Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2013 Feb 27;3:1352. doi: 10.1038/srep01352

Hydrothermal Fabrication of Hierarchically Anatase TiO2 Nanowire arrays on FTO Glass for Dye-sensitized Solar Cells

Wu-Qiang Wu 1, Bing-Xin Lei 1, Hua-Shang Rao 1, Yang-Fan Xu 1, Yu-Fen Wang 1, Cheng-Yong Su 1, Dai-Bin Kuang 1,a
PMCID: PMC3583000  PMID: 23443301

Abstract

Hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture arrays consisting of long TiO2 nanowire trunk and numerous short TiO2 nanorod branches on transparent conductive fluorine-doped tin oxide glass are successfully synthesized for the first time through a facile one-step hydrothermal route without any surfactant and template. Dye-sensitized solar cells based on the hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture array photoelectrode of 18 μm in length shows a power conversion efficiency of 7.34% because of its higher specific surface area for adsorbing more dye molecules and superior light scattering capacity for boosting the light-harvesting efficiency. The present photovoltaic performance is the highest value for the reported TiO2 nanowires array photoelectrode.

Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) as one of the promising alternatives to conventional silicon solar cells have attracted immense scientific and industrial research interests owing to their low cost for the material and production, excellent photoelectrical conversion efficiency1,2,3,4,5. The typical TiO2 nanoparticle based photoelectrode showed significant power conversion efficiency (PCE) due to the huge surface area for the loading of dye molecules. However, the disordered stacking of TiO2 nanocrystallines limits the electron transport and reduces the electron lifetime because of the random network of crystallographically misaligned crystallites, and lattice mismatches at the grain boundaries6,7,8,9, which impedes the further improvement of the PCE. Hence, one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures such as nanorods (NRs), nanowires (NWs) or nanotubes (NTs) have been studied as photoanode materials for DSSCs and shown respectable photovoltaic performance owing to their excellent electron transport and light scattering ability10,11,12,13,14. However, almost all of the solution-phase synthesized TiO2 NW arrays on fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) glass were rutile TiO2 because of very small lattice mismatch (<2%) between FTO and rutile TiO215,16,17. On the other hand, superior photovoltaic performance were normally obtained for anatase TiO2 compared to the rutile structure resulting from larger amount of absorbed dye and faster electron transport rate18. Our recent report on the hierarchical anatase TiO2 nanowire arrays on Ti foil has shown significant enhancement of photovoltaic performance compared to that of TiO2 nanowire without the branches11. In addition, another indirect route via synthesizing anatase TiO2 nanowires powders first and then fabricating photoanodes through screen-printing method was reported19, but one can notice that there is still a big challenge for the direct growth of anatase TiO2 NW on the FTO glass since a large lattice mismatch of ~19% between FTO and anatase TiO214. Recently, a reactive pulsed DC magnetron sputtering method to fabricate vertically aligned anatase TiO2 nanowire arrays on FTO glass was demonstrated, but its application in DSSCs was still limited by its high-technical requirements as well as difficulty in prolonging the length of nanowires20. Furthermore, it is generally believed that high specific surface area, fast electron transport and pronounced light-scattering capacity play salient roles in achieving high efficiency DSSC21,22.

Up to now, 1D TiO2 NW based photoelectrode has not shown significant enhancement of PCE due to low specific surface area ascribing to larger diameter and wide gaps among neighbour NWs23,24. A few recent examples concerning hierarchical TiO2 nanowires were either for rutile TiO2 on FTO glass or anatase TiO2 on the Ti foil substrate10, which were not the most ideal photoelectrode due to the rutile phase or non-transparent substrate25,26,27,28. Hence, it is highly desirable but challenging to form a hierarchical 1D anatase TiO2 nano-architecture array combining short NRs or nanoparticles on the NW surface. To date, there have been no reports on the direct fabrication of vertically aligned hierarchical anatase TiO2 NW arrays on FTO glass solely through hydrothermal process.

Here we demonstrate a facile one-step hydrothermal fabrication of hierarchical anatase TiO2 nanowire arrays consisting of long TiO2 NW trunks and short NR branches on FTO glass by immersing the FTO glass into the solution containing K2TiO(C2O4)2, diethylene glycol (DEG) and H2O. DSSCs based on such kind of novel TiO2 photoanode shows an outstanding power conversion efficiency of 7.34% accompanied by a short-circuit current density of 13.97 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage of 826 mV, and a fill factor of 0.64.

Results

Structure of hierarchically anatase TiO2 nanowire arrays

The phase purity and structure of the hydrothermal samples were characterized by XRD measurement. The diffraction peaks of the TiO2 nanoarrays on FTO glass (Fig. 1a) are consistent with the anatase phase (JCPDS card No.21-1272). Since no other secondary phases are observed, it's worth noting that the hierarchical anatase TiO2 nanowire array is obtained through the present facile one-step hydrothermal reaction of K2TiO(C2O4)2 in water and diethylene glycol (see Method Section), which is significantly different from the previous reports on the rutile TiO2 prepared from the hydrothermal preparation in the presence of HCl29.

Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns and electron microscopy images of as-prepared hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture arrays prepared by a hydrothermal reaction at 180°C for 9 h on FTO glass.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) XRD patterns of the FTO glass and the TiO2 nanostructure/FTO glass after hydrothermal reaction, which indicate that as-prepared samples were indexed as anatase. (b, c, d) SEM images show TiO2 nano-architecture array are hierarchical structure which is composed of long TiO2 NW trunk covered by large amount of short NR branches. (e) TEM images reveal hierarchical TiO2 nano-architecture arrays constituted by numerous multi-scale NRs (50–300 nm in length and approximately ~5 nm in diameter) on the surface of long TiO2 nanowire trunk (95 nm in diameter). (f) High resolution TEM image show that both TiO2 NW trunk and NR branch were confirmed as anatase single crystalline.

Figure 1b is a cross-sectional field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM image) of the synthesized TiO2 samples/FTO glass (180°C for 9 h), showing oriented TiO2 nanoarrays grown vertically on the FTO glass substrate with an average length of 18 μm. Higher magnification FESEM image (Fig. 1c and 1d) reveals the TiO2 nano-architecture arrays are hierarchical structure which is composed of long TiO2 NW trunk covered by large amount of short NR branches. Figure 1e is a typical transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image, which further illustrates the hierarchical TiO2 nano-architecture arrays constituted by an assembly of multi-scale NRs (50–300 nm in length and approximately ~5 nm in diameter) on the surface of long TiO2 nanowire trunk (95 nm in diameter). High resolution TEM image (Fig. 1f) taken from interfacial region of TiO2 NW trunk and NRs branch, displays a (101) interplanar distance of 0.35 nm for both TiO2 NW trunk and NR branch confirming the hierarchical TiO2 nano-architecture is anatase single crystalline. Moreover, the NR branch forms the multi-angle with the long growth axis of TiO2 NW. Some more HRTEM images of TiO2 NW trunk and NR branches as well as typical TEM images of as-prepared TiO2 nanostructure were shown in Supplementary Fig. S1 online. It is worth pointing out the single-crystal characteristics of the hierarchical 1D anatase TiO2 nanoarrays are believed to be crucial in high efficiency DSSCs since they could be conducive to fast electron transport and reduce the possibility of surface defect trapping derived from poor crystallization27.

Growth mechanism

To elucidate the formation of hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture arrays on FTO glass, SEM observations of time-dependent samples during different hydrothermal reaction periods (1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 h) were further performed (seen in Supplementary Fig. S2 online). Moreover, Figure 2 proposes a one-step route synthesis of the novel hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture arrays on FTO substrate. In this process, the formation of hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture arrays was intelligently assembly without template assistance. In the initial hydrothermal stage, oriented sparse 1D TiO2 NWs were formed on the FTO surface. Then, with the further prolongation of the hydrothermal reaction, the growth of TiO2 NW arrays become numerous, and short NR branches start to germinate on the surface of TiO2 NWs. Along with the increasing growth period, the branches became more numerous and longer, which could greatly enhance the filling rate in the intervals of neighbouring NWs and provide additional sites for dye adsorption. Finally, the novel hierarchical TiO2 nano-architecture arrays consisting of long TiO2 NW trunk and short TiO2 NR branches on FTO glass were successfully achieved.

Figure 2. Schematic formation process of hierarchically anatase TiO2 nano-architecture arrays on FTO glass.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The growth model shows the formation of hierarchically anatase TiO2 nano-architecture arrays was intelligently assembly and the short branches became more numerous and longer on the surface of TiO2 nanowire trunk with the prolonging reaction time.

Photovoltaic data

It is well known that 1D nanoarrays have superior electron transport and light scattering ability compared to the nanoparticles when used as photoelectrode in dye-sensitized solar cell30. And the photovoltaic performance of anatase TiO2 based DSSC is better than that of the rutile one16. Hence, it's of quite interesting to use the present hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture arrays for high-efficiency DSSC since its higher surface area compared with the bare TiO2 NW arrays ascribing from additional NR branches. Figure 3 shows the typical photocurrent density-voltage (J–V) curves and the incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra of the solar cells based on the TiO2 nanostructured films prepared at different hydrothermal reaction time (1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 h). The resultant photovoltaic parameters are summarized in Table 1. The photocurrent density (Jsc) increases from 3.54 to 12.50 mA cm−2 significantly and then slightly decreases to 12.23 mA cm−2 when the hydrothermal reaction time vary from 1 h to 12 h. The IPCE values (Fig. 3b) over the whole spectral range are in concurrence with the variations of Jsc. Among which, DSSC-9 h has the highest IPCE values (75%). The tremendous improvement of Jsc can be attributed to the following facts: Firstly, compared with smooth TiO2 NWs prepared at 1 or 2 h, the increasing roughness factor for hierarchical TiO2 nano-architecture arrays obtained at 6, 9, 12 h resulting from the additional NR branches lead to larger dye adsorption (shown in Table 1). Specifically, the amount of dye adsorption on the 9 h based hierarchical TiO2 nano-architecture arrays is 110.0 nmol cm−2, which is more than 4 times of 1 h-based TiO2 NWs. Secondly, the TiO2 NR branches on the main TiO2 NW trunk fill the intervals between neighbouring NWs, which can enhance the light-scattering effects and hence improve the light-harvesting efficiency resulting in a higher Jsc, which was confirmed by UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (shown in Supplementary Fig. S3 online), and this indicates the significant improvement of light scattering capabilities for these hierarchical TiO2 nanoarrays photoanode. Although more dye amounts and superior light scattering ability for 12 h TiO2 based DSSC, the Jsc experienced a slight decrease from12.50 (9 h based TiO2) to 12.23 mA cm−2, which can be attributed to the larger amount of surface defects and recombination centers. The photovoltage declines gradually from 878 mV (DSSC-1 h) to 779 mV (DSSC-12 h) along with the increasing growth time due to the augmentation of the numerous short TiO2 NR branches, which provides additional charge recombination sites resulting in larger recombination rate (see the following discussions of EIS, IMPS and IMVS measurement)12. Finally, DSSC based on 9 h based TiO2 (DSSC-9 h) shows a PCE of 6.74%, a Jsc value of 12.50 mA cm−2, a Voc value of 818 mV and a FF value of 0.66. The outstanding photovoltaic performance for DSSC-9 h can be understood as a result of high dye loading, superior light scattering as well as considerable charge collection efficiency due to the utilization of high quality hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture arrays.

Figure 3. Photovoltaic characteristics using as-prepared TiO2 nanowire array samples as photoelectrodes.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) J–V characteristic of DSSCs devices based on the photoelectrodes prepared at different hydrothermal reaction time measured under AM 1.5 G simulated full sunlight (100 mW cm−2) illumination. (b) IPCE spectra of DSSCs based on the photoelectrodes prepared at different hydrothermal reaction time.

Table 1. J–V characterization of the DSSCs employing 18-μm thick TiO2 films.

DSSCs Jsc/mA cm−2 Voc/mV η/% FF Adsorbed dye/nmol cm−2
1 h 3.54 878 1.92 0.62 24.0
2 h 4.49 869 2.43 0.62 28.2
3 h 5.77 856 3.02 0.61 46.5
6 h 10.88 841 5.81 0.64 76.1
9 h 12.50 818 6.74 0.66 110.0
CP-9 h 13.97 826 7.34 0.64 -
12 h 12.23 779 5.96 0.63 120.0
Open in a new tab

Charge transfer dynamics

To obtain better insight into dynamics of interfacial charge transfer process within the DSSCs, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed. Figure 4 shows the Nyquist plots of the DSSCs based on above six photoelectrodes. The second semi-cycle, corresponding to the electron recombination at the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface, shows the recombination resistance decrease with the TiO2 nanoarray photoelectrodes prepared at longer hydrothermal reaction time (from 1 h to 12 h) implying fast recombination reaction (or shorter electron lifetime) for the hierarchical TiO2 nano-architecture arrays with increasing number of short TiO2 NR branches. This may result in smaller photovoltage which is in agreement with above photovoltaic data.

Figure 4. EIS results of DSSCs based on different as-prepared samples.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Nyquist plots of the DSSCs based on different hydrothermal reaction time measured at −0.83 V bias in the dark reveal that recombination resistance decreases with the TiO2 nanoarray photoelectrodes prepared at longer hydrothermal reaction time (from 1 h to 12 h) implying fast recombination reaction (or shorter electron lifetime) for the hierarchical TiO2 nano-architecture arrays with increasing number of short TiO2 NR branches.

Intensity-modulated photocurrent spectroscopy (IMPS) and intensity-modulated photovoltage spectroscopy (IMVS) have been further employed for the characterizations of electron transport and recombination within DSSCs, which directly relate to the Jsc, Voc and η of DSSCs. The transport time (recombination time) can be derived from the IMPS (IMVS) measurements according to the equations: τd = 1/2πfd (τr = 1/2πfr), where fd (fr) is the characteristic minimum frequency of the IMPS and IMVS imaginary component31. Here, τd and τr represent electron transit time across the photoanode films and recombination with I3− in the electrolyte, respectively. Figure 5a and 5b shows the transport and recombination times of the DSSCs based on the above six photoelectrodes as a function of light intensity. The τd and τr of the six cells decrease with the increasing light intensity. Specifically, at various light intensities, the slower transport rate (τd increases) and larger recombination rate (τr decreases) were obtained for the DSSCs based on the TiO2 photoelectrode prepared at increasing hydrothermal time, which are attributed to more trapping sites and recombination centers for the hierarchical TiO2 nano-architecture arrays films derived from the increasing number of TiO2 NR branches interconnected with one another which prolong the electron transport path and hence lead to serious recombination of the DSSC. The decreasing electron lifetime (IMVS and EIS) correlates with the continuing decreased Voc. In addition, there is little experimental evidence concerning the comparison of light intensity dependence of the electron diffusion coefficient (Dn) and effective diffusion length between bare 1D TiO2 nanowire and hierarchical TiO2 nano-architecture arrays, we show here for the first time that the Dn of bare 1D TiO2 NW is much more larger than that of hierarchical TiO2 nano-architecture arrays at the same light intensity (Figure 5c, Dn = d2/(4τd)32, d is the film thickness and τd is the electron transport time). The higher Dn, the faster the photogenerated electrons can transport to the anode contact. This is because the bare 1D TiO2 NW photoanodes (1, 2 h) possess direct and fast electron transport pathway28. In contrast, hierarchical TiO2 nano-architecture arrays (3, 6, 9 or 12 h) are composed of long TiO2 NW trunk and numerous short TiO2 NR branches would have more internal defects, in which the electron could be trapped to some extent during the process of transport. The effective electron diffusion length (Ln = (Dnτr)1/2) suggest whether the injected electron can transport to external circuit which influence the Jsc and η33. Figure 5d represents the Ln of above six DSSCs are 116.8, 82.1, 68.6, 46.9, 34.5 and 28.5 μm, respectively, which much longer than the real TiO2 NW length (18 μm). This result indicates that, be it 1D TiO2 nanowire or hierarchical TiO2 nano-architecture arrays, the film thickness of them could be much thicker for a given recombination loss and further improving the PCE. Having considered all the factors above, the higher short-circuit current density and power conversion efficiency of DSSC-9 h can be mainly attributed to the higher specific surface area for adsorbing more dye molecules and superior light scattering capacity for facilitating the light-harvesting efficiency compared with DSSC-1 h as well as modest electron transport rate and recombination time when compared with DSSC-12 h sample. Hence, a PCE up to 6.74% was successfully achieved for DSSC-9 h.

Figure 5. Electron transport and recombination kinetics.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) Transport time. (b) Lifetime. (c) Electron diffusion coefficient. (d) Effective diffusion length of the DSSCs based on the photoelectrodes prepared at different hydrothermal reaction time as a function of the incident light intensity for 457 nm LED light source.

Effect of TiO2 blocking layer on photovoltaic properties

To further improve the PCE of DSSCs, a TiO2 compact layer (CP, 100 nm in thickness consisting of ~5 nm TiO2 nanoparticles) was introduced between FTO glass substrate and hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture arrays film by spin-coating ahead of the hydrothermal process. Figure 6b shows the photocurrent density-voltage (J–V) curves and the inset image is the IPCE spectrum of the complete hierarchical TiO2 nanoarrays photoanode based DSSC (Fig. 6a). It is notable that the Jsc, Voc and η of DSSC-CP-9 h is 13.97 mA cm−2, 826 mV and 7.34%, respectively, which are much superior to that of 12.50 mA cm−2, 818 mV and 6.74% for the DSSC-9 h (without TiO2 compact layer). The considerable improvement of Jsc, Voc and η by the introduction of compact TiO2 blocking layer is believed to effectively reduce the charge recombination in FTO/electrolyte interface and enhance the adhesion between hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture arrays and FTO glass surface due to the highly density and large contact area of quantum-size TiO2 nanoparticles34,35. Consequently, electron transport would become faster and thus boost the charge transfer efficiency, leading to a 9% enhancement of power conversion efficiency.

Figure 6. Schematic diagram and photovoltaic characteristics of DSSC based on hierarchical anatase TiO2 nanoarrays photoanode.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) Sandwich type model of DSSC based on hierarchical anatase TiO2 nanoarrays photoanode and platinum counter electrode. (b) J–V characterization of DSSC employing hierarchical TiO2 nanoarrays prepared at 9 h with an additional TiO2 blocking layer and the inset image is the corresponding IPCE spectrum.

Finally, in order to highlight the advantage of hierarchical TiO2 nanowire arrays compared to that of P25 nanoparticle, two photoanodes with similar dye uptakes between the P25 nanoparticle (112.2 nmol cm−2, 12 μm in thickness) and hierarchical TiO2 nanowire arrays (110.0 nmol cm−2, 18 μm in thickness) were used to prepare the DSSCs. The Jsc and Voc of P25 based DSSC are 12.01 and 794 mV, respectively, which are much lower than those of hierarchically TiO2 nanowire arrays (13.97 mA cm−2 and 826 mV), leading to a significant enhancement of efficiency for the latter (7.34%) compared with the former (6.35%). The enhanced PCE can be attributed to the superior light scattering ability for increasing light-harvesting efficiency, direct electron transit pathway for fast electron transport, longer electron lifetime due to its 1D nanostructure with less grain boundaries and defects for slow charge recombination.

Discussion

A novel hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture array consisting of long TiO2 nanowire trunk and numerous short nanorod branches (18 μm in thickness) on transparent conductive FTO glass substrate has been successfully prepared for the first time via a simple one-step hydrothermal route without any surfactant and template. The DSSC based on such hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture array photoelectrode showed an impressive power conversion efficiency of 7.34%, which is the highest value reported for the TiO2 nanowire array. The investigations of EIS, IMPS and IMVS reveal that the electron transport and recombination for hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture array are inferior to those bare TiO2 nanowires due to the additional trapping sites and recombination centres for the former. However, the significant improvement of photocurrent for the hierarchical anatase TiO2 nano-architecture array can be ascribed to its higher specific surface area for adsorbing more dye molecules and superior light scattering capacity for boosting the light-harvesting efficiency which are responsible for the improvement of the power conversion efficiency. We anticipate that the present mild synthesis of hierarchical anatase TiO2 nanoarray opens up a promising avenue for scalable fabricating high-efficiency solid-state DSSCs or quantum-dot sensitized solar cells.

Methods

Materials synthesis

0.002 mol K2TiO(C2O4)2 was added to the mixture solvent containing 30 mL diethylene glycol (DEG) and 10 mL deionized water. After stirring of 30 min, the mixture solution was transferred to a 50 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. Then cleaned FTO glass (ultrasonically for 10 min in acetone, 2-propanol and deionized water, respectively) or TiO2-coated FTO glass (a 100 nm thick TiO2 compact layer on FTO glass obtained by spin-coating of the synthesized TiO2 colloid solution36 followed by 30 min at 500°C in ambient air) were placed at an angle against the wall of the Teflon-liner with the conducting side facing down. The hydrothermal synthesis was conducted at 180°C for 1–12 h. After reaction, the autoclave was cooled to room temperature naturally and then the FTO glass was taken out and rinsed with deionized water, ethanol and then dried at room temperature.

Dye-sensitized solar cells fabrication

The as-prepared hierarchical anatase TiO2 nanoarrays on FTO glass were used as photoelectrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Prior to dye sensitization, the as-prepared TiO2 nanoarrays were immersed into a 40 mM TiCl4 aqueous solution at 70°C for 30 min and washed with water and ethanol, then sintered at 520°C for 30 min. After cooling down to 80°C, the TiO2 electrodes were putted into 0.5 mM N719 dye (Ru[LL'-(NCS)2], L = 2,2′-bipyridyl-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid, L = 2, 2′-bipyridyl-4, 4′-ditetrabutylammonium carboxylate, Solaronix Co.) in acetonitrile/tert-butanol (1:1 v/v), and kept for 20 h at room temperature. The Pt-coated FTO as a counter electrode was prepared by dropping H2PtCl6 (5 mM) solution on the FTO glass followed by heating at 400°C for 15 min in air. The electrolyte consisted of 1-propyl-3-methyl-imidazolium iodide (PMII, 0.6 M), I2 (0.03 M), LiI (0.05 M), Guanidine thiocyanate (GuNCS, 0.1 M, Aldrich), and 4-tert-butylpyridine (t-BP, 0.5 M, Aldrich) in acetonitrile and valeronitrile (85:15 v/v). The active area of the dye-coated TiO2 film was 0.16 cm2.

Characterization

The phase purity of the products was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) on a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). The Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, JSM-6330F), transmission electron microscope (TEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) were performed on a JEOL-2010 HR transmission electron microscope to characterize the morphology, size and the intrinsic structure. The diffuse reflectance spectra and absorption spectra of desorbed-dye solution from the hierarchical TiO2 nanowire arrays films (dye-absorbed TiO2 film was immersed into 0.1 M NaOH aqueous solution) were measured on a UV/Vis-NIR spectrophotometer (UV-3150) to evaluate the reflectance performance and the adsorped dye amount of TiO2 films. The current-voltage characteristics were performed using a Keithley 2400 source meter under simulated AM 1.5 G illumination (100 mW cm−2) provided by a solar light simulator (Oriel, Model: 91192). The incident light intensity was calibrated with a NREL-calibrated Si solar cell. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed with a Zennium electrochemical workstation (ZAHNER) with the frequency range from 10 mHz to 1 MHz. The magnitude of the alternative signal was 10 mV. The impedance measurements were carried out under forward bias of −0.83 V in the dark condition. Intensity-modulated photovoltage spectroscopy (IMVS) and intensity-modulated photocurrent spectroscopy (IMPS) measurements were carried out on a electrochemical workstation (Zahner, Zennium) with a frequency response analyzer under a modulated green light emitting diodes (457 nm) driven by a source supply (Zahner, PP211), which can provide both dc and ac components of the illumination. The modulated light intensity was 10% or less than the base light intensity. The frequency range was set from 100 KHz to 0.1 Hz.

Author Contributions

W.Q.W., B.X.L. and D.B.K. proposed and designed the experiments. W.Q.W. and B.X.L. carried out the synthetic experiments. H.S.R., Y.F.W. and Y.F.X. performed the HRTEM, SEM characterization and structural analysis. D.B.K. analysed the data. W.Q.W. designed and carried out the experiments, analysed the data. W.Q.W., D.B.K. and C.Y.S. wrote the manuscript. All the authors participated in discussions of the research.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information

srep01352-s1.pdf (703.3KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (20873183, U0934003), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-11-0533), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20100171110014).

References

  1. O'Regan B. & Grätzel M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 353, 737–740 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  2. Yella A. et al. Porphyrin-Sensitized Solar Cells with Cobalt (II/III)-Based Redox Electrolyte Exceed 12 Percent Efficiency. Science 334, 629–634 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Xin X., He M., Han W., Jung J. & Lin Z. Low-cost copper zinc tin sulfide counter electrodes for high-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 11739–11742 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Yum J.-H. et al. A cobalt complex redox shuttle for dye-sensitized solar cells with high open-circuit potentials. Nat Commun 3, 631 10.1038/ncomms1655 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim H.-S. et al. Lead iodide perovskite sensitized all-solid-state submicron thin film mesoscopic solar cell with efficiency exceeding 9%. Sci. Rep. 2:591, 1–7 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bierman M. J. & Jin S. Potential applications of hierarchical branching nanowires in solar energy conversion. Energ Environ. Sci. 2, 1050–1059 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  7. Hu L. H. et al. Microstructure design of nanoporous TiO2 photoelectrodes for dye-sensitized solar cell modules. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 358–362 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berger T., Lana-Villarreal T., Monllor-Satoca D. & Gomez R. An electrochemical study on the nature of trap states in nanocrystalline rutile thin films. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 9936–9942 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  9. Qu J., Li G. R. & Gao X. P. One-dimensional hierarchical titania for fast reaction kinetics of photoanode materials of dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 2003–2009 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  10. Liao J. Y., Lei B. X., Chen H. Y., Kuang D. B. & Su C. Y. Oriented hierarchical single crystalline anatase TiO2 nanowire arrays on Ti-foil substrate for efficient flexible dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 5750–5757 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  11. Liao J. Y., Lei B. X., Kuang D. B. & Su C. Y. Tri-functional hierarchical TiO2 spheres consisting of anatase nanorods and nanoparticles for high efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells. Energ Environ. Sci. 4, 4079–4085 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  12. Ohsaki Y. et al. Dye-sensitized TiO2 nanotube solar cells: fabrication and electronic characterization. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 4157–4163 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhu K., Neale N. R., Miedaner A. & Frank A. J. Enhanced charge-collection efficiencies and light scattering in dye-sensitized solar cells using oriented TiO2 nanotubes arrays. Nano Letters 7, 69–74 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feng X., Shankar K., Paulose M. & Grimes C. A. Tantalum-doped titanium dioxide nanowire arrays for dye-sensitized solar cells with high open-circuit voltage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 8095–8098 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Howard C., Sabine T. & Dickson F. Structural and thermal parameters for rutile and anatase. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B 47, 462–468 (1991). [Google Scholar]
  16. Sedach P. A. et al. Solution growth of anatase TiO2 nanowires from transparent conducting glass substrates. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 5063–5069 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang X. Y. et al. Synthesis of long TiO2 nanowire arrays with high surface areas via synergistic assembly route for highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 17531–17538 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  18. Park N. G., van de Lagemaat J. & Frank A. J. Comparison of Dye-Sensitized Rutile- and Anatase-Based TiO2 Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 8989–8994 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  19. Yu X. et al. One-step ammonia hydrothermal synthesis of single crystal anatase TiO2 nanowires for highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 2110–2117 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  20. In Su II. et al. Low temperature synthesis of transparent, vertically aligned anatase TiO2 nanowire arrays: application to dye sensitized solar cells. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 33, 1989–1992 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang Q., Chou T. P., Russo B., Jenekhe S. A. & Cao G. Aggregation of ZnO nanocrystallites for high conversion efficiency in dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 2402–2406 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Qiu Y. C., Chen W. & Yang S. H. Double-Layered Photoanodes from Variable-Size Anatase TiO2 Nanospindles: A Candidate for High-Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 3675–3679 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Roy P., Kim D., Paramasivam I. & Schmuki P. Improved efficiency of TiO2 nanotubes in dye sensitized solar cells by decoration with TiO2 nanoparticles. Electrochem. Commun. 11, 1001–1004 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  24. Wu W.-Q. et al. Dye-sensitized solar cells based on a double layered TiO2 photoanode consisting of hierarchical nanowire arrays and nanoparticles with greatly improved photovoltaic performance. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 18057–18062 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhuge F. W. et al. Toward Hierarchical TiO2 Nanotube Arrays for Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 23, 1330–1334 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang H. et al. Rutile TiO2 nano-branched arrays on FTO for dye-sensitized solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 6977–6982 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Feng X. J. et al. Vertically Aligned Single Crystal TiO2 Nanowire Arrays Grown Directly on Transparent Conducting Oxide Coated Glass: Synthesis Details and Applications. Nano Letters 8, 3781–3786 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lv M. et al. Densely aligned rutile TiO2 nanorod arrays with high surface area for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale 4, 5872–5879 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu B. & Aydil E. S. Growth of Oriented Single-Crystalline Rutile TiO2 Nanorods on Transparent Conducting Substrates for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 3985–3990 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Feng X., Zhu K., Frank A. J., Grimes C. A. & Mallouk T. E. Rapid charge transport in dye-sensitized solar cells made from vertically aligned single-crystal rutile TiO2 nanowires. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 2727–2730 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang H. X., Nicholson P. G., Peter L., Zakeeruddin S. M. & Gratzel M. Transport and Interfacial Transfer of Electrons in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Utilizing a Co(dbbip)2 Redox Shuttle. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 14300–14306 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  32. Dloczik L. et al. Dynamic response of dye-sensitized nanocrystalline solar cells: Characterization by intensity-modulated photocurrent spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 10281–10289 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  33. Jennings J. R., Ghicov A., Peter L. M., Schmuki P. & Walker A. B. Dye-sensitized solar cells based on oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: Transport, trapping, and transfer of electrons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13364–13372 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ito S. et al. Control of dark current in photoelectrochemical (TiO2/I(−) − I3(−)) and dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Commun. 4351–4353 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhu K., Schiff E. A., Park N. G., van de Lagemaat J. & Frank A. J. Determining the locus for photocarrier recombination in dye-sensitized solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 685–687 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  36. Scolan E. & Sanchez C. Synthesis and Characterization of Surface-Protected Nanocrystalline Titania Particles. Chem. Mater. 10, 3217–3223 (1998). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information

srep01352-s1.pdf (703.3KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES