Skip to main content
Cell Journal (Yakhteh) logoLink to Cell Journal (Yakhteh)
. 2011 Sep 23;13(3):131–136.

Neoplastic Bone Marrow Niche: Hematopoietic and Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Najmaldin Saki 1,2, Saeid Abroun 1,*, Majid Farshdousti Hagh 3, Farahnaz Asgharei 4
PMCID: PMC3584472  PMID: 23508881

Abstract

The neoplastic niche comprises complex interactions between multiple cell types and molecules requiring cell-cell signaling as well as local secretion. These niches are important for both the maintenance of cancer stem cells and the induction of neoplastic cells survival and proliferation. Each niche contains a population of tumor stem cells supported by a closely associated vascular bed comprising mesenchyme-derived cells and extracellular matrix. Targeting cancer stem cells and neoplastic niche may provide new therapies to eradicate tumors. Much progress has been very recently made in the understanding of the cellular and molecular interactions in the microenvironment of neoplastic niches. This review article provides an overview of the neoplastic niches in the bone marrow. In addition to highlighting recent advances in the field, we will also discuss components of the niche and their signaling pathways.

Keywords: Neoplastic Niche, Stem Cells, Bone Marrow, Cancer

Introduction

Bone marrow microenvironment contains stem cells and other cells that are supported by hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). These cells can differentiate into several cell lineages (Table 1). Osteoclasts and osteoblasts play important role in microenvironment destruction and construction(1). Osteoblasts derive from MSCs that play an important role in the construction of Osteoblastic/endosteal niches. Osteoblastic niches maintain hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in quiescence phase (2). Cancer initiating cells disrupt cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions in the bone marrow. Therefore, they can change intact niches into neoplastic niches. Therefore,the bone marrow microenvironment plays an important role in the fate determination of HSCs and MSCs in several biological process (including apoptosis, self-renewal, expansion and differentiation)(3, 4).

Table 1. Cell-derived hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells.


Hematopoietic stem cells Common lymphoid progenitor B Cells
T Cells
NK Cells
Common myeