Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2013 Jan 14;288(8):5984–5991. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.445528

An Extracellular Ion Pathway Plays a Central Role in the Cooperative Gating of a K2P K+ Channel by Extracellular pH*

Wendy González ‡,1, Leandro Zúñiga §,1,2, L Pablo Cid §, Barbara Arévalo , María Isabel Niemeyer §,3, Francisco V Sepúlveda §,4
PMCID: PMC3581391  PMID: 23319597

Background: TASK-3 is gated cooperatively by extracellular pH.

Results: Mutual electrostatic interaction between K+ ions and two pH-sensing histidines occurs in a recently discovered extracellular ion pathway.

Conclusion: Channel opening requires neutralization of both sensing histidines, with neutralization of the second sensor becoming favored by an electrostatic effect K+ ions.

Significance: The work suggests a central role for the extracellular ion pathway in the gating of K2P K+ channels.

Keywords: Electrophysiology, Gating, Membrane proteins, Patch Clamp, Potassium Channels, H+ Gating, K2P Channels, Cooperativity, Extracellular Ion Pathway

Abstract

Proton-gated TASK-3 K+ channel belongs to the K2P family of proteins that underlie the K+ leak setting the membrane potential in all cells. TASK-3 is under cooperative gating control by extracellular [H+]. Use of recently solved K2P structures allows us to explore the molecular mechanism of TASK-3 cooperative pH gating. Tunnel-like side portals define an extracellular ion pathway to the selectivity filter. We use a combination of molecular modeling and functional assays to show that pH-sensing histidine residues and K+ ions mutually interact electrostatically in the confines of the extracellular ion pathway. K+ ions modulate the pKa of sensing histidine side chains whose charge states in turn determine the open/closed transition of the channel pore. Cooperativity, and therefore steep dependence of TASK-3 K+ channel activity on extracellular pH, is dependent on an effect of the permeant ion on the channel pHo sensors.

Introduction

K+ leak or background conductances are responsible for setting the resting membrane potential (1) and play crucial roles in the regulation of neuronal firing, muscle contraction, hormone, neurotransmitter and enzyme secretion, and transepithelial transport (2). K+ channels of a family known as K2P have been found to be the molecular counterparts of these widespread background K+ conductances. Best known families of K+ channels are membrane proteins with six (Kv) or two (Kir) transmembrane α-helices (TMs)5 and one highly conserved P-domain that forms the K+ selectivity filter in a tetrameric arrangement around the conduction pathway (3). In contrast, K2P K+ channels have four TMs and two P-domains (4, 5) and form dimers with their P-domains arranged in pseudo-fourfold symmetry (6). Although Kv and Kir channels are active at depolarized or hyperpolarized potentials, respectively, and play important roles during large membrane potential excursions typical of excitable cells, ubiquitously expressed K2P channels are essentially voltage-independent and behave as open rectifiers as expected for K+ leakage pathways (2).

Although appearing as passive leaks, K2P channels are finely tuned by a variety of stimuli. Important among these are intra- and extracellular [H+] that gate the activity of 10 of the 15 known K2P mammalian proteins (7). Examples are TASK subfamily K2P channels TASK-1 (K2P3.1) and TASK-3 (K2P9.1), which are exquisitely sensitive to extracellular proton concentration (811). TASK-3 is fundamental to various cellular functions including the modulation of sleep (12), aldosterone/renin secretion (13, 14), and O2 sensing (15), and its dysfunction has been linked to the Birk Barel mental retardation dysmorphism syndrome (16). TASK-3 is inactive (closed) at acid extracellular pH (pHo) but activates (opens) as pHo is increased. The effect of pHo on gating is cooperative occurring with a Hill number nH of 2 (10). Although it is known that the pHo sensor is a histidine residue (His-98) residing near the extracellular mouth of the pore (9, 10), the cooperativity mechanism of the gating process remains unexplored.

Recent insight into the function of K2P channels has come from the x-ray crystallographic resolution of TWIK-related arachidonic acid-stimulated K+ channel (TRAAK) and TWIK-1 structures (17, 18). A distinguishing feature of these structures is an extracellular cap, corresponding to the TM1-P1 extracellular loop, which obstructs direct movement of ions into the pore normal to the plane of the membrane and defines instead two tunnel-like side portals, the extracellular ion pathway (EIP), which gives bilateral access to K+ binding sites in the selectivity filter (SF). We now explore the consequences of such an arrangement on the gating of TASK-3 by extracellular protons, in particular on the cooperativity mechanism. Our data strongly suggest that in these dimeric channels, both His-98 pHo sensors, which lie close to the wall of the EIP side portals, need to be neutralized for TASK-3 to become active and that neutralization of the sensor in one subunit enhances the propensity of that in the second subunit to become neutral. The permeant ion plays a central role in this change of acidity of the histidine sensor, an effect that is enhanced by the electrostatic effect of a glutamate residue (Glu-70) lining the wall of EIPs communicating the extracellular space and the outer mouth of the SF.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Electrophysiological Assays

Mus musculus TASK-1 (K2P3.1, GenBankTM accession number NP_034738) plasmid was obtained from Dr. Donghee Kim (Rosalind Franklin University, Chicago, IL). Cavia porcellus TASK-3 (K2P5.1, GenBank accession number AF212827) plasmid was provided by Dr. Jürgen Daut (Marburg University, Germany). DNAs were subcloned into the pCR3.1 vector. Transient transfections were done in HEK-293 cells using CD8 cotransfection to identify effectively transfected cells (19). The CD8 antigen was revealed with microspheres (Dynabeads) coated with an anti-CD8 antibody. Site-directed mutagenesis and chimera constructions were done by PCR (19, 20). Tandem dimer TASK-3 constructs were made after insertion of XbaI restriction sites to facilitate concatenation (21). The validity of the concatenated channel approach rests on the assumption that the linked subunits are both correctly inserted in the membrane and form the dimer. This sometimes requires shortening the linker between subunits, as reported before for the TASK-2 channel (21). There was no need for amino acid deletion for proper function of the concatenated TASK-3 constructs. Indeed the identical behavior of WT-H98N and H98N-WT TASK-3 constructs strongly suggests the correct assembling of concatenated channels.

Cells were transferred to the stage of an inverted microscope for study, where they were continuously superfused with a bathing solution containing (in mm) 67.5 Na2SO4, 4 KCl, 1 potassium gluconate, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 105 sucrose, 10 HEPES/Tris, pH 7.5. The high K+ solution was obtained by equimolar replacement of Na+ by K+. The pipette solution contained (in mm) 8 KCl, 132 potassium gluconate, 1 MgCl2, 10 EGTA, 1 Na3ATP, 0.1 GTP, 10 HEPES, pH 7.4. To measure the extracellular pH dependence of the currents, HEPES (used for pH 7.0, 7.5, and 8.0 in the bathing medium) was replaced with AMPSO (pH 8.5 and 9.0), CAPS (pH 9.5, 10, and 11), or MES (pH 6.5, 6.0, 5.5, and 5.0). In all experiments intra- and extracellular chloride was kept at 10 mm.

Standard whole-cell patch clamp recordings were performed as described elsewhere (22, 23). Currents were measured at several potentials as indicated. All chemicals were from Sigma.

The effect of pH on currents was evaluated by plotting current (I) measured at the indicated membrane potential, against extracellular [H+]. For graphical representation, average ± S.E. values of I/Imax values are used. The data were obtained from individual experiments. When appropriate, fit of a Hill equation to the data was done for each individual experiment. The parameters are defined in Equation 1.

graphic file with name zbc00813-4182-m01.jpg

A similar analysis was done for inhibitor effect. Fits were done using the Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm as implemented in the SigmaPlot software.

Molecular Model for TASK-3

The TASK-3 homology model was built using Modeller (24). The template used was the TWIK-1 structure (Protein Data Bank (PDB): 3UKM) (18). Modeller created 10 structures, and the homology model with the lower value of root mean squared deviation of the backbone atoms regarding the template (root mean squared deviation = 0.185 Å) was selected. The multiple alignment used to build TASK-3 model is based on that published by Brohawn et al. (17). The homology model of TASK-3 was validated using PROCHECK (25), and the tautomeric state of the neutral His-98 residue was assigned according to Stansfeld et al. (26). The homology model was embedded into a pre-equilibrated phosphatidyl oleoyl phosphatidylcholine bilayer in a periodic boundary condition box (10.2 × 10 × 10.5 nm) with pre-equilibrated TIP3P water molecules (27). Three K+ ions were associated to the models in positions S0, S2, and S4 of the selectivity filter and two water molecules at sites S1 and S3, respectively (26). Fifty-eight potassium ions were added to the aqueous phase to simulate a concentration of 150 mm K+. The same number of chloride ions was added for electroneutrality. The initial configuration of the system was first optimized using energy minimization followed by a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation at 300 K for 1 ns. The protonation state of His-98 was assigned to the optimized homology model of TASK-3 using the CHARMM27 (28) force field. Models bearing both neutral (His0-His0) and one (His+-His0) or both (His+-His+) His-98 residues protonated were improved using energy minimization followed by two equilibrated MD simulations at 300 K for 8 ns (supplemental Fig. S1). The MD simulations were done in an isobaric isothermic ensemble using harmonic restraints of 0.5 kcal/mol Å2 applied to the backbone atoms, but not to the selectivity filter. All MD simulations were performed using the NAMD program (29). The electrostatic interactions were computed with no truncations using the particle mesh Ewald algorithm (30) under periodic boundary conditions.

The mutant TASK-3-E70K model was built in silico using the plug-in mutate of the VMD program on the basis of the optimized homology model of the TASK-3 wild type bearing both neutral His-98 residues. The TASK-3-E70K mutant was inserted into the membrane, minimized, and equilibrated following the same protocol as applied for wild-type TASK-3.

Electrostatic Potential Calculations

The electrostatic potential, φ(r), was calculated using the Poisson-Boltzmann equation implemented in the PBEQ module of the program CHARMm following a previously published protocol (31) (see also supplemental Fig. S2).

RESULTS

Molecular Modeling of TASK-3 Structure

We used TWIK-1 structure (18) to construct homology models for TASK-3 to gain a better understanding of the gating process. TWIK-1 shares with TASK channels the histidine sensor in P-domain 1. Amino acid sequences for TWIK-1 and TASK-3, on the other hand, are 23% identical and 62% similar in the extracellular cap/P1 region. Secondary structure prediction gives the α-helices likely to constitute the conserved extracellular cap seen in K2P channel structures. Models bearing both neutral (His0-His0) and one (His+-His0) or both (His+-His+) His-98 residues protonated were subjected to MD. Fig. 1, A–C, show representations of the models at the end of 8-ns MD runs, with EIP depicted as a colored cavity. In all cases, the neutral His-98 side chains remain behind the SF at the bottom surface of the side portals near the pore. Protonation is accompanied by a movement of the charged His-98 side chains toward the EIP, which narrows the cavities as indicated by the change in color of EIP walls (Fig. 1, B and C). Both in the singly (His+-His0) and in the doubly (His+-His+) protonated His-98 situations, but not in the His0-His0 model, the outermost K+ ion bound at the selectivity filter becomes destabilized, implying a nonconductive channel. This is shown in Fig. 1D, which plots the position of the K+ ion sited at S0 at the beginning of separate 8-ns MD runs as a function of time. A previous MD study using a TASK-1 homology model proposed that a water molecule located behind the selectivity filter is critical for the stability of the SF, which is disrupted upon His-98 protonation (26). This water molecule is not present in the resolved K2P structures and was not essential for the conformational changes described here. The MD data shown above suggest a requirement for side chain neutralization of both His-98 sensors of TASK-3 for channel activity, with protonation of single sensor leading to channel closure.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Modeling the extracellular ion pathway and the effect of the charge state of the pHo sensors of TASK-3 K+ channel. A, a molecular model for the TASK-3 pore based on the structure of TWIK-1 is shown with both sensing His-98 residues in the neutral state (His-980-His-980). Shown is a ribbon representation with K+ ions and H2O molecules in the selectivity filter. His-98 pHo-sensing residues and Glu-70 at the base of the extracellular cap are shown in stick representation. CH2 identifies α-helices 2 of the extracellular cap whose C-terminal end points above the selectivity filter. The EIP is drawn as a solid tunnel connecting the extracellular space and the entrance of the selectivity filter. HOLE color code is used: blue, radius >1.15 Å; green, radius >0.6–1.15 Å. B and C show details of the models for the His-98+-His-980 and His-98+-His-98+ configurations. All illustrations are taken at the end of 8-ns MD runs. In D, the position of the outermost K+ ion during MD runs is plotted for the three states of protonation of the pHo-sensing histidines. The asterisk indicates the moment when the ion escaped to the extracellular space during the MD run.

Role of Individual Histidine pHo Sensors of TASK-3

To test whether neutralization of both pHo sensors is indispensable to lead to the open state of TASK-3, we have performed functional assays using concatenated channels (21). Tandem channels containing either a normal set of pHo sensors, mixed structures containing one able and one neutralized (H98N mutation) pHo sensor, or two neutralized pHo sensors were assayed for pHo sensitivity by patch clamp after expression in HEK-293 cells. Gating by pHo of wild-type TASK-3 channels was cooperative with pK½ 6.0 ± 0.05 and nH 2.1 ± 0.09 (means ± S.E., n = 9). Extracellular H+ gating of the concatenated TASK-3 wild-type channels (WT-WT) did not differ significantly from that of the nonconcatenated equivalent channels (Fig. 2A). Doubly mutated TASK-3-H98N proteins (H98N-H98N) were pHo-insensitive, but the mixed WT-H98N and H98N-WT constructs followed pHo in a noncooperative manner with pK½ values of 4.9 and 5.1 (Fig. 2A and supplemental Table S1). Similar results were obtained at physiological 5 mm extracellular K+ (Fig. 2B and supplemental Table S1). These results confirm the prediction of a requirement for both sensing histidines to be neutralized for TASK-3 to open. They also suggest that neutralization of a first His-98 sensor affects the pKa of the second, making it more susceptible to H+ loss.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Using concatenated TASK-3 channels to reveal the mechanism of cooperativity in pHo gating. A and B show the pHo sensitivity of concatenated constructs of WT and pHo-insensitive TASK-3 channels. A, pHo dependence curves for the following TASK-3 constructs: WT-WT, H98N-H98N, WT-H98N, and H98N-WT. Experiments were done in 140 mm [K+] symmetrical intra/extracellular solutions. B, pHo dependence curves for WT-WT and mixed concatenated constructs WT-H98N and H98N-WT obtained with 5 mm extracellular [K+] (intracellular [K+] 140 mm). Results are means ± S.E. Lines are fits of the Hill equation constructed using the average of fitted parameters of the individual experiments (41). Parameters obtained are reported in supplemental Table 1.

Minimal Kinetic Model for Cooperative pHo Gating of TASK-3

The results with concatenated TASK-3 channels shown in Fig. 1 suggest that there is a requirement for both sensing histidines (His-98) to be neutralized for TASK-3 to open. The simplest model representing this situation is

graphic file with name zbc00813-4182-m02.jpg

where CH22+, CH+, and C are doubly protonated, singly protonated, and unprotonated closed states and O is an open state. The dissociation constant for the first transition is 0.5Kd1, as two charged sensors, in monomers 1 and 2, could be deprotonated. The second transition is governed by 2Kd2, as the unprotonated closed state C can be generated from a complex containing a neutralized sensor at monomer 1 or 2. The relative open probability of the system will be given by

graphic file with name zbc00813-4182-m03.jpg

where

graphic file with name zbc00813-4182-m04.jpg

and

graphic file with name zbc00813-4182-m05.jpg

Fit of Equation 2 to the data for the WT-WT construct shown in Fig. 1A yielded the KH1 and KH2 of 5.82 × 10−6 ± 1.2 × 10−6 m and 1.1 × 10−12 ± 0.3 × 10−12 m. From these fitted constants, it is possible to obtain a value for

graphic file with name zbc00813-4182-m06.jpg

of 14.2. This result implies that neutralization of a first His-98 sensor of TASK-3 affects the pKa of the second, making it at least 14-fold more susceptible to H+ loss.

Electrostatic Interactions Determine TASK-3 Gating Cooperativity

Calculations (supplemental Fig. S3a) along the ion conduction pathway show a strong peak of positive potential imparted upon the SF by the doubly protonated His-98 side chains, the His+-His+ configuration. This is much decreased in the His+-His0 situation. On this basis, we would propose that K+ ion occupation of the outermost binding sites of SF would be higher in His+-His0 than in His+-His+. This provides a rationale for cooperativity due to an increased facility of His-98 deprotonation in His+-His0 when compared with that in His+-His+ because of an electrostatic influence of K+ ions.

The side portals predicted by modeling TASK-3 are, like those of TWIK-1 (18), funnel-shaped, becoming narrower nearer to the SF opening (Fig. 1A). Amino acids lining the walls of this EIP, including Gln-68, Glu-70, Pro-71, Gly-75, and Gln-209 as well as His-98, should confer a predominantly negative electrostatic potential to the cavity. As the cavity size (supplemental Fig. S4) is of the same order as a scantily hydrated monovalent ion, the electrostatic potential is expected to make a large contribution to local cation concentrations within the EIP. Glutamic acid 70 has been shown to lie near proton-sensing His-98 in TASK-3 and to modulate pHo sensitivity (32). Given the possible role of Glu-70 in determining EIP electrostatic potential, we wondered whether it might be important in the cooperativity between pHo sensors in TASK-3. The sensitivity of TASK-3 to pHo, but not the cooperative nature of gating, is affected by extracellular [K+]. Fig. 3A compares the pHo gating of TASK-3 at [K+] 0.5, 5, and 140 mm, together with fits of the Hill equation with nH not differing from 2 and respective pK½ values of 7.13, 6.67, and 5.97. The effect of [K+] agrees with the idea that increased occupancy by K+ favors the open state by affecting His-98 pKa. Mutation E70K acid-shifted the pHo dependence curves (Fig. 3B), as expected if Glu-70 also contributed to a local rise in [H+]. Remarkably, cooperativity was now absent at 0.5 mm [K+] and markedly diminished at 5 mm, but the fit to 140 mm [K+] data gave an nH 2.0 ± 0.2 (see also supplemental Table S2). Graphs in Fig. 3, C and E, show a summary of fitted parameters of TASK-3 experiments at various voltages. There was no marked change in cooperativity with voltage, but there was a tendency for lower pK½ with depolarization, especially at the lower K+ concentrations. Cooperativity was low, as judged by nH values, after E70K mutation, and there was an increased effect of depolarization on both nH and pK½ (Fig. 3, D and F). This we attribute to an increased [K+] at the EIP by depolarization-promoted efflux of K+ from the high intracellular concentration (23).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Effect of reversing the charge at Glu-70 on the pHo sensitivity of TASK-3. A and B, extracellular pHo dependence curves of WT TASK-3 and TASK-3-E70K mutant measured at extracellular [K+] of 0.5, 5, and 140 mm. Intracellular [K+] was 140 mm throughout. Results are means ± S.E. Continuous lines are fits of the Hill equation constructed using the average of fitted parameters of the individual experiments (41). Parameters are reported in supplemental Table S2. In C–F, average (±S.E., n = 3–9) fitted parameters for the pHo dependence curves at various voltages for TASK-3 and TASK-3-E70K mutant at the indicated extracellular [K+] are shown. Lines are linear regressions using the average values.

Our results suggest an effect of residue Glu-70 on [H+] and [K+] in the vicinity of His-98 pH sensor so that charge reversal in TASK-3-E70K would lead to an apparent acid shift in pK½ and a decrease in cooperativity. The loss of cooperativity in TASK-3-E70K therefore would be due to the increase in positive electrostatic potential (see supplemental Fig. S3b) because of charge reversal leading to a decrease in local K+ concentration. The recovery of TASK-3-E70K cooperativity at higher K+ concentration corroborates this interpretation.

Interestingly, TASK-1 K+ channel, which is another closely related member of the TASK subgroup of K2P channels, has a lysine at the site equivalent to TASK-3 Glu-70, and its pHo gating is noncooperative. As shown before (11), and confirmed here (supplemental Fig. S5 and supplemental Table S3), pHo gating of TASK-1 becomes cooperative at high [K+]o. TASK-1 has a lysine residue at the place of TASK-3 Glu-70, but mutating this to glutamic acid, as in TASK-1-K70E, although shifting the pHo dependence curves did not confer cooperativity at the lower [K+]o. It is interesting to note that side chains on the wall of the putative EIP of TASK-1 make it hostile to cations, with a further positively charged residue, Arg-68 in place of Gln-68 of TASK-3.

Pharmacological Blockade of TASK-3 Is Also Dependent upon EIP Electrostatics

Independent evidence that Glu-70 might be an important determinant of electrostatic potential at the external ion pathway of TASK-3 comes from inhibition experiments by positively charged blockers Zn2+ and ruthenium red (RR). Blockade of TASK-3 by Zn2+ and RR are K+-dependent and show virtual voltage independence, as expected from an interaction with superficial sites at the selectivity filter. Both Glu-70 and His-98 are proposed to form the blocker binding site. It is also possible that Glu-70 side chain additionally favors the interaction of the blockers by increasing their local concentration electrostatically. Fig. 4A shows that both TASK-3 and its mutant TASK-3-E70K are blocked by Zn2+ and that the potency of the effect is decreased by increasing K+ concentration. Interestingly, as for the H+ concentration effect on gating, the effect of Zn2+ was also cooperative, suggesting more than one blocker site (Fig. 4A and supplemental Table S4). The shift in the KD (KD of TASK-3-E70K versus KD of TASK-3) for inhibition is compatible with a change in electrostatic potential (Δφ) (31) of 46 mV at the site of action of the blocker. We have used the TWIK-1-based model of TASK-3 (His-980-His-980 configuration) to explore the interaction of Zn2+ with the channel. Fig. 4B shows a Zn2+ ion positioned at a site in the EIP where the switch from Glu-70 to Lys is predicted to give a Δφ of ∼46 mV. After an 8-ns MD run (Fig. 4C), the Zn2+ appears coordinated by His-98, which hat has flipped upwards, Glu-70, and Gln-209 (not shown). This conformational change is accompanied by disruption of the selectivity filter and a switch of the position of the second His-98 from behind the SF toward the EIP as though forming a second Zn2+ site and thus providing a rationale for cooperative inhibition. Fig. 4D shows the result of an MD run with two Zn2+ ions originally positioned as for Fig. 4B but at opposite ends of the EIP.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Cooperative blockade of TASK-3 by Zn2+ is consistent with bilateral binding sites within the extracellular ion pathway. A, concentration dependence of TASK-3 and TASK-3-E70K mutant inhibition by Zn2+. The experiments were conducted using 140 mm intracellular K+ and 5 or 140 mm extracellular K+. The lines show fits to cooperative inhibition model obtained with the parameters in supplemental Table S4. The model for TASK-3 has been used to explore the binding of Zn2+ to the extracellular entrance pathway of the channel. Results are means ± S.E. In B, a Zn2+ ion was positioned at a point within the EIP such that replacement of Glu-70 by lysine, as in TASK-3-E70K, would give a Δ in electrostatic potential of ∼46 mV (see “Results”). The sensing histidines are in the neutral configuration. In C, the position adopted by the Zn2+ ion at the end of an 8-ns MD run is shown. Notice the bending upwards from behind SF into the EIP of the His-98 side chains in both monomers as well as the twisting of the selectivity filter hydroxyls. D shows the positions of the Zn2+ ions at the end of an 8-ns MD run after positioning one Zn2+ at each side of the EIP as in B.

In contrast with the Zn2+ effect, RR inhibits TASK-3 in a noncooperative manner with a KD of 10 μm (supplemental Fig. S6a). This is explained by the shape of the inhibitor that could plausibly be coordinated by both His-98-Glu-70 pairs in each monomer and thus span across the SF mouth (supplemental Fig. S6b). Use of the TASK-3 minus TASK-3-E70K Δφ value calculated above predicts an RR (valence 6) ratio KD, TASK-3-E70K/KD, of 6 × 104. This prediction matches well the lack of effect of RR up to 1 mm on TASK-3-E70K channels.

DISCUSSION

TASK-3 shares with congener K2P channels TASK-1 and TWIK-1 a sensitivity to extracellular pH that is transduced through protonation and neutralization of histidine 98 located at P1. Although TWIK-1 pHo gating is complex, involving a profound change in selectivity only recently begun to be understood (33), more is known about TASK-1 gating. Gating of K2P channels by extracellular H+ is known to occur at the selectivity filter by a process that has been thought to be, at least superficially, akin to C-type inactivation commonly encountered in other K+ channels (reviewed in Ref. 34). K+ dependence of TASK-1 pHo gating is in accord with this concept (11, 35). Yuill et al. (36) modeled TASK-1 based on the structure of the KcsA channel and first suggested that His-98 sensor was located behind the selectivity filter where its protonation might alter the shape of the SF producing a nonconducting state. The same authors show that site-directed mutagenesis affecting ion selectivity produced concomitant changes in pHo dependence, consistent with SF gating. Later MD studies provide the important observation that protonation of His-98 leads to a flipping upwards of the sensing His-98, which, in addition to producing a deformation of the SF moving away K+-coordinating backbone carbonyl groups from its lumen, would create “an electropositive barrier to K+ ions at the outer mouth of the channel” (26). This proposal is interesting as it links pHo gating with its known K+ dependence. It necessitates, however, that the protonated His-98 side chain would somehow avoid the bulk solution bathing the extracellular aspect of the channel to exert this proposed electrostatic effect. Differences in pHo sensitivity between TASK-1 and TASK-3 have been attributed to the effect of residues in the large TM1-P1 extracellular loop on the sensing machinery. Indeed Clarke et al. (32) employed TM1-P1 loop exchange TASK-1/TASK-3 chimeras to show its importance in pHo dependence and Zn2+ blockade, concluding that the loop must lie close to the channel pore. A point not addressed in the literature cited above is that of the higher sensitivity of TASK-3 to external H+ that is expressed through the cooperative nature of the gating process.

The recent discovery of the structure of TWIK-1 and TWIK-related arachidonic acid-stimulated K+ channel (17, 18), two K2P K+ channels, has revealed the presence of an extracellular helical cap that is likely to be a conserved feature among members of this family of transport proteins. The extracellular cap, made of the TM1-P1 linkers, impedes extracellular access to the SF on the main axis of conduction of the channel. Instead it defines what has been called side portals or the EIP that only allows bilateral access to the mouth of the selectivity filter through rather narrow tunnel-like structures. We show that the presence of these side entrances crucially determines the main gating process of TASK-3, namely the opening and closing of the pore in response to changes in extracellular pH. Our data indicate that the concentration of K+ in the cavity must be a major determinant of pH sensitivity and the cooperativity exhibited by TASK-3 in its gating process. The side chains of pH-sensing histidine residues, one in each monomer of these homodimeric channels, line the side portals and constrain their diameter, bursting into the cavity when protonated. In channel structures lacking the extracellular cap characteristic of K2P channels, we would expect the protonated His-98 imidazole charge to be screened out by the external solution (31). Instead its electrostatic effect should be heightened in the constrained space of the EIP, particularly after its narrowing by flipping upwards of the His-98 side chain. The negatively charged Glu-70 side chains, already known to be located close to the His-98 sensors (32), also form part of the side portal wall and influence the electrostatic potential in EIP, presumably becoming a major determinant of the EIP K+ concentration and affecting the occupancy of the outermost SF K+ binding sites.

Independent evidence for the importance of electrostatics of the EIP comes from experiments with TASK-3 blockers Zn2+ and RR. The inhibition by these, and other divalent cations, has been shown to depend on the presence of the Glu-70 residue (32, 3739) and a neutral His-98 (32, 38). Here we show that inhibition of TASK-3 by Zn2+, just as pHo gating, is cooperative and strongly impeded by increasing extracellular K+ concentration. MD experiments suggest that two Zn2+ ions might plausibly bind at sites defined by neutral His-98 side chains flipped upwards into the EIP at both sides of the SF entrance. The presence of Glu-70, however, does not appear to be necessary as Zn2+ still inhibited TASK-3-E70K channels, albeit with a higher KD. The results suggest that the main effect of Glu-70 on Zn2+ inhibition is in electrostatically affecting its concentration in the EIP. A similar role for Glu-70 was surmised from the effect of divalent cations on TASK-3 single channel conductance (37). Our experiments comparing Zn2+ inhibition of TASK-3 and TASK-3-E70K allowed us an estimation of the electrostatic potential due to the charge replacement at a site of action of the divalent cation. Use of this value predicted a lack of effect of RR6+ on TASK-3-E70K that has been previously reported (39) and is corroborated here. In contrast to Zn2+ inhibition, RR blockade was not cooperative, in line with the binding of a single inhibitory molecule. Using the x-ray structure of RR and our model of TASK-3, we show the plausibility of such an interaction with RR spanning between the two Glu-70/His-98 sites. Czirják and Enyedi (39), although lacking structural information, had already suspected such an arrangement when proposing that RR acted by tethering the two subunits of TASK-3 through their Glu-70 side chains.

Our results suggest a molecular explanation for the cooperativity and [K+] dependence in the gating of TASK-3. We postulate that the vicinity of His-98 charged side chains to the outer part of the SF leads to a decrease in K+ occupancy because of an electrostatic effect of the charged imidazole rings. Neutralization of one of the His-98 sensors results in a decrease in electropositive potential accompanied by an increased occupancy of the outermost selectivity filter K+ binding sites. Increased K+ occupancy should in turn affect the readiness with which the imidazole of the remaining charged His-98 loses its H+, thus accounting for the observed increase in acidity of pKa observed experimentally for the neutralization of a second pHo sensor in TASK-3. Our interpretation provides a good explanation for the loss of cooperativity in TASK-3-E70K and its recovery at higher K+ concentration.

The presence of side portals with predominantly negative walls in TASK-3 is crucial in providing a restricted space for the gating process we postulate. The effect of local environment in the modulation of the pKa of key residues in both enzymes and ion channels is known to play a role in their catalysis/gating mechanisms (22, 40). The mechanism for cooperativity of channel gating proposed here, a perturbation in environment caused by the transported ion itself leading to a shift in pKa of a gating residue, is, to our knowledge, novel, as is the proposed role of the newly discovered extracellular cap structure of K2P channels in the process. TASK-3 is fundamental to various cellular functions and has been implicated in disease. The structural and functional insights gained here might help in the design of molecules to interact specifically with the gating machinery of the channel and modulate its function.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Jürgen Daut (Marburg, Germany) and Donghee Kim (Chicago, IL) for providing TASK-3 and TASK-1 cDNAs and to Dr. Jacques Teulon (Paris, France) for comments on a preliminary version of the paper. CECs is funded by the Conicyt Base Finance Program.

*

This work was supported by Fondecyt Grants 1090478 (to M. I. N.) and 11100373 (to W. G.).

5
The abbreviations used are:
TM
transmembrane α-helix
EIP
extracellular ion pathway
SF
selectivity filter
MD
molecular dynamics
RR
ruthenium red
AMPSO
N-(1,1,-dimethyl-2-hydroxyethyl)-3-amino-2-hydroxypropanesulfonic acid
CAPS
3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic acid.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Hodgkin A. L., Huxley A. F. (1947) Potassium leakage from an active nerve fibre. J. Physiol. 106, 341–367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Enyedi P., Czirják G. (2010) Molecular background of leak K+ currents: two-pore domain potassium channels. Physiol. Rev. 90, 559–605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. MacKinnon R. (2003) Potassium channels. FEBS Lett. 555, 62–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lesage F., Lazdunski M. (2000) Molecular and functional properties of two-pore-domain potassium channels. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 279, F793–F801 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Goldstein S. A., Bockenhauer D., O'Kelly I., Zilberberg N. (2001) Potassium leak channels and the KCNK family of two-P-domain subunits. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 175–184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kollewe A., Lau A. Y., Sullivan A., Roux B., Goldstein S. A. (2009) A structural model for K2P potassium channels based on 23 pairs of interacting sites and continuum electrostatics. J. Gen. Physiol. 134, 53–68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lesage F., Barhanin J. (2011) Molecular physiology of pH-sensitive background K2P channels. Physiology 26, 424–437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Duprat F., Lesage F., Fink M., Reyes R., Heurteaux C., Lazdunski M. (1997) TASK, a human background K+ channel to sense external pH variations near physiological pH. EMBO J. 16, 5464–5471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Rajan S., Wischmeyer E., Xin Liu G., Preisig-Müller R., Daut J., Karschin A., Derst C. (2000) TASK-3, a novel tandem pore-domain acid-sensitive K+ channel: an extracellular histidine as pH sensor. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 16650–16657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kim Y., Bang H., Kim D. (2000) TASK-3, a new member of the tandem pore K+ channel family. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9340–9347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lopes C. M. B., Zilberberg N., Goldstein S. A. (2001) Block of Kcnk3 by protons. Evidence that 2-P-domain potassium channel subunits function as homodimers. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 24449–24452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Pang D. S., Robledo C. J., Carr D. R., Gent T. C., Vyssotski A. L., Caley A., Zecharia A. Y., Wisden W., Brickley S. G., Franks N. P. (2009) An unexpected role for TASK-3 potassium channels in network oscillations with implications for sleep mechanisms and anesthetic action. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 17546–17551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Davies L. A., Hu C., Guagliardo N. A., Sen N., Chen X., Talley E. M., Carey R. M., Bayliss D. A., Barrett P. Q. (2008) TASK channel deletion in mice causes primary hyperaldosteronism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 2203–2208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Guagliardo N. A., Yao J., Hu C., Schertz E. M., Tyson D. A., Carey R. M., Bayliss D. A., Barrett P. Q. (2012) TASK-3 channel deletion in mice recapitulates low-renin essential hypertension. Hypertension 59, 999–1005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kim D., Cavanaugh E. J., Kim I., Carroll J. L. (2009) Heteromeric TASK-1/TASK-3 is the major oxygen-sensitive background K+ channel in rat carotid body glomus cells. J. Physiol. 587, 2963–2975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Barel O., Shalev S. A., Ofir R., Cohen A., Zlotogora J., Shorer Z., Mazor G., Finer G., Khateeb S., Zilberberg N., Birk O. S. (2008) Maternally inherited Birk Barel mental retardation dysmorphism syndrome caused by a mutation in the genomically imprinted potassium channel KCNK9. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 83, 193–199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Brohawn S. G., del Mármol J., MacKinnon R. (2012) Crystal structure of the human K2P TRAAK, a lipid- and mechano-sensitive K+ ion channel. Science 335, 436–441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Miller A. N., Long S. B. (2012) Crystal structure of the human two-pore domain potassium channel K2P1. Science 335, 432–436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Cid L. P., Niemeyer M. I., Ramírez A., Sepúlveda F. V. (2000) Splice variants of a ClC-2 chloride channel with differing functional characteristics. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 279, C1198–C1210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Yon J., Fried M. (1989) Precise gene fusion by PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 4895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Zúñiga L., Márquez V., González-Nilo F. D., Chipot C., Cid L. P., Sepúlveda F. V., Niemeyer M. I. (2011) Gating of a pH-sensitive K2P potassium channel by an electrostatic effect of basic sensor residues on the selectivity filter. PLoS ONE 6, e16141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Niemeyer M. I., González-Nilo F. D., Zúñiga L., González W., Cid L. P., Sepúlveda F. V. (2007) Neutralization of a single arginine residue gates open a two-pore domain, alkali-activated K+ channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 666–671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Niemeyer M. I., Cid L. P., Peña-Münzenmayer G., Sepúlveda F. V. (2010) Separate gating mechanisms mediate the regulation of K2P potassium channel TASK-2 by intra- and extracellular pH. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 16467–16475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Fiser A., Sali A. (2003) Modeller: generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. Methods Enzymol. 374, 461–491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Laskowski R. A., MacArthur M. W., Moss D. S., Thornton J. M. (1993) PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283–291 [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Stansfeld P. J., Grottesi A., Sands Z. A., Sansom M. S., Gedeck P., Gosling M., Cox B., Stanfield P. R., Mitcheson J. S., Sutcliffe M. J. (2008) Insight into the mechanism of inactivation and pH sensitivity in potassium channels from molecular dynamics simulations. Biochemistry 47, 7414–7422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Jorgensen W. L., Chandrasekhar J., Madura J. D., Impey R. W., Klein M. I. (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Piechotta P. L., Rapedius M., Stansfeld P. J., Bollepalli M. K., Ehrlich G., Andres-Enguix I., Fritzenschaft H., Decher N., Sansom M. S., Tucker S. J., Baukrowitz T. (2011) The pore structure and gating mechanism of K2P channels. EMBO J. 30, 3607–3619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Phillips J. C., Braun R., Wang W., Gumbart J., Tajkhorshid E., Villa E., Chipot C., Skeel R. D., Kalé L., Schulten K. (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781–1802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Essmann U., Perera L., Berkowitz L. M., Darden T., Lee H., Pedersen L. G. (1995) A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577–8593 [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Carvacho I., Gonzalez W., Torres Y. P., Brauchi S., Alvarez O., Gonzalez-Nilo F. D., Latorre R. (2008) Intrinsic electrostatic potential in the BK channel pore: role in determining single channel conductance and block. J. Gen. Physiol. 131, 147–161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Clarke C. E., Veale E. L., Wyse K., Vandenberg J. I., Mathie A. (2008) The M1P1 loop of TASK3 K2P channels apposes the selectivity filter and influences channel function. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 16985–16992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Chatelain F. C., Bichet D., Douguet D., Feliciangeli S., Bendahhou S., Reichold M., Warth R., Barhanin J., Lesage F. (2012) TWIK1, a unique background channel with variable ion selectivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 5499–5504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Cohen A., Ben-Abu Y., Zilberberg N. (2009) Gating the pore of potassium leak channels. Eur. Biophys. J. 39, 61–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lopes C. M. B., Gallagher P. G., Buck M. E., Butler M. H., Goldstein S. A. (2000) Proton block and voltage gating are potassium-dependent in the cardiac leak channel Kcnk3. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 16969–16978 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Yuill K. H., Stansfeld P. J., Ashmole I., Sutcliffe M. J., Stanfield P. R. (2007) The selectivity, voltage-dependence, and acid sensitivity of the tandem pore potassium channel TASK-1: contributions of the pore domains. Pflügers Arch. 455, 333–348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Musset B., Meuth S. G., Liu G. X., Derst C., Wegner S., Pape H. C., Budde T., Preisig-Müller R., Daut J. (2006) Effects of divalent cations and spermine on the K+ channel TASK-3 and on the outward current in thalamic neurons. J. Physiol. 572, 639–657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Clarke C. E., Veale E. L., Green P. J., Meadows H. J., Mathie A. (2004) Selective block of the human 2-P domain potassium channel, TASK-3, and the native leak potassium current, IKSO, by zinc. J. Physiol. 560, 51–62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Czirják G., Enyedi P. (2003) Ruthenium red inhibits TASK-3 potassium channel by interconnecting glutamate 70 of the two subunits. Mol. Pharmacol. 63, 646–652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Ho M. C., Ménétret J. F., Tsuruta H., Allen K. N. (2009) The origin of the electrostatic perturbation in acetoacetate decarboxylase. Nature 459, 393–397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Niemeyer M. I., Cid L. P., Barros L. F., Sepúlveda F. V. (2001) Modulation of the two-pore domain acid-sensitive K+ channel TASK-2 (KCNK5) by changes in cell volume. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 43166–43174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES