Abstract
Bacillus subtilis is a Gram-positive, rod-shaped, spore-forming bacterium. We present the genome sequence of an undomesticated strain, BSP1, isolated from poultry. The sequence of the BSP1 genome supports the view that B. subtilis has a biphasic lifestyle, cycling between the soil and the animal gastrointestinal tract, and it provides molecular-level insight into the adaptation of B. subtilis to life under laboratory conditions.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
There is mounting evidence that Bacillus subtilis is not strictly a soil organism, but is instead an organism with a biphasic (soil and gut) life cycle (1–4); there is also evidence regarding the ability of B. subtilis spores to germinate in animal gut (5–7). In the animal gut, adaptive evolution has resulted in the establishment of commensal bacteria that live in symbiosis with their host (8). As a consequence of this relationship, the host benefits from the intestinal microflora, which itself impacts host physiology, biology, and immunology (9). The genome sequence we present here is that of an undomesticated strain, formerly isolate 200, renamed BSP1, isolated from organically reared broilers (1), and it must be compared to the genome of B. subtilis 168, which was one of the first prokaryotic genomes to be sequenced (10). Recent publications have reinforced the impact of this initial sequence (2, 11–13). BSP1, 168, and Bsn5 are strains of Bacillus subtilis subsp. subtilis (14; C. R. Serra, A. M. Earl, T. M. Barbosa, R. Kolter, and A. O. Henriques, unpublished data), whereas gtP20b and W23 are Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii strains (15, 16).
Over 100 Mb (105,914,666 bases through 1,025,436 reads) of raw sequence, translating into an average coverage of 26-fold, was used to assemble the genome of the undomesticated gut-associated B. subtilis strain BSP1. The genome consists of a single circular chromosome of 4,043,754 bp with an average G+C content of 43.87%.
Most of the BSP1 coding sequences are conserved and are arranged in a collinear manner in closely related B. subtilis 168. However, the circular chromosome in BSP1 is somewhat smaller than that in the closely related B. subtilis strain, due mainly to the absence of prophage islands, which are abundant in the B. subtilis 168 genome. Deletions covering about 250 kb were detected in the regions equivalent to B. subtilis prophages 2 to 7, SPβC2, and the skin element. These excisions have caused the loss of several negative regulators of Spo0A (rapE, rapK, rapI, and their companion phr genes), a key regulatory protein in many responses to the entry into stationary phase, including sporulation. This explains the important biological properties of BSP1, including its potent antimicrobial activity (AbrB-repressed sbo-alb operon; A7A1_0154 to A7A1_0162) and its ability to sporulate during growth, both of which may be beneficial in the gut (Serra et al., unpublished data). BSP1 also carries at least 200 genes not found in B. subtilis 168, most of which were presumably acquired horizontally, mainly from the closely related Bacillus licheniformis. Some of these genes appear to control complex properties and behaviors, such as colony morphology and biofilm architecture (bsmA homolog; A7A1_2008), mucosal adhesion through a sortase-dependent collagen-binding protein (functional YwpE sortase associated with the homologs of Cna-type collagen-binding proteins; A7A1_1084, A7A1_1083, and A7A1_1082), and galactoglucomannan utilization (gam genes; A7A1_2761 to A7A1_2769). These genes may represent the signatures of gut strains of B. subtilis. Overall, while supporting the view that B. subtilis has a biphasic lifestyle, cycling between soil and the animal gastrointestinal tract, the genome sequence also evidences molecular details of the domestication process.
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The genome sequence of B. subtilis subsp. subtilis strain BSP1 was deposited in NCBI GenBank under the accession no. CP003695.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by funds from DSM Nutritional Products, Ltd., and by grant QRLT-2000-01729 (EU, EU) to A.O.H. C.R.S. was the recipient of a Ph.D. fellowship (SFRH/BD/29397/06) from the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT).
Footnotes
Citation Schyns G, Serra CR, Lapointe T, Pereira-Leal JB, Potot S, Fickers P, Perkins JB, Wyss M, Henriques AO. 2013. Genome of a gut strain of Bacillus subtilis. Genome Announc. 1(1):e00184-12. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00184-12.
REFERENCES
- 1. Barbosa TM, Serra CR, La Ragione RM, Woodward MJ, Henriques AO. 2005. Screening for bacillus isolates in the broiler gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:968–978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Earl AM, Losick R, Kolter R. 2008. Ecology and genomics of Bacillus subtilis. Trends Microbiol. 16:269–275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Felske ADM. 2004. Ecology of bacillus species in soil, p 35–44 In Ricca E, Henriques AO, Cutting SM, Bacterial spore formers: probiotics and emerging applications. Horizon Scientific Press, London, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
- 4. Tam NK, Uyen NQ, Hong HA, Duc LH, Hoa TT, Serra CR, Henriques AO, Cutting SM. 2006. The intestinal life cycle of Bacillus subtilis and close relatives. J. Bacteriol. 188:2692–2700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cartman ST, La Ragione RM, Woodward MJ. 2008. Bacillus subtilis spores germinate in the chicken gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:5254–5258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Duc LH, Hong HA, Cutting SM. 2003. Germination of the spore in the gastrointestinal tract provides a novel route for heterologous antigen delivery. Vaccine 21:4215–4224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Leser TD, Knarreborg A, Worm J. 2008. Germination and outgrowth of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis spores in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs. J. Appl. Microbiol. 104:1025–1033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bäckhed F, Ley RE, Sonnenburg JL, Peterson DA, Gordon JI. 2005. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science 307:1915–1920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hooper LV, Gordon JI. 2001. Commensal host-bacterial relationships in the gut. Science 292:1115–1118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kunst F, Ogasawara N, Moszer I, Albertini AM, Alloni G, Azevedo V, Bertero MG, Bessières P, Bolotin A, Borchert S, Borriss R, Boursier L, Brans A, Braun M, Brignell SC, Bron S, Brouillet S, Bruschi CV, Caldwell B, Capuano V, Carter NM, Choi SK, Codani JJ, Connerton IF, Danchin A. 1997. The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature 390:249–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Barbe V, Cruveiller S, Kunst F, Lenoble P, Meurice G, Sekowska A, Vallenet D, Wang T, Moszer I, Médigue C, Danchin A. 2009. From a consortium sequence to a unified sequence: the Bacillus subtilis 168 reference genome a decade later. Microbiology 155:1758–1775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zeigler DR, Prágai Z, Rodriguez S, Chevreux B, Muffler A, Albert T, Bai R, Wyss M, Perkins JB. 2008. The origins of 168, W23, and other Bacillus subtilis legacy strains. J. Bacteriol. 190:6983–6995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Earl AM, Losick R, Kolter R. 2007. Bacillus subtilis genome diversity. J. Bacteriol. 189:1163–1170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Deng Y, Zhu Y, Wang P, Zhu L, Zheng J, Li R, Ruan L, Peng D, Sun M. 2011. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus subtilis BSn5, an endophytic bacterium of Amorphophallus konjac with antimicrobial activity for the plant pathogen Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora. J. Bacteriol. 193:2070–2071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Fan L, Bo S, Chen H, Ye W, Kleinschmidt K, Baumann HI, Imhoff JF, Kleine M, Cai D. 2011. Genome sequence of Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii gtP20b, isolated from the Indian Ocean. J. Bacteriol. 193:1276–1277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zeigler DR. 2011. The genome sequence of Bacillus subtilis subsp. spizizenii W23: insights into speciation within the B. subtilis complex and into the history of B. subtilis genetics. Microbiology 157:2033–2041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]