Skip to main content
American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology logoLink to American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology
. 2012 Dec 26;304(4):F382–F389. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00581.2012

Tubuloglomerular feedback and renal function in mice with targeted deletion of the type 1 equilibrative nucleoside transporter

Lingli Li 1, Diane Mizel 1, Yuning Huang 1, Christoph Eisner 1,2, Marion Hoerl 3, Manfred Thiel 2, Jurgen Schnermann 1,
PMCID: PMC3566497  PMID: 23269643

Abstract

A1 adenosine receptors (A1AR) are required for the modulation of afferent arteriolar tone by changes in luminal NaCl concentration implying that extracellular adenosine concentrations need to change in synchrony with NaCl. The present experiments were performed in mice with a null mutation in the gene for the major equilibrative nucleoside transporter ENT1 to test whether interference with adenosine disposition by cellular uptake of adenosine may modify TGF characteristics. Responses of stop flow pressure (PSF) to maximum flow stimulation were measured in mice with either C57Bl/6 or SWR/J genetic backgrounds. Maximum flow stimulation reduced PSF in ENT1−/− compared with wild-type (WT) mice by 1.6 ± 0.4 mmHg (n = 28) and 5.8 ± 1.1 mmHg (n = 17; P < 0.001) in C57Bl/6 and by 1.4 ± 0.4 mmHg (n = 15) and 9 ± 1.5 mmHg (n = 9; P < 0.001) in SWR/J. Plasma concentrations of adenosine and inosine were markedly higher in ENT1−/− than WT mice (ado: 1,179 ± 78 and 225 ± 48 pmol/ml; ino: 179 ± 24 and 47.5 ± 9 pmol/ml). Renal mRNA expressions of the four adenosine receptors, ENT2, and adenosine deaminase were not significantly different between WT and ENT1−/− mice. No significant differences of glomerular filtration rate or mean arterial blood pressure were found while plasma renin concentration, and heart rates were significantly lower in ENT1−/− animals. In conclusion, TGF responsiveness is significantly attenuated in the absence of ENT1, pointing to a role of nucleoside transport in the NaCl-synchronous changes of extracellular adenosine levels in the juxtaglomerular apparatus interstitium.

Keywords: stop flow pressure, micropuncture, adenosine, plasma renin, blood pressure


substantial experimental evidence supports a critical role of purine nucleotides and nucleosides in the mediation of the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) response of afferent arterioles to changes of NaCl concentration at the macula densa cells of the juxtaglomerular apparatus. Release of nucleotides, specifically of ATP, by macula densa cells appears to provide the substrate for extracellular ATPases to generate AMP, which is subsequently dephosphorylated by 5′-ecto-nucleotidase to form the nucleoside adenosine. Activation of A1 adenosine receptors (A1AR) on afferent arterioles seems to be the endpoint responsible for TGF-mediated vasoconstriction. An underlying assumption of this scenario is that both ATP and adenosine levels within the juxtaglomerular apparatus (JGA) interstitium fluctuate dependent on the composition of the tubular fluid at the macula densa and that these fluctuations are required for afferent arteriolar resistance to adjust to luminal NaCl concentration changes. It is conceivable therefore that interference with the pathways for the appearance and disappearance of the purinergic mediator components could modify TGF responses because such interventions might disrupt cycling of the mediator concentrations within the appropriate range.

Extracellular adenosine levels are determined by the kinetics of dephosphorylation of ATP and AMP, by deamination of adenosine into inosine, and by nucleoside transport across cell membranes. Thus, while blocking dephosphorylation of nucleotides should diminish adenosine levels, inhibition of adenosine deamination or uptake should increase adenosine availability. The effect of such interventions on acute TGF responses has been explored previously using genetic and pharmacologic tools. Specifically, inhibition of ATP or AMP dephosphorylation by disrupting ecto-ATPase or 5′-nucleotidase function has been found to attenuate TGF responses, suggesting that these interventions cause a reduction of adenosine generation that is not overcome by increasing macula densa NaCl concentration and ATP release (3, 13, 20, 34). Information related to the effect of interference with nucleoside transport on TGF has been less consistent. Transmembrane transport of nucleosides is facilitated by a family of nucleoside transport proteins that either operate in a Na-dependent fashion (concentrative nucleoside transporters; CNTs) or permit equilibration according to prevailing gradients [equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENTs); Refs. 7, 15]. ENT1, the equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1, is expressed in the kidney, and it is inhibited with high affinity by dipyridamole or dilazep. Inhibition of nucleoside transporters by administration of dipyridamole or dilazep has been reported to cause either enhancement or inhibition of TGF responses (14, 23, 35). The availability of mice with targeted inactivation of the ENT1 gene provided a new way of testing the effect of ENT1 deficiency on TGF activity (4). Thus in the present experiments we determined TGF responsiveness in ENT1-deficient mice to examine the influence of chronically interfering with a major pathway of disposition of extracellular adenosine on TGF-mediated vasoconstriction. Our data show that the absence of ENT1 causes the expected increase of circulating adenosine levels and that this is associated with markedly reduced TGF responsiveness. Thus clamping circulating adenosine levels at supranormal levels by chronic inhibition of adenosine uptake has the perhaps unexpected consequence of reducing the dynamics of the acute vascular response to increased macula densa NaCl.

METHODS

Animals.

Experiments were performed in mice with null mutations of the gene for the ENT1 originally generated by Choi et al. (4). Mice used in this study had been bred into a C57Bl/6 background for more than 10 generations and into a SWR/J background for more than 6 generations at the National Institutes of Health animal facility. Mice were genotyped by PCR of tail DNA using the following primers: 5′-AAGTGTGGGTCATCACACTGCTTC-3′, and 5′-ATGAGATCCAACTT GGTCTCCTG-3′ as originally described (4). Animals ranged in weight from 20–31 g and in age from 3–5 mo. Animals were kept on a standard diet (NaCl content 0.2%) and tap water. Animal care and experimentation were approved and carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

mRNA expression studies.

Kidneys were removed from anesthetized mice. Twenty milligrams of sliced kidney cortex (or in some experiments of cortex, outer and inner medulla) were immediately soaked in 600 μl of lysis buffer (Qiagen kit; Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and homogenized. The homogenates cleaned by centrifugation were used to purify total RNAs by using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). One microgram of RNA was synthesized to 20 μl of cDNA using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). One microliter of cDNA synthesized from 50 ng of RNA was used to detect adenosine receptor mRNA expression by real-time PCR. Primers were purchased from the Taqman gene expression inventory (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) under the following codes: A1AR Mm01308023_m1, A2aAR Mm00802075_m1, A2bAR Mm00839292_m1, A3AR Mm00802076_m1, ENT1 Mm01270582_m1, ENT2 Mm00432817_m1, adenosine deaminase Mm00545720_m1, and hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1) Mm03024075_m1. HPRT1 RNA was used as endogenous control throughout. The difference in the expression of target cDNA was calculated using the comparative cycle threshold (CT) method.

Measurement of adenosine and inosine in plasma.

ENT1 knockout mice (C57Bl/6; n = 6) and background-matched wild-type (WT) mice (n = 5) were anesthetized with isoflurane (induction: 4%, maintenance: 2%) delivered with 100% oxygen over a nose mask. Immediately after sufficient anesthesia was achieved blood was drawn from the carotid artery into a syringe prefilled with a stop solution to prevent metabolism of adenosine (19). The ratio of blood to stop solution was 1 to 1. After centrifugation, the plasma was separated, de-proteinated with 70% perchloric acid, and shock-frozen in liquid nitrogen. The denatured proteins were later removed by centrifugation, and the sample was neutralized by an equal amount of KOH. The concentrations of adenosine and inosine were measured using a dual column switching high-performance liquid affinity chromatography (HPLAC)/reversed-phase HPLC technique (11).

Micropuncture experiments.

Mice were anesthetized with 100 mg/kg thiobutabarbital (inactin) intraperitoneally and 100 mg/kg ketamine subcutaneously. Body temperature was maintained at 37.5°C by placing the animals on an operating table with a servo-controlled heating plate. The trachea was cannulated, and a stream of 100% oxygen was blown towards the tracheal tube throughout the experiment. The left carotid artery was catheterized with hand-drawn polyethylene tubing for continuous measurement of arterial blood pressure and blood withdrawal. A catheter connected to an infusion pump was inserted into the right jugular vein for an intravenous maintenance infusion of saline at 300 μl/h. The left kidney was approached from a flank incision, freed of fat and tissue connections, and placed in a lucite holding cup. Measurements of stop flow pressure (PSF) during perfusion of loop of Henle were done as described previously (32, 37). When PSF had stabilized, the perfusion rate of the loop of Henle was increased to 30 nl/min and maximum PSF responses were determined. The perfusion rate was then reduced to 0 nl/min and maintained until steady states were achieved at each flow rate. Two such responses were determined successively in each nephron. The perfusion fluid contained the following (in mM/l) 136 NaCl, 4 NaHCO3, 4 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 7.5 urea, and 100 mg/100 ml FD&C green (Keystone, Bellefonte, PA).

Glomerular filtration rate.

The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured by single injection FITC inulin clearance as described by Qi and colleagues (8, 27) modified to minimize blood collections. During brief isoflurane anesthesia from which the mice recovered within ∼20 s, FITC-sinistrin dissolved in saline at a concentration of 5 g% was injected at 3.74 μl/g body wt into the retroorbital plexus (FITC-sinistrin was kindly supplied by Dr. Norbert Gretz, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Germany). At 3, 7, 10, 15, 35, 55, and 75 min, mice were placed in a restrainer, and ∼4 μl blood were collected into heparinized 5-μl microcaps by nicking the tail vein (Drummond Scientific, Broomall, PA). One microliter of plasma was diluted in 9 μl of 500 mmol HEPES buffer (pH 7.4), and fluorescence was determined using a NanoDrop ND-3300 fluorospectrometer. A standard curve was generated by determining fluorescence in 1 μl of 5%-FITC-sinistrin diluted 1:50, 1:100, 1:500, and 1:1,000 in 500 mmol HEPES buffer. Fluorescence was determined in 1.7 μl in a Nanodrop-ND-3300 spectrometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE). GFR was calculated using a two-compartment model of two-phase exponential decay (27).

Plasma renin concentration.

Blood was collected from conscious mice by puncture of the mandibular vein and collection of ∼20 μl of the emerging blood into an EDTA-containing microhematocrit tube. Plasma renin concentration was determined by incubating plasma in the presence of an excess of rat renin substrate and measuring the generated angiotensin I with a RIA kit (DiaSorin, Stillwater, MN) as described in detail earlier (3).

Blood pressure and heart rate.

Arterial blood pressure and heart rate were measured with radiotransmitters (model TA11PA-C10; Data Sciences International, St. Paul, MN) implanted during ketamine and xylazine anesthesia (90 and 10 mg/kg, respectively) in the carotid artery as previously described (21). Seven to ten days after surgery data sampling was done for 10 s every 2 min over a period of at least 5 days. Radiosignals were processed using a model RPC-1 receiver, a 20-channel data exchange matrix, APR-1 ambient pressure monitor, and a Data Quest ART Silver 2.3 acquisition system. The recording room was maintained at 21–22 °C with a 12:12-h light-dark cycle.

RESULTS

ENT mRNA expression.

As shown in Fig. 1, measurements of intrarenal distribution of ENT1 expression showed a cortico-medullary expression gradient with highest expression levels in the inner medulla. Expression levels of ENT1 and ENT2 mRNA are shown in Fig. 2. ENT1 expression in the kidneys of female WT mice was markedly higher than expression of ENT2. ENT1 deletion reduced ENT 1 expression to undetermined levels as expected, but it did not cause significant changes in ENT2 expression.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Regional distribution of equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1) mRNA in kidneys of male C57Bl/6 wild-type (WT) mice. Values are means ± SE, and measurements in outer medulla (OM) and inner medulla (IM) are expressed as percentage of kidney cortex. *P < 0.05, by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test for comparison with cortex.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

mRNA expression of ENT1 (left) and ENT2 (right) in kidneys of female WT (●) and ENT1−/− mice (○). Data are measurements in individual kidneys and values are expressed as percent of ENT1 in WT mice.

Adenosine receptor mRNA and circulating adenosine.

Measurements of adenosine receptor mRNA by quantitative RT-PCR are summarized in Figs. 3 and 4. Renal expression of all adenosine receptors was higher in female than in male mice with statistical significance being reached for A1AR and A2bAR, the receptor subtypes with the highest renal expression levels (Fig. 3). The main conclusion in the context of the present studies is that the impaired nucleoside uptake in ENT1−/− mice is not associated with significant changes in the renal expression of any of the adenosine receptor subtypes (Fig. 4). Likewise, adenosine deaminase mRNA expression was not found to be different in kidneys of WT or ENT1−/− mice while it was significantly downregulated in the brain (Fig. 5). As shown in Fig. 6, adenosine levels in the plasma of ENT1-deficient mice were significantly higher than WT mice by a factor of ∼6. There was also a significantly higher plasma inosine concentration by a factor of ∼5 in the ENT1-deficient mice.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

mRNA expression of A1, A2a, A2b, and A3 adenosine receptors (AR) in kidneys of male (filled bars) and female (open bars) C57Bl/6 WT mice; data are means ± SE, and values are expressed as percentage of A1AR levels in the male mice. **P < 0.001.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

mRNA expression of A1, A2a, and A2b AR in male (left) and female (right) C57Bl/6 WT(filled bars) and ENT1-deficient mice (open bars); data are means ± SE, and values are expressed relative to the mRNA expression of A1AR in WT mice.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Expression of adenosine deaminase (ADA) mRNA in kidneys (left) and brains (right) of female WT and ENT1−/− mice; data are means ± SE, and values are expressed relative to mRNA expression in WT mice; statistical comparison by t-test.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Plasma levels of adenosine (left) and inosine (right) in male WT and ENT1−/− mice; values are measurements in individual mice; statistical comparison by t-test.

TGF.

Measurements of PSF responses to a saturating increase of loop of Henle flow rate (0–30 nl/min) were done in male WT and ENT1−/− mice on both C57Bl/6 (WT: 7 mice, ENT1−/−: 8 mice) and SWR/J backgrounds (WT: 3 mice, ENT1−/−: 5 mice). Data are summarized in Fig. 7. In the C57Bl/6 strains PSF fell from 33.7 ± 1.5 to 27.9 ± 1.6 mmHg in WT mice (n = 17) and from 37.5 ± 2 to 35.8 ± 1.9 mmHg in the ENT1−/− mice (n = 28). Mean arterial blood pressure during micropuncture averaged 87 ± 3.6 mmHg in WT and 85 ± 3 mmHg in ENT1−/− mice. An attenuated TGF response was also observed in the SWR/J strain in which PSF fell from 39.9 ± 1.9 to 30.9 ± 2 mmHg in WT (n = 9) and from 30.2 ± 1.5 to 28.9 ± 1.6 mmHg in ENT1−/− animals (n = 15). In these mice, mean arterial pressure was 89.6 ± 5.5 mmHg in WT and 93.5 ± 4.6 mmHg in ENT1−/− mice. As shown in Fig. 8, the average magnitude of the on-response was 5.8 ± 1.1 mmHg in WT and 1.6 ± 0.4 mmHg in ENT1−/− of the C57Bl/6 background (P < 0.001), and 9 ± 1.5 mmHg in WT and 1.4 ± 0.4 mmHg in ENT1−/− of the SWR/J background (P < 0.001). The difference in TGF responses between C57Bl/6 and SWR/J WT mice was not significant (P = 0.12).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Tubuloglomerular feedback responses of tubular stop flow pressure (PSF) in male WT (○) and ENT1-deficient mice (●) in a C57Bl/6 (A) or SWR/J (B) genetic background. Lines connect data from individual nephrons at perfusion rates of 0 or 30 nl/min. Mean values are indicated by larger symbols. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, comparing perfusion at 30 with 0 nl/min by paired t-test.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Reduction of tubular PSF in response to a flow increase from 0 to 30 nl/min in WT and ENT1−/− mice in a C57Bl/7 (left) and SWR/J (right) genetic background. Data are means ± SE. ***P < 0.001, comparing WT and ENT1−/− by t-test.

Renal function and plasma renin.

Measurements of GFR in conscious female C57Bl/6 WT and ENT1−/− revealed no significant differences between genotypes (345.8 ± 26.5 vs. 347.5 ± 54 μl/min; n = 8 and 11, respectively). However, osmolarity and chloride concentrations of spontaneously voided urine were significantly lower in ENT1-deficient animals (Fig. 9). Although we did not rigorously explore the causes for the reduced urine osmolarity, we observed in a subset of mice that 24 h of water withdrawal markedly augmented urine osmolarity in ENT1−/− mice virtually eliminating the difference between genotypes. The decrease in urinary concentration in the ENT1−/− mice was accompanied by a significant increase in water intake by ∼25% (Fig. 9). Plasma renin concentration measured with the standard radioactive assay was significantly lower in ENT1-deficient mice (Fig. 10).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Osmolarity and chloride concentration in spontaneously voided urine, and daily water intake of C57Bl/6 WT (filled bars) and ENT1−/− mice (open bars); values are means ± SE; numerals indicate numbers of animals and represent both male and female animals. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, comparing WT and ENT1−/− by t-test.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.

Plasma renin concentration (PRC) in WT and ENT1−/− mice on C57Bl/6 (left) and SWR/J genetic backgrounds (right). Experiments were done in male (m) and female (f) animals (C57Bl/6 WT/KO: 6 m, 5 f/4 m, 5 f; SWR/J WT/KO: 7 m, 6 f /4 m, 6 f); data were combined since no gender differences were found.

Blood pressure and heart rate.

Telemetric measurements in C57Bl/6 WT (4 male and 5 female) and ENT1−/− mice (4 male and 6 female) are summarized in Fig. 11. Since there were no discernible gender differences data from male and female were combined. While mean arterial blood pressure did not reveal significant differences between genotypes, heart rates were significantly lower during both day and night time periods. As shown in Fig. 12, daily variations of blood pressure and heart rate indicate that circadian rhythms were normal and not different between genotypes although heart rates cycled at a lower level in the ENT1−/− animals.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11.

Telemetric determinations of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and heart rate in WT (filled bars; n = 9; 5 male, 4 female) and ENT1−/− mice [knockout (KO); open bars; n = 10; 5 male, 5 female]; data are means ± SE and represent hourly averages for the entire day (24 mean), day, and night. bpm, Beats/min. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test.

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12.

Telemetric recordings of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate in WT (●) and ENT1−/− mice (○). Data are shown for 2 consecutive days on 12:12-h light-dark cycles (dark periods from 18 to 6 h indicated by shaded areas). Lines represent smoothed data using the weighted average of the nearest 9 points.

DISCUSSION

The present experiments were performed with the aim of investigating the effects of chronic deficiency of ENT1-mediated nucleoside transport on the regulation of glomerular arteriolar tone by changes in tubular NaCl concentration in the juxtaglomerular region of the nephron. The relevance of this question lies in the well-recognized role of adenosine as a vascular mediator of this regulatory pathway and the possibility that transmembrane transport of adenosine may be part of the mechanisms that allow mediator concentrations in the juxtaglomerular interstitium to track changes in luminal NaCl concentration. Our data show that TGF responses are significantly diminished in mice with a null mutation in ENT1, the major equilibrative nucleoside transporter in the kidney.

Nucleoside transport across cell membranes is mediated by a family of membrane proteins that act either as facilitative carriers or as Na-dependent cotransporters (15). Facilitation of transport by ENT proteins is a downhill movement according to prevailing concentration gradients thereby permitting equilibration between intra- and extracellular levels of nucleosides (1). The main equilibrative nucleoside transporter ENT1 is widely expressed across tissues and species, and it is found in the kidney in both tubular and extratubular locations including glomeruli and vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells (5, 9). The present studies show some prevalence of medullary compared with cortical ENT1 expression, and this may be due to ENT 1 expression in collecting ducts and thick ascending limbs as previously reported (5). ENT2 expression in the kidney was found to be rather low comparatively, and its abundance was not affected by deletion of ENT1. The prevalence of ENT1 in renal nucleoside transport has been demonstrated previously in isolated tubule preparations that showed a marked reduction of adenosine uptake in tissue from ENT1−/− mice while uptake in tissue from ENT2−/− mice was not different from controls (10). Thus although it is conceivable that ENT2 contributes to adenosine release, these results indicate that this effect is unlikely to be different between WT and ENT1−/− animals.

The clear increase in circulating adenosine and inosine levels in ENT1-deficient mice indicates that the bulk of extracellular adenosine is derived from breakdown of released adenine nucleotides. An increase of plasma adenosine levels has previously been observed in ENT1−/− mice (28) as well as in humans or rabbits treated with the ENT inhibitors dipyridamole or dilazep (18, 33). The important question of whether an increase of extracellular adenosine through nucleotide metabolism also occurs in the JGA interstitium cannot be answered directly. Nevertheless, evidence for the release of ATP across the basal membranes of macula densa cells and functional observations supporting a role of nucleotidases in the adenosine-dependent TGF response would appear to support this notion. Furthermore, recent in vivo observations with fluorescent markers are consistent with the proposal that afferent arterioles close to the glomerulum are permeable and that this may support substance transfer from plasma to the JGA interstitium by convective fluid flow (29). Direct activation of A1AR in JG cells by elevated adenosine may be responsible for the inhibition of renin secretion and the decrease of plasma renin concentration observed in ENT1−/− mice. A consequence of A1AR activation by elevated levels of adenosine outside the kidney may be the fall in heart rate in ENT1-deficient mice that was found despite a small reduction in arterial blood pressure. Studies in A1AR-deficient mice have suggested that this may reflect a direct effect of adenosine on cardiac pacemaker activity (38). On the other hand, an increase in heart rate without changes in arterial blood pressure has recently also been observed in mice with selective deletion of A1AR in neuronal cells induced by nestin-driven cre-recombinase indicating that inhibition of central nervous cardiovascular pathways may contribute to the heart rate effect (16).

