Abstract
Cu-catalyzed A3 coupling of ethoxyacetylene, pyrrolidine and salicylaldehydes led to a concomitant cycloisomerization followed by hydrolysis of the resultant vinyl ether to afford coumarins in a cascade process. The reaction proceeded through exclusive 6-endo-dig cyclization and is compatible with halo and keto groups giving coumarins in good to moderate yields.
Keywords: A3 coupling, cooperative catalysis, coumarin synthesis, cycloisomerization, transition-metal catalysts
Introduction
An alkyne, an aldehyde and an amine coupling, referred to as A3 coupling [1], has been found as an efficient method for C–N and C–C bond formation that results in equivalence of reductive alkylation of amines while at the same time appending an alkyne, i.e., a highly useful moiety for further functionlization. This three-component coupling has been accomplished with a very broad range of transition metals, including copper, silver, gold, ruthenium/copper, cobalt, iridium and iron. Similarly, cycloisomerization of alkynols and alkynamines has also been an attractive approach for the synthesis of various known and new heterocyclic frameworks [2–22]. Various alkynophilic catalysts such as transition-metal catalysts (based on gold, mercury, platinum, silver, etc.), Brønsted acids and electrophilic iodine sources (I2, ICl, NIS) have been used for the transformation.
If one of the partners in A3 coupling has any nucleophile for concomitant electrophilic cyclization on the alkyne group in the A3 product, this may result in an interesting reaction sequence to produce various heterocycles. Recently, Gevorgyan and co-workers [23] used these two processes (A3/5-exo-dig cycloisomerization) in tandem to obtain indolines, which were then converted to useful substituted indole derivatives (Scheme 1, (a)). Similarly, Patil and Raut [24] reported an elegant method for the synthesis of 2-substituted quinolines from 2-aminobenzaldehydes and terminal alkynes by a tandem A3/6-endo-dig-cycloisomerization (Scheme 1, (b)) using a cooperative catalytic system consisting of CuI and pyrrolidine. Prior to these two findings, Sakai et al. [25] reported a facile synthesis of 3-aminobenzofurans through an A3 coupling and an exclusive 5-exo-dig-cycloisomerization (Scheme 1, (c)). Similarly, Yan and Liu [26], Fujii et al. [27–28], Chernyk and Gevorgyan [29], Ji et al. [30], and Wu et al. [31] reported the synthesis of aminoindolizines, 2-(aminomethyl)indoles, imidazopyridines, butenolides and 1,2-dihydroisoquinoline derivatives, respectively, combining these two approaches successfully. Along the same lines, we investigated a reaction between ethoxyacetylene, pyrrolidine and salicylaldehyde in the presence of a transition-metal catalyst. That, after consecutive A3 coupling, cycloisomerization and hydrolysis of the resultant vinyl ether intermediate, should produce coumarins (Scheme 1, (d)). The reason for the selective 6-endo-dig cyclization of such a cooperative-catalysis reaction has been well documented through DFT computational studies by Patil et al. in their recent publication [32].
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of various heterocycles by a tandem A3 coupling/cycloisomerization strategy.
Results and Discussion
Coumarins [33–46] have been attractive targets [47–53] for synthetic chemists due to their frequent occurrence in nature and for their interesting biological and pharmaceutical applications. In continuation of our interest in the cycloisomerization of alkynols and alkynamines for the synthesis of various heterocycles [17–22], we herein report the synthesis of coumarins from salicylaldehydes by a Cu-catalyzed exclusive 6-endo-dig electrophilic cyclization of the intermediate hydroxyphenylpropargylamine as shown in Scheme 1 (d). We initially investigated the reaction with various Cu-, Au- and Pd-based catalysts in the presence of pyrrolidine in MeCN at room temperature (Table 1).
Table 1.
Catalyst and condition screening.
![]() | |||||
| entry | catalyst | solvent/temp | base | Time (h) | yield (%) |
| 1 | CuI | CH3CN/rt | pyrrolidine | 24 | 58 |
| 2 | Cu(OTf)2 | CH3CN/rt | pyrrolidine | 24 | 24 |
| 3 | AuCl | CH3CN/rt | pyrrolidine | 24 | 35 |
| 4 | AuCl3 | CH3CN/rt | pyrrolidine | 24 | 48 |
| 5 | HAuCl4 | CH3CN/rt | pyrrolidine | 24 | 50 |
| 6 | PPh3AuCl | CH3CN/rt | pyrrolidine | 24 | 30 |
| 7 | PdCl2 | CH3CN/rt | pyrrolidine | 24 | 25 |
| 8 | CuI | CH3CN/100 °C | pyrrolidine | 2 | 65 |
| 9 | — | CH3CN/100 °C | pyrrolidine | 3 | — |
| 10 | CuI | CH3CN/100 °C | pyrrolidine | 3 | — |
The required product was obtained but in very low yield, and the reaction time was prolonged to more than 24 h. When the reaction temperature was raised to 100 °C in the presence of CuI and pyrrolidine in CH3CN, the desired product was obtained in 65% in 2 h.
Encouraged by this promising result, the scope of the reaction was tested with a number of salicylaldehydes. As is apparent from Table 2, the reaction is highly versatile, working efficiently with both electron-rich and -poor substrates. Substrates 1b–h with various alkyl substituents produced the corresponding coumarins 2b–h in 50–82% yield.
Table 2.
Synthesis of coumarins 2 from salicylaldehydes 1 by A3 coupling/cycloisomerization.
![]() | |||||||
| entry | substrate 1a | product 2 | yield (%)b | entry | substrate 1a | product 2 | yield (%)b |
| 1 |
![]() 1a |
![]() 2a |
62 | 9 |
![]() 1i |
![]() 2i |
62 |
| 2 |
![]() 1b |
![]() 2b |
68 | 10 |
![]() 1j |
![]() 2j |
62 |
| 3 |
![]() 1c |
![]() 2c |
78 | 11 |
![]() 1k |
![]() 2k |
60 |
| 4 |
![]() 1d |
![]() 2d |
75 | 12 |
![]() 1l |
![]() 2l |
65 |
| 5 |
![]() 1e |
![]() 2e |
80 | 13 |
![]() 1m |
![]() 2m |
76 |
| 6 |
![]() 1f |
![]() 2f |
82 | 14 |
![]() 1n |
![]() 2n |
65 |
| 7 |
![]() 1g |
![]() 2g |
50 | 15 |
![]() 1o |
![]() 2o |
84 |
| 8 |
![]() 1h |
![]() 2h |
80 | ||||
aAll reactions were conducted with 1 mmol substrate in 0.25 M concentration. bIsolated yields.
A slight reduction in yield was observed in the cases of halogen containing substrates. Thus, substrates 1i–l gave the required products 2i–l in 62–65% yield. Substrates 1m and 1n with extended conjugation also reacted well under the standardized conditions to give the corresponding products 2m and 2n in good yields (65–76%). The reaction is highly compatible with keto functionality, as is evident from the conversion of 1o to 2o in 84% yield. It should be noted that the reaction is limited to aldehydes and not to ketones, which do not undergo A3 coupling.
A plausible mechanism via a cooperative catalysis by Cu and pyrrolidine is described in Scheme 2 (with the assistance of the work reported by Patil et al. [24,32]). Initial condensation of pyrrolidine with salicylaldehyde 1 produced iminium intermediate A. The addition of copper ethoxyacetylide, formed on the reaction of ethoxyacetylene with Cu, to the iminium intermediate A yielded propargylamine intermediate B. Copper being coordinated with the amine group immediately activated the alkyne group to facilitate cycloisomerization with the phenoxy group, to produce vinyl ether C, which, being susceptible to hydrolysis, underwent water addition followed by an extrusion of the pyrrolidine molecule for further catalysis. The resulted intermediate D lost an EtOH molecule to furnish the required product 2.
Scheme 2.
A plausible mechanistic pathway.
Conclusion
In summary, a facile synthesis of coumarins is reported from readily available starting materials, i.e., salicylaldehydes and ethoxyacetylene, through a tandem A3 coupling and cycloisomerization cascade. The reaction was catalyzed by a pyrrolidine and copper iodide cooperative catalytic system, and the reaction was not observed in the absence of either of the catalysts. The yields are good to moderate and the reaction has a good substrate scope being compatible with halogen and keto groups. The process constitutes an easy and efficient access to highly valuable building blocks of natural products or biologically active compounds.
Supporting Information
Experimental procedures and product characterization for compounds 2a–o.
Acknowledgments
We thank CSIR for the financial aid and Prof. Pierre Deslongchamps, emeritus professor at University of Laval, Canada, and Dr. T. K. Chakraborty, Director CSIR-CDRI for their constant encouragement. We thank SAIF division CDRI for the analytical data support. Generous financial aid from CSIR Network project "BSC0102" (CSIR-CDRI-THUNDER) is acknowledged. CDRI Communication NO. 8371.
References
- 1.Peshkov V A, Pereshivko O P, Van der Eycken E V. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:3790. doi: 10.1039/c2cs15356d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mothe S R, Kothandaraman P, Lauw S J L, Chin S M W C, Chan P W H. Chem–Eur J. 2012;18:6133. doi: 10.1002/chem.201200578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Inamoto K, Asano N, Nakamura Y, Yonemoto M, Kondo Y. Org Lett. 2012;14:2622. doi: 10.1021/ol300958c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tomás-Mendivil E, Toullec P Y, Diez J, Conejero S, Michelet V, Cadierno V. Org Lett. 2012;14:2520. doi: 10.1021/ol300811e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kothandaraman P, Mothe S R, Toh S S M, Chan P W H. J Org Chem. 2011;76:7633. doi: 10.1021/jo201208e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mancuso R, Mehta S, Gabriele B, Salerno G, Jenks W S, Larock R C. J Org Chem. 2010;75:897. doi: 10.1021/jo902333y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jiang B, Si Y-G. J Org Chem. 2002;67:9449. doi: 10.1021/jo0204606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gabriele B, Mancuso R, Salerno G, Lupinacci E, Ruffolo G, Costa M. J Org Chem. 2008;73:4971. doi: 10.1021/jo8006495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hessian K O, Flynn B L. Org Lett. 2006;8:243. doi: 10.1021/ol052518j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen Y, Cho C-H, Larock R C. Org Lett. 2009;11:173. doi: 10.1021/ol8021287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fischer D, Tomeba H, Pahadi N K, Patil N T, Huo Z, Yamamoto Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:15720. doi: 10.1021/ja805326f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Patil N T, Kavthe R D, Raut V S, Shinde V S, Sridhar B. J Org Chem. 2008;75:1277. doi: 10.1021/jo902293f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nishizawa M, Imagawa H, Yamamoto H. Org Biomol Chem. 2010;8:511. doi: 10.1039/b920434b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alcaide B, Almendros P, Alonso J M. Org Biomol Chem. 2011;9:4405. doi: 10.1039/c1ob05249g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huo Z, Gridnev I D, Yamamoto Y. J Org Chem. 2010;75:1266. doi: 10.1021/jo902603v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Huo Z, Yamamoto Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:3651. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.03.129. And the references therein. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Reddy M S, Kumar Y K, Thirupathi N. Org Lett. 2012;14:824. doi: 10.1021/ol2033493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reddy M S, Thirupathi N, Babu M H. Eur J Org Chem. 2012:5803. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.201200782. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reddy M S, Thirupathi N, Kumar Y K. RSC Adv. 2012;2:3986. doi: 10.1039/c2ra20213a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ravindar K, Reddy M S, Deslongchamps P. Org Lett. 2011;13:3178. doi: 10.1021/ol201102x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ravindar K, Reddy M S, Lindqvist L, Pelletier J, Deslongchamps P. J Org Chem. 2011;76:1269. doi: 10.1021/jo102054r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ravindar K, Reddy M S, Lindqvist L, Pelletier J, Deslongchamps P. Org Lett. 2010;12:4420. doi: 10.1021/ol1019663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chernyak D, Chernyak N, Gevorgyan V. Adv Synth Catal. 2010;352:961–966. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201000015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Patil N T, Raut V S. J Org Chem. 2010;75:6961. doi: 10.1021/jo101103a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sakai N, Uchida N, Konakahara T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008;49:3437. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.03.111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yan B, Liu Y. Org Lett. 2007;9:4323. doi: 10.1021/ol701886e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ohno H, Ohta Y, Oishi S, Fujii N. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2007;46:2295. doi: 10.1002/anie.200604342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ohta Y, Chiba H, Oishi S, Fujii N, Ohno H. J Org Chem. 2009;74:7052. doi: 10.1021/jo901328q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chernyk N, Gevorgyan V. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2010;49:2743. doi: 10.1002/anie.200907291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhang Q, Chang M, Hu X Y, Li B G, Ji J H. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:7256–7257. doi: 10.1021/ja101804p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ye Y, Ding Q, Wu J. Tetrahedron. 2008;64:1378–1382. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2007.11.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Patil N T, Nijamudheen A, Datta A. J Org Chem. 2012;77:6179. doi: 10.1021/jo300949d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Joule J A, Mills K. Heterocyclic Chemistry. 4th. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd; 2006. p. 170. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dayam R, Gundla R, Al-Mawsawi L Q, Neamati N. Med Res Rev. 2008;28:118. doi: 10.1002/med.20116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thuong P T, Hung T M, Ngoc T M, Ha D T, Min B S, Kwack S J, Kang T S, Choi J S, Bae K. Phytother Res. 2010;24:101. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kostova I. Curr Med Chem - Anti-Cancer Agents. 2005;5:29. doi: 10.2174/1568011053352550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Harris E B J, Banwell M G, Willis A C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011;52:6887. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.10.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Murray R D H. Nat Prod Rep. 1995;12:477. doi: 10.1039/np9951200477. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Estevez-Braun A, Gonzalez A G. Nat Prod Rep. 1997;14:465. doi: 10.1039/np9971400465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zorn J A, Wille H, Wolan D W, Wells J A. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:19630. doi: 10.1021/ja208350u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gordo J, Avo J, Parola A J, Lima J C, Pereira A, Branco P S. Org Lett. 2011;13:5112. doi: 10.1021/ol201983u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hamdi N, Saoud M, Romerosa A. 4-Hydroxy Coumarine: a Versatile Reagent for the Synthesis of Heterocyclic and Vanillin Ether Coumarins with Biological Activities. In: Khan M T H, editor. Topics in Heterocyclic Chemistry. Vol. 11. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2007. pp. 283–301. ((Topics in Heterocyclic Chemistry)). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Reutrakul V, Leewanich P, Tuchinda P, Pohmakotr M, Jaipetch T, Sophasan S, Santisuk T. Planta Med. 2003;69:1048. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-45154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Marcu M G, Chadli A, Bouhouche I, Catelli M, Neckers L M. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:37181. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003701200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bras G L, Radanyi C, Peyrat J-F, Brion J-D, Alami M, Marsaud V, Stella B, Renoir J-M. J Med Chem. 2007;50:6189. doi: 10.1021/jm0707774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Radanyi C, Bras G L, Messaoudi S, Bouclier C, Peyrat J-F, Brion J-D, Marsaud V, Renoir J-M, Alami M. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008;18:2495. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.01.128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Min M, Kim B, Hong S. Org Biomol Chem. 2012;10:2692. doi: 10.1039/c2ob07137a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Schmidt B, Krehl S. Chem Commun. 2011;47:5879. doi: 10.1039/c1cc11347j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Audisio D, Messaoudi S, Brion J-D, Alami M. Eur J Org Chem. 2010:1046. doi: 10.1002/ejoc.200901107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Upadhyay P K, Kumar P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:236. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.10.133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yamamoto Y, Kirai N. Org Lett. 2008;10:5513. doi: 10.1021/ol802239n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jia C, Piao D, Kitamura T, Fujiwara Y. J Org Chem. 2000;65:7516. doi: 10.1021/jo000861q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Trost B M, Toste F D, Greenman K. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:4518. doi: 10.1021/ja0286573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Experimental procedures and product characterization for compounds 2a–o.


































