAC inhibition-dependent microglial apoptosis induced by VPA provides a novel mechanism of protection against neuroinflammation.

Experiments with animal models of brain ischemia have further shown that HDAC inhibitors other than VPA (such as vorinostat, SB, and TSA) also super-induced HSP70 (Ren et al., 2004; Faraco et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2007). In a mouse tMCAO model, HSP70 overexpression inactivated the key inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB and prevented nuclear translocation of activated NF-κB subunits (Zheng et al., 2008). In addition, postinsult VPA treatment in a rat model of intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke was found to reduce the number of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL)-positive cells, upregulate Bcl-2/Bcl-xl, downregulate Bax, and inhibit caspase activity (Sinn et al., 2007). VPA further mitigated cerebral inflammation by inhibiting neutrophil infiltration, suppressing microglial activation, and downregulating proinflammatory factors. Thus, suppression of neuroinflammation and apoptosis appears to be mediated by HDAC inhibition and comprises multiple mechanisms that contribute to the neuroprotective effects induced by VPA. Accordingly, VPA-induced inhibition of HDACs has been shown to suppress microglial activation, reduce levels of proinflammatory factors, and induce HSP70—anti-inflammatory effects that may mediate neuroprotection against hippocampal neuronal loss and cognitive deficits in rat models of transient global ischemia (Xuan et al., 2012).

c. BBB protection

Disruption of the BBB is critical to the pathogenesis of brain ischemia and other neurologic disorders, allowing intravascular proteins and fluid to penetrate into the cerebral parenchymal extracellular space, followed by leukocyte infiltration, vasogenic edema, and hemorrhage. One study found that postinsult treatment with VPA (200 and 300 mg/kg i.p.) robustly attenuated tMCAO-induced BBB disruption and brain edema (Wang et al., 2011a). Of note, VPA-induced BBB protection was dose-dependent and persisted for at least 72 hours after transient ischemia.

The BBB can be disrupted by abnormal activity of MMPs, a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases known to perform multiphasic roles in ischemic stroke (Rosell and Lo, 2008). The abnormal upregulation of both MMP-2 and -9 induced by ischemia, for instance, is linked to BBB disruption by degrading tight junctions and basal lamina proteins and disrupting cell-matrix homeostasis. VPA strongly reduced MCAO-induced MMP-9 activity and protein elevation and concomitantly restored protein levels of tight junctions, claudin-5 and ZO-1, which are degraded 24 hours after MCAO (Wang et al., 2011a). MMP-9 expression has been shown to be regulated by NF-κB (Van den Steen et al., 2002), in which activation may be inhibited by VPA through upregulation of HSP70, as mentioned above. Consistent with this notion, treatment with VPA or SB completely blocked MCAO-induced nuclear translocation of the NF-κB p65 subunit (Wang et al., 2011a). Taken together, the evidence suggests that VPA’s ability to protect the BBB likely involves the initial inhibition of HDACs, followed by suppression of MCAO-induced NF-κB activation, MMP-9 overexpression, and tight junction degradation.

d. Angiogenesis

As measured on day 14 after tMCAO, long-term postinsult administration of VPA (200 mg/kg i.p.) markedly reduced infarct volume and improved functional recovery (Wang et al., 2012). Concurrently, VPA treatment enhanced postischemic angiogenesis by increasing microvessel density, facilitating endothelial cell proliferation and upregulating regional cerebral blood flow in the ipsilateral cortex. In addition, ischemia is followed by an increase in levels of three key proangiogenic factors: VEGF, MMP-2, and MMP-9. These molecules are regulated by HIF-1, a transcription factor responsible for gene transcription that facilitates adaptation and survival after hypoxia or ischemia (Ke and Costa, 2006). As measured on days 7 and 14 after MCAO, VPA treatment was shown to potentiate MCAO-induced HIF-1α accumulation and to upregulate downstream levels of VEGF and MMP-2/9 activity in the ipsilateral cortex. Inhibition of HIF-1α, moreover, reversed the elevated postischemic angiogenesis and functional recovery induced by VPA.

Taken together, these findings indicate that long-term VPA treatment enhances postischemic angiogenesis and promotes long-term functional recovery in an experimental model of ischemic stroke. The findings are further supported by reports from an in vitro study that the HDAC inhibitors VPA and vorinostat enhanced VEGF-induced spheroid sprout formation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells and that VPA displayed a trend toward increasing endothelial cell migration (Jin et al., 2011). Of note, VPA appeared to play a dual role in preserving postischemic endothelial cell function: it limited cell damage by inhibiting MMP-9 and VEGF in the acute phase but enhanced angiogenesis by upregulating VEGF and MMP-2/9 in the later recovery phase (Wang et al., 2012). To date, little is known about the mechanisms underlying this time-dependent switch in VPA-induced activity after MCAO. Further investigation is certainly warranted.

e. Neurogenesis

When studied in vitro and in vivo, VPA has been shown to promote hippocampal neurogenesis (Hsieh et al., 2004; Yu et al., 2009). In addition, even under conditions of favored lineage-specific differentiation, VPA was also found to inhibit the differentiation of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes (Hsieh et al., 2004). In fact, VPA-induced inhibition of HDAC has been shown to upregulate several regulatory factors favoring neurogenic transcription (such as NeuroD, Ngn1, Math1, and p15). Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis further showed that, in neuronal differentiation of both hippocampal neural progenitor cells and adult hippocampal neurogenesis, acetylated histone H4 was associated with the promoter of Ngn1 (Yu et al., 2009). In a rat pMCAO model, delayed VPA treatment promoted white matter repair by increasing survival of oligodendrocytes and differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells and enhanced neurogenesis by increasing the number of newly formed neuroblasts in the ischemic boundary zone 28 days after ischemia (Liu et al., 2012a). In addition, VPA increased acetylated histone H4 levels in neuroblasts and neural progenitor cells, suggesting the involvement of HDAC inhibition in VPA’s proneurogenic effects. The HDAC inhibitors SB and TSA, which are structurally similar and dissimilar to VPA, respectively, were also found to exert postischemic proneurogenic effects in a rat pMCAO model (Kim et al., 2009). In addition, postinsult treatment with SB of rats undergoing pMCAO was shown to stimulate BrdU incorporation in the SVZ, DG, striatum, and frontal cortex; post-MCAO treatment with SB or TSA was also shown to increase the population of cells expressing nestin, GFAP, CREB, BDNF, and polysialic acid-neural cell adhesion molecule (PSA-NCAM), a neuroblast marker with important neurobiological functions. After treatment with HDAC inhibitors, moreover, extensive colocalization of BrdU and PSA-NCAM was noted in multiple brain regions. BDNF and phospho-CREB, which are known to regulate neurogenesis, were robustly upregulated by treatment with SB or TSA. It is noteworthy that intraventricular injection of the TrkB antagonist K252a markedly suppressed SB-induced cell proliferation detected by BrdU and Ki67 in the ipsilateral SVZ, DG, and other brain regions. It also blocked nestin expression and CREB activation and attenuated the long-lasting behavioral benefits of SB. Together, these results suggest that proliferation, migration, and differentiation induced by HDAC inhibition require BDNF-TrkB signaling, which therefore, contributes to long-term behavioral improvement after stroke.

Overall, these findings highlight the ability of lithium and VPA to improve functional outcomes, suppress cell death, attenuate neuroinflammation, enhance migration of transplanted MSCs, and promote angiogenesis and neurogenesis in diverse animal models of cerebral ischemia. Figure 2 is a proposed model of how these two mood stabilizers induce multiple neurobiological effects in the MCAO ischemic model. These beneficial effects further confirm the considerable therapeutic potential of these mood-stabilizing drugs in the treatment of certain conditions of human stroke. Nevertheless, caution is warranted because of the limited therapeutic window of both lithium and VPA dosing, because adverse effects arise rapidly at toxic doses. These adverse effects can significantly negate the beneficial outcomes of long-term treatment. Therefore, appropriate dosing for both of these drugs is essential for their therapeutic potential to be realized, particularly because effective dosing for stroke and other neurodegenerative diseases is currently lacking. We anticipate that combining treatment of lithium and VPA may also provide unique advantages toward reducing harmful adverse effects by requiring lower doses for clinical benefit.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A proposed model to demonstrate the molecular actions of lithium and VPA in preclinical models of cerebral ischemia. By inhibiting GSK-3 and HDACs, respectively, lithium and VPA induce transcriptional activation of diverse neuroprotective and neurotrophic genes in the ischemic brain. HSP70 expression is enhanced by mechanisms involving lithium-induced HSF-1 activation and VPA-induced Sp1 activation by acetylation. HSP70 is neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory, presumably because it inhibits NF-κB, in which activity is inhibited by VPA and, possibly, by lithium. NF-κB inhibition also contributes to protection against BBB breakdown by downregulating MMP-9 shortly after ischemia. VEGF and MMP-9 are induced by long-term lithium or VPA treatment and are key protein molecules involved in potentiating angiogenesis. In addition, BDNF is transcriptionally activated by lithium and VPA, and BDNF-TrkB signaling is essential for enhancing neurogenesis. BDNF and VEGF also contribute to neuroprotection and the behavioral benefits of mood stabilizers. Furthermore, ischemia-induced NMDA receptor overstimulation and calcium overflow in the ischemic brain are inhibited by lithium treatment through inhibition of NR2 subunit tyrosine phosphorylation. This could suppress excitotoxicity-induced p38 and Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and subsequent activator protein 1 (AP-1) activation to block neuronal apoptosis. Lines with solid arrows represent stimulatory connections; lines with flattened ends represent inhibitory connections. Dashed lines represent pathways with reduced activity as a result of lithium or VPA treatment.

B. TBI

TBI is characterized by initial injury to neurons, glia, and vascular structures, followed by secondary injury from excitotoxicity, BBB breakdown, brain edema, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration. Secondary injury is often accompanied by behavioral and cognitive deficits and neuropsychiatric disturbances (such as depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder) (for a review, see Ursano et al., 2010). Since 2001, more than 200,000 military personnel in the United States have sustained TBI, which is increasingly considered to be a signature wound of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In addition, in developed countries, TBI is one of the leading causes of mortality and disability among young persons, and its incidence is rapidly increasing. Moreover, despite extensive research aimed at developing therapies for TBI, no FDA-approved drug yet exists for its treatment. Because of TBI’s complex pathology, any effective therapy will need drugs that can act on multiple cell survival and death pathways, either alone or in combination (Margulies et al., 2009); in this regard, accumulating evidence indicates that lithium and VPA are both strong candidates.

1. Lithium-Induced Effects on Neurodegeneration, Neuroinflammation, Behavioral Improvement, and Aβ Accumulation in Models of TBI

In cases of mild TBI in mice, pretreatment with lithium (or another GSK-3 inhibitor) 30 minutes before injury alleviated depressive behavior 24 hours after mild TBI (Shapira et al., 2007). In the hippocampus, mild TBI increased phosphorylation of Akt, phosphorylation of GSK-3β at Ser9, and accumulation of downstream β-catenin, suggesting the activation of this prosurvival cascade. The evidence thus suggests that inhibiting GSK-3β may be beneficial in TBI. In a mouse model of moderate TBI produced by controlled cortical impact, a method widely used for the accurate control of mechanical input, chronic lithium pretreatment for 14 days attenuated the loss of hemispheric tissue, brain edema, IL-1β expression, and hippocampal neuronal degeneration. In addition, these effects of lithium pretreatment in moderate TBI mice were associated with improved spatial learning and memory (Zhu et al., 2010).

Postinsult treatment with lithium also exerts robust neuroprotective effects in TBI. With a therapeutic window of 3–6 hours after injury, lithium treatment was recently reported to reduce controlled cortical impact–induced lesion volume in a TBI mouse model, when assessed at three days and three weeks after injury (Yu et al., 2012a). This postinsult lithium treatment attenuated TBI-induced neuronal death, microglial activation, COX-2 induction, and MMP-9 expression and preserved the integrity of the BBB, in addition to normalizing TBI-induced hyperlocomotor activity, anxiety-like behavior, and motor coordination. Under these experimental conditions, lithium also robustly increased GSK-3β phosphorylation at Ser9, suggesting that inhibition of this kinase is involved in mediating the drug’s beneficial effects. In another study, controlled cortical impact–induced TBI was also found to cause a delayed increase in GSK-3β Ser9 phosphorylation. In contrast, postinsult (30 minutes after injury) lithium administration for five days was associated with elevated phosphorylation of this kinase and subsequent β-catenin accumulation with reduced hippocampal CA3 neuron loss and with lower deficits in hippocampus-dependent learning and memory, as measured at 14–28 days after injury (Dash et al., 2011). That lithium’s behavioral benefits are partially mimicked by the GSK-3 selective inhibitor SB-216763 supports the theory that lithium’s protective effects against TBI involve GSK-3 inhibition. Of note, however, lithium treatment may well have other targets that contribute to its beneficial effects.

Of note, TBI has been identified as a major risk factor for developing AD. Memory impairments are frequent in both patients with TBI and animal models (Spikman et al., 2012), and Aβ levels were found to be elevated in CSF and postmortem brain samples from patient with TBI (Uryu et al., 2007). Hyperactivity of GSK-3 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of AD (Hooper et al., 2008), an idea supported by the fact that lithium treatment produces many benefits in various models of this disease (see section III.D). In recent findings from our laboratory, lithium treatment in the corpus callosum and hippocampus robustly reduced a number of molecules and processes induced by TBI, including Aβ load, amyloid precursor protein (APP), tau hyperphosphorylation, and overexpression of β-APP–cleaving enzyme-1 (Yu et al., 2012b). Of importance, lithium also ameliorated TBI-induced deficits in spatial learning and memory, as assessed by the Morris water-maze and Y-maze tests; these effects were associated with increased hippocampal preservation. Together, these findings demonstrate multiple beneficial effects of lithium in TBI and underscore the continued need for its clinical investigation.

2. VPA-Induced Effects on Neurodegeneration, Neuroinflammation, and Functional Recovery in Models of TBI

Although less is known about the therapeutic potential of VPA in TBI, preclinical animal studies have similarly revealed beneficial effects. In a rat model of TBI, postinjury systemic VPA administration reduced cortical contusion volume, decreased BBB permeability, and, of most importance, improved motor function and spatial memory (Dash et al., 2010). VPA also dose-dependently increased histone acetylation and reduced GSK-3 activity in the hippocampus. Similar results were observed in a previous study from the same group using another HDAC inhibitor, SB, in combination with behavioral training (Dash et al., 2009). In addition, HDAC inhibition also reduced TBI-induced microglial inflammatory response in rats (Zhang et al., 2008). In a mouse model of closed head injury, a single dose of the HDAC inhibitor ITF2357 given 24 hours after injury significantly increased levels of acetylated histone H3, HSP70, and phosphorylated Akt (Shein et al., 2009). Other benefits included reduced neurologic deficits, attenuated neuronal degeneration, and reduced lesion volume. These results confirm the hypothesis that VPA’s effects are mediated through HDAC inhibition and that VPA merits further investigation as a potential treatment of TBI.

3. Clinical Trials of VPA Treatment in TBI

In a two-year randomized double-blind trial, VPA treatment began within 24 hours after injury and lasted for one or six months. VPA substantially reduced the rate of early seizure, although this benefit was not significant, compared with short-term (one week) treatment with phenytoin; neither drug prevented late seizures (Temkin et al., 1999). In addition, no significant adverse or beneficial effects were associated with VPA in another clinical study, as assessed by a battery of neuropsychological measurements administered 1, 6, and 12 months after TBI (Dikmen et al., 2000). On the basis of this trial, it was suggested that VPA should not be used for prophylaxis of posttraumatic seizures. Although VPA showed no benefit over phenytoin, it is possible that treatment could be optimized by shortening the treatment time window, controlling the dropout rate, and including a placebo group. Because these two clinical trials were conducted over a decade ago and evidence is accumulating for VPA’s robust benefits in preclinical TBI models, there is a need to re-examine the clinical effects of VPA and other HDAC inhibitors in patients with TBI. A recent study showed that VPA treatment caused an acute ischemic stroke in a patient with a mutation of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (Varoglu, 2009). Mutation of this enzyme results in a decrease in its activity and induces hyperhomocysteinemia, a possible risk factor for epilepsy and occlusive vascular disease. The use of VPA could exacerbate hyperhomocysteinemia by reducing folic acid and vitamin B12 levels. Therefore, genetic examination or the determination of plasma levels of homocysteine may prevent these risks associated with VPA treatment.

C. HD

HD is a devastating inherited neurodegenerative disease. It is estimated by the World Health Organization (WHO) that HD affects 180,000 Americans, 30,000 of whom currently have the disease and 150,000 of whom have a 50% chance of developing it. A member of the polyglutamine (polyQ) family of disorders, HD is caused by a trinucleotide CAG-repeat in the gene that encodes a polyQ stretch to an unnaturally high number (≥35) of glutamines in the N terminus of the disease-causing huntingtin (Htt) protein (Macdonald, 1993). This abnormally expanded mutant Htt (mHtt) causes neurotoxicity, possibly through both a toxic gain of function and a loss of wild-type Htt protein (Zuccato et al., 2001). The presence of mHtt ultimately results in the selective loss of neurons in the brain that particularly affects medium-sized spiny neurons in the striatum and, to a lesser extent, neurons in the cortex (Friedlander, 2003; Hickey and Chesselet, 2003). Clinically, patients with HD experience various cognitive, psychiatric, and physical symptoms, such as memory loss, changes in personality, emotional deterioration, and uncontrollable jerky movements. HD is lethal, with death occurring ∼15 years after the initial symptoms (Martin and Gusella, 1986; Vonsattel and DiFiglia, 1998; Ross and Tabrizi, 2011). No cure for HD presently exists, nor are there effective treatments to halt disease progression. The search for neuroprotective agents to combat this dreaded disease is therefore of critical importance.

1. Lithium-Induced Effects on Apoptosis, Cell Proliferation, and Neuroprotection in Excitotoxic Models of HD

Both preclinical and clinical studies have implicated excitotoxicity, a mechanism of neuronal death caused by supersensitivity to (or hyperactivation of) excitatory amino acid receptors, in the neuropathology of HD (Taylor-Robinson et al., 1996; Levine et al., 1999; Zeron et al., 2001, 2002). The development of an excitotoxic animal model of HD was based on the fact that intrastriatal injection with kainic or quinolinic acid (QA), both glutamate receptor agonists, mimicked the loss of medium-sized spiny neurons and produced many of the neuroanatomical changes found in the brain of patients with HD (Coyle and Schwarcz, 1976; Schwarcz and Whetsell, 1982; Foster et al., 1983; Beal et al., 1986). QA is also endogenously produced, among other toxic substances, by activated microglia and macrophages. Infusion of this compound into the striatum has been reported to downregulate cytoprotective Bcl-2 and upregulate proapoptotic p53 and c-Myc (Liang et al., 2005). Furthermore, it has been hypothesized that QA-induced striatal neuronal apoptosis may be the result, at least in part, of a failed cell cycle attempt (Liang et al., 2007). Administration of the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NP) also mimics striatal HD pathology (Brouillet et al., 1999). The excitotoxic features of HD suggest that lithium and VPA could be useful for its treatment.

Initial research in the rat excitotoxic model of HD found that lithium pretreatment, at doses within the therapeutic range, markedly reduced the size of QA-induced striatal lesions and the loss of striatal medium-sized neurons (Senatorov et al., 2004). Lithium’s protective effects correlated with upregulation of Bcl-2, downregulation of Bax, and suppression of caspase-3 activation. In addition, the ability of lithium to protect against QA-induced excitotoxicity was further confirmed in mature rat corticostriatal organotypic cultures (Senatorov and Chuang, 2007). This preparation has the advantages of both in vivo and in vitro approaches, because it preserves organotypic organization and interneuronal connections. Lithium pretreatment stimulated the proliferation of striatal cells near the site of QA-induced injuries, and some of these replicating cells had the phenotype of neurons or astroglia (Senatorov et al., 2004). These observations were corroborated by reports that lithium increased neurogenesis in the rat hippocampus in vivo (Chen et al., 2000). In rat cortical neuronal cultures, lithium stimulated the proliferation of neuroblasts and antagonized glutamate or corticosterone-induced loss of neuroblast proliferation (Hashimoto et al., 2003b). These studies demonstrate lithium’s anti-apoptotic, cell-proliferating, and neuroprotective effects in different models of HD.

2. Investigating Mood Stabilizers in Transgenic Models of HD

HD pathogenesis is frequently modeled through the transgenic expression of mHtt, which causes aggregate formation and toxicity in cell models and in vivo (Carmichael et al., 2002). In the brains of N171-82Q and YAC128 transgenic mouse models of HD, GSK-3 and HDAC hyperactivity has been associated with the onset of behavioral symptoms of the disease (Chiu et al., 2011). As discussed above, GSK-3 dysfunction has been implicated in many neuropsychiatric disorders, and activation of this kinase has been linked to apoptotic cell death induced by multiple insults. In a neuroblastoma cellular model of HD, the protective effects of lithium in reducing mHtt aggregates and cell death were mimicked either by treatment with a GSK-3β inhibitor or overexpression of a dominant-negative GSK-3β mutant (Carmichael et al., 2002). In Drosophila, lithium-induced protection against the toxicity of aggregate-prone proteins was mimicked by AR-A014418, a GSK-3β inhibitor (Berger et al., 2005). HDACs, on the other hand, play a key role in the homeostasis of histone acetylation of chromatin and regulation of transcription. Imbalances in protein acetylation and transcription are associated with a wide variety of brain disorders, as discussed above. In HD, moreover, mHtt has been shown to affect diverse transcriptional regulatory pathways (Cha, 2007). Transcriptional dysregulation is in fact an early and progressive event in HD and is an important causative factor in the disease (Sugars and Rubinsztein, 2003; Hodges et al., 2006).

Wild-type Htt has been shown to activate transcription of the BDNF gene (Zuccato et al., 2001), whereas mHtt represses it (Zuccato et al., 2003, 2007); of note, BDNF is a neurotrophin essential for striatal neuron survival (Nakao et al., 1995; Ventimiglia et al., 1995). BDNF plays a central role in cortical development and synaptic plasticity. Accordingly, in HD, loss of this trophic support from the cortex is considered to be one of the causal factors of striatal death, and decreased BDNF has been reported both in animal models of HD (Duan et al., 2003, 2008) and in the striatum of patients with HD (Ferrer et al., 2000; Zuccato et al., 2001). In contrast, enhanced BDNF expression has been shown to protect neurons from neurochemical insults associated with HD, both in cultured cells (Saudou et al., 1998) and in rodents (Bemelmans et al., 1999; Canals et al., 2004; Kells et al., 2004). Emerging evidence indicates that treatment with lithium and VPA affects both transcriptional activity and gene expression. Long-term treatment with either of these two drugs increased BDNF expression in the rat brain (Fukumoto et al., 2001). As reported above, moreover, both lithium inhibition of GSK-3β and VPA inhibition of HDACs activate BDNF promoter IV in cortical neurons (Yasuda et al., 2009). In various in vitro and in vivo models of HD, however, treatment with lithium or VPA has had mixed results in protecting against mHtt toxicity (Wei et al., 2001; Carmichael et al., 2002; Wood and Morton, 2003; Zadori et al., 2009).

