The epidemiology of meningococcal disease in Latin America 1945–2010: an unpredictable and changing landscape

SUMMARY

Meningococcal disease is mostly endemic in Latin America, with periodic occurrences of outbreaks and epidemics over the last few decades. This literature review summarizes the available epidemiological data for this region between 1945 and 2010. Incidence rates and serogroup distribution differ from country to country and over time. Serogroups A, B, and C have all been major causes of meningococcal disease since the 1970s. In the last decade serogroups W135 and Y may now be emerging in certain countries, with serogroup A virtually disappearing. Although progress has been made in improving and coordinating the surveillance of invasive disease, the uniformity and quality of reported data reflect the fact that the current surveillance systems focus on passive rather than active reporting, hence the reliability of data may vary between countries. Consideration of vaccination policies to control meningococcal disease can only be made with a sufficient understanding of the changing epidemiology in the region.

INTRODUCTION

Meningococcal disease (MD) is a serious, rapidly developing and potentially fatal infection. The causative agent, Neisseria meningitidis (Nm), is commonly carried as part of the commensal microbiota in the upper respiratory tract of humans. However, occasionally the bacteria invade the bloodstream and cause serious invasive disease, manifesting as meningitis or septicaemia. For those patients who survive, a range of long-term sequelae may result from the infectious episode including hearing loss and amputation of limbs [1]. MD particularly affects children aged <5 years, especially infants. However, during outbreaks and epidemics, increased numbers of cases are often observed in adolescents and young adults [2].

Meningococci can be classified into different serogroups based on the antigenic properties of the polysaccharide capsule. To date, 13 serogroups of Nm have been identified, with serogroups A, B, C, W135, Y, and X accounting for virtually all cases of invasive disease [3, 4].

The epidemiology of MD is dynamic varying geographically both with time and serogroup. Most areas of the globe experience periods of endemic disease that are interrupted by hyperendemic periods and occasional epidemics [5]. Vaccination is considered the best control strategy for prevention of MD [6].

Epidemiological surveillance is particularly important for monitoring changes in incidence and serogroup distribution over time. Specifically in Latin America, the Pan American Health Organisation established the Sistema Regional de Vacunas (SIREVA) network in 1993, initially to monitor Streptococcus pneumoniae across the participating Latin American countries. This was extended to cover Haemophilus influenzae in 1997 and Nm was added in 2000; today, more than 20 countries in Latin America take part in this surveillance programme. However, the quality of (passive) surveillance and level of disease ascertainment varies by country across the region, with Brazil currently contributing the majority of data. The reliability of the data available for MD may therefore vary among countries in terms of completeness and accuracy.

Meningococcal polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccines represent a major advance in MD prevention. Unlike plain polysaccharide vaccines, they can induce immunological memory providing an excellent boosting effect on re-exposure [7]. Meningococcal C conjugate vaccines have also been shown to prevent nasopharyngeal carriage and reduce transmission of Nm such that unvaccinated individuals are protected indirectly through a herd immunity effect [8, 9], which also increases the cost-effectiveness of vaccination programmes [10]. While evidence is only currently available for monovalent serogroup C conjugate vaccines, this is assumed to be a class effect that extends to other meningococcal conjugate vaccines that also use polysaccharide capsular antigens. However, the ability of new meningococcal vaccines to induce herd immunity that use alternative antigens will need to be demonstrated.

Due to the dynamic and unpredictable nature of the meningococcal epidemiology, combination conjugate vaccines against multiple meningococcal serogroups have been developed to broaden protection against the disease. The recent licensure of quadrivalent ACWY conjugate vaccines will build on current vaccine options to help achieve the most important goal of broad serogroup protection coverage [11]. However, the need for a broadly protective vaccine against serogroup B meningococci, a frequent cause of invasive MD in many parts of the world, remains important and is necessitating alternative approaches for vaccine development as the serogroup B capsular polysaccharide is poorly immunogenic [12, 13].

Historically, meningococcal vaccines have not been included in routine programs in Latin America, although mass vaccination campaigns have been implemented to control outbreaks and epidemics [14, 15]. A notable exception is the routine infant vaccination programme that has been implemented in Cuba since the 1980s; this vaccination programme administers a vaccine comprising the serogroup C capsular polysaccharide and the outer membrane vesicles of serogroup B meningococcus [16]. Although this vaccine has been used elsewhere in Latin America (Colombia, Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina) for outbreak control [17–19], its potential for wider routine use is compromised by its limited serotype specificity for the serogroup B meningococcus and lack of evidence of protection in children aged <2 years [20]. However, in 2011 Brazil became the first country in the region to introduce a meningococcal C conjugate vaccine into the infant vaccination schedule, with two doses in the first year, at ages 3 and 5 months, and a booster dose at 12 months. Toddlers aged between 12 and 23 months receive one dose of the vaccine. At this moment no catch-up campaign for older age groups is planned [21].

This review assessed the extent of the available published epidemiological information for the Latin America region over the period 1945–2010, including examining information relating to epidemics and outbreaks, incidence and case-fatality rates (CFRs), carriage, serogroup distribution, and mortality and morbidity associated with MD, in order to describe the fluctuating nature of the disease both across the continent and through time.

Searching and data availability

Studies included in this review were identified through searches of the literature databases Medline, EMBASE, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences), HISA (Latin American and Caribbean History of Public Health) and MEDCARIB (Caribbean Health Sciences Literature) from database start up to June 2010, combining search terms for Epidemiology AND Meningococcal Disease AND Latin America and the Caribbean in Spanish, Portuguese and English for the period 1945–2010. A detailed search strategy is provided in online Supplementary Table S1. The reference lists of relevant articles were used to identify further citations of interest. Additional searches were conducted of the websites of national and international public health agencies. English, Spanish and Portuguese language publications were included.

Abstracts from literature databases, subsequently sourced full publications and information on websites were evaluated for inclusion if the source provided information on the incidence of disease, occurrence of outbreaks/epidemics or mortality rates for MD in Latin American and Caribbean countries for period 1945–2010. Information from these studies was extracted relevant to each component of the study objective and described in a qualitative manner.

The searches conducted indicate that there is a lack of more historical data available in the published literature for some countries. Despite intensive searching there were no incidence data available on invasive MD in several countries in the region. This lack of data is likely to reflect the lack of a formal surveillance system to chart epidemics in these countries and also the presence of endemic disease. In contrast, the monitoring of and research into MD is well-developed in other countries, including Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Cuba, leading to more extensive data availability for these countries. Therefore, while MD surveillance is improving in the region, caution is needed when interpreting data from those countries where there are less well-developed surveillance systems and available data may be more limited [22].

Epidemic and endemic disease and the changing serogroup distribution, 1970–2010

Very limited data on the epidemiology of MD in Latin America were available prior to the 1970s (Table 1). Data for Mexico and Brazil associated with epidemics were identified for the late 1940s, with about 753 registered cases in Mexico seen for the period 1945–1949 [23] and a serogroup A epidemic from 1945 to 1951 in Sao Paulo, Brazil with incidence rates of 4·6–24·2 cases/100 000 inhabitants [24, 25]. Due to scarcity of more historical data, the following sections focus on the epidemiology from 1970 onwards.

Table 1.

Incidence and case-fatality rates of meningococcal disease, with serogroup specific information, if available, in several countries in Latin America (arranged by country and year)

Ref.	Region	Year of observation	Incidence	CFR	Serogroup information
Mexico
[67]	Mexico	1993–2003	Low incidence	NR	NR
[68]	Mexico	1990–2004	0–78 cases/year	NR	NR
[26]	Mexico	1990–2002	0–73 cases/year	NR	NR
		2003–2008	52–82 cases/year	NR	NR
Cuba
[69]	Cuba		0·3–0·7/100 000	0–10·5%	NR
[32]	Cuba	1983	14·4/100 000	NR	100% B
		1992	1·4/100 000
Panama
[70]	Panama	1990	4·6/100 000	NR	NR
		2008	1/100 000	NR	NR
Costa Rica
[45]	Costa Rica	1970–1973	2·4–7·8/100 000	11–18%	NR
Brazil
North
[71]	Manaus, Amazonas	1998–2002	7·8/100 000	14%	2002: 78·2% B, 7·2% C
North-East
[72]	Salvador (Bahia)	1996–2001	1·24–2·23/100 000	8%	82% B, 16% C, 2% W135, 0·3% Y
South
[73]	Rio Grande do Sul	1995–2003	1·8–3·5/100 000	17%	79% B, 14·1% C, 6·2% W135, 0·7% Other
[55]	Rio Grande do Sul	2003–2005	1·54/100 000	NR	64% B, 18% C, 17% W135, 1% Y
[74]	Santa Catarina	1988–1991	1·8–5·4/100 000	19·6%	1989–1990 B epidemic
[15]	Santa Catarina	1971–1975 (epidemic)	9·6/100 000	21·1%	NR
		1976–1985 (endemic)	3·2/100 000	20·6%	1981–1985: B 83·9%, C 2·1%, Other 14%
		1986–2000 (epidemic)	7·4/100 000	15·2%	B 69·1%, C 27·7%, Other 3·2%
[47]	Curitiba	1989	2·14/100 000	NR	B 70·6%, C 23·5%, Other 5·9%
	Parana	1990	10·45/100 000		Epidemic of B 17·9%, C 82·1%, Other 0%
		1991	6·5/100 000	NR	B 29·3%, C 70·7%, Other 0%
South-East
[33]	Sao Paulo	1977	3·3/100 000	NR	NR
		1982	1·05/100 000	NR	NR
		1990	5·4/100 000	NR	NR
[46]	Sao Paulo		Overall 11·3/100 000	9·2%
[25]	Sao Paulo	1920–26 (epidemic)	4·7–12·2/100 000	NR	NR
		1945–51 (epidemic)	4·6–24·2/100 000	NR	NR
		1971–76 (epidemic)	5·9–180/100 000	NR	NR
		1988–2000 (epidemic)	4·4–8·25/100 000	NR	NR
[75]	Sao Paulo	1958–19676	NR	19·1%	NR
		1968–1972		13·7%	NR
		1958–1972 (total)		15·3%	NR
[76]	Campinas Sao Paulo	1993–1998	NR	17·3%
[77]	Rio de Janeiro	1976–1979 (post- epidemic)	3·51/100 000	18·4%	A 63·4%, B 4·9%, C 31·7%
		1980–1986 (Endemic)	1·67/100 000	16·2%	A 38·3%, B 44·4%, C 17·3%
		1987–1994 (Epidemic)	6·53/100 000	16·4%	A 1·1%, B 80·1%, C 18·8%
[50]	Whole country	2000–2010	2·52–1·36/100 000	20%	NR
Colombia
[78]	Colombia	1995–1998	0·6–0·8/100 000	NR	NR
Uruguay
[19]	Canelones	2000–2001	1·5/1 000 000	27% (epidemic)	NR
		2001–2002	3·4/100 000	NR	NR
		After vaccination	1·8/100 000	12·5%	NR
	Montevideo	2000–2001	1·5/1 000 000	5%	NR
		2001–2002	2·3/100 000	10%	NR
		After vaccination	1·8/100 000	4·5%	NR
Argentina
[79]	Argentina	1990–2003	0·6–2·9/100 000	NR	NR
[80]	Argentina	(not specified)	0·7/100 000	NR	NR
Chile
[14]	Iquique	1979–1987	Attack rate >20/ 100 000/year during serogroup B outbreak	5·7%	NR
[81]	Santiago	1994	1993: 5·9/100 000 (epidemic)	NR	NR
[58]	Chile	2009	0·6/100 000	8·9%	NR

CFR, Case-fatality rate; NR, not recorded.

In comparison with those countries experiencing high incidence and epidemics during the past 40 years, some countries in Latin America have only experienced low-level endemic rates of MD. Notably, Mexico has remained relatively unaffected since the 1940s and reports very low incidence of disease [23, 26]. SINAVE (Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia Epidemiológica) registered an average of 65 confirmed cases per year between 2003 and 2009 and, based on a total of 60 reported cases in 2006, a national incidence of 0·056 cases/100 000 has been estimated. However, a recent hospital-based active surveillance study performed on the border of Mexico and the USA suggested that the incidence in this region and in the rest of Mexico may be substantially higher than previously reported, with 3·08 and 0·69 cases/100 000 children aged <17 years estimated during 2005–2008 in Tijuana and San Diego, respectively [27].

While the current incidence of endemic MD in Latin America is typically <2 cases/100 000 population per year [21], epidemic disease has broken out in all parts of Latin America at different times during the past 40 years. The reported epidemics and outbreak clusters identified in the literature are displayed in Figure 1. Of Latin America as a whole, Brazil has reported the most outbreaks and epidemics, although this may be partly attributed to the existence of a well-established surveillance system. The available data highlight the occurrence of MD epidemics in Latin America associated with different serogroups and reflect the unpredictable nature of MD epidemiology.

Fig. 1.

Chronological overview of epidemics and outbreaks in Latin America by serogroup. Serogroups associated with each epidemic or outbreak are listed alongside the year of the event and the country. The occurrence of serogroup A is shown in light grey, serogroup C in dark grey, serogroup B is highlighted in white, and serogroup W135 in black.

Serogroup A

Although serogroup A is now extremely rare on the continent [28], serogroup A epidemics with high incidence rates were reported in the 1970s [24, 25]. In 1974, the spread of a serogroup A epidemic strain during an existing serogroup C epidemic period in Sao Paulo, Brazil resulted in incidence estimates as high as 180 cases/100 000 population per year [24, 25]. This epidemic provided the first major experience with polysaccharide A and C vaccines on a large scale, resulting in the successful control of the epidemic [25]. Serogroup A was also the dominant serogroup in an MD outbreak in southern Chile in 1978/1979 with an incidence estimate of 21 cases/100 000 population per year [14, 29]. Following vaccination with polysaccharide A and C vaccine, MD incidence levels in Chile reverted to background levels of 0·8–1·1 cases/100 000 population per year [14].

Serogroup B

Serogroup B epidemics were reported in several Latin American countries in the 1980s, associated with the international spread of epidemic clones of the ET5/ST32 type previously responsible for outbreaks in Europe and the USA [30]. This clone was associated with epidemic disease in Cuba, with a peak incidence of 14 cases/100 000 reported in 1983 [31]. The most prevalent strain in this outbreak was B:4:P1.19,15:L3,7,9, belonging to the ET5 type [32]. This strain was also important in epidemics in Brazil in the late 1980s [33, 34], and was identified as dominant in Brazil in the 1990s [35]. An outbreak of serogroup B MD in Iquique, Chile, progressed rapidly in the early 1980s and reached incidence rates of over 20/100 000 population per year [14]. The outbreak was attributed to the B:15:P1.3 strain, which belongs to the same genetic clone of the ET5 type as the Cuban strain [14].

The Cuban B (outer membrane vesicles)/C (polysaccharide) vaccine was developed in response to the serogroup B epidemic in 1983 (based on the prevalent serotype at that time in Cuba) and was used in a mass vaccination programme during 1987–1989 [36]. This was associated with a decreased incidence of MD [36] and, in 1991, the vaccine was incorporated into the Cuban routine national immunization programme. This vaccine was also used in other Latin American countries in subsequent years in response to serogroup B epidemics, such as in Brazil [18, 37], Uruguay [19], and Colombia [38]. However, various studies estimating the effectiveness of the Cuban B/C vaccine suggest that it does not provide protection against heterologous strains, and only provides modest protection in young children [17–20, 37].

Before the introduction of the SIREVA network in 2000, limited information on endemic serogroup prevalence was identified from the published literature. Those studies that are available indicate that serogroup B was the most prevalent endemic disease serogroup pre-2000 in several countries in Latin America, including Colombia (78% of isolates identified between 1994 and 2006) [39], Chile (over 90% of isolates identified between 1992 and 1993) [40], Brazil [21] and Uruguay [19, 41]. However, although the incidence of MD in Cuba after the introduction of vaccination remained at <1·4 cases/100 000 population per year from 1992 onwards, a sample of 111 isolates tested from subsequent years indicated that serogroup B, particularly the B:4:P1.15 serotype, remained the dominant cause of disease [32].

Since the inclusion of Nm in the SIREVA surveillance network in 2000, information on the number of serogroup isolates across Latin America has been more readily available, although caveats of reliability apply. Since then, serogroup B has been common in Cuba, Chile, Argentina and Uruguay [28, 42–44].

Serogroup C

Outbreaks of serogroup C MD were reported in the 1970s in Costa Rica, with an incidence of 2·4 cases/100 000 population per year reported in 1970 increasing to 7·8 cases/100 000 population per year in 1971/1972 [45]. However the majority of serogroup C outbreaks and epidemics have been reported in Brazil [15, 46, 47]. Molecular analyses have identified two major serogroup C clones circulating in greater Sao Paulo, Brazil, that were associated with these MD outbreaks during the period 1976–2000 [48]. Initially, the ST11 complex (serotype 2a strain) was identified in 1976 and may have been responsible for a serogroup C epidemic in the early 1970s. This was replaced by the ET11 complex (serotype 2b strain) in 1989/1990, which may have subsequently been responsible for epidemic disease [47, 49]. Outbreaks of serogroup C disease were identified in Curitiba, the capital of Parana state in Brazil, that reached a peak incidence of 10 cases/100 000 population in 1990 [47]. Further serogroup C epidemics were reported in Rio de Janeiro during 1993–1995 [49] and from 2002 onwards a significant increase in the proportion of cases attributed to serogroup C (ST103 complex) was observed. Currently, serogroup C is the most frequently observed serogroup causing MD in Brazil [21]. Most recently, several outbreaks of MD caused by serogroup C that affected various cities in Brazil were registered [21].

As a consequence of the current epidemiological situation and also of ongoing serogroup C outbreaks in Brazil, the meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine was introduced into the routine infant vaccine schedule in Brazil in late 2010 [50].

Serogroup C has also been an important contributor to endemic disease, particularly during the late 1990s and early 2000s. For example, Argentina saw an increase in serogroup C disease in the 1990s, overtaking serogroup B during the period 1995–2001 [21, 51]. Similarly, serogroup C was an important contributor to disease in Sao Paulo, Brazil, during the period 1990–2002 [48]. Since 2000, Colombia and Brazil have reported increases in serogroup C disease [44].

Serogroup W135

Before 2000, disease caused by serogroup W135 was rarely observed in Latin America. However, there is now evidence to suggest that serogroup W135 may have emerged in Argentina and Chile, with the prevalence of this serogroup increasing from no cases in 2001 to 31% of total cases by November 2011 [52] within Chile and from 2% of cases with confirmed serogroup in 2000 to 37% in 2008 and 47% in 2009 within Argentina [28, 44, 53]. Clusters of MD cases resulting from serogroup W135 have also been reported in Brazil [54, 55]. The emergence of serogroup W135 in Latin America has been linked to the hypervirulent Hajj clone W135:P1.5,2:ST11 (ST11/ET37 clonal complex), which emerged in 2000 and has since spread internationally [54, 55]. In addition to outbreaks and epidemics, this Hajj clone has also been associated with high CFRs in South Africa [56].

Serogroup Y

Serogroup Y emerged in North America in the mid-1990s and now causes about one third of all MD occurring in the USA [7]. Prior to the 21st century serogroup Y disease was seldom observed in Latin America. However, since 2003, serogroup Y MD has been increasingly reported in Colombia, possibly accounting for half of all those cases confirmed in 2006 [39]. Similarly, a slight increase in the incidence of serogroup Y MD has also been reported recently in Venezuela, Argentina, Costa Rica, Chile, and Uruguay [28, 42–44]. Molecular characterization of isolates has identified that the serogroup Y isolates found in Colombia and Costa Rica are similar to those prevalent in the USA, suggesting spread within the wider American continent, with the majority belonging to the ST23 clonal complex [57]. In contrast, the isolates found in Argentina relate predominantly to a different clonal complex, indicating that these strains may have been introduced by other routes.

Case fatality

CFRs between 10% and 20% have been reported in recent years in several countries within Latin America, including Chile (14% in 2010) [58], Argentina (7% − 15%) [59], Panama (12·5%) [60], Mexico (18% in 2005–2008) [27] and Uruguay (15%) [61]. Furthermore, a notably high case fatality (∼20%) continues to be reported in Brazil despite the increasing availability of intensive-care units and improvements in healthcare. During the recent outbreaks in Brazil that have mostly been associated with serogroup C, particularly high case fatality risks of about 40% have been reported [62]. In general the CFR for MD is considered to be on average ∼10% (with no consistent difference observed by global region) which is somewhat lower in comparison to those data currently available for Latin America. Possible reasons for these high CFR, particularly in Brazil, remain speculative and could be related to lack of timely access to healthcare facilities in determined regions of the country. Furthermore, since 2002 Brazil has reported a significant increase in the number and proportion of cases attributed to serogroup C that is associated with a new clonal complex, ST103, which is not commonly observed globally at present [48]. Emergence of new virulent clones might be associated with high incidence rates and increased CFRs among susceptible populations.

Carriage

Very limited published data describing carriage of Nm in Latin America are currently available. Of the published data identified, information relating to carriage is limited to children and adolescents from small populations residing within limited geographical areas [63, 64]. A carriage prevalence of 1·9% in children and 2·9% in adolescents was reported in Mexico [64], with Nm serogroups C and Y being the most frequently detected. Similarly, carriage of Nm was found to be 1·5% in a sample of schoolchildren in Venezuela [63].

