Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 1;69:198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.063

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Significant differences between triggered and non-triggered acquisitions. Cumulative distribution of significances was calculated by summing the thresholded (p < 0.0005, uncorrected) co-registered significance maps of the subjects. Any given color-coded voxel was statistically significant in at least 1 subject (blue) but possibly in all subjects (red). The infant map is shown projected onto the Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center infant brain template (https://irc.cchmc.org/software/infant.php), the adult map is projected to the non-linear 1 mm MNI152 template of the FMRIB Software Library (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/) (A) Significant differences between triggered and non-triggered acquisitions in infants. (B) Significant differences between the first triggered and the non-triggered acquisition in adults. Comparing the non-triggered acquisition to the second triggered acquisition lead to similar results (not shown but see Table 2 for quantitative description) (C) Results of the control experiment where the two triggered acquisitions were statistically compared in adults.