3. Effects of Mood Stabilizers on Clearance of mHtt

Abnormal proteolytic processing of mHtt is believed to be another critical step in the onset of HD. This cleavage of mHtt in human HD tissue was found to be partially mediated by calpain, a calcium-activated neutral protease in which activity is elevated in the caudate of human HD tissues (Gafni and Ellerby, 2002). In both cultured primary brain neurons and a rat 3-NP model of HD, pretreatment with lithium attenuated 3-NP–induced cellular death and striatal neurodegeneration by preventing calpain and subsequent activation of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) (Crespo-Biel et al., 2009). Eliminating mHtt expression, moreover, not only halted symptom progression but also led to a regression of disease-like symptoms (Yamamoto et al., 2000). These results suggest that improved clearance of the mutant protein can prevent cellular dysfunction and neurodegeneration in HD.

As described in section II.E, the UPS and autophagy are two major intracellular mechanisms for the clearance of abnormal protein accumulation. These mechanism are therefore believed to be particularly beneficial in those neurodegenerative disorders (such as HD) characterized by the accumulation of misfolded, disease-causing proteins (Luo and Le, 2010; Hegde and Upadhya, 2011; Li and Li, 2011; Nijholt et al., 2011). Because both lithium and VPA induce autophagy independent of mTOR activation, lithium in combination with rapamycin has been proposed as a rational HD therapy and has been tested in various models of the disease (Sarkar et al., 2008). This autophagy-inducing property has also been hypothesized to contribute to lithium’s protective effects in ALS (Fornai et al., 2008).

In HD models, overexpression of HSPs, molecular chaperones that promote the degradation of abnormally folded proteins, has been shown to reduce the formation of Htt aggregates and to suppress the neurodegeneration and toxicity associated with this disease (Chan et al., 2000; Jana et al., 2000; Fujimoto et al., 2005). The brains of HD animal models, however, show a decrease in HSP70 and its cochaperone HSP40 (Hay et al., 2004; Chiang et al., 2007; Duan et al., 2008; Yamanaka et al., 2008), which have been found to colocalize with Htt aggregates (Jana et al., 2000). Of significance, in cultured neurons and rats subjected to cerebral ischemia, after treatment with either lithium or VPA, expression of HSP70 was found to increase (Ren et al., 2003, 2004; Kim et al., 2007; Marinova et al., 2009, 2011).

4. Effects of Combined Lithium and VPA Treatment on Behavior in Transgenic Models of HD

The most frequently studied transgenic mouse model of HD is the R6/2, which carries a 145 CAG repeat expansion and shows behavioral motor deficits as early as 5–6 weeks of age. In this model, postsymptomatic lithium treatment significantly improved rotarod performance but had no overall effect on survival (Wood and Morton, 2003). However, because cotreatment with lithium and VPA synergistically protected cultured brain neurons from glutamate excitotoxicity (Leng et al., 2008), combination therapy is expected to provide additional benefits in neurodegenerative conditions. Figure 3 shows a hypothetical working model of the molecular actions of combined lithium and VPA treatment in preclinical models of HD.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

A hypothetical working model to demonstrate molecular actions of combined lithium and VPA treatment in preclinical models of HD. In HD, the expression of mHtt affects a diverse set of transcriptional regulatory pathways and produces aggregates and toxicity in the striatal neurons. Transcriptional dysregulation, an early and progressive event in HD, is an important causative factor in this disease. Combined lithium and VPA treatment, by more consistently inhibiting both GSK-3 and HDACs, disinhibits several transcription factors, and subsequently elevates the expression of cytoprotective proteins, such as BDNF, HSP70, and Bcl-2. Suppressed GSK-3 activity further reduces the activity of the proapoptotic protein p53 and its negative regulatory effect on Bcl-2. Superinduction of HSP70 together with upregulated Bcl-2 and downregulated p53 attenuate apoptosis. As a molecular chaperone, HSP70 can also facilitate degradation of misfolded proteins via the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). On the other hand, by decreasing inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) levels, lithium and VPA induce autophagy, a key physiologic process for the bulk degradation of cytoplasmic proteins that has recently been recognized as one of the important regulators of neuronal survival and function. Induction of these intracellular protein quality control mechanisms enhances the clearance of mHtt and, thus, reduces mHtt-induced transcriptional dysregulation and toxicity. Moreover, increased expression of BDNF, an important neurotrophic support for striatal neurons, further protects against neurochemical insults associated with HD and promotes neurogenesis. These neuroprotective effects after lithium and VPA coadministration contribute to behavioral improvement and prolong the lifespan of transgenic HD mice. Lines with solid arrows represent stimulatory connections; lines with flattened ends represent inhibitory connections. Dashed lines represent pathways with reduced activity as a result of combined treatment.

The therapeutic potential of combined treatment with lithium and VPA was recently assessed (Chiu et al., 2011) in two transgenic mouse models of HD with distinct genetic backgrounds and disease progressions: N171-82Q and YAC128 (Schilling et al., 1999; Slow et al., 2003). Although neither additive nor synergistic in every aspect of this disease, combined lithium and VPA treatment produced overall reliable behavioral benefits in both models. This combined treatment alleviated impaired locomotion and depressive-like behaviors more strongly than treatment with either drug alone. Combination therapy was also more successful than single-drug therapy at improving motor skill learning and coordination in N171-82Q mice and at suppressing anxiety-like behaviors in YAC128 mice.

In addition to motor and cognitive impairments, patients with HD frequently experience psychiatric disturbances, such as anxiety and depression (Di Maio et al., 1993), that severely reduce their daily functioning and quality of life (Hamilton et al., 2003; Wheelock et al., 2003). In the brains of HD mice treated with lithium and VPA together, the activity of GSK-3β and HDACs was consistently decreased, and expression of BDNF and HSP70 was rapidly elevated and sustained (Chiu et al., 2011). Because BDNF is considered a key mediator of the clinical efficacy of antidepressants and anxiolytic drugs (Woo and Lu, 2006), these actions have particular relevance for the drugs’ behavioral effects. Perhaps of more importance, in N171-82Q mice, cotreatment markedly prolonged survival. Taken together, the data suggest that combined lithium and VPA treatment could be even more effective against HD if administered early in the course of the disease (Chiu et al., 2011). Potential patients with HD can be identified by genetic testing before the onset of symptoms; thus, these data provide a strong rationale for using a combination of lithium and VPA to treat HD.

5. Clinical Trials of Lithium and VPA Treatment in HD

Before their neuroprotective properties were discovered, the clinical use of lithium or VPA in patients with HD was explored decades ago. In patients with HD, lithium strikingly reduced chorea and markedly improved voluntary movements (Anden et al., 1973) and motor function (Mattsson, 1973). One study found that patients in the early stages of the disease were more likely to benefit from lithium treatment (Foerster and Regli, 1977); in that study, lithium conferred beneficial mood- and temper-stabilizing effects. Combined therapy with lithium and neuroleptics has also proven to be beneficial in several patients with HD (Anden et al., 1973; Manyam and Bravo-Fernandez, 1973; Leonard et al., 1974, 1975; Schenk and Leijnse-Ybema, 1974). On the other hand, VPA has been suggested as a rational choice as a neuroleptic therapy in HD treatment (Tremolizzo et al., 2007). A case study showed that VPA dose-dependently improved myoclonic hyperkinesia in eight patients with HD (Saft et al., 2006). When given in combination with olanzapine, VPA at the lowest effective dose (60–80 μg/ml in plasma) also appeared to be beneficial for relieving both psychosis and movement symptoms in patients with HD (Grove et al., 2000).

Other reports showed that lithium had no beneficial effects in patients with HD (Aminoff and Marshall, 1974; Vestergaard et al., 1977). In some instances, lithium treatment, particularly when used as the sole therapeutic agent, even worsened motor and cognitive performance (Carman et al., 1974; Leonard et al., 1974). VPA has also been reported to have no beneficial effects (Symington et al., 1978) or to lead to a state of tolerance (Tan et al., 1976) on involuntary movements in patients with HD. In these ancient trials reporting no effect, however, the patient samples were small and the duration of drug treatment was short. Large-scale new clinical trials with long treatment duration are necessary to resolve these discrepancies and assess the potential benefits of using mood-stabilizing drugs to treat HD. Lithium and VPA are already FDA-approved medications with a long history of safe use in humans, and in light of results from recent promising preclinical studies, combined treatment with lithium and VPA or other neuroprotective drugs is recommended for future clinical investigation. Because the symptoms of this disease are devastating and worsen progressively without remission until death, the potential effects on behaviors may significantly improve quality of life for individuals with HD and their caregivers.

D. AD

In 2011, AD affected an estimated 5.4 million Americans and was the sixth leading cause of death. Clinically, it is characterized by progressive memory loss, personality changes, and ultimately, dementia. There is essentially no treatment available to arrest or reverse the deterioration of neurons in AD, although the FDA has approved five drugs that can temporarily slow disease progression (Tariot et al., 2011). The pathogenesis of AD is not well understood; however, the accumulation of Aβ in the brain is believed to be the primary cause (Hardy and Selkoe, 2002). This neuropathological hallmark of AD presumably results from an imbalance between Aβ production and clearance. The hyperphosphorylation of tau, a microtubule-binding protein (Selkoe, 2001), has also been implicated in the early development of neurofibrillary pathology (tauopathies) associated with AD and other neurodegenerative diseases (Lee et al., 2001; Planel et al., 2001).

Therefore, in the treatment of AD, Aβ accumulation and tau hyperphosphorylation are the primary treatment targets. It is well-established that GSK-3 acts as an Aβ production regulator (Phiel et al., 2003; Su et al., 2004; Rockenstein et al., 2007) and a tau kinase (Hanger et al., 1992; Lovestone et al., 1994; Brownlees et al., 1997). Because abnormal increases in GSK-3 levels and activity are associated with pathogenesis and neuronal death in the brain of individuals with AD (Munoz-Montano et al., 1999; Bhat et al., 2004), the mood stabilizers lithium and VPA, which have been shown to inhibit GSK-3, could have potential therapeutic use in treating this disorder.

1. Effects of Mood Stabilizers on GSK-3 Inhibition in AD Models

Aβ peptide is derived from APP by sequential secretase-dependent proteolytic processing. Through GSK-3 inhibition, chronic treatment with lithium or VPA has been reported to block Aβ production. For example, chronic lithium treatment was found to block Aβ accumulation in the brains of mice overproducing APP (Phiel et al., 2003), presumably by interfering with the reaction of γ-secretase. As discussed in section III.B.1, lithium could also decrease Aβ burden by inhibiting APP processing through BACE-1 inhibition in the brain of TBI mice (Yu et al., 2012b). Although this effect of lithium in vitro was mimicked by transfection with siRNA of GSK-3α but not GSK-3β (Phiel et al., 2003), other in vitro and in vivo studies found that GSK-3β inhibition also mimicked the ability of lithium or VPA to suppress the process of Aβ formation from APP (Su et al., 2002, 2004; Qing et al., 2008). A recent study in an adult-onset Drosophila model of AD demonstrated a novel mechanism, whereby GSK-3 directly regulated Aβ42 levels in the absence of any effects on APP processing (Sofola et al., 2010).

By inhibiting GSK-3, moreover, lithium has been demonstrated, both in vivo and in vitro, to reduce tau phosphorylation (Hong et al., 1997; Munoz-Montano et al., 1997; Sang et al., 2001). In transgenic mouse models of AD, chronic lithium treatment decreased mutant tau protein aggregation (Perez et al., 2003) and arrested the development of neurofibrillary tangles (Leroy et al., 2010). In mouse models of tauopathies, chronic lithium treatment not only inhibited tau phosphorylation and neuronal degeneration mediated by GSK-3 (Noble et al., 2005), but also promoted ubiquitination, thereby decreasing tau-induced lesions (Nakashima et al., 2005). In addition to GSK-3, tau phosphorylation was also regulated by PP2A (Tanaka et al., 1998). It has been reported that the activity of PP2A is reduced in the brain of individuals with AD (Trojanowski and Lee, 1995). PP2A inhibition prevented tau dephosphorylation, a process that precedes and is required for tau cleavage and degradation (Rametti et al., 2004). In cultured cortical neurons, lithium was found to down-regulate tau transcription (Rametti et al., 2008). In the rat brain, lithium treatment not only increased PP2A activity (Tsuji et al., 2003), but also decreased tau phosphorylation, which in turn, facilitated tau destruction (Rametti et al., 2004). Finally, the fact that blockade of PP2A activity in cultured neurons reversed lithium-induced down-regulation of total tau proteins mediated by GSK-3β inhibition (Martin et al., 2009) suggests that PP2A is involved in lithium’s action.

2. Effects of Mood Stabilizers on Other Molecular Targets in AD Models

In addition to inhibiting GSK-3, lithium and VPA have other protective effects relevant to the pathogenesis of AD. In hippocampal slices, lithium treatment prevents acetylcholinesterase-promoted Aβ toxicity and associated loss of function of Wnt signaling components (Inestrosa et al., 2000). By rescuing β-catenin levels in rat brains, long-term lithium treatment was found to be neuroprotective against Aβ-induced hippocampal neurodegeneration (De Ferrari et al., 2003). It was also found that induction of Dickkopf protein 1 (DKK1), a Wnt pathway inhibitor (Krupnik et al., 1999), was associated with neurodegeneration in the brains of individuals with AD (Caricasole et al., 2004). Researchers demonstrated that, in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus, systemic administration of lithium reversed local infusion of DKK1-induced neuronal cell death and astrocytosis (Scali et al., 2006). Lithium has further been shown to protect against Aβ-induced ER stress and the subsequent activation of caspases and NF-κB in the hippocampus of rabbits (Ghribi et al., 2003). This effect presumably comes from the induction of the chaperone protein GRP78 (Hiroi et al., 2005), as discussed in section II.E.2.

VPA, on the other hand, has been shown to enhance microglial phagocytosis of Aβ in vitro (Smith et al., 2010). In human astrocytes, moreover, VPA (but not lithium) has been shown to act as a potent inducer of clusterin expression and secretion (Nuutinen et al., 2010). Clusterin is a small, HSP-like molecular chaperone, in which secretion is induced by stress. Expression of clusterin is increased in AD (May et al., 1990); it is present in neuritic plaques and binds to and enhances the clearance of Aβ in the brain (Nuutinen et al., 2009). VPA’s ability to induce clusterin expression and secretion is therefore a distinct protective mechanism. Chronic lithium treatment also largely suppressed exogenous Aβ-induced downregulation of Bcl-2 and neuronal death in vitro (Hong et al., 1997; Alvarez et al., 1999, 2002; Wei et al., 2000). Of note, Bcl-2 protein levels in the brains of a mouse model of AD were inversely correlated with miR-34a expression (Guan et al., 2009), a miRNA that has recently emerged as a common target for lithium and VPA (Zhou et al., 2009). These findings suggest that miRNA regulation may be a novel mechanism for the protective effects of these mood stabilizers in AD.

3. Effects of Mood Stabilizers on Recovery of Cognitive Function in AD Models

In Drosophila models of tauopathies, lithium is known to reverse axonal transport and locomotor deficits by inhibiting GSK-3β (Mudher et al., 2004). In normal healthy rats, long-term lithium treatment improved learning and memory (Nocjar et al., 2007), and it ameliorated spatial learning deficits in rats injected with preformed Aβ fibrils (De Ferrari et al., 2003). By inhibiting GSK-3β signaling, lithium treatment of 3 months also reduced Aβ burden and tau hyperphosphorylation, prevented neurodegeneration in the cortex and hippocampus, and normalized memory deficits in transgenic mice overexpressing human APP (Rockenstein et al., 2007).

Because dysregulation of histone acetylation is also implicated in the memory impairment and pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases, using HDAC inhibitors to control the elevation of histone acetylation could be another novel approach for the treatment of memory deficits in AD. HDAC2 is known to negatively regulate memory formation and synaptic plasticity (Guan et al., 2009), and its expression has been found to be increased in experimental AD models and patients (Graff et al., 2012). In a mouse model of neurodegeneration, shRNA-induced knockdown of HDAC2 restored structural and synaptic plasticity and abolished memory impairments (Graff et al., 2012). In transgenic AD mice, relatively low doses of the HDAC inhibitor VPA significantly reduced the formation of neuritic plaques and improved memory deficits (Qing et al., 2008). In animal models of this disease, moreover, injections of other HDAC inhibitors (such as SB, phenylbutyrate, or vorinostat) completely restored contextual memory (Kilgore et al., 2010; Ricobaraza et al., 2012). A recent study using SB in AD mice indicated, in fact, that HDAC inhibitors may be therapeutically beneficial even when administered at an advanced stage of the disease (Govindarajan et al., 2011). In contrast, another preclinical animal study showed that, although administering a low dose of VPA (30 mg/kg) at a later stage could affect neuropathological changes, cognitive deficits could only be reduced by early intervention; this effect was attributed to GSK-3 inhibition (Qing et al., 2008). The role of HDAC inhibition in this low-dose VPA-induced effect requires further investigation.

4. Clinical Trials of Lithium and VPA Treatment in AD

The use of lithium and VPA in the treatment of AD has already been investigated clinically. Studies of individuals with BD found that patients with a history of lithium treatment had significantly better cognition and memory scores than did patients receiving other treatments (Terao et al., 2006). Long-term lithium treatment was also found to reduce the prevalence of AD in older patients with BD (Nunes et al., 2007). A 10-year Danish study reported that patients receiving continued lithium treatment had a reduced rate of dementia, compared with those who received only one prescription of lithium, and this rate was equal to that in the general population (Kessing et al., 2008); it should be noted, however, that the study did not specify the indication for the lithium prespcription. In addition, a recent study showed that long-term treatment (12 months) with lithium (0.25−0.5 mM) decreased phospho-tau levels in CSF and improved cognitive performance on the AD Assessment Scale (Forlenza et al., 2011). Moreover, lithium tolerability was excellent, with a 91% adherence rate. In contrast, a trial in which 33 patients with AD received 10 weeks of lithium treatment reported no effect on GSK-3 activity or cognitive performance (Hampel et al., 2009), and other studies with small samples and short duration have similarly reported no therapeutic effect of lithium treatment in patients with AD (Brinkman et al., 1984; Macdonald et al., 2008).

As with lithium, VPA clinical trials conducted on patients with AD have produced mixed results. A recent case study suggested that low-dose divalproex may reduce the risk of adverse effects and led to behavioral improvement in patients with AD with agitation (Dolder and McKinsey, 2010). A 10-week safety and tolerability study with a sample of 20 outpatients with probable AD revealed that the maximum tolerated dosage of divalproex sodium was <1000 mg/day, whereas the most common adverse effects were sleepiness and tiredness (Profenno et al., 2005). In patients with mild to moderate AD, divalproex treatment (10–12 mg/kg/day) did not delay the emergence of agitation and cognitive impairment and, more alarmingly, was found to accelerate brain volume loss with significant toxic effects (Tariot et al., 2011). VPA treatment was also found to be ineffective for the management of agitation and aggression in older patients with moderate to severe AD (Herrmann et al., 2007). Of note, most of these reports used fixed doses and had few data on VPA’s effects on the pathogenesis or neuropathology of AD. Taken together, these preliminary results suggest that studies with longer treatment phases and larger groups of patient with AD are needed to observe the potential benefits of lithium. With regard to potential improvement of pathologic and cognitive impairments, VPA treatment should be administered with flexible dosing and in the early stages of AD.

E. ALS

ALS is an adult-onset neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive loss of motor neurons in the motor cortex and spinal cord, resulting in generalized weakness, muscle atrophy, paralysis, and death within five years after disease onset (Rowland, 1994). Damage to surrounding glial cells, muscle cells, interneurons, and Renshaw inhibitory neurons have also been reported, in addition to the loss of motor neurons (Boillee et al., 2006; Dobrowolny et al., 2008; Fornai et al., 2008). Most ALS cases occur sporadically, with no family history of the disease (Boillee et al., 2006; Wijesekera and Leigh, 2009). Sporadic and autosomal-dominant familial forms of ALS are, however, clinically similar. Approximately 20% of familial ALS is attributed to gain-of-function mutations in the gene encoding Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), a key antioxidant enzyme (Rosen et al., 1993; Andersen and Al-Chalabi, 2011). Mice expressing mutant Cu/Zn SOD1 exhibit ALS-like phenotypes, including premature death, behavioral abnormalities, and the formation of intracellular aggregates of SOD1 in the brain and spinal cord.

1. Effects of Lithium Treatment in ALS

Lithium’s neuroprotective mechanisms have been suggested as a possible treatment of ALS, particularly because upregulation of GSK-3β, hyperphosphorylation of β-catenin (Yang et al., 2008) and downregulation of VEGF and its receptors (Brockington et al., 2006) have all been identified in postmortem tissue samples from patients with ALS. As described above, lithium treatment increased the expression of VEGF, a growth factor that has been shown to prolong survival in ALS mice (Wang et al., 2007), and to protect motor neurons against excitotoxicity (Tolosa et al., 2008). In organotypic slice cultures of spinal cord, long-term treatment with lithium dose-dependently inhibited the GSK-3β signaling pathway and, thereby, prevented excitotoxic cell death of motor neurons (Caldero et al., 2010). Treatment with lithium alone or in conjunction with an antioxidant also improved motor function and slowed disease progression in a mouse model of ALS (Shin et al., 2007; Fornai et al., 2008; Ferrucci et al., 2010). Because defective autophagy has been found in diseased motor neurons (Venkatachalam et al., 2008), the autophagy-inducing properties of lithium are also believed to contribute to its protective effects in ALS (Fornai et al., 2008; Fulceri et al., 2011). However, one recent study in a female mouse ALS model found that lithium had no beneficial or neuroprotective effects (Pizzasegola et al., 2009). Although differences in sex and the genetic background of the mice cannot be excluded, the remarkably low serum steady-state lithium level (0.05–0.07 mM) found in these female mice from the latter study may account for this discrepancy.

2. Effects of VPA Treatment in ALS

Alteration in the gene that encodes the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein is responsible for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) (Lefebvre et al., 1995). This gene is present as two homologous copies in the human genome: the telomeric SMN1 and the centromeric SMN2. Homozygous deletion or point mutation of SMN1 causes SMA, whereas differential copy numbers of SMN2 modulate the phenotype of this disease (Rochette et al., 1997; Gavrilov et al., 1998). Of interest, abnormal copy numbers of SMN1 (single and triple) have been implicated as a risk factor in sporadic ALS (Corcia et al., 2002, 2006, 2009; Blauw et al., 2012).

Although the roles of SMN2 were reported to be inconclusive (Veldink et al., 2001; Blauw et al., 2012; Corcia et al., 2012), genetic studies suggest that SMN expression helps to modify disease severity in both SOD1 mouse models (Kunst et al., 2000) and patients with sporadic ALS (Veldink et al., 2001). Lower SMN2 copy numbers and lower SMN protein levels were found to be associated with an increased susceptibility to and severity of ALS (Turner et al., 2009; Veldink et al., 2005). In SMA fibroblast cultures, VPA administration activated SMN2 transcription, modulated the expression of splicing factors (Harahap et al., 2012), and increased the expression of SMN protein (Sumner et al., 2003). The upregulated level of SMN protein has also been shown to depend on the number of SMN2 copies (Brichta et al., 2003). Although further exploration is required, these results suggest that VPA may have therapeutic potential in the treatment of ALS.

In ALS mice, CREB-binding protein, a transcriptional coactivator with histone acetyltransferase activity, was specifically reduced in motor neurons of the lumbar spinal cord. Consistently, decreased histone acetylation levels were observed in degenerating motor neurons (Rouaux et al., 2003). Numerous studies have reported the beneficial effects of HDAC inhibitors on different aspects of neurodegeneration (Guo et al., 2009). Although results are inconsistent in ALS mice, treatment with VPA maintained histone acetylation in the spinal cord, restored CREB-binding protein levels in motor neurons, and slowed the degeneration of motor neurons (Rouaux et al., 2007; Crochemore et al., 2009). Although treatment with VPA was found to protect motor neurons against glutamate toxicity in an organotypic culture of spinal cord and, in one study, prolonged lifespan in a G93A mouse model of ALS (Sugai et al., 2004), another study using the same mouse model found that long-term dietary VPA administration protected motor neurons but did not significantly affect lifespan (Crochemore et al., 2009).

3. Clinical Trials of Lithium and VPA Treatment in ALS

Although results from the aforementioned preclinical studies raise the possibility that lithium and VPA have putative utility for the treatment of ALS, clinical trials of these mood stabilizers have, to date, provided controversial results. A 15-month pilot clinical trial in randomized patients with ALS found that, when compared with matched control patients treated with riluzole alone, cotreatment with riluzole and lithium markedly reduced mortality (Fornai et al., 2008). However, another randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial found that this combined treatment did not slow the progression of sporadic ALS more than riluzole plus placebo (Aggarwal et al., 2010). In a sibling-matched, sex-balanced, investigator-blinded trial, long-term lithium treatment was found to be ineffective on any treatment measure (Gill et al., 2009). Three of the latest trials also refute any beneficial effect of lithium treatment in patients with ALS (Chio et al., 2010; Miller et al., 2011; Verstraete et al., 2012), and a randomized sequential trial using a fixed dose of VPA found it to be equally ineffective in patients with ALS (Piepers et al., 2009).

Because of these disappointing results, future independent and competitive trials may not be conducted (de Carvalho and Pinto, 2011). Nevertheless, preclinical studies in ALS mice suggest that combined treatment with lithium and VPA produces a greater and more consistent effect in delaying the onset of disease symptoms, decreasing neurologic deficit scores and prolonging lifespan, compared with monotherapy with either drug (Feng et al., 2008). As with HD, this preclinical evidence encourages future clinical trials using this combined treatment, which may lead to potential additive or synergistic protective effects that may also reduce the required dosages of both drugs, thereby minimizing their adverse effects. We suggest that future trials be conducted with a larger number of subjects early in the disease course, longer duration of treatment, and various doses of drug to clarify treatment discrepancies and the efficacy of these mood stabilizers in ALS.

F. FXS

FXS is caused by a full mutation of the fragile X mental retardation-1 (FMR1) gene with an abnormal expansion of more than 200 CGG repeats within the gene promoter (Verkerk et al., 1991). This expansion triggers hypermethylation of cytosines in the CpGs of the gene and hypoacetylation of associated histones, resulting in transcriptional silencing of FMR1 (Verkerk et al., 1991; Sutcliffe et al., 1992; Hornstra et al., 1993). This gene encodes the fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), an RNA-binding protein that negatively regulates translation at synapses (Garber et al., 2006).

FXS is the most common inherited single-gene disorder associated with mental retardation. Patients with FXS exhibit cognitive impairments, seizures, hyperactivity, and autistic behaviors. Another significant problem for many affected young individuals is symptomatic attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Baumgardner et al., 1995). The discovery of this autism-related gene led to the development of FMRP knockout animals, which not only serve as animal models of FXS but have also improved our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of autism (Hagerman et al., 2005). No cure presently exists for FXS; current medical treatments are focused on behavioral improvement.

1. Therapeutic Potential of Lithium Treatment in FXS

It has been suggested that the absence of FMRP in the brain of individuals with FXS enhances the activation of the metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR), which results in long-term depression (Bear et al., 2004; Dolen et al., 2007). If so, the use of mGluR antagonists may prove to be effective for treating this disorder. In a Drosophila model of FXS that measured naive and conditioned courtship behaviors after treatment, mGluR antagonists were found to rescue both behavioral and cognitive deficits (McBride et al., 2005). Lithium treatment, which modulates signaling in a manner similar to mGluR antagonists, also increased naive courtship and restored short-term memory in FXS flies (McBride et al., 2005). A later study further found that treatment with mGluR antagonists or lithium effectively prevented age-related cognitive impairments in this Drosophila model of FXS (Choi et al., 2010).

In the brain of FXS mice, the inhibitory serine-phosphorylation of GSK-3 was found to be impaired (Min et al., 2009, 2010). Although levels of this GSK-3 phosphorylation can be increased by 2-methyl-6-phenylethynyl-pyridine (MPEP), an mGluR5 antagonist (Min et al., 2009; Mines et al., 2010), the combination of an mGluR5 antagonist with a GSK-3 inhibitor did not produce additive therapeutic effects in FXS mice (Min et al., 2009). These findings suggest that GSK-3 is the fundamental component of FXS pathology and indicate that GSK-3 is a potential therapeutic target. In fact, recent studies using mouse models of FXS demonstrated that lithium, a potent GSK-3 inhibitor, may be therapeutically useful for treating the disease (Mines and Jope, 2011). These studies showed that, in FXS mouse models, lithium treatment not only corrected hypophosphorylation of GSK-3 but also ameliorated aberrant dendritic spine morphology, deficient social interactions, and impaired learning ability (Min et al., 2009, 2010; Liu et al., 2011). In addition, the increased rate of cerebral protein synthesis observed in FXS mice, presumably a consequence of FMRP deficiency, was also significantly reversed by long-term lithium treatment (Liu et al., 2012b). Consistent with preclinical findings, lithium treatment in a pilot clinical study showed positive effects on behavior, adaptive skills, and cognitive measures in 15 FXS patients aged 6–23 years (Berry-Kravis et al., 2008).

2. Therapeutic Potential of VPA Treatment in FXS

Increasing histone acetylation has been identified as an epigenetic alteration to facilitate gene transcription. In cells from normal individuals, FMR1 was associated with acetylated histone H3 and H4, whereas in the cells of patients with FXS, reduced acetylation was observed (Coffee et al., 1999). Because the loss of transcriptional activity of FMR1 appears to be the major cause of FXS, pharmacological reactivation of this gene may serve as a possible therapeutic approach. As both a mood stabilizer and HDAC inhibitor, VPA may have dual beneficial effects in FXS: ameliorating behavior and reactivating FMR1.

Treatment of Fragile X cells with 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine, a DNA demethylating agent, resulted in reassociation of acetylated histone H3 and H4 with FMR1 promoter and transcriptional reactivation (Tabolacci et al., 2005). In addition, a clinical study found that treatment with L-acetylcarnitine, which regulates FMR1 activity (possibly via increased histone acetylation; Tabolacci et al., 2005), effectively ameliorated the symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children with FXS (Torrioli et al., 2008). VPA alone was found to produce only modest reactivation of FMR1 in different FXS lymphoblastoid cell lines (Tabolacci et al., 2008) and had no effect on DNA demethylation. Of note, the effect of VPA on reactivation of the FMR1 gene in other types of tissue may be varied and still remains unclear. In addition, VPA has already been proven to be an effective treatment of behavioral and psychiatric symptoms in patients with autism or FXS (Sovner, 1989; Hagerman et al., 1999; Torrioli et al., 2010). For these reasons, using VPA to treat FXS cannot be excluded, although further research on its basic mechanisms is needed.

IV. Limitations for Lithium and VPA Treatment

As the aforementioned evidence suggests, lithium and VPA have tremendous potential for the treatment of a variety of CNS and neurodegenerative disorders. Nevertheless, their use is associated with numerous concerns relating to toxicity, teratogenicity, dosing, patient age, comorbidites, and patient stability, and these must be addressed.

The toxicity of lithium was recently and systematically reviewed by McKnight and colleagues (2012). This review examined 385 studies (from the 1950s to the present) and included 33 studies examining renal function, 77 studies examining thyroid function, 60 studies examining parathyroid function, 24 studies examining hair, 77 studies examining skin, 55 studies examining weight, and 62 studies examining teratogenicity (McKnight et al., 2012). The main conclusions drawn from this comprehensive meta-analysis were that lithium increased the risk of polyuria, hypothyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, and weight gain; of surprise, little clinical support was found for the notion that lithium significantly impaired renal function in most patients (0.53% in patients treated with lithium, compared with 0.2% in the general population). The review also concluded that the risk of teratogenicity in infants exposed to lithium was not significantly different when compared with control subjects; however, there is still some uncertainty of risk to women who wish to become pregnant, suggesting that patients, in conjunction with their doctors, must balance these risks between harm to the infant and maternal mental health before continuing or discontinuing lithium treatment.

The review also noted that acute lithium toxicity (doses above 1.2 mM) did occur, particularly in patients made susceptible after surgery, renal failure, heart failure, or even severe illness resulting in diarrhea and vomiting. Therefore, to avoid lithium toxicity, monitoring serum lithium levels every three months is recommended, along with daily dosing rather than multiple daily dosing (Malhi and Tanious, 2011). Among the potential limitations of this exhaustive review are as follows: 1) lack of many long-term randomized or controlled cohort studies, 2) relatively small sample sizes, 3) lithium doses considered to be mainly in therapeutic range (0.4–1.0 mM) rather than at concentrations of toxicity (above 1.2 mM), 4) incomplete dosing information reported, 5) exclusion of patients with a history of lithium toxicity or sparse information to monitor these individuals and evaluate their clinical response to lithium treatment, and 6) tendency for a high dropout rate in important cohort studies, with little information regarding the cause of removal from the study. Even with these limitations, the authors provide an extensive systematic quantification of the potential risks associated with lithium treatment.

For current recommendations on optimal plasma lithium levels (0.4–1.0 mM) in treating BD and the risks associated with lithium treatment, the interested reader is referred to a practical guide (Malhi et al., 2011). These authors developed a lithiumeter, a visual scale for optimal lithium plasma levels for the treatment of BD. Future investigations may develop this scale further to assess optimal lithium plasma levels in combination therapies with VPA and also for dosing considerations based on factors, such as patients’ comorbidities, age, and sex. Although a careful study showing efficacy, tolerability, and safety of lithium in older patients with BD is currently unavailable, a recent review reported that lithium use in late-life BD was not only effective in treating manic and depressive symptoms, it also provided the benefit of reducing cognitive impairment and suicide rates (D'Souza et al., 2011). However, caution is warranted when monitoring dosing in older patients, because lithium plasma and brain levels do not correlate in older patients in the same manner as in younger patients (Forester et al., 2009). Moreover, higher brain lithium levels were found to correlate with both frontal lobe dysfunction and increased depressive symptoms in older adults with BD.

VPA toxicity was also recently reviewed (Chateauvieux et al., 2010). Adverse effects after treatment included weight gain (Grosso et al., 2009; Wirrell, 2003), decreased reproductive potential (Isojarvi, 2008; Verrotti et al., 2011), and a three-fold increase in birth defects (spina bifida, anencephaly, cardiac defects, dysmorphic features, valproate syndrome, and craniofacial, skeletal, or limb defects) (Clayton-Smith and Donnai, 1995; Genton et al., 2006; Ornoy, 2009). In a recent review surveying drug treatments for mood disorders during pregnancy, it was reported that the use of VPA, in addition to chlorimipramine, paroxetine, and atypical antipsychotics, should be avoided (Gentile, 2011); in contrast, lithium was associated with no significant teratogenic risks, making it potentially appropriate for treating pregnant patients (Gentile, 2012).

Additional adverse effects from VPA treatment include decreasing IQ in children after fetal exposure (Bromley et al., 2009; Meador et al., 2009) and some neurologic adverse effects (inducing ischemic stroke and exacerbating epilepsy) (Buechler and Buchhalter, 2007; Varoglu, 2009). The studies correlating VPA treatment with neurologic adverse effects were case reports and require additional randomized and controlled studies to substantiate these potential risks in a larger sample size. There have also been reports of hepatotoxicity and hematopoietic damage (thrombocytopenia, platelet dysfunction, factor XIII deficiency, hypofibrinogenemia, and vitamin K-dependent factor deficiency) after VPA treatment (Koenig et al., 2006; McFarland et al., 2008). Of interest, lithium was suggested to be used in treating hematopoietic deficits via increasing colony-stimulating factor (reviewed in Focosi et al., 2009). VPA was also reported to increase prevalence of von Wilbrant disease (Serdaroglu et al., 2002; Koenig et al., 2008), a coagulation abnormality presenting with increased bleeding tendency in the form of easy bruising, nosebleeds, and bleeding gums, and a nine-fold increase in aplastic anemia (Handoko et al., 2006), a condition in which a patient has lower red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets because of bone marrow not producing sufficient new cells. Clearly, precautions are warranted with both lithium and VPA treatments, and the risks must be weighed against the benefits.

A final consideration of the limitations on these two drugs to develop them into successful clinical treatments beyond BD is the lack of financial incentive for unpatentable drugs. This is based on problems with the current patent-based drug development process. Currently, market demand and novelty are rewarded over the reduction in global disease burden. A revised disease burden incentive system would reward actual performance of a new drug based on reducing the number of patients with a specific disease or improving quality of life (Barton and Emanuel, 2005). Without imposing monetary incentives to favor such a prize-based system that focuses on the social value of health benefits to inspire drug innovation (Gandjour and Chernyak, 2011), developing these unpatentable therapies will prove to be difficult where large-scale randomized trials are required to determine efficacy and tolerability.

V. Conclusions and Future Directions

The past decade has seen remarkable growth in our understanding of the mechanisms of action of lithium and VPA. In vitro studies have revealed that both of these mood-stabilizing drugs have robust neuroprotective effects against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity and a number of other insults in experimental settings. In diverse preclinical animal models of CNS disorders (including stroke, HD, AD, ALS, and others), lithium and VPA have also been shown to improve behavioral and cognitive performance, suppress neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation, enhance neurogenesis and angiogenesis, and prolong cell survival. When considering these drugs’ therapeutic potential, it is advisable to address common mechanisms that may underlie these benefits and thwart disease pathology.

Characterizing the unifying mechanisms that are common to different diseases will provide clear targets for facilitating beneficial effects across diverse CNS disorders. This review focused on GSK-3 and HDAC, two primary targets of lithium and VPA, respectively, in which dysregulation has been implicated in diverse neuropathological conditions. Although both drugs induce neuroprotective and neurotrophic effects, they use different molecular signaling pathways to regulate transcriptional activation of cell survival signaling cascades, oxidative stress pathways, protein quality control mechanisms, and numerous other beneficial effects. In promoting cell survival, lithium and VPA appear to affect many different downstream molecules (such as the neurotrophins BDNF and GDNF and angiogenic VEGF) and anti-apoptotic proteins (such as HSP70, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xl). In promoting cellular plasticity and resiliency, lithium and VPA affect similar downstream molecules, such as BDNF and Bcl-2; however, the associated changes in physiologic function are different from that of promoting cell survival mechanisms. These differences may provide critical distinctions between impaired cellular plasticity and different phases of neurodegeneration and cell death when treating diverse CNS indications.

Further investigation is clearly warranted to establish the core cellular and molecular disturbances that characterize the degree of impaired cellular plasticity and neurodegeneration and ultimately determine the associated changes in physiologic function (e.g., presymptomatic, early, and late symptoms) that lead to disease. This type of careful characterization will allow for personalized treatments to be timed for specific disease stages to slow or halt the progression from impaired cellular resilience to a breakdown in the maintenance of cellular integrity. In addition to timing treatment, combing the use of effective and specific risk biomarkers (genetic, molecular, cellular, and neuroimaging based) may prove to be helpful for paving the way for personalize medicine by targeting at-risk individuals before symptoms arise. Additional considerations may include targeting specific cell types and CNS regions. Keeping in mind these numerous considerations and the limitations associated with both agents, long-term clinical trials on a large scale are now warranted to repurpose lithium and VPA for therapeutic use in diverse new indications, ranging from stroke to neurodegenerative diseases.

In this respect, it is important to reiterate that in some experimental conditions in which treatment with lithium or VPA alone was either ineffective or only marginally beneficial, enhanced neuroprotection was observed as a result of cotreatment with both agents. This augmented neuroprotection was associated with potentiating GSK-3 inhibition and may involve particular miRNA mechanisms currently under investigation, although understanding the precise underlying mechanisms in detail will require future study. The benefits of cotreatment also extend to enhancing MSC migration via the upregulation of MMP-9 and CXCR4 by lithium and VPA, respectively. In addition, in transgenic mouse models of ALS and HD, cotreatment with lithium and VPA more robustly and consistently delayed disease syndrome progression, decreased behavioral deficits, and increased lifespan. These preclinical studies confirmed that using lithium and VPA together is a rational strategy with significant potential for treating neurodegenerative and neurologic diseases; indeed, we speculate that combination treatment may more effectively enhance neurotrophic and neuroprotective mechanisms. Future studies are required to confirm this hypothesis and to identify common targets to discover new treatment opportunities. Furthermore, despite their long history of safe clinical use, both lithium and VPA have adverse effects, especially at high doses. However, future clinical investigations that combine treatment with VPA and lithium could thus use lower doses of both drugs, which would reduce undesirable adverse effects and still achieve enhanced therapeutic actions.

In view of the many recent findings summarized above, we expect that future studies will shed considerable new light on how to more effectively target the mechanisms contributing to neurologic and neurodegenerative pathologies. New avenues of research into mechanisms mediated by miRNAs, for instance, are expected to reveal another layer of regulatory control and identify network nodes capable of modulating multiple signaling cascades. Validating miRNAs involved in fundamental disease processes (neuroinflammation, BBB integrity, and apoptosis) may also lead to the development of novel and more efficacious treatments capable of regulating multiple signaling networks. Finally, we predict that identifying the mechanisms regulated by lithium and VPA will steer genetic studies to identify susceptibility and protective genes for both neurologic and neurodegenerative diseases in which miRNA-mediated mechanisms may provide one of the unifying links among patient treatment response, therapeutic targets, and genetics.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ioline Henter, Elizabeth J. Sherman, Peter Leeds, and Fairouz Chibane for critical review and editorial assistance with this manuscript and the many collaborators involved in the studies discussed in this report.

Abbreviations

β-amyloid peptide

AD

Alzheimer’s disease

ALS

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

AMD3100

1,1′-[1,4-phenylenebis(methylene)]bis [1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane]

AP-1

activator protein 1

APP

amyloid precursor protein

AR-A014418

N-(4-methoxybenzyl)-N′-(5-nitro-1,3-thiazol-2-yl)urea

BBB

blood-brain barrier

Bcl-2

B-cell-lymphoma 2

BD

bipolar disorder

BDNF

brain-derived neurotrophic factor

CGCs

cerebellar granule cells

CNS

central nervous system

CREB

cAMP response element-binding protein

CXCR4

CXC chemokine receptor 4

DG

dentate gyrus

FXS

fragile X syndrome

GDNF

glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor

GM6001

N-[(2R)-2-(hydroxamidocarbonylmethyl)-4-methylpentanoyl]-l-tryptophan methylamide

GRP78

78-kDa glucose-regulated protein

GSK-3

glycogen synthase kinase-3

HD

Huntington’s disease

HDACs

histone deacetylases

HSF-1

heat shock factor-1

HSP70

heat shock protein 70

ITF2357

{6-[(diethylamino)methyl]naphthalen-2-yl}methyl [4-(hydroxycarbamoyl)phenyl]carbamate

LPS

lipopolysaccharide

LY294002

2-(4-morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one

MCAO

middle cerebral artery occlusion

miRNA

microRNA

MMP

matrix metalloproteinase

MSCs

mesenchymal stem cells

mHtt

mutant huntingtin

NF-κB

nuclear factor-κB

NMDA

N-methyl-d-aspartate

PI3K

phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

PSD-95

postsynaptic density-95

QA

quinolinic acid

ROS

reactive oxygen species

SB

sodium butyrate

SB216763

3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-(1-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione

SMA

spinal muscular atrophy

SOD

superoxide dismutase

SVZ

subventricular zone

TBI

traumatic brain injury

TSA

trichostatin A

U0126

1,4-diamino-2,3-dicyano-1,4-bis[2-aminophenylthio]butadiene

UPS

ubiquitin-proteasome system

VEGF

vascular endothelial growth factor

VPA

valproic acid

Authorship contributions

Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Chiu, Wang, Hunsberger, Chuang.

Footnotes

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Mental Health, Department of Health and Human Services (IRP-NIMH-NIH-DHHS).

References

  1. Abel T, Zukin RS. (2008) Epigenetic targets of HDAC inhibition in neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. Curr Opin Pharmacol 8:57–64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abematsu M, Tsujimura K, Yamano M, Saito M, Kohno K, Kohyama J, Namihira M, Komiya S, Nakashima K. (2010) Neurons derived from transplanted neural stem cells restore disrupted neuronal circuitry in a mouse model of spinal cord injury. J Clin Invest 120:3255–3266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aggarwal SP, Zinman L, Simpson E, McKinley J, Jackson KE, Pinto H, Kaufman P, Conwit RA, Schoenfeld D, Shefner J, et al. Northeast and Canadian Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis consortia (2010) Safety and efficacy of lithium in combination with riluzole for treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 9:481–488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alessi DR, Cohen P. (1998) Mechanism of activation and function of protein kinase B. Curr Opin Genet Dev 8:55–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alvarez G, Muñoz-Montaño JR, Satrústegui J, Avila J, Bogónez E, Díaz-Nido J. (1999) Lithium protects cultured neurons against beta-amyloid-induced neurodegeneration. FEBS Lett 453:260–264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Alvarez G, Muñoz-Montaño JR, Satrústegui J, Avila J, Bogónez E, Díaz-Nido J. (2002) Regulation of tau phosphorylation and protection against beta-amyloid-induced neurodegeneration by lithium. Possible implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Bipolar Disord 4:153–165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Aminoff MJ, Marshall J. (1974) Treatment of Huntington’s chorea with lithium carbonate. A double-blind trial. Lancet 1:107–109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Andén NE, Dalén P, Johansson B. (1973) Baclofen and lithium in Huntington’s chorea. Lancet 2:93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Andersen PM, Al-Chalabi A. (2011) Clinical genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: what do we really know? Nat Rev Neurol 7:603–615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Andreazza AC, Kapczinski F, Kauer-Sant'Anna M, Walz JC, Bond DJ, Goncalves CA, Young LT, and Yatham LN (2009) 3-Nitrotyrosine and glutathione antioxidant system in patients in the early and late stages of bipolar disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci 34:263–271. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Andreazza AC, Kauer-Sant’anna M, Frey BN, Bond DJ, Kapczinski F, Young LT, Yatham LN. (2008) Oxidative stress markers in bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 111:135–144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Andreopoulos S, Wasserman M, Woo K, Li PP, Warsh JJ. (2004) Chronic lithium treatment of B lymphoblasts from bipolar disorder patients reduces transient receptor potential channel 3 levels. Pharmacogenomics J 4:365–373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Angelucci F, Aloe L, Jiménez-Vasquez P, Mathé AA. (2003) Lithium treatment alters brain concentrations of nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in a rat model of depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 6:225–231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ansari MA, Roberts KN, Scheff SW. (2008) Oxidative stress and modification of synaptic proteins in hippocampus after traumatic brain injury. Free Radic Biol Med 45:443–452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Aoki T, Koike T, Nakano T, Shibahara K, Kondo S, Kikuchi H, Honjo T. (1997) Induction of Bip mRNA upon programmed cell death of differentiated PC12 cells as well as rat sympathetic neurons. J Biochem 121:122–127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Arraf Z, Amit T, Youdim MB, Farah R. (2012) Lithium and oxidative stress lessons from the MPTP model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci Lett 516:57–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Arvidsson A, Collin T, Kirik D, Kokaia Z, Lindvall O. (2002) Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke. Nat Med 8:963–970 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Autry AE, Monteggia LM. (2012) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacol Rev 64:238–258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Barber PA, Zhang J, Demchuk AM, Hill MD, Buchan AM. (2001) Why are stroke patients excluded from TPA therapy? An analysis of patient eligibility. Neurology 56:1015–1020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Barber SC, Shaw PJ. (2010) Oxidative stress in ALS: key role in motor neuron injury and therapeutic target. Free Radic Biol Med 48:629–641 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Barton JH, Emanuel EJ. (2005) The patents-based pharmaceutical development process: rationale, problems, and potential reforms. JAMA 294:2075–2082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bauer S, Kerr BJ, Patterson PH. (2007) The neuropoietic cytokine family in development, plasticity, disease and injury. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:221–232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Baumgardner TL, Reiss AL, Freund LS, Abrams MT. (1995) Specification of the neurobehavioral phenotype in males with fragile X syndrome. Pediatrics 95:744–752 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Beal MF, Kowall NW, Ellison DW, Mazurek MF, Swartz KJ, Martin JB. (1986) Replication of the neurochemical characteristics of Huntington’s disease by quinolinic acid. Nature 321:168–171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Bear MF, Huber KM, Warren ST. (2004) The mGluR theory of fragile X mental retardation. Trends Neurosci 27:370–377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bearden CE, Thompson PM, Dalwani M, Hayashi KM, Lee AD, Nicoletti M, Trakhtenbroit M, Glahn DC, Brambilla P, Sassi RB, et al. (2007) Greater cortical gray matter density in lithium-treated patients with bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 62:7–16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bearden CE, Thompson PM, Dutton RA, Frey BN, Peluso MA, Nicoletti M, Dierschke N, Hayashi KM, Klunder AD, Glahn DC, et al. (2008) Three-dimensional mapping of hippocampal anatomy in unmedicated and lithium-treated patients with bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:1229–1238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Beaulieu JM, Marion S, Rodriguiz RM, Medvedev IO, Sotnikova TD, Ghisi V, Wetsel WC, Lefkowitz RJ, Gainetdinov RR, Caron MG. (2008) A beta-arrestin 2 signaling complex mediates lithium action on behavior. Cell 132:125–136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Beck H, Plate KH. (2009) Angiogenesis after cerebral ischemia. Acta Neuropathol 117:481–496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Beere HM, Wolf BB, Cain K, Mosser DD, Mahboubi A, Kuwana T, Tailor P, Morimoto RI, Cohen GM, Green DR. (2000) Heat-shock protein 70 inhibits apoptosis by preventing recruitment of procaspase-9 to the Apaf-1 apoptosome. Nat Cell Biol 2:469–475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Bemelmans AP, Horellou P, Pradier L, Brunet I, Colin P, Mallet J. (1999) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor-mediated protection of striatal neurons in an excitotoxic rat model of Huntington’s disease, as demonstrated by adenoviral gene transfer. Hum Gene Ther 10:2987–2997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Berger Z, Ravikumar B, Menzies FM, Oroz LG, Underwood BR, Pangalos MN, Schmitt I, Wullner U, Evert BO, O'Kane CJ, et al. (2006) Rapamycin alleviates toxicity of different aggregate-prone proteins. Hum Mol Genet 15:433–442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Berger Z, Ttofi EK, Michel CH, Pasco MY, Tenant S, Rubinsztein DC, O’Kane CJ. (2005) Lithium rescues toxicity of aggregate-prone proteins in Drosophila by perturbing Wnt pathway. Hum Mol Genet 14:3003–3011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Berry-Kravis E, Sumis A, Hervey C, Nelson M, Porges SW, Weng N, Weiler IJ, Greenough WT. (2008) Open-label treatment trial of lithium to target the underlying defect in fragile X syndrome. J Dev Behav Pediatr 29:293–302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Bhat RV, Budd Haeberlein SL, Avila J. (2004) Glycogen synthase kinase 3: a drug target for CNS therapies. J Neurochem 89:1313–1317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Bian Q, Shi T, Chuang DM, Qian Y. (2007) Lithium reduces ischemia-induced hippocampal CA1 damage and behavioral deficits in gerbils. Brain Res 1184:270–276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Bianchi P, Ciani E, Contestabile A, Guidi S, Bartesaghi R. (2010) Lithium restores neurogenesis in the subventricular zone of the Ts65Dn mouse, a model for Down syndrome. Brain Pathol 20:106–118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Biermann J, Boyle J, Pielen A, Lagrèze WA. (2011) Histone deacetylase inhibitors sodium butyrate and valproic acid delay spontaneous cell death in purified rat retinal ganglion cells. Mol Vis 17:395–403 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Biermann J, Grieshaber P, Goebel U, Martin G, Thanos S, Di Giovanni S, Lagrèze WA. (2010) Valproic acid-mediated neuroprotection and regeneration in injured retinal ganglion cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:526–534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Bijur GN, Jope RS. (2000) Opposing actions of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and glycogen synthase kinase-3beta in the regulation of HSF-1 activity. J Neurochem 75:2401–2408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Blauw HM, Barnes CP, van Vught PW, van Rheenen W, Verheul M, Cuppen E, Veldink JH, van den Berg LH. (2012) SMN1 gene duplications are associated with sporadic ALS. Neurology 78:776–780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Boillée S, Vande Velde C, Cleveland DW. (2006) ALS: a disease of motor neurons and their nonneuronal neighbors. Neuron 52:39–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Bown CD, Wang JF, Young LT. (2000) Increased expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress proteins following chronic valproate treatment of rat C6 glioma cells. Neuropharmacology 39:2162–2169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Brichta L, Hofmann Y, Hahnen E, Siebzehnrubl FA, Raschke H, Blumcke I, Eyupoglu IY, Wirth B. (2003) Valproic acid increases the SMN2 protein level: a well-known drug as a potential therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. Hum Mol Genet 12:2481–2489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Brinkman SD, Pomara N, Barnett N, Block R, Domino EF, Gershon S. (1984) Lithium-induced increases in red blood cell choline and memory performance in Alzheimer-type dementia. Biol Psychiatry 19:157–164 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Brockington A, Wharton SB, Fernando M, Gelsthorpe CH, Baxter L, Ince PG, Lewis CE, Shaw PJ. (2006) Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in the central nervous system in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 65:26–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Bromley RL, Baker GA, Meador KJ. (2009) Cognitive abilities and behaviour of children exposed to antiepileptic drugs in utero. Curr Opin Neurol 22:162–166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Brouillet E, Condé F, Beal MF, Hantraye P. (1999) Replicating Huntington’s disease phenotype in experimental animals. Prog Neurobiol 59:427–468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Brownlees J, Irving NG, Brion JP, Gibb BJ, Wagner U, Woodgett J, Miller CC. (1997) Tau phosphorylation in transgenic mice expressing glycogen synthase kinase-3beta transgenes. Neuroreport 8:3251–3255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Buechler RD, Buchhalter JR. (2007) Juvenile absence epilepsy exacerbated by valproic acid. Pediatr Neurol 36:121–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Calderó J, Brunet N, Tarabal O, Piedrafita L, Hereu M, Ayala V, Esquerda JE. (2010) Lithium prevents excitotoxic cell death of motoneurons in organotypic slice cultures of spinal cord. Neuroscience 165:1353–1369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Canals JM, Pineda JR, Torres-Peraza JF, Bosch M, Martín-Ibañez R, Muñoz MT, Mengod G, Ernfors P, Alberch J. (2004) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor regulates the onset and severity of motor dysfunction associated with enkephalinergic neuronal degeneration in Huntington’s disease. J Neurosci 24:7727–7739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Caricasole A, Copani A, Caraci F, Aronica E, Rozemuller AJ, Caruso A, Storto M, Gaviraghi G, Terstappen GC, Nicoletti F. (2004) Induction of Dickkopf-1, a negative modulator of the Wnt pathway, is associated with neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer’s brain. J Neurosci 24:6021–6027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Carman JS, Shoulson I, Chase TN. (1974) Letter: Huntington’s chorea treated with lithium carbonate. Lancet 1:811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Carmeliet P. (2003) Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nat Med 9:653–660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Carmichael J, Sugars KL, Bao YP, Rubinsztein DC. (2002) Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta inhibitors prevent cellular polyglutamine toxicity caused by the Huntington’s disease mutation. J Biol Chem 277:33791–33798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Castro AA, Ghisoni K, Latini A, Quevedo J, Tasca CI, Prediger RD. (2012) Lithium and valproate prevent olfactory discrimination and short-term memory impairments in the intranasal 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Behav Brain Res 229:208–215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Cha JH. (2007) Transcriptional signatures in Huntington’s disease. Prog Neurobiol 83:228–248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Chakraborty G, Saito M, Mao RF, Wang R, Vadasz C, Saito M. (2008) Lithium blocks ethanol-induced modulation of protein kinases in the developing brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 367:597–602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Chalecka-Franaszek E, Chuang DM. (1999) Lithium activates the serine/threonine kinase Akt-1 and suppresses glutamate-induced inhibition of Akt-1 activity in neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:8745–8750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Chan HY, Warrick JM, Gray-Board GL, Paulson HL, Bonini NM. (2000) Mechanisms of chaperone suppression of polyglutamine disease: selectivity, synergy and modulation of protein solubility in Drosophila. Hum Mol Genet 9:2811–2820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Chang F, Steelman LS, Shelton JG, Lee JT, Navolanic PM, Blalock WL, Franklin R, McCubrey JA. (2003) Regulation of cell cycle progression and apoptosis by the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway (Review). Review Int J Oncol 22:469–480 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Chateauvieux S, Morceau F, Dicato M, Diederich M. (2010) Molecular and therapeutic potential and toxicity of valproic acid. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010:2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Chen G, Bower KA, Ma C, Fang S, Thiele CJ, Luo J. (2004) Glycogen synthase kinase 3beta (GSK3beta) mediates 6-hydroxydopamine-induced neuronal death. FASEB J 18:1162–1164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Chen G, Huang LD, Jiang YM, Manji HK. (1999a) The mood-stabilizing agent valproate inhibits the activity of glycogen synthase kinase-3. J Neurochem 72:1327–1330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Chen G, Rajkowska G, Du F, Seraji-Bozorgzad N, Manji HK. (2000) Enhancement of hippocampal neurogenesis by lithium. J Neurochem 75:1729–1734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Chen G, Zeng WZ, Yuan PX, Huang LD, Jiang YM, Zhao ZH, Manji HK. (1999b) The mood-stabilizing agents lithium and valproate robustly increase the levels of the neuroprotective protein bcl-2 in the CNS. J Neurochem 72:879–882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Chen H, Yoshioka H, Kim GS, Jung JE, Okami N, Sakata H, Maier CM, Narasimhan P, Goeders CE, Chan PH. (2011) Oxidative stress in ischemic brain damage: mechanisms of cell death and potential molecular targets for neuroprotection. Antioxid Redox Signal 14:1505–1517 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Chen PS, Peng GS, Li G, Yang S, Wu X, Wang CC, Wilson B, Lu RB, Gean PW, Chuang DM, et al. (2006) Valproate protects dopaminergic neurons in midbrain neuron/glia cultures by stimulating the release of neurotrophic factors from astrocytes. Mol Psychiatry 11:1116–1125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Chen PS, Wang CC, Bortner CD, Peng GS, Wu X, Pang H, Lu RB, Gean PW, Chuang DM, Hong JS. (2007) Valproic acid and other histone deacetylase inhibitors induce microglial apoptosis and attenuate lipopolysaccharide-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity. Neuroscience 149:203–212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Chen RW, Chuang DM. (1999) Long term lithium treatment suppresses p53 and Bax expression but increases Bcl-2 expression. A prominent role in neuroprotection against excitotoxicity. J Biol Chem 274:6039–6042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Chiang MC, Chen HM, Lee YH, Chang HH, Wu YC, Soong BW, Chen CM, Wu YR, Liu CS, Niu DM, et al. (2007) Dysregulation of C/EBPalpha by mutant Huntingtin causes the urea cycle deficiency in Huntington’s disease. Hum Mol Genet 16:483–498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Chiò A, Borghero G, Calvo A, Capasso M, Caponnetto C, Corbo M, Giannini F, Logroscino G, Mandrioli J, Marcello N, et al. LITALS Study Group (2010) Lithium carbonate in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: lack of efficacy in a dose-finding trial. Neurology 75:619–625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Chiu CT, Chuang DM. (2010) Molecular actions and therapeutic potential of lithium in preclinical and clinical studies of CNS disorders. Pharmacol Ther 128:281–304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Chiu CT, Liu G, Leeds P, Chuang DM. (2011) Combined treatment with the mood stabilizers lithium and valproate produces multiple beneficial effects in transgenic mouse models of Huntington’s disease. Neuropsychopharmacology 36:2406–2421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Cho KS, Chen DF. (2008) Promoting optic nerve regeneration in adult mice with pharmaceutical approach. Neurochem Res 33:2126–2133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Choi CH, McBride SM, Schoenfeld BP, Liebelt DA, Ferreiro D, Ferrick NJ, Hinchey P, Kollaros M, Rudominer RL, Terlizzi AM, et al. (2010) Age-dependent cognitive impairment in a Drosophila fragile X model and its pharmacological rescue. Biogerontology 11:347–362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Chuang DM, Leng Y, Marinova Z, Kim HJ, Chiu CT. (2009) Multiple roles of HDAC inhibition in neurodegenerative conditions. Trends Neurosci 32:591–601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Chuang DM, Wang Z and Chiu CT (2011) GSK-3 as a Target for Lithium-Induced Neuroprotection Against Excitotoxicity in Neuronal Cultures and Animal Models of Ischemic Stroke. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience 4:15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  80. Ciani L, Salinas PC. (2005) WNTs in the vertebrate nervous system: from patterning to neuronal connectivity. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:351–362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Cimarosti H, Rodnight R, Tavares A, Paiva R, Valentim L, Rocha E, Salbego C. (2001) An investigation of the neuroprotective effect of lithium in organotypic slice cultures of rat hippocampus exposed to oxygen and glucose deprivation. Neurosci Lett 315:33–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Cipriani A, Pretty H, Hawton K, Geddes JR. (2005) Lithium in the prevention of suicidal behavior and all-cause mortality in patients with mood disorders: a systematic review of randomized trials. Am J Psychiatry 162:1805–1819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Clayton-Smith J, Donnai D. (1995) Fetal valproate syndrome. J Med Genet 32:724–727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Coffee B, Zhang F, Warren ST, Reines D. (1999) Acetylated histones are associated with FMR1 in normal but not fragile X-syndrome cells. Nat Genet 22:98–101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Cogle CR, Yachnis AT, Laywell ED, Zander DS, Wingard JR, Steindler DA, Scott EW. (2004) Bone marrow transdifferentiation in brain after transplantation: a retrospective study. Lancet 363:1432–1437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Corcia P, Camu W, Halimi JM, Vourc’h P, Antar C, Vedrine S, Giraudeau B, de Toffol B, Andres CR, French ALS Study Group (2006) SMN1 gene, but not SMN2, is a risk factor for sporadic ALS. Neurology 67:1147–1150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Corcia P, Camu W, Praline J, Gordon PH, Vourch P, Andres C. (2009) The importance of the SMN genes in the genetics of sporadic ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 10:436–440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Corcia P, Ingre C, Blasco H, Press R, Praline J, Antar C, Veyrat-Durebex C, Guettard YO, Camu W, Andersen PM, Vourc'h P, et al. (2012) Homozygous SMN2 deletion is a protective factor in the Swedish ALS population. Eur J Hum Genet 20:588–591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Corcia P, Mayeux-Portas V, Khoris J, de Toffol B, Autret A, Müh JP, Camu W, Andres C, French ALS Research Group. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (2002) Abnormal SMN1 gene copy number is a susceptibility factor for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol 51:243–246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Coyle JT, Schwarcz R. (1976) Lesion of striatal neurones with kainic acid provides a model for Huntington’s chorea. Nature 263:244–246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Creson TK, Austin DR, Shaltiel G, McCammon J, Wess J, Manji HK, Chen G. (2011) Lithium treatment attenuates muscarinic M(1) receptor dysfunction. Bipolar Disord 13:238–249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Crespo-Biel N, Camins A, Pallàs M, Canudas AM. (2009) Evidence of calpain/cdk5 pathway inhibition by lithium in 3-nitropropionic acid toxicity in vivo and in vitro. Neuropharmacology 56:422–428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Crochemore C, Virgili M, Bonamassa B, Canistro D, Pena-Altamira E, Paolini M, Contestabile A. (2009) Long-term dietary administration of valproic acid does not affect, while retinoic acid decreases, the lifespan of G93A mice, a model for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 39:548–552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Crossley NA, Bauer M. (2007) Acceleration and augmentation of antidepressants with lithium for depressive disorders: two meta-analyses of randomized, placebo-controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry 68:935–940 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Cuervo AM. (2004) Autophagy: many paths to the same end. Mol Cell Biochem 263:55–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. D’Souza R, Rajji TK, Mulsant BH, Pollock BG. (2011) Use of lithium in the treatment of bipolar disorder in late-life. Curr Psychiatry Rep 13:488–492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Dash PK, Johnson D, Clark J, Orsi SA, Zhang M, Zhao J, Grill RJ, Moore AN, Pati S. (2011) Involvement of the glycogen synthase kinase-3 signaling pathway in TBI pathology and neurocognitive outcome. PLoS ONE 6:e24648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Dash PK, Orsi SA, Moore AN. (2009) Histone deactylase inhibition combined with behavioral therapy enhances learning and memory following traumatic brain injury. Neuroscience 163:1–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Dash PK, Orsi SA, Zhang M, Grill RJ, Pati S, Zhao J, Moore AN. (2010) Valproate administered after traumatic brain injury provides neuroprotection and improves cognitive function in rats. PLoS ONE 5:e11383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. de Carvalho M, Pinto S. (2011) Lithium treatment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: do we have enough trials? Expert Rev Neurother 11:1693–1698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. De Ferrari GV, Chacón MA, Barría MI, Garrido JL, Godoy JA, Olivares G, Reyes AE, Alvarez A, Bronfman M, Inestrosa NC. (2003) Activation of Wnt signaling rescues neurodegeneration and behavioral impairments induced by beta-amyloid fibrils. Mol Psychiatry 8:195–208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. De Sarno P, Axtell RC, Raman C, Roth KA, Alessi DR, Jope RS. (2008) Lithium prevents and ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol 181:338–345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. De Sarno P, Li X, Jope RS. (2002) Regulation of Akt and glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta phosphorylation by sodium valproate and lithium. Neuropharmacology 43:1158–1164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. de Sousa RT, van de Bilt MT, Diniz BS, Ladeira RB, Portela LV, Souza DO, Forlenza OV, Gattaz WF, Machado-Vieira R. (2011) Lithium increases plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor in acute bipolar mania: a preliminary 4-week study. Neurosci Lett 494:54–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Di Daniel E, Mudge AW, Maycox PR. (2005) Comparative analysis of the effects of four mood stabilizers in SH-SY5Y cells and in primary neurons. Bipolar Disord 7:33–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Di Maio L, Squitieri F, Napolitano G, Campanella G, Trofatter JA, Conneally PM. (1993) Suicide risk in Huntington’s disease. J Med Genet 30:293–295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Dikmen SS, Machamer JE, Winn HR, Anderson GD, Temkin NR. (2000) Neuropsychological effects of valproate in traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial. Neurology 54:895–902 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Dill J, Wang H, Zhou F, Li S. (2008) Inactivation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 promotes axonal growth and recovery in the CNS. J Neurosci 28:8914–8928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Dinan TG. (2010) MicroRNAs as a target for novel antipsychotics: a systematic review of an emerging field. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 13:395–404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Dobrowolny G, Aucello M, Rizzuto E, Beccafico S, Mammucari C, Boncompagni S, Belia S, Wannenes F, Nicoletti C, Del PZ, et al. (2008) Skeletal muscle is a primary target of SOD1G93A-mediated toxicity. Cell Metab 8:425–436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Dolder C, McKinsey J. (2010) Low-dose divalproex in agitated patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Psychiatr Pract 16:63–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Dölen G, Osterweil E, Rao BS, Smith GB, Auerbach BD, Chattarji S, Bear MF. (2007) Correction of fragile X syndrome in mice. Neuron 56:955–962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Dou H, Ellison B, Bradley J, Kasiyanov A, Poluektova LY, Xiong H, Maggirwar S, Dewhurst S, Gelbard HA, Gendelman HE. (2005) Neuroprotective mechanisms of lithium in murine human immunodeficiency virus-1 encephalitis. J Neurosci 25:8375–8385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Dröge W. (2002) Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function. Physiol Rev 82:47–95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Duan W, Guo Z, Jiang H, Ware M, Li XJ, Mattson MP. (2003) Dietary restriction normalizes glucose metabolism and BDNF levels, slows disease progression, and increases survival in huntingtin mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:2911–2916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Duan W, Peng Q, Masuda N, Ford E, Tryggestad E, Ladenheim B, Zhao M, Cadet JL, Wong J, Ross CA. (2008) Sertraline slows disease progression and increases neurogenesis in N171-82Q mouse model of Huntington’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 30:312–322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Duka T, Duka V, Joyce JN, Sidhu A. (2009) Alpha-Synuclein contributes to GSK-3beta-catalyzed Tau phosphorylation in Parkinson’s disease models. FASEB J 23:2820–2830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Dweep H, Sticht C, Pandey P, Gretz N. (2011) miRWalk—database: prediction of possible miRNA binding sites by “walking” the genes of three genomes. J Biomed Inform 44:839–847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Eacker SM, Dawson TM, Dawson VL. (2009) Understanding microRNAs in neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:837–841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Everall IP, Bell C, Mallory M, Langford D, Adame A, Rockestein E, Masliah E. (2002) Lithium ameliorates HIV-gp120-mediated neurotoxicity. Mol Cell Neurosci 21:493–501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Fan Y, Yang GY. (2007) Therapeutic angiogenesis for brain ischemia: a brief review. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 2:284–289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Faraco G, Pancani T, Formentini L, Mascagni P, Fossati G, Leoni F, Moroni F, Chiarugi A. (2006) Pharmacological inhibition of histone deacetylases by suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid specifically alters gene expression and reduces ischemic injury in the mouse brain. Mol Pharmacol 70:1876–1884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Fass DM, Shah R, Ghosh B, Hennig K, Norton S, Zhao WN, Reis SA, Klein PS, Mazitschek R, et al. (2010) Effect of inhibiting histone deacetylase with short-chain carboxylic acids and their hydroxamic acid analogs on vertebrate development and neuronal chromatin. ACS Med Chem Lett 2:39–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  124. Fei W, Aixi Y, Danmou X, Wusheng K, Zhengren P, Ting R. (2011) The mood stabilizer valproic acid induces proliferation and myelination of rat Schwann cells. Neurosci Res 70:383–390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Feinstein DL, Galea E, Aquino DA, Li GC, Xu H, Reis DJ. (1996) Heat shock protein 70 suppresses astroglial-inducible nitric-oxide synthase expression by decreasing NFkappaB activation. J Biol Chem 271:17724–17732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Feng HL, Leng Y, Ma CH, Zhang J, Ren M, Chuang DM. (2008) Combined lithium and valproate treatment delays disease onset, reduces neurological deficits and prolongs survival in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse model. Neuroscience 155:567–572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Feng YT. (1979) The necessity for a collection development policy statement. Libr Resour Tech Serv 23:39–44 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Ferrara N, Gerber HP, LeCouter J. (2003) The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med 9:669–676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Ferrer I, Goutan E, Marín C, Rey MJ, Ribalta T. (2000) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor in Huntington disease. Brain Res 866:257–261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Ferrucci M, Spalloni A, Bartalucci A, Cantafora E, Fulceri F, Nutini M, Longone P, Paparelli A, Fornai F. (2010) A systematic study of brainstem motor nuclei in a mouse model of ALS, the effects of lithium. Neurobiol Dis 37:370–383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Fink AL. (1999) Chaperone-mediated protein folding. Physiol Rev 79:425–449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Finkbeiner S. (2000) CREB couples neurotrophin signals to survival messages. Neuron 25:11–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Focosi D, Azzarà A, Kast RE, Carulli G, Petrini M. (2009) Lithium and hematology: established and proposed uses. J Leukoc Biol 85:20–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Foerster K, Regli F. (1977) [Lithium therapy of extrapyramidal movement disorders-an attempt (author’s transl)]. Nervenarzt 48:228–232 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Forester BP, Streeter CC, Berlow YA, Tian H, Wardrop M, Finn CT, Harper D, Renshaw PF, Moore CM. (2009) Brain lithium levels and effects on cognition and mood in geriatric bipolar disorder: a lithium-7 magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 17:13–23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Forlenza OV, Diniz BS, Radanovic M, Santos FS, Talib LL, Gattaz WF. (2011) Disease-modifying properties of long-term lithium treatment for amnestic mild cognitive impairment: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 198:351–356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Forman JJ, Legesse-Miller A, Coller HA. (2008) A search for conserved sequences in coding regions reveals that the let-7 microRNA targets Dicer within its coding sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:14879–14884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Fornai F, Longone P, Cafaro L, Kastsiuchenka O, Ferrucci M, Manca ML, Lazzeri G, Spalloni A, Bellio N, Lenzi P, et al. (2008) Lithium delays progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:2052–2057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Foster AC, Collins JF, Schwarcz R. (1983) On the excitotoxic properties of quinolinic acid, 2,3-piperidine dicarboxylic acids and structurally related compounds. Neuropharmacology 22 (12A):1331–1342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. French RL, Heberlein U. (2009) Glycogen synthase kinase-3/Shaggy mediates ethanol-induced excitotoxic cell death of Drosophila olfactory neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:20924–20929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Friedlander RM. (2003) Apoptosis and caspases in neurodegenerative diseases. N Engl J Med 348:1365–1375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Fujimoto M, Takaki E, Hayashi T, Kitaura Y, Tanaka Y, Inouye S, Nakai A. (2005) Active HSF1 significantly suppresses polyglutamine aggregate formation in cellular and mouse models. J Biol Chem 280:34908–34916 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Fukumoto T, Morinobu S, Okamoto Y, Kagaya A, Yamawaki S. (2001) Chronic lithium treatment increases the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the rat brain. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 158:100–106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Fulceri F, Ferrucci M, Lazzeri G, Paparelli S, Bartalucci A, Tamburini I, Paparelli A, Fornai F. (2011) Autophagy activation in glutamate-induced motor neuron loss. Arch Ital Biol 149:101–111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Gafni J, Ellerby LM. (2002) Calpain activation in Huntington’s disease. J Neurosci 22:4842–4849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Gandjour A, Chernyak N. (2011) A new prize system for drug innovation. Health Policy 102:170–177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Gao TY, Newton AC. (2002) The turn motif is a phosphorylation switch that regulates the binding of Hsp70 to protein kinase C. J Biol Chem 277:31585–31592 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Gao XM, Fukamauchi F, Chuang DM. (1993) Long-term biphasic effects of lithium treatment on phospholipase C-coupled M3-muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in cultured cerebellar granule cells. Neurochem Int 22:395–403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Garber K, Smith KT, Reines D, Warren ST. (2006) Transcription, translation and fragile X syndrome. Curr Opin Genet Dev 16:270–275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Gavrilov DK, Shi X, Das K, Gilliam TC, Wang CH. (1998) Differential SMN2 expression associated with SMA severity. Nat Genet 20:230–231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Geddes JR, Burgess S, Hawton K, Jamison K, Goodwin GM. (2004) Long-term lithium therapy for bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Psychiatry 161:217–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Gentile S. (2011) Drug treatment for mood disorders in pregnancy. Curr Opin Psychiatry 24:34–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Gentile S. (2012) Lithium in pregnancy: the need to treat, the duty to ensure safety. Expert Opin Drug Saf 11:425–437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Genton P, Semah F, Trinka E. (2006) Valproic acid in epilepsy : pregnancy-related issues. Drug Saf 29:1–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Ghribi O, Herman MM, Savory J. (2003) Lithium inhibits Abeta-induced stress in endoplasmic reticulum of rabbit hippocampus but does not prevent oxidative damage and tau phosphorylation. J Neurosci Res 71:853–862 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Gill A, Kidd J, Vieira F, Thompson K, Perrin S. (2009) No benefit from chronic lithium dosing in a sibling-matched, gender balanced, investigator-blinded trial using a standard mouse model of familial ALS. PLoS ONE 4:e6489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Goldman S. (2005) Stem and progenitor cell-based therapy of the human central nervous system. Nat Biotechnol 23:862–871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Goodwin FK, Jamison KR. (2007) Manic-Depressive Illness: Bipolar Disorders and Recurrent Depression, Oxford University Press, New York [Google Scholar]
  159. Gorbatyuk MS, Shabashvili A, Chen W, Meyers C, Sullivan LF, Salganik M, Lin JH, Lewin AS, Muzyczka N, Gorbatyuk OS. (2012) Glucose regulated protein 78 diminishes α-synuclein neurotoxicity in a rat model of Parkinson disease. Mol Ther 20:1327–1337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Göttlicher M, Minucci S, Zhu P, Kramer OH, Schimpf A, Giavara S, Sleeman JP, Lo Coco F, Nervi C, Pelicci PG, et al. (2001) Valproic acid defines a novel class of HDAC inhibitors inducing differentiation of transformed cells. EMBO J 20:6969–6978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Gould TD, Chen G, Manji HK. (2004a) In vivo evidence in the brain for lithium inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:32–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Gould TD, Einat H, Bhat R, Manji HK. (2004b) AR-A014418, a selective GSK-3 inhibitor, produces antidepressant-like effects in the forced swim test. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 7:387–390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Gould TD, Einat H, O’Donnell KC, Picchini AM, Schloesser RJ, Manji HK. (2007) Beta-catenin overexpression in the mouse brain phenocopies lithium-sensitive behaviors. Neuropsychopharmacology 32:2173–2183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Gould TD, Manji HK. (2005) Glycogen synthase kinase-3: a putative molecular target for lithium mimetic drugs. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:1223–1237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Gould TD, O’Donnell KC, Picchini AM, Dow ER, Chen G, Manji HK. (2008) Generation and behavioral characterization of beta-catenin forebrain-specific conditional knock-out mice. Behav Brain Res 189:117–125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Gould TD, Quiroz JA, Singh J, Zarate CA, Manji HK. (2004c) Emerging experimental therapeutics for bipolar disorder: insights from the molecular and cellular actions of current mood stabilizers. Mol Psychiatry 9:734–755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Govindarajan N, Agis-Balboa RC, Walter J, Sananbenesi F, Fischer A. (2011) Sodium butyrate improves memory function in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model when administered at an advanced stage of disease progression. J Alzheimers Dis 26:187–197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Gräff J, Rei D, Guan JS, Kramer OH, Schimpf A, Giavara S, Sleeman JP, Lo Coco F, Nervi C, Pelicci PG, et al. (2012) An epigenetic blockade of cognitive functions in the neurodegenerating brain. Nature 483:222–226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Grosso S, Mostardini R, Piccini B, Balestri P. (2009) Body mass index and serum lipid changes during treatment with valproic acid in children with epilepsy. Ann Pharmacother 43:45–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Grove VE, Jr, Quintanilla J, DeVaney GT. (2000) Improvement of Huntington’s disease with olanzapine and valproate. N Engl J Med 343:973–974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Guan JS, Haggarty SJ, Giacometti E, Dannenberg JH, Joseph N, Gao J, Nieland TJ, Zhou Y, Wang X, Mazitschek R, et al. (2009) HDAC2 negatively regulates memory formation and synaptic plasticity. Nature 459:55–60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Gul H, Marquez-Curtis LA, Jahroudi N, Lo J, Turner AR, Janowska-Wieczorek A. (2009) Valproic acid increases CXCR4 expression in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells by chromatin remodeling. Stem Cells Dev 18:831–838 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Guo S, Arai K, Stins MF, Chuang DM, Lo EH. (2009) Lithium upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor in brain endothelial cells and astrocytes. Stroke 40:652–655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Gupta A, Schulze TG, Nagarajan V, Akula N, Corona W, Jiang XY, Hunter N, McMahon FJ, Detera-Wadleigh SD. (2012) Interaction networks of lithium and valproate molecular targets reveal a striking enrichment of apoptosis functional clusters and neurotrophin signaling. Pharmacogenomics J 12:328–341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Gurvich N, Tsygankova OM, Meinkoth JL, Klein PS. (2004) Histone deacetylase is a target of valproic acid-mediated cellular differentiation. Cancer Res 64:1079–1086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Hagerman RJ, Hills J, Scharfenaker S, Lewis H. (1999) Fragile X syndrome and selective mutism. Am J Med Genet 83:313–317 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Hagerman RJ, Ono MY, Hagerman PJ. (2005) Recent advances in fragile X: a model for autism and neurodegeneration. Curr Opin Psychiatry 18:490–496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Hajek T, Bauer M, Pfennig A, Cullis J, Ploch J, O'Donovan C, Bohner G, Klingebiel R, Young LT, Macqueen GM, et al. (2012) Large positive effect of lithium on prefrontal cortex N-acetylaspartate in patients with bipolar disorder: 2-centre study. J Psychiatry Neurosci 37:185–192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Hamilton JM, Salmon DP, Corey-Bloom J, Gamst A, Paulsen JS, Jerkins S, Jacobson MW, Peavy G. (2003) Behavioural abnormalities contribute to functional decline in Huntington’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:120–122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Hampel H, Ewers M, Bürger K, Annas P, Mortberg A, Bogstedt A, Frolich L, Schroder J, Schonknecht P, Riepe MW, et al. (2009) Lithium trial in Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter 10-week study. J Clin Psychiatry 70:922–931 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Handoko KB, Souverein PC, van Staa TP, Meyboom RH, Leufkens HG, Egberts TC, van den Bemt PM. (2006) Risk of aplastic anemia in patients using antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia 47:1232–1236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Hanger DP, Hughes K, Woodgett JR, Brion JP, Anderton BH. (1992) Glycogen synthase kinase-3 induces Alzheimer’s disease-like phosphorylation of tau: generation of paired helical filament epitopes and neuronal localisation of the kinase. Neurosci Lett 147:58–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Hao Y, Creson T, Zhang L, Li P, Du F, Yuan P, Gould TD, Manji HK, Chen G. (2004) Mood stabilizer valproate promotes ERK pathway-dependent cortical neuronal growth and neurogenesis. J Neurosci 24:6590–6599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Harahap IS, Saito T, San LP, Sasaki N, Gunadi, Nurputra DK, Yusoff S, Yamamoto T, Morikawa S, Nishimura N, et al. (2012) Valproic acid increases SMN2 expression and modulates SF2/ASF and hnRNPA1 expression in SMA fibroblast cell lines. Brain Dev 34:213–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Hardy J, Selkoe DJ. (2002) The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science 297:353–356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M. (2002) Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein. Science 295:1852–1858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Hashimoto R, Fujimaki K, Jeong MR, Christ L, Chuang DM. (2003a) Lithium-induced inhibition of Src tyrosine kinase in rat cerebral cortical neurons: a role in neuroprotection against N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity. FEBS Lett 538:145–148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Hashimoto R, Hough C, Nakazawa T, Yamamoto T, Chuang DM. (2002a) Lithium protection against glutamate excitotoxicity in rat cerebral cortical neurons: involvement of NMDA receptor inhibition possibly by decreasing NR2B tyrosine phosphorylation. J Neurochem 80:589–597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Hashimoto R, Senatorov V, Kanai H, Leeds P, Chuang DM. (2003b) Lithium stimulates progenitor proliferation in cultured brain neurons. Neuroscience 117:55–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Hashimoto R, Takei N, Shimazu K, Christ L, Lu B, Chuang DM. (2002b) Lithium induces brain-derived neurotrophic factor and activates TrkB in rodent cortical neurons: an essential step for neuroprotection against glutamate excitotoxicity. Neuropharmacology 43:1173–1179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Hay DG, Sathasivam K, Tobaben S, Stahl B, Marber M, Mestril R, Mahal A, Smith DL, Woodman B, Bates GP. (2004) Progressive decrease in chaperone protein levels in a mouse model of Huntington’s disease and induction of stress proteins as a therapeutic approach. Hum Mol Genet 13:1389–1405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Hayashi A, Kasahara T, Kametani M, Toyota T, Yoshikawa T, Kato T. (2009) Aberrant endoplasmic reticulum stress response in lymphoblastoid cells from patients with bipolar disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 12:33–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. He H, McColl K, Distelhorst CW. (2000) Involvement of c-Fos in signaling grp78 induction following ER calcium release. Oncogene 19:5936–5943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Hébert SS, De Strooper B. (2009) Alterations of the microRNA network cause neurodegenerative disease. Trends Neurosci 32:199–206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Hegde AN, Upadhya SC. (2011) Role of ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated proteolysis in nervous system disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1809:128–140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Heiseke A, Aguib Y, Riemer C, Baier M, Schätzl HM. (2009) Lithium induces clearance of protease resistant prion protein in prion-infected cells by induction of autophagy. J Neurochem 109:25–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Hendrick JP, Hartl FU. (1993) Molecular chaperone functions of heat-shock proteins. Annu Rev Biochem 62:349–384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Herrmann N, Lanctôt KL, Rothenburg LS, Eryavec G. (2007) A placebo-controlled trial of valproate for agitation and aggression in Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 23:116–119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Hickey MA, Chesselet MF. (2003) Apoptosis in Huntington’s disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 27:255–265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Hiroi T, Wei H, Hough C, Leeds P, Chuang DM. (2005) Protracted lithium treatment protects against the ER stress elicited by thapsigargin in rat PC12 cells: roles of intracellular calcium, GRP78 and Bcl-2. Pharmacogenomics J 5:102–111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Hodges A, Strand AD, Aragaki AK, Kuhn A, Sengstag T, Hughes G, Elliston LA, Hartog C, Goldstein DR, Thu D, et al. (2006) Regional and cellular gene expression changes in human Huntington’s disease brain. Hum Mol Genet 15:965–977 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Hong M, Chen DC, Klein PS, Lee VM. (1997) Lithium reduces tau phosphorylation by inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3. J Biol Chem 272:25326–25332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Hooper C, Killick R, Lovestone S. (2008) The GSK3 hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem 104:1433–1439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Hornstra IK, Nelson DL, Warren ST, Yang TP. (1993) High resolution methylation analysis of the FMR1 gene trinucleotide repeat region in fragile X syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 2:1659–1665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Hough C, Lu SJ, Davis CL, Chuang DM, Post RM. (1999) Elevated basal and thapsigargin-stimulated intracellular calcium of platelets and lymphocytes from bipolar affective disorder patients measured by a fluorometric microassay. Biol Psychiatry 46:247–255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Hsieh J, Nakashima K, Kuwabara T, Mejia E, Gage FH. (2004) Histone deacetylase inhibition-mediated neuronal differentiation of multipotent adult neural progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16659–16664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Hu JP, Xie JW, Wang CY, Wang T, Wang X, Wang SL, Teng WP, Wang ZY. (2011) Valproate reduces tau phosphorylation via cyclin-dependent kinase 5 and glycogen synthase kinase 3 signaling pathways. Brain Res Bull 85:194–200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Huang EJ, Reichardt LF. (2001) Neurotrophins: roles in neuronal development and function. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:677–736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Huang EJ, Reichardt LF. (2003) Trk receptors: roles in neuronal signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 72:609–642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Huang HC, Klein PS. (2006) Multiple roles for glycogen synthase kinase-3 as a drug target in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Drug Targets 7:1389–1397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Huang W, Galdzicki Z, van Gelderen P, Balbo A, Chikhale EG, Schapiro MB, Rapoport SI. (2000) Brain myo-inositol level is elevated in Ts65Dn mouse and reduced after lithium treatment. Neuroreport 11:445–448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Huang X, Wu DY, Chen G, Manji H, Chen DF. (2003) Support of retinal ganglion cell survival and axon regeneration by lithium through a Bcl-2-dependent mechanism. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:347–354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Huelsken J, Behrens J. (2002) The Wnt signalling pathway. J Cell Sci 115:3977–3978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Hunsberger JG, Austin DR, Chen G, Manji HK. (2009) Cellular mechanisms underlying affective resiliency: the role of glucocorticoid receptor- and mitochondrially-mediated plasticity. Brain Res 1293:76–84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Hunsberger JG, Fessler EB, Wang Z, Elkahloun AG, Chuang DM. (2012) Post-insult valproic acid-regulated microRNAs: potential targets for cerebral ischemia. Am J Transl Res 4:316–332 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Inestrosa NC, Alvarez A, Godoy J, Reyes A, De Ferrari GV. (2000) Acetylcholinesterase-amyloid-beta-peptide interaction and Wnt signaling involvement in Abeta neurotoxicity. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 176:53–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Inui M, Martello G, Piccolo S. (2010) MicroRNA control of signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:252–263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Ishii T, Hashimoto E, Ukai W, Tateno M, Yoshinaga T, Saito S, Sohma H, Saito T. (2008) Lithium-induced suppression of transcription repressor NRSF/REST: effects on the dysfunction of neuronal differentiation by ethanol. Eur J Pharmacol 593:36–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Isojärvi J. (2008) Disorders of reproduction in patients with epilepsy: antiepileptic drug related mechanisms. Seizure 17:111–119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Jacinto E, Facchinetti V, Liu D, Soto N, Wei S, Jung SY, Huang Q, Qin J, Su B. (2006) SIN1/MIP1 maintains rictor-mTOR complex integrity and regulates Akt phosphorylation and substrate specificity. Cell 127:125–137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Jana NR, Tanaka M, Wang GH, Nukina N. (2000) Polyglutamine length-dependent interaction of Hsp40 and Hsp70 family chaperones with truncated N-terminal huntingtin: their role in suppression of aggregation and cellular toxicity. Hum Mol Genet 9:2009–2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Jiang Y, Lv H, Liao M, Xu X, Huang S, Tan H, Peng T, Zhang Y, Li H. (2012) GRP78 counteracts cell death and protein aggregation caused by mutant huntingtin proteins. Neurosci Lett 516:182–187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Jin G, Bausch D, Knightly T, Liu Z, Li Y, Liu B, Lu J, Chong W, Velmahos GC, Alam HB. (2011) Histone deacetylase inhibitors enhance endothelial cell sprouting angiogenesis in vitro. Surgery 150:429–435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Jin K, Zhu Y, Sun Y, Mao XO, Xie L, Greenberg DA. (2002) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulates neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11946–11950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Jope RS. (1999) Anti-bipolar therapy: mechanism of action of lithium. Mol Psychiatry 4:117–128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. Jope RS. (2003) Lithium and GSK-3: one inhibitor, two inhibitory actions, multiple outcomes. Trends Pharmacol Sci 24:441–443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Jope RS (2011) Glycogen synthase kinase-3 in the etiology and treatment of mood disorders. Fron Mol Neurosci 4:16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  228. Jope RS, Johnson GV. (2004) The glamour and gloom of glycogen synthase kinase-3. Trends Biochem Sci 29:95–102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Jope RS, Roh MS. (2006) Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) in psychiatric diseases and therapeutic interventions. Curr Drug Targets 7:1421–1434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Jope RS, Yuskaitis CJ, Beurel E. (2007) Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3): inflammation, diseases, and therapeutics. Neurochem Res 32:577–595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Joyce N, Annett G, Wirthlin L, Olson S, Bauer G, Nolta JA. (2010) Mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of neurodegenerative disease. Regen Med 5:933–946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Kaidanovich-Beilin O, Lipina TV, Takao K, van Eede M, Hattori S, Laliberte C, Khan M, Okamoto K, Chambers JW, Fletcher PJ, et al. (2009) Abnormalities in brain structure and behavior in GSK-3alpha mutant mice. Mol Brain 2:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Kaidanovich-Beilin O, Milman A, Weizman A, Pick CG, Eldar-Finkelman H. (2004) Rapid antidepressive-like activity of specific glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibitor and its effect on beta-catenin in mouse hippocampus. Biol Psychiatry 55:781–784 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  234. Kalasapudi VD, Sheftel G, Divish MM, Papolos DF, Lachman HM. (1990) Lithium augments fos protoonocogene expression in PC12 pheochromocytoma cells: implications for therapeutic action of lithium. Brain Res 521:47–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Kang K, Kim YJ, Kim YH, Roh JN, Nam JM, Kim PY, Ryu WS, Lee SH, Yoon BW. (2012) Lithium pretreatment reduces brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage in rats. Neurol Res 34:447–454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. Karege F, Perroud N, Burkhardt S, Fernandez R, Ballmann E, La Harpe R, Malafosse A. (2011) Alterations in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity and PTEN phosphatase in the prefrontal cortex of depressed suicide victims. Neuropsychobiology 63:224–231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Karege F, Perroud N, Burkhardt S, Schwald M, Ballmann E, La Harpe R, Malafosse A. (2007) Alteration in kinase activity but not in protein levels of protein kinase B and glycogen synthase kinase-3beta in ventral prefrontal cortex of depressed suicide victims. Biol Psychiatry 61:240–245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Karp JM, Leng Teo GS. (2009) Mesenchymal stem cell homing: the devil is in the details. Cell Stem Cell 4:206–216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  239. Katayama T, Imaizumi K, Sato N, Miyoshi K, Kudo T, Hitomi J, Morihara T, Yoneda T, Gomi F, Mori Y, et al. (1999) Presenilin-1 mutations downregulate the signalling pathway of the unfolded-protein response. Nat Cell Biol 1:479–485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Kaufman RJ. (1999) Stress signaling from the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum: coordination of gene transcriptional and translational controls. Genes Dev 13:1211–1233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Ke Q, Costa M. (2006) Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1). Mol Pharmacol 70:1469–1480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Kells AP, Fong DM, Dragunow M, During MJ, Young D, Connor B. (2004) AAV-mediated gene delivery of BDNF or GDNF is neuroprotective in a model of Huntington disease. Mol Ther 9:682–688 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. Kessing LV, Søndergård L, Forman JL, Andersen PK. (2008) Lithium treatment and risk of dementia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65:1331–1335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Khairova R, Pawar R, Salvadore G, Juruena MF, de Sousa RT, Soeiro-de-Souza MG, Salvador M, Zarate CA, Gattaz WF, Machado-Vieira R. (2012) Effects of lithium on oxidative stress parameters in healthy subjects. Mol Med Report 5:680–682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  245. Kidd SK, Schneider JS. (2010) Protection of dopaminergic cells from MPP+-mediated toxicity by histone deacetylase inhibition. Brain Res 1354:172–178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Kidd SK, Schneider JS. (2011) Protective effects of valproic acid on the nigrostriatal dopamine system in a 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience 194:189–194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Kilgore M, Miller CA, Fass DM, Hennig KM, Haggarty SJ, Sweatt JD, Rumbaugh G. (2010) Inhibitors of class 1 histone deacetylases reverse contextual memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:870–880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  248. Kim AH, Reimers M, Maher B, Williamson V, McMichael O, McClay JL, van den Oord EJ, Riley BP, Kendler KS, Vladimirov VI. (2010) MicroRNA expression profiling in the prefrontal cortex of individuals affected with schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. Schizophr Res 124:183–191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  249. Kim HJ, Leeds P, Chuang DM. (2009) The HDAC inhibitor, sodium butyrate, stimulates neurogenesis in the ischemic brain. J Neurochem 110:1226–1240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  250. Kim HJ, Rowe M, Ren M, Hong JS, Chen PS, Chuang DM. (2007) Histone deacetylase inhibitors exhibit anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects in a rat permanent ischemic model of stroke: multiple mechanisms of action. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 321:892–901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  251. Kim YH, Rane A, Lussier S, Andersen JK. (2011) Lithium protects against oxidative stress-mediated cell death in α-synuclein-overexpressing in vitro and in vivo models of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci Res 89:1666–1675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  252. Kim YR, van Meer MP, Tejima E, Murata Y, Mandeville JB, Dai G, Chuang DM, Rosen BR, Lo EH. (2008) Functional MRI of delayed chronic lithium treatment in rat focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke 39:439–447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  253. King TD, Bijur GN, Jope RS. (2001) Caspase-3 activation induced by inhibition of mitochondrial complex I is facilitated by glycogen synthase kinase-3beta and attenuated by lithium. Brain Res 919:106–114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  254. Kirshenboim N, Plotkin B, Shlomo SB, Kaidanovich-Beilin O, and Eldar-Finkelman H (2004) Lithium-mediated phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta involves PI3 kinase-dependent activation of protein kinase C-alpha. J Mol Neurosc 24:237–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  255. Klein PS, Melton DA. (1996) A molecular mechanism for the effect of lithium on development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:8455–8459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  256. Kleindorfer D, Lindsell CJ, Brass L, Koroshetz W, Broderick JP. (2008) National US estimates of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator use: ICD-9 codes substantially underestimate. Stroke 39:924–928 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  257. Klepac N, Relja M, Klepac R, Hećimović S, Babić T, Trkulja V. (2007) Oxidative stress parameters in plasma of Huntington’s disease patients, asymptomatic Huntington’s disease gene carriers and healthy subjects : a cross-sectional study. J Neurol 254:1676–1683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  258. Klionsky DJ, Emr SD. (2000) Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science 290:1717–1721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  259. Koenig S, Gerstner T, Keller A, Teich M, Longin E, Dempfle CE. (2008) High incidence of vaproate-induced coagulation disorders in children receiving valproic acid: a prospective study. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 19:375–382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  260. Koenig SA, Buesing D, Longin E,, Oehring R, Haussermann P, Kluger G, Lindmayer F, Hanusch R, Degen I, Kuhn H, et al. (2006) Valproic acid-induced hepatopathy: nine new fatalities in Germany from 1994 to 2003. Epilepsia 47:2027–2031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  261. Koh SH, Yoo AR, Chang DI, Hwang SJ, Kim SH. (2008) Inhibition of GSK-3 reduces infarct volume and improves neurobehavioral functions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 371:894–899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  262. Kornack DR, Rakic P. (2001) The generation, migration, and differentiation of olfactory neurons in the adult primate brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4752–4757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  263. Kostrouchová M, Kostrouch Z, Kostrouchová M. (2007) Valproic acid, a molecular lead to multiple regulatory pathways. Folia Biol (Praha) 53:37–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  264. Krupnik VE, Sharp JD, Jiang C, Robison K, Chickering TW, Amaravadi L, Brown DE, Guyot D, Mays G, Leiby K, et al. (1999) Functional and structural diversity of the human Dickkopf gene family. Gene 238:301–313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  265. Kuloglu M, Ustundag B, Atmaca M, Canatan H, Tezcan AE, Cinkilinc N. (2002) Lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme levels in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Cell Biochem Funct 20:171–175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  266. Kumar A, Zloza A, Moon RT, Watts J, Tenorio AR, Al-Harthi L. (2008) Active beta-catenin signaling is an inhibitory pathway for human immunodeficiency virus replication in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Virol 82:2813–2820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  267. Kunst CB, Messer L, Gordon J, Haines J, Patterson D. (2000) Genetic mapping of a mouse modifier gene that can prevent ALS onset. Genomics 70:181–189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  268. Laeng P, Pitts RL, Lemire AL, Drabik CE, Weiner A, Tang H, Thyagarajan R, Mallon BS, Altar CA. (2004) The mood stabilizer valproic acid stimulates GABA neurogenesis from rat forebrain stem cells. J Neurochem 91:238–251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  269. Lai EC. (2002) Micro RNAs are complementary to 3′ UTR sequence motifs that mediate negative post-transcriptional regulation. Nat Genet 30:363–364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  270. Lai JS, Zhao C, Warsh JJ, Li PP. (2006) Cytoprotection by lithium and valproate varies between cell types and cellular stresses. Eur J Pharmacol 539:18–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  271. Lee J, Giordano S, Zhang J. (2012a) Autophagy, mitochondria and oxidative stress: cross-talk and redox signalling. Biochem J 441:523–540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  272. Lee JY, Kim HS, Choi HY, Oh TH, Ju BG, Yune TY. (2012b) Valproic acid attenuates blood-spinal cord barrier disruption by inhibiting matrix metalloprotease-9 activity and improves functional recovery after spinal cord injury. J Neurochem 121:818–829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  273. Lee VM, Goedert M, Trojanowski JQ. (2001) Neurodegenerative tauopathies. Annu Rev Neurosci 24:1121–1159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  274. Lefebvre S, Bürglen L, Reboullet S, Clermont O, Burlet P, Viollet L, Benichou B, Cruaud C, Millasseau P, Zeviani M, et al. (1995) Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. Cell 80:155–165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  275. Leng Y, Liang MH, Ren M, Marinova Z, Leeds P, Chuang DM. (2008) Synergistic neuroprotective effects of lithium and valproic acid or other histone deacetylase inhibitors in neurons: roles of glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibition. J Neurosci 28:2576–2588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  276. Leonard DP, Kidson MA, Brown JG, Shannon PJ, Taryan S. (1975) A double blind trial of lithium carbonate and haloperidol in Huntington’s chorea. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 9:115–118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  277. Leonard DP, Kidson MA, Shannon PJ, Brown J. (1974) Letter: Double-blind trial of lithium carbonate and haloperidol in Huntington’s chorea. Lancet 2:1208–1209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  278. Leroy K, Ando K, Héraud C, Yilmaz Z, Authelet M, Boeynaems JM, Buée L, De Decker R, Brion JP. (2010) Lithium treatment arrests the development of neurofibrillary tangles in mutant tau transgenic mice with advanced neurofibrillary pathology. J Alzheimers Dis 19:705–719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  279. Levine B, Kroemer G. (2008) Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell 132:27–42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  280. Levine MS, Klapstein GJ, Koppel A, Gruen E, Cepeda C, Vargas ME, Jokel ES, Carpenter EM, Zanjani H, Hurst RS, et al. (1999) Enhanced sensitivity to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activation in transgenic and knockin mouse models of Huntington’s disease. J Neurosci Res 58:515–532 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  281. Leyhe T, Eschweiler GW, Stransky E, Gasser T, Annas P, Basun H, Laske C. (2009) Increase of BDNF serum concentration in lithium treated patients with early Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 16:649–656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  282. Li H, Li Q, Du X, Sun Y, Wang X, Kroemer G, Blomgren K, Zhu C. (2011) Lithium-mediated long-term neuroprotection in neonatal rat hypoxia-ischemia is associated with antiinflammatory effects and enhanced proliferation and survival of neural stem/progenitor cells. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 31:2106–2115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  283. Li Q, Li H, Roughton K, Wang X, Kroemer G, Blomgren K and Zhu C (2010a) Lithium reduces apoptosis and autophagy after neonatal hypoxia-ischemia. Cell death & disease 1:e56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  284. Li X, Friedman AB, Zhu W, Wang L, Boswell S, May RS, Davis LL, Jope RS. (2007) Lithium regulates glycogen synthase kinase-3beta in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells: implication in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 61:216–222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  285. Li X, Jope RS. (2010) Is glycogen synthase kinase-3 a central modulator in mood regulation? Neuropsychopharmacology 35:2143–2154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  286. Li X, Liu M, Cai Z, Wang G, Li X. (2010b) Regulation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 during bipolar mania treatment. Bipolar Disord 12:741–752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  287. Li XJ, Li S. (2011) Proteasomal dysfunction in aging and Huntington disease. Neurobiol Dis 43:4–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  288. Liang ZQ, Wang X, Li LY, Wang Y, Chen RW, Chuang DM, Chase TN, Qin ZH. (2007) Nuclear factor-kappaB-dependent cyclin D1 induction and DNA replication associated with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated apoptosis in rat striatum. J Neurosci Res 85:1295–1309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  289. Liang ZQ, Wang XX, Wang Y, Chuang DM, DiFiglia M, Chase TN, Qin ZH. (2005) Susceptibility of striatal neurons to excitotoxic injury correlates with basal levels of Bcl-2 and the induction of P53 and c-Myc immunoreactivity. Neurobiol Dis 20:562–573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  290. Liu XS, Chopp M, Kassis H, Jia LF, Hozeska-Solgot A, Zhang RL, Chen C, Cui YS, Zhang ZG. (2012a) Valproic acid increases white matter repair and neurogenesis after stroke. Neuroscience 220:313–321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  291. Liu Y, Chen G, Ma C, Bower KA, Xu M, Fan Z, Shi X, Ke ZJ, Luo J. (2009) Overexpression of glycogen synthase kinase 3beta sensitizes neuronal cells to ethanol toxicity. J Neurosci Res 87:2793–2802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  292. Liu ZH, Chuang DM, Smith CB. (2011) Lithium ameliorates phenotypic deficits in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 14:618–630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  293. Liu ZH, Huang T, Smith CB. (2012b) Lithium reverses increased rates of cerebral protein synthesis in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome. Neurobiol Dis 45:1145–1152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  294. Lovestone S, Reynolds CH, Latimer D, Davis DR, Anderton BH, Gallo JM, Hanger D, Mulot S, Marquardt B, Stabel S, et al. (1994) Alzheimer’s disease-like phosphorylation of the microtubule-associated protein tau by glycogen synthase kinase-3 in transfected mammalian cells. Curr Biol 4:1077–1086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  295. Lunn JS, Sakowski SA, Hur J, Feldman EL. (2011) Stem cell technology for neurodegenerative diseases. Ann Neurol 70:353–361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  296. Luo GR, Le WD. (2010) Collective roles of molecular chaperones in protein degradation pathways associated with neurodegenerative diseases. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 11:180–187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  297. Luo J (2010) Lithium-mediated protection against ethanol neurotoxicity. Front Neurosci 4:41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  298. Lv L, Han X, Sun Y, Wang X, Dong Q. (2012) Valproic acid improves locomotion in vivo after SCI and axonal growth of neurons in vitro. Exp Neurol 233:783–790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  299. Lv L, Sun Y, Han X, Xu CC, Tang YP, Dong Q. (2011) Valproic acid improves outcome after rodent spinal cord injury: potential roles of histone deacetylase inhibition. Brain Res 1396:60–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  300. Lyoo IK, Dager SR, Kim JE, Yoon SJ, Friedman SD, Dunner DL, Renshaw PF. (2010) Lithium-induced gray matter volume increase as a neural correlate of treatment response in bipolar disorder: a longitudinal brain imaging study. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:1743–1750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  301. Ma J, Zhang GY. (2003) Lithium reduced N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 2A tyrosine phosphorylation and its interactions with Src and Fyn mediated by PSD-95 in rat hippocampus following cerebral ischemia. Neurosci Lett 348:185–189 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  302. Ma Y, Hendershot LM. (2001) The unfolding tale of the unfolded protein response. Cell 107:827–830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  303. Macdonald A, Briggs K, Poppe M, Higgins A, Velayudhan L, Lovestone S. (2008) A feasibility and tolerability study of lithium in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 23:704–711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  304. Macdonald M, The Huntington’s Disease Collaborative Research Group (1993) A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell 72:971–983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  305. Macdonald RL, Kelly KM. (1995) Antiepileptic drug mechanisms of action. Epilepsia 36 (Suppl 2):S2–S12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  306. Machado-Vieira R, Andreazza AC, Viale CI, Zanatto V, Cereser V, Jr, da Silva Vargas R, Kapczinski F, Portela LV, Souza DO, Salvador M, et al. (2007) Oxidative stress parameters in unmedicated and treated bipolar subjects during initial manic episode: a possible role for lithium antioxidant effects. Neurosci Lett 421:33–36 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  307. Maggirwar SB, Tong N, Ramirez S, Gelbard HA, Dewhurst S. (1999) HIV-1 Tat-mediated activation of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta contributes to Tat-mediated neurotoxicity. J Neurochem 73:578–586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  308. Maler JM, Spitzer P, Lewczuk P, Kornhuber J, Herrmann M, Wiltfang J. (2006) Decreased circulating CD34+ stem cells in early Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence for a deficient hematopoietic brain support? Mol Psychiatry 11:1113–1115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  309. Malhi GS, Tanious M. (2011) Optimal frequency of lithium administration in the treatment of bipolar disorder: clinical and dosing considerations. CNS Drugs 25:289–298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  310. Malhi GS, Tanious M, Gershon S. (2011) The lithiumeter: a measured approach. Bipolar Disord 13:219–226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  311. Manyam NV, Bravo-Fernandez E. (1973) Lithium carbonate in Huntington’s chorea. Lancet 1:1010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  312. Margulies S, Hicks R, Combination Therapies for Traumatic Brain Injury Workshop Leaders (2009) Combination therapies for traumatic brain injury: prospective considerations. J Neurotrauma 26:925–939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  313. Marinova Z, Leng Y, Leeds P, Chuang DM. (2011) Histone deacetylase inhibition alters histone methylation associated with heat shock protein 70 promoter modifications in astrocytes and neurons. Neuropharmacology 60:1109–1115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  314. Marinova Z, Ren M, Wendland JR, Leng Y, Liang MH, Yasuda S, Leeds P, Chuang DM. (2009) Valproic acid induces functional heat-shock protein 70 via Class I histone deacetylase inhibition in cortical neurons: a potential role of Sp1 acetylation. J Neurochem 111:976–987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  315. Marmol F. (2008) Lithium: bipolar disorder and neurodegenerative diseases Possible cellular mechanisms of the therapeutic effects of lithium. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 32:1761–1771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  316. Martin JB, Gusella JF. (1986) Huntington’s disease. Pathogenesis and management. N Engl J Med 315:1267–1276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  317. Martin L, Magnaudeix A, Esclaire F, Yardin C, Terro F. (2009) Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta downregulates total tau proteins in cultured neurons and its reversal by the blockade of protein phosphatase-2A. Brain Res 1252:66–75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  318. Mattson MP, LaFerla FM, Chan SL, Leissring MA, Shepel PN, Geiger JD. (2000) Calcium signaling in the ER: its role in neuronal plasticity and neurodegenerative disorders. Trends Neurosci 23:222–229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  319. Mattsson B. (1973) Huntington’s chorea and lithium therapy. Lancet 1:718–719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  320. May PC, Lampert-Etchells M, Johnson SA, Poirier J, Masters JN, Finch CE. (1990) Dynamics of gene expression for a hippocampal glycoprotein elevated in Alzheimer’s disease and in response to experimental lesions in rat. Neuron 5:831–839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  321. McBride SM, Choi CH, Wang Y, Liebelt D, Braunstein E, Ferreiro D, Sehgal A, Siwicki KK, Dockendorff TC, Nguyen HT, et al. (2005) Pharmacological rescue of synaptic plasticity, courtship behavior, and mushroom body defects in a Drosophila model of fragile X syndrome. Neuron 45:753–764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  322. McClung CA, Nestler EJ. (2008) Neuroplasticity mediated by altered gene expression. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:3–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  323. McFarland R, Hudson G, Taylor RW, Green SH, Hodges S, McKiernan PJ, Chinnery PF, Ramesh V. (2008) Reversible valproate hepatotoxicity due to mutations in mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma (POLG1). Arch Dis Child 93:151–153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  324. McKnight RF, Adida M, Budge K, Stockton S, Goodwin GM, Geddes JR. (2012) Lithium toxicity profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 379:721–728 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  325. Meador KJ, Penovich P, Baker GA, Pennell PB, Bromfield E, Pack A, Liporace JD, Sam M, Kalayjian LA, Thurman DJ, et al. NEAD Study Group (2009) Antiepileptic drug use in women of childbearing age. Epilepsy Behav 15:339–343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  326. Meijer L, Flajolet M, Greengard P. (2004) Pharmacological inhibitors of glycogen synthase kinase 3. Trends Pharmacol Sci 25:471–480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  327. Mezey E, Chandross KJ, Harta G, Maki RA, McKercher SR. (2000) Turning blood into brain: cells bearing neuronal antigens generated in vivo from bone marrow. Science 290:1779–1782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  328. Michaelis M, Suhan T, Michaelis UR, Beek K, Rothweiler F, Tausch L, Werz O, Eikel D, Zornig M, Nau H, et al. (2006) Valproic acid induces extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 activation and inhibits apoptosis in endothelial cells. Cell Death Differ 13:446–453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  329. Miller RG, Moore DH, Forshew DA, Katz JS, Barohn RJ, Valan M, Bromberg MB, Goslin KL, Graves MC, McCluskey LF, et al. WALS Study Group (2011) Phase II screening trial of lithium carbonate in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: examining a more efficient trial design. Neurology 77:973–979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  330. Min WW, Yuskaitis CJ, Yan Q, Sikorski C, Chen S, Jope RS, Bauchwitz RP. (2009) Elevated glycogen synthase kinase-3 activity in Fragile X mice: key metabolic regulator with evidence for treatment potential. Neuropharmacology 56:463–472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  331. Mines MA and Jope RS (2011) Glycogen synthase kinase-3: a promising therapeutic target for fragile x syndrome. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience 4:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  332. Mines MA, Yuskaitis CJ, King MK, Beurel E, Jope RS. (2010) GSK3 influences social preference and anxiety-related behaviors during social interaction in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome and autism. PLoS ONE 5:e9706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  333. Monti B, Gatta V, Piretti F, Raffaelli SS, Virgili M, Contestabile A. (2010) Valproic acid is neuroprotective in the rotenone rat model of Parkinson’s disease: involvement of alpha-synuclein. Neurotox Res 17:130–141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  334. Moore GJ, Bebchuk JM, Hasanat K, Chen G, Seraji-Bozorgzad N, Wilds IB, Faulk MW, Koch S, Glitz DA, Jolkovsky L, et al. (2000a) Lithium increases N-acetyl-aspartate in the human brain: in vivo evidence in support of bcl-2’s neurotrophic effects? Biol Psychiatry 48:1–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  335. Moore GJ, Bebchuk JM, Wilds IB, Chen G, Manji HK. (2000b) Lithium-induced increase in human brain grey matter. Lancet 356:1241–1242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  336. Moore GJ, Cortese BM, Glitz DA, Zajac-Benitez C, Quiroz JA, Uhde TW, Drevets WC, Manji HK. (2009) A longitudinal study of the effects of lithium treatment on prefrontal and subgenual prefrontal gray matter volume in treatment-responsive bipolar disorder patients. J Clin Psychiatry 70:699–705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  337. Moreau MP, Bruse SE, David-Rus R, Buyske S, Brzustowicz LM. (2011) Altered microRNA expression profiles in postmortem brain samples from individuals with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 69:188–193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  338. Mudher A, Shepherd D, Newman TA, Mildren P, Jukes JP, Squire A, Mears A, Drummond JA, Berg S, MacKay D, et al. (2004) GSK-3beta inhibition reverses axonal transport defects and behavioural phenotypes in Drosophila. Mol Psychiatry 9:522–530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  339. Muñoz-Montaño JR, Lim F, Moreno FJ, Avila J, Díaz-Nido J. (1999) Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Modulates Neurite Outgrowth in Cultured Neurons: Possible Implications for Neurite Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis 1:361–378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  340. Muñoz-Montaño JR, Moreno FJ, Avila J, Diaz-Nido J. (1997) Lithium inhibits Alzheimer’s disease-like tau protein phosphorylation in neurons. FEBS Lett 411:183–188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  341. Nakao N, Brundin P, Funa K, Lindvall O, Odin P. (1995) Trophic and protective actions of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on striatal DARPP-32-containing neurons in vitro. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 90:92–101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  342. Nakashima H, Ishihara T, Suguimoto P, Yokota O, Oshima E, Kugo A, Terada S, Hamamura T, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM, et al. (2005) Chronic lithium treatment decreases tau lesions by promoting ubiquitination in a mouse model of tauopathies. Acta Neuropathol 110:547–556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  343. Neri LM, Borgatti P, Capitani S, Martelli AM. (2002) The nuclear phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT pathway: a new second messenger system. Biochim Biophys Acta 1584:73–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  344. Neth P, Ciccarella M, Egea V, Hoelters J, Jochum M, Ries C. (2006) Wnt signaling regulates the invasion capacity of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 24:1892–1903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  345. Newton SS, Collier EF, Hunsberger J, Adams D, Terwilliger R, Selvanayagam E, Duman RS. (2003) Gene profile of electroconvulsive seizures: induction of neurotrophic and angiogenic factors. J Neurosci 23:10841–10851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  346. Newton SS, Duman RS. (2004) Regulation of neurogenesis and angiogenesis in depression. Curr Neurovasc Res 1:261–267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  347. Ni M, Zhang Y, Lee AS. (2011) Beyond the endoplasmic reticulum: atypical GRP78 in cell viability, signalling and therapeutic targeting. Biochem J 434:181–188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  348. Nicholson KM, Anderson NG. (2002) The protein kinase B/Akt signalling pathway in human malignancy. Cell Signal 14:381–395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  349. Nijholt DA, De Kimpe L, Elfrink HL, Hoozemans JJ, Scheper W. (2011) Removing protein aggregates: the role of proteolysis in neurodegeneration. Curr Med Chem 18:2459–2476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  350. Noble W, Planel E, Zehr C, Olm V, Meyerson J, Suleman F, Gaynor K, Wang L, LaFrancois J, Feinstein B, et al. (2005) Inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 by lithium correlates with reduced tauopathy and degeneration in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:6990–6995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  351. Nocjar C, Hammonds MD, Shim SS. (2007) Chronic lithium treatment magnifies learning in rats. Neuroscience 150:774–788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  352. Nonaka S, Chuang DM. (1998) Neuroprotective effects of chronic lithium on focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Neuroreport 9:2081–2084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  353. Nunes PV, Forlenza OV, Gattaz WF. (2007) Lithium and risk for Alzheimer’s disease in elderly patients with bipolar disorder. Br J Psychiatry 190:359–360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  354. Nuutinen T, Suuronen T, Kauppinen A, Salminen A. (2009) Clusterin: a forgotten player in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 61:89–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  355. Nuutinen T, Suuronen T, Kauppinen A, Salminen A. (2010) Valproic acid stimulates clusterin expression in human astrocytes: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 475:64–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  356. O’Brien WT, Harper AD, Jové F, Woodgett JR, Maretto S, Piccolo S, Klein PS. (2004) Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta haploinsufficiency mimics the behavioral and molecular effects of lithium. J Neurosci 24:6791–6798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  357. Ohgami H, Terao T, Shiotsuki I, Ishii N, Iwata N. (2009) Lithium levels in drinking water and risk of suicide. Br J Psychiatry 194:464–465, discussion 446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  358. Omata N, Chiu CT, Moya PR, Leng Y, Wang Z, Hunsberger JG, Leeds P, Chuang DM. (2011) Lentivirally mediated GSK-3β silencing in the hippocampal dentate gyrus induces antidepressant-like effects in stressed mice. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 14:711–717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  359. Omata N, Murata T, Takamatsu S, Maruoka N, Mitsuya H, Yonekura Y, Fujibayashi Y, Wada Y. (2008) Neuroprotective effect of chronic lithium treatment against hypoxia in specific brain regions with upregulation of cAMP response element binding protein and brain-derived neurotrophic factor but not nerve growth factor: comparison with acute lithium treatment. Bipolar Disord 10:360–368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  360. Ornoy A. (2009) Valproic acid in pregnancy: how much are we endangering the embryo and fetus? Reprod Toxicol 28:1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  361. Ozaki N, Chuang DM. (1997) Lithium increases transcription factor binding to AP-1 and cyclic AMP-responsive element in cultured neurons and rat brain. J Neurochem 69:2336–2344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  362. Pan T, Li X, Xie W, Jankovic J, Le W. (2005) Valproic acid-mediated Hsp70 induction and anti-apoptotic neuroprotection in SH-SY5Y cells. FEBS Lett 579:6716–6720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  363. Paratcha G, Ledda F. (2008) GDNF and GFRalpha: a versatile molecular complex for developing neurons. Trends Neurosci 31:384–391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  364. Pardo R, Andreolotti AG, Ramos B, Picatoste F, Claro E. (2003) Opposed effects of lithium on the MEK-ERK pathway in neural cells: inhibition in astrocytes and stimulation in neurons by GSK3 independent mechanisms. J Neurochem 87:417–426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  365. Park HJ, Kang WS, Paik JW, and Kim JW (2012) Effect of valproic acid through regulation of NMDA receptor-ERK signaling in sleep deprivation rats. J Mol Neurosci 47:554–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  366. Penas C, Verdú E, Asensio-Pinilla E, Guzmán-Lenis MS, Herrando-Grabulosa M, Navarro X, Casas C. (2011) Valproate reduces CHOP levels and preserves oligodendrocytes and axons after spinal cord injury. Neuroscience 178:33–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  367. Peng GS, Li G, Tzeng NS, Chen PS, Chuang DM, Hsu YD, Yang S, Hong JS. (2005) Valproate pretreatment protects dopaminergic neurons from LPS-induced neurotoxicity in rat primary midbrain cultures: role of microglia. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 134:162–169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  368. Pérez M, Hernández F, Lim F, Díaz-Nido J, Avila J. (2003) Chronic lithium treatment decreases mutant tau protein aggregation in a transgenic mouse model. J Alzheimers Dis 5:301–308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  369. Perova T, Wasserman MJ, Li PP, Warsh JJ. (2008) Hyperactive intracellular calcium dynamics in B lymphoblasts from patients with bipolar I disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 11:185–196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  370. Perry G, Cash AD, Smith MA. (2002) Alzheimer Disease and Oxidative Stress. J Biomed Biotechnol 2:120–123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  371. Phiel CJ, Klein PS. (2001) Molecular targets of lithium action. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 41:789–813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  372. Phiel CJ, Wilson CA, Lee VM, Klein PS. (2003) GSK-3alpha regulates production of Alzheimer’s disease amyloid-beta peptides. Nature 423:435–439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  373. Phiel CJ, Zhang F, Huang EY, Guenther MG, Lazar MA, Klein PS. (2001) Histone deacetylase is a direct target of valproic acid, a potent anticonvulsant, mood stabilizer, and teratogen. J Biol Chem 276:36734–36741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  374. Piepers S, Veldink JH, de Jong SW, van der Tweel I, van der Pol WL, Uijtendaal EV, Schelhaas HJ, Scheffer H, de Visser M, de Jong JM, et al. (2009) Randomized sequential trial of valproic acid in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol 66:227–234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  375. Pizzasegola C, Caron I, Daleno C, Ronchi A, Minoia C, Carrì MT, Bendotti C. (2009) Treatment with lithium carbonate does not improve disease progression in two different strains of SOD1 mutant mice. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 10:221–228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  376. Planel E, Yasutake K, Fujita SC, Ishiguro K. (2001) Inhibition of protein phosphatase 2A overrides tau protein kinase I/glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta and cyclin-dependent kinase 5 inhibition and results in tau hyperphosphorylation in the hippocampus of starved mouse. J Biol Chem 276:34298–34306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  377. Profenno LA, Jakimovich L, Holt CJ, Porsteinsson A, Tariot PN. (2005) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial of safety and tolerability of two doses of divalproex sodium in outpatients with probable Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Alzheimer Res 2:553–558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  378. Qian YR, Lee MJ, Hwang S, Kook JH, Kim JK, Bae CS. (2010) Neuroprotection by valproic Acid in mouse models of permanent and transient focal cerebral ischemia. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 14:435–440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  379. Qing H, He G, Ly PT, Fox CJ, Staufenbiel M, Cai F, Zhang Z, Wei S, Sun X, Chen CH, et al. (2008) Valproic acid inhibits Abeta production, neuritic plaque formation, and behavioral deficits in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. J Exp Med 205:2781–2789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  380. Quiroz JA, Gould TD, Manji HK. (2004) Molecular effects of lithium. Mol Interv 4:259–272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  381. Quiroz JA, Machado-Vieira R, Zarate CA, Jr, Manji HK. (2010) Novel insights into lithium’s mechanism of action: neurotrophic and neuroprotective effects. Neuropsychobiology 62:50–60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  382. Rametti A, Esclaire F, Yardin C, Cogné N, Terro F. (2008) Lithium down-regulates tau in cultured cortical neurons: a possible mechanism of neuroprotection. Neurosci Lett 434:93–98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  383. Rametti A, Esclaire F, Yardin C, Terro F. (2004) Linking alterations in tau phosphorylation and cleavage during neuronal apoptosis. J Biol Chem 279:54518–54528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  384. Rao JS and Rapoport SI (2009) Mood-stabilizers target the brain arachidonic acid cascade. Curr Mol Pharmacol 2:207–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  385. Ravagnan L, Gurbuxani S, Susin SA, Maisse C, Daugas E, Zamzami N, Mak T, Jaattela M, Penninger JM, Garrido C, et al. (2001) Heat-shock protein 70 antagonizes apoptosis-inducing factor. Nat Cell Biol 3:839–843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  386. Ravikumar B, Vacher C, Berger Z, Davies JE, Luo S, Oroz LG, Scaravilli F, Easton DF, Duden R, O'Kane CJ, et al. (2004) Inhibition of mTOR induces autophagy and reduces toxicity of polyglutamine expansions in fly and mouse models of Huntington disease. Nat Genet 36:585–595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  387. Ren M, Leng Y, Jeong M, Leeds PR, Chuang DM. (2004) Valproic acid reduces brain damage induced by transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats: potential roles of histone deacetylase inhibition and heat shock protein induction. J Neurochem 89:1358–1367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  388. Ren M, Senatorov VV, Chen RW, Chuang DM. (2003) Postinsult treatment with lithium reduces brain damage and facilitates neurological recovery in a rat ischemia/reperfusion model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:6210–6215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  389. Ricobaraza A, Cuadrado-Tejedor M, Marco S, Pérez-Otaño I, García-Osta A. (2012) Phenylbutyrate rescues dendritic spine loss associated with memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. Hippocampus 22:1040–1050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  390. Rochette CF, Surh LC, Ray PN, McAndrew PE, Prior TW, Burghes AH, Vanasse M, Simard LR. (1997) Molecular diagnosis of non-deletion SMA patients using quantitative PCR of SMN exon 7. Neurogenetics 1:141–147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  391. Rockenstein E, Torrance M, Adame A, Mante M, Bar-on P, Rose JB, Crews L, Masliah E. (2007) Neuroprotective effects of regulators of the glycogen synthase kinase-3beta signaling pathway in a transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease are associated with reduced amyloid precursor protein phosphorylation. J Neurosci 27:1981–1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  392. Roedding AS, Gao AF, Au-Yeung W, Scarcelli T, Li PP, Warsh JJ. (2012) Effect of oxidative stress on TRPM2 and TRPC3 channels in B lymphoblast cells in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 14:151–161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  393. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, Carnethon MR, Dai S, de Simone G, Ford ES, et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee (2011) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 123:e18–e209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  394. Roh MS, Eom TY, Zmijewska AA, De Sarno P, Roth KA, Jope RS. (2005) Hypoxia activates glycogen synthase kinase-3 in mouse brain in vivo: protection by mood stabilizers and imipramine. Biol Psychiatry 57:278–286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  395. Rong H, Liu TB, Yang KJ, Yang HC, Wu DH, Liao CP, Hong F, Yang HZ, Wan F, Ye XY, et al. (2011) MicroRNA-134 plasma levels before and after treatment for bipolar mania. J Psychiatr Res 45:92–95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  396. Rosa AO, Kaster MP, Binfare RW, Morales S, Martin-Aparicio E, Navarro-Rico ML, Martinez A, Medina M, Garcia AG, Lopez MG, et al. (2008) Antidepressant-like effect of the novel thiadiazolidinone NP031115 in mice. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 32:1549–1556 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  397. Rosell A, Lo EH. (2008) Multiphasic roles for matrix metalloproteinases after stroke. Curr Opin Pharmacol 8:82–89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  398. Rosen DR, Siddique T, Patterson D, Figlewicz DA, Sapp P, Hentati A, Donaldson D, Goto J, O'Regan JP, Deng HX. (1993) Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature 362:59–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  399. Ross CA, Poirier MA. (2005) Opinion: What is the role of protein aggregation in neurodegeneration? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:891–898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  400. Ross CA, Tabrizi SJ. (2011) Huntington’s disease: from molecular pathogenesis to clinical treatment. Lancet Neurol 10:83–98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  401. Rouaux C, Jokic N, Mbebi C, Boutillier S, Loeffler JP, Boutillier AL. (2003) Critical loss of CBP/p300 histone acetylase activity by caspase-6 during neurodegeneration. EMBO J 22:6537–6549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  402. Rouaux C, Panteleeva I, René F, Gonzalez de Aguilar JL, Echaniz-Laguna A, Dupuis L, Menger Y, Boutillier AL, Loeffler JP. (2007) Sodium valproate exerts neuroprotective effects in vivo through CREB-binding protein-dependent mechanisms but does not improve survival in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse model. J Neurosci 27:5535–5545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  403. Rowe MK, Chuang DM. (2004) Lithium neuroprotection: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Expert Rev Mol Med 6:1–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  404. Rowe MK, Wiest C, Chuang DM. (2007) GSK-3 is a viable potential target for therapeutic intervention in bipolar disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 31:920–931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  405. Rowland LP. (1994) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 7:310–315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  406. Rubinsztein DC, Gestwicki JE, Murphy LO, Klionsky DJ. (2007) Potential therapeutic applications of autophagy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 6:304–312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  407. Saft C, Lauter T, Kraus PH, Przuntek H, Andrich JE. (2006) Dose-dependent improvement of myoclonic hyperkinesia due to Valproic acid in eight Huntington’s Disease patients: a case series. BMC Neurol 6:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  408. Saito M, Chakraborty G, Mao RF, Paik SM, Vadasz C, Saito M. (2010) Tau phosphorylation and cleavage in ethanol-induced neurodegeneration in the developing mouse brain. Neurochem Res 35:651–659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  409. Salmena L, Poliseno L, Tay Y, Kats L, Pandolfi PP. (2011) A ceRNA hypothesis: the Rosetta Stone of a hidden RNA language? Cell 146:353–358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  410. Sang H, Lu Z, Li Y, Ru B, Wang W, Chen J. (2001) Phosphorylation of tau by glycogen synthase kinase 3beta in intact mammalian cells influences the stability of microtubules. Neurosci Lett 312:141–144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  411. Santarelli DM, Beveridge NJ, Tooney PA, Cairns MJ. (2011) Upregulation of dicer and microRNA expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex Brodmann area 46 in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 69:180–187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  412. Sarkar S, Floto RA, Berger Z, Imarisio S, Cordenier A, Pasco M, Cook LJ, Rubinsztein DC. (2005) Lithium induces autophagy by inhibiting inositol monophosphatase. J Cell Biol 170:1101–1111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  413. Sarkar S, Krishna G, Imarisio S, Saiki S, O’Kane CJ, Rubinsztein DC. (2008) A rational mechanism for combination treatment of Huntington’s disease using lithium and rapamycin. Hum Mol Genet 17:170–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  414. Sarkar S, Rubinsztein DC. (2006) Inositol and IP3 levels regulate autophagy: biology and therapeutic speculations. Autophagy 2:132–134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  415. Sassi RB, Brambilla P, Hatch JP, Nicoletti MA, Mallinger AG, Frank E, Kupfer DJ, Keshavan MS, Soares JC. (2004) Reduced left anterior cingulate volumes in untreated bipolar patients. Biol Psychiatry 56:467–475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  416. Sassi RB, Nicoletti M, Brambilla P, Mallinger AG, Frank E, Kupfer DJ, Keshavan MS, Soares JC. (2002) Increased gray matter volume in lithium-treated bipolar disorder patients. Neurosci Lett 329:243–245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  417. Saudou F, Finkbeiner S, Devys D, Greenberg ME. (1998) Huntingtin acts in the nucleus to induce apoptosis but death does not correlate with the formation of intranuclear inclusions. Cell 95:55–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  418. Savas HA, Gergerlioglu HS, Armutcu F, Herken H, Yilmaz HR, Kocoglu E, Selek S, Tutkun H, Zoroglu SS, Akyol O. (2006) Elevated serum nitric oxide and superoxide dismutase in euthymic bipolar patients: impact of past episodes. World J Biol Psychiatry 7:51–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  419. Savory J, Herman MM, Ghribi O. (2003) Intracellular mechanisms underlying aluminum-induced apoptosis in rabbit brain. J Inorg Biochem 97:151–154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  420. Scali C, Caraci F, Gianfriddo M, Diodato E, Roncarati R, Pollio G, Gaviraghi G, Copani A, Nicoletti F, Terstappen GC, et al. (2006) Inhibition of Wnt signaling, modulation of Tau phosphorylation and induction of neuronal cell death by DKK1. Neurobiol Dis 24:254–265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  421. Schenk G, Leijnse-Ybema HJ. (1974) Letter: Huntington’s chorea and levodopa. Lancet 1:364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  422. Schilling G, Becher MW, Sharp AH, Jinnah HA, Duan K, Kotzuk JA, Slunt HH, Ratovitski T, Cooper JK, Jenkins NA, et al. (1999) Intranuclear inclusions and neuritic aggregates in transgenic mice expressing a mutant N-terminal fragment of huntingtin. Hum Mol Genet 8:397–407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  423. Schratt GM, Tuebing F, Nigh EA, Kane CG, Sabatini ME, Kiebler M, Greenberg ME. (2006) A brain-specific microRNA regulates dendritic spine development. Nature 439:283–289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  424. Schuettauf F, Rejdak R, Thaler S, Bolz S, Lehaci C, Mankowska A, Zarnowski T, Junemann A, Zagorski Z, Zrenner E, et al. (2006) Citicoline and lithium rescue retinal ganglion cells following partial optic nerve crush in the rat. Exp Eye Res 83:1128–1134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  425. Schwarcz R, Whetsell WO., Jr (1982) Post-mortem high affinity glutamate uptake in human brain. Neuroscience 7:1771–1778 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  426. Seidensticker MJ, Behrens J. (2000) Biochemical interactions in the wnt pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta 1495:168–182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  427. Selkoe DJ. (2001) Alzheimer’s disease: genes, proteins, and therapy. Physiol Rev 81:741–766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  428. Senatorov VV, Chuang DM. (2007) Lithium protects against quinolinic-acid excitotoxicity in rat cortico-striatal organotypic culture. Int J Neuroprotect Neuroregen 3:122–132 [Google Scholar]
  429. Senatorov VV, Ren M, Kanai H, Wei H, Chuang DM. (2004) Short-term lithium treatment promotes neuronal survival and proliferation in rat striatum infused with quinolinic acid, an excitotoxic model of Huntington’s disease. Mol Psychiatry 9:371–385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  430. Serdaroglu G, Tütüncüoglu S, Kavakli K, Tekgül H. (2002) Coagulation abnormalities and acquired von Willebrand’s disease type 1 in children receiving valproic acid. J Child Neurol 17:41–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  431. Shao L, Sun X, Xu L, Young LT, Wang JF. (2006) Mood stabilizing drug lithium increases expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress proteins in primary cultured rat cerebral cortical cells. Life Sci 78:1317–1323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  432. Shapira M, Licht A, Milman A, Pick CG, Shohami E, Eldar-Finkelman H. (2007) Role of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta in early depressive behavior induced by mild traumatic brain injury. Mol Cell Neurosci 34:571–577 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  433. Shein NA, Grigoriadis N, Alexandrovich AG, Simeonidou C, Lourbopoulos A, Polyzoidou E, Trembovler V, Mascagni P, Dinarello CA, Shohami E. (2009) Histone deacetylase inhibitor ITF2357 is neuroprotective, improves functional recovery, and induces glial apoptosis following experimental traumatic brain injury. FASEB J 23:4266–4275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  434. Shimizu T, Shibata M, Wakisaka S, Inoue T, Mashimo T, Yoshiya I. (2000) Intrathecal lithium reduces neuropathic pain responses in a rat model of peripheral neuropathy. Pain 85:59–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  435. Shin JH, Cho SI, Lim HR, Lee JK, Lee YA, Noh JS, Joo IS, Kim KW, Gwag BJ. (2007) Concurrent administration of Neu2000 and lithium produces marked improvement of motor neuron survival, motor function, and mortality in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Mol Pharmacol 71:965–975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  436. Shioda N, Han F, Fukunaga K. (2009) Role of Akt and ERK signaling in the neurogenesis following brain ischemia. Int Rev Neurobiol 85:375–387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  437. Shirayama Y, Chen AC, Nakagawa S, Russell DS, Duman RS. (2002) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor produces antidepressant effects in behavioral models of depression. J Neurosci 22:3251–3261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  438. Shyu WC, Lin SZ, Chiang MF, Su CY, Li H. (2006) Intracerebral peripheral blood stem cell (CD34+) implantation induces neuroplasticity by enhancing beta1 integrin-mediated angiogenesis in chronic stroke rats. J Neurosci 26:3444–3453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  439. Siegel G, Saba R, Schratt G. (2011) microRNAs in neurons: manifold regulatory roles at the synapse. Curr Opin Genet Dev 21:491–497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  440. Sigurjonsson OE, Perreault MC, Egeland T, Glover JC. (2005) Adult human hematopoietic stem cells produce neurons efficiently in the regenerating chicken embryo spinal cord. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5227–5232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  441. Silva R, Martins L, Longatto-Filho A, Almeida OF, Sousa N. (2007) Lithium prevents stress-induced reduction of vascular endothelium growth factor levels. Neurosci Lett 429:33–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  442. Sinha D, Wang Z, Ruchalski KL, Levine JS, Krishnan S, Lieberthal W, Schwartz JH, Borkan SC. (2005) Lithium activates the Wnt and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase Akt signaling pathways to promote cell survival in the absence of soluble survival factors. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 288:F703–F713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  443. Sinn DI, Kim SJ, Chu K, Jung KH, Lee ST, Song EC, Kim JM, Park DK, Kun Lee S,, et al. (2007) Valproic acid-mediated neuroprotection in intracerebral hemorrhage via histone deacetylase inhibition and transcriptional activation. Neurobiol Dis 26:464–472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  444. Slow EJ, van Raamsdonk J, Rogers D, Coleman SH, Graham RK, Deng Y, Oh R, Bissada N, Hossain SM, Yang YZ, et al. (2003) Selective striatal neuronal loss in a YAC128 mouse model of Huntington disease. Hum Mol Genet 12:1555–1567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  445. Smith AM, Gibbons HM, Dragunow M. (2010) Valproic acid enhances microglial phagocytosis of amyloid-beta(1-42). Neuroscience 169:505–515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  446. Sofola O, Kerr F, Rogers I, Killick R, Augustin H, Gandy C, Allen MJ, Hardy J, Lovestone S, Partridge L. (2010) Inhibition of GSK-3 ameliorates Abeta pathology in an adult-onset Drosophila model of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS Genet 6:6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  447. Sovner R. (1989) The use of valproate in the treatment of mentally retarded persons with typical and atypical bipolar disorders. J Clin Psychiatry 50 (Suppl):40–43 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  448. Spikman JM, Timmerman ME, Milders MV, Veenstra WS, van der Naalt J. (2012) Social cognition impairments in relation to general cognitive deficits, injury severity, and prefrontal lesions in traumatic brain injury patients. J Neurotrauma 29:101–111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  449. Stambolic V, Ruel L, Woodgett JR. (1996) Lithium inhibits glycogen synthase kinase-3 activity and mimics wingless signalling in intact cells. Curr Biol 6:1664–1668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  450. Steelman LS, Pohnert SC, Shelton JG, Franklin RA, Bertrand FE, McCubrey JA. (2004) JAK/STAT, Raf/MEK/ERK, PI3K/Akt and BCR-ABL in cell cycle progression and leukemogenesis. Leukemia 18:189–218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  451. Su H, Chu TH, Wu W. (2007) Lithium enhances proliferation and neuronal differentiation of neural progenitor cells in vitro and after transplantation into the adult rat spinal cord. Exp Neurol 206:296–307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  452. Su Y, Ryder J, Li B, Wu X, Fox N, Solenberg P, Brune K, Paul S, Zhou Y, Liu F, et al. (2004) Lithium, a common drug for bipolar disorder treatment, regulates amyloid-beta precursor protein processing. Biochemistry 43:6899–6908 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  453. Sugai F, Yamamoto Y, Miyaguchi K, Zhou Z, Sumi H, Hamasaki T, Goto M, Sakoda S. (2004) Benefit of valproic acid in suppressing disease progression of ALS model mice. Eur J Neurosci 20:3179–3183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  454. Sugars KL, Rubinsztein DC. (2003) Transcriptional abnormalities in Huntington disease. Trends Genet 19:233–238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  455. Sumner CJ, Huynh TN, Markowitz JA, Perhac JS, Hill B, Coovert DD, Schussler K, Chen X, Jarecki J, Burghes AH, et al. (2003) Valproic acid increases SMN levels in spinal muscular atrophy patient cells. Ann Neurol 54:647–654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  456. Sun X, Sato S, Murayama O, Murayama M, Park JM, Yamaguchi H, Takashima A. (2002) Lithium inhibits amyloid secretion in COS7 cells transfected with amyloid precursor protein C100. Neurosci Lett 321:61–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  457. Sutcliffe JS, Nelson DL, Zhang F, Pieretti M, Caskey CT, Saxe D, Warren ST. (1992) DNA methylation represses FMR-1 transcription in fragile X syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 1:397–400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  458. Suwalska A, Sobieska M, Rybakowski JK. (2010) Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor in euthymic bipolar patients on prophylactic lithium therapy. Neuropsychobiology 62:229–234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  459. Sy M, Kitazawa M, Medeiros R, Whitman L, Cheng D, Lane TE, Laferla FM. (2011) Inflammation induced by infection potentiates tau pathological features in transgenic mice. Am J Pathol 178:2811–2822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  460. Symington GR, Leonard DP, Shannon PJ, Vajda FJ. (1978) Sodium valproate in Huntington’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 135:352–354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  461. Tabolacci E, De Pascalis I, Accadia M, Terracciano A, Moscato U, Chiurazzi P, Neri G. (2008) Modest reactivation of the mutant FMR1 gene by valproic acid is accompanied by histone modifications but not DNA demethylation. Pharmacogenet Genomics 18:738–741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  462. Tabolacci E, Pietrobono R, Moscato U, Oostra BA, Chiurazzi P, Neri G. (2005) Differential epigenetic modifications in the FMR1 gene of the fragile X syndrome after reactivating pharmacological treatments. Eur J Hum Genet 13:641–648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  463. Takahashi-Yanaga F, Sasaguri T. (2007) The Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway as a target in drug discovery. J Pharmacol Sci 104:293–302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  464. Takayama S, Reed JC, Homma S. (2003) Heat-shock proteins as regulators of apoptosis. Oncogene 22:9041–9047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  465. Tan BK, Leijnse-Ybema HJ, Zee MF. (1976) Sodium valproate in Huntington’s chorea. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 79:62–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  466. Tanaka T, Zhong J, Iqbal K, Trenkner E, Grundke-Iqbal I. (1998) The regulation of phosphorylation of tau in SY5Y neuroblastoma cells: the role of protein phosphatases. FEBS Lett 426:248–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  467. Tariot PN, Schneider LS, Cummings J, Thomas RG, Raman R, Jakimovich LJ, Loy R, Bartocci B, Fleisher AIsmail MSet al. Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study Group (2011) Chronic divalproex sodium to attenuate agitation and clinical progression of Alzheimer disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry 68:853–861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  468. Taylor-Robinson SD, Weeks RA, Bryant DJ, Sargentoni J, Marcus CD, Harding AE, and Brooks DJ (1996) Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in Huntington's disease: evidence in favour of the glutamate excitotoxic theory. Mov Disord 11:167-173. [DOI] [PubMed]
  469. Temkin NR, Dikmen SS, Anderson GD, Wilensky AJ, Holmes MD, Cohen W, Newell DW, Nelson P, Awan A, Winn HR. (1999) Valproate therapy for prevention of posttraumatic seizures: a randomized trial. J Neurosurg 91:593–600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  470. Terao T, Nakano H, Inoue Y, Okamoto T, Nakamura J, Iwata N. (2006) Lithium and dementia: a preliminary study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 30:1125–1128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  471. The BALANCE investigators and collaborators (2010) Lithium plus valproate combination therapy versus monotherapy for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder (BALANCE): a randomised open-label trial. Lancet 375:385–395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  472. Tolosa L, Mir M, Asensio VJ, Olmos G, Lladó J. (2008) Vascular endothelial growth factor protects spinal cord motoneurons against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. J Neurochem 105:1080–1090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  473. Torrioli M, Vernacotola S, Setini C, Bevilacqua F, Martinelli D, Snape M, Hutchison JA, Di Raimo FR, Tabolacci E, Neri G. (2010) Treatment with valproic acid ameliorates ADHD symptoms in fragile X syndrome boys. Am J Med Genet A 152A:1420–1427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  474. Torrioli MG, Vernacotola S, Peruzzi L, Tabolacci E, Mila M, Militerni R, Musumeci S, Ramos FJ, Frontera M, Sorge G, et al. (2008) A double-blind, parallel, multicenter comparison of L-acetylcarnitine with placebo on the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in fragile X syndrome boys. Am J Med Genet A 146:803–812 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  475. Tremolizzo L, Rodriguez-Menendez V, DiFrancesco JC, Sala G, Galbussera A, Appollonio I, Ferrarese C. (2007) Huntington’s disease and HDACi: would sulpiride and valproate be of therapeutic value? Med Hypotheses 69:964–965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  476. Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. (1995) Phosphorylation of paired helical filament tau in Alzheimer’s disease neurofibrillary lesions: focusing on phosphatases. FASEB J 9:1570–1576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  477. Tsai LK, Leng Y, Wang Z, Leeds P, Chuang DM. (2010) The mood stabilizers valproic acid and lithium enhance mesenchymal stem cell migration via distinct mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:2225–2237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  478. Tsai LK, Tsai MS, Lin TB, Hwu WL, Li H. (2006) Establishing a standardized therapeutic testing protocol for spinal muscular atrophy. Neurobiol Dis 24:286–295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  479. Tsai LK, Tsai MS, Ting CH, Wang SH, Li H. (2008) Restoring Bcl-x(L) levels benefits a mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy. Neurobiol Dis 31:361–367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  480. Tsai LK, Wang Z, Munasinghe J, Leng Y, Leeds P, Chuang DM. (2011) Mesenchymal stem cells primed with valproate and lithium robustly migrate to infarcted regions and facilitate recovery in a stroke model. Stroke 42:2932–2939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  481. Tsuji S, Morinobu S, Tanaka K, Kawano K, Yamawaki S. (2003) Lithium, but not valproate, induces the serine/threonine phosphatase activity of protein phosphatase 2A in the rat brain, without affecting its expression. J Neural Transm 110:413–425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  482. Turner BJ, Parkinson NJ, Davies KE, Talbot K. (2009) Survival motor neuron deficiency enhances progression in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse model. Neurobiol Dis 34:511–517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  483. Ursano RJ, Goldenberg M, Zhang L, Carlton J, Fullerton CS, Li H, Johnson L, Benedek D. (2010) Posttraumatic stress disorder and traumatic stress: from bench to bedside, from war to disaster. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1208:72–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  484. Uryu K, Chen XH, Martinez D, Browne KD, Johnson VE, Graham DI, Lee VM, Trojanowski JQ, Smith DH. (2007) Multiple proteins implicated in neurodegenerative diseases accumulate in axons after brain trauma in humans. Exp Neurol 208:185–192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  485. Van den Steen PE, Dubois B, Nelissen I, Rudd PM, Dwek RA, Opdenakker G. (2002) Biochemistry and molecular biology of gelatinase B or matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 37:375–536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  486. Varoglu AO. (2009) Na VPA-induced acute ischemic stroke in an epileptic patient with methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism. Epilepsy Res 86:232–236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  487. Veldink JH, Kalmijn S, Van der Hout AH, Lemmink HH, Groeneveld GJ, Lummen C, Scheffer H, Wokke JH, Van den Berg LH. (2005) SMN genotypes producing less SMN protein increase susceptibility to and severity of sporadic ALS. Neurology 65:820–825 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  488. Veldink JH, van den Berg LH, Cobben JM, Stulp RP, De Jong JM, Vogels OJ, Baas F, Wokke JH, Scheffer H. (2001) Homozygous deletion of the survival motor neuron 2 gene is a prognostic factor in sporadic ALS. Neurology 56:749–752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  489. Venkatachalam K, Long AA, Elsaesser R, Nikolaeva D, Broadie K, Montell C. (2008) Motor deficit in a Drosophila model of mucolipidosis type IV due to defective clearance of apoptotic cells. Cell 135:838–851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  490. Ventimiglia R, Mather PE, Jones BE, Lindsay RM. (1995) The neurotrophins BDNF, NT-3 and NT-4/5 promote survival and morphological and biochemical differentiation of striatal neurons in vitro. Eur J Neurosci 7:213–222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  491. Verkerk AJ, Pieretti M, Sutcliffe JS, Fu YH, Kuhl DP, Pizzuti A, Reiner O, Richards S, Victoria MF, Zhang FP, et al. (1991) Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome. Cell 65:905–914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  492. Verrotti A, Loiacono G, Laus M, Coppola G, Chiarelli F, Tiboni GM. (2011) Hormonal and reproductive disturbances in epileptic male patients: emerging issues. Reprod Toxicol 31:519–527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  493. Verstraete E, Veldink JH, Huisman MH, Draak T, Uijtendaal EV, van der Kooi AJ, Schelhaas HJ, de Visser M, van der Tweel I, van den Berg LH. (2012) Lithium lacks effect on survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a phase IIb randomised sequential trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 83:557–564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  494. Vestergaard P, Baastrup PC, Petersson H. (1977) Lithium treatment of Huntington’s chorea. A placebo-controlled clinical trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand 56:183–188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  495. Vonsattel JP, DiFiglia M. (1998) Huntington disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 57:369–384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  496. Walasek MA, Bystrykh L, van den Boom V, Olthof S, Ausema A, Ritsema M, Huls G, de Haan G, van Os R. (2012) The combination of valproic acid and lithium delays hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell differentiation. Blood 119:3050–3059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  497. Wang JF, Azzam JE, Young LT. (2003) Valproate inhibits oxidative damage to lipid and protein in primary cultured rat cerebrocortical cells. Neuroscience 116:485–489 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  498. Wang JF, Bown C, Young LT. (1999) Differential display PCR reveals novel targets for the mood-stabilizing drug valproate including the molecular chaperone GRP78. Mol Pharmacol 55:521–527 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  499. Wang JF, Bown CD, Chen B, Young LT. (2001) Identification of mood stabilizer-regulated genes by differential-display PCR. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 4:65–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  500. Wang Y, Deng Y, Zhou GQ. (2008) SDF-1alpha/CXCR4-mediated migration of systemically transplanted bone marrow stromal cells towards ischemic brain lesion in a rat model. Brain Res 1195:104–112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  501. Wang Y, Mao XO, Xie L, Banwait S, Marti HH, Greenberg DA, Jin K. (2007) Vascular endothelial growth factor overexpression delays neurodegeneration and prolongs survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mice. J Neurosci 27:304–307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  502. Wang Z, Leng Y, Tsai LK, Leeds P, Chuang DM. (2011a) Valproic acid attenuates blood-brain barrier disruption in a rat model of transient focal cerebral ischemia: the roles of HDAC and MMP-9 inhibition. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 31:52–57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  503. Wang Z, Tsai LK, Munasinghe J, Leng Y, Fessler EB, Chibane F, Leeds P, Chuang DM. (2012) Chronic valproate treatment enhances postischemic angiogenesis and promotes functional recovery in a rat model of ischemic stroke. Stroke 43:2430–2436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  504. Wang ZF, Fessler EB, Chuang DM. (2011b) Beneficial effects of mood stabilizers lithium, valproate and lamotrigine in experimental stroke models. Acta Pharmacol Sin 32:1433–1445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  505. Warner-Schmidt JL, Duman RS. (2007) VEGF is an essential mediator of the neurogenic and behavioral actions of antidepressants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:4647–4652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  506. Watase K, Gatchel JR, Sun Y, Emamian E, Atkinson R, Richman R, Mizusawa H, Orr HT, Shaw C, Zoghbi HY. (2007) Lithium therapy improves neurological function and hippocampal dendritic arborization in a spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 mouse model. PLoS Med 4:e182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  507. Wei H, Qin ZH, Senatorov VV, Wei W, Wang Y, Qian Y, Chuang DM. (2001) Lithium suppresses excitotoxicity-induced striatal lesions in a rat model of Huntington’s disease. Neuroscience 106:603–612 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  508. Wei HF, Leeds PR, Qian YN, Wei WL, Chen RW, Chuang DM. (2000) beta-amyloid peptide-induced death of PC 12 cells and cerebellar granule cell neurons is inhibited by long-term lithium treatment. Eur J Pharmacol 392:117–123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  509. Wexler EM, Geschwind DH, Palmer TD. (2008) Lithium regulates adult hippocampal progenitor development through canonical Wnt pathway activation. Mol Psychiatry 13:285–292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  510. Wheelock VL, Tempkin T, Marder K, Nance M, Myers RH, Zhao H, Kayson E, Orme C, Shoulson I, Huntington Study Group (2003) Predictors of nursing home placement in Huntington disease. Neurology 60:998–1001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  511. Wijesekera LC, Leigh PN. (2009) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis 4:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  512. Wiltse J. (2005) Mode of action: inhibition of histone deacetylase, altering WNT-dependent gene expression, and regulation of beta-catenin—developmental effects of valproic acid. Crit Rev Toxicol 35:727–738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  513. Wirrell EC. (2003) Valproic acid-associated weight gain in older children and teens with epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol 28:126–129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  514. Woo NH and Lu B (2006) Regulation of cortical interneurons by neurotrophins: from development to cognitive disorders. Neuroscientist 12:43–56. [DOI] [PubMed]
  515. Wood NI, Morton AJ. (2003) Chronic lithium chloride treatment has variable effects on motor behaviour and survival of mice transgenic for the Huntington’s disease mutation. Brain Res Bull 61:375–383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  516. Wu JB, Shih JC. (2011) Valproic acid induces monoamine oxidase A via Akt/forkhead box O1 activation. Mol Pharmacol 80:714–723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  517. Wu X, Chen PS, Dallas S, Wilson B, Block ML, Wang CC, Kinyamu H, Lu N, Gao X, Leng Y, et al. (2008) Histone deacetylase inhibitors up-regulate astrocyte GDNF and BDNF gene transcription and protect dopaminergic neurons. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 11:1123–1134 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  518. Xiong N, Jia M, Chen C, Xiong J, Zhang Z, Huang J, Hou L, Yang H, Cao X, Liang Z, et al. (2011) Potential autophagy enhancers attenuate rotenone-induced toxicity in SH-SY5Y. Neuroscience 199:292–302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  519. Xu C, Li PP, Cooke RG, Parikh SV, Wang K, Kennedy JL, Warsh JJ. (2009) TRPM2 variants and bipolar disorder risk: confirmation in a family-based association study. Bipolar Disord 11:1–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  520. Xu C, Macciardi F, Li PP, Yoon IS, Cooke RG, Hughes B, Parikh SV, McIntyre RS, Kennedy JL, Warsh JJ. (2006) Association of the putative susceptibility gene, transient receptor potential protein melastatin type 2, with bipolar disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 141B:36–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  521. Xu J, Culman J, Blume A, Brecht S, Gohlke P. (2003) Chronic treatment with a low dose of lithium protects the brain against ischemic injury by reducing apoptotic death. Stroke 34:1287–1292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  522. Xuan A, Long D, Li J, Ji W, Hong L, Zhang M, Zhang W. (2012) Neuroprotective effects of valproic acid following transient global ischemia in rats. Life Sci 90:463–468 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  523. Yamamoto A, Lucas JJ, Hen R. (2000) Reversal of neuropathology and motor dysfunction in a conditional model of Huntington’s disease. Cell 101:57–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  524. Yamanaka T, Miyazaki H, Oyama F, Kurosawa M, Washizu C, Doi H, Nukina N. (2008) Mutant Huntingtin reduces HSP70 expression through the sequestration of NF-Y transcription factor. EMBO J 27:827–839 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  525. Yan XB, Hou HL, Wu LM, Liu J, Zhou JN. (2007) Lithium regulates hippocampal neurogenesis by ERK pathway and facilitates recovery of spatial learning and memory in rats after transient global cerebral ischemia. Neuropharmacology 53:487–495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  526. Yang W, Leystra-Lantz C, Strong MJ. (2008) Upregulation of GSK3beta expression in frontal and temporal cortex in ALS with cognitive impairment (ALSci). Brain Res 1196:131–139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  527. Yasuda S, Liang MH, Marinova Z, Yahyavi A, Chuang DM. (2009) The mood stabilizers lithium and valproate selectively activate the promoter IV of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in neurons. Mol Psychiatry 14:51–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  528. Yatham LN. (2004) Newer anticonvulsants in the treatment of bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 65 (Suppl 10):28–35 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  529. Yick LW, So KF, Cheung PT, Wu WT. (2004) Lithium chloride reinforces the regeneration-promoting effect of chondroitinase ABC on rubrospinal neurons after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 21:932–943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  530. Youdim MB, Arraf Z. (2004) Prevention of MPTP (N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine) dopaminergic neurotoxicity in mice by chronic lithium: involvements of Bcl-2 and Bax. Neuropharmacology 46:1130–1140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  531. Yu F, Wang Z, Tchantchou F, Chiu CT, Zhang Y, Chuang DM. (2012a) Lithium ameliorates neurodegeneration, suppresses neuroinflammation, and improves behavioral performance in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 29:362–374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  532. Yu F, Zhang Y and Chuang DM (2012b) Lithium reduces BACE1 overexpression, beta amyloid accumulation, and spatial learning deficits in mice with traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 29:2342–2351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  533. Yu IT, Park JY, Kim SH, Lee JS, Kim YS, Son H. (2009) Valproic acid promotes neuronal differentiation by induction of proneural factors in association with H4 acetylation. Neuropharmacology 56:473–480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  534. Yu Z, Luo H, Fu W, Mattson MP. (1999) The endoplasmic reticulum stress-responsive protein GRP78 protects neurons against excitotoxicity and apoptosis: suppression of oxidative stress and stabilization of calcium homeostasis. Exp Neurol 155:302–314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  535. Yuan PX, Huang LD, Jiang YM, Gutkind JS, Manji HK, Chen G. (2001) The mood stabilizer valproic acid activates mitogen-activated protein kinases and promotes neurite growth. J Biol Chem 276:31674–31683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  536. Yucel K, McKinnon MC, Taylor VH, Macdonald K, Alda M, Young LT, MacQueen GM. (2007) Bilateral hippocampal volume increases after long-term lithium treatment in patients with bipolar disorder: a longitudinal MRI study. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 195:357–367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  537. Yucel K, Taylor VH, McKinnon MC, Macdonald K, Alda M, Young LT, MacQueen GM. (2008) Bilateral hippocampal volume increase in patients with bipolar disorder and short-term lithium treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:361–367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  538. Zádori D, Geisz A, Vámos E, Vécsei L, Klivényi P. (2009) Valproate ameliorates the survival and the motor performance in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington’s disease. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 94:148–153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  539. Zarate CA, Jr, Singh J, Manji HK. (2006) Cellular plasticity cascades: targets for the development of novel therapeutics for bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 59:1006–1020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  540. Zeron MM, Chen N, Moshaver A, Lee AT, Wellington CL, Hayden MR, Raymond LA. (2001) Mutant huntingtin enhances excitotoxic cell death. Mol Cell Neurosci 17:41–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  541. Zeron MM, Hansson O, Chen N, Wellington CL, Leavitt BR, Brundin P, Hayden MR, Raymond LA. (2002) Increased sensitivity to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity in a mouse model of Huntington’s disease. Neuron 33:849–860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  542. Zhang B, West EJ, Van KC, Gurkoff GG, Zhou J, Zhang XM, Kozikowski AP, Lyeth BG. (2008) HDAC inhibitor increases histone H3 acetylation and reduces microglia inflammatory response following traumatic brain injury in rats. Brain Res 1226:181–191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  543. Zhang F, Phiel CJ, Spece L, Gurvich N, Klein PS. (2003) Inhibitory phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) in response to lithium. Evidence for autoregulation of GSK-3. J Biol Chem 278:33067–33077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  544. Zhang X, Heng X, Li T, Li L, Yang D, Zhang X, Du Y, Doody RS, Le W. (2011a) Long-term treatment with lithium alleviates memory deficits and reduces amyloid-β production in an aged Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mouse model. J Alzheimers Dis 24:739–749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  545. Zhang Y, Sun Y, Wang F, Wang Z, Peng Y, Li R. (2012a) Downregulating the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway attenuates the susceptibility to autism-like phenotypes by decreasing oxidative stress. Neurochem Res 37:1409–1419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  546. Zhang Z, Qin X, Zhao X, Tong N, Gong Y, Zhang W, Wu X. (2012b) Valproic acid regulates antioxidant enzymes and prevents ischemia/reperfusion injury in the rat retina. Curr Eye Res 37:429–437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  547. Zhang Z, Tong N, Gong Y, Qiu Q, Yin L, Lv X, Wu X. (2011b) Valproate protects the retina from endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis after ischemia-reperfusion injury. Neurosci Lett 504:88–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  548. Zheng Z, Kim JY, Ma H, Lee JE, Yenari MA. (2008) Anti-inflammatory effects of the 70 kDa heat shock protein in experimental stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 28:53–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  549. Zhong J, Yang X, Yao W, Lee W. (2006) Lithium protects ethanol-induced neuronal apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 350:905–910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  550. Zhou R, Yuan P, Wang Y, Hunsberger JG, Elkahloun A, Wei Y, Damschroder-Williams P, Du J, Chen G, Manji HK. (2009) Evidence for selective microRNAs and their effectors as common long-term targets for the actions of mood stabilizers. Neuropsychopharmacology 34:1395–1405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  551. Zhu ZF, Wang QG, Han BJ, William CP. (2010) Neuroprotective effect and cognitive outcome of chronic lithium on traumatic brain injury in mice. Brain Res Bull 83:272–277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  552. Zhuang J, Li F, Liu X, Liu Z, Lin J, Ge Y, Kaminski JM, Summers JB, Wang Z, Ge J, et al. (2009) Lithium chloride protects retinal neurocytes from nutrient deprivation by promoting DNA non-homologous end-joining. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 380:650–654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  553. Zuccato C, Belyaev N, Conforti P, Ooi L, Tartari M, Papadimou E, MacDonald M, Fossale E, Zeitlin S, Buckley N, et al. (2007) Widespread disruption of repressor element-1 silencing transcription factor/neuron-restrictive silencer factor occupancy at its target genes in Huntington’s disease. J Neurosci 27:6972–6983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  554. Zuccato C, Ciammola A, Rigamonti D, Leavitt BR, Goffredo D, Conti L, MacDonald ME, Friedlander RM, Silani V, Hayden MR, et al. (2001) Loss of huntingtin-mediated BDNF gene transcription in Huntington’s disease. Science 293:493–498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  555. Zuccato C, Tartari M, Crotti A, Goffredo D, Valenza M, Conti L, Cataudella T, Leavitt BR, Hayden MR, Timmusk T, et al. (2003) Huntingtin interacts with REST/NRSF to modulate the transcription of NRSE-controlled neuronal genes. Nat Genet 35:76–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Pharmacological Reviews are provided here courtesy of American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

RESOURCES