Skip to main content
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine logoLink to American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
. 2013 Jan 15;187(2):125–129. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201208-1483OE

Seeing beyond the Bronchoscope to Increase the Diagnostic Yield of Bronchoscopic Biopsy

Lida P Hariri 1,2,3, Martin Villiger 2,3, Matthew B Applegate 2,4, Mari Mino-Kenudson 1,3, Eugene J Mark 1,3, Brett E Bouma 2,3, Melissa J Suter 2,3,4,
PMCID: PMC3570655  PMID: 23322794

The accurate diagnosis and molecular assessment of lung tumors are increasingly important in determining the optimal course of treatment for patients with lung cancer (13). This more personalized approach necessitates accurate tissue sampling to ensure the biopsy contains sufficient tumor for both morphologic diagnosis and molecular testing to determine the mutational status of the tumor (46). Tumor sampling may be accomplished by low-risk bronchoscopy techniques. However, the diagnostic yield of these approaches is variable because the biopsies can contain nontumor elements, such as areas of fibrotic tumor stroma and/or surrounding normal lung tissue (6). Diagnostic yields in transbronchial fine needle aspiration (TBNA) and transbronchial biopsy can significantly vary depending on the size and location of the nodule (710). The addition of endobronchial ultrasound guidance or electromagnetic navigation increases diagnostic yield, but the yields are still lower for lesions not more than 2.0 cm in diameter (56.3% for lesions ≤ 2.0 cm vs. 77.7% for lesions > 2.0 cm) (713). In vivo real-time biopsy site assessment could aid in lung nodule targeting and provide more selective tissue acquisition to increase the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopic biopsy. Implementation of novel optical imaging techniques that are complementary to traditional bronchoscopy could provide physicians with a valuable tool to microscopically assess a lung nodule before biopsy and determine the optimal site for tissue acquisition. Some of the results of these studies have been previously reported in the form of abstracts (14, 15).

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a nondestructive imaging tool that rapidly generates high-resolution (<10 μm) cross-sectional images of tissue with penetration depths approaching 2–3 mm (1618). OCT is a time-of-flight imaging technology in which images are generated by measuring the intensity of backscattered near-infrared light using low-coherence interferometry. This is similar in principle to measuring sound echoes reflected back from tissue in ultrasound. There are a number of catheter-based OCT systems that are commercially available, including both longitudinal and cross-sectional scanning catheters that range from 0.8 to 2.5 mm in diameter. OCT has been used to accurately detect and diagnose cardiovascular (1921) and gastrointestinal (17, 22, 23) pathology, and more recently has been used to assess the tracheobronchial tree and parenchyma in vivo (2433). OCT imaging of the normal bronchial wall enables visualization of the fine layered features of the airway, including epithelium, basement membrane, lamina propria, bronchial glands and ducts, vessels, and cartilage with surrounding perichondrium. Lung parenchyma appears as a lattice-like structure with signal-void alveoli (Figure 1A). OCT has been used to investigate airway-based lesions in the clinical setting, including dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, and invasive cancer (2629). More recently, preliminary OCT assessments of peripheral tumors have been performed ex vivo, including benign lesions such as hamartomas (32). These studies demonstrate that OCT is able to identify many of the features of the normal and diseased lung and may have a future role in diagnostic imaging.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) of lung parenchyma and tumor in ex vivo lung. (A) Normal lung parenchyma obtained by needle-based OCT. (B) Carcinoid tumor presenting as a peripheral lung nodule. (C) Necrosis in squamous cell carcinoma appearing as signal-poor regions with ill-defined borders (arrows). (D) Tumor-associated, dense desmoplastic fibrosis within a squamous cell carcinoma. Scale bars: 1 mm. The vertical backscattering, shadow artifacts, indicated by the asterisks in C, are artifacts from ink marks used to register polarization-sensitive OCT and histology.

Narrow-diameter, flexible OCT catheters compatible with the working channel of standard bronchoscopes have been developed for airway-based imaging and, more recently, needle-based OCT catheters have also been developed (3437) to facilitate imaging beyond the boundaries of the airway wall. These catheters include rigid needle catheters for transthoracic imaging (3537), and flexible catheters compatible with standard TBNA needles for transbronchial imaging (34). We have developed a transbronchial OCT needle probe compatible with standard bronchoscopes that may be used to rapidly assess needle placement before TBNA specimen collection (described by Tan and colleagues [34]). An example of inflated lung parenchyma imaged by needle-based OCT is demonstrated in Figure 1A. On the basis of previously established image interpretation criteria, OCT can readily distinguish airway wall and lung parenchyma (Figure 1A) from lung nodules (Figures 1B–1D) (32). This ability suggests OCT may assist in assessing whether a lung nodule has been accurately targeted for biopsy. Even when lung tumors are accurately targeted, nondiagnostic tissue specimens consisting predominantly of dense tumor fibrosis and/or necrosis can still be obtained, rendering the biopsy insufficient for diagnosis and molecular profiling (6). Structural OCT is capable of identifying necrosis, which has a distinct appearance characterized by well-defined, signal-poor regions (demonstrated in an example of squamous cell carcinoma with necrosis; Figure 1C). However, structural OCT lacks the contrast to reliably differentiate tumor from organized fibrosis or tumor-associated, dense desmoplastic fibrosis, as is exemplified in Figure 1B (carcinoid tumor) and 1D (central scar in squamous cell carcinoma). In Figure 2, the structural OCT images of the tumors (Figures 2A, 2D, and 2G) appear similar despite having varying compositions of tumor and fibrosis. Although structural OCT provides a useful method for accurate targeting of peripheral nodules and identifying necrosis, the differentiation of tumor from fibrosis is critical for effective biopsy guidance to maximize diagnostic yield.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) of tumor and tumor-associated desmoplasia in ex vivo lung. (A) Structural OCT of squamous cell carcinoma with dense desmoplastic fibrosis. (B) PS-OCT of squamous cell carcinoma with dense desmoplastic fibrosis, with high birefringence in the fibrotic component. (C) Trichrome stain of squamous cell carcinoma with dense desmoplastic fibrosis, displaying deep blue staining in areas of dense fibrosis. (D) Structural OCT of adenocarcinoma with early desmoplasia. (E) PS-OCT of adenocarcinoma with early desmoplasia showing moderate birefringence in the lower half, where more organized collagen is present, and less birefringence in the upper half, where tumor is admixed with young, poorly organized collagen and elastic fibers. (F) Trichrome stain confirming more organized desmoplasia in the lower half staining deeper blue and less organized desmoplasia in the upper half staining a lighter blue-gray. (G) Structural OCT of carcinoid tumor and (H) PS-OCT of carcinoid tumor showing little to no birefringence. In both the structural and PS-OCT images of the carcinoid, there is a high-signal intensity imaging artifact across the surface of the tissue sample that is commonly found in OCT images at air–tissue interfaces. (I) Trichrome stain confirming lack of significant collagen with the carcinoid. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Polarization-sensitive OCT (PS-OCT) generates microstructural images while simultaneously measuring tissue birefringence (3846). When light travels through birefringent tissues, the orthogonal polarization components of the light will undergo a phase retardation with respect to one another. The magnitude of this phase retardation is dependent on the orientation of the polarized state of the light with respect to the organized linear structures within the tissue. Highly linearly organized connective tissues, such as collagen, are therefore associated with a strong birefringence signature (4750). Birefringence detection is achieved in PS-OCT by modulating the polarization state of the source between distinct polarization states in successive A-lines (axial depth profiles) and then combining A-line pairs by Stokes vector (39) or Jones matrix (40) analysis. PS-OCT may provide a significant enhancement over traditional OCT in differentiating tumor from tumor-associated fibrosis.

Figure 2 demonstrates the ability of PS-OCT to differentiate tumor from fibrosis by detecting a strong birefringence signature in dense desmoplastic fibrosis in ex vivo lung tissue. High birefringence is observed in areas of dense fibrosis in the illustrated squamous cell carcinoma (Figures 2A–2C), which correlates with regions of fibrosis on trichrome staining (seen as regions with deep blue staining; Figure 2C). In tumors with early desmoplastic response surrounding invasive adenocarcinoma (Figures 2D–2F), areas of dense collagen display high birefringence (Figure 2E, lower half), whereas areas with young, poorly organized collagen and elastic fibers admixed with malignant glands show lower birefringence (Figure 2E, upper half). Tumors with little intervening connective tissue, such as carcinoid tumors (Figures 2G–2I), show little to no birefringence signal. Trichrome staining confirms the presence of both early desmoplasia with poorly organized collagen fibers within the adenocarcinoma (regions of light blue-gray staining; Figure 2F) and the absence of prominent connective tissue in the carcinoid (Figure 2I).

The advantage of polarization sensitive imaging is further highlighted in Figure 3, where a solid poorly differentiated carcinoma is surrounded by dense desmoplastic fibrosis in an ex vivo lung specimen. Structural OCT (Figure 3A) lacks the ability to clearly distinguish the areas of solid carcinoma from fibrosis. However, PS-OCT (Figure 3B) visibly delineates the fibrosis from carcinoma, with high birefringence signal in the regions of fibrosis and lack of birefringence in the adjacent solid carcinoma. The boundary between the solid carcinoma and fibrosis clearly visualized with PS-OCT is confirmed with matched histology (Figure 3C). These results suggest that PS-OCT could serve as a powerful imaging technology for assessing tissue acquisition sites within lung nodules by drastically enhancing differentiation between tumor and fibrosis.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) of poorly differentiated carcinoma with surrounding fibrosis in ex vivo lung. (A) Structural OCT does not clearly show a distinction between solid carcinoma and adjacent fibrosis. Calcifications within the fibrosis can be seen as signal-poor structures (C). (B) PS-OCT shows a clear delineation between solid carcinoma (left of line) and fibrosis (right of line), with no birefringence signal in the regions of carcinoma and high birefringence signal in the regions of fibrosis. (C) Matched histology confirming the demarcation between carcinoma and fibrosis. Scale bars: 1 mm.

PS-OCT shows significant potential for biopsy guidance. However, this work was performed in ex vivo lung resection specimens and may potentially have some limitations in translation to in vivo imaging, such as motion artifacts, blood contamination, and the development of appropriate catheter designs. All of these potential limitations also apply to structural OCT, which has been successfully performed endobronchially in pilot clinical studies with similar image quality (2433), including imaging of airway-based masses and alveolar attachments. Catheter-based PS-OCT systems are not currently commercially available, but may be implemented by modulating the polarization state of a structural OCT system light source without any modification to the imaging catheters (4146). We therefore do not anticipate any difficulties in translating PS-OCT into the clinical setting.

Accurate diagnosis and molecular profiling are central to targeted therapy in lung cancer. However, standard approaches for obtaining tissue specimens often result in the collection of specimens containing insufficient tumor. Structural OCT may be useful for targeting nodules and identifying necrosis, but it lacks the ability to reliably differentiate fibrosis from tumor. Our results demonstrate that PS-OCT provides complementary information that may be leveraged to ensure that the collected specimens have high tumor content by avoiding nondiagnostic tissues including fibrosis. Together, structural and polarization-sensitive OCT provide a synergistic depiction of both tissue microstructure and composition that may be useful in guiding biopsy site selection and optimizing tumor content for both diagnosis and molecular profiling. Although these results are promising, this work is still in the clinical research stage and further large-scale in vivo studies are needed to fully assess the potential sensitivity and specificity of PS-OCT in guiding lung biopsy before widespread clinical adoption.

Supplementary Material

Disclosures

Footnotes

Supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (grants R00CA134920 and P41EB01590) and the American Lung Association (grant RG-194681-N).

Author Contributions: Conception and design: L.P.H., M.J.S.; technology development: M.V., B.E.B., M.J.S.; data collection: L.P.H., M.V., M.B.A., M.J.S.; analysis and interpretation: L.P.H., M.V., M.B.A., M.M.-K., E.J.M., B.E.B., M.J.S.; drafting the manuscript for important intellectual content: L.P.H., M.J.S.; critical review of manuscript: L.P.H., M.V., M.B.A., M.M.-K., E.J.M., B.E.B., M.J.S.

Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.

References

  • 1.Sequist LV, Bell DW, Lynch TJ, Haber DA. Molecular predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:587–595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dempke WC, Suto T, Reck M. Targeted therapies for non–small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2010;67:257–274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mok TS. Personalized medicine in lung cancer: what we need to know. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2011;8:661–668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mukhopadhyay S, Katzenstein AL. Subclassification of non–small cell lung carcinomas lacking morphologic differentiation on biopsy specimens: utility of an immunohistochemical panel containing TTF-1, napsin A, p63, and CK5/6. Am J Surg Pathol 2011;35:15–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cooper WA, O’Toole S, Boyer M, Horvath L, Mahar A. What’s new in non–small cell lung cancer for pathologists: the importance of accurate subtyping, EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements. Pathology 2011;43:103–115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coghlin CL, Smith LJ, Bakar S, Stewart KN, Devereux GS, Nicolson MC, Kerr KM. Quantitative analysis of tumor in bronchial biopsy specimens. J Thoracic Oncol 2010;5:448–452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baaklini WA, Reinoso MA, Gorin AB, Sharafkaneh A, Manian P. Diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 2000;117:1049–1054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gould MK, Fletcher J, Iannettoni MD, Lynch WR, Midthun DE, Naidich DP, Ost DE. Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007;132(3 Suppl):108S–130S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rivera MP, Mehta AC. Initial diagnosis of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 2007;132(3 Suppl):131S–148S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wang Memoli JS, Nietert PJ, Silvestri GA. Meta-analysis of guided bronchoscopy for the evaluation of the pulmonary nodule. Chest 2012;142:385–393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mazzone P, Jain P, Arroliga AC, Matthay RA. Bronchoscopy and needle biopsy techniques for diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Clin Chest Med 2002;23:137–158; ix [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shure D, Fedullo PF. Transbronchial needle aspiration of peripheral masses. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983;128:1090–1092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Steinfort DP, Khor YH, Manser RL, Irving LB. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2011;37:902–910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Suter MJ. Optical coherence tomography [abstract]. Presented at the 17th World Congress for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology, Cleveland, OH, 2012.
  • 15.Suter MJ, Hariri LP, Chee A, Tan KM, Tearney GJ, Channick C, Lanuti M, Mino-Kenudson M, Bouma BE. Optical coherence tomography for increasing the diagnostic yield of TBNA [abstract]. Presented at the Meeting of the European Respiratory Society, Vienna, Austria, 2012.
  • 16.Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 1991;254:1178–1181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bouma BE, Tearney GJ, Compton CC, Nishioka NS. High-resolution imaging of the human esophagus and stomach in vivo using optical coherence tomography. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:467–474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yun SH, Tearney GJ, Vakoc BJ, Shishkov M, Oh WY, Desjardins AE, Suter MJ, Chan RC, Evans JA, Jang IK, et al. Comprehensive volumetric optical microscopy in vivo. Nat Med 2006;12:1429–1433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brezinski ME, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE, Izatt JA, Hee MR, Swanson EA, Southern JF, Fujimoto JG. Optical coherence tomography for optical biopsy: properties and demonstration of vascular pathology. Circulation 1996;93:1206–1213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tearney GJ, Waxman S, Shishkov M, Vakoc BJ, Suter MJ, Freilich MI, Desjardins AE, Oh WY, Bartlett LA, Rosenberg M, et al. Three-dimensional coronary artery microscopy by intracoronary optical frequency domain imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:752–761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fujimoto JG, Boppart SA, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE, Pitris C, Brezinski ME. High resolution in vivo intra-arterial imaging with optical coherence tomography. Heart 1999;82:128–133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tearney GJ, Brezinski ME, Bouma BE, Boppart SA, Pitris C, Southern JF, Fujimoto JG. In vivo endoscopic optical biopsy with optical coherence tomography. Science 1997;276:2037–2039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Suter MJ, Vakoc BJ, Yachimski PS, Shishkov M, Lauwers GY, Mino-Kenudson M, Bouma BE, Nishioka NS, Tearney GJ. Comprehensive microscopy of the esophagus in human patients with optical frequency domain imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;68:745–753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Coxson HO, Lam S. Quantitative assessment of the airway wall using computed tomography and optical coherence tomography. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2009;6:439–443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Coxson HO, Quiney B, Sin DD, Xing L, McWilliams AM, Mayo JR, Lam S. Airway wall thickness assessed using computed tomography and optical coherence tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;177:1201–1206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Michel RG, Kinasewitz GT, Fung KM, Keddissi JI. Optical coherence tomography as an adjunct to flexible bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of lung cancer: a pilot study. Chest 2010;138:984–988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Suter MJ, Riker DR, Gallagher KA, Thiesse J, Shishkov M, Mino-Kenudson M, Bouma BE, Beamis JF, Tearney GJ. Real-time comprehensive microscopy of the pulmonary airways: a pilot clinical study [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;181:A5159 [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tsuboi M, Hayashi A, Ikeda N, Honda H, Kato Y, Ichinose S, Kato H. Optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of bronchial lesions. Lung Cancer 2005;49:387–394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lam S, Standish B, Baldwin C, McWilliams A, leRiche J, Gazdar A, Vitkin AI, Yang V, Ikeda N, MacAulay C. In vivo optical coherence tomography imaging of preinvasive bronchial lesions. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:2006–2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Williamson JP, Armstrong JJ, McLaughlin RA, Noble PB, West AR, Becker S, Curatolo A, Noffsinger WJ, Mitchell HW, Phillips MJ, et al. Measuring airway dimensions during bronchoscopy using anatomical optical coherence tomography. Eur Respir J 2010;35:34–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Williamson JP, McLaughlin RA, Phillips MJ, Armstrong JJ, Becker S, Walsh JH, Sampson DD, Hillman DR, Eastwood PR. Using optical coherence tomography to improve diagnostic and therapeutic bronchoscopy. Chest 2009;136:272–276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hariri LP, Applegate MB, Mino-Kenudson M, Mark EJ, Medoff BD, Luster AD, Bouma BE, Tearney GJ, Suter MJ. Volumetric optical frequency domain imaging of pulmonary pathology with precise correlation to histopathology. Chest (In press) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Whiteman SC, Yang Y, Gey van Pittius D, Stephens M, Parmer J, Spiteri MA. Optical coherence tomography: real-time imaging of bronchial airways microstructure and detection of inflammatory/neoplastic morphologic changes. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:813–818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tan KM, Shishkov M, Chee A, Applegate MB, Boume BE, Suter MJ. Flexible transbronchial optical frequency domain imaging smart needle for biopsy guidance. Biomed Opt Express 2012;3:1947–1954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lorenser D, Yang X, Kirk RW, Quirk BC, McLaughlin RA, Sampson DD. Ultrathin side-viewing needle probe for optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett 2011;36:3894–3896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Quirk BC, McLaughlin RA, Curatolo A, Kirk RW, Noble PB, Sampson DD. In situ imaging of lung alveoli with an optical coherence tomography needle probe. J Biomed Opt 2011;16:036009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kuo WC, Kim J, Shemonski ND, Chaney EJ, Spillman DR, Jr, Boppart SA. Real-time three-dimensional optical coherence tomography image-guided core-needle biopsy system. Biomed Opt Express 2012;3:1149–1161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.de Boer JF, Milner TE. Review of polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography and Stokes vector determination. J Biomed Opt 2002;7:359–371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Park B, Pierce M, Cense B, de Boer J. Real-time multi-functional optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2003;11:782–793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Park BH, Pierce MC, Cense B, de Boer JF. Jones matrix analysis for a polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography system using fiber-optic components. Opt Lett 2004;29:2512–2514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Oh WY, Vakoc BJ, Yun SH, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE. Single-detector polarization-sensitive optical frequency domain imaging using high-speed intra A-line polarization modulation. Opt Lett 2008;33:1330–1332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Oh WY, Yun SH, Vakoc BJ, Shishkov M, Desjardins AE, Park BH, de Boer JF, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE. High-speed polarization sensitive optical frequency domain imaging with frequency multiplexing. Opt Express 2008;16:1096–1103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang EZ, Vakoc BJ. Polarimetry noise in fiber-based optical coherence tomography instrumentation. Opt Express 2011;19:16830–16842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Burns JA, Kim KH, deBoer JF, Anderson RR, Zeitels SM. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography imaging of benign and malignant laryngeal lesions: an in vivo study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;145:91–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kim KH, Burns JA, Bernstein JJ, Maguluri GN, Park BH, de Boer JF. In vivo 3D human vocal fold imaging with polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography and a MEMS scanning catheter. Opt Express 2010;18:14644–14653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Suter MJ, Tearney GJ, Wang-Yuhl O, Bouma BE. Progress in intracoronary optical coherence tomography. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 2010;16:706–714 [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wolman M, Kasten FH. Polarized light microscopy in the study of the molecular structure of collagen and reticulin. Histochemistry 1986;85:41–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kiraly K, Hyttinen MM, Lapvetelainen T, Elo M, Kiviranta I, Dobai J, Modis L, Helminen HJ, Arokoski JP. Specimen preparation and quantification of collagen birefringence in unstained sections of articular cartilage using image analysis and polarizing light microscopy. Histochem J 1997;29:317–327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nadkarni SK, Pierce MC, Park BH, de Boer JF, Whittaker P, Bouma BE, Bressner JE, Halpern E, Houser SL, Tearney GJ. Measurement of collagen and smooth muscle cell content in atherosclerotic plaques using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1474–1481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ugryumova N, Jacobs J, Bonesi M, Matcher SJ. Novel optical imaging technique to determine the 3-D orientation of collagen fibers in cartilage: variable-incidence angle polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17:33–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Disclosures

Articles from American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine are provided here courtesy of American Thoracic Society

RESOURCES