The reasons for the reduction of TGF responsiveness by chronic ENT1 deletion are not entirely clear. Assuming that ENT1 deficiency does indeed increase JGA adenosine levels, one would have to conclude that a chronic elevation of local adenosine levels renders the generation of a TGF signal less efficient. It is possible that persistently high adenosine concentrations lead to A1AR receptor desensitization and subsequent nonresponsiveness. Receptor desensitization is a characteristic of most G protein-coupled receptors including A1AR although expressed native or recombinant A1ARs desensitize relatively slowly, over a time frame of hours to days rather than minutes (25, 26). Desensitized A1AR in ENT1−/− mice could explain the absence of changes in GFR that have previously been reported to result from an acute infusion of adenosine (24). In addition, we have demonstrated earlier that a number of vasodilators reduce TGF responses in an apparently nonspecific fashion (30, 31). While direct evidence for a reduced renal vascular resistance in the ENT1-deficient mice is lacking, it is conceivable that the increased adenosine levels exert a dilatory influence that might reduce TGF efficiency nonspecifically. Administration of dilazep has been noted to cause a lasting increase of renal blood flow accompanied by vasodilatation of both afferent and efferent arterioles, and these changes were prevented by inhibition of adenosine receptors (18, 39). Vasodilatation is also the net effect of prolonged elevations of circulating adenosine levels although it is not clear whether the distal afferent arteriolar TGF effector site participates in this relaxation (12). Lastly, it is appropriate to consider the original proposal that has linked an increased luminal NaCl concentration and the subsequently enhanced NaCl transport with increased cellular adenosine levels since transport-dependent increases in energy expenditure would lead to augmented ATP utilization and adenosine formation (22, 23). In this proposal, ENT-mediated nucleoside transport from intra- to extracellular space would obviously play a central part that could not be filled in the ENT1-deficient mice. This possibility cannot be refuted definitively without measurements of adenosine in the juxtaglomerular interstitium. The direct evidence in support of a role of extracellular adenosine formation by ATPases and 5′-nucleotidase would seem to argue against this interesting hypothesis although the isolated absence of either CD39 or CD73 did not fully eliminate TGF responsiveness (3, 13, 20). Thus a transient reversal of the transmembrane adenosine flux from the NaCl activated macula densa cells could potentially contribute to local extracellular adenosine levels. A comparable example may be the recent evidence showing that the increase of extracellular adenosine during enhanced neuronal activity is the result of neuronal adenosine release rather than ATP dephosphorylation (17). Independent of the exact causes for the reduced TGF responsiveness the present findings suggest that ENT1 expression levels may contribute to setting TGF efficiency. For example, the downregulation of ENT1 by hypoxia-inducible factor-1α may protect GFR in hypoxic conditions through attenuation of the GFR-restraining actions of TGF (6).

To reduce the chances that differences in the genetic background may confound the phenotype under study, the ENT1 null mutation was bred into C57Bl/6 and SWR/J backgrounds. No major modification of the TGF phenotype associated with ENT1 deficiency was detected although maximum TGF responses were numerically greater in SWR/J than C57Bl/6 WT mice. Thus we conclude that the altered TGF phenotype is genuinely due to the absence of ENT1. Arterial blood pressure has been found to affect TGF responses, but there were not detectable differences in systemic hemodynamics between WT and ENT1-deficient mice. Downregulation of A1AR or upregulation of dilatory A2AR in ENT1-deficient mice could have explained our findings, but no changes of adenosine receptor expression, at least at the mRNA level, were found in these animals. This is consistent with earlier studies in guinea pigs showing that a 2-wk administration of dipyridamole did not change adenosine receptor binding activities in the kidney (36). It would also seem conceivable that A1AR are mostly occupied in ENT1-deficient mice so that the TGF signal-induced adenosine does not find enough free receptors for acute binding. However, acute exposure of A1AR to an excess of the A1AR agonist CHA did not reduce TGF strength unless endogenous adenosine formation was inhibited at the same time (34). Nevertheless, the effect of prolonged activation of A1AR by CHA or adenosine on TGF responsiveness has not been examined. Finally, accelerated degradation of adenosine may affect TGF responses since an upregulation of adenosine deaminase has been found in microvascular endothelial cells of ENT1-deficient mice (2). This possibility cannot be excluded although we did not find an increased expression of adenosine deaminase mRNA in kidney tissue.

In summary, our data show that the chronic absence of ENT1-mediated nucleoside transport and the resulting elevation of extracellular adenosine levels are associated with a marked reduction of the TGF response to changes in luminal NaCl concentration. This may be another example where interference with NaCl-dependent cycling of interstitial mediator concentrations leads to an altered ability of afferent arterioles to respond normally to changes of luminal NaCl concentration.

GRANTS

This work was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Intramural Research Program.

