Abstract
The physiological activities of organs are underpinned by an interplay between the distinct cell types they contain. However, little is known about the genetic control of patterned cell differentiation during organ development. We show that the conserved Teashirt transcription factors are decisive for the differentiation of a subset of secretory cells, stellate cells, in Drosophila melanogaster renal tubules. Teashirt controls the expression of the water channel Drip, the chloride conductance channel CLC-a and the Leukokinin receptor (LKR), all of which characterise differentiated stellate cells and are required for primary urine production and responsiveness to diuretic stimuli. Teashirt also controls a dramatic transformation in cell morphology, from cuboidal to the eponymous stellate shape, during metamorphosis. teashirt interacts with cut, which encodes a transcription factor that underlies the differentiation of the primary, principal secretory cells, establishing a reciprocal negative-feedback loop that ensures the full differentiation of both cell types. Loss of teashirt leads to ineffective urine production, failure of homeostasis and premature lethality. Stellate cell-specific expression of the teashirt paralogue tiptop, which is not normally expressed in larval or adult stellate cells, almost completely rescues teashirt loss of expression from stellate cells. We demonstrate conservation in the expression of the family of tiptop/teashirt genes in lower insects and establish conservation in the targets of Teashirt transcription factors in mouse embryonic kidney.
Keywords: Cell differentiation, Drosophila, Kidney, Malpighian tubule, Organogenesis, Tiptop/Teashirt
INTRODUCTION
Organs are assemblies of differentiated cells, arranged into distinct configurations that allow them to carry out specialised functions. Specific tasks carried out by a particular organ are emergent properties that result from the coordinated interplay of the different specialised cell types they contain. Although we have extensive understanding of the physiological activities of organs at multiple levels, we know far less about the developmental mechanisms and genetic networks that bring about physiological maturation. For example, how are physiologically distinct cell types, which differ in gene expression, shape, location and function, established during organogenesis? These are important and fundamental questions, as these processes ultimately underpin integrated function for all organs. Here, we investigate the developmental genetic networks that establish secretory function in the Drosophila melanogaster renal tubule.
The role of the excretory system of an animal is to remove harmful substances from the body and to regulate ionic, acid-base and fluid balance. In insects, the renal or Malpighian tubules (MpTs) – a set of simple epithelial tubes – carry out these activities. Studies of renal tubule physiology have provided insight into the mechanisms underlying the clearance of toxins and regulation of urine production and modification (Beyenbach et al., 2010; Dow and Davies, 2001; Dow and Davies, 2003; Maddrell, 1981; Wessing and Eichelberg, 1978). Primary urine is secreted by main segment cells, driven by ion transport across the epithelium (Fig. 1). In Drosophila two physiologically distinctive cell types drive this process: principal cells (PCs or Type I cells), and stellate cells (SCs or Type II cells). PCs transport potassium ions, establishing a favourable electrochemical gradient that allows chloride ion movement through channels in SCs; water follows by osmosis facilitated by aquaporin water channels also in SCs (Fig. 1B) (Kaufmann et al., 2005; O’Donnell et al., 1998). The volume of urine production is regulated by internal physiology and environmental conditions through haemolymph-borne hormonal signals (Coast et al., 2001; Maddrell et al., 1991; Terhzaz et al., 1999). For example, PCs are activated by both cGMP- and cAMP-mediated pathways (Cabrero et al., 2002; Johnson et al., 2005; Kean et al., 2002), whereas in SCs leucokinin acts on its receptor (LKR), which elevates the chloride conductance of SCs (Fig. 1B) (reviewed by Beyenbach et al., 2010).
The developmental origins of PCs and Type II cells differ. PCs derive from epithelial primordia that bud out from the embryonic hindgut. Type II cells originate from mesenchymal cells that integrate into the tubule epithelium during mid-embryogenesis, differentiating as SCs in the secretory region and as bar cells in the initial and transitional segments (Denholm et al., 2003) (Fig. 1A,B). SCs become spaced in a regular pattern between PCs and can be distinguished by their smaller nuclear size. teashirt (tsh), which encodes a zinc-finger transcription factor, is expressed in SCs as they integrate and is an early marker that distinguishes them from the PCs. We therefore reasoned that tsh might regulate SC differentiation. Previous reports indicate that the tsh paralogue tiptop (tio) is also expressed in embryonic fly MpTs (Laugier et al., 2005) and that a tio/tsh orthologue is expressed in the developing MpTs of the beetle Tribolium castaneum (Shippy et al., 2008), further suggesting that these genes have important conserved roles in the development and/or function of insect MpTs.
Drosophila tsh and tio are paralogous genes that encode zinc-finger transcription factors (Laugier et al., 2005). The gene pair is present in the genomes of all Drosophila species sequenced to date (Clark et al., 2007) but only as a single gene in other insects (including the closely related Dipterans Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti), suggesting a recent duplication event. Comparison of the genes among insects reveals that tio is the more ancestral gene, with tsh possessing more derived characteristics (Datta et al., 2011a; Datta et al., 2011b; Herke et al., 2005; Santos et al., 2010; Shippy et al., 2008). In the embryo, tsh promotes trunk segmental identities (Fasano et al., 1991) and contributes to the patterning of other tissues, such as the salivary glands and midgut (Henderson et al., 1999; Mathies et al., 1994). Later, tsh contributes to the specification and patterning of adult appendages, including the leg, wing and eye (Bessa et al., 2009; Bessa and Casares, 2005; Bessa et al., 2002; Erkner et al., 1999; Singh et al., 2004; Singh et al., 2002; Soanes et al., 2001; Sun et al., 1995; Wu and Cohen, 2000; Wu and Cohen, 2002). In many tissues, tio acts redundantly with tsh so that flies lacking tio function are viable without obvious phenotypes.
Vertebrate teashirt family genes (Tshz) have been identified in humans, mice, chick, zebrafish and frog (Santos et al., 2010), where they act to pattern multiple tissues during embryogenesis (Caubit et al., 2008; Caubit et al., 2010; Erickson et al., 2011; Faralli et al., 2011; Koebernick et al., 2006). Human TSHZ genes have proven or putative roles as disease loci, including juvenile angiofibroma, congenital aural atresia, congenital pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction, and breast and prostate cancers (Caubit et al., 2008; Feenstra et al., 2011; Jenkins et al., 2010; Schick et al., 2011; Yamamoto et al., 2011), although their precise roles in normal development and disease have not been established. Mouse Tshz genes are able to rescue the loss of trunk identity in Drosophila melanogaster (Manfroid et al., 2004), suggesting conservation over a wide evolutionary range.
Here, we characterise the genetic network that underpins physiological maturation in the MpTs. We find that tsh is a principal component of the SC differentiation hierarchy, controlling SC shape and the expression of genes required for terminal physiological differentiation. We show how tsh activity in SCs translates into integrated organ function and how this, in turn, influences the physiology of the whole animal, providing comprehensive insight into the function of Tsh-family transcription factors at multiple biological levels. We provide evidence that tio/tsh function in MpTs is conserved between insects separated in evolution by over 360 million years and, by extending our work to identify Tshz3 targets in the mouse kidney, reveal that some downstream components of the teashirt genetic network are shared between invertebrates and vertebrates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fly stocks
Flies were cultured on standard media at 18°C or 25°C with ectopic expression at 25°C or 29°C. The following stocks were used: UAS-tsh-RNAi P{TRiP.JF02856}attP2 (Bloomington 28022); c724-Gal4 (Sözen et al., 1997); tsh8; tioS21; Df(2L)tt, UAS-CD8-GFP; LKR protein trap [FlyTrap YD0927 (Quiñones-Coello et al., 2007)]; CtB-Gal4 (Sudarsan et al., 2002); UAS-tsh [(Datta et al., 2009), original source A. Courey, UCLA, CA, USA]. Embryos were collected on apple juice-agar plates.
Generation of tsh tio double mutant
We generated a 5 kb deficiency in tio (tioS21) (supplementary material Fig. S1) by imprecise excision of the P-element tio-Gal4A4 (Tang and Sun, 2002). We then mobilised a w+ P-element in a tioS21 mutant background and screened for potential new insertions at the tsh locus using the characteristic ‘graded-eye’ phenotype (dark red fading to white along the anterior-posterior axis). P-element rescue confirmed that one insertion (tshGE4) was in tsh (supplementary material Fig. S1). However, this line was homozygous viable with normal tsh expression. We therefore created an imprecise excision of this line to create a deficiency in tsh. Breakpoints were mapped by PCR from single homozygous mutant embryos using paired primers at ∼10 kb intervals across the entire tsh-tio locus. This compound deficiency, Df(2L)tt (supplementary material Fig. S1), removes seven protein-coding and one non-protein-coding genes between tsh and tio. We confirmed that protein expression is abolished in Df(2L)tt by staining for anti-Tsh and anti-Tio (supplementary material Fig. S1).
Tubule secretion assay
Secretion assays were performed as described previously (Dow et al., 1994) at 23-25°C using 3- to 5-day-old adult flies. cAMP and LK (Sigma) were added at a final concentration of 1 mM and 100 μm, respectively, after ∼30 and 60 minutes.
Lethal phase analysis
c724-Gal4 >tsh-RNAi (n=900) or control (c724-Gal4 alone, n=600) embryos were collected in batches of 100 and maintained at 25°C. Surviving animals were counted as: first instar hatchlings, pupae and eclosing adults.
Fly weight measurements
To measure wet-body weight, flies were anaesthetized with CO2, transferred to Eppendorf tubes on ice and weighed on a Mettler Toledo precision balance in triplicate. For dry-body weight, flies were sacrificed by freezing for 20 minutes and dried in a 50°C oven containing silica crystals for ∼24 hours and weighed again.
In situ hybridisation
In situ hybridisation was carried out using digoxigenin-labelled RNA probes to embryonic and adult tissues as described previously (Denholm et al., 2005). To make the probes, we used RE60324 (Drip) and RE62514 (ClC-a). Embryos were dehydrated and mounted in Durcupan; adult tubules were mounted directly in 50% glycerol.
Immunohistochemistry
Antibody staining was carried out under standard conditions. Larval and adult tubules were dissected in ice-cold PBS and fixed (4% paraformaldehyde/PBS) on ice for up to 30 minutes, followed by 20 minutes at room temperature. The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-Tsh (1:3000, S. Cohen, IMCB, Singapore), rat anti-Tio (1:500) (Laugier et al., 2005), mouse anti-Cut (1:200, DSHB), goat anti-GFP (1:500, Abcam) and mouse anti-Discs large (1:1000, DSHB). Appropriate biotinylated secondary antibodies were used with the Vector Elite ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories, CA, USA) for DAB staining. FITC- or Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies were used for fluorescent labelling. When required, streptavidin-conjugated FITC/Cy3 amplification was used. TOTO3 (1:100, Molecular Probes) and DAPI (1:1000, Molecular Probes) were used to stain DNA and Alexa Fluor 488/568-conjugated phalloidin (Molecular Probes) to detect actin. Tissue was mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) and viewed on a Leica SP5 confocal microscope. Post-acquisition processing was performed using ImageJ and Adobe Photoshop, and final figures were assembled in Adobe Illustrator.
Mouse ureters were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS. Immunostaining was performed on 16 μm cryosections, blocked in 10% normal donkey serum, 1% ice-cold water fish skin gelatin and 0.1% Triton X-100, prior to primary antibody incubation (overnight at 4°C, in PBS containing 0.05% Triton X-100, 1% normal donkey serum, 1% cold water fish skin gelatin and 1% DMSO) and rinsed before application of the secondary antibody. Primary antibodies used were mouse anti-smooth muscle α actin (SMaA, 1A4, Sigma; 1:1000) and rabbit anti-Aquaporin1 (AQP1, Millipore; 1:1000). Secondary antibodies used were DyLight488 and DyLight 633 (Jackson ImmunoResearch; 1:750). Sections were mounted in Prolong Gold (Invitrogen) and imaged with 25× oil immersion (NA 0.8) objectives using a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM780). Sixteen-bit images were acquired sequentially for each channel to avoid bleed-through between DAPI, DyLight488 and DyLight633. Images were analysed using ImageJ.
3D reconstruction of SCs
High-resolution images of adult SC were made (z-slice of 200 nm). Three-dimensional surface rendering was carried out using Amira software with the surfacegen function. Surface area and volumes were calculated by tracing cell outlines for each z-slice, followed by reconstruction, surface smoothing (20 iterations with a lambda value of 0.9) and calculation of surface area and volume using Amira.
Affymetrix analysis
Total RNA was isolated from ureters using TRIsure Reagent (Bioline) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The integrity of RNA was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) and RNA concentration determined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Rockland, DE). cRNAs for hybridisation to Affymetrix arrays were prepared from 100 ng total RNA using the wild-type expression kit Affymetrix (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA 95051). Labelled-cRNA was fragmented and hybridised to mouse gene 1.0 ST arrays (Affymetrix) following manufacturer’s protocols. Three independent RNA preparations from the two different conditions (wild type and mutant, embryonic stage E14.5) were processed and hybridised on Mouse Gene Arrays.
RESULTS
Teashirt and Tiptop expression in Drosophila melanogaster Malpighian tubules
Tsh expression is first detected at low levels in a subpopulation of tubule cells at embryonic stage 13 (Fig. 2A,B). Based on their position on the posterior-facing side of the tubule (Denholm et al., 2003), we identify these cells as SCs. Tsh expression increases so that by stage 16, high levels are found in the entire SC population (Fig. 2C), which persists in larval and adult SCs (Fig. 2I,J). Tsh is not expressed in PCs at any stage (Fig. 2A-C,I,J). Expression of the tsh paralogue tio is found in a subset of PCs at stages 11 to 13 (Fig. 2D,E). Tio is first detected in SCs cells at stage 13 (Fig. 2E), when its expression in PCs begins to fade. By stage 16, Tio is restricted to SCs (Fig. 2F), overlapping completely with Tsh (Fig. 2G,H). Both genes are expressed in the initial, transitional and secretory region of the main segment and therefore encompass both SCs and bar-shaped cells. tio but not tsh is expressed in the distal-most tubule cell known as the tip cell (data not shown). These dynamic patterns of tsh and tio expression are in line with previous observations, where mutually exclusive patterns at early embryonic stages give way to co-expression at later stages (Laugier et al., 2005). In contrast to tsh, tio is not expressed in third instar larval or adult tubule cells (Fig. 2K,L). The expression of tio/tsh in Malpighian tubules implies an important function for these genes during tubule development. Furthermore, the maintenance of tsh expression in SCs through larval and adult life points to a function for tsh at later stages.
tsh and tio mutants lack morphological phenotypes in the embryo
We analysed tsh and tio single mutants, and tsh tio double mutants (using a novel deficiency we have generated; supplementary material Fig. S1) but found no morphological defects in embryonic tubules. Using a tsh-independent SC marker (G447.2-Gal4) (Georgias et al., 1997), we found that the normal number of SCs was specified and integrated into the tubules, intercalating between PCs with normal spacing (supplementary material Fig. S2A-D; see rare SC clustering in supplementary material Fig. S2D). The lack of penetrant morphological defects in the tubules led us to explore roles for tio/tsh in cell differentiation and tissue physiology.
tsh is required in SCs for organ function
tio is not expressed in larval and adult tubules (Fig. 2K,L), and tio-null mutants are viable and fertile (Laugier et al., 2005). We therefore focussed on the function of tsh. Because tsh mutants die as embryos (due to extra-renal defects) (Fasano et al., 1991), we used RNAi to knock down tsh in SCs cells using the tsh-GAL4, c724 (Sözen et al., 1997), which reflects a subset of tsh expression, including SCs from late embryonic stages throughout life (c724-GAL4>UAS-tshRNAi, termed tsh knockdown). Anti-Tsh staining of adult tubules reveals complete knock down using this approach (supplementary material Fig. S3).
We compared tubule secretion in control and tsh knockdown tubules using an established in vitro assay (Dow et al., 1994; Ramsay, 1954) that measured: (1) basal secretory rates and (2) secretory rates after the addition of cAMP, an agonist that stimulates cation transport through secretory PCs, and (3) after further addition of leucokinin, an agonist that stimulates chloride flux through SCs (Fig. 1B; Fig. 3A). Basal secretory rates were significantly lower for tsh knockdown tubules than for wild type [peak secretion rates of 0.21±0.03 (s.e.m.) nl min–1, n=10 versus 0.48±0.06 nl min–1, n=9]. Addition of cAMP increased secretory rates in knockdown tubules; however, peak rates were significantly lower than wild type [0.38±0.04 (s.e.m.) nl min–1 versus 0.69±0.05 nl min–1]. By contrast, leucokinin in addition to cAMP, which doubled secretory rate in wild-type tubules, had no further stimulatory effect in knockdown tubules, with peak secretory rates remaining at 0.39±0.05 (s.e.m.) nl min–1 compared with 1.2±0.05 nl min–1 for wild-type (Fig. 3A). Compromised secretion for tsh knockdown tubules in intact animals is also suggested by the accumulation of high levels of luminal uric acid crystals that would normally be flushed away by urine flow (Fig. 3B). These data show that fluid secretion – a direct measure of tubule function – is significantly reduced in tsh knockdown tubules. We conclude that tsh activity in SCs is essential for the effective secretion of primary urine by MpTs.
tsh is required in SCs for full viability
To determine whether tsh knockdown in SCs affected whole-animal physiology, we compared viability between tsh knockdown and control (c724-Gal4 alone) flies. Embryonic and larval viability (number of eggs hatching and of larvae reaching pupation) is comparable for tsh knockdown and controls (73% versus 75% hatch and 66% versus 64% reach pupation, n=900 and 600, respectively). By contrast, only 12% of tsh knockdown animals emerge as adults compared with 56% of controls (Fig. 3C) and adult survival is strongly reduced (Fig. 3D). These data indicate that tsh in SCs is required for full viability during pupal and adult stages. As c724, although SC specific for tubules, is active in other tissues, such as the wing hinge (Soanes and Bell, 1999; Soanes et al., 2001), we cannot exclude the possibility that tsh knockdown elsewhere contributes to reduced viability.
tsh activity in SCs is required for normal fluid balance
Strikingly, tsh knockdown adults develop grossly distended abdomens within a few days of eclosion (Fig. 3E), a phenotype symptomatic of excess food intake (Al-Anzi et al., 2010), build up of internal gas or excess haemolymph volume, resulting from defective osmoregulation. We confirmed that the abdominal bloating was due to fluid retention in two ways. First, pricking submerged flies led to abdominal deflation without gas bubbles (data not shown). Second, wet weight measurements reveal that tsh knockdown adults are approximately twice as heavy as control flies, whereas dry weight measurements are equivalent, eliminating excess food intake as a cause of bloating (Fig. 3F). Together, these data show that tsh activity is required in SCs for normal organ function, which in turn is essential for fluid homeostasis.
Tsh regulates multiple features of the SC phenotype
Regulation of terminal gene expression
Next, we explored the role of tsh in SCs at the cellular level. We dismissed the simple hypothesis that a reduction in SC numbers caused the physiological defects in tsh knockdown flies; on average, each adult anterior tubule contained 34±1.5 (s.e.m.) c724-positive cells (n=12) and each posterior tubule contained 20±1 (n=10), compared with 33±1 (n=7) in each anterior and 20±1 (n=6) in each posterior tubule in wild type. Furthermore, the spacing of SCs in knockdown tubules was indistinguishable from wild type (Fig. 4A,B).
As tsh encodes a transcription factor, it could regulate the expression of genes that define SCs. We chose three candidates known to be highly expressed and/or to have well-defined activities in SCs [Leucokinin receptor (Lkr) (Radford et al., 2002); Chloride channel-a (ClC-a) (Wang et al., 2004); and the aquaporin water channel (Drip) (Kaufmann et al., 2005)] (Fig. 1B). We compared expression in wild-type versus tsh knockdown adult tubules by in situ hybridisation (for Lkr, ClC-a and Drip) and immunostaining a protein-trap line (for LKR; http://flytrap.med.yale.edu/) (Quiñones-Coello et al., 2007). In agreement with previous reports, Lkr, Drip and ClC-a are expressed in adult SCs (Fig. 4C,E,G) (Kaufmann et al., 2005; Radford et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2004). By contrast, Lkr, Drip and ClC-a expression were completely abolished on tsh knockdown in SCs (Fig. 4D,F,H). Thus, tsh plays a decisive role in SC differentiation, regulating the expression of terminal genes that are crucial for their physiological role. Failure of SC maturation will severely compromise hormone-induced fluxes of chloride ions and water and is likely to underlie the low basal secretory rates and defective diuretic response of tubules after tsh knockdown (Fig. 3A).
ClC-a is highly expressed in late embryonic SCs (Fig. 4I). To determine whether ClC-a is controlled by tsh at this stage, we examined embryos mutant for the amorphic tsh8 allele. Interestingly, ClC-a expression in SCs is unaltered in tsh8 embryos (Fig. 4J). As tio is also expressed in SCs at this stage, it might contribute to ClC-a regulation in a redundant fashion with tsh. ClC-a is still expressed in SCs in amorphic tioS21 embryos (Fig. 4K); however, in tsh tio double mutants, ClC-a expression is completely abolished (Fig. 4L), demonstrating that tsh and tio have overlapping activities in the control of gene expression in embryonic SCs.
Regulation of cell shape
In wild-type animals, stellate and bar-shaped cells undergo a dramatic morphogenetic transformation during pupation from the cuboidal shape in larvae (Fig. 2I,K) to either a stellate-shaped (main segment; Fig. 2J,L; Fig. 5A,E) or bar-shaped (initial and transitional segments; Fig. 5B) morphology in adult tubules. Strikingly, these morphogenetic transformations do not occur in tsh knockdown; cells remain cuboidal both in the main and initial/transitional regions of adult tubules (Fig. 5C,D,F). Three-dimensional surface rendering reveals the full extent of shape differences between control and tsh knockdown SCs (Fig. 5E,F). As SCs provide the main transcellular passage for chloride ions and water, their large surface area is needed to support plasma membrane-resident chloride and water channels. tsh knockdown SCs have less than half the surface area of control SCs (Fig. 5G). This reduction in SC surface area could contribute to the poor physiological performance of tsh knockdown tubules (Fig. 3A).
Together, these data show that tsh contributes to cell differentiation by regulating multiple and diverse aspects of the cell phenotype, including cell morphology and the expression of terminal differentiation genes that have crucial physiological activities in SCs.
SC expression of tio rescues tsh knockdown
We asked whether SC expression of tio rescues any of the tsh knockdown phenotypes. We analysed the expression of Drip, ClC-a and Lkr-GFP in adult tubules of animals in which tsh-RNAi and tio had been driven with c724Gal4. tio is expressed strongly in SCs of these animals whereas Tsh is undetectable (Fig. 6A). The expression of Lkr-GFP and Drip is fully restored (Fig. 6B,C), but ClC-a is only weakly expressed in a subset of SCs. (Fig. 6D). However, SCs expressing tio show a clear stellate morphology (Fig. 6A′), indicating that the cell shape change can be driven by either tio or tsh. Adults that emerge are not bloated (Fig. 6E) and viability is partially rescued; 22% of tio rescued animals eclose compared with 12% of tsh knockdown (Fig. 6F).
These results show that although tio is not required for SC differentiation, it is sufficient for multiple aspects of SC maturation. However, full differentiation of SCs, including robust expression of Clc-a, and complete rescue of lethality (Fig. 6F) is specifically dependent on tsh.
Tsh acts through a transcription factor network to control cell differentiation
In the adult tubules of wild-type flies, tsh expression is restricted to SCs, whereas cut expression is restricted to PCs, suggesting mutual antagonism between these transcription factors (Fig. 7). To test whether Tsh represses cut expression in SCs, we examined Cut expression in tsh-knockdown tubules. Although cut is not expressed in wild-type SCs (Fig. 7A,B), its expression is ectopically induced to a level found in PCs after tsh knockdown (Fig. 7C). Thus, one function of Tsh is to repress cut expression in SCs. Furthermore, ectopic expression of Tsh in PCs (CtB-Gal4 >UAS-tsh, which induces a mosaic of tsh-expressing PCs) results in loss of Cut in cells expressing tsh (Fig. 7D), suggesting that Tsh represses cut expression. As tsh and tio act redundantly in the SCs of embryonic tubules, we used the same driver to express tio in PCs. Tio is also able to repress cut, and the degree of repression is proportional to the level of Tio induced (Fig. 7E).
We next asked whether Cut normally represses tsh expression in PCs. In embryos mutant for cut, SCs are not recruited to the developing tubules (Campbell et al., 2009) and morphogenesis is defective so that PCs form a blister associated with the hindgut (Hatton-Ellis et al., 2007). These mispositioned PCs do not express tsh (Campbell et al., 2009); however, if we drive ectopic cut expression in SCs (c724 >UAS-cut) tsh is repressed (Fig. 7F). Thus, although the presence of Cut is sufficient to repress tsh expression in SCs, factors other than Cut prevent tsh expression in developing PCs. Together, these data establish a negative cross-regulatory network between cut and tsh, in which it is crucial to exclude the expression of cut in SCs and of tsh in PCs (Fig. 7K).
We asked whether the decisive role of Tsh in SC differentiation is mediated through its repression of cut. We therefore analysed whether PCs in cut mutants express SC differentiation genes and found that ClC-a is not expressed (compare Fig. 7G with Fig. 4I). We then asked whether ectopic tsh, and the consequent repression of cut, is sufficient to induce SC differentiation in PCs. In some cases, PC shape is transformed by ectopic tsh expression, leading to a more bar-shaped morphology (Fig. 7H,I) but we found no upregulation of genes normally expressed in SCs, such as LKR (Fig. 6J). These data suggest that although ectopic Tsh represses the expression of cut in PCs, loss of cut alone is not sufficient to induce SC differentiation.
Taken together, our data reveal that Tsh is a key factor in SC differentiation, acting at multiple levels that include the repression of cut (and thereby PC differentiation) and, independently, the induction of SC gene expression and morphology (Fig. 7K).
Conservation of tsh gene function
Morphologically distinct Type I and II MpT cells are widespread in insects (reviewed by Dow, 2012), suggesting that the segregation of physiological activities between different cell types is an ancient and conserved feature. To determine whether tio/tsh is expressed in Type II cells in other insect species, we chose the beetle Tribolium castaneum as a coleopteran [in which the tio/tsh orthologue is expressed in embryonic tubules (Shippy et al., 2008)] and the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus as an orthopteran representative. These species are distantly related to Drosophila melanogaster (a dipteran), sharing a common ancestor ∼280 (beetle) and 360 (cricket) million years ago. Using the Drosophila Tio antibody, we probed the pattern of expression in adult tubules and found that the tio/tsh orthologue is expressed in the tubules of both Tribolium and Gryllus in a subset of cells with smaller nuclei than their neighbours and spaced in the same way as SCs in Drosophila tubules (Fig. 8A,B). These results reveal the presence of two cell subtypes in Tribolium and Gryllus tubules, and suggest that the differentiation of one of them (putative Type II cells) is under the control of tio/tsh. Together, our data imply that the presence of physiologically distinctive Type II cells and the control of their differentiation by the tio/tsh gene family are ancestral features of insect MpTs.
We have already shown that one of the vertebrate orthologues of the tio/tsh genes, Tshz3, is expressed in the ureteric mesenchyme around the ureteric duct of embryonic mouse kidney, where it is required for the differentiation of smooth muscle (SM) cells (Caubit et al., 2008). At the onset of the myogenic programme [embryonic day (E) 14.5], Tshz3 is required in vivo for the expression of myocardin (Myocd), which enhances transcription of genes coding for smooth muscle cell contractile proteins [e.g. Smooth muscle actin alpha (SMAA) (Caubit et al., 2008)]. To characterise further the role of Tshz3 in ureteric mesenchyme cell differentiation, we performed microarray expression profiling experiments by directly comparing samples of wild-type and Tshz3–/– mutant ureters at E14.5. To identify transcripts downregulated in the SM compartment of Tshz3 mutant ureters at the onset of the myogenic programme, transcripts were ranked according to their P-value and we selected those with a P-value lower or equal to that of Smaa. The data filtering resulted in a list of 676 genes, representing 4.6% of 14,579 validated transcripts. The selected genes were tabulated in a descending order of the fold-change values. Among the 20 most downregulated genes are Myocd and several genes induced during smooth muscle differentiation [Cnn1, Myh11, Actg2, Acta2 (Sma-alpha), Transgelin (Sm22-alpha)], indicating that this approach identifies a set of Tshz3 target genes in the SM layer of the ureter (supplementary material Table S1). This set included the Aquaporin water conductance channel (AQP1) (supplementary material Table S1). As an independent experimental validation of the microarray analysis, we assessed the expression of AQP1 expression by immunofluorescence in E18.5 ureters in heterozygous control and Tshz3 mutant mice. In wild-type or control ureters, AQP1 is expressed in the stromal layer, smooth muscle layer and outer mesenchymal layers (Fig. 8C,E). However, AQP1 expression in the smooth muscle layer, where Tshz3 activity is known to be required for tissue differentiation (Caubit et al., 2008), is significantly reduced in Tshz3 mutants compared with heterozygous controls (Fig. 8D,F). Thus, the regulatory activity of Tshz3 in the mouse kidney shows parallels with the activity of tsh in insect MpTs in regulating specialised renal cell differentiation.
DISCUSSION
Together our results reveal a decisive role for teashirt in the differentiation of a physiologically distinctive cell type in the secretory region of the MpTs. tsh activity is required in Type II cells for the expression of genes that are key to their function, including chloride conductance (ClC-a), water conductance (Drip) and diuretic ligand sensitivity (Lkr). In addition, the eponymous cell shape changes that occur during pupation are abolished in the absence of tsh; SCs remain cuboidal, failing to extend arms around their PC neighbours to produce their stellate/bar shapes. Collectively, these defects in SC differentiation lead to a substantial reduction in viability, which we suggest is caused by defective excretion, as animals become bloated with fluid and the tubules fail to respond to diuretic stimuli, producing only very low levels of secreted primary urine.
Despite this prominent role for tsh in SC differentiation, it is clear that the emergence of Type II cells in the evolution of renal tubules was not dependent on the gene duplication that gave rise to tsh. Many insects with Type II cells, such as Calliphora (Berridge and Oschman, 1969), Periplaneta (Wall et al., 1975), Carausius (Taylor, 1971) and Aedes (O’Connor and Beyenbach, 2001), have only one tio/tsh family member. Furthermore, these cells have, in some cases, been shown to develop a stellate morphology in adult tubules. The function of Type II cells is not well understood in many species (see Taylor, 1971; Wessing et al., 1999), but in the mosquitoes Aedes and Anopheles, Type II cells show functional parallels with Drosophila SCs (reviewed by Beyenbach et al., 2010). Thus, aspects of the SC phenotype can develop and differentiate without the duplicated tsh gene. Our demonstration that the tio/tsh gene is expressed in a regularly spaced subset of tubule cells with small nuclei in both Tribolium and Gryllus suggests an evolutionarily conserved function for tsh-family members in Type II cell differentiation. We propose that the ancestral insect MpT contained two physiologically distinct cell types, where the differentiation of cells conducting anions and water was regulated by a Tio/Tsh-like transcription factor. We suggest that this state has been maintained in the tubules of most insects today, but in Drosophila, where a recent duplication has given rise to two paralogous genes, tsh has taken a predominant role. It will be interesting to determine whether the single tio/tsh gene is expressed in the MpTs of a wider range of insects, whether the pattern of expression correlates with the differentiation of SC-like characteristics, and whether gene knockdown results in defective Type II cell differentiation and organ physiology in these species.
Tsh acts as a transcriptional repressor in fly embryonic tissues (Alexandre et al., 1996; Andrew et al., 1994; de Zulueta et al., 1994; Fasano et al., 1991; Robertson et al., 2004; Röder et al., 1992) and in transfected mammalian cells (Waltzer et al., 2001). Correspondingly, we show that Tsh shuts down the expression of cut in SCs. Indeed, the expression of cut in neighbouring PCs depends on the exclusion of Tsh. In a reciprocal relationship, ectopic Cut represses tsh expression in SCs. Under normal conditions, this negative-feedback loop establishes two cell populations (Fig. 6A), with cut-expressing Type I cells and tsh-expressing Type II cells. Tio can also repress cut when ectopically expressed in PCs (Fig. 6E), indicating an ancestral repressive function for Tio/Tsh. We suggest that a genetic network centred around cut and tio/tsh leading to Type I and II cell differentiation is an ancient and widespread feature of insect MpT development.
However, neither transcription factor alone is sufficient for cell fate. cut acts together with Krüppel in wild-type PC differentiation (Hatton-Ellis et al., 2007) and the induction of cut in SCs does not transform them into PCs. Similarly, although ectopic Tsh in PCs represses cut expression and alters their shape, it does not produce transformation into the SC or bar-shaped cell architecture or the induction of SC-specific gene expression. Aspects of SC fate are controlled by factors other than tsh or tio; in tio tsh mutant embryos, cells integrate into the tubule epithelium (Campbell et al., 2010; Denholm et al., 2003) but simply fail to differentiate. Additionally, although all Type II cells express Tsh-driven Drip, Lkr and ClC-a (unpublished data), bar-shaped cells adopt different cell shapes and vary in their patterns of gene expression [such as c649-Gal4 in bar cells but not SCs (Sözen et al., 1997)]. These data indicate that additional regulators differentiate between bar and SCs. One candidate, Homothorax, is expressed exclusively in initial and transitional segments (unpublished data) (Kurant et al., 1998; Wang et al., 2004) and is known to act in concert with Tsh to pattern the developing adult eye, wing and leg (Azpiazu and Morata, 2000; Bessa et al., 2002; Casares and Mann, 2000).
In both mouse and possibly human kidney development tsh-family genes underlie the differentiation of ureteral smooth muscle (Caubit et al., 2008). Thus, in both vertebrate and Drosophila nephrogenesis, these genes act to direct the differentiation of recruited mesenchymal cells that contribute, albeit with different functions, to the physiological competence of the mature organ.
Here, we show that, like Drosophila Tsh, mouse Tshz3 regulates the expression of a key differentiation gene, an aquaporin channel, in a specific subset of renal cells. The kidney phenotype of Tshz3 mutant mice resembles congenital pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction, a common human kidney malformation (Caubit et al., 2008; Ek et al., 2007; Gunn et al., 1995; Ismaili et al., 2006), suggesting that Tshz3 or its targets may contribute to the human disorder. Furthermore, Tsh-family members regulate cell differentiation in multiple contexts during vertebrate development and have roles in several human diseases (Feenstra et al., 2011; Jenkins et al., 2010; Schick et al., 2011; Yamamoto et al., 2011). Further analysis of Tsh and its target genes in Drosophila MpTs may identify effectors of physiological differentiation that are relevant to vertebrate nephrogenesis and organogenesis, as well as potential candidate human disease genes.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank members of the Skaer laboratory for helpful discussions, Felix Evers for advice on 3D cell reconstruction, Simon Maddrell for help with the in vitro secretion assay, Christine Vola and Dr E. Martin for RNA sample preparation, Kathrin Saar and Sabine Schmidt for performing gene expression experiments, and Herbert Schulz for statistical analysis of the microarray and helpful discussion. We are grateful to Justin Kumar, Fernando Casares, Matt Benton and Berthold Hedwig for insect stocks and to Stephen Cohen for antibodies.
Footnotes
Funding
Research was supported by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Association Française contre les Myopathies (AFM) [12545, 13013] and Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-GENO-027-01 to L.F.]; by The Wellcome Trust [094879/A/10/Z to H.S.]; by Alliance: Franco-British Partnership Programme (H.S. and L.F.); and by Kidney Research UK [PDF1/2010 to B.D.]. Deposited in PMC for immediate release.
Competing interests statement
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material available online at http://dev.biologists.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1242/dev.088989/-/DC1
References
- Al-Anzi B., Armand E., Nagamei P., Olszewski M., Sapin V., Waters C., Zinn K., Wyman R. J., Benzer S. (2010). The leucokinin pathway and its neurons regulate meal size in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 20, 969–978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alexandre E., Graba Y., Fasano L., Gallet A., Perrin L., De Zulueta P., Pradel J., Kerridge S., Jacq B. (1996). The Drosophila teashirt homeotic protein is a DNA-binding protein and modulo, a HOM-C regulated modifier of variegation, is a likely candidate for being a direct target gene. Mech. Dev. 59, 191–204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andrew D. J., Horner M. A., Petitt M. G., Smolik S. M., Scott M. P. (1994). Setting limits on homeotic gene function: restraint of Sex combs reduced activity by teashirt and other homeotic genes. EMBO J. 13, 1132–1144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Azpiazu N., Morata G. (2000). Function and regulation of homothorax in the wing imaginal disc of Drosophila. Development 127, 2685–2693 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berridge M. J., Oschman J. L. (1969). A structural basis for fluid secretion by malpighian tubules. Tissue Cell 1, 247–272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bessa J., Casares F. (2005). Restricted teashirt expression confers eye-specific responsiveness to Dpp and Wg signals during eye specification in Drosophila. Development 132, 5011–5020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bessa J., Gebelein B., Pichaud F., Casares F., Mann R. S. (2002). Combinatorial control of Drosophila eye development by eyeless, homothorax, and teashirt. Genes Dev. 16, 2415–2427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bessa J., Carmona L., Casares F. (2009). Zinc-finger paralogues tsh and tio are functionally equivalent during imaginal development in Drosophila and maintain their expression levels through auto- and cross-negative feedback loops. Dev. Dyn. 238, 19–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beyenbach K. W., Skaer H., Dow J. A. (2010). The developmental, molecular, and transport biology of Malpighian tubules. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 351–374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cabrero P., Radford J. C., Broderick K. E., Costes L., Veenstra J. A., Spana E. P., Davies S. A., Dow J. A. (2002). The Dh gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a diuretic peptide that acts through cyclic AMP. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 3799–3807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell K., Knust E., Skaer H. (2009). Crumbs stabilises epithelial polarity during tissue remodelling. J. Cell Sci. 122, 2604–2612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell K., Casanova J., Skaer H. (2010). Mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition of intercalating cells in Drosophila renal tubules depends on polarity cues from epithelial neighbours. Mech. Dev. 127, 345–357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Casares F., Mann R. S. (2000). A dual role for homothorax in inhibiting wing blade development and specifying proximal wing identities in Drosophila. Development 127, 1499–1508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caubit X., Lye C. M., Martin E., Coré N., Long D. A., Vola C., Jenkins D., Garratt A. N., Skaer H., Woolf A. S., et al. (2008). Teashirt 3 is necessary for ureteral smooth muscle differentiation downstream of SHH and BMP4. Development 135, 3301–3310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caubit X., Thoby-Brisson M., Voituron N., Filippi P., Bévengut M., Faralli H., Zanella S., Fortin G., Hilaire G., Fasano L. (2010). Teashirt 3 regulates development of neurons involved in both respiratory rhythm and airflow control. J. Neurosci. 30, 9465–9476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark A. G., Eisen M. B., Smith D. R., Bergman C. M., Oliver B., Markow T. A., Kaufman T. C., Kellis M., Gelbart W., Iyer V. N., et al. (2007). Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny. Nature 450, 203–218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coast G. M., Webster S. G., Schegg K. M., Tobe S. S., Schooley D. A. (2001). The Drosophila melanogaster homologue of an insect calcitonin-like diuretic peptide stimulates V-ATPase activity in fruit fly Malpighian tubules. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 1795–1804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Datta R. R., Lurye J. M., Kumar J. P. (2009). Restriction of ectopic eye formation by Drosophila teashirt and tiptop to the developing antenna. Dev. Dyn. 238, 2202–2210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Datta R. R., Cruickshank T., Kumar J. P. (2011a). Differential selection within the Drosophila retinal determination network and evidence for functional divergence between paralog pairs. Evol. Dev. 13, 58–71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Datta R. R., Weasner B. P., Kumar J. P. (2011b). A dissection of the teashirt and tiptop genes reveals a novel mechanism for regulating transcription factor activity. Dev. Biol. 360, 391–402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Zulueta P., Alexandre E., Jacq B., Kerridge S. (1994). Homeotic complex and teashirt genes co-operate to establish trunk segmental identities in Drosophila. Development 120, 2287–2296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denholm B., Sudarsan V., Pasalodos-Sanchez S., Artero R., Lawrence P., Maddrell S., Baylies M., Skaer H. (2003). Dual origin of the renal tubules in Drosophila: mesodermal cells integrate and polarize to establish secretory function. Curr. Biol. 13, 1052–1057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Denholm B., Brown S., Ray R. P., Ruiz-Gómez M., Skaer H., Hombría J. C. (2005). crossveinless-c is a RhoGAP required for actin reorganisation during morphogenesis. Development 132, 2389–2400 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dow J. A. (2012). The versatile stellate cell - more than just a space-filler. J. Insect Physiol. 58, 467–472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dow J. A. T., Davies S. A. (2001). The Drosophila melanogaster Malpighian Tubule. Adv. Insect Physiol. 28, 1–83 [Google Scholar]
- Dow J. T., Davies S. A. (2003). Integrative physiology and functional genomics of epithelial function in a genetic model organism. Physiol. Rev. 83, 687–729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dow J. A., Maddrell S. H., Görtz A., Skaer N. J., Brogan S., Kaiser K. (1994). The malpighian tubules of Drosophila melanogaster: a novel phenotype for studies of fluid secretion and its control. J. Exp. Biol. 197, 421–428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ek S., Lidefeldt K. J., Varricio L. (2007). Fetal hydronephrosis; prevalence, natural history and postnatal consequences in an unselected population. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 86, 1463–1466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erickson T., Pillay L. M., Waskiewicz A. J. (2011). Zebrafish Tshz3b negatively regulates Hox function in the developing hindbrain. Genesis 49, 725–742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erkner A., Gallet A., Angelats C., Fasano L., Kerridge S. (1999). The role of Teashirt in proximal leg development in Drosophila: ectopic Teashirt expression reveals different cell behaviours in ventral and dorsal domains. Dev. Biol. 215, 221–232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faralli H., Martin E., Coré N., Liu Q. C., Filippi P., Dilworth F. J., Caubit X., Fasano L. (2011). Teashirt-3, a novel regulator of muscle differentiation, associates with BRG1-associated factor 57 (BAF57) to inhibit myogenin gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 23498–23510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fasano L., Röder L., Coré N., Alexandre E., Vola C., Jacq B., Kerridge S. (1991). The gene teashirt is required for the development of Drosophila embryonic trunk segments and encodes a protein with widely spaced zinc finger motifs. Cell 64, 63–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feenstra I., Vissers L. E., Pennings R. J., Nillessen W., Pfundt R., Kunst H. P., Admiraal R. J., Veltman J. A., van Ravenswaaij-Arts C. M., Brunner H. G., et al. (2011). Disruption of teashirt zinc finger homeobox 1 is associated with congenital aural atresia in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 89, 813–819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Georgias C., Wasser M., Hinz U. (1997). A basic-helix-loop-helix protein expressed in precursors of Drosophila longitudinal visceral muscles. Mech. Dev. 69, 115–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gunn T. R., Mora J. D., Pease P. (1995). Antenatal diagnosis of urinary tract abnormalities by ultrasonography after 28 weeks’ gestation: incidence and outcome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 172, 479–486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hatton-Ellis E., Ainsworth C., Sushama Y., Wan S., VijayRaghavan K., Skaer H. (2007). Genetic regulation of patterned tubular branching in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 169–174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henderson K. D., Isaac D. D., Andrew D. J. (1999). Cell fate specification in the Drosophila salivary gland: the integration of homeotic gene function with the DPP signaling cascade. Dev. Biol. 205, 10–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herke S. W., Serio N. V., Rogers B. T. (2005). Functional analyses of tiptop and antennapedia in the embryonic development of Oncopeltus fasciatus suggests an evolutionary pathway from ground state to insect legs. Development 132, 27–34 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ismaili K., Hall M., Piepsz A., Wissing K. M., Collier F., Schulman C., Avni F. E. (2006). Primary vesicoureteral reflux detected in neonates with a history of fetal renal pelvis dilatation: a prospective clinical and imaging study. J. Pediatr. 148, 222–227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins D., Caubit X., Dimovski A., Matevska N., Lye C. M., Cabuk F., Gucev Z., Tasic V., Fasano L., Woolf A. S. (2010). Analysis of TSHZ2 and TSHZ3 genes in congenital pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 25, 54–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson E. C., Shafer O. T., Trigg J. S., Park J., Schooley D. A., Dow J. A., Taghert P. H. (2005). A novel diuretic hormone receptor in Drosophila: evidence for conservation of CGRP signaling. J. Exp. Biol. 208, 1239–1246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaufmann N., Mathai J. C., Hill W. G., Dow J. A., Zeidel M. L., Brodsky J. L. (2005). Developmental expression and biophysical characterization of a Drosophila melanogaster aquaporin. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 289, C397–C407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kean L., Cazenave W., Costes L., Broderick K. E., Graham S., Pollock V. P., Davies S. A., Veenstra J. A., Dow J. A. (2002). Two nitridergic peptides are encoded by the gene capability in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 282, R1297–R1307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koebernick K., Kashef J., Pieler T., Wedlich D. (2006). Xenopus Teashirt1 regulates posterior identity in brain and cranial neural crest. Dev. Biol. 298, 312–326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurant E., Pai C. Y., Sharf R., Halachmi N., Sun Y. H., Salzberg A. (1998). Dorsotonals/homothorax, the Drosophila homologue of meis1, interacts with extradenticle in patterning of the embryonic PNS. Development 125, 1037–1048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laugier E., Yang Z., Fasano L., Kerridge S., Vola C. (2005). A critical role of teashirt for patterning the ventral epidermis is masked by ectopic expression of tiptop, a paralog of teashirt in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 283, 446–458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maddrell S. H. P. (1981). The functional design of the insect excretory system. J. Exp. Biol. 90, 1–15 [Google Scholar]
- Maddrell S. H., Herman W. S., Mooney R. L., Overton J. A. (1991). 5-Hydroxytryptamine: a second diuretic hormone in Rhodnius prolixus. J. Exp. Biol. 156, 557–566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manfroid I., Caubit X., Kerridge S., Fasano L. (2004). Three putative murine Teashirt orthologues specify trunk structures in Drosophila in the same way as the Drosophila teashirt gene. Development 131, 1065–1073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathies L. D., Kerridge S., Scott M. P. (1994). Role of the teashirt gene in Drosophila midgut morphogenesis: secreted proteins mediate the action of homeotic genes. Development 120, 2799–2809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Connor K. R., Beyenbach K. W. (2001). Chloride channels in apical membrane patches of stellate cells of Malpighian tubules of Aedes aegypti. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 367–378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Donnell M. J., Rheault M. R., Davies S. A., Rosay P., Harvey B. J., Maddrell S. H., Kaiser K., Dow J. A. (1998). Hormonally controlled chloride movement across Drosophila tubules is via ion channels in stellate cells. Am. J. Physiol. 274, R1039–R1049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Quiñones-Coello A. T., Petrella L. N., Ayers K., Melillo A., Mazzalupo S., Hudson A. M., Wang S., Castiblanco C., Buszczak M., Hoskins R. A., Cooley L. (2007). Exploring strategies for protein trapping in Drosophila. Genetics 175, 1089–1104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radford J. C., Davies S. A., Dow J. A. (2002). Systematic G-protein-coupled receptor analysis in Drosophila melanogaster identifies a leucokinin receptor with novel roles. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 38810–38817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramsay J. A. (1954). Active transport of water by the Malpighian tubules of the stick insect, Dixippus morosus (Orthoptera, Phasmidae). J. Exp. Biol. 31, 104–113 [Google Scholar]
- Robertson L. K., Bowling D. B., Mahaffey J. P., Imiolczyk B., Mahaffey J. W. (2004). An interactive network of zinc-finger proteins contributes to regionalization of the Drosophila embryo and establishes the domains of HOM-C protein function. Development 131, 2781–2789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Röder L., Vola C., Kerridge S. (1992). The role of the teashirt gene in trunk segmental identity in Drosophila. Development 115, 1017–1033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Santos J. S., Fonseca N. A., Vieira C. P., Vieira J., Casares F. (2010). Phylogeny of the teashirt-related zinc finger (tshz) gene family and analysis of the developmental expression of tshz2 and tshz3b in the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 239, 1010–1018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schick B., Wemmert S., Willnecker V., Dlugaiczyk J., Nicolai P., Siwiec H., Thiel C. T., Rauch A., Wendler O. (2011). Genome-wide copy number profiling using a 100K SNP array reveals novel disease-related genes BORIS and TSHZ1 in juvenile angiofibroma. Int. J. Oncol. 39, 1143–1151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shippy T. D., Tomoyasu Y., Nie W., Brown S. J., Denell R. E. (2008). Do teashirt family genes specify trunk identity? Insights from the single tiptop/teashirt homolog of Tribolium castaneum. Dev. Genes Evol. 218, 141–152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh A., Kango-Singh M., Sun Y. H. (2002). Eye suppression, a novel function of teashirt, requires Wingless signaling. Development 129, 4271–4280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh A., Kango-Singh M., Choi K. W., Sun Y. H. (2004). Dorso-ventral asymmetric functions of teashirt in Drosophila eye development depend on spatial cues provided by early DV patterning genes. Mech. Dev. 121, 365–370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soanes K. H., Bell J. B. (1999). Rediscovery and further characterization of the aeroplane (ae) wing posture mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome 42, 403–411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soanes K. H., MacKay J. O., Core N., Heslip T., Kerridge S., Bell J. B. (2001). Identification of a regulatory allele of teashirt (tsh) in Drosophila melanogaster that affects wing hinge development. An adult-specific tsh enhancer in Drosophila. Mech. Dev. 105, 145–151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sözen M. A., Armstrong J. D., Yang M., Kaiser K., Dow J. A. (1997). Functional domains are specified to single-cell resolution in a Drosophila epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 5207–5212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sudarsan V., Pasalodos-Sanchez S., Wan S., Gampel A., Skaer H. (2002). A genetic hierarchy establishes mitogenic signalling and mitotic competence in the renal tubules of Drosophila. Development 129, 935–944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun Y. H., Tsai C. J., Green M. M., Chao J. L., Yu C. T., Jaw T. J., Yeh J. Y., Bolshakov V. N. (1995). White as a reporter gene to detect transcriptional silencers specifying position-specific gene expression during Drosophila melanogaster eye development. Genetics 141, 1075–1086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang C. Y., Sun Y. H. (2002). Use of mini-white as a reporter gene to screen for GAL4 insertions with spatially restricted expression pattern in the developing eye in drosophila. Genesis 34, 39–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor H. H. (1971). The fine structure of the type 2 cells in the Malpighian tubules of the stick insect, Carausius morosus. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 122, 411–424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terhzaz S., O’Connell F. C., Pollock V. P., Kean L., Davies S. A., Veenstra J. A., Dow J. A. (1999). Isolation and characterization of a leucokinin-like peptide of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 3667–3676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wall B. J., Oschman J. L., Schmidt B. A. (1975). Morphology and function of Malpighian tubules and associated structures in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. J. Morphol. 146, 265–306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waltzer L., Vandel L., Bienz M. (2001). Teashirt is required for transcriptional repression mediated by high Wingless levels. EMBO J. 20, 137–145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J., Kean L., Yang J., Allan A. K., Davies S. A., Herzyk P., Dow J. A. (2004). Function-informed transcriptome analysis of Drosophila renal tubule. Genome Biol. 5, R69 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wessing A., Eichelberg D. (1978). Malpighian Tubules, Rectal Papillae and Excretion. London: Academic Press; [Google Scholar]
- Wessing A., Zierold K., Polenz A. (1999). Stellate cells in the Malpighian tubules of Drosophila hydei and D. melanogaster larvae (Insecta, Diptera). Zoomorphology 119, 63–71 [Google Scholar]
- Wu J., Cohen S. M. (2000). Proximal distal axis formation in the Drosophila leg: distinct functions of teashirt and homothorax in the proximal leg. Mech. Dev. 94, 47–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu J., Cohen S. M. (2002). Repression of Teashirt marks the initiation of wing development. Development 129, 2411–2418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto M., Cid E., Bru S., Yamamoto F. (2011). Rare and frequent promoter methylation, respectively, of TSHZ2 and 3 genes that are both downregulated in expression in breast and prostate cancers. PLoS ONE 6, e17149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.