Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2013 Feb 7;1(1):e00165-12. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00165-12

Complete Genome Sequence of the Probiotic Enterococcus faecalis Symbioflor 1 Clone DSM 16431

Moritz Fritzenwanker a, Carsten Kuenne a, Andre Billion a, Torsten Hain a, Kurt Zimmermann b, Alexander Goesmann c, Trinad Chakraborty a, Eugen Domann a,
PMCID: PMC3569346  PMID: 23405346

Abstract

Here, we report the complete and annotated genome sequence of the probiotic Enterococcus faecalis Symbioflor 1 clone DSM 16431, included in a commercial probiotic product used for more than 50 years without any reports of infection. This sequence will provide new insights into the biology of this nonpathogenic and probiotic microorganism.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Enterococci are facultative anaerobic Gram-positive cocci. They are regular commensals of the gastrointestinal tract, the oral cavity, and the vagina in humans (1). Enterococci can cause a wide variety of diseases in humans, including urinary tract infection, bacteremia, endocarditis, peritonitis, and wound infection (2, 3). Nevertheless, Enterococcus faecalis has potential benefits for human health and is currently used as food-starter cultures and probiotics. These organisms are used in traditional Mediterranean cheeses and other fermented foods such as sausages, olives, and vegetables. Furthermore, enterococci have been used as probiotics to improve the intestinal microbial balance (4, 5).

Here, we report the complete and annotated genome sequence of the nonpathogenic probiotic E. faecalis Symbioflor 1 clone DSM 16431. It was originally isolated in the 1950s from the stool specimen of a healthy human adult and has been in use as a probiotic for more than 50 years without any report or documentation of infection. Based on toxicological studies it has been shown that the strain is safe and can be used for direct human application (6, 7). The overall transcriptional responses of pathogenic E. faecalis strains and the Symbioflor 1 probiotic strain to growth in urine are highly conserved, suggesting that it is the presence or absence of virulence and adaptive traits rather than expression levels of these factors that determines pathogenic potential (8).

Three different kinds of libraries were prepared for sequencing. Initially, a genomic shotgun plasmid library (~2-kb inserts) was constructed and sequenced with Sanger sequencing technology. Subsequently, a standard library of sheared genomic DNA was sequenced on the GS FLX sequencer from Roche (Basel, Switzerland). A hybrid assembly with reads from both technologies (Sanger, 13,131 reads; 9.9 Mb; 454 pyrosequencing, 206,726 reads, 47.8 Mb) was created with the GS de novo assembler. Gaps between contigs were closed by PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. For larger gaps, a fosmid library (~40-kb inserts) (CopyControl fosmid library production kit, Epicenter, Madison, WI) was used as a template for genome closure. To further improve consensus quality, we also performed a sequencing run on the Illumina MiSeq system using a standard Nextera library, yielding 3,134,284 reads giving a total of 399.5 Mb (amounting to 164-fold coverage). The final assembly was conducted with MIRA version 3.9.4 (9), and DNASTAR SeqMan version 8.02 was employed to close remaining gaps. The genome comprises 2,810,675 bp and was annotated by using RAST (10) and GenDB (11). The circular genome contains 2,733 coding sequences and 63 tRNAs. The average GC content was determined to be 37.72%. Of note, Symbioflor 1 contains two major deletions in proximity to the vanB-associated island and the efaB5 element, leading to the loss of vanB operon, bacteriocin, cytolysin L, enterococcal surface protein sp./efaA, gelatinase, and hyaluronidase genes (7, 12), thus providing important clues for its nonpathogenic nature. A unique region encoding a bacteriophage was detected at positions 1846700 through 1891973 by using PHAST (13).

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The genome sequence of E. faecalis Symbioflor 1 clone DSM 16431 has been deposited in the EMBL database under accession number HF558530.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Silke Zechel-Gran and Alexandra Amend for excellent technical assistance.

This work was supported by grants from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Germany, within the framework of the PathoGenoMik Network to E.D. (FKZ: PTJ-BIO/0313134), the research grant “Anthocyanins in fruit juices from berries—bioavailability and effect on the intestinal microbiota” to E.D. and T.C. (FKZ: 0315379A), and the German Centre of Infection Research (DZIF) to T.C. (FKZ: 80 00 701-2 HZI).

Footnotes

Citation Fritzenwanker M, Kuenne C, Billion A, Hain T, Zimmermann K, Goesmann A, Chakraborty T, Domann E. 2013. Complete genome sequence of the probiotic Enterococcus faecalis Symbioflor 1 clone DSM 16431. Genome Announc. 1(1):e00165-12. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00165-12.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Teixeira LM, Carvalho Mda G, Facklam RR. 2007. Enterococcus, p 430–442 In Baron EJ, Murray PR, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA. Manual of clinical microbiology, 9th ed ASM Press, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hunt CP. 1998. The emergence of enterococci as a cause of nosocomial infection. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 55:149–156 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Jett BD, Huycke MM, Gilmore MS. 1994. Virulence of enterococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 7:462–478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Marteau P, Seksik P, Lepage P, Doré J. 2004. Cellular and physiological effects of probiotics and prebiotics. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 4:889–896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ouwehand AC, Salminen S, Isolauri E. 2002. Probiotics: an overview of beneficial effects. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 82:279–289 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Christoffersen TE, Jensen H, Kleiveland CR, Dørum G, Jacobsen M, Lea T. 2012. In vitro comparison of commensal, probiotic and pathogenic strains of Enterococcus faecalis. Br. J. Nutr. 108:2043–2053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Domann E, Hain T, Ghai R, Billion A, Kuenne C, Zimmermann K, Chakraborty T. 2007. Comparative genomic analysis for the presence of potential enterococcal virulence factors in the probiotic Enterococcus faecalis strain Symbioflor 1. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 297:533–539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Vebø HC, Solheim M, Snipen L, Nes IF, Brede DA. 2010. Comparative genomic analysis of pathogenic and probiotic Enterococcus faecalis isolates, and their transcriptional responses to growth in human urine. PLoS One 5:e12489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chevreux B, Wetter T, Suhai S. 1999. Genome sequence assembly using trace signals and additional sequence information, p 45–56 In Computer science and biology: proceedings of the German conference on bioinformatics (GCB)99, Hannover, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Meyer F, Goesmann A, McHardy AC, Bartels D, Bekel T, Clausen J, Kalinowski J, Linke B, Rupp O, Giegerich R, Pühler A. 2003. GenDB: an open source genome annotation system for prokaryote genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:2187–2195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Paulsen IT, Banerjei L, Myers GS, Nelson KE, Seshadri R, Read TD, Fouts DE, Eisen JA, Gill SR, Heidelberg JF, Tettelin H, Dodson RJ, Umayam L, Brinkac L, Beanan M, Daugherty S, DeBoy RT, Durkin S, Kolonay J, Madupu R, Nelson W, Vamathevan J, Tran B, Upton J, Hansen T, Shetty J, Khouri H, Utterback T, Radune D, Ketchum KA, Dougherty BA, Fraser CM. 2003. Role of mobile DNA in the evolution of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis. Science 299:2071–2074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zhou Y, Liang Y, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Wishart DS. 2011. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:W347–W352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES