Abstract
Various agriculture management practices may have distinct influences on soil microbial communities and their ecological functions. In this study, we utilized GeoChip, a high-throughput microarray-based technique containing approximately 28,000 probes for genes involved in nitrogen (N)/carbon (C)/sulfur (S)/phosphorus (P) cycles and other processes, to evaluate the potential functions of soil microbial communities under conventional (CT), low-input (LI), and organic (ORG) management systems at an agricultural research site in Michigan. Compared to CT, a high diversity of functional genes was observed in LI. The functional gene diversity in ORG did not differ significantly from that of either CT or LI. Abundances of genes encoding enzymes involved in C/N/P/S cycles were generally lower in CT than in LI or ORG, with the exceptions of genes in pathways for lignin degradation, methane generation/oxidation, and assimilatory N reduction, which all remained unchanged. Canonical correlation analysis showed that selected soil (bulk density, pH, cation exchange capacity, total C, C/N ratio, NO3−, NH4+, available phosphorus content, and available potassium content) and crop (seed and whole biomass) variables could explain 69.5% of the variation of soil microbial community composition. Also, significant correlations were observed between NO3− concentration and denitrification genes, NH4+ concentration and ammonification genes, and N2O flux and denitrification genes, indicating a close linkage between soil N availability or process and associated functional genes.
INTRODUCTION
Soil microbial communities are responsible for performing many critical ecosystem functions and can be important biotic indicators of soil health (1, 2). Any detrimental effects of agricultural management systems on soil microbial communities would damage the functions that they perform and hence impact the ecological services provided by soils, such as nutrient cycling and crop protection (3). Thus, it is important to gain a better mechanistic understanding of the functional diversity, composition, and dynamics of soil microbial communities under various management systems. This would help to identify the ecological consequences of various agricultural practices and the development of beneficial management strategies.
The impacts of agricultural management systems on whole soil microbial community structure have been studied intensively via phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis (4–13), fingerprinting-based techniques such as community-level physiological profiles (13, 14), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (10, 15), and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) (16–18). 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes (19), 16S rRNA gene clone libraries (8, 18), and 454 pyrosequencing (20, 21) have also been utilized to analyze microbial communities at the phylogenetic and taxonomic levels. However, information on ecological functions of the soil microbial community under various agricultural systems is generally lacking in most studies. Although specific functional groups of microbes, such as denitrifiers (22), nitrifiers (23), and methanotrophs (20); specific functional genes, such as nirS, nosZ, and nifH (24); and specific extracellular enzyme activities, such as nitrous oxide reductase (22), have been analyzed previously, they provide only small pieces of information on ecological functions of soil microbial communities. A more comprehensive and simultaneous evaluation of microbial communities is needed. The development of GeoChip, a high-throughput microarray-based technique that contains approximately 28,000 probes covering more than 57,000 gene variants from 292 functional gene families, allows us to investigate the ecological functions of soil microbial communities involved in nitrogen (N), carbon (C), sulfur (S), and phosphorus (P) cycles and other processes (25) comprehensively in various ecosystems, including agricultural lands (26).
In this study, we collected soil samples from three agricultural systems under conventional (CT), low-input (LI), and organic (ORG) management systems, all following a corn (Zea mays L.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rotation at the W. K. Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) site in southwestern Michigan. The soil microbial communities were analyzed with GeoChip 3.0 technology (25) to evaluate changes of functional genes involved in important soil processes based on their diversity, composition, and abundances under various agricultural systems. The relationships between functional genes of soil microbial communities and environmental variables, including greenhouse gas fluxes, were evaluated as well. We hypothesized that the diversity, composition, and functional gene abundances of soil microbial communities were dramatically affected by agricultural systems. Moreover, we hypothesized that the functional genes of soil microbial communities and environmental variables were significantly correlated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study site.
This study was conducted at the KBS LTER site in Hickory Corners, MI (42° 24′ N, 85° 24′ W, 288 m above sea level), established in 1989. Soils at the KBS LTER site are well-drained Typic Hapludalfs developed on glacial outwash (27). The mean annual precipitation is 920 mm, and the mean annual temperature is 9.7°C (28).
Management systems.
We studied plots at the KBS LTER site managed (i) conventionally with standard chemical inputs (CT), (ii) with low inputs (LI), and (iii) organically with no chemical inputs (ORG). Treatment plots were arranged in a randomized-block design with six replicate blocks, and within each block, all 1-ha plots were separated by 10-m-wide grass strips. The CT treatment has been managed as a corn-soybean-wheat rotation since 1993 and was managed as a corn-soybean rotation from 1989 to 1992. The LI and ORG treatments have been managed as corn-soybean-wheat rotation since 1988, with a red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) winter cover crop to supply biologically fixed N, prior to the corn and soybean phases of the rotation (29).
Synthetic N fertilizer applied in the form of NH4NO3 before 1995 and as 28% UAN (solution of urea and ammonium nitrate) thereafter was applied to the CT and LI treatments during corn and wheat years. In the CT treatment, corn received 123 kg N ha−1, and wheat received 56 kg N ha−1. The LI treatment received one-third of the fertilizer applied for the CT treatment. Lime, N, P, and K were applied as needed, according to Michigan State University (MSU) recommendations (30). The ORG system received no N fertilizer, and no compost or manure was applied to any of the treatments.
All crop varieties were herbicide susceptible. In the CT treatment, herbicides were applied at the rate recommended for the region (31). In the ORG treatment, weed management consisted of multiple passes with a cultivator and rotary hoe. For the LI treatment, the weed management was similar to that for ORG, although it also received postemergence herbicide applications banded within rows. No insecticides were applied for any of the treatments. Additional information on the agronomic practices can be found at the KBS LTER website (http://lter.kbs.msu.edu/Data/DataCatalog.html).
Field sampling and environmental variable measurements.
Bulk soil samples were collected with bucket augers on 3 September 2008 when corn was planted in all three systems. Six soil cores (3.8 by 10 cm) collected across the row to achieve a sample unbiased by plant proximity were pooled for each replicate plot. Composited soil samples were sieved through a 4-mm sieve in the field and then stored overnight at 4°C. Subsamples were taken on the next day and frozen at −80°C until shipment to the University of Oklahoma for soil microbial community analysis. Other environmental variables were measured routinely at the KBS LTER site and are available online (http://lter.kbs.msu.edu/datatables), including yield, greenhouse gas fluxes, and so on.
Microbial community DNA isolation and purification.
At the University of Oklahoma, soil DNA was extracted by freeze-grinding mechanical lysis, as described previously (32). The DNA was purified using a low-melting agarose gel followed by phenol extraction. DNA quality was assessed based on the ratios of absorbance at 260/280 nm and 260/230 nm by using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE), while final soil DNA concentrations were quantified by PicoGreen (33), using a FLUOstar Optima instrument (BMG Labtech, Jena, Germany).
GeoChip analysis.
GeoChip 3.0 was used in this study, as described previously (34), with the following steps.
(i) Template labeling.
For template labeling, 3 μg extracted DNA was labeled with the fluorescent dye Cy5 by random priming. First, DNA was mixed with 20 μl random primers, denatured at 99.9°C for 5 min, and then immediately chilled on ice. Labeling master mix containing 2.5 μl deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) (5 mM dATP/dGTP/dCTP, 2.5 mM dTTP), 1 μl Cy5 dUTP (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ), 80 U of the large Klenow fragment (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and 2.5 μl water was added to denatured DNA and incubated at 37°C for 3 h, followed by heating at 95°C for 3 min to stop labeling. The labeled DNA was purified by use of the QIAquick purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) based on the manufacturer's instructions, measured by using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE) to check the label efficiency, and dried in a SpeedVac (ThermoSavant, Milford, MA) at 45°C for 45 min.
(ii) Hybridization and imaging processing.
For hybridization and imaging processing, the labeled DNA was resuspended in 50 μl hybridization solution (40% formamide, 5× SSC [1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate], 5 μg of unlabeled herring sperm DNA [Promega, Madison, WI], and 0.1% SDS) and 2 μl universal standard DNA (0.2 pmol μl−1) labeled with the fluorescent dye Cy3 (35), denatured at 95°C for 5 min, and maintained at 50°C until loaded onto microarray slides. Arrays were hybridized on a MAUI Hybridization Station (Roche, South San Francisco, CA) for 12 h at 42°C. After washing and drying, the microarrays were scanned by using a ScanArray Express microarray scanner (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA) at 633 nm using a laser power of 90% and a photomultiplier tube (PMT) gain of 75%. The obtained images were analyzed by using ImaGene, version 6.0 (Biodiscovery, El Segundo, CA), to determine the intensity of each spot and identify poor-quality spots.
(iii) Data preprocessing.
For data preprocessing, raw data from ImaGene were submitted to the laboratory's Microarray Data Manager System (http://ieg.ou.edu/microarray/) and analyzed by the following major steps. (i) The spots flagged as 1 or 3 by ImaGene and with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of less than 2.0 (36) were removed as poor-quality spots. (ii) After the poor-quality spots were removed, a two-step normalization method was used. First, the mean Cy3 intensity of the universal standards in each subgrid was used to normalize the Cy5 intensity for samples in the same subgrid. Second, the Cy5 intensity after the first normalization was normalized by the mean Cy3 intensity of universal standards in all slides. (iii) The probes that appeared in only one of six replicates in each treatment were removed as noise. Afterwards, the relative abundance in each sample was calculated by dividing the individual signal intensity of each probe by the sum of the original signal intensity for all detected probes in that sample. The relative abundance was then multiplied by the mean value for the sums of the original signal intensity in all samples. A natural logarithm transformation was performed for the amplified relative abundance plus 1.
Statistical analysis.
To calculate the gene overlap at the treatment level, the detected genes in six replicates of each treatment were composited as one pool. The gene overlap between treatments was calculated by the number of genes detected in both treatments. The proportion of overlapped genes was calculated by dividing the number of overlapped genes between treatments by the number of all genes detected in both treatments. The proportion of unique genes in each treatment was calculated by dividing the number of genes that were not detected in any other treatments by the number of all genes detected in this treatment.
Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA), three nonparametric tests (multiple-response permutation procedure [MRPP], permutational multivariate analysis of variance [Adonis], and analysis of similarity [ANOSIM]), canonical correlation analysis (CCA), Mantel test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed by using R, version 2.9.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Differences between treatments were compared by post hoc Fisher's least-significant-difference (LSD) test with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment, which is more powerful and less conservative than the Bonferroni procedure (37). The significant differences were defined as a P value of <0.05, or with listed P values.
RESULTS
Yield, greenhouse gas emission, and other environmental variables.
Various management systems had significant effects on crop yield in 2008 (P = 0.01). The yields (mean ± standard error) were 5,276.7 (±504.2) kg ha−1 in CT, 5,079.7 (±144.4) kg ha−1 in LI, and 3,717.5 (±291.8) kg ha−1 in ORG. Based on LSD tests, the yield in ORG was significantly lower than those in both CT and LI treatments by 29.5 and 26.8%, respectively. However, there was no significant difference in yield between CT and LI.
The field gas fluxes of CO2, CH4, and N2O were measured in 2008 during the growing season at eight time points: 8 April, 23 April, 20 May, 3 June, 8 July, 23 July, 20 August, and 16 September. The CO2 flux included both heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration. The measured values for CH4 flux at most time points were negative, reflecting that the process of CH4 oxidation overwhelmed CH4 production. By repeated-measure ANOVA, management systems had significant effects only on CO2 flux (P = 0.003) but not on the flux of CH4 or N2O. At single time points, CT treatment consistently had a lower CO2 flux than LI or ORG except on 20 August and 16 September (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). The CO2 flux in LI and ORG treatments did not differ significantly at any single time point. There was no significant effect of management systems on CH4 flux for all single time points (see Fig. S1B in the supplemental material). For N2O flux, the only significant difference was observed on 23 July (P = 0.02), when N2O flux in CT was significantly higher than that in LI but not that in ORG (see Fig. S1C in the supplemental material).
The soil total C and C/N ratio measured in 2001 were significantly affected by management systems (P < 0.05), which were both significantly lower in CT than in LI and ORG treatments (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The effects of management systems on soil nitrate content were significant as well (P = 0.01), but not on ammonium content, all measured in 2007 (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The soil nitrate content was significantly higher in CT than in LI and ORG, while there was no significant difference between LI and ORG.
Functional diversity of soil microbial communities.
Based on the detected functional genes, community diversity was assessed by richness (detected number of probes in each sample), Shannon-Weaver (H), and Simpson reciprocal (1/D) indexes (Table 1). Results showed that richness was significantly lower in CT than in LI, while there was no significant difference between LI and ORG or CT and ORG, based on LSD tests. Similarly, CT had a significantly lower Simpson reciprocal index value than did LI, representing a significantly lower diversity in CT, while the difference was not significant between LI and ORG or CT and ORG. No significant difference was observed for Shannon-Weaver index values.
Table 1.
Gene overlap, uniqueness, and diversity indicesa
| Parameter | Value for treatmentd |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| CT | LI | ORG | |
| No. (%) of genes | |||
| CT | 310 (13.6) | 1,832 (53.3) | 1,788 (51.1) |
| LI | 514 (17.16) | 2,303 (62.2) | |
| ORG | 576 (19.1) | ||
| No. of genes in treatments | 2,276 | 2,995 | 3,013 |
| Mean richness (no. of probes) ± SE | 1,300 ± 173 (b) | 1,806 ± 220 (a) | 1,728 ± 217 (ab) |
| Mean Hb ± SE | 7.11 ± 0.16 (a) | 7.45 ± 0.15 (a) | 7.41 ± 0.12 (a) |
| Mean invsimpson (1/D)c ± SE | 1,293.06 ± 171.58 (b) | 1,795.43 ± 218.21 (a) | 1,717.15 ± 214.30 (ab) |
Gene probes were regarded as “species,” and their abundances were represented by the normalized signal intensities.
Shannon-Weaver index is defined as H = −∑pi × ln(pi), where pi is the proportional abundance of species i.
Simpson's index is based on D = ∑pi2 and invsimpson returns (1/D).
Different letters in parentheses indicate statistical differences at a P value of <0.05 among treatments by least-significant-difference (LSD) tests. Italic type indicates gene overlap, and boldface type indicates uniqueness.
Gene overlap was calculated at the whole-treatment level (Table 1). The proportions of overlapped genes between treatments ranged from 51.1% between CT and ORG to 62.2% between ORG and LI. To understand the heterogeneity of microbial populations in these samples, the proportions of unique genes detected in each treatment were calculated as well. The CT treatment had the lowest proportion of unique genes, at 13.6%, while ORG had the highest proportion, at 19.1%.
Functional compositions of soil microbial communities.
Three nonparametric tests (MRPP, Adonis, and ANOSIM) were performed by utilizing the Bray-Curtis index and consistently showed that the communities in CT were significantly different from those in LI or ORG (P < 0.02), while the communities in LI and ORG did not differ (Table 2). The DCA profile illustrated that CT was separated clearly from LI and ORG along DCA1, while LI and ORG were distinct along DCA2 (Fig. 1).
Table 2.
Nonparametric analyses to test dissimilarity of communities between any two treatments of CT, LI, and ORGe
| Treatment | Adonisa |
ANOSIMb |
MRPPc |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | Pd | R | Pd | δ | Pd | |
| CT vs LI | 0.189 | 0.01 | 0.328 | 0.01 | 0.401 | 0.02 |
| CT vs ORG | 0.180 | 0.01 | 0.320 | 0.01 | 0.415 | 0.01 |
| LI vs ORG | 0.125 | 0.18 | 0.085 | 0.18 | 0.399 | 0.13 |
Permutational multivariate analysis of variance using distance matrices. Significance tests were performed by F tests based on sequential sums of squares from permutations of the raw data.
ANOSIM, analysis of similarities. The statistic R is based on the difference of mean ranks between groups and within groups. The significance of observed R is assessed by permuting the grouping vector to obtain the empirical distribution of R under the null model.
MRPP, multiresponse permutation procedure. The statistic δ is the overall weighted mean of within-group means of the pairwise dissimilarities among sampling units. The significance test is the fraction of permuted deltas that are less than the observed delta.
P value of the corresponding significance test.
All three tests are multivariate analyses based on the Bray-Curtis index.
Fig 1.
Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) of GeoChip data showing that treatments of conventional (CT), low-input (LI), and no-input (ORG) systems had substantial influences on functional compositions of soil microbial communities.
Abundance of functional genes in carbon/nitrogen/phosphorus/sulfur cycles.
The geochemistry cycles of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and sulfur (S), important in sustaining ecosystem functions, including providing nutrients for crop growth, are of our particular interests. The functional genes involved in these processes were investigated, although more comprehensive functional genes involved in other functional catalogs, like metal resistance, were also included in GeoChip (25).
The abundances of the genes involved in active C degradation were significantly lower in CT than in LI (P < 0.05), including those encoding α-amylase (amyA) and pullulanase (amyX) for starch decomposition, arabinofuranosidase (ara for fungi) and xylanase (xylA) for hemicellulose decomposition, cellobiase for cellulose decomposition, endochitinase for chitin decomposition, and isocitrate lyase (aceA), malate synthase (aceB), limonene-1,2-epoxide hydrolase (limEH), and vanillin dehydrogenase (vdh) for decomposition of aromatic substances (Fig. 2). The amyX gene was not detected in CT, but it was detected in LI and ORG treatments. For the amyA, endochitinase, and aceB genes, abundances were significantly lower in CT than in ORG (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between CT and ORG for other genes involved in C degradation. The abundances of most C degradation genes in LI and ORG treatments did not differ significantly, except those of the ara (fungi), xylA, and cellobiase genes, which were significantly lower in ORG than in LI (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the abundances of genes involved in lignin degradation did not differ significantly among the three treatments.
Fig 2.
Normalized signal intensity of detected genes in carbon (C) degradation under conventional (CT), low-input (LI), and organic (ORG) management systems. The complexity of carbon is presented in order from labile to recalcitrant. Error bars represent standard errors. Different letters indicate statistical differences at a P value of <0.05 among treatments by least-significant-difference (LSD) tests. No letter was labeled if there was no treatment effect. CDH, cellobiose dehydrogenase.
The abundances of all genes involved in the function of C fixation (aclB, encoding ATP citrate lyase, and the CODH [carbon monoxide dehydrogenase], Pcc [propionyl-CoA carboxylase], and Rubisco [ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase] genes) were significantly lower in CT than in LI (P < 0.05) (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Among them, the aclB gene was not detected in CT but was detected in LI and ORG. The abundances of the Pcc and Rubisco genes were significantly lower in CT than in ORG as well (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between LI and ORG for the abundances of all genes involved in C fixation. For genes involved in methane oxidation and production, no significant treatment effects were observed.
For the N cycle processes, compared to LI or ORG, CT had significantly low abundances of gdh, encoding glutamate dehydrogenase; ureC, encoding urease subunit α for ammonification; hzo, encoding hydrazine oxidase for anammox; nirK, encoding copper-containing nitrite reductase; nirS, encoding a cytochrome cd1 nitrite reductase precursor for denitrification; nrfA, encoding c-type cytochrome nitrite reductase for dissimilatory N reduction; and nifH, encoding nitrogenase reductase for N fixation (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3). The abundance of narG, encoding the α subunit of nitrate reductase, was significantly lower in CT than in LI (P < 0.05) but did not differ from that in ORG. There were no significant differences between LI and ORG for all genes in the N cycle. The gene abundances in functional processes of assimilatory N reduction and nitrification were not affected by management treatments. For example, the abundances of amoA, encoding ammonia monooxygenase, did not differ significantly by treatments, no matter whether the genes were from bacteria (P = 0.77), archaea (P = 0.50), or both groups (P = 0.63).
Fig 3.
Normalized signal intensity of detected genes in nitrogen cycles under conventional (CT), low-input (LI), and organic (ORG) management systems. The processes involved in N cycles include ammonification (1), anammox (2), assimilatory N reduction (3), denitrification (4), dissimilatory N reduction (5), nitrification (6), and N fixation (7). Error bars represent standard errors. Different letters indicate statistical differences at a P value of <0.05 among treatments by LSD tests. No letter was labeled if there was no treatment effect.
Regarding phosphorus (P) and sulfur (S) cycles, the abundances of ppx, encoding exopolyphosphatase for P utilization; aprA, encoding adenylylsulfate reductase subunit α; dsrA, encoding sulfite reductase subunit α for sulfite reduction; and sox, for sulfur oxidation, were significantly lower in CT than in LI and ORG (P < 0.05) (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). Phytase genes for P utilization were detected only in LI and not in CT and ORG. There were no significant differences between LI and ORG treatments for all detected genes involved in P and S cycles.
Environmental variables shaping the whole microbial community.
To test which environmental variables shape soil microbial community structure, CCA was performed based on all detected functional genes and measured soil and crop properties (Fig. 4A), including bulk density (BD), total C content (TC), C/N ratio (C/N), nitrate (NO3−), ammonium (NH4+), pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), available phosphorus content (P), and available potassium content (K) for soil and seed biomass and whole biomass for crop (Fig. 4B). The CCA results revealed that the functional gene composition of microbial communities was significantly correlated with all selected variables in the adopted CCA model (P = 0.01) by a Monte Carlo test, with a sum of total eigenvalues of 1.359. The variance inflation factors (VIF) varied from 2.0 for soil nitrate content to 20.9 for TC. For each individual variable, significant correlation was found between microbial communities and soil TC (P = 0.01), C/N ratio (P = 0.01), NO3− (P = 0.040), P (P = 0.01), and whole-crop biomass (P = 0.01).
Fig 4.
Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of GeoChip data under conventional (CT), low-input (LI), and organic (ORG) management systems with selected environmental variables (A), model significances (B), and partial CCA-based variation partitioning analysis (VPA) (C). The selected environmental variables include bulk density (BD), total C content (TC), C/N ratio (C/N), nitrite (NO3−), ammonium (NH4+), pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), available phosphorus (P), and available potassium (K) for soil, and seed biomass and whole biomass for crop.
In the CCA profile (Fig. 4A), the first two canonical axes explained 18.6 and 15.5% of the constrained variations in microbial communities, respectively. The communities in CT separated clearly from those in LI and ORG along the first canonical axis (CCA1), while communities in LI and ORG separated along the second canonical axis (CCA2). The projection of environmental variables demonstrated that LI and ORG samples were positively correlated with several variables, including soil NH4+, CEC, C/N, and TC, while CT samples were negatively correlated with them. Other variables, including BD, pH, NO3−, P, K+, whole-crop biomass, and seed biomass, were negatively correlated with CT samples but positively correlated with LI and ORG samples. Indicated by the length of arrows in the CCA profile (Fig. 4A), the impacts of the variables TC, C/N ratio, NO3−, P, and crop whole biomass on microbial communities were greater than those of other variables.
Both soil and crop variables were significantly correlated with microbial communities at P values of 0.031 and 0.015, respectively. Variation partitioning analysis (VPA) was conducted to examine the contribution of each catalog in influencing the soil microbial communities in the CCA analysis (Fig. 4C). The soil variables explained 53.3% of the variation in microbial communities, and the crop variables explained 11.9%, while their interaction explained 4.3%, leaving 30.5% unexplained.
Linkage between greenhouse gas fluxes or N availability and functional genes.
To examine the linkage between the field flux of CH4 (mean of all measurements during the growing season in 2008 [http://lter.kbs.msu.edu/datatables/28]) and the detected functional genes in methane cycling, both a Mantel test and CCA were performed, but none of them showed a significant correlation (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). For field flux of N2O (mean of all measurements during the growing season in 2008 [http://lter.kbs.msu.edu/datatables/28]), it was significantly correlated with the whole genes for denitrification (P = 0.04) by CCA. Other than narG, encoding the α subunit of nitrate reductase, all other individual denitrification genes were significantly correlated with N2O flux by CCA at a P value 0.02 for norB or 0.05 < P < 0.10 for nirK, nirS, and nosZ. The only significant correlation captured by the Mantel test was between nosZ and N2O flux (P = 0.03) (see Table S2 in the supplemental material).
The linkage between soil N availability (NO3− and NH4+) and functional genes in N cycles was analyzed by a Mantel test and CCA as well (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). The Mantel test captured only a correlation between gdh, encoding glutamate dehydrogenase, in the ammonification process and soil NH4+ content at a P value of 0.08. The CCA was relatively more sensitive than the Mantel test by capturing more significant correlations between N availability and N functional genes. By CCA, a correlation between the whole genes for N cycling and soil NO3− content, but not NH4+, was observed at a P value of 0.09. The whole genes for ammonification, especially ureC, were significantly correlated with soil NH4+ content (P = 0.05) rather than NO3−, while the whole genes for denitrification, driven mainly by narG, were significantly correlated with soil NO3− content (P = 0.05) but not NH4+. Moreover, the nirA gene, involved in assimilatory N reduction, and the norB gene, involved in denitrification, had correlations with soil NH4+ content at P values of 0.01 and 0.08, respectively.
DISCUSSION
Based on the Simpson reciprocal index, the functional gene diversity of soil microbial communities in the CT treatment was significantly lower than that in the LI treatment. Many differences existed between the CT and LI management systems in this study. The LI treatment used winter cover crop (red clover) to provide supplemental N for plant growth, while the CT treatment did not. The fertilizer and herbicide applied in the LI treatment were one-third and two-thirds of those in the CT treatment, respectively. Moreover, the total C concentration in A/Ap horizon of the LI soil was 6.7% higher than that of the CT soil (38). All these differences may contribute to the distinction of functional gene diversity in soil microbial communities between the CT and LI treatments. For example, higher soil C storage in the LI treatment may provide a more benign dwelling for soil microbes, as it has beneficial effects on soil drainage, structure, water-holding capacity, and other important soil properties to promote plant growth (39) and supply more substrates. Moreover, high doses of N fertilizer in the CT treatment may have a suppressing effect on the soil microbial community. It has been reported that chemical N fertilizer decreased the soil microbial diversity at the genotype level measured by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis (40) or at the metabolism level by Biolog (41). The mechanisms for the suppressing effect of N fertilizer on the diversity of the soil microbial community in the CT treatment may be similar to that for plant communities (42–46), like intensified resource preemption and competitive exclusion (47–49).
Although the total C concentration in the A/Ap horizon of the ORG soil was 17.3% higher than that of the CT soil (38), and no chemicals were applied, the functional gene diversity of soil microbial communities in the ORG treatment did not differ significantly from that of the LI or CT treatment. In this study, none of the treatments applied compost or manure, which is commonly adopted in many other organic systems and has been reported to increase the soil microbial diversity (8, 13, 50, 51). Similar to the LI treatment, the ORG treatment also used winter cover crop to supply N. However, the relative deficiency of most easy-access substrates in the ORG treatment, which could be provided by mineral fertilizer, may limit the ability of soil microbes to utilize nutrients in cover crop, lead to C accumulation, and affect the functional gene diversity. Compared to the ORG treatment, the mineral fertilizer applied to the LI treatment, though limited, may have a priming effect (52, 53) on soil microbes by stimulating their activities in decomposing cover crop residues, releasing nutrients and causing higher-function gene diversity.
While the diversity metrics represent the variability among species (gene probes) in a community (54), the community structure or composition refers to the pattern of species distribution (the different kinds of species and their abundances) (55). The community composition of soil microbes based on functional genes detected by GeoChip (functional gene composition) in the CT treatment was significantly different from those in the LI or ORG treatment by both DCA and nonparametric tests, while the communities in the LI and ORG treatments did not differ from one another, as measured by nonparametric tests, but were readily distinguishable in the DCA profile. The impacts of different management systems on soil microbial community composition, but not functional gene composition as measured by GeoChip, were also observed previously in other studies (4, 5, 56, 57). At the same experiment site, KBS LTER, by using T-RFLP, the compositions of microbial communities in various soil fractions were previously reported to be significantly different among different agricultural systems with conventionally and organically managed corn and continuous alfalfa (16, 17). Buckley and Schmidt (19) also included conventionally and organically managed corn fields at the KBS LTER site in their study but found that the soil microbial community structures in these treatments were remarkably similar by utilizing 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes and 16S rRNA T-RFLP techniques, which is possibly explained by the low number of replicates (three) analyzed and high natural variability in the microbial communities, as mentioned by those authors. The other possible reasons for the conflicting results may include the use of different techniques (17) and temporal variability of the soil microbial community.
Temporal variability is important for the soil microbial community, over either a seasonal or a successional scale. The shifts of climate factors, such as temperature and precipitation, during seasons and over years are often the strongest factors influencing biological populations (58, 59). The interaction between treatments and time dynamics may also occur for soil microbial communities (58). However, in this study, samples were analyzed at only a single time point for soil microbial community, and its temporal variability was not investigated. Future studies are needed to test whether the treatment effects on functional gene diversity and composition of soil microbial community were consistent over both short and long time scales.
Well-established linkages between environmental variables or processes and functional genes of soil microbial communities were observed. The entire functional gene composition was significantly correlated with selected soil and crop variables. Significant correlations were also observed between soil NO3− content and denitrification genes and between soil NH4+ content and ammonification genes, implying a close relationship between soil N availability and associated functional genes. Although correlations between N2O fluxes and denitrification genes were significant, both unchanged N2O fluxes and lower abundances of some denitrification genes in CT were observed. In this study, we investigated only three annual crop treatments. By including more treatments, especially those for perennial, successional systems with native vegetation and forest, well-established linkages between greenhouse gas emissions and soil microbial communities were observed in previous studies at the same experimental site. For example, the gene abundances of nirS minus nosZ were assessed as a proxy for determining soil N2O emissions, and a strong correlation between them was reported (24) when all treatments at the KBS LTER site were included.
Conclusion.
Compared to the conventional farming system, low-input systems had a high functional gene diversity of soil microbial communities. However, the functional gene diversity did not differ between the LI and ORG systems. The abundances of genes involved in C/N/P/S cycles were consistently higher in the low-input or organic systems than in the conventional system. These results demonstrated that low-input systems may help in sustaining higher soil microbial community diversity and potentially enhance functions mediated by soil microbes in nutrient cycling. Moreover, the soil microbial community composition was significantly correlated with selected soil (bulk density, pH, cation exchange capacity, total C, C/N ratio, NO3−, NH4+, available phosphorus content, and available potassium content) and crop (seed and whole biomass) variables, which could explain 69.5% of the variation. Significant correlations between soil NO3− content and denitrification genes, soil NH4+ content and ammonification genes, and N2O flux and denitrification genes were also observed, implying a close linkage between soil N availability or process and associated functional genes.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the United States Department of Agriculture (project 2007-35319-18305) through the NSF-USDA Microbial Observatories Program, the National Science Foundation (MCB-0731913), the NSF Long-Term Ecological Research Program at the Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University AgBioResearch, and the Oklahoma Bioenergy Center (OBC). This study made use of the GeoChip and associated computational pipelines whose development was funded by ENIGMA (Ecosystems and Networks Integrated with Genes and Molecular Assemblies) through the Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, the U.S. Department of Energy, under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231.
We thank Shi-Fang Hsu for giving comments on this paper.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print 14 December 2012
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03393-12.
REFERENCES
- 1. Jackson LE, Calderon FJ, Steenwerth KL, Scow KM, Rolston DE. 2003. Responses of soil microbial processes and community structure to tillage events and implications for soil quality. Geoderma 114:305–317 [Google Scholar]
- 2. van Bruggen AHC, Semenov AM. 2000. In search of biological indicators for soil health and disease suppression. Appl. Soil Ecol. 15:13–24 [Google Scholar]
- 3. Pimentel D, Hepperly P, Hanson J, Douds D, Seidel R. 2005. Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. Bioscience 55:573–582 [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bossio DA, Scow KM, Gunapala N, Graham KJ. 1998. Determinants of soil microbial communities: effects of agricultural management, season, and soil type on phospholipid fatty acid profiles. Microb. Ecol. 36:1–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Buyer JS, Teasdale JR, Roberts DP, Zasada IA, Maul JE. 2010. Factors affecting soil microbial community structure in tomato cropping systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42:831–841 [Google Scholar]
- 6. Heinze S, Raupp J, Joergensen RG. 2010. Effects of fertilizer and spatial heterogeneity in soil pH on microbial biomass indices in a long-term field trial of organic agriculture. Plant Soil 328:203–215 [Google Scholar]
- 7. Islam MR, Trivedi P, Palaniappan P, Reddy MS, Sa T. 2009. Evaluating the effect of fertilizer application on soil microbial community structure in rice based cropping system using fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) analysis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25:1115–1117 [Google Scholar]
- 8. Jangid K, Williams MA, Franzluebbers AJ, Sanderlin JS, Reeves JH, Jenkins MB, Endale DM, Coleman DC, Whitman WB. 2008. Relative impacts of land-use, management intensity and fertilization upon soil microbial community structure in agricultural systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40:2843–2853 [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kong AYY, Scow KM, Cordova-Kreylos AL, Holmes WE, Six J. 2011. Microbial community composition and carbon cycling within soil microenvironments of conventional, low-input, and organic cropping systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43:20–30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Marschner P, Kandeler E, Marschner B. 2003. Structure and function of the soil microbial community in a long-term fertilizer experiment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35:453–461 [Google Scholar]
- 11. Patra AK, Le Roux X, Grayston SJ, Loiseau P, Louault F. 2008. Unraveling the effects of management regime and plant species on soil organic carbon and microbial phospholipid fatty acid profiles in grassland soils. Bioresour. Technol. 99:3545–3551 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Peacock AD, Mullen MD, Ringelberg DB, Tyler DD, Hedrick DB, Gale PM, White DC. 2001. Soil microbial community responses to dairy manure or ammonium nitrate applications. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33:1011–1019 [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zhong WH, Gu T, Wang W, Zhang B, Lin XG, Huang QR, Shen WS. 2010. The effects of mineral fertilizer and organic manure on soil microbial community and diversity. Plant Soil 326:511–522 [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zhang NL, Wan SQ, Li LH, Bi J, Zhao MM, Ma KP. 2008. Impacts of urea N addition on soil microbial community in a semi-arid temperate steppe in northern China. Plant Soil 311:19–28 [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chu HY, Lin XG, Fujii T, Morimoto S, Yagi K, Hu JL, Zhang JB. 2007. Soil microbial biomass, dehydrogenase activity, bacterial community structure in response to long-term fertilizer management. Soil Biol. Biochem. 39:2971–2976 [Google Scholar]
- 16. Blackwood CB, Dell CJ, Smucker AJM, Paul EA. 2006. Eubacterial communities in different soil macroaggregate environments and cropping systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38:720–728 [Google Scholar]
- 17. Blackwood CB, Paul EA. 2003. Eubacterial community structure and population size within the soil light fraction, rhizosphere, and heavy fraction of several agricultural systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35:1245–1255 [Google Scholar]
- 18. Sessitsch A, Weilharter A, Gerzabek MH, Kirchmann H, Kandeler E. 2001. Microbial population structures in soil particle size fractions of a long-term fertilizer field experiment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:4215–4224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Buckley DH, Schmidt TM. 2001. The structure of microbial communities in soil and the lasting impact of cultivation. Microb. Ecol. 42:11–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Levine UY, Teal TK, Robertson GP, Schmidt TM. 2011. Agriculture's impact on microbial diversity and associated fluxes of carbon dioxide and methane. ISME J. 5:1683–1691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ramirez KS, Lauber CL, Knight R, Bradford MA, Fierer N. 2010. Consistent effects of nitrogen fertilization on soil bacterial communities in contrasting systems. Ecology 91:3463–3470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Cavigelli MA, Robertson GP. 2001. Role of denitrifier diversity in rates of nitrous oxide consumption in a terrestrial ecosystem. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33:297–310 [Google Scholar]
- 23. Phillips CJ, Harris D, Dollhopf SL, Gross KL, Prosser JI, Paul EA. 2000. Effects of agronomic treatments on structure and function of ammonia-oxidizing communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:5410–5418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Morales SE, Cosart T, Holben WE. 2010. Bacterial gene abundances as indicators of greenhouse gas emission in soils. ISME J. 4:799–808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. He ZL, Deng Y, Van Nostrand JD, Tu QC, Xu MY, Hemme CL, Li XY, Wu LY, Gentry TJ, Yin YF, Liebich J, Hazen TC, Zhou JZ. 2010. GeoChip 3.0 as a high-throughput tool for analyzing microbial community composition, structure and functional activity. ISME J. 4:1167–1179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Reeve JR, Schadt CW, Carpenter-Boggs L, Kang S, Zhou JZ, Reganold JP. 2010. Effects of soil type and farm management on soil ecological functional genes and microbial activities. ISME J. 4:1099–1107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Robertson GP, Paul EA, Harwood RR. 2000. Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289:1922–1925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Gelfand I, Snapp SS, Robertson GP. 2010. Energy efficiency of conventional, organic, and alternative cropping systems for food and fuel at a site in the US Midwest. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44:4006–4011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Syswerda SP, Basso B, Hamilton SK, Tausig JB, Robertson GP. 2012. Long-term nitrate loss along an agricultural intensity gradient in the Upper Midwest USA. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 149:10–19 [Google Scholar]
- 30. Grandy AS, Loecke TD, Parr S, Robertson GP. 2006. Long-term trends in nitrous oxide emissions, soil nitrogen, and crop yields of till and no-till cropping systems. J. Environ. Qual. 35:1487–1495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Davis AS, Renner KA, Gross KL. 2005. Weed seedbank and community shifts in a long-term cropping systems experiment. Weed Sci. 53:296–306 [Google Scholar]
- 32. Zhou JZ, Bruns MA, Tiedje JM. 1996. DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:316–322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ahn SJ, Costa J, Emanuel JR. 1996. PicoGreen quantitation of DNA: effective evaluation of samples pre- or post-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:2623–2625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wu LY, Liu X, Schadt CW, Zhou JZ. 2006. Microarray-based analysis of subnanogram quantities of microbial community DNAs by using whole-community genome amplification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:4931–4941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Liang YT, He ZL, Wu LY, Deng Y, Li GH, Zhou JZ. 2010. Development of a common oligonucleotide reference standard for microarray data normalization and comparison across different microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:1088–1094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. He ZL, Zhou JZ. 2008. Empirical evaluation of a new method for calculating signal-to-noise ratio for microarray data analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:2957–2966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Holm S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6:65–70 [Google Scholar]
- 38. Syswerda SP, Corbin AT, Mokma DL, Kravchenko AN, Robertson GP. 2011. Agricultural management and soil carbon storage in surface vs deep layers. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 75:92–101 [Google Scholar]
- 39. Lal R, Griffin M, Apt J, Lave L, Morgan MG. 2004. Ecology. Managing soil carbon. Science 304:393 doi:10.1126/science.1093079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Yang YH, Yao J, Hu S, Qi Y. 2000. Effects of agricultural chemicals on DNA sequence diversity of soil microbial community: a study with RAPD marker. Microb. Ecol. 39:72–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Sarathchandra SU, Ghani A, Yeates GW, Burch G, Cox NR. 2001. Effect of nitrogen and phosphate fertilisers on microbial and nematode diversity in pasture soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33:953–964 [Google Scholar]
- 42. Bobbink R. 1991. Effects of nutrient enrichment in Dutch chalk grassland. J. Appl. Ecol. 28:28–41 [Google Scholar]
- 43. Bobbink R, Hornung M, Roelofs JGM. 1998. The effects of air-borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi-natural European vegetation. J. Ecol. 86:717–738 [Google Scholar]
- 44. Clark CM, Tilman D. 2008. Loss of plant species after chronic low-level nitrogen deposition to prairie grasslands. Nature 451:712–715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Gough L, Osenberg CW, Gross KL, Collins SL. 2000. Fertilization effects on species density and primary productivity in herbaceous plant communities. Oikos 89:428–439 [Google Scholar]
- 46. Reich PB. 2009. Elevated CO2 reduces losses of plant diversity caused by nitrogen deposition. Science 326:1399–1402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Goldberg DE, Miller TE. 1990. Effects of different resource additions on species-diversity in an annual plant community. Ecology 71:213–225 [Google Scholar]
- 48. Suding KN, Collins SL, Gough L, Clark C, Cleland EE, Gross KL, Milchunas DG, Pennings S. 2005. Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:4387–4392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Vitousek PM, Aber JD, Howarth RW, Likens GE, Matson PA, Schindler DW, Schlesinger WH, Tilman D. 1997. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: sources and consequences. Ecol. Appl. 7:737–750 [Google Scholar]
- 50. Mader P, Fliessbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U. 2002. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:1694–1697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Sun HY, Deng SP, Raun WR. 2004. Bacterial community structure and diversity in a century-old manure-treated agroecosystem. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:5868–5874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Fontaine S, Bardoux G, Abbadie L, Mariotti A. 2004. Carbon input to soil may decrease soil carbon content. Ecol. Lett. 7:314–320 [Google Scholar]
- 53. Fontaine S, Mariotti A, Abbadie L. 2003. The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biol. Biochem. 35:837–843 [Google Scholar]
- 54. Harper JL, Hawksworth DL. 1994. Biodiversity: measurement and estimation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 345:5–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Fuhrman JA. 2009. Microbial community structure and its functional implications. Nature 459:193–199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Elfstrand S, Bath B, Martensson A. 2007. Influence of various forms of green manure amendment on soil microbial community composition, enzyme activity and nutrient levels in leek. Appl. Soil Ecol. 36:70–82 [Google Scholar]
- 57. Sekiguchi H, Kushida A, Takenaka S. 2007. Effects of cattle manure and green manure on the microbial community structure in upland soil determined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Microbes Environ. 22:327–335 [Google Scholar]
- 58. Cruz-Martinez K, Suttle KB, Brodie EL, Power ME, Andersen GL, Banfield JF. 2009. Despite strong seasonal responses, soil microbial consortia are more resilient to long-term changes in rainfall than overlying grassland. ISME J. 3:738–744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Xue K, Serohijos RC, Devare M, Thies JE. 2011. Decomposition rates and residue-colonizing microbial communities of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein Cry3Bb-expressing (Bt) and non-Bt corn hybrids in the field. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:839–846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




