Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2013 Jan 10;64(4):949–961. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers375

Proteomic analysis of chromoplasts from six crop species reveals insights into chromoplast function and development

Yong-Qiang Wang 1,*, Yong Yang 2,*, Zhangjun Fei 2,3, Hui Yuan 1, Tara Fish 2, Theodore W Thannhauser 2, Michael Mazourek 1, Leon V Kochian 2, Xiaowu Wang 4, Li Li 1,2,
PMCID: PMC3580812  PMID: 23314817

Abstract

Chromoplasts are unique plastids that accumulate massive amounts of carotenoids. To gain a general and comparative characterization of chromoplast proteins, this study performed proteomic analysis of chromoplasts from six carotenoid-rich crops: watermelon, tomato, carrot, orange cauliflower, red papaya, and red bell pepper. Stromal and membrane proteins of chromoplasts were separated by 1D gel electrophoresis and analysed using nLC-MS/MS. A total of 953–2262 proteins from chromoplasts of different crop species were identified. Approximately 60% of the identified proteins were predicted to be plastid localized. Functional classification using MapMan bins revealed large numbers of proteins involved in protein metabolism, transport, amino acid metabolism, lipid metabolism, and redox in chromoplasts from all six species. Seventeen core carotenoid metabolic enzymes were identified. Phytoene synthase, phytoene desaturase, ζ-carotene desaturase, 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, and carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 1 were found in almost all crops, suggesting relative abundance of them among the carotenoid pathway enzymes. Chromoplasts from different crops contained abundant amounts of ATP synthase and adenine nucleotide translocator, which indicates an important role of ATP production and transport in chromoplast development. Distinctive abundant proteins were observed in chromoplast from different crops, including capsanthin/capsorubin synthase and fibrillins in pepper, superoxide dismutase in watermelon, carrot, and cauliflower, and glutathione-S-transferease in papaya. The comparative analysis of chromoplast proteins among six crop species offers new insights into the general metabolism and function of chromoplasts as well as the uniqueness of chromoplasts in specific crop species. This work provides reference datasets for future experimental study of chromoplast biogenesis, development, and regulation in plants.

Key words: Carrot, cauliflower, chromoplast, papaya, pepper, proteomics, tomato, watermelon

Introduction

Flowering plants contain many types of plastids, such as chloroplasts in green tissues, chromoplasts in pigmented flowers, fruits, and roots, amyloplasts in storage tissues of seeds, tubers, and stems, and etioplasts in tissues grown in dark. These plastids fulfil various distinctive and essential functions for plant growth and development. They serve as the main sites for photosynthesis and/or many important primary and secondary metabolism, including the synthesis of starch, fatty acids, amino acids, and secondary metabolites. Plastid genomes of flowering plants encode approximately 100 proteins, and most plastid proteins are nuclear-encoded. The predicted proteome size for all plastid types ranges from 2000 to 3500 proteins (van Wijk and Baginsky, 2011). Studies on chloroplasts have long been the primary focus and chloroplast proteomic analysis has been extensively carried out (van Wijk and Baginsky, 2011). In contrast, relatively few proteomic studies on other types of plastids have been reported.

Chromoplasts are unique plastids that accumulate carotenoids, bringing vivid red, orange, and yellow colour to many flowers, fruits, and vegetables. Chromoplasts are frequently derived from fully developed chloroplasts as seen during fruit ripening from green to red fruits in tomato and pepper. In many cases, chromoplasts also arise from non-coloured plastids, such as those in carrot, sweet potato, and watermelon. Chromoplasts vary in the morphology of carotenoid-accumulating substructures and can be classified as globular, crystalline, membranous, fibrillar, and tubular (Egea et al., 2010). Because chromoplasts accumulate carotenoids and other metabolites that are essential for nutritional and sensory quality of agricultural products, several proteomic studies on chromoplasts of fruits have been carried out, which identify 493 proteins from sweet orange (Citrus sinensis), 151 proteins from red bell pepper (Capsicum annuum), and 988 proteins from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) (Siddique et al., 2006; Barsan et al., 2010; Zeng et al., 2011). Proteomic analysis of the chloroplast to chromoplast transition in tomato identifies 1937 proteins (Barsan et al., 2012). Analysis of chromoplast proteins from these fruits shows a range of metabolic processes in chromoplasts. The relative abundances of the identified chromoplast proteins differ considerably in comparison with the chloroplast proteome, showing chromoplast-specific metabolic processes (Siddique et al., 2006; Barsan et al., 2010). Furthermore, as chromoplasts from different fruits are derived either from chloroplasts or other non-coloured plastids and possess specific carotenoid-accumulating substructures, it is expected of unique features for chromoplast proteomes from different crop species.

Proteomics is a powerful approach for comprehensive characterization of plastids. To gain a general and comparative characterization of chromoplast proteomes, this study performed proteomic analysis of chromoplasts from six crop species: watermelon, tomato, carrot, orange curd cauliflower, red papaya, and red bell pepper (Fig. 1A). To facilitate the identification of relatively abundant proteins, chromoplasts were subfractionated into stromal and membrane fractions and separated by one-dimensional SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis. Proteins in the visible bands were analysed using nano-liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (nLC-MS/MS). A substantially large numbers of chromoplast proteins were confidently identified. Relative abundance of the identified plastid proteins from each crop species were determined based on protein abundance index emPAI value (Ishihama et al., 2005). Comparative analysis of chromoplast proteomes among these six crops reveals some new insights into the general metabolism and function of chromoplasts as well as the uniqueness of specific chromoplasts.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Isolation of chromoplasts from six crop species. (A) Images of fruits and vegetables used for chromoplast isolation. (B) Chromoplasts were isolated by sucrose gradient centrifugation as described in Materials and Methods. Intact chromoplasts were collected from layers between 17/30% and 30/50% and washed extensively to remove contaminated proteins (this figure is available in colour at JXB online).

Materials and methods

Plant materials and carotenoid analysis

Fresh mature fruits of red watermelon (Citrullus lanatus subsp. vulgaris), red papaya (Carica papaya), red bell pepper (Capsicum annuum), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), as well as vegetables of carrot (Daucus carota subsp. sativus) and orange curd cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) (Fig. 1A) were either purchased from local supermarkets or grown in field at Cornell University according to standard production practice. Carotenoids from different fruits were extracted and analysed following the method as described (Li et al., 2012)

Chromoplast isolation and subfractionation

Chromoplasts from these six crop species were isolated using sucrose gradient essentially as described by Barsan et al. (2010) and Tetlow et al. (2003) with minor modifications. Briefly, approximately 250g fresh materials were ground in 600ml ice-cold extraction buffer containing 50mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 2mM EDTA, 330mM sorbitol, and 5mM 2-mercaptoethanol. Suspensions were filtered subsequently with four and eight layers of cheese cloth and centrifuged at 5000 g for 5min at 4 °C. The crude chromoplast pellets were gently suspended in 5ml extraction buffer containing 50% sucrose (w/v), overlaid with a discontinuous sucrose gradient (50, 30, 17%, w/v, in extraction buffer), and centrifuged at 62,000g for 45min at 4 °C. Intact chromoplasts between layers of 50/30% and 30/17% were carefully collected, washed three times with over 10-fold dilution in extraction buffer, and centrifuged at 5000 g for 5min to remove potential contaminations of cytosolic proteins and other organelles. The washed intact chromoplasts were stored at –70 °C until use.

To subfractionate chromoplasts, purified chromoplasts were suspended in 300 µl lysis buffer (25mM tricine, 1mM EDTA, pH8.0) and ruptured by three cycles of freezing (in liquid N2) and thawing (in 37 °C water bath). An aliquot (100 µl) was saved as total chromoplast samples. The rest was centrifuged at 200,000 g for 40min at 4 °C. Supernatant was carefully collected as stromal fraction. Pellet was washed twice in 1ml lysis buffer to remove stromal proteins, and suspended in 100 µl lysis buffer as membrane fraction. All the operations were carried out at 4 °C or on ice.

Protein separation and nLC-MS/MS analysis by Synapt HDMS

Proteins of three chromoplast fractions (total, stroma, and membrane) from each species were separated on gradient SDS polyacrylamided gels (T = 9–15%, C = 2.6%) (18cm wide and 17cm high) and visualized by staining with Colloidal Coomassie blue (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The visible gel bands from each lane were excised (Fig. 2). Subsequent in-gel digestion and peptide extraction were carried out as detailed previously (Yang et al., 2007).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

One-dimensional SDS-PAGE gels of chromoplast proteins from various fruits and vegetables. M, membrane fraction; S, stromal fraction; T, total chromoplast (this figure is available in colour at JXB online).

Tryptic peptide samples were analysed with a nanoACQUITY UPLC system coupled to a Synapt HDMS (Waters) equipped with a NanoLockSpray source as described previously (Yang et al., 2011). Briefly, each reconstituted sample was injected onto a Symmetry C18 trapping column and separated on a BEH C18 RP column. The eluted peptides were detected by Synapt HDMS through a nano ion source (NewObjective, Woburn, MA, USA). The instrument was operated in data-dependent acquisition (DDA) mode. For each DDA cycle, five highest intensity ions exhibiting multiple charge states (2+, 3+ and 4+) were selected for MS/MS. The spectral acquisition time in each MS and MS/MS scan was 1s with a 0.02 s interscan delay. The mass range was set to m/z 300–1400 for each MS survey scans, and at m/z 50–1800 for MS/MS scans. All data were acquired by MassLynx v4.1 (Waters). Proteomics analysis was repeated with two different biological replicates.

Data analysis

All of the raw MS and MS/MS data were output as PKL files using the ProteinLynx Global Server 2.4 (PLGS, Waters). The subsequent database searches were carried out by Mascot Daemon (version 2.3, Matrix Science, Boston, MA) against specified database of each crop species of watermelon (Guo et al., 2012), papaya (Ming et al., 2008), tomato (The Tomato Genome Consortium, 2012), and cauliflower whole-genome CDS generated by the Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China. The red bell pepper and carrot samples were searched against NCBInr/GreenPlants database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, downloaded on 28 February 2012). The default search settings used for the Mascot analysis were defined as described previously (Yang et al., 2011). To reduce the probability of false identification, only peptides with significance scores at the 99% confidence interval were counted as identified.

Protein annotation, plastid localization prediction, and functional classification

All the proteins identified from each band were combined. Functional annotation of unique proteins was obtained based on information from local Blast (NCBI BLAST+, version 2.2.25 search against GenBank Green Plants database (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). The functional description of individual protein was taken from the hit with lowest Expect value.

To predict the plastid localization of the identified proteins, a local Blast search was performed against Arabidopsis proteins (TAIR 10) and the proteins with lowest Expect value were chosen as Arabidopsis homologues. The corresponding AGI accession numbers were used to search against three databases. These databases included: gene models where their Gene Ontology (GO) terms were annotated as plastid localization in TAIR10 (www.arabidopsis.org); experimentally annotated plastid proteins from the PPDB database (http://ppdb.tc.cornell.edu); and proteins predicted to be plastid proteins by any program from SUBA database (http://suba.plantenergy.uwa.edu.au).

Protein functional classification and assignment were performed according to the bincodes of MapMan (http://mapman.gabipd.org/web/guest/mapman).

Results

Distinctive carotenoid profiles of various fruits and vegetables

Fruits of watermelon, tomato, papaya, red bell pepper, orange curd cauliflower, and carrot exhibit distinctive colours (Fig. 1A). HPLC analysis was carried out to determine the composition of carotenoids in the samples used in this study. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S1 (available at JXB online), watermelon and tomato accumulated predominantly lycopene in their fruits, which resulted in red colour. Carrot accumulated mainly β-carotene and α-carotene and cauliflower contained β-carotene. The accumulation of these carotenes was consistent with their orange colour of root or curd. Red-fleshed papaya accumulated several carotenoids with lycopene, β-carotene, and β-cryptoxanthin as the main components. Red bell pepper contained primarily capsanthin, which gave red fruit colour. Clearly, the distinctive colour of these fruits and vegetable owes their hues to the accumulation of those specific carotenoids.

Isolation of intact chromoplasts

A number of methods have been reported to isolate chromoplasts (Tetlow et al., 2003; Barsan et al., 2010; Zeng et al., 2011). Crude chromoplasts from various crops were isolated following the methods of Barsan et al. (2010) and purified with a discontinuous sucrose gradient according to Tetlow et al. (2003). Intact chromoplasts that were accumulated as sharp bands in the interfaces of 17/30% and 30/50% sucrose were carefully collected (Fig. 1B). The broken plastids were either floating on top of the sucrose gradient or in the bottom of the centrifuge tubes. To remove potential contamination of cytosolic proteins and other organelles, the isolated intact chromoplasts were washed extensively in large volumes of extraction buffer. The chromoplasts purified via the approach used has been shown to be essentially free of cytosolic and mitochondrial marker enzymes (Tetlow et al., 2003).

Overall proteomics analysis

The subfractionated chromoplast proteins from each crop species were separated on 1D SDS-PAGE gels (Fig. 2). Discrete and clearly visible bands from each chromoplast sample were cut out and analysed to provide a general survey of the chromoplast proteins and the relatively abundant proteins from different crop species. Up to 100 proteins with peptide significance scores at 99% confidence interval were identified from each gel band. Some proteins were detected in multiple gel bands as observed in other studies (Siddique et al., 2006). Analysis of stromal and membrane fractions identified a total of 1170 distinct proteins for watermelon, 953 proteins for tomato, 1891 proteins for carrot, 2262 proteins for cauliflower, 1581 proteins for papaya, and 1752 proteins for pepper (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1, available at JXB online).

Table 1.

Summary of identified chromoplast proteins from six crops species.

Watermelon Tomato Cauliflower Carrot Papaya Pepper
Identified proteins
Total 1170 953 2262 1891 1581 1752
Stroma 224 83 634 621 493 828
Membrane 797 783 1227 1137 777 650
Both 149 87 401 133 311 274
Predicted in plastid 719 (61.5) 588 (61.7) 1414 (62.5) 1252 (66.2) 896 (56.7) 1612 (92)
Identified proteins predicted in plastid
Stroma 143 66 419 459 297 772
Membrane 476 466 734 699 430 577
Both 100 56 261 94 169 263

Values are n or n (%).

By blasting against three databases (i.e. TAIR, PPDB, and SUBA), from 56.7% in papaya to 92% in pepper of the identified proteins were predicted to be plastid localized by at least one prediction program (Table 1). Except in pepper, predicted plastid proteins from the other crop species contained an approximately 60% of total identified proteins, consistent with a recent study of tomato plastid samples (Barsan et al., 2012). The final predicted plastid proteins ranged from 588 in tomato to 1612 in pepper (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1). Analysis of proteins from stromal and membrane fraction revealed that a fraction of the proteins were localized in both fractions. The numbers of dual localized proteins varied from 7% in carrot to 18% in cauliflower (Table 1).

Cellular processes shared among chromoplasts from various crop species

The identified plastid proteins from different crops were categorized into functional groups using MapMan. The distribution of protein abundance in most functional classes was found to be similar among various fruits and vegetables (Fig. 3). In general, apart from the group without an assigned function, the functional group associated with protein metabolism and process represented the most abundant group of proteins. Proteins associated with photosynthesis and carbon metabolism, electron transport/ATP synthesis, lipid metabolism, amino acid metabolism, stress and redox, signalling, and transport were also present in relatively high abundance.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Functional category of plastidial proteins identified from six crop species according to MapManhttp://mapman.gabipd.org/web/guest/mapman.

Proteins involved in photosynthesis were detected in chromoplasts from all six crop species (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table S1). A number of Calvin cycle proteins (i.e. chaperonin 60α, phosphoglycerate kinase, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, and transketolase) were consistently detected in chromoplasts from five to all six species (Supplementary Table S2). The persistence of Calvin cycle as well as oxidative pentose phosphate pathway proteins (i.e. transketolase) may provide intermediates for glycolysis and a main source of reducing power for various processes, respectively, in chromoplasts. Glycolysis also occurs in plastids in plants (Plaxton, 1996). Several glycolysis enzymes including aldolase, phosphoglycerate kinase, enolase, pyruvate kinase, and triosephosphate isomerase were observed in chromoplasts from five or all species. The observation of many glycolysis enzymes suggests an active metabolism in chromoplasts to generate energy, reducing power, and precursors for the synthesis of metabolites.

Fatty acids are synthesized in plastids. Noticeably, some enzymes for the synthesis of fatty acids as well as sulpholipids and glycolipids, such as NAD(P)-binding Rossmann-fold superfamily protein, thioesterase superfamily protein, sulphogquinovosyl diacylglycerol, and FAD-dependent oxidoreductase were identified in chromoplasts from five or all crop species (Supplementary Table S2). The apparently universal existence of these proteins suggests the ability of the chromoplasts in synthesizing fatty acids and also forming various types of lipids, probably associated with the intense vesicular activity during chromoplast development as proposed by Barsan et al. (2010). Furthermore, key enzymes involved in lipid catabolism and essential for lipid homeostasis, such as AMP-dependent synthetase and ligase, long-chain fatty acid acyl-CoA synthetase, phospholipase Dα1, and multifunctional protein 2 were also repeatedly detected in chromoplasts from different crops. Dynamic activities of lipid metabolism appear to occur in chromoplasts.

Plastids are also the site for amino acid synthesis. Proteins involved in amino acid metabolism constituted one of the top three functional groups with most abundant numbers of proteins (Fig. 3). Many proteins in amino acid metabolism pathway were encountered, including oxidoreductase, methionine synthase, aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase, ketol-acid reductoisomerase, isopropylmalate dehydrogenase 2, and 3-dehydroquinate synthase in chromoplasts from all six crop species (Supplementary Table S2). These results were consistent with other reports (Siddique et al., 2006; Barsan et al., 2010; Zeng et al., 2011). The persistent detection of these enzymes involved in the formation of an early branch point from aspartate and in the biosynthesis of branched-chain amino acids, aromatic amino acids, and methionine suggests their active synthesis within chromoplasts.

Redox systems are involved in the control of gene expression, protein import, enzyme activities, and repair mechanisms in plastids (Balsera et al., 2010). Many key components in maintaining cell redox homeostasis were found in chromoplast proteomes from five or all six crop species (Supplementary Table S2). They include thylakoidal ascorbate peroxidase, momodehydroascorbate reductase, glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase, 2-cysteine peroxiredoxin B, and superoxide dismutase as shown in the chloroplast thylakoid proteome (Friso et al., 2004). Further, a ubiquitous redox enzyme PDI-like that catalyses dithiol-disulphide exchange reactions as well as enzymes involved in ascorbate biosynthesis (l-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase) and glutathione biosynthesis (glutamate-cysteine ligase) were repeatedly identified. The persistent detection of a large number of proteins in the redox systems was consistent with previous studies (Barsan et al., 2010; Zeng et al., 2011), suggesting an important role of redox during chromoplast development.

Translocation of proteins into plastids is of importance for chromoplast biogenesis (Egea et al., 2010). Consistent with detection of chaperone proteins which drive protein import into plastids, a number of translocons including Toc75 and Tic110 in the protein import machinery, were identified in chromoplast proteomes from nearly all crop species (Supplementary Table S2). Toc75 forms the main protein translocation channel of the Toc complex and is an abundant protein in the outer envelope membrane (Eckart et al., 2002). Tic110 plays a general role in protein import as a common component of the Tic complex (Inaba et al., 2005). These two proteins likely constitute an important part of the protein import machinery in chromoplasts. Additionally, proteins involved in protein synthesis and degradation such as ribosomal proteins, GTP binding elongation factor Tu family protein, peptidase, aspartic proteinase, Clp proteases, and FtsH proteases were also persistently present. Proteins associated with protein translocation, synthesis, and degradation represent the most abundant functional group and constitute 14–20% of total plastid proteins, indicating active protein metabolism within chromoplasts.

Chromoplasts harbour a wide range of metabolic processes. Transportation of energy and various intermediates or substrates is essential for plastid development. A large number of transport proteins including V-ATPase, adenine nucleotide translocator, ABC transporter, glucose-6-phosphate/phosphate translocator, substrate carrier family protein, and S-adenosylmethionine carrier protein were persistently identified in chromoplast proteomes from nearly all crop species (Supplementary Table S2). The plastidial adenine nucleotide translocator catalyses the uptake of ATP, which affects energy-dependent metabolic processes and protein import in plastids (Neuhaus et al., 1997). Glucose-6-phosphate/phosphate translocator mediates the import of carbon, which provides the substrate for the generation of reducing power and metabolite biosynthesis in non-green plastids (Flugge et al., 2011). The detection of a range of transporters implies their importance in interconverting energy and transporting various substrates for energy and metabolite metabolism in chromoplasts.

Proteins involved in carotenoid biosynthesis and accumulation

There are over 20 core enzymes involved in carotenoid metabolism from the 2-C-methyl-d-erythritol-4-phosphate (MEP) pathway to carotenoid biosynthesis and degradation pathway (Fig. 4). Proteomic analysis of chromoplast proteins from various crop species identified 17 enzymes in the pathway. While ζ-carotene desaturase (ZDS) was detected in chromoplast proteomes from all crop species, a number of other enzymes, including 4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-en-1-yl diphosphate synthase (HDS), phytoene synthase (PSY), phytoene desaturase (PDS), 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED), and carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 1 (CCD1), were identified in most crops (Fig. 4). In contrast, enzymes catalysing α- and β-carotene to xanthophyll biosynthesis were not detected in most of crops except pepper. Four core enzyme proteins (i.e. LCY-e, CYP97A, CRY97C, and NXS) were not identified in any crops (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Simplified scheme of carotenoid biosynthetic pathway. The enzymes identified in the chromoplast proteomes are boxed. The crop species representing by numbers that contain the particular carotenoid pathway proteins are aligned next to the enzymes in the pathway: 1, watermelon; 2, tomato; 3, carrot; 4, cauliflower; 5, papaya; 6, pepper. ABA, abscisic acid; CCD, carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase; CCS, capsanthin/capsorubin synthase; CMK, 4-(cytidine 5’-diphospho)-2-C-methyl-d-erythritol kinase; CrtISO, ζ-carotene isomerase/carotenoid isomerase; CYP97A, β-carotene hydroxylase (P450); CYP97C, ε-carotene hydroxylase (P450); DXR, 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate reductase; DXS, 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase; GGPPS, geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase; HDR, 4-hydroxy-3-methylbut-2-enyl diphosphate reductase; HDS, hydroxymethylbutenyl diphosphate synthase; HYD, β-carotene hydroxylase gene; IDI, isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase; LCY-b, lycopene β-cyclase; LCY-e, lycopene ε-cyclase; MCT, 2-C-methyl-d-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransferase; MDS, 2-C-methyl-d-erythritol-2,4-cyclodiphosphate synthase; NCED, 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase; PDS, phytoene desaturase; PSY, phytoene synthase; VDE, violaxanthin de-epoxidase; ZDS, ζ-carotene desaturase; ZEP, zeaxanthin epoxidase; Z-ISO, ζ-carotene isomerase.

Carotenoids are sequestered in carotenoid-lipoprotein substructures, which are composed of carotenoids, lipids, and proteins (Li and Van Eck, 2007). Fibrillin is known to be the main component of carotenoid lipoprotein sequestration structures in pepper and contributes to high levels of carotenoid accumulation (Deruere et al., 1994). Fibrillin and fibrillin homologues were also identified in the chromoplast of various crops (Table S1). Further, a number of plastid-lipid-associated proteins were also detected. They likely contribute to carotenoid accumulation in various types of chromoplasts.

Abundant proteins are detected in chromoplasts of various crops

Although chromoplasts from different crop species share extensively similar metabolic processes for chromoplast development and pigment accumulation, distinctive protein distribution patterns on SDS-PAGE gels were observed for chromoplast proteins (Fig. 2). A number of intensely staining gel bands in stromal and membrane fractions of chromoplasts from each crop species showed up. The protein abundance in each crop species and in each individual band was determined based on emPAI (Ishihama et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2007). Some of the abundant proteins identified from the major gel bands of each species are listed in Table 2, which includes both predicted plastid and non-plastid proteins.

Table 2.

Most abundant proteins identified from chromoplast samples of each crop species.

Description Protein accession emPAI Band no. Amount in gel band (%) Fraction Plastid-protein
Watermelon
Formate dehydrogenase Cla017090 10.25 6 26.8 S Yes
Manganese superoxide dismutase Cla008101 10.11 10 39.1 S Yes
Cpn20 Cla011138 5.6 10 21.7 S Yes
V-ATPase subunit A Cla015485 8.85 16 29.5 M Yes
Mitochondrial processing peptidase Cla016811 5.16 18 13.5 M Yes
ATP synthase beta subunit Cla003906 6.22 19 28.8* M Yes
V-ATPase subunit C Cla009088 7.67 21 10.5 M Yes
Adenine nucleotide translocator Cla022585 10.04 28 30.9* M Yes
Putative ADP, ATP carrier Cla002230 3.37 28 8.9 M Yes
Annexin Cla009947 122.87 7, 26 73.0, 55.2 SM No
Annexin-like protein Cla009948 82.17 8, 27 56.3, 41.2 SM No
Universal stress protein Cla017941 16.71 32 33.8 M No
HSP15.9 Cla009144 38.62 33 46.5 M No
Histone H4 Cla005035 12.91 34 17.3 M No
Tomato
2-Isopropylmalate synthase Solyc08g014130.2.1 2.83 12 31.77 S Yes
V-ATPase subunit B Solyc01g111760.2.1 4.36 15, 49 19.21, 14.55 SM Yes
ATP synthase subunit beta chloroplastic Solyc01g007320.2.1 6.44 15, 50 23.68, 21.74 SM Yes
Alcohol dehydrogenase-2 Solyc06g059740.2.1 2.94 17 24.05 S Yes
V-ATPase A1 subunit Solyc12g055800.1.1 11.55 44 57.51 M Yes
Mitochondrial processing peptidase Solyc12g008630.1.1 3.32 48 13.83 M Yes
ATP synthase beta subunit Solyc04g007550.2.1 3.72 50 10.36 M Yes
V-ATPase subunit C Solyc03g097790.2.1 5.16 54 26.04 M Yes
ADP, ATP carrier protein Solyc07g053830.2.1 4 58 5.71 M Yes
Adenine nucleotide translocator Solyc11g062130.1.1 3.9 59 9.66 M Yes
Short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase Solyc07g047800.2.1 6.09 60 10.32 M Yes
NADH dehydrogenase Solyc01g109620.2.1 3.19 61 9.32 M Yes
Small heat shock protein Solyc05g014280.2.1 2.82 63 7.5 M Yes
ADP-ribosylation factor Solyc01g008000.2.1 5.97 65 13.66 M Yes
Lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 Solyc04g054980.2.1 5.96 66 12.33 M Yes
Lipoxygenase Solyc01g099190.2.1 2.88 3, 40 56.8, 18.2 SM No
Lipoxygenase Solyc08g014000.2.1 3.48 41 35.48 M No
Late embryogenesis (Lea)-like protein Solyc01g095150.2.1 4.08 63 12.45 M No
Stress responsive protein Solyc01g010750.2.1 5.67 52 16.45 M No
Histone H4 Solyc04g011390.1.1 86.87 68 60.36 M No
Cauliflower
Malate dehydrogenase Bol039124 17.36 13 49.2* S Yes
Mn superoxide dismutase Bol005872 54.92 46 45.9 S Yes
V-ATPase subunit A Bol040479 13.68 20 28* M Yes
Mitochondrial processing peptidase Bol002182 8.31 23 16.8 M Yes
ATP synthase beta subunit Bol008794 17.87 24 34.5 M Yes
ATP synthase subunit gamma Bol008180 6.5 31 13.6 M Yes
Adenosine nucleotide translocator Bol004271 10.9 33 20.5 M Yes
ATP synthase delta subnuit Bol034235 33.94 35 24.5 M Yes
60S acidic ribosomal protein P2-2 Bol026417 27.63 41 27.5 M Yes
Succinyl-CoA ligase beta subunit Bol038744 7.25 12 16.9 S No
Histone H4 Bol005544 310.28 45 83.7 M No
Carrot
ATP synthase beta subunit gi|343410685 14.16 10, 40, 41 12.5*, 85.3*, 52.8* SM Yes
Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase gi|76150398 3 27 18.9 S Yes
V-ATPase catalytic subunit A gi|137460 7.94 35 34.8 M Yes
Adenine nucleotide translocator gi|307135850 4.21 55, 56, 57 40.3*, 30*, 10.4* M Yes
NADH dehydrogenase gi|1171866 2.71 65 11.2 M Yes
F1-ATPase alpha subunit gi|34539285 3.46 41 29.2* M No
Chain A Calmodulin Isoform 1 gi|178847272 7.94 66 27.3 M No
Calmodulin gi|16225 6.21 66 20.6 M No
Papaya
Methionine synthase evm.TU.supercontig_161.10 7.1 5, 36 39.9, 18.7 SM Yes
Formate dehydrogenase evm.TU.supercontig_39.83 13.21 18 28.3 S Yes
Glutathione S-transferase evm.TU.supercontig_50.117 20.18 23 41.3 S Yes
Glutathione S-transferase evm.TU.supercontig_77.114 58.81 24 65.3 S Yes
Cyclophilin evm.TU.supercontig_37.181 10.12 29 17.7 S Yes
V-ATP subunit A evm.TU.supercontig_155.13 20.58 39 51.8 M Yes
ATP synthase beta subunit 1 evm.TU.supercontig_65.97 16.05 46 46.6 M Yes
Adenine nucleotide translocator evm.TU.supercontig_883.3 8.78 57 17.5 M Yes
Putative ADP, ATP carrier evm.TU.supercontig_83.67 3.37 57 6.2 M Yes
Phospholipase C evm.TU.supercontig_37.169 13.08 53 26.8 M No
Annexin evm.TU.supercontig_4842.1 6.16 55 18.2 M No
Universal stress protein evm.TU.supercontig_56.52 24.3 66 43.2 M No
Pathogenesis-related protein 4 evm.TU.supercontig_1476.3 9.86 68 15.2 M No
Pepper
ATP-dependent Clp protease gi|399213 5.63 6, 40 25.3, 29.2 SM Yes
Transketolase 1 gi|3559814 7.4 7, 43 32.3, 24.8 SM Yes
Ketol-acid reductoisomerase gi|193290660 7.39 11 48.8 S Yes
4-Methyl-5(b-hydroxyethyl)-thiazol monophosphate biosynthesis enzyme gi|171854671 5.76 20 27.7 S Yes
Fibrillin gi|460761 7.68 23, 52 47.9, 26.7 SM Yes
2-C-Methyl-erythritol 2, 4-cyclodiphosphate synthase gi|157042737 11.48 33 34.6 S Yes
FtsH-like protein gi|37538489 5.17 44 23.9* M Yes
ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease FTSH gi|2492515 6.99 44 16.2 M Yes
zeta-Carotene desaturase gi|17367814 4.14 46 28.2* M Yes
ATP synthase subunit beta gi|60391817 8.12 48 39.3* M Yes
Capsanthin/capsorubin synthase gi|12643508 43.09 49 95.6 M Yes
Histone H4 gi|462243 50.9 92 70.2 M No

* The percentage of homologous proteins identified in the same gel band was grouped as a single family protein. M, membrane fraction of chromoplasts; S, stromal fraction.

In watermelon, the relatively most abundant proteins included formate dehydrogenase, Mn superoxide dismutase, Cpn20, ATP synthase, adenine nucleotide translocator, V-ATPase, and mitochondrial processing peptidase. In addition, a number of predicted non-plastidial proteins, such as annexins, were found at high abundance in watermelon chromoplast samples. The plastid formate dehydrogenase has been suggested to provide a ready source of high energy electrons to facilitate reduction reactions (Herman et al., 2002). Mn superoxide dismutase functions in maintenance of redox homeostasis. Cpn20 is a small molecular chaperone and important in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis (Koumoto et al., 1999). V-ATPase is found spanning the membranes of many organelles, which couples the energy of ATP hydrolysis to transport protons across membranes and acts an important regulator of membrane trafficking (Schumacher and Krebs, 2010). ATP synthase produces energy and transports protons. Adenine nucleotide translocator is also known as ADP, ATP translocator and mediates ADP and ATP exchange, including the import of ATP in non-green plastids (Flugge et al., 2011). The high abundance of these proteins involved in energy metabolism and transport as well as in maintaining redox homeostasis implies their roles in watermelon chromoplast development.

In tomato, some of the most abundant proteins included V-ATPase, ATP synthase, adenine nucleotide translocator, ADP-ribosylation factor, small heat shock protein, alcohol dehydrogenases, and lipoxygenase homology domain-containing protein 1 (Table 2). These protein localization predictions were consistent with those from a recent study of plastid development in tomato (Barsan et al., 2012). A number of predicted non-plastidial proteins including histone H4 were found to be present at high abundance in tomato chromoplast samples. Like the case for watermelon, the proteins involved in energy production and transport (i.e. ATP synthase and ADP/ATP translocator) as well as those involved in the production of reducing power (i.e. alcohol dehydrogenases) were among the most abundant proteins. Vesicle fusion is important for chromoplast membrane formation (Hugueney et al., 1995). ADP-ribosylation factor, a small GTP-binding protein functioning as regulator of vesicular traffic (Memon, 2004), was identified to be abundant, indicating potentially active membrane proliferation in tomato chromoplasts. Lipoxygenases play an important role in the generation of fatty acid-derived flavour compounds (Chen et al., 2004). The presence of high abundance of lipoxygenases may contribute to the production of a large number of flavour compounds during tomato fruit ripening.

Carrot is one of the richest sources for carotenes and develops chromoplasts underground. Superoxide dismutase, ATP synthase, V-ATPase, adenine nucleotide translocator, and NADH dehydrogenase, along with non-plastidial calmodulins, were highly abundant in carrot chromoplast samples (Table 2). ATP synthase and adenine nucleotide translocator were present in highest abundance in the membrane fraction of carrot chromoplasts. The prevalence of these proteins indicates the high requirement of energy for carrot chromoplast development. The presence of abundant plastidic Cu-Zn superoxide dismutase (Huang et al., 2012) suggests the importance of maintenance of redox homeostasis in carrot chromoplasts.

Orange curd cauliflower results from a single gene (Or) mutation that changes the plastid type from leucoplasts to chromoplasts (Lu et al., 2006). Several proteins such as malate dehydrogenase, Mn superoxide dismutase, V-ATPase, ATP synthase, adenine nucleotide translocator, mitochondrial processing peptidase, and 60S acidic ribosomal protein P2-2 were found to be abundant in orange cauliflower chromoplast samples (Table 2). As in carrot, ATP synthase and ADP/ATP translocator were among the most abundant proteins. Proteins involved in maintaining the optimal ratio between ATP and reducing equivalents (i.e. malate dehydrogenase) (Berkemeyer et al., 1998), were also present at high abundance, implying the importance of energy metabolism in cauliflower chromoplast development. Noticeably, Mn superoxide dismutase was a highly abundant protein from cauliflower samples.

In papaya, proteins including methionine synthase, formate dehydrogenase, glutathione-S-transferases, V-ATP synthase, ATP synthase, and adenine nucleotide translocator were detected in high abundance. Methionine synthase is one of the most abundant transcripts in papaya and represents a highly abundant protein induced during ripening (Nogueira et al., 2012). As in the other crop proteomes, ATP synthase and adenine nucleotide translocator were among the most abundant proteins. Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) belong to a large and diverse group of enzymes in plants. Their localization in plastids has been suggested to play a role in maintaining ROS homeostasis (George et al., 2010). The presence of high abundance of GST implies active redox reaction within papaya chromoplasts.

In pepper, a number of proteins such as ATP-dependent Clp protease, transketolase 1, ketol-acid reductoisomerase, fibrillins, 2-C-methyl-d-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate synthase (MDS), FtsH-like pritein (pftf), capsanthin/capsorubin synthase (CCS), and ATP synthase were present at high abundance. Several of these abundant proteins are also identified in a previous chromoplast proteomics study in pepper (Siddique et al., 2006). CCS catalyses the formation of special pigments and represented the most abundant protein in pepper chromoplast proteome (Table 2). In addition, two other carotenogenic enzymes (i.e. MDS and ζ-carotene desaturase, ZDS) were found to be abundant. Fibrillin represented another most abundant protein. Plastid fusion and/or translocation factor (pfts), a protein involved in plastid membrane biogenesis and originally identified in red pepper (Hugueney et al., 1995) was also present at high abundance. Like other chromoplast proteomes, ATP synthase was among the most abundant protein.

Discussion

Chromoplasts from various crops share a similar distribution of functional classes of proteins

This study provides a large-scale proteomic and bioinformatic analyses of chromoplast proteins from six important crop species. Analysis of these six chromoplast proteomic data sets revealed that the proteins identified had a similar distribution of functional classes, similarly to a previous report (Barsan et al., 2010). A relatively large number of proteins involved in the functional groups including photosynthesis, glycolysis, electron transport/ATP synthesis, lipid metabolism, amino acid metabolism, secondary metabolism, redox, protein metabolism and targeting, signalling, and transport were identified, indicating important roles of these processes in chromoplast development.

The identification of photosynthetic proteins in chromoplasts derived either from chloroplasts or from non-coloured plastids suggests the potential role of maintaining photosynthetic machinery in chromoplasts. All the metabolic precursors used in heterotrophic plastids are either generated by oxidative metabolisms within the organelle or actively imported from the cytosol (Neuhaus and Emes, 2000). Concomitantly, a relatively large number of proteins involved in glycolysis to produce metabolic precursors contributed to the prevalent functional group of chromoplast proteins. In addition, the essential biosynthetic activities in nonphotosynthetic plastids are sustained by the generation of ATP and reducing power (Flugge et al., 2011). A substantial numbers of proteins involved in energy and reducing power production were observed in these chromoplasts as shown in other studies (Barsan et al., 2010). Chromoplast development is associated with new membrane formation and the formation of lipid-protein carotenoid sequestration structures (Li and Van Eck, 2007). Thus, active lipid metabolism in chromoplasts is expected. Indeed, a recent metabolic study of tomato chromoplasts using radiolabelled precursors revealed that lipid biosynthesis is a very efficient process in chromoplasts (Angaman et al., 2012). Amino acids are synthesized in plastids. The detection of many proteins involved in amino acid biosynthesis from all crops confirmed the process within chromoplasts. Further, chromoplasts contain a highly active redox system. The large number of redox enzyme proteins may allow the plastid to acclimate various processes and signalling during chromoplast development (Egea et al., 2010). While no information is available in documenting protein import machinery in related to chromoplast development, the vast amount of evidence for its role in chloroplast biogenesis (Kessler and Schnell, 2009) suggests the importance of protein import in chromoplast development. Moreover, a relatively large number of proteins involved in signalling and cell metabolism were present in chromoplast proteins, which might play critical roles in the communication between chromoplasts and other organelles. As expected with the nature of heterotrophic plastids, the chromoplast proteomes from all crops contained abundant numbers of transport proteins to provide various substrates and energy supply to chromoplasts.

Early carotenoid biosynthetic and cleavage enzymes are persistently detected in various chromoplast proteomes

As the primary function of chromoplasts is the synthesis and accumulation of carotenoid pigments, carotenoid metabolism is the best-studied metabolic process in chromoplasts. Analysis of various chromoplast samples enabled the identification of many carotenogenic proteins (Fig. 4). A number of early carotenoid biosynthesis proteins prior to lycopene synthesis (i.e. HDS, PSY, PDS, and ZDS) were repeatedly identified from various crop species as shown in other studies (Barsan et al., 2010; Zeng et al., 2011). The detection of these early pathway enzyme proteins may suggest a generally relative abundance of them among the carotenogenic enzymes as well as their central role in directing metabolic flux into carotenoid metabolism. Further, there appears no general correlation between the specific carotenoids accumulated and the presence or absence of up- and downstream enzyme proteins, indicting a complicated regulation of specific carotenoid accumulation in various crops.

Carotenoid-derived metabolites, the apocarotenoids, contribute significantly to flavour and aroma of fruits. Volatile apocarotenoid synthesis increases dramatically during fruit ripening (Simkin et al., 2004; Ibdah et al., 2006). Consistently, CCD1 was detected in nearly all chromoplast samples from these crop samples. Similarly, the key enzyme in the ABA biosynthetic pathway, NCED, was also found from nearly all these species as shown in the Citrus chromoplast proteome (Zeng et al., 2011). The persistent presence of these catabolic enzyme proteins indicates an important role of them in carotenoid metabolism and ripening processes.

Chromoplasts contain high abundance of proteins involved in ATP production and transport

Chromoplasts as heterotrophic plastids require an extensive supply of ATP to energize various metabolic processes in plastids (Neuhaus and Emes, 2000; Egea et al., 2010; Flugge et al., 2011). Among the most abundant proteins identified from each chromoplast sample, ATP synthase and adenine nucleotide translocator were repeatedly observed. Noticeably, the protein gel bands associated with these two proteins represented the most intense bands in the membrane fraction of chromoplasts from all crop species except pepper, in which the strongest bands corresponded to CCS and fibrillin (Fig. 2). High abundance of ATP synthase was also reported in a proteomic study of tomato chromoplasts (Barsan et al., 2012). Although devoid of any photosynthetic activity, chromoplast ATP synthase from daffodil flower is demonstrated to be able to synthesis ATP via the energized chromoplast membrane through the NAD(P)H-dependent respiratory activity (Morstadt et al., 2002). A recent metabolic labelling study also shows an active ATP synthesis in tomato chromoplast (Angaman et al., 2012). Further, a high abundance of ATP synthase is also detected in other heterotrophic plastids, such as in proplastids (Brautigam and Weber, 2009). ATP synthase, which is found among 174 chloroplast phosphoproteins, can be regulated by phosphorylation in controlling its activity (Reiland et al., 2009). Adenine nucleotide translocator facilitates the transport of ATP or ADP across membranes and preferentially imports ATP into heterotrophic plastids, which determines the sink strength of plastids (Neuhaus and Emes, 2000; Flugge et al., 2011). An increased plastidic adenine nucleotide translocator activity has been shown to exert profound effects on lipid and starch synthesis in non-photosynthetic plastids (Tjaden et al., 1998; Reiser et al., 2004).

Membrane proliferation is an important process for chromoplast biogenesis and development (Li and van Eck, 2007). The existence of these two proteins in chromoplast samples could also provide substantial energy for membrane formation in chromoplasts. Active ATP synthesis and the presence of active translocators are known to be needed for massive membrane formation in daffodil flower chromoplasts (Morstadt et al., 2002). The high abundance of these two proteins may suggest the crucial roles of active ATP production and transport during chromoplast development, consistent with the observed elevated energy production components during chloroplast to chromoplast transition in tomato (Barsan et al., 2012).

Highly abundant specific proteins are accumulated in chromoplasts of various crop species

Chromoplasts from various crop species also contain high abundance of other specific proteins. Pepper chromoplasts synthesize the specific carotenoids, capsanthin, and capsorubin, which provide the typical colour of red pepper. Interestingly, while carotenogenic enzymes are generally present at low abundance in plants (Shumskaya et al., 2012), CCS, the enzyme responsible for capsanthin and capsorubin synthesis, represented the most abundant protein in pepper chromoplasts (Fig. 2). Fibrillins are the main structural components of the lipoprotein fibrils and their accumulation directly correlates with carotenoid accumulation in pepper chromoplasts (Deruere et al., 1994). Thus, it was not surprising to find that fibrillins are among the most abundant proteins in red bell pepper chromoplasts. Consistent with a previous study (Siddique et al., 2006), many carotenogenic enzyme proteins were detected abundantly in pepper chromoplasts (Fig. 4). The high abundance of carotenoid biosynthetic pathway enzymes and fibrillins suggests that pepper chromoplasts are characterized with predominant carotenoid biosynthesis and sequestration.

An intrinsic feature of chromoplasts is the presence of a highly active redox system. Watermelon, carrot, and cauliflower accumulated abundant superoxide dismutase. An upregulation of superoxide dismutase activity is observed during chromoplast development (Marti et al., 2009). The activation of plastid superoxide dismutase expression is found to depend on a copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase (Huang et al., 2012). Interestingly, papaya contained a high abundance of GST, which is also found to be a highly abundant protein induced during papaya fruit ripening (Nogueira et al., 2012). GST activity is observed in chloroplasts of Lycopersicon pennellii (Mittova et al., 2002). Its plastid localization is suggested to play an important role in maintenance of ROS homeostasis (George et al., 2010). Whether these redox enzymes contribute to the specific characteristics of these chromoplasts remains to be determined.

Some of the detected abundant proteins from various chromoplast samples were predicted to be non-plastidial proteins, which could be due to the tight association of them with chromoplasts or possible dual localization. Indeed, a spinach annexin was found to bind tightly to the outer surface of chloroplasts (Seigneurin-Berny et al., 2000). Approximately 50 plastid proteins have been identified to date as having dual localizations (Carrie et al., 2009). A recent study reveals that mitochondrial processing peptidase is targeted to both mitochondria and chloroplast (Baudisch and Klosgen, 2012). While the presence of these non-plastid proteins could be most likely due to contamination, the high abundance of them in chromoplast samples may exert effects on chromoplast development in specific plant species.

In conclusion, the chromoplast proteomic analysis from six crop species allowed this study to identify large sets of chromoplast proteins with a very good overview of the relatively abundant proteins. These data sets are excellent resources for categorizing chromoplast proteins. This study revealed common metabolic characteristics shared among chromoplasts of different crop species and showed some remarkable differences in relative abundance of some identified proteins among different chromoplasts. Future clarification of the functions and networking of chromoplast proteins will offer new insights into plastid function and contribute to a better understanding of chromoplast biogenesis and development.

Supplementary material

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Supplementary Fig. S1. Typical HPLC elution profile of carotenoids found in various fruits and vegetables used in this study.

Supplementary Table S1. List of identified proteins and their functional category from each crop species.

Supplementary Table S2. Plastid proteins detected in four or more crops.

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the USDA-ARS base fund. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture.

References

  1. Angaman DM, Petrizzo R, Hernandez-Gras F, Romero-Segura C, Pateraki I, Busquets M, Boronat A. 2012. Precursor uptake assays and metabolic analyses in isolated tomato fruit chromoplasts. Plant Methods 8, 1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balsera M, Soll J, Buchanan BB. 2010. Redox extends its regulatory reach to chloroplast protein import. Trends in Plant Science 15, 515–521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barsan C, Sanchez-Bel P, Rombaldi C, Egea I, Rossignol M, Kuntz M, Zouine M, Latche A, Bouzayen M, Pech JC. 2010. Characteristics of the tomato chromoplast revealed by proteomic analysis. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 2413–2431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barsan C, Zouine M, Maza E, et al. 2012. Proteomic analysis of chloroplast-to-chromoplast transition in tomato reveals metabolic shifts coupled with disrupted thylakoid biogenesis machinery and elevated energy-production components. Plant Physiology 160, 708–725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baudisch B, Klosgen RB. 2012. Dual targeting of a processing peptidase into both endosymbiotic organelles mediated by a transport signal of unusual architecture. Molecular Plant 5, 494–503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Berkemeyer M, Scheibe R, Ocheretina O. 1998. A novel, non-redox-regulated NAD-dependent malate dehydrogenase from chloroplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 27927–27933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brautigam A, Weber AP. 2009. Proteomic analysis of the proplastid envelope membrane provides novel insights into small molecule and protein transport across proplastid membranes. Molecular Plant 2, 1247–1261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carrie C, Giraud E, Whelan J. 2009. Protein transport in organelles: dual targeting of proteins to mitochondria and chloroplasts. FEBS Journal 276, 1187–1195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen G, Hackett R, Walker D, Taylor A, Lin Z, Grierson D. 2004. Identification of a specific isoform of tomato lipoxygenase (TomloxC) involved in the generation of fatty acid-derived flavor compounds. Plant Physiology 136, 2641–2651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deruere J, Romer S, d’Harlingue A, Backhaus RA, Kuntz M, Camara B. 1994. Fibril assembly and carotenoid overaccumulation in chromoplasts: a model for supramolecular lipoprotein structures. The Plant Cell 6, 119–133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eckart K, Eichacker L, Sohrt K, Schleiff E, Heins L, Soll J. 2002. A Toc75-like protein import channel is abundant in chloroplasts. EMBO Reports 3, 557–562 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Egea I, Barsan C, Bian W, Purgatto E, Latché A, Chervin C, Bouzayen M, Pech JC. 2010. Chromoplast differentiation: current status and perspectives. Plant and Cell Physiology 51, 1601–1611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Flugge UI, Hausler RE, Ludewig F, Gierth M. 2011. The role of transporters in supplying energy to plant plastids. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 2381–2392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Friso G, Giacomelli L, Ytterberg AJ, Peltier JB, Rudella A, Sun Q, Wijk KJ. 2004. In-depth analysis of the thylakoid membrane proteome of Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts: new proteins, new functions, and a plastid proteome database. The Plant Cell 16, 478–499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. George S, Venkataraman G, Parida A. 2010. A chloroplast-localized and auxin-induced glutathione S-transferase from phreatophyte Prosopis juliflora confer drought tolerance on tobacco. Journal of Plant Physiology 167, 311–318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guo S, Zhang J, Sun H, et al. 2012. The draft genome of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and resequencing of 20 diverse accessions. Nature GeneticsDOI: 10.1038/ng.2470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Herman PL, Ramberg H, Baack RD, Markwell J, Osterman JC. 2002. Formate dehydrogenase in Arabidopsis thaliana: overexpression and subcellular localization in leaves. Plant Science 163, 1137–1145 [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang CH, Kuo W-Y, Weiss C, Jinn TL. 2012. Copper chaperone-dependent and -independent activation of three copper-zinc superoxide dismutase homologs localized in different cellular compartments in Arabidopsis . Plant Physiology 158, 737–746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hugueney P, Bouvier F, Badillo A, d’Harlingue A, Kuntz M, Camara B. 1995. Identification of a plastid protein involved in vesicle fusion and/or membrane protein translocation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92, 5630–5634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ibdah M, Azulay Y, Portnoy V, et al. 2006. Functional characterization of CmCCD1, a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase from melon. Phytochemistry 67, 1579–1589 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Inaba T, Alvarez-Huerta M, Li M, Bauer J, Ewers C, Kessler F, Schnell DJ. 2005. Arabidopsis tic110 is essential for the assembly and function of the protein import machinery of plastids. The Plant Cell 17, 1482–1496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ishihama Y, Oda Y, Tabata T, Sato T, Nagasu T, Rappsilber J, Mann M. 2005. Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 4, 1265–1272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kessler F, Schnell D. 2009. Chloroplast biogenesis: diversity and regulation of the protein import apparatus. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 21, 494–500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Koumoto Y, Shimada T, Kondo M, Takao T, Shimonishi Y, Hara-Nishimura I, Nishimura M. 1999. Chloroplast Cpn20 forms a tetrameric structure in Arabidopsis thaliana . The Plant Journal 17, 467–477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li L, Van Eck J. 2007. Metabolic engineering of carotenoid accumulation by creating a metabolic sink. Transgenic Research 16, 581–585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li L, Yang Y, Xu Q, et al. 2012. The or gene enhances carotenoid accumulation and stability during post-harvest storage of potato tubers. Molecular Plant 5, 339–352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lu S, Van Eck J, Zhou X, et al. 2006. The cauliflower Or gene encodes a DnaJ cysteine-rich domain-containing protein that mediates high levels of beta-carotene accumulation. The Plant Cell 18, 3594–3605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Marti MC, Camejo D, Olmos E, Sandalio LM, Fernandez-Garcia N, Jimenez A, Sevilla F. 2009. Characterisation and changes in the antioxidant system of chloroplasts and chromoplasts isolated from green and mature pepper fruits. Plant Biology 11, 613–624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Memon AR. 2004. The role of ADP-ribosylation factor and SAR1 in vesicular trafficking in plants. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1664, 9–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ming R, Hou S, Feng Y, et al. 2008. The draft genome of the transgenic tropical fruit tree papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus). Nature 452, 991–996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mittova V, Tal M, Volokita M, Guy M. 2002. Salt stress induces up-regulation of an efficient chloroplast antioxidant system in the salt-tolerant wild tomato species lycopersicon pennellii but not in the cultivated species. Physiologia Plantarum 115, 393–400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Morstadt L, Graber P, De Pascalis L, Kleinig H, Speth V, Beyer P. 2002. Chemiosmotic ATP synthesis in photosynthetically inactive chromoplasts from Narcissus pseudonarcissus L. Linked to a redox pathway potentially also involved in carotene desaturation. Planta 215, 134–140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Neuhaus HE, Emes MJ. 2000. Nonphotosynthetic metabolism in plastids. Annual Review of Plant Biology 51, 111–140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Neuhaus HE, Thom E, Mohlmann T, Steup M, Kampfenkel K. 1997. Characterization of a novel eukaryotic ATP/ADP translocator located in the plastid envelope of Arabidopsis thaliana L. The Plant Journal 11, 73–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nogueira SB, Labate CA, Gozzo FC, Pilau EJ, Lajolo FM, Oliveira do Nascimento JR. 2012. Proteomic analysis of papaya fruit ripening using 2DE-DIGE. Journal of Proteomics 75, 1428–1439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Plaxton WC. 1996. The organization and regulation of plant glycolysis. Annual Review of Plant Biology 47, 185–214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reiland S, Messerli G, Baerenfaller K, Gerrits B, Endler A, Grossmann J, Gruissem W, Baginsky S. 2009. Large-scale Arabidopsis phosphoproteome profiling reveals novel chloroplast kinase substrates and phosphorylation networks. Plant Physiology 150, 889–903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Reiser J, Linka N, Lemke L, Jeblick W, Neuhaus HE. 2004. Molecular physiological analysis of the two plastidic ATP/ADP transporters from Arabidopsis . Plant Physiology 136, 3524–3536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Schumacher K, Krebs M. 2010. The V-ATPase: small cargo, large effects. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13, 724–730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Seigneurin-Berny D, Rolland N, Dorne AJ, Joyard J. 2000. Sulfolipid is a potential candidate for annexin binding to the outer surface of chloroplast. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 272, 519–524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shumskaya M, Bradbury LM, Monaco RR, Wurtzel ET. 2012. Plastid localization of the key carotenoid enzyme phytoene synthase is altered by isozyme, allelic variation, and activity. The Plant Cell 24, 3725–3741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Siddique MA, Grossmann J, Gruissem W, Baginsky S. 2006. Proteome analysis of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) chromoplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology 47, 1663–1673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Simkin AJ, Schwartz SH, Auldridge M, Taylor MG, Klee HJ. 2004. The tomato carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 1 genes contribute to the formation of the flavor volatiles beta-ionone, pseudoionone, and geranylacetone. The Plant Journal 40, 882–892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tetlow IJ, Bowsher CG, Emes MJ. 2003. Biochemical properties and enzymic capacities of chromoplasts isolated from wild buttercup (Ranunculus acris L.). Plant Science 165, 383–394 [Google Scholar]
  45. The Tomato Genome Consortium 2012. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485, 635–641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tjaden J, Möhlmann T, Kampfenkel K, Neuhaus Gudrun HaE. 1998. Altered plastidic ATP/ADP-transporter activity influences potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber morphology, yield and composition of tuber starch. The Plant Journal 16, 531–540 [Google Scholar]
  47. van Wijk KJ, Baginsky S. 2011. Plastid proteomics in higher plants: current state and future goals. Plant Physiology 155, 1578–1588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yang Y, Qiang X, Owsiany K, Zhang S, Thannhauser TW, Li L. 2011. Evaluation of different multidimensional LC-MS/MS pipelines for isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ)-based proteomic analysis of potato tubers in response to cold storage. Journal of Proteome Research 10, 4647–4660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yang Y, Thannhauser TW, Li L, Zhang S. 2007. Development of an integrated approach for evaluation of 2-D gel image analysis: impact of multiple proteins in single spots on comparative proteomics in conventional 2-D gel/MALDI workflow. Electrophoresis 28, 2080–2094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zeng Y, Pan Z, Ding Y, Zhu A, Cao H, Xu Q, Deng X. 2011. A proteomic analysis of the chromoplasts isolated from sweet orange fruits [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck]. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 5297–5309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES