Skip to main content
Clinical Microbiology Reviews logoLink to Clinical Microbiology Reviews
. 1989 Jul;2(3):270–277. doi: 10.1128/cmr.2.3.270

The avian haemophili.

P J Blackall 1
PMCID: PMC358120  PMID: 2670190

Abstract

There are four currently recognized taxa to accommodate the avian haemophili: Haemophilus paragallinarum, Pasteurella avium, Pasteurella volantium, and Pasteurella species A (the last three being formerly united as Haemophilus avium). A range of other taxa has also been recognized, but they have been neither named nor assigned to a genus. All of these various taxa, legitimate and otherwise, have the common characteristic of requiring V factor, but not X factor, for in vitro growth. Several recent studies have established the phenotypic properties that allow the differentiation of the recognized taxa, both named and unnamed. The serological properties of H. paragallinarum, the causative agent of infectious coryza of chickens, has received considerable recent attention. In contrast, many questions on the pathogenicity and virulence mechanisms of H. paragallinarum remain unanswered. Another area requiring further work is the identification of those antigens responsible for inducing protective immunity in vaccinated or naturally infected chickens.

Full text

PDF
270

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arzey G. G. The effects of infectious coryza on the egg production of a layer flock. Aust Vet J. 1987 Apr;64(4):124–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1987.tb09653.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BORNSTEIN S., SAMBERG Y. The therapeutic effect of streptomycin on infectious coryza of chickens caused by Hemophilus gallinarum. II. Isolation and culture of Hemophilus gallinarum, and some of its biochemical reaction. Am J Vet Res. 1954 Oct;15(57):612–616. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Biberstein E. L., White D. C. A proposal for the establishment of two new Haemophilus species. J Med Microbiol. 1969 Feb;2(1):75–78. doi: 10.1099/00222615-2-1-75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackall P. J. Antimicrobial drug resistance and the occurrence of plasmids in Haemophilus paragallinarum. Avian Dis. 1988 Oct-Dec;32(4):742–747. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blackall P. J. Biochemical properties of catalase-positive avian haemophili. J Gen Microbiol. 1988 Oct;134(10):2801–2805. doi: 10.1099/00221287-134-10-2801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blackall P. J., Eaves L. E. Serological classification of Australian and South African isolates of Haemophilus paragallinarum. Aust Vet J. 1988 Nov;65(11):362–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1988.tb14271.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blackall P. J., Farrah J. G. An evaluation of commercial discs for the determination of the growth factor requirements of avian haemophili. Vet Microbiol. 1985 Jan;10(2):125–131. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(85)90014-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blackall P. J. Further comparison of adjuvants for an inactivated infectious coryza vaccine. Avian Dis. 1988 Oct-Dec;32(4):831–835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blackall P. J., Reid G. G. Further efficacy studies on inactivated, aluminum-hydroxide-adsorbed vaccines against infectious coryza. Avian Dis. 1987 Jul-Sep;31(3):527–532. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Blackall P. J., Yamamoto R. 'Haemophilus gallinarum'--a re-examination. J Gen Microbiol. 1989 Feb;135(Pt 2):469–474. doi: 10.1099/00221287-135-2-469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Blackall P. J., Yamamoto R. Whole-cell protein profiles of Haemophilus paragallinarum as detected by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Avian Dis. 1989 Jan-Mar;33(1):168–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Broom A., Sneath P. H. Numerical taxonomy of Haemophilus. J Gen Microbiol. 1981 Sep;126(1):123–149. doi: 10.1099/00221287-126-1-123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Davis R. B., Rimler R. B., Shotts E. B., Jr Efficacy studies on Haemophilus gallinarum bacterin preparations. Am J Vet Res. 1976 Feb;37(2):219–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. FUJIWARA H., KONNO S. HISTOPATHOLOGICAL STUDIES ON INFECTIOUS CORYZA OF CHICKENS. I. FINDINGS IN NATURALLY INFECTED CASES. Natl Inst Anim Health Q (Tokyo) 1965;5:36–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gingrich W., Schlenk F. Codehydrogenase I and Other Pyridinium Compounds as V-Factor for Hemophilus influenzae and H. parainfluenzae. J Bacteriol. 1944 Jun;47(6):535–550. doi: 10.1128/jb.47.6.535-550.1944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grebe H. H., Hinz K. H. Vorkommen von Bakterien der Gattung Haemophilus bei verschiedenen Vogelarten. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1975 Nov;22(9):749–757. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hinz K. H. Heat-stable antigenic determinants of Haemophilus paragallinarum. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1980;27(8):668–676. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.1980.tb01730.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Iritani Y., Iwaki S., Yamaguchi T. Biological activities of crude polysaccharide extracted from two different immunotype strains of Hemophilus gallinarum in chickens. Avian Dis. 1981 Jan-Mar;25(1):29–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Iritani Y., Iwaki S., Yamaguchi T., Sueishi T. Determination of types 1 and 2 hemagglutinins in serotypes of Hemophilus paragallinarum. Avian Dis. 1981 Apr-Jun;25(2):479–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Iritani Y., Katagiri K., Arita H. Purification and properties of Haemophilus paragallinarum hemagglutinin. Am J Vet Res. 1980 Dec;41(12):2114–2118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Iritani Y., Sugimori G., Katagiri K. Serologic response to Haemophilus gallinarum in artifically infected and vaccinated chickens. Avian Dis. 1977 Jan-Mar;21(1):1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kilian M. A rapid method for the differentiation of Haemophilus strains. The porphyrin test;. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1974 Dec;82(6):835–842. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1974.tb02381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kilian M. A taxonomic study of the genus Haemophilus, with the proposal of a new species. J Gen Microbiol. 1976 Mar;93(1):9–62. doi: 10.1099/00221287-93-1-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kume K., Sawata A. Immunologic properties of variants dissociated from serotype 1 Haemophilus paragallinarum strains. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1984 Feb;46(1):49–56. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.46.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kume K., Sawata A., Nakai T., Matsumoto M. Serological classification of Haemophilus paragallinarum with a hemagglutinin system. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jun;17(6):958–964. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.6.958-964.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kume K., Sawata A., Nakai T. Serologic and immunologic studies on three types of hemagglutinin of Haemophilus paragallinarum serotype 1 organisms. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1983 Dec;45(6):783–792. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.45.783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kume K., Sawata A., Nakase Y. Haemophilus infections in chickens. 3. Immunogenicity of serotypes 1 and 2 strains of Haemophilus paragallinarum. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1980 Dec;42(6):673–680. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.42.673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kume K., Sawata A., Nakase Y. Haemophilus infections in chickens. I. Characterization of Haemophilus paragallinarum isolated from chickens affected with coryza. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1978 Feb;40(1):65–73. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.40.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kume K., Sawata A., Nakase Y. Relationship between protective activity and antigen structure of Haemophilus paragallinarum serotypes 1 and 2. Am J Vet Res. 1980 Jan;41(1):97–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Madsen E. B., Bisgaard M., Mutters R., Pedersen K. B. Characterization of Pasteurella species isolated from lungs of calves with pneumonia. Can J Comp Med. 1985 Jan;49(1):63–67. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Malkinson M., Machany S., Aronovici A., Davidov K., Weisman Y. Mixed infection with Chlamydia psittaci, fowlpox virus and Haemophilus gallinarum in broiler breeder chicks. Vet Rec. 1987 May 9;120(19):461–462. doi: 10.1136/vr.120.19.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Matsumoto M., Yamamoto R. A broth bacterin against infectious coryza: immunogenicity of various preparations. Avian Dis. 1971 Jan-Mar;15(1):109–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Matsumoto M., Yamamoto R. Protective quality of an aluminum hydroxide-absorbed broth bacterin against infectious coryza. Am J Vet Res. 1975 Apr;36(4 Pt 2):579–582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mutters R., Piechulla K., Mannheim W. Phenotypic differentiation of Pasteurella sensu stricto and the Actinobacillus group. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jun;3(3):225–229. doi: 10.1007/BF02014890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Neumann U., Hinz K. H. Elektrophoretische Auftrennung von Haemophilus-Proteinen im Polyacrylamid-Gel. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A. 1977 Jun;238(2):244–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Otsuki K., Iritani Y. Preparation and immunological response to a new mixed vaccine composed of inactivated Newcastle disease virus, inactivated infectious bronchitis virus, and inactivated Hemophilus gallinarum. Avian Dis. 1974 Jul;18(3):297–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. PAGE L. A. Haemophilus infections in chickens. I. Characteristics of 12 Haemophilus isolates recovered from diseased chickens. Am J Vet Res. 1962 Jan;23:85–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Page L. A., Rosenwald A. S., Price F. C. Haemophilus infections in chickens. IV. Results of laboratory and fieldtrials of formalinized bacterins for the prevention of disease caused by Haemophilus gallinarum. Avian Dis. 1963 Aug;7(3):239–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Piechulla K., Hinz K. H., Mannheim W. Genetic and phenotypic comparison of three new avian Haemophilus-like taxa and of Haemophilus paragallinarum Biberstein and White 1969 with other members of the family Pasteurellaceae Pohl 1981. Avian Dis. 1985 Jul-Sep;29(3):601–612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Reece R. L., Coloe P. J. The resistance to anti-microbial agents of bacteria isolated from pathological conditions of birds in Victoria, 1978 to 1983. Aust Vet J. 1985 Nov;62(11):379–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1985.tb14214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Reid G. G., Blackall P. J. Comparison of adjuvants for an inactivated infectious coryza vaccine. Avian Dis. 1987 Jan-Mar;31(1):59–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Reid G. G., Blackall P. J. Pathogenicity of Australian isolates of Haemophilus paragallinarum and Haemophilus avium in chickens. Vet Microbiol. 1984 Feb;9(1):77–82. doi: 10.1016/0378-1135(84)90080-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rimler R. B., Davis R. B. Infectious coryza: in vivo growth of Haemophilus gallinarum as a determinant for cross protection. Am J Vet Res. 1977 Oct;38(10):1591–1593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rimler R. B., Davis R. B., Page R. K. Infectious coryza: cross-protection studies, using seven strains of Haemophilus gallinarum. Am J Vet Res. 1977 Oct;38(10):1587–1589. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rimler R. B., Shotts E. B., Jr, Brown J., Davis R. B. The effect of sodium chloride and NADH on the growth of six strains of haemophilus species pathogenic to chickens. J Gen Microbiol. 1977 Feb;98(2):349–354. doi: 10.1099/00221287-98-2-349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rimler R. B. Studies of the pathogenic avian Haemophili. Avian Dis. 1979 Oct-Dec;23(4):1006–1008. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sawata A., Kume K., Nakai T. Hemagglutinin of Haemophilus paragallinarum serotype 1 organisms. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1984 Feb;46(1):21–29. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.46.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sawata A., Kume K., Nakai T. Susceptibility of Haemophilus paragallinarum to bactericidal activity of normal and immune chicken sera. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1984 Dec;46(6):805–813. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.46.805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sawata A., Kume K., Nakase Y. Antigenic structure and relationship between serotypes 1 and 2 of Haemophilus paragallinarum. Am J Vet Res. 1979 Oct;40(10):1450–1453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sawata A., Kume K., Nakase Y. Biologic and serologic relationships between Page's and Sawata's serotypes of Haemophilus paragallinarum. Am J Vet Res. 1980 Nov;41(11):1901–1904. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sawata A., Kume K., Nakase Y. Haemophilus infections in chickens. 2. Types of Haemophilus paragallinarum Isolates from chickens with infectious coryza, in relation to Haemophilus gallinarum strain no. 221. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1978 Dec;40(6):645–652. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.40.645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sawata A., Kume K., Nakase Y. Hemagglutinin of Haemophilus paragallinarum serotype 2 organisms: occurrence and immunologic properties of hemagglutinin. Am J Vet Res. 1982 Jul;43(7):1311–1314. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sawata A., Kume K. Relationships between virulence and morphological or serological properties of variants dissociated from serotype 1 Haemophilus paragallinarum strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Jul;18(1):49–55. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.1.49-55.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sawata A., Nakai T., Kume K., Yoshikawa H., Yoshikawa T. Intranasal inoculation of chickens with encapsulated or nonencapsulated variants of Haemophilus paragallinarum: electron microscopic evaluation of the nasal mucosa. Am J Vet Res. 1985 Nov;46(11):2346–2353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sawata A., Nakai T., Kume K., Yoshikawa H., Yoshikawa T. Lesions induced in the respiratory tract of chickens by encapsulated or nonencapsulated variants of Haemophilus paragallinarum. Am J Vet Res. 1985 May;46(5):1185–1191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schalm O. W., Beach J. R. Cultural Requirements of the Fowl-Coryza Bacillus. J Bacteriol. 1936 Feb;31(2):161–169. doi: 10.1128/jb.31.2.161-169.1936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Thornton A. M., Blackall P. J. Serological classification of Australian isolates of Haemophilus paragallinarum. Aust Vet J. 1984 Aug;61(8):251–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1984.tb15533.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Winslow C. E., Broadhurst J., Buchanan R. E., Krumwiede C., Rogers L. A., Smith G. H. The Families and Genera of the Bacteria: Final Report of the Committee of the Society of American Bacteriologists on Characterization and Classification of Bacterial Types. J Bacteriol. 1920 May;5(3):191–229. doi: 10.1128/jb.5.3.191-229.1920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yamaguchi T., Iritani Y., Hayashi Y. Serological response of chickens either vaccinated or artificially infected with Haemophilus paragallinarum. Avian Dis. 1988 Apr-Jun;32(2):308–312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Yamaguchi T., Iritani Y. Occurrence of two hemagglutinins on Haemophilus paragallinarum strain 221 and comparison of their properties. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1980 Dec;42(6):709–711. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.42.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Yamaguchi T., Iwaki S., Iritani Y. Latex agglutination test for measurement of type-specific antibody to Haemophilus paragallinarum in chickens. Avian Dis. 1981 Oct-Dec;25(4):988–995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Yamaguchi T., Iwaki S., Iritani Y. Serological and immunological differences between two hemagglutinins of Haemophilus paragallinarum strain 221. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1980 Dec;42(6):713–715. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.42.713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Microbiology Reviews are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES