Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2013 Jan 31;1(1):e00052-12. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00052-12

Draft Genome Sequences of Five Strains in the Genus Thauera

Binbin Liu a,, Åsa Frostegård a, James P Shapleigh b
PMCID: PMC3569365  PMID: 23405361

Abstract

Thauera species are members of the betaproteobacteria and are most noted for their ability to metabolize aromatic compounds under anoxic conditions. Here, we announce the draft genome sequences of five Thauera strains in an effort to provide further genetic information as a resource for understanding the ecological function of this environmentally important genus.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The genus Thauera was proposed as a new genus in 1993 by Macy et al. (1) and was named after the German microbiologist Rudolf Thauer. This genus currently consists of nine named species and one recently announced novel species (2). Organisms within Thauera have been isolated from wastewater treatment plants, where they may be a dominant part of the microbial community (38). They are also found in other environments, such as soils and sediments (9, 10), and are known for their versatile metabolism. The first strain in this genus for which a completely sequenced genome was obtained was Thauera aminoaromatica MZ1T, which was isolated from activated sludge samples from an industrial wastewater treatment facility (7). The strain is noted for its ability to degrade various aromatic compounds and for production of abundant exopolysaccharide (11).

In this study, we sequenced the whole genomes of five Thauera strains: T. aminoaromatica S2, T. linaloolentis 47Lol, and Thauera spp. 27, 28, and 63 (Table 1). T. aminoaromatica S2 was found to be capable of degrading various aromatic substrates, including benzoate, phenylacetate, and p-cresol, under denitrifying conditions (4). T. linaloolentis 47Lol has been found to utilize aliphatic monoterpenes as the sole electron donor and carbon source under denitrifying conditions (10). Thauera sp. 27 and Thauera sp. 28 were isolated from a laboratory-scale denitrifying reactor fed with acetate and nitrate and seeded with methanogenic granules (12, 13). Our recent results based on a phenotypic comparison showed that strains in the genus Thauera can be divided into two distinct groups according to their denitrification-regulatory phenotype (DRP) characteristics (14); four strains were characterized by a rapid, complete onset (RCO) of expression of all denitrification genes, and one strain showed progressive onset (PO) of expression of denitrification genes (B. Liu and Å. Frostegård, unpublished data). To gain better insight into the genetic and biochemical mechanisms underlying the different denitrification phenotypes, whole-genome sequencing of these strains was undertaken.

TABLE 1.

Summary of information for the whole genomes of five Thauera strains: T. aminoaromatica S2, T. linaloolentis 47Lol, and Thauera spp. 27, 28, and 63

Strain Origin Place Phenotypic group G+C content (%)a Genome size (bp)b No. of predicted features (PEGs+ RNAs)c Accession no. No. of contigs (>200 bp) Reference(s)
Thauera sp. 27 Anaerobic sludge Michigan RCO 65.8 4,708,725 4,298 AMXB01000000 128 12, 13
Thauera sp. 28 Anaerobic sludge Michigan RCO 65.9 4,319,739 3,902 AMXA01000000 119 12, 13
T. linaloolentis 47Lol Activated sludge Germany RCO 66.6 4,259,404 3,927 AMXE01000000 220 10
Thauera sp. 63 Anaerobic sludge Michigan RCO 66.2 4,183,036 3,942 AMXC01000000 103 12, 13
T. aminoaromatica S2 Anoxic ditch sludge Constance, Germany PO 68.6 4,252,780 3,897 AMXD01000000 317 4
a

The G+C content was determined with all the contigs of each strain using Artemis.

b

The genome size was estimated using either Velvet or CLC Genomics Workbench; the result corresponding to the greater number of features in the RAST pipeline is shown.

c

Features predicted using the RAST pipeline. A protein-encoding gene (PEG) is equivalent to a CDS (coding sequence).

Genomic DNA was extracted according to the method described previously (15). Whole-genome sequencing of five Thauera strains (Table 1) was performed using both paired-end and mate-pair reads on an Illumina HiSeq2000 instrument (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) in the Norwegian Sequencing Centre (NSC; Oslo, Norway). The raw sequences were filtered by the FASTX-Toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/), and the quality of the reads was checked with the program FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). De novo assembly was performed using both Velvet version 1.2.07 (16) and CLC Genomics Workbench. Gene prediction and annotation were carried out using the RAST annotation server (17). The G+C content was calculated with the sequences of all the contigs of each strain using Artemis (18). Consistent with previous reports, the genome G+C contents of these strains were relatively high, ranging from 65.8% to 68.6%. Genome information for each strain is summarized in Table 1.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The draft genome sequences of the Thauera strains in this study have been deposited as whole-genome shotgun projects (BioProject ID no. PRJNA175409, PRJNA171225, PRJNA175412, PRJNA175413, and PRJNA175415) at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers AMXA00000000, AMXB00000000, AMXC00000000, AMXD00000000, and AMXE00000000. The versions described in this paper are the first versions, AMXA01000000, AMXB01000000, AMXC01000000, AMXD01000000, and AMXE01000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank C. Etchebehere and J. M. Tiedje for supplying Thauera spp. 27, 28, and 63.

This genome sequencing project was supported by the Norwegian Research Council Project no. 193601.

Footnotes

Citation Liu B, Frostegård Å, Shapleigh JP. 2013. Draft genome sequences of five strains in the genus Thauera. Genome Announc. 1(1):e00052-12. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00052-12.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Macy JM, Rech S, Auling G, Doersch M, Stackebrandt E, Sly LI. 1993. Thauera selenatis gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the beta subclass of Proteobacteria with a novel type of anaerobic respiration. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43:135–142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Yang GQ, Zhang J, Kwon SW, Zhou SG, Han LC, Chen M, Ma C, Zhuang L. 2012. Thauera humireducens sp. nov., a humus-reducing bacterium isolated from a microbial fuel cell. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.040956-0 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3. Liu B, Zhang F, Feng X, Liu Y, Yan X, Zhang X, Wang L, Zhao L. 2006. Thauera and Azoarcus as functionally important genera in a denitrifying quinolin-removal bioreactor as revealed by microbial community structure comparison. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 55:274–286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mechichi T, Stackebrandt E. Gad’on N, Fuchs G. 2002. Phylogenetic and metabolic diversity of bacteria degrading aromatic compounds under denitrifying conditions, and description of Thauera phenylacetica sp. nov., Thauera aminoaromaticasp. nov., and Azoarcus buckelii sp. nov. Arch. Microbiol. 178:26–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Hong X, Zhang X, Liu B, Mao Y, Liu Y, Zhao L. 2010. Structural differentiation of bacterial communities in indole-degrading bioreactors under denitrifying and sulfate-reducing conditions. Res. Microbiol. 161:687–693 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Shinoda Y, Sakai Y, Uenishi H, Uchihashi Y, Hiraishi A, Yukawa H, Yurimoto H, Kato N. 2004. Aerobic and anaerobic toluene degradation by a newly isolated denitrifying bacterium, Thauera sp. strain DNT-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:1385–1392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lajoie CA, Layton AC, Gregory IR, Sayler GS, Taylor DE, Meyers AJ. 2000. Zoogleal clusters and sludge dewatering potential in an industrial activated-sludge wastewater treatment plant. Water Environ. Res. 72:56–64 [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Dubbels BL, Sayavedra-Soto LA, Bottomley PJ, Arp DJ. 2009. Thauera butanivorans sp. nov., a C2-C9 alkane-oxidizing bacterium previously referred to as “Pseudomonas butanovora.” Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59:1576–1578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Song B, Ward BB. 2003. Nitrite reductase genes in halobenzoate degrading denitrifying bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 43:349–357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Foss S, Harder J. 1998. Thauera linaloolentis sp. nov. and Thauera terpenica sp. nov., isolated on oxygen-containing monoterpenes (linalool, menthol, and eucalyptol) nitrate. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 21:365–373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Jiang K, Sanseverino J, Chauhan A, Lucas S, Copeland A, Lapidus A, Rio TGD, Dalin E, Tice H, Bruce D, Goodwin L, Pitluck S, Sims D, Brettin T, Detter JC, Han C, Larimer F, Land M, Hauser L, Kyrpides NC, Mikhailova N, Moser S, Jegier P, Close D, DeBruyn JM, Wang Y, Layton AC, Allen MS, Sayler G. 2012. Complete genome sequence of Thauera aminoaromatica strain MZ1T. Stand. Genomic Sci. 6:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Etchebehere C, Errazquin MI, Cabezas A, Planzzola MJ, Mallo M, Lombardi P, Ottonello G, Borzacconi L, Muxi L. 2002. Sludge bed development in denitrifying reactors using different inocula-performance and microbiological aspects. Water Sci. Technol. 45:365–370 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Etchebehere C, Cabezas A, Dabert P, Muxí L. 2003. Evolution of the bacterial community during granules formation in denitrifying reactors followed by molecular, culture-independent techniques. Water Sci. Technol. 48:75–79 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bergaust L, Bakken LR, Frostegård Å. 2011. Denitrification regulatory phenotype, a new term for the characterization of denitrifying bacteria. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 39:207–212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Cleenwerck I, Vandemeulebroecke K, Janssens D, Swings J. 2002. Re-examination of the genus Acetobacter, with descriptions of Acetobacter cerevisiae sp. nov. and Acetobacter malorum sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52:1551-1558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18:821–829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, Barrell B. 2000. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 16:944–945 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES