Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Chim Acta. 2012 Dec 28;418:33–36. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.11.030

Genetic variation of fifteen folate metabolic pathway associated gene loci and the risk of incident head and neck carcinoma: The Women’s Genome Health Study

Robert YL Zee 1, Lynda Rose 1, Daniel I Chasman 1, Paul M Ridker 1
PMCID: PMC3582777  NIHMSID: NIHMS443599  PMID: 23276522

Abstract

Objective

Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of folate metabolic pathway (FMP) in the pathogenesis of head and neck cancinoma (HNC). Whether the genetic variation within the FMP associated genes modulates HNC remains elusive. To date, prospective, epidemiological data on the relationship of FMP gene variation with the risk of HNC are sparse.

Methods

The association between 203 tag-SNPs (tSNPs) of 15 FMP associated genes (CBS, BHMT, DHFR, FOLR1, FOLR2, FOLR3, MTHFR, MTR, MTRR, MTHFD1, RFC1, SHMT1, SLC19A1, TCN2, and TYMS) and incident HNC was investigated in 23,294 Caucasian female participants of the prospective Women’s Genome Health Study. All were free of known cancer at baseline. During a 15-year follow-up period, 55 participants developed a first ever HNC. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between genotypes and HNC risk assuming an additive genetic model. Haplotype-block analysis was also performed.

Results

A total of 11 tSNPs within DHFR, MTHFR, RFC1, and TYMS were associated with HNC risk (all p-uncorrected <0.050). Further investigation using the haplotype-block analysis revealed an association of several prespecified haplotypes of RFC1 with HNC risk (all p-uncorrected <0.050).

Conclusion

If corroborated in other large prospective studies, the present findings suggest that genetic variation within the folate metabolic pathway gene loci examined, in particular, the replication factor C-1 (RFC1) gene variation may influence HNC risk.

Keywords: Head and Neck, cancer, genetic epidemiology, single nucleotide polymorphisms, folate, homocysteine, Incident head and neck carcinoma, Risk factors, Polymorphisms

Introduction

Head and neck carcinoma (HNC), the fifth most common cancer worldwide, is one of the most challenging conditions in clinical oncology owing to its resistance to therapy and high capacity to re-populate during treatment, thus posing a serious public health burden (1, 2). In addition to the well-reported risk factors, including advanced age, alcohol abuse and tobacco use, folate deficiency --an essential (antioxidant) vitamin that is present in fruit and vegetables-- has recently been associated with an increased risk of HNC (37). Altered folate metabolism contributes to carcinogenesis via mechanisms that impair DNA synthesis, replication, repair and methylation (79). Whether the importance of folate metabolism/deficiency in the underlying pathogenesis of HNC was modulated by genetic variation within the folate metabolic pathway (FMP) associated genes remains elusive (1, 2, 10).

To date, data from large prospective, epidemiological studies on examining the relevance of FMP associated genes as potential risk markers for HNC are scarce. We, therefore, examined the potential involvement of 203 tag-single nucleotide polymorphisms (tSNPs) in fifteen FMP genes (Supplementary Data Tables I and II) with (i) baseline plasma homocysteine (hcys) levels, and (ii) incident HNC, in a large prospective cohort of 23,294 initially healthy US Caucasian middle-aged women.

Materials and methods

Study design

Details of the study design have been previously described (11). In brief, participants in the Women’s Genome Health Study (WGHS) –a genetic substudy of the Women’s Health Study (12, 13)– included initially healthy North American women aged 45 or older with no previous history of cardiovascular disease, cancer, or other major chronic illnesses. A baseline blood sample was collected during the enrollment phase of the Women’s Health Study between 1992 and 1995. Study participants, who gave an informed consent for blood-based analyses related to risks of incident chronic diseases, were followed up for incident events that were adjudicated by an endpoints committee using standardized criteria and full medical record review (12, 13). The present investigation included 23,294 Caucasian participants of the WGHS; all were free of known cardiovascular disease and cancer at baseline. During a 15-year follow-up period, 55 cases of newly diagnosed HNC were identified. As described elsewhere, DNA extracted from the baseline WGHS blood samples underwent tSNP (r2 ≈ 0.80) genotyping using the genome-wide Illumina Infinium II Human HAP300 Duo “+” platform (14, 15). The Brigham and Women’s Hospital Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research approved the study protocol.

Statistical analysis

Genotype frequencies were compared with values predicted by Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium using the chi-square test with one degree of freedom. Multivariable linear regression analysis, adjusting for age, and smoking status, was performed to assess the relationship of the tSNPs with baseline loge-transformed plasma homocysteine (lnhcys) levels. Hazard ratios (HRs) for association of each of the tSNPs with HNC were calculated separately by Cox regression analysis adjusting for age, smoking status, randomized treatment assignment, and further adjusting for baseline lnhcys levels and daily alcohol intake, assuming an additive model for genetic effects.

Haplotype estimation and inference were determined by expectation-maximization algorithm. Haplotype blocks were defined using the software Haploview v4.1. In addition, the relationship between haplotypes and HNC risk was examined by a referent (wild-homozygous) haplotype-based Cox regression analysis, adjusting for the same potential confounders/risk factors used in the single-SNP analysis. Only genes with 3 or more significant tSNPs (arbitrary cutoff) in the single-SNP analysis were further considered for a haplotype-based analysis. All analyses were carried out using SAS v9.1 package (SAS Institute Inc). A 2-tailed uncorrected p-value of 0.05 was considered a statistically significant result. Genotyping call rates were >99% per SNP.

Results

The baseline characteristics of the 23,294 initially healthy Caucasian women are shown in Table 1. Thirty-two out of the 203 SNPs evaluated were not in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium with uncorrected p-values <0.0500 (Supplementary Data Table I). In the multivariable linear regression analysis, a total of 42 SNPs (22 MTHFR, 8 MTR, 1 RFC1, 4 DHFR, 3 MTRR, 1 MTHFD1, and 3 TCN2) were differentially associated with baseline lnhcys levels (p-uncorrected <0.050; Supplementary data Table III). Results from the multivariable Cox regression analysis showed evidence for differential associations of 11 SNPs (1 MTHFR, 7 RFC1, 1 DHFR, and 2 TYMS) with HNC risk (p-uncorrected <0.050; Table 2). Supplementary Data Table IV presents the nominal (uncorrected) Cox regression results for all 203 SNPs evaluated. Further adjustment for baseline lnhcys levels, and alcohol intake showed virtually identical results (data not shown). Supplementary Data Figure I presents the linkage disequilibrium (LD) pattern of the tSNPs of RFC1 in the present sample population. The haplotype distribution (defined by Haploview v4.1) is shown in Table 3. Results from the haplotype-based analysis again showed an association of two Haploview-defined haplotypes of RFC1 with HNC risk (p-uncorrected <0.050; Table 3), consistent with the involvement of rs10033019. All SNPs evaluated were in agreement of proportionality hazard assumption.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study population

Variable N=23,294
Age, years 52.90 [48.92–59.01]
Body-mass index, kg/m2 24.89 [22.46–28.32]
Smoking status, %
 Current 11.64
 Past 37.45
 Never 50.91
Aspirin use, % 49.87
Beta-carotene use, % 49.81
Vitamin-E use, % 50.08
Current hormone use, % 43.86
Homocystenine levels, μmol/L 10.48 [8.71–12.91]
Daily alcohol intake, g/day 0.86 [0–4.64]

Data are median and interquartile range for continuous, and percentages for categorical variables.

Table 2.

Multivariable Cox regression analysis of incident head and neck carcinoma.

Genes dbSNP MA MAF Hazard Ratio 95%CI p-uncorrected snp
MTHFR rs6696752 A 0.2906 0.579 0.360–0.933 0.0246 s4
RFC1 rs2276888 A 0.4343 0.629 0.422–0.938 0.0230 s43
rs2306597 A 0.2053 0.515 0.289–0.919 0.0247 s46
rs9993224 A 0.4309 0.664 0.446–0.988 0.0437 s47
rs2066786 A 0.4310 0.637 0.427–0.951 0.0273 s48
rs6851075 G 0.3305 0.560 0.356–0.882 0.0124 s58
rs3736168 G 0.4947 1.869 1.263–2.764 0.0017 s59
rs10033019 A 0.4851 1.937 1.310–2.864 0.0009 s60
TYMS rs2847154 A 0.2349 0.477 0.272–0.836 0.0097 s116
rs2612081 A 0.2361 0.473 0.270–0.830 0.0090 s119
DHFR r6151662 A 0.0555 1.857 1.001–3.446 0.0498 S202

CI, confidence interval; MA, minor allele; MAF, minor allele frequency.

Adjusted for age, smoking status, and randomized treatment assignment.

Table 3.

Haplotype-based Cox regression analysis of incident head and neck carcinoma.

Genes * Haplotype-Block HF HR; 95%CI p-uncorrected
RFC1 Block 1
rs2276888-rs17288757-rs2306597-rs9993224-rs2066786
11111 (GGGGG) 0.56242 Referent
21122 (AGGAA) 0.16761 0.814; 0.295–2.245 0.6910
21222 (AGAAA) 0.20340 0.259; 0.079–0.849 0.0257
22122 (AAGAA) 0.05630 0.080; 0.005–1.325 0.0778
Block 2
rs13147094-rs2381375-rs3796517-rs17288033-rs2306596
11111 (GAAGA) 0.41702 Referent
11121 (GAACA) 0.10465 undetermined --
12212 (GGGGC) 0.34875 undetermined --
22112 (AGAGC) 0.11893 undetermined --
Block 3
rs6851075-rs3736168-rs10033019
111 (AAG) 0.18011 0.388; 0.131–1.152 0.0881
121 (AGG) 0.01171 undetermined --
122 (AGA) 0.47692 Referent
211 (GAG) 0.32258 0.217; 0.083–0.568 0.0019

Only haplotypes with frequency greater than 1% are shown.

1 denotes the major allele, 2 the minor allele.

CI, confidence interval; HF, haplotype frequency.

Adjusted for age, smoking status, and randomized treatment assignment.

*

as defined by Haploview v4.1

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the present prospective investigation is the first to examine the possible involvement of FMP genes in the risk of incident HNC, and we found -suggestive- evidence for an association of the genes evaluated, in particular, the replication factor C-1 (RFC1) gene locus.

Genetic variation within the FMP gene loci has been implicated in various forms of cancer including HNC (1). The FMP genes evaluated in the present study encode proteins for the complex one-carbon interconversion processes, which ultimately regulate and maintain genomic stability. Recent studies have demonstrated the effects of genetic variation within the FMP associated genes, in particular, MTHFR (C677T/rs1801133, A1298C/rs1801131, G1793A/rs2274976), MTR (A2756G/rs1805087), MTRR (A66G/rs1801394, C524T/rs1532268), SLC19A1 (A80G/rs1051266) in modulating risk of HNC (reviewed by Galbiatti and coauthors (1)). However, the present study found no association of the abovementioned gene variants with HNC risk (Supplementary Data Table III). Moreover, the present study confirmed an inverse relationship of MTR A2756G (rs1805087) (1619), MTRR A66G (rs1801394) (20) with plasma hcys levels, and a null association of MTHFD1 G1958A (rs2236225) with HNC (21), as previously reported.

The present investigation, moreover, suggests that the replication factor C-1 (RFC1) gene variation may play a role in the underlying pathogenesis of HNC. Replication factor C (RFC) is an important factor involved in DNA replication, repair mechanisms, post-translational methylation as well as cell proliferation. Recent experimental investigation of the subunit 1 of Arabidopsis RFC (AtRFC1) -a homologue of p140, the large subunit of human RFC1- showed that AtRFC1 mutations caused defects in embryogenesis and led to embryo and seed abortion (22), suggesting that RFC1 may play a similar role in embryogenesis in humans, and its relevance to the congenital malformations caused by folate deficiency. Furthermore, using interaction cloning, Uchiumi et al. showed that the large subunit of replication factor C interacts with the DNA sequence repeats of telomeres and recognizes the 5-prime-phosphate termini of double-stranded telomeric repeats, thus suggesting that replication factor C may also play a role in telomere stability or turnover (23). Telomere instability, a hallmark of tumourogenesis, is widely demonstrated to play an important role in cancer development (2426). Owing to the observed functional characteristics of RFC in relation to embryonic development (its relevance to congenital malformations due to folate deficiency), and telomere stability, the present findings encourage the need of further investigation into the possible involvement of replication factor C cascade, and the telomere-telomerase complex in the pathogenesis of HNC.

Strengths of the present study are the overall sample size, the prospective design and the complete long-term follow-up. Nonetheless, some potential limitations of our study require discussion. Our sample population was limited to Caucasian female healthcare professionals from the US. Thus, our results may not be generalizable to other racial/ethnic or socio-economic groups, geographical regions, or to males. Cautious interpretation of our present (uncorrected) findings should be exercised, and confirmation in other prospective studies is needed. Furthermore, pre-cancerous prediction of head and neck carcinoma based on SNPs analysis may be inadequate or low for clinical use (27).

In our study, we had the ability to detect, based on the present sample size, assuming 80% power, at an alpha of 0.05, an effect estimate of greater than 1.65 if the minor allele frequency is 0.50, and of greater than 3.50 if the minor allele frequency is 0.02, assuming a univariable-additive model. Thus, the present study may not have the power to detect a true low-to-modest risk of HNC associated with the gene variants tested.

In conclusion, if corroborated by other large, prospective investigations, the present data from a large cohort of apparently healthy Caucasian US females provide evidence for an association between the folate metabolic pathway associated gene variants tested, in particular, the replication factor C-1 gene locus and the risk of head and neck carcinoma.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary

Acknowledgments

Supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health HL-043851, HL-080467, and CA-047988. Collaborative scientific support for genotyping was provided by Amgen, Inc.. Special thanks to Alex Parker, PhD, for his technical expertise and insightful discussions.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

  • 1.Galbiatti AL, Ruiz MT, Maniglia JV, Raposo LS, Pavarino-Bertelli EC, Goloni-Bertollo EM. Head and neck cancer: genetic polymorphisms and folate metabolism. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;78:132–9. doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942012000100021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Marcu LG, Yeoh E. A review of risk factors and genetic alterations in head and neck carcinogenesis and implications for current and future approaches to treatment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009;135:1303–14. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0648-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Xu WH, Shrubsole MJ, Xiang YB, Cai Q, Zhao GM, Ruan ZX, et al. Dietary folate intake, MTHFR genetic polymorphisms, and the risk of endometrial cancer among Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:281–7. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sapkota A, Hsu CC, Zaridze D, Shangina O, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Mates D, et al. Dietary risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract in central and eastern Europe. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:1161–70. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9183-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Garavello W, Lucenteforte E, Bosetti C, Talamini R, Levi F, Tavani A, et al. Diet diversity and the risk of laryngeal cancer: a case-control study from Italy and Switzerland. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:85–9. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garcia-Crespo D, Knock E, Jabado N, Rozen R. Intestinal neoplasia induced by low dietary folate is associated with altered tumor expression profiles and decreased apoptosis in mouse normal intestine. J Nutr. 2009;139:488–94. doi: 10.3945/jn.108.095661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Linhart HG, Troen A, Bell GW, Cantu E, Chao WH, Moran E, et al. Folate deficiency induces genomic uracil misincorporation and hypomethylation but does not increase DNA point mutations. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:227–35. e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johanning GL, Heimburger DC, Piyathilake CJ. DNA methylation and diet in cancer. J Nutr. 2002;132:3814S–8S. doi: 10.1093/jn/132.12.3814S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kane MA. The role of folates in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Detect Prev. 2005;29:46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2004.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lambert R, Sauvaget C, de Camargo Cancela M, Sankaranarayanan R. Epidemiology of cancer from the oral cavity and oropharynx. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23:633–41. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283484795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ridker PM, Chasman DI, Zee RY, Parker A, Rose L, Cook NR, Buring JE. Rationale, design, and methodology of the Women’s Genome Health Study: a genome-wide association study of more than 25,000 initially healthy american women. Clin Chem. 2008;54:249–55. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.099366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee IM, Cook NR, Gaziano JM, Gordon D, Ridker PM, Manson JE, et al. Vitamin E in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: the Women’s Health Study: a randomized controlled trial. Jama. 2005;294:56–65. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.1.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ridker PM, Cook NR, Lee IM, Gordon D, Gaziano JM, Manson JE, et al. A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1293–304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zee RY, Ridker PM, Chasman DI. Genetic variants of 11 telomere-pathway gene loci and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Women’s Genome Health Study. Atherosclerosis. 2011;218:144–6. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zee RY, Ridker PM, Chasman DI. Genetic variants in eleven telomere-associated genes and the risk of incident cardio/cerebrovascular disease: The Women’s Genome Health Study. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412:199–202. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen J, Stampfer MJ, Ma J, Selhub J, Malinow MR, Hennekens CH, Hunter DJ. Influence of a methionine synthase (D919G) polymorphism on plasma homocysteine and folate levels and relation to risk of myocardial infarction. Atherosclerosis. 2001;154:667–72. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(00)00469-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dekou V, Gudnason V, Hawe E, Miller GJ, Stansbie D, Humphries SE. Gene-environment and gene-gene interaction in the determination of plasma homocysteine levels in healthy middle-aged men. Thromb Haemost. 2001;85:67–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Harmon DL, Shields DC, Woodside JV, McMaster D, Yarnell JW, Young IS, et al. Methionine synthase D919G polymorphism is a significant but modest determinant of circulating homocysteine concentrations. Genet Epidemiol. 1999;17:298–309. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(199911)17:4<298::AID-GEPI5>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Silaste ML, Rantala M, Sampi M, Alfthan G, Aro A, Kesaniemi YA. Polymorphisms of key enzymes in homocysteine metabolism affect diet responsiveness of plasma homocysteine in healthy women. J Nutr. 2001;131:2643–7. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.10.2643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gaughan DJ, Kluijtmans LA, Barbaux S, McMaster D, Young IS, Yarnell JW, et al. The methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) A66G polymorphism is a novel genetic determinant of plasma homocysteine concentrations. Atherosclerosis. 2001;157:451–6. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(00)00739-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kruszyna L, Lianeri M, Rydzanicz M, Gajecka M, Szyfter K, Jagodzinski PP. Polymorphic variants of folate metabolism genes and the risk of laryngeal cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37:241–7. doi: 10.1007/s11033-009-9643-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xia ST, Xiao LT, Bi DL, Zhu ZH. Arabidopsis replication factor C subunit 1 plays an important role in embryogenesis. Zhi Wu Sheng Li Yu Fen Zi Sheng Wu Xue Xue Bao. 2007;33:179–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Uchiumi F, Ohta T, Tanuma S. Replication factor C recognizes 5′-phosphate ends of telomeres. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;229:310–5. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bisoffi M, Heaphy CM, Griffith JK. Telomeres: prognostic markers for solid tumors. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:2255–60. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Charames GS, Bapat B. Genomic instability and cancer. Curr Mol Med. 2003;3:589–96. doi: 10.2174/1566524033479456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Londono-Vallejo JA. Telomere instability and cancer. Biochimie. 2008;90:73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Klein C, Lohmann K, Ziegler A. The Promise and Limitations of Genome-wide Association Studies. Jama. 2012;308:1867–8. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary

RESOURCES