Skip to main content
AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses logoLink to AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
. 2013 Mar;29(3):511–515. doi: 10.1089/aid.2012.0197

Short Communication: HIV Type 1 Subtype C Variants Transmitted Through the Bottleneck of Breastfeeding Are Sensitive to New Generation Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies Directed Against Quaternary and CD4-Binding Site Epitopes

Elizabeth S Russell 1,*, Suany Ojeda 1, Genevieve G Fouda 2, Steven R Meshnick 3, David Montefiori 2, Sallie R Permar 2, Ronald Swanstrom 1,4,
PMCID: PMC3581069  PMID: 23075434

Abstract

Mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 subtype C can occur in utero, intrapartum, or via breast milk exposure. While not well understood, there are putative differences in the mechanisms involved with the distinct routes of vertical HIV transmission. Here, we address the question of whether specific viral characteristics are common to variants transmitted through breastfeeding that may facilitate evasion of innate or adaptive immune responses. We amplified the envelope gene (env) from the plasma of six infants during acute infection who were infected with HIV-1 subtype C through breastfeeding, and from three available matched maternal samples. We sequenced the full-length env genes in these subjects revealing heterogeneous viral populations in the mothers and homogeneous populations in the infants. In five infants, the viral population arose from a single variant, while two variants were detected in the remaining infant. Infant env sequences had fewer N-linked glycosylation sites and shorter sequences than those of the available matched maternal samples. Though the small size of the study precluded our ability to test statistical significance, these results are consistent with selection for virus with shorter variable loops and fewer glycosylation sites during transmission of HIV-1 subtype C in other settings. Transmitted envs were resistant to neutralization by antibodies 2G12 and 2F5, but were generally sensitive to the more broadly neutralizing PG9, PG16, and VRC01, indicating that this new generation of broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies could be efficacious in passive immunization strategies.


Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) through breastfeeding (BF) makes up one-third to one-half of all mother-to-child transmission events.1 The mechanism(s) of transmission, however, are poorly understood. The oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract of breastfed infants are exposed daily to both cell-free and cell-associated HIV-1,24 yet the majority of infants remain uninfected even if neither mother nor baby receive antiretroviral prophylaxis.5 This inefficiency of transmission indicates that anatomical, innate, and/or adaptive mechanisms of protection are able to prevent transmission to a great extent.611 Maternal antibodies could prevent infection either through direct binding of virus in the breast milk, or by their systemic and mucosal presence in the infant. This passive maternal immunity in the infant increases in concentration during the last trimester of gestation, and continues to pass into the infant through breastfeeding.

Studies of in utero and intrapartum transmission have shown a universal bottleneck in genetic diversity from mother to child, as well as differences in the characteristics of transmitted virus for in utero versus intrapartum transmission.12,13 Data are very limited for breastfeeding pairs, but one study of three breast milk transmission events found a similar bottleneck for HIV-1 subtype A.14 We previously demonstrated that the viral population found in infants infected intrapartum tended to be more heterogeneous than populations from infants infected in utero, and that viruses from infants infected intrapartum tended to have shorter variable loops and fewer glycosylation sites than the parent viral population.13,15 Others had similar findings for infants mostly infected intrapartum, though they only found differences in glycosylation sites and not variable loop lengths.16

In this article, we present data on viral sequences from three mother–child pairs plus three additional infants where the infant became HIV DNA positive between 6 and 12 weeks postpartum through exposure to breast milk, with the goal of exploring whether known selective pressures influence this route of mother-to-child transmission. Participant plasma samples were collected from the Malaria and HIV-1 in Pregnancy (MHP) prospective cohort.1720 The MHP study was approved by the Malawi College of Medicine Research Committee and the Institutional Review Board at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Informed consent was obtained from all mothers. Women and their newborn infants received single-dose nevirapine according to the HIVNET 012 protocol20 and breastfeeding was initiated. Plasma and cell pellets were isolated from blood collected from the mothers at labor-ward admission, and blood was collected via heel-sticks from the infants at three time points: within 48 h of birth, at 6 weeks, and at 12 weeks of age. Infants who were HIV-1 DNA negative by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)21 at 0 and 6 weeks, then positive at 12 weeks were classified as infected postpartum through breastfeeding (BF). Viral RNA and cell-associated DNA were isolated and amplified using single-genome env gene amplification, as has been described previously,15,22 to ensure that most amplifications were initiated with a single template without artifactual recombination during PCR between multiple template sequences. The HIV-1 env DNA single genome amplification protocol was the same as the RNA protocol following reverse transcription (GenBank accession numbers JN983803–JN983805).

Sequences were aligned using the L-INS-I method in MAFFT version 5.8.23 A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed with PHYML24 using the general time reversible plus gamma (α ∼0.25 for each tree) evolutionary model chosen by FindModel (hiv.lanl.gov) with four rate substitution categories. Trees were resampled 100 times and bootstrap values greater than 70 were considered significant. In a tree including all sequences, each infant or mother–infant pair clustered together as a distinct clade (Supplementary Fig. S1; Supplementary Data are available online at www.liebertpub.com/aid). Cell-free (viral RNA) and cell-associated (viral DNA) viral populations were highly similar in the infant, as expected in acute infection, and allowed for analysis of viral sequences from blood plasma or cell pellets from BF-infected infants as available (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table S1). Five of six infants appeared to be infected with a single variant, while in the remaining infant (942) a second minor variant was amplified from two distinct reactions. In the three mother–infant paired samples, maternal populations were more heterogeneous than the infant populations, demonstrating a bottleneck in viral diversity during HIV-1 subtype C BF transmission (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table S1). Within-participant sequence diversity was conducted using the Kimura two-parameter method in MEGA4.25,26 Infant viral env populations were more homogeneous than maternal populations, and the infant populations were highly similar in their low diversity, with ≤0.2% diversity in infants with single variants. In addition, using the Poisson-Fitter tool,27 sequence populations from all infants had a Poisson distribution of mutations and a phylogeny that coalesced to an inferred consensus sequence representing a virus present at or near the time of HIV-1 transmission (data not shown) and predicted time since most recent common ancestor (MRCA) was also less than 12 weeks for all (84 days), supporting transmission during breastfeeding. For infant 942 the minor variant and recombinant sequences were excluded in this analysis. Thus, we infer that in five of six BF mother–infant pairs a single variant was transmitted or established the infant infection, while in the sixth infant a second minor variant was identified.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees for (A) unmatched infant cell-associated HIV DNA env sequences and (B–D) matched mother–infant pairs. (B–D) Filled triangles indicate maternal env RNA HIV sequences, open circles infant HIV env RNA sequences, and filled circles infant HIV env DNA sequences. Arrows point to cloned env genes. Outgroups have been cropped for space.

In maternal–infant pair 942 there is evidence for the transmission/replication of two maternal variants in the infant (Fig. 1). Using a Highlighter plot (hiv.lanl.gov) (data not shown), we found 41/49 infant sequences were nearly identical with mutations following a model of random evolution. Two infant sequences were distinct, indicating a second transmitted variant; the final viral RNA infant sequence was a recombinant of the two sequences. Because we used single-genome amplification, a method with a very low probability of recombination during amplification, we propose recombination within the infant as the likely source. Analysis with Poisson-Fitter found all 942 infant sequences had a mean hamming distance (HD) of 3.4 and MRCA of 64 days. Yet upon removal of the two minor variant sequences the mean HD decreased to 1.6 and the MRCA to 31 days, demonstrating their influence in the analysis. Both sequences could have been transmitted to the infant during the same transmission event, or through two separate events. Our data are similar to those reported in cohorts of heterosexual transmission, where the likelihood of transmission of multiple variants is around 20%, and overall suggest that the low probability of transmission for any given exposure generally results in the transmission of a single variant when an infection does occur.12,2834

We next compared the number of putative N-linked glycosylation sites (N-glycosite program, hiv.lanl.gov) and sequence length between mother and infant viral populations. Fewer glycosylation sites and shorter full-length env sequences were seen in infants compared to their mothers over env in all three transmission pairs (Supplementary Table S1). These differences were not common to a particular variable or constant region (data not shown). The small sample size of this study does not allow testing for statistical significance of these differences between matched pairs, but the differences are of a magnitude similar to the significant results from our previous work with intrapartum transmission pairs and other studies of undetermined intrapartum (IP)/BF transmission.16,35 A larger sample size would be needed to confirm an association.

The presence of multiple variants in infant 942 could represent separate transmission events, or multiple variants simultaneously transmitted in a single event. It is worth noting that the two variants clustered on the same tree branch compared to the more diverse maternal viral population (Fig. 1). This phenomenon was also seen in an IP transmission pair for HIV-1 subtype B.36 This similarity between variants could be stochastic or it could suggest selection for certain characteristics (in breast milk, during transmission, or through selective amplification in the infant).3739 Other studies have presented conflicting results testing the hypothesis that selection is influenced by neutralizing antibodies, and transmitted variants are generally resistant to neutralization.14,36,39 Thus, we investigated the neutralizing antibody resistance profile of these subtype C infant viral variants transmitted through breast milk for comparison.

The consensus (or transmitted/founder) infant env gene (or a close match with 1 nt change for 942 and 1266) from each infant was cloned as previously described15 (Fig. 1). Viruses were assayed as Env pseudotyped viruses for sensitivity to soluble CD4 (sCD4) and to a panel of monoclonal antibodies [2G12, 2F5, 4E10, IgG1b12, PG9, PG16 (gifts of Dennis Burton), VRC01 (gift of John Mascola), CH31 (gift of Bart Haynes)], and subtype C HIVIG. Titers are reported as the antibody concentration or reciprocal serum dilution with a 50% reduction in relative luminescence units, as previously described.40 Values were interpolated using 5 parameter curve-fitting. As expected for subtype C virus, no pseudotyped infant virus was sensitive to monoclonal antibodies 2G12 or 2F5 up to a concentration of 25 μg/ml.40 Five of the six pseudotyped infant viruses were sensitive to 4E10 and PG16 within this range, while 1677 was resistant to both. All infant viruses were sensitive to PG9, and all but 942 were sensitive to VRC01 and CH31.

The panel of neutralizing antibodies used in this study represents both the previous generation of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with potent neutralization of subtype B HIV-1, yet importantly also includes more recently identified mAbs with extensive breadth even against the previously “difficult to neutralize” HIV-1 subtype C. The resistance profiles found for the infant clones described here are similar to other studies of newly infected infant viral variants of several HIV-1 subtypes.14,16,36,41 While we saw little neutralization to 1b12 (Table 1) compared to some other studies where 50% or more of viruses were sensitive,41,42 the results were similar to our previous study of uncultured Envelope pseudotypes from virus newly transmitted from mother to child.15 Only one study of three infants infected through breast milk39 also analyzed sensitivity to the recently identified broadly neutralizing PG9 and PG16 antibodies.43,44 Similarly, all six infant clones tested herein were sensitive to PG9, and all but one were sensitive to PG16, which have a conformational epitope in the V1/V2 region. In addition, the sensitivity of these variants to the CD4 binding-site antibodies VRC01 and CH31 further demonstrates that transmitted infant subtype C viruses are not inherently resistant to neutralization and that recently transmitted viruses may have neutralizing epitopes in common among all prevalent subtypes. These antibodies clearly have enhanced breadth that includes neutralization of subtype C, and for this reason may represent a useful tool for passive immunization in regions where clade C HIV-1 is prevalent.41 These data in particular support the CD4 binding site as a promising target for infant vaccine design.

Table 1.

50% Neutralization Sensitivity of Infant Envelope Clones

Infant MHP ID 1B12 μg/ml 2G12 μg/ml 2F5 μg/ml 4E1O μg/ml sCD4 μg/ml PG-9 μg/ml PG-16 μg/ml VRC01 μg/ml CH31 μg/ml HIVIG-C dilution
329 >25 >25 >25 17.11 13.54 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 7.62 11.23
591 8.88 >25 >25 5.78 15.11 0.17 0.03 0.08 0.16 71.69
703 >25 >25 >25 7.52 7.14 0.43 0.03 0.15 0.06 59.35
942 >25 >25 >25 0.75 21.15 0.06 0.03 >25 >25 65.05
1266 >25 >25 >25 13.36 >25 0.02 <0.01 0.05 0.13 93.65
1677 >25 >25 >25 >25 >25 1.06 >25 1.5 0.43 103.89

MHP, malaria and HIV-1 in pregnancy.

In summary, we analyzed env sequence data from six infants infected with HIV-1 subtype C through breastfeeding, including three transmission pairs. There was a strong genetic bottleneck during transmission, and more than one variant was transmitted in only one of six infants. Viral envelopes were generally resistant to the monoclonal neutralizing antibodies 2G12 and 2F5, yet were generally sensitive to 4E10 and the more recently identified antibodies PG9, PG16, VRC01, and CH31. The neutralizing sensitivity of these postnatally transmitted virus variants supports the use of the new generation of broadly neutralizing antibodies directed against quaternary V1/V2 epitopes or the CD4 binding site for infant passive immunization strategies, and also implicates these epitopes in infant HIV vaccine design.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data
Supp_Fig1.pdf (76.2KB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Table1.pdf (23.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Malawian mothers and infants for their participation, the MHP nursing staff and technicians for excellent logistical and technical support, and Jesus Salazar Gonzalez for helpful advice in the preparation of this manuscript. This research was supported by NIH awards to S.R.M. (R21-AI49084) and R.S. (R37-AI44667), and by the UNC CFAR (P30-AI50410). E.R. was supported by an NIH Training Grant (T32 AI07419).

Author Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  • 1.Rainwater SM. Wu X. Nduati R, et al. Cloning and characterization of functional subtype A HIV-1 envelope variants transmitted through breastfeeding. Curr HIV Res. 2007;5:189–197. doi: 10.2174/157016207780076986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Russell ES. Kwiek JJ. Keys J, et al. The genetic bottleneck in vertical transmission of subtype C HIV-1 is not driven by selection of especially neutralization-resistant virus from the maternal viral population. J Virol. 2011;85:8253–8262. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00197-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Walker LM. Phogat SK. Chan-Hui PY, et al. Broad and potent neutralizing antibodies from an African donor reveal a new HIV-1 vaccine target. Science. 2009;326:285–289. doi: 10.1126/science.1178746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hocini H. Becquart P. Bouhlal H, et al. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor inhibits infection of monocytes and lymphocytes with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 but does not interfere with transcytosis of cell-associated virus across tight epithelial barriers. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000;7:515–518. doi: 10.1128/cdli.7.3.515-518.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dunn DT. Newell ML. Ades AE. Peckham CS. Risk of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission through breastfeeding. Lancet. 1992;340:585–588. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92115-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Farquhar C. Mbori-Ngacha DA. Redman MW, et al. CC and CXC chemokines in breastmilk are associated with mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission. Curr HIV Res. 2005;3:361–369. doi: 10.2174/157016205774370393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pancera M. McLellan JS. Wu X, et al. Crystal structure of PG16 and chimeric dissection with somatically related PG9: Structure-function analysis of two quaternary-specific antibodies that effectively neutralize HIV-1. J Virol. 2010;84:8098–8110. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00966-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Verhofstede C. Demecheleer E. De Cabooter N, et al. Diversity of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) env sequence after vertical transmission in mother-child pairs infected with HIV-1 subtype A. J Virol. 2003;77:3050–3057. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.5.3050-3057.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kwiek JJ. Russell ES. Dang KK, et al. The molecular epidemiology of HIV-1 envelope diversity during HIV-1 subtype C vertical transmission in Malawian mother-infant pairs. AIDS. 2008;22:863–871. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f51ea0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mwapasa V. Rogerson SJ. Kwiek JJ, et al. Maternal syphilis infection is associated with increased risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV in Malawi. AIDS. 2006;20:1869–1877. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000244206.41500.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Salazar-Gonzalez JF. Bailes E. Pham KT, et al. Deciphering human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission and early envelope diversification by single-genome amplification and sequencing. J Virol. 2008;82:3952–3970. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02660-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Giorgi EE. Funkhouser B. Athreya G, et al. Estimating time since infection in early homogeneous HIV-1 samples using a Poisson model. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:532. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Salazar-Gonzalez JF. Salazar MG. Learn GH, et al. HIVAVIA Center: Origin and evolution of HIV-1 in breast milk determined by single-genome amplification and sequencing. J Virol. 2011;85:2751–2763. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02316-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Luo W. Yang H. Rathbun K, et al. Detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 DNA in dried blood spots by a duplex real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:1851–1857. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.4.1851-1857.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Samleerat T. Braibant M. Jourdain G, et al. Characteristics of HIV type 1 (HIV-1) glycoprotein 120 env sequences in mother-infant pairs infected with HIV-1 subtype CRF01_AE. J Infect Dis. 2008;98:868–876. doi: 10.1086/591251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mwapasa V. Rogerson SJ. Molyneux ME, et al. The effect of Plasmodium falciparum malaria on peripheral and placental HIV-1 RNA concentrations in pregnant Malawian women. AIDS. 2004;18:1051–1059. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200404300-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Thenin S. Samleerat T. Tavernier E, et al. Envelope glycoproteins of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants issued from mother-infant pairs display a wide spectrum of biological properties. Virology. 2012;426(1):12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2012.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.UNAIDS: Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. 2008.
  • 19.Kishko M. Somasundaran M. Brewster F, et al. Genotypic and functional properties of early infant HIV-1 envelopes. Retrovirology. 2011;8:67. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-8-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kassaye S. Lee E. Kantor R, et al. Drug resistance in plasma and breast milk after single-dose nevirapine in subtype C HIV type 1: Population and clonal sequence analysis. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2007;23:1055–1061. doi: 10.1089/aid.2007.0045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Becquart PN. Chomont P. Roques P, et al. Compartmentalization of HIV-1 between breast milk and blood of HIV-infected mothers. Virology. 2002;300:109–117. doi: 10.1006/viro.2002.1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Verani A. Lusso P. Chemokines as natural HIV antagonists. Curr Mol Med. 2002;2:691–702. doi: 10.2174/1566524023361862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lewis P. Nduati R. Kreiss JK, et al. Cell-free human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in breast milk. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:34–39. doi: 10.1086/513816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kong X. West JT. Zhang H, et al. The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope confers higher rates of replicative fitness to perinatally transmitted viruses than to nontransmitted viruses. J Virol. 2008;82:11609–11618. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00952-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kwiek JJ. Mwapasa V. Milner DA, Jr, et al. Maternal-fetal microtransfusions and HIV-1 mother-to-child transmission in Malawi. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Binley JM. Wrin T. Korber B, et al. Comprehensive cross-clade neutralization analysis of a panel of anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 monoclonal antibodies. J Virol. 2004;78:13232–13252. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.23.13232-13252.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu X. Parast AB. Richardson BA, et al. Neutralization escape variants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 are transmitted from mother to infant. J Virol. 2006;80:835–844. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.2.835-844.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Katoh K. Kuma K. Toh H. Miyata T. MAFFT version 5: Improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:511–518. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Keele BF. Giorgi EE. Salazar-Gonzalez JF, et al. Identification and characterization of transmitted and early founder virus envelopes in primary HIV-1 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:7552–7557. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802203105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li M. Salazar-Gonzalez JF. Derdeyn CA, et al. Genetic and neutralization properties of subtype C human immunodeficiency virus type 1 molecular env clones from acute and early heterosexually acquired infections in Southern Africa. J Virol. 2006;80:11776–11790. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01730-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Van de Perre P. Simonon A. Hitimana DG, et al. Infective and anti-infective properties of breastmilk from HIV-1-infected women. Lancet. 1993;341:914–918. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91210-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Satomi M. Shimizu M. Shinya E, et al. Transmission of macrophage-tropic HIV-1 by breast-milk macrophages via DC-SIGN. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:174–181. doi: 10.1086/426829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gray ES. Meyers T. Gray G, et al. Insensitivity of paediatric HIV-1 subtype C viruses to broadly neutralising monoclonal antibodies raised against subtype B. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Guay LA. Musoke P. Fleming T, et al. Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: HIVNET 012 randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:795–802. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)80008-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nduati RW. John GC. Richardson BA, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected cells in breast milk: Association with immunosuppression and vitamin A deficiency. J Infect Dis. 1995;172:1461–1468. doi: 10.1093/infdis/172.6.1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.van der Strate BW. Beljaars L. Molema G, et al. Antiviral activities of lactoferrin. Antiviral Res. 2001;52:225–239. doi: 10.1016/s0166-3542(01)00195-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Abrahams M-R. Quantitating the multiplicity of infection with HIV-1 subtype C. J Virol. 2009;83(8):3556–3567. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02132-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dickover RE. Garratty EM. Plaeger S. Bryson YJ. Perinatal transmission of major, minor, and multiple maternal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variants in utero and intrapartum. J Virol. 2001;75:2194–2203. doi: 10.1128/JVI.75.5.2194-2203.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Guindon S. Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003;52:696–704. doi: 10.1080/10635150390235520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Henderson GJ. Hoffman NG. Ping LH, et al. HIV-1 populations in blood and breast milk are similar. Virology. 2004;330:295–303. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shugars DC. Sweet SP. Malamud D, et al. Saliva and inhibition of HIV-1 infection: Molecular mechanisms. Oral Dis. 2002;8(Suppl 2):169–175. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.8.s2.7.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang H. Rola M. West JT, et al. Functional properties of the HIV-1 subtype C envelope glycoprotein associated with mother-to-child transmission. Virology. 2010;400:164–174. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.12.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tamura K. Dudley J. Nei M. Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1596–1599. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data
Supp_Fig1.pdf (76.2KB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Table1.pdf (23.7KB, pdf)

Articles from AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES