Abstract
Nucleotide excision repair (NER) and base excision repair (BER) pathways are DNA repair pathways that are important in carcinogenesis and in response to DNA damaging chemotherapy. ERCC1 and ERCC2 are important molecular markers for NER; XRCC1 and PARP1 are important molecular markers for BER. Functional polymorphisms have been described that are associated with altered expression levels of these genes, and with altered DNA repair capability. We assayed genomic DNA from 156 Americans of European descent (EAs) and 164 Americans of African descent (AAs), for the allelic frequencies of specific polymorphisms of ERCC1 N118N (500C>T), ERCC1 C8092A, ERCC2 K751Q (2282A>C), XRCC1 R399Q (1301G>A), XRCC1 R194W (685C>T) and PARP1 V762A (2446T>C). Differences were observed between EAs and AAs in the allelic frequencies of the ERCC1 N118N polymorphism (p=0.000000). Differences were also observed between these two ethnic groups for ERCC2 K751Q (p=0.006675), XRCC1 R399Q (p=0.000000), PARP1 V762A (p=0.000001). The ERCC1 N118N polymorphic variant that is seen most commonly in EAs is associated with a measurable reduction in NER function. ERCC1 mediated reduction in NER functionality impacts the repair of cisplatin-DNA lesions.
Keywords: Platinum Chemotherapy, Pharmacogenetics, DNA Repair, NER, BER, Oncology, Ethnic Disparity
INTRODUCTION
Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the DNA repair pathway that repairs bulky lesions that are covalently bound to DNA bases. This includes DNA damage from ultraviolet light, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and selected anticancer pharmaceuticals such as the platinum compounds, e.g., cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin (1, 2). ERCC1 and ERCC2 are two of the sixteen proteins that participate in NER to excise the bulky lesion from the DNA strand (3, 4). ERCC1 performs a number of functions, and, along with XPF, is essential for the 5' incision into the DNA strand that releases bulky DNA lesions (5, 6). ERCC2 is a 5'-3' helicase that participates in DNA strand separation, prior to the 5' incision step performed by the ERCC1-XPF heterodimer (7, 8). ERCC1, as well as ERCC2, are considered to be clinically useful molecular predictors for overall NER activity, and have been studied in bladder, lung, ovarian, colorectal, and other cancers where platinum compounds are used (9–18).
Spontaneous DNA hydrolysis, oxidative damage to DNA, as well as simple alkylations to DNA bases are repaired by base excision repair (BER) pathway. BER has not been as well studied as NER in the setting of anti-cancer chemotherapy. However, data suggests that BER may play a role in clinical and cellular resistance to simple alkylating agents (19). The important enzymes involved in BER include XRCC1 and PARP1. XRCC1 stimulates endonuclease activities following the excision of a damaged nucleotide, and acts as both a scaffold and a regulator for other BER proteins (20). PARP1 is required for XRCC1 function at sites of oxidative DNA damage (21).
There are several common diseases where there is a long history of ethnic differences in treatment outcomes and mortality. These include breast cancer, prostate cancer, lung cancer, and colorectal cancer as summarized in Table 1. Breast cancer is treated with adriamycin and cyclophosphamide, drugs which cause oxidative damage to DNA (22) and alkylation of DNA, respectively (23). In these circumstances, BER may be of major importance. Lung cancer is commonly treated with a cisplatin or carboplatin based regimens (24), while colorectal cancer is commonly treated with an oxaliplatin-based combination (25). In lung cancer and colorectal cancer, NER appears to be the most important DNA repair mechanism (1). Bladder cancer, cervical cancer, stomach cancer, and head and neck malignancies are also treated with DNA damaging therapies and have had ethnic differences in disease outcome observed (26).
Table 1.
Cancer type | Treatment | Ethnic groups (# of samples) | Major findings | OR (95% CI)/P value | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Breast cancer | Not defined. | AA* (185) and EA (10,937) | Overall survival significantly favored EAs | 2.27 (1.82,2.84) | (46) |
Surgery, radiation and adjuvant chemotherapy | AA (771) and EA (5651) | Increased risk of death in AA patients | 1.57 (1.18,2.10)* | (47) | |
Surgery, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil | AA (543) and EA (7582) | Increased death in AA patients | 1.21 (1.01,1.46)† 1.18 (1.03,1.34)‡ |
(48) | |
Prostate cancer | Orchiectomy or LHRH analogue therapy | AA (55) and EA (90) | No difference | (49) | |
Surgery, radiation, hormone therapy and others | AA (14,307) and EA (108,067) | Increased risk of death in AA patients | 1.61 (1.50,1.72)†† 0.99(0.92,1.06)‡‡ |
(50) | |
Lung cancer | Not defined. | AA and EA, numbers not defined | Lower 5-year survival rate in AA patients. | P ≤0.0001 | (51) |
Colorectal cancer | Surgery | AA (199) and EA (292) | Lower 5- and 10-year survival rate in AA | 1.67 (1.21,2.33)††† 1.52 (1.12,2.07)‡‡‡ |
(26) |
Rectal cancer | Methyl-lomustine, vincristine, fluorouracil, leucovorin and/or radiation therapy after surgery | AA (104) and EA (1,070) | Higher mortality in AA patients | 1.45 (1.09,1.93) | (52) |
Colon cancer | Not defined. | AA (454) and EA (521) | Higher risk of death among AA patients after adjusted for stage | 1.2 (1.1,1.5) | (53) |
EA: Americans of European descent, AA: Americans of African descent
Breast-cancer-specific survival, adjusted for tumor characteristics and major treatments
Lymph node-negative disease
Lymph node-positive disease
Adjusted only for age
Adjusted for stage, treatment, grade, socioeconomic status and year of diagnosis
Within 5 years of surgery
Within 10 years of surgery.
Ethnic disparity in treatment outcomes is a problem that is receiving increased recognition in clinical oncology, but has been poorly studied. It is not completely clear whether differences noted between EAs and AAs in treatment outcomes are due to matters of patient access to care, differences in medical care delivery, differences in clinical response to the same therapies, or most likely, a combination of all of these. The molecular causes of clinical resistance to chemotherapy have been elucidated for some of the commonly used anticancer agents. For cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin, the NER DNA repair pathway appears to be of great importance(1), while agents that generate oxidative DNA damage within cells, or produce simple alkylations to DNA, are more influenced by the BER pathway (27, 28). This information led us to investigate the following: if ethnic differences exist in the clinical treatment outcomes of patients who are treated with drugs that may be impacted by NER and/or by BER, are these outcomes associated with ethnic differences in polymorphism frequency in genes that are involved in these DNA repair pathways.
ERCC1, ERCC2, XRCC1 and PARP1, each have been reported to have polymorphic variants that appear to impact the functioning of the respective gene. Also, for ERCC1, ERCC2 and XRCC1, the polymorphic variants have been associated with clinically important endpoints. The aim of this study is to assess the allelic frequency of the note polymorphisms in the genes ERCC1, ERCC2, XRCC1 and PARP1.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
320 whole blood samples from healthy male volunteers (Valley Biomedical Inc., Winchester VA) were analyzed. All volunteers had signed informed consent to allow their samples to be used for genotyping, and none had a diagnosis of cancer.
Plasma was used to isolate genomic DNA according to the manufacturer's instructions using the UltraSens Virus Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using the Platinum Taq PCR Kit from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) with gene-specific primers. PCR reactions were denatured at 94°C for 5 min, followed by denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec; annealing at optimal temperature for each pair of primers for 30 sec and synthesis for 30 sec at 72°C for 40 cycles; the final extension was carried out at 72°C for 7 min. Primers and PCR conditions used in this study will be provided per request.
Direct nucleotide sequencing PCR was conducted using the Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction kit V3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and an ABI Prism 3130 Genetic Analyzer using the manufacturers instructions.
For each SNP, p values were calculated by Chi-square test with 1 degree of freedom based on allele frequency using Number Cruncher Statistical Software (NCSS), Kaysville, Utah.
RESULTS
A summary of the six polymorphisms studied is provided in Table 2. The genotype distribution of each SNP is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p>0.05). No genotype frequency differences were observed between EAs and AAs for the ERCC1 C8092A polymorphism. However, significant differences in genotype frequency were noted for the ERCC1 N118N (500C>T) transition (p=0.000000). The CC genotype occurred more frequently in AAs (76%) as compared to EAs (21%). However, the TT genotype is seen in only 3% of AAs and in 30% of EAs. The CT genotype is seen in 21% and 49% of the respective groups. Reed and colleagues have shown that the TT genotype is associated with reduced expression of ERCC1, reduced cisplatin-DNA adduct repair, and increased sensitivity to cisplatin (27, 28).
Table 2.
Gene | Genotype | EA# | AA | Allele | EA | AA | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC1‡ N118N (500C>T) |
CC CT TT TOTAL |
23(0.21)* 53(0.49) 32(0.30) 108 |
96(0.76) 27(0.21) 4(0.03) 127 |
C T TOTAL |
99(0.46) 117(0.54) 216 |
219(0.86) 35(0.14) 254 |
<0.000001 |
ERCC1 C8092A |
CC AC AA TOTAL |
77(0.53) 59(0.40) 10(0.07) 146 |
74(0.52) 56(0.40) 11(0.08) 141 |
C A TOTAL |
213(0.73) 79(0.27) 292 |
204(0.72) 78(0.28) 282 |
0.870913 |
ERCC2 K751Q (2282A>C) |
AA AC CC TOTAL |
49(0.42) 56(0.47) 13(0.11) 118 |
81(0.56) 57(0.40) 6(0.04) 144 |
A C TOTAL |
154(0.65) 82(0.35) 236 |
219(0.76) 69(0.24) 288 |
0.006675 |
XRCC1 R399Q (1301G>A) |
GG AG AA TOTAL |
49(0.46) 47(0.44) 10(0.10) 106 |
113(0.80) 26(0.19) 2(0.01) 141 |
G A |
145(0.68) 67(0.32) 212 |
252(0.89) 30(0.11) 282 |
<0.00000l |
XRCC1 R194W (685C>T) |
CC CT TT TOTAL |
120(0.87) 17(0.12) 1(0.01) 138 |
133(0.90) 14(0.09) 1(0.01) 148 |
C T TOTAL |
257(0.93) 19(0.07) 276 |
280(0.95) 16(0.05) 296 |
0.460941 |
PARP1 V762A (2446T>C) |
TT CT CC TOTAL |
80(0.67) 32(0.27) 7(0.06) 119 |
108(0.91) 11(0.09) 0(0) 119 |
T C TOTAL |
192(0.81) 46(0.19) 238 |
227(0.95) 11(0.05) 238 |
0.000001 |
Indicates: gene name, amino acid change and position, nucleotide change and the position.
EA: Americans of European descent, AA: Americans of African descent.
Indicates: Count (frequency).
For the ERCC2 K751Q (2282A>C) polymorphism, there were differences between EAs and AAs in the distribution of the AA, AC, and CC genotypes were noted (p=0.006675). The AA genotype was seen more frequently in AAs (56% versus 42%), but the other two genotypes were observed more frequently in EAs: AC (47% versus 40%) and CC (11% versus 4%).
For the XRCC1 R399Q (1301G>A) polymorphism, substantial differences between ethnic groups were also noted (p=0.000000). The GG genotype occurred in 80% of AAs, but only in 46% of EAs. The other two genotypes occurred more frequently in EAs: AG (44% versus 19%), and AA (10% versus 1%). The XRCC1 R194W (685C>T) polymorphism did not differ in genotype frequency between ethnic groups.
The TT genotype of PARP1 V762A (2446T>C) occurred more frequently in AAs than EAs (91% versus 67%; p=0.000001). And the other genotypes occurred more frequently in EAs: CT (27% versus 9%), and CC (6% versus 0%).
DISCUSSION
We assessed genomic DNA from 156 EA individuals, and 164 AA individuals, for allelic frequency of the noted polymorphisms in the genes ERCC1, ERCC2, XRCC1 and PARP1. Our data suggest a profound difference between these two ethnic groups in three genes: ERCC1, XRCC1 and PARP1.
Of the differences demonstrated between ethnic groups, one of the most interesting is the difference observed for the N118N polymorphism of ERCC1. The polymorphism of AAC to AAT at codon 118 of ERCC1 was first reported by Reed and colleagues (27, 28). This codon change results in the same amino acid, but the C>T transition decreases the translation rate from mRNA to protein by 50% (29). This polymorphism was noted to be associated with reduced mRNA expression of ERCC1, reduced repair of platinum-DNA adduct, and greater sensitivity to platinum compounds (29, 30). Codon 118 of ERCC1 has also been studied in several malignancies, such as lung cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, and other malignancies (1, 9–18). Our data suggest the possibility that reduced NER capacity may occur more commonly in EAs that carry the variant T allele more frequently, and this might result in greater sensitivity to platinum compounds in EAs or AAs. This would be consistent with the observed improved survival rates in EAs compared to AAs in malignancies where platinum compounds are important components of therapy, including lung, colorectal, head/neck and ovarian cancers.
Although several studies also suggested C8092A mutation in the 3'-UTR of ERCC1 an indicator of altered chemo-sensitivity (29) or cancer risk (31), we did not observe differences in genotype distribution of this polymorphism between EAs and AAs. Therefore, this polymorphism may be important to risk and clinical outcome in a similar fashion in both populations, but is likely not associated with health disparities between EAs and AAs.
ERCC2 is a DNA helicase subunit of the transcription factor IIH, or TFIIH and catalyzes a local unwinding around DNA lesion in a 5'->3' direction. The TFIIH-mediated opening generates junctions between duplex and single stranded DNA that in turn could be cleaved by ERCC1-XPF heterodimer. ERCC2 has a polymorphism at codon 751, K751Q, which is of particular interest. The codon 751 wild type of A/A has been associated with suboptimal DNA repair (13). Also, the A/A genotype has been seen with greater frequency in patients with colorectal cancer that respond to oxaliplatin based chemotherapy (18). These patients also show longer median survival time. However, the C/C variant homozygote is associated with reduced DNA repair capacity in patients with lung cancer (32), is significantly associated with risk and outcome in acute myeloid leukemia (33), and is overrepresented in patients with lung cancer of Chinese extraction (34). The interethnic variance of ERCC2 polymorphisms was previously reported among European, African and Asian populations (35). The lowest variant allele frequency occurred in Asian and the highest in European, with African having a median variance rate. However, the mixed clinical picture for ERCC2 makes it difficult to interpret the ethnic differences in allelic frequencies that we observe in this report. We reported here that significantly low frequency of variant ERCC2 K751Q was detected in AAs.
Base Excision Repair pathway protects cells from endogenous DNA damage induced by spontaneous hydrolysis and/or reactive oxygen species. Meanwhile, it is also important to resist lesions caused by ionizing radiation and alkylating agents. A critical component of BER is XRCC1, for which, one relevant polymorphism is at codon 399. This point mutation is in the BRCT1 domain, which provides binding site for PARP1 polymerase (20). The wild type G/G genotype appears to be associated with increased sensitivity to platinum based chemotherapy in Asian populations (36) and in one study of 112 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (37), while the variant allele showed improved survival in one Spanish population (38) and in bladder cancer (17). The A/A genotype is associated with smoke-induced pancreatic cancer (39), and is associated with breast cancer risk in AAs (40).
Another prevalent SNP in XRCC1 is at codon 194, which is in a possible binding site for several protein partners in BER and the positively charged arginine is changed to a hydrophobic tryptophan. This polymorphism is susceptible to affect binding and DNA repair efficiency (20) and the variant allele was associated to better response to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (41). Our data indicated significantly low frequency of XRCC1 R399Q, but not R194W, in AAs. Thus, the polymorphism of XRCC1 R399Q may be informative in health disparity between the two populations.
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1 plays various roles in molecular processes including DNA damage detection and repair. A common PARP1 polymorphism at codon 762 results in the substitution of valine by alanine in the catalytic domain. This change was proven to dramatically reduce the enzymatic activity (42). The variant genotype contributes to prostate cancer susceptibility and altered DNA repair function to oxidative damage (43), association with risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Chinese population (44) and increased risk of smoking-related lung cancer (45). The prevalence of variant genotype is extremely low in AAs (0% in our samples), which may indicate better protein function of PARP1 in this population.
Our data suggests the possibility that a comparatively modest reduction in base excision repair may occur more commonly in EAs. This would imply greater sensitivity to chemotherapy agents that alkylate DNA, such as cyclophosphamide, and/or to agents that generate free radicals that damage DNA, such as adriamycin. This would be consistent with observed differences in response to therapy in breast cancer, comparing EAs and AAs.
REFERENCE
- 1.Reed E. ERCC1 and clinical resistance to platinum-based therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:6100–2. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Reed E. ERCC1 measurements in clinical oncology. The New England journal of medicine. 2006;355:1054–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe068162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mu D, Hsu DS, Sancar A. Reaction mechanism of human DNA repair excision nuclease. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1996;271:8285–94. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.14.8285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mu D, Park CH, Matsunaga T, Hsu DS, Reardon JT, Sancar A. Reconstitution of human DNA repair excision nuclease in a highly defined system. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1995;270:2415–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.6.2415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.van Duin M, de Wit J, Odijk H, et al. Molecular characterization of the human excision repair gene ERCC-1: cDNA cloning and amino acid homology with the yeast DNA repair gene RAD10. Cell. 1986;44:913–23. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90014-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.van Duin M, Koken MH, van den Tol J, et al. Genomic characterization of the human DNA excision repair gene ERCC-1. Nucleic acids research. 1987;15:9195–213. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.22.9195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hoeijmakers JH, Egly JM, Vermeulen W. TFIIH: a key component in multiple DNA transactions. Current opinion in genetics & development. 1996;6:26–33. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(96)90006-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sung P, Bailly V, Weber C, Thompson LH, Prakash L, Prakash S. Human xeroderma pigmentosum group D gene encodes a DNA helicase. Nature. 1993;365:852–5. doi: 10.1038/365852a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Booton R, Ward T, Heighway J, et al. Xeroderma pigmentosum group D haplotype predicts for response, survival, and toxicity after platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer. 2006;106:2421–7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Su D, Ma S, Liu P, et al. Genetic polymorphisms and treatment response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Reed E. Platinum-DNA adduct, nucleotide excision repair and platinum based anti-cancer chemotherapy. Cancer treatment reviews. 1998;24:331–44. doi: 10.1016/s0305-7372(98)90056-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Reed E. Nucleotide excision repair and anti-cancer chemotherapy. Cytotechnology. 1998;27:187–201. doi: 10.1023/A:1008016922425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lunn RM, Helzlsouer KJ, Parshad R, et al. XPD polymorphisms: effects on DNA repair proficiency. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:551–5. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.4.551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bellmunt J, Paz-Ares L, Cuello M, et al. Gene expression of ERCC1 as a novel prognostic marker in advanced bladder cancer patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:522–8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Park DJ, Zhang W, Stoehlmacher J, et al. ERCC1 gene polymorphism as a predictor for clinical outcome in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2003;1:162–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kang S, Ju W, Kim JW, et al. Association between excision repair cross-complementation group 1 polymorphism and clinical outcome of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Experimental & molecular medicine. 2006;38:320–4. doi: 10.1038/emm.2006.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sakano S, Wada T, Matsumoto H, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA repair genes might be prognostic factors in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. British journal of cancer. 2006;95:561–70. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Park DJ, Stoehlmacher J, Zhang W, Tsao-Wei DD, Groshen S, Lenz HJ. A Xeroderma pigmentosum group D gene polymorphism predicts clinical outcome to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer research. 2001;61:8654–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kaina B, Christmann M. DNA repair in resistance to alkylating anticancer drugs. International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2002;40:354–67. doi: 10.5414/cpp40354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ladiges WC. Mouse models of XRCC1 DNA repair polymorphisms and cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25:1612–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.El-Khamisy SF, Masutani M, Suzuki H, Caldecott KW. A requirement for PARP1 for the assembly or stability of XRCC1 nuclear foci at sites of oxidative DNA damage. Nucleic acids research. 2003;31:5526–33. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Myers CE, McGuire WP, Liss RH, Ifrim I, Grotzinger K, Young RC. Adriamycin: the role of lipid peroxidation in cardiac toxicity and tumor response. Science. 1977;197:165–7. doi: 10.1126/science.877547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Perez E, Muss HB. Oncology. Vol. 19. Williston Park, NY: 2005. Optimizing adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer; pp. 1759–67. discussion 68, 72–4, 77–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hotta K, Matsuo K, Kiura K, Ueoka H, Tanimoto M. Advances in our understanding of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer. Current opinion in oncology. 2006;18:144–50. doi: 10.1097/01.cco.0000208787.91947.a2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Goldberg RM. Therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. The oncologist. 2006;11:981–7. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-9-981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Alexander D, Chatla C, Funkhouser E, Meleth S, Grizzle WE, Manne U. Postsurgical disparity in survival between African Americans and Caucasians with colonic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2004;101:66–76. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vinson RK, Hales BF. Expression of base excision, mismatch, and recombination repair genes in the organogenesis-stage rat conceptus and effects of exposure to a genotoxic teratogen, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide. Teratology. 2001;64:283–91. doi: 10.1002/tera.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hoeijmakers JH. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature. 2001;411:366–74. doi: 10.1038/35077232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yu JJ, Mu C, Lee KB, et al. A nucleotide polymorphism in ERCC1 in human ovarian cancer cell lines and tumor tissues. Mutation research. 1997;382:13–20. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5726(97)00004-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Viguier J, Boige V, Miquel C, et al. ERCC1 codon 118 polymorphism is a predictive factor for the tumor response to oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11:6212–7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhou W, Liu G, Park S, et al. Gene-smoking interaction associations for the ERCC1 polymorphisms in the risk of lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:491–6. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Spitz MR, Wu X, Wang Y, et al. Modulation of nucleotide excision repair capacity by XPD polymorphisms in lung cancer patients. Cancer research. 2001;61:1354–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Allan JM, Smith AG, Wheatley K, et al. Genetic variation in XPD predicts treatment outcome and risk of acute myeloid leukemia following chemotherapy. Blood. 2004;104:3872–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yin J, Vogel U, Ma Y, Guo L, Wang H, Qi R. Polymorphism of the DNA repair gene ERCC2 Lys751Gln and risk of lung cancer in a northeastern Chinese population. Cancer genetics and cytogenetics. 2006;169:27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2006.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.King CR, Yu J, Freimuth RR, McLeod HL, Marsh S. Interethnic variability of ERCC2 polymorphisms. The pharmacogenomics journal. 2005;5:54–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chung HH, Kim MK, Kim JW, et al. XRCC1 R399Q polymorphism is associated with response to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in bulky cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gurubhagavatula S, Liu G, Park S, et al. XPD and XRCC1 genetic polymorphisms are prognostic factors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2594–601. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Quintela-Fandino M, Hitt R, Medina PP, et al. DNA-repair gene polymorphisms predict favorable clinical outcome among patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4333–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.8768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Duell EJ, Holly EA, Bracci PM, Wiencke JK, Kelsey KT. A population-based study of the Arg399Gln polymorphism in X-ray repair cross- complementing group 1 (XRCC1) and risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer research. 2002;62:4630–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Duell EJ, Millikan RC, Pittman GS, et al. Polymorphisms in the DNA repair gene XRCC1 and breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:217–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang ZH, Miao XP, Tan W, Zhang XR, Xu BH, Lin DX. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in XRCC1 and clinical response to platin-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Ai zheng = Aizheng = Chinese journal of cancer. 2004;23:865–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang XG, Wang ZQ, Tong WM, Shen Y. PARP1 Val762Ala polymorphism reduces enzymatic activity. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2007;354:122–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lockett KL, Hall MC, Xu J, et al. The ADPRT V762A genetic variant contributes to prostate cancer susceptibility and deficient enzyme function. Cancer research. 2004;64:6344–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hao B, Wang H, Zhou K, et al. Identification of genetic variants in base excision repair pathway and their associations with risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer research. 2004;64:4378–84. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhang X, Miao X, Liang G, et al. Polymorphisms in DNA base excision repair genes ADPRT and XRCC1 and risk of lung cancer. Cancer research. 2005;65:722–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Boyer-Chammard A, Taylor TH, Anton-Culver H. Survival differences in breast cancer among racial/ethnic groups: a population-based study. Cancer Detect Prev. 1999;23:463–73. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1500.1999.99049.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shen Y, Dong W, Esteva FJ, Kau SW, Theriault RL, Bevers TB. Are there racial differences in breast cancer treatments and clinical outcomes for women treated at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;102:347–56. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9337-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dignam JJ. Efficacy of systemic adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in African-American and Caucasian women. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001:36–43. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Thatai LC, Banerjee M, Lai Z, Vaishampayan U. Racial disparity in clinical course and outcome of metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer. Urology. 2004;64:738–43. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Robbins AS, Yin D, Parikh-Patel A. Differences in prognostic factors and survival among White men and Black men with prostate cancer, California, 1995–2004. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:71–8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gadgeel SM, Kalemkerian GP. Racial differences in lung cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2003;22:39–46. doi: 10.1023/a:1022207917249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dignam JJ, Ye Y, Colangelo L, et al. Prognosis after rectal cancer in blacks and whites participating in adjuvant therapy randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:413–20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Mayberry RM, Coates RJ, Hill HA, et al. Determinants of black/white differences in colon cancer survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1686–93. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.22.1686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]