Pathogenesis of HIV and the Lung

Abstract

Antiretroviral therapy has improved longevity for HIV-infected persons, but long-term HIV infection is now complicated by increased rates of chronic medical conditions including pulmonary disorders. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, asthma, and pulmonary hypertension are becoming common comorbidities of HIV infection, and these diseases may develop as a result of HIV-related risk factors such as antiretroviral drug toxicities, colonization by infectious organisms, HIV viremia, immune activation, or immune dysfunction. It also appears that the ability to control HIV infection does not completely eliminate the risk for infectious complications such as bacterial pneumonia and tuberculosis. The effect of HIV infection on lung-specific immune responses is being elucidated to help develop better prevention and treatment strategies in HIV-infected persons.

Introduction

Pulmonary disease has been a major co-morbidity in HIV-infected individuals since the beginning of the HIV epidemic[1]. Early in the epidemic, pulmonary infections such as bacterial pneumonia, tuberculosis, and Pneumocystis pneumonia were significant causes of morbidity and mortality[2]. Development of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has improved ability to control the HIV virus and led to improvements in longevity of persons infected with HIV. Lung diseases such as obstructive lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, and lung cancer are now emerging as significant comorbidities in the HIV-infected population. Additionally, lung infections are still a major problem in resource-limited settings. While epidemiologic evidence supports the role of HIV infection in the incidence of chronic lung disease, basic science models have highlighted mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. This review will discuss the current epidemiology of HIV-associated lung disease, explore the occurrence, risk factors, and pathogenesis of specific chronic lung diseases, and examine the role of infections and immunity in the lung in HIV-infected individuals.

Epidemiology

Over the course of the AIDS epidemic, the development of both pneumonia prophylaxis and ART have led to changes in the epidemiology of HIV-associated lung diseases. A large cohort study has recently investigated prevalence and incidence of a wide array of pulmonary diagnoses in HIV-infected compared to HIV-uninfected individuals. Investigators with the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) tracked the incidence of lung disease by ICD-9 diagnosis and self-report in 33,420 HIV-infected veterans and 66,840 HIV-uninfected veterans matched by age, sex, race and ethnicity, and site[3]. The most common diseases in the HIV-infected group were bacterial pneumonia (28.0 per 1000 person-years) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (20.3 per 1000 person-years). Incidence of COPD, lung cancer, pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis, bacterial pneumonia, Pneumocystis pneumonia, and tuberculosis were all greater in the HIV-infected group. Additionally, incidence rates of pulmonary diseases increased with age, and the difference in rates between HIV-infected and uninfected persons was greatest at younger ages suggesting an earlier onset of lung disease in HIV-infected persons.

Chronic obstructive lung disease/emphysema

Prior to the introduction of ART, studies reported that HIV was associated with COPD and emphysema[4]. Current epidemiologic studies indicate that HIV continues to be an independent risk factor for COPD, and there has been a three-fold increase in obstructive lung disease deaths in HIV[5,6]. Several cohort studies have recently investigated pulmonary function in HIV-infected populations in order to quantify the extent and types of abnormalities seen and to identify factors that may contribute to these pulmonary function abnormalities (Table 1)[7–11]. Airflow obstruction measured by spirometry seems to be more prevalent than expected in HIV-infected populations. For example, a cross-sectional analysis of spirometry from 234 HIV-infected individuals found 8.6% had a force expiratory volume (FEV₁)/forced vital capacity (FVC) lower than the 5% lower limit of age, race, and gender predicted normal [8]. In this group, lower FEV₁/FVC was associated with older age, smoking, history of bacterial pneumonia, and ART use. In a separate cohort of 167 HIV-infected outpatients, 21.0% had airflow obstruction (defined as FEV₁/FVC <0.7); and airflow obstruction was associated with smoking, intravenous drug use and ART [9]. Another cohort of 98 individuals had a 16.3% prevalence of obstructive lung disease (FEV₁/FVC <0.70 and an FEV₁ <80% predicted) which was associated with age, smoking, intravenous drug use, and history of Pneumocystis pneumonia [10]. In a cohort of intravenous drug abusers, obstructive lung disease (FEV₁/FVC <0.70) was present in 16.8% of HIV-infected participants[7]. HIV-infected participants with a viral load >200,000 copies/mL were about 3.4 times more likely to have obstructive lung disease than HIV-uninfected participants, but those with controlled viral loads were no more likely to have obstruction than the HIV-uninfected participants.

Table 1.

Recent studies of lung function in HIV-infected cohorts

Author, year	Design and population	Main findings	Other important findings
George et al., 2009 [8]	Cross-sectional analysis of spirometry data from 234 HIV-infected individuals recruited from an HIV clinic in Los Angeles, CA.	31% of participants had at least one respiratory symptom. Prevalence of an FEV1/FVC less than the age adjusted lower limit of normal was 8.6% and <0.7 was 6.8%.	Worse airflow obstruction was associated with older age, greater pack-years of smoking, history of bacterial pneumonia, use of ART.
Gingo et al., 2010 [9]	Cross-sectional analysis of pre-and post-bronchodilator spirometry and DLco data from 167 HIV- infected participants recruited from an HIV clinic at the University of Pittsburgh.	47% of participants had at least one respiratory symptom. 21% had irreversible airflow obstruction (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.7). High prevalence of diffusing impairment (64% had a DLco <80% predicted), including never smokers (47%).	Only 15% had pulmonary function testing in the past. Airflow obstruction was associated with increased pack- years smoking, intravenous drug use, and use of antiretroviral medication.
Cui et al., 2010 [21]	Cross-sectional analysis of spirometry from 119 HIV-infected participants from an HIV-clinic.	20% had abnormal spirometry. 53% had at least one respiratory symptom.	FEV1 worse with greater pack-years smoking, non-white race, male sex, and restrictive lung disease. Symptoms more common with current smoking and antiretroviral use.
Hirani et al. 2011 [10]	Cross-sectional analysis of spirometry and St. George Respiratory Questionnaire data from 98 consecutive HIV-infected patients seen for routine care at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia, PA.	16% had obstructive spirometry (FEV1/FVC<0.7). SGRQ mean was 7, 17 in smokers, and 27.7 in those with airflow obstruction.	Airflow obstruction associated with greater age, smoking, and history of PCP.
Drummond et al., 2012 [7]	Spirometry obtained at a defined time point in a subset of 1077 participants from the AIDS Linked to Intravenous Experience study cohort in Baltimore, MD.	16.8% of HIV-infected participants had airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC<0.7). Higher viral loads were associated with airflow obstruction.	No association between HIV status or CD4 counts and airflow obstruction.
Kristoffersen et al., 2012 [11]	Prospective cohort of 88 HIV-infected participants with repeat spirometry in 63 participants with a mean follow-up of 4.4 years. Denmark.	10% prevalence of airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC <0.7) at baseline that increased to 19% at follow-up 4.4 years later.	Reduced DLco was common at baseline (40%) and remained constant over 4.4 years.

Abbreviations: ART, antiretroviral therapy; DLco, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide; FEV₁/FVC, forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity; PCP, Pneumocystis pneumonia; SGRQ, St. George Respiratory Questionnaire

Emphysema is a phenotype of obstructive lung disease characterized by anatomic destruction of lung parenchyma that has long been seen in HIV infection. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DL_CO) is a marker of emphysema as well as other pulmonary disorders and was noted to be abnormal prior to the introduction of ART. Diffusion impairment appears to remain a common abnormality in the current HIV era. In one recent study, 64% of HIV-infected individuals had a DL_CO <80% predicted [9], and in another, 43% had a DL_CO <1.645 residual standard deviations below predicted values [11]. While diffusing impairment was worse in smokers, the prevalence of impaired diffusion capacity in never smokers was 48% and 9% in the two studies, respectively. A reduced diffusing capacity was associated with smoking and use of pneumonia prophylaxis,[9] and in longitudinal follow-up, DL_CO declined significantly and to a greater degree than other lung function parameters [11]. Additionally, a comparison of lung function between 229 HIV-infected and 213 HIV-uninfected participants from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort and VACS studies found that HIV infection was independently associated with impaired diffusing capacity[12].

The decrease in DLco likely has significant clinical relevance. In our experience, lower DL_CO is a significant predictor of mortality (Morris, unpublished data). In a cohort of 237 HIV-infected participants followed for 3 years on average, individuals who died had a significantly lower DLco (51.3% predicted versus 66.0% predicted, p=0.004) (Figure 1). The odds of death if the DLco was below 60% predicted were significantly greater independent of age, smoking history, ART use, and CD4 cell count (adjusted odds ratio=6.31, 95% confidence interval=1.21–32.9, p=0.029)(Morris, unpublished data). These findings suggest that lung diseases in HIV-infected individuals are an important health concern and either directly contribute to mortality or are a marker of an underlying systemic process.

Figure 1.

Mean diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DL_CO) % predicted in HIV-infected participants by vitality status after 3 years follow-up from the time of DL_CO measurement.

Cigarette smoke is clearly the leading risk factor for COPD/emphysema in HIV, but there are likely additional causes of COPD in HIV as the disease appears to be accelerated in HIV-infected smokers and is seen even in non-smokers. Poorly controlled HIV has been associated with worse pulmonary function[3,7]. In the VACS study, lung diseases such as asthma and COPD were less likely in those with lower HIV RNA levels and use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) at baseline. A study that directly measured pulmonary function also found that individuals with HIV viral levels above 200,000 copies/ml had worse airway obstruction[7]. These studies suggest either a direct viral effect or effects of HIV sequelae such as infections in development of COPD. Although more severe immunosuppression has been associated with COPD, two studies have found that use of ART is also associated with worse lung function[8,9]. These apparently contradictory findings could be explained potentially by differences in timing of ART initiation between populations, with those experiencing worse lung function on ART when it is initiated at a lower CD4 cell count, potentially from increases in autoimmunity or renewed immunologic response to low-level lung pathogens[13, 14].

The relationship of colonizing microbial pathogens to COPD in HIV has been recently investigated, and several studies have implicated colonization with Pneumocystis jirovecii, a common HIV-associated infection, in the pathogenesis of obstructive lung disease in HIV. In a cohort of 42 HIV-infected individuals, those with Pneumocystis jirovecii detectable only by nested PCR of the mitochondrial large subunit rRNA in oral washes or induced sputum had worse airflow and more obstructive lung disease by pulmonary function studies [15]. In macaque models of HIV infection, monkeys that become colonized with Pneumocystis (detection of Pneumocystis DNA in lung or airway samples) develop worse airflow obstruction and emphysema[16,17]. A non-immunosuppressed rodent model has also shown development of COPD-like changes in mice exposed to both cigarette smoke and Pneumocystis[18]. HIV infection is associated with a greater probability of colonization with Pneumocystis which may explain in part the increased prevalence of obstructive lung disease in HIV-infected persons [19]. Other factors associated with HIV infection including increased oxidative stress, cellular senescence, the lung microbiome community, and immune activation could also play a role in HIV-associated COPD.

Asthma

Asthma is characterized by airway inflammation and inducible or reversible airway obstruction (airway hyperreactivity) and can lead to significant morbidity such as episodes of dyspnea and functional impairment. Prior to ART, asthma and airway hyperreactivity were common in HIV infection and related to smoking and possibly to atopy [20,21]. In the ART era, findings regarding the prevalence of asthma are uncertain. In the VACS cohort which was predominantly older male smokers, asthma diagnosis was not any more common in HIV-infected individuals [3]. However, two recent studies have found 11% and 21% of HIV-infected persons had an asthma diagnosis by history (doctor-diagnosed asthma),[22,23] with a prevalence of approximately 9% in the general population[24,25]. Pulmonary function testing in these studies found 4% and 9% had bronchodilator reversibility by American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria, again what may be higher than expected in the general population[25]. In the later study, doctor-diagnosed asthma was associated with female sex, being obese, not being on ART, and a history of bacterial or Pneumocystis pneumonia, and there was a strong association between doctor-diagnosed asthma and high sputum eosinophil counts. In addition, approximately 10% of the cohort had high sputum eosinophil counts, suggesting an increase in Th2 type inflammation in the airways of HIV-infected persons, and there were associations between asthma diagnosis or bronchodilator response and sputum and serum cytokines that are also related to chronic HIV infection: RANTES and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α and -1β[26]. Interestingly, 55% of the HIV-infected individuals reported onset of asthma as an adult, often after diagnosis of HIV. In contrast, the majority of asthma diagnoses in the general population occur in children. These studies suggest that asthma is an important manifestation of lung disease in HIV-infected individuals and there may be a distinct phenotype associated with HIV. Allergy/atopy, metabolic disease, and chronic inflammation possibly stimulated by underlying infections could be important mechanisms causing airway inflammation in HIV.

Lung Cancer

The influence of HIV infection on lung cancer risk has been debated since early in the HIV epidemic. Taken as a whole, the recent literature would suggest HIV is currently an independent risk for lung cancer. In 2009, a meta-analysis examined studies using cancer registries or Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data to compare cancer rates in HIV populations to the general population [27]. HIV infection was associated with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 2.6 (95% CI, 2.1–3.1). While this study provided a powerful assessment of the risk HIV may contribute to lung cancer, it also highlights the limitations that many studies assessing lung cancer risk have: lack of prospectively collected data, inadequate comparison group, and limited ability to control for other lung cancer risk factors such as smoking or other behaviors.

Retrospective analyses of large administrative and clinical data have attempted to address some of these issues. A cohort of 5,053 HIV-infected persons in the Danish HIV Cohort Study were matched by age and sex to 50,530 HIV-uninfected persons [28]. The adjusted IRR was 2.38 (95% CI, 1.61–3.53). Parents of HIV-infected individuals had an elevated risk of lung cancer compared to the Danish population, suggesting there may have been genetic susceptibility or even greater exposure to risk factors (such as childhood second-hand smoke exposure) in the HIV-infected cohort. Another study linked VACS Virtual Cohort data with the Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry and found HIV infection was associated with a 1.7-fold (95% CI, 1.5–1.9) greater risk of lung cancer when controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking prevalence, prior bacterial pneumonia, and history of COPD [29]. Two studies of the California Kaiser Permanente integrated health delivery system assessed lung cancer risk in over 20,000 HIV-infected versus approximately 200,000 HIV-uninfected individuals. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) in HIV-infected versus HIV-uninfected was 1.9 (95% CI, 1.4–2.5) controlling for age, sex, calendar year, and race/ethnicity [30]. However, in a subsequent study they collected data on smoking, BMI, and alcohol/drug abuse, and when controlling for these factors, the IRR was 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9–1.6), suggesting that the difference in lung cancer rates between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons may be related to an excess of risk factors in the HIV-infected population [31].

Several prospective studies have also attempted to assess the independent risk of HIV in lung cancer. A study from the Women’s Interagency HIV Cohort following 2,651 HIV-infected and 898 HIV-uninfected women with similar HIV risk factors found the SIRs were significantly greater than SEER data for both groups, but there was no difference in lung cancer rates between the HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected groups [32]. A similar study of cancer incidence in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study of 6,972 men who have sex with men found the hazard ratio for lung cancer during the ART era in HIV+ to be 5.98 (95% CI, 0.47–320.86), but this ratio was not significant because of very few numbers of lung cancer cases (3 in HIV-infected versus 1 in HIV-uninfected) [33]. A recent study of lung cancer risk found in a cohort of 2,495 injection drug users in Baltimore, MD that HIV infection was associated with a 2.3 times (95% CI, 1.1–5.1) increase in the risk of lung cancer controlling for age, gender, and average packs smoked per day [34]. These prospective studies may not reveal as dramatic evidence of HIV as a risk for lung cancer as the larger retrospective cohort studies because they are able to more accurately control for confounding of other potential lung cancer risk factors such as smoking. However, there are still strong trends and some studies show statistical significance despite having few numbers, suggesting HIV to be a true risk factor for lung cancer.

Factors responsible for the potential increase in lung cancer related to HIV infection are not clear. Nearly all studies of lung cancer in HIV show that smoking is a strong risk factor for lung cancer in HIV-infected individuals, but do not find a significant interaction between the two. Immune function and immune surveillance are important mechanisms controlling tumorigenesis,[35] and it is suspected that immune deficiency related to HIV infection may be an important risk factor for lung cancer in HIV. Several studies show that risk of lung cancer in HIV-infected individuals increases with lower CD4 count[28,31] or higher plasma HIV RNA level[31] and is increased in those with a history of AIDS [27,36]. However, not all studies find these associations [3,29,37,38]. There also does not appear to be an association between ART use and lung cancer in HIV-infected persons[3,29]. Absolute numbers of lung cancers in HIV-infected persons are increasing as the population gets bigger, and there is less competing risk from AIDS-related conditions with more effective treatment[39]. However, the SIR compared to the HIV-uninfected population seems to be declining over time [30,40]. This decrease could be due to better HIV control and immune restoration with more effective treatments or to changes in risk behaviors.

While survival in lung cancer is poor in general, HIV infection may portend an even worse prognosis. Some studies have found that survival is worse in those with HIV infection, although some reports have found similar survival to the HIV-uninfected population [28,34,37,41]. Study results of mortality may be confounded by the increased likelihood of other causes of death in HIV-infected persons [41]. HIV-infected individuals are at greater risk for serious hematotoxicity with chemotherapeutic agents likely related to interactions with ART [42]. Survival in HIV-infected individuals with lung cancer is related to better performance status at diagnosis, higher CD4 count, early stage at diagnosis, and use of ART [42–44].

Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension was recognized early in the AIDS epidemic as having an increased prevalence in HIV-infected individuals[45]. In the current era, the VACS study found the overall baseline prevalence for pulmonary hypertension was low (0.2% in HIV-infected and 0.16% in HIV-uninfected individuals), but HIV-infected veterans were around 1.5 times more likely to be diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension during study follow-up[3]. While the diagnosis of primary pulmonary hypertension is rare, other more common processes such as primary lung or cardiac disease, inflammatory disease, or veno-embolic disease can lead to pulmonary vascular disease and elevated pulmonary artery pressures. Two recent studies show echocardiographic findings of pulmonary hypertension are common among HIV-infected persons [46,47]. In 656 HIV-infected individuals, 57% had an abnormal estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure of >30mmHg and 7% had pressures >40mmHg, although this prevalence may be slightly overestimated because of methodological issues related to the estimate of pulmonary artery pressures[46,48]. However, a study in another cohort using methods addressing those possible limitations found 66% of participants had pressures ≥30mmHg, and 16% had pressures ≥40mmHg[47]. In the later study, elevated pulmonary artery pressures were associated with worse respiratory symptoms, poorer lung function, more advanced HIV disease, and markers of inflammation and T-cell activation.

The increased risk for pulmonary hypertension and the relationship between pulmonary hypertension and increased morbidity in HIV-infected individuals make understanding pulmonary hypertension in this population an important area of inquiry. The HIV virus may have direct pathologic effect on pulmonary vasculature by causing endothelial dysfunction. HIV Nef protein has been implicated in this process by several studies [49–52]. HIV Nef reduces endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and induces oxidative stress in human pulmonary artery endothelial cells [50]. In a macaque model of HIV infection with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)/HIV hybrid virus (SHIV) with HIV Nef protein, Nef leads to Golgi dysfunction in endothelial cells, and Golgi dysfunction is also seen in human endothelial cells from HIV-infected individuals [51]. Additionally, HIV Nef gene polymorphisms have been associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension in HIV-infected individuals suggesting a functional role for HIV Nef [49]. However, there may be other mechanisms unrelated to HIV Nef since macaques infected with SHIV-env virus (which does not contain HIV Nef protein) also develop vascular changes associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension [53]. In addition to HIV proteins, there may be an interaction between HIV infection and use of illicit drugs. Cocaine and morphine have each been implicated in enhancing the effect of HIV-mediated pulmonary endothelial and smooth muscle dysfunction,[54,55] which is important given the high prevalence of injection drug use in the HIV population.

Survival with HIV-associated pulmonary hypertension may be improving with better HIV treatment and use of pulmonary hypertension medications. Although some studies have found increased risk with certain ART medications, other studies find that ART improves pulmonary hypertension[56,57]. Agents that target pulmonary hypertension in the HIV-uninfected population may also work in those with HIV. In a cohort of 77 HIV-infected participants, 50 were started on specific pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy (intravenous epoprostenol in three patients, inhaled iloprost in one, and bosentan in 45 patients, and a calcium channel blocker was initiated in one who responded acutely to nitric oxide) and had improvement in their six-minute walk distances and hemodynamic parameters [58]. With a mean follow-up of 42 months, overall survival was 88, 72, and 63% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, which is better than previously observed in HIV-associated pulmonary hypertension series, but worse than expected survival after first AIDS-defining illness [58]. Additionally, poor HIV control (low CD4 count, detectable HIV RNA) and factors related to worse pulmonary hypertension (history of right heart failure, New York Heart Association functional class IV, or worse cardiac index) were associated with worse survival. These data highlight the impact on survival and the importance of appropriate evaluation and treatment of pulmonary hypertension in HIV-infected patients.

Pneumonia

Tuberculosis, bacterial, and Pneumocystis pneumonia continue to cause a significant burden of morbidity in HIV-infected persons. The VACS investigators found all three of these pneumonias were drastically more common in HIV-infected veterans[3]. In a cohort of 736 children, incidence of community-acquired pneumonia has decreased from the period of 2000–2005, but it was found that poor HIV control was associated with increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia (a CD4%<15% or HIV viral load >100,000copies/mL)[59]. In a region with universal access to HIV care and pneumococcal vaccination, the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease (pneumococcal pneumonia or bacteremia, mainly) was 342/100,000 person-years [60]. Incidence was lower in those vaccinated with 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine, but high HIV RNA levels at the time of vaccination was associated with vaccine failure, suggesting that better HIV control was important in developing protective immunity with pneumococcal vaccine. In a series of 147 HIV-infected patients admitted with acute respiratory failure to a university hospital ICU in Paris, France between 1996 and 2006, the cause of acute respiratory failure was bacterial pneumonia in 50.3% and Pneumocystis pneumonia in 35.4% [61]. Hospital mortality was 24.3% and 15.3%, respectively, and was mainly influenced by number and severity of organ failures at admission and during ICU, but not by extent of immunodeficiency. However, compared to studies from the pre-ART era, hospital mortality from acute respiratory failure has improved [61]. While HAART therapy has drastically reduced the incidence of tuberculosis,[62,63] HIV and tuberculosis co-infections are on the rise[64]. HIV-infected individuals account for a large proportion of the world-wide tuberculosis burden (approximately 13% of tuberculosis cases occur in HIV-infected individuals) and an even greater proportion of tuberculosis-related deaths (approximately 24%)[64]. Part of this may be due to an increased risk for primary drug-resistant tuberculosis with HIV infection[65]. However, immune suppression and tuberculosis infection are clearly associated with worse outcomes[66]. Several recent studies have addressed timing of starting antiretroviral in HIV-infected patients with active tuberculosis to help improve immune function to combat active tuberculosis infection [67–69]. These studies randomized 1,899 participants early (within 2–4 weeks of starting tuberculosis treatment) vs. late (8–12 weeks after starting tuberculosis treatment) initiation of antiretroviral treatment. While there was an increase in immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome with early treatment, two studies showed no difference in AIDS-related death,[67,69] and the third showed a decrease in overall mortality[68]. For participants with CD4 counts <50cells/μL, early initiation of antiretroviral therapy was associated with a decrease in mortality[68,69]. Despite the effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy, pulmonary infections continue to be a significant source of morbidity and mortality in HIV infection, especially with the threat of drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Pulmonary immune response in HIV

A small number of studies recently have detailed some aspects of the immune responses in the lung of HIV-infected patients. These findings may explain in part the continued increase risk for pulmonary infections [70–74]. In a study that explored blood and alveolar lymphocytes in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons with Pneumocystis pneumonia, lower alveolar CD4+ T-cells was predictive of Pneumocystis pneumonia, and alveolar CD4+ T-cell numbers were strongly correlated with peripheral CD4+ T-cell counts in HIV-infected, but not HIV-uninfected subjects, illustrating the relationship between lung immune function and systemic immune function in HIV[71]. In addition, alveolar CD4+ T-cell function is impaired in HIV-infected compared to HIV-uninfected persons with HIV-infected individuals having a lower frequency of antigen specific CD4+ T-cells against influenza, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis and impaired influenza and Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific CD4+ T-cells responses[72]. HIV also decreases alveolar macrophage response to bacteria through Toll-like receptor 4 signaling through a myeloid differentiation factor 88 dependent pathway[74]. These studies illustrate mechanisms related to increased infections even in well controlled HIV-infected persons and suggest possible targets for future therapies.

Conclusion

While antiretroviral therapy has improved control of HIV infection, lung disease is still a significant problem in HIV. Obstructive lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, and lung cancer more commonly plague the HIV-infected population, and lung infections continue to occur. Basic science and translational research are starting to identify some mechanisms of disease pathogenesis that may provide future targets for prevention and treatment of HIV-related lung disease including the role of colonizing infections, and defects in pulmonary immunity. Continuing studies of pulmonary disease in HIV are important as the epidemic continues to evolve.