Understanding carriage of the meningococcus represents a major knowledge gap both regionally within Latin America and globally, with various key issues requiring further investigation that are also currently hampered by a lack of standard methodology [65]. However, while existing data mainly generated in European populations [65] are considered limited and are now becoming historical, a key conclusion is that age appears to be a key determinant of meningococcal carriage prevalence, often peaking in adolescents and young adults, and is important for understanding the epidemiology and transmission dynamics of meningococcal infection [66]. Further carriage studies in Latin America to investigate carriage prevalence by age may therefore be valuable to confirm those key age groups in the region involved in transmission and also assess the extent to which existing data are relevant to Latin American populations. The availability of regionally representative carriage data will also be useful for assessing more precisely the extent and potential that exists for inducing herd immunity in Latin American populations. This will help informed decisions to be made should vaccination strategies need to be considered within the region that optimize the herd protection that not only those currently available meningococcal conjugate vaccines are able to provide but also for new meningococcal vaccines that may become available that have potential to induce herd protection.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the dynamic and unpredictable nature of MD epidemiology over time (1945 to present) and between the countries within this region. There were important limitations in the availability of published data for some countries, particularly for earlier time periods, which limit the conclusions that can be drawn on the changing epidemiology of MD in Latin America over time.

Although progress has been made in improving and coordinating the surveillance of invasive disease with the implementation of a laboratory surveillance network (SIREVA), under-reporting may be prevalent and the amount of information is variable across Latin America. The low rates of MD and the high proportion of meningitis without an identified bacterial cause reported by several countries reflect the lack of access to hospital care and the limitations in obtaining adequate samples for culture in most of the region. This results in underestimation of the real burden and may impact the understanding of the serogroup distribution of MD in Latin America.

As well as differences in reporting due to variation in access to hospitals and laboratories, it is also possible that different case definitions may be used for MD in Latin American countries, making comparisons across the region unreliable. A standardized case definition combining WHO criteria with confirmatory laboratory diagnosis, e.g. by real-time PCR is needed to provide accurate estimates of the true burden of MD in the region.

Evidence suggests that serogroup A disease has virtually disappeared from Latin America. Serogroups B and C are currently responsible for the majority of cases reported in the region. A significant rise in the proportion of cases due to serogroup C, associated with the ST103 complex, occurred recently in Brazil, where it currently represents 80% of cases, while in Chile, Uruguay and in most countries from Central America and the Caribbean the majority of cases are due to serogroup B. There is recent evidence of the emergence of serogroup W135, associated with the ST11 complex, in Argentina, especially in the province of Buenos Aires, and it has also been observed in regions of Brazil and Chile. Additionally, serogroup Y has been observed in Colombia, where in 2006 it represented almost 50% of the isolates identified. Venezuela has also recently reported an increase in the proportion of cases due to serogroup Y. However, various countries may substantially under-report the annual number of cases, suggesting current estimates of serogroup distribution should be viewed with some caution.

The lack of carriage data in the Latin American region represents a major knowledge gap. There may be a role for wider contemporary carriage studies within the region to help further understand the epidemiology and identify key transmission groups so that vaccine strategies can be considered that maximize potential herd protection that can be obtained using meningococcal conjugate vaccines.

Historically, plain polysaccharide vaccines have been used in Latin America to control MD outbreaks and epidemics and were not included as part of universal routine vaccination programmes. Exceptions where routine vaccination was adopted include Cuba and more recently Brazil, which became the first country in the region to introduce meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine into its routine schedule. With the emergence of the previously rare serogroups W135 and Y, against which susceptibility of the population is expected, and the now wider availability of quadrivalent A, C, W135 and Y polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccines, the potential to consider strategies that provide broader protection and maximize potential herd protection exists. The currently investigational recombinant protein vaccines against serogroup B disease are likely to become available in the next years, broadening the possibility of protection against the disease.

In conclusion, Neisseria meningitidis remains an important cause of disease in Latin America with evidence suggesting a dynamic epidemiology. Informed decisions for appropriate vaccination strategies to control MD can only be made with a sufficient understanding of the changing epidemiology in the region and the availability of appropriate data. Therefore, there is a need to improve and establish more uniform quality surveillance across the region.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Supplementary information supplied by authors.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

M.S. has received consultation and lecture fees from Baxter, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi-Pasteur and Wyeth. S.A. has received consultation fees from GlaxoSmithKline, payment for expert testimony from Sanofi-Pasteur and Novartis, and for development of educational presentations from Pfizer. A.J. and H.W. are employees of Heron Evidence Development Ltd which received funding from GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals to conduct research for this study and to provide writing assistance for this manuscript. C.M. and A.V. are employees of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, which has a quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine approved by EMA in April 2012.