DISCLOSURES

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the author(s).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Author contributions: L.L., D.M., Y.H., C.E., M.H., and J.S. performed experiments; L.L., D.M., C.E., M.H., and J.S. analyzed data; L.L., M.T., and J.S. interpreted results of experiments; L.L. and J.S. prepared figures; L.L., D.M., Y.H., C.E., M.H., M.T., and J.S. approved final version of manuscript; M.T. and J.B.S. edited and revised manuscript; J.S. conception and design of research; J.S. drafted manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are greatly indebted to Dr. Doo-Sup Choi (Department of Molecular and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN) for generously supplying breeder pairs of the ENT1-deficient mice.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Baldwin SA, Beal PR, Yao SY, King AE, Cass CE, Young JD. The equilibrative nucleoside transporter family, SLC29. Pflügers Arch 447: 735–743, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bone DB, Choi DS, Coe IR, Hammond JR. Nucleoside/nucleobase transport and metabolism by microvascular endothelial cells isolated from ENT1−/− mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 299: H847–H856, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Castrop H, Huang Y, Hashimoto S, Mizel D, Hansen P, Theilig F, Bachmann S, Deng C, Briggs J, Schnermann J. Impairment of tubuloglomerular feedback regulation of GFR in ecto-5′-nucleotidase/CD73-deficient mice. J Clin Invest 114: 634–642, 2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Choi DS, Cascini MG, Mailliard W, Young H, Paredes P, McMahon T, Diamond I, Bonci A, Messing RO. The type 1 equilibrative nucleoside transporter regulates ethanol intoxication and preference. Nat Neurosci 7: 855–861, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Damaraju VL, Elwi AN, Hunter C, Carpenter P, Santos C, Barron GM, Sun X, Baldwin SA, Young JD, Mackey JR, Sawyer MB, Cass CE. Localization of broadly selective equilibrative and concentrative nucleoside transporters, hENT1 and hCNT3, in human kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 293: F200–F211, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Eltzschig HK, Abdulla P, Hoffman E, Hamilton KE, Daniels D, Schonfeld C, Loffler M, Reyes G, Duszenko M, Karhausen J, Robinson A, Westerman KA, Coe IR, Colgan SP. HIF-1-dependent repression of equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT) in hypoxia. J Exp Med 202: 1493–1505, 2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Elwi AN, Damaraju VL, Baldwin SA, Young JD, Sawyer MB, Cass CE. Renal nucleoside transporters: physiological and clinical implications. Biochem Cell Biol 84: 844–858, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Faulhaber-Walter R, Chen L, Oppermann M, Kim SM, Huang Y, Hiramatsu N, Mizel D, Kajiyama H, Zerfas P, Briggs JP, Kopp JB, Schnermann J. Lack of A1 adenosine receptors augments diabetic hyperfiltration and glomerular injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 19: 722–730, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Graham K, Yao S, Johnson L, Mowles D, Ng A, Wilkinson J, Young JD, Cass CE. Nucleoside transporter gene expression in wild-type and mENT1 knockout mice. Biochem Cell Biol 89: 236–245, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Grenz A, Bauerle JD, Dalton JH, Ridyard D, Badulak A, Tak E, McNamee EN, Clambey E, Moldovan R, Reyes G, Klawitter J, Ambler K, Magee K, Christians U, Brodsky KS, Ravid K, Choi DS, Wen J, Lukashev D, Blackburn MR, Osswald H, Coe IR, Nurnberg B, Haase VH, Xia Y, Sitkovsky M, Eltzschig HK. Equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1) regulates postischemic blood flow during acute kidney injury in mice. J Clin Invest 122: 693–710, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 11. Hagemeier E, Kemper K, Boos KS, Schlimme E. On-line high-performance liquid affinity chromatography-high-performance liquid chromatography analysis of monomeric ribonucleoside compounds in biological fluids. J Chromatogr 282: 663–669, 1983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hansen PB, Hashimoto S, Oppermann M, Huang Y, Briggs JP, Schnermann J. Vasoconstrictor and vasodilator effects of adenosine in the mouse kidney due to preferential activation of A1 or A2 adenosine receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 315: 1150–1157, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Huang DY, Vallon V, Zimmermann H, Koszalka P, Schrader J, Osswald H. Ecto-5′-nucleotidase (cd73)-dependent and -independent generation of adenosine participates in the mediation of tubuloglomerular feedback in vivo. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 291: F282–F288, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Kawabata M, Haneda M, Wang T, Imai M, Takabatake T. Effects of a nucleoside transporter inhibitor, dilazep, on renal microcirculation in rats. Hypertens Res 25: 615–621, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kong W, Engel K, Wang J. Mammalian nucleoside transporters. Curr Drug Metab 5: 63–84, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Li L, Lai EY, Huang YG, Eisner C, Mizel D, Wilcox CS, Schnermann JB. Renal afferent arteriolar and tubuloglomerular feedback reactivity in mice with conditional deletions of adenosine 1 receptors. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 303: F1166–F1175, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Lovatt D, Xu Q, Liu W, Takano T, Smith NA, Schnermann J, Tieu K, Nedergaard M. Neuronal adenosine release, and not astrocytic ATP release, mediates feedback inhibition of excitatory activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 6265–6270, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Nakamoto H, Ogasawara Y, Kajiya F. Visualisation of the effects of dilazep on rat afferent and efferent arterioles in vivo. Hypertens Res 31: 315–324, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ontyd J, Schrader J. Measurement of adenosine, inosine, and hypoxanthine in human plasma. J Chromatogr 307: 404–409, 1984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Oppermann M, Friedman DJ, Faulhaber-Walter R, Mizel D, Castrop H, Enjyoji K, Robson SC, Schnermann J. Tubuloglomerular feedback and renin secretion in NTPDase1/CD39-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 294: F965–F970, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Oppermann M, Qin Y, Lai EY, Eisner C, Li L, Huang Y, Mizel D, Fryc J, Wilcox CS, Briggs J, Schnermann J, Castrop H. Enhanced tubuloglomerular feedback in mice with vascular overexpression of A1 adenosine receptors. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 297: F1256–F1264, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Osswald H, Hermes HH, Nabakowski G. Role of adenosine in signal transmission of tubuloglomerular feedback. Kidney Int Suppl 12: S136–142, 1982 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Osswald H, Nabakowski G, Hermes H. Adenosine as a possible mediator of metabolic control of glomerular filtration rate. Int J Biochem 12: 263–267, 1980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Osswald H, Spielman WS, Knox FG. Mechanism of adenosine-mediated decreases in glomerular filtration rate in dogs. Circ Res 43: 465–469, 1978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Palmer TM, Benovic JL, Stiles GL. Molecular basis for subtype-specific desensitization of inhibitory adenosine receptors. Analysis of a chimeric A1-A3 adenosine receptor. J Biol Chem 271: 15272–15278, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Palmer TM, Stiles GL. Structure-function analysis of inhibitory adenosine receptor regulation. Neuropharmacology 36: 1141–1147, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Qi Z, Whitt I, Mehta A, Jin J, Zhao M, Harris RC, Fogo AB, Breyer MD. Serial determination of glomerular filtration rate in conscious mice using FITC-inulin clearance. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 286: F590–F596, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Rose JB, Naydenova Z, Bang A, Ramadan A, Klawitter J, Schram K, Sweeney G, Grenz A, Eltzschig H, Hammond J, Choi DS, Coe IR. Absence of equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 in ENT1 knockout mice leads to altered nucleoside levels following hypoxic challenge. Life Sci 89: 621–630, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Rosivall L, Mirzahosseini S, Toma I, Sipos A, Peti-Peterdi J. Fluid flow in the juxtaglomerular interstitium visualized in vivo. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 291: F1241–F1247, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Schnermann J. Vascular tone as a determinant of tubuloglomerular feedback responsiveness. In: The Juxtaglomerular Apparatus, edited by Persson AE, Boberg U. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1988, p. 167–176 [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Schnermann J, Todd KM, Briggs JP. Effect of dopamine on the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 258: F790–F798, 1990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Schnermann JB, Traynor T, Yang T, Huang YG, Oliverio MI, Coffman T, Briggs JP. Absence of tubuloglomerular feedback responses in AT1A receptor-deficient mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 273: F315–F320, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sollevi A, Ostergren J, Fagrell B, Hjemdahl P. Theophylline antagonizes cardiovascular responses to dipyridamole in man without affecting increases in plasma adenosine. Acta Physiol Scand 121: 165–171, 1984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Thomson S, Bao D, Deng A, Vallon V. Adenosine formed by 5′-nucleotidase mediates tubuloglomerular feedback. J Clin Invest 106: 289–298, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Vallon V, Osswald H. Dipyridamole prevents diabetes-induced alterations of kidney function in rats. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 349: 217–222, 1994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Williams EF. Plasticity of cardiovascular nucleoside transporters following chronic dipyridamole treatment. SAAS Bull Biochem Biotechnol 10: 19–24, 1997 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wright FS, Schnermann J. Interference with feedback control of glomerular filtration rate by furosemide, triflocin, and cyanide. J Clin Invest 53: 1695–1708, 1974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Yang JN, Tiselius C, Dare E, Johansson B, Valen G, Fredholm BB. Sex differences in mouse heart rate and body temperature and in their regulation by adenosine A1 receptors. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 190: 63–75, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Yukimura T, Miura K, Ito K, Yamamoto K. Renal vascular effects of dilazep antagonized by 3-isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 8: 649–655, 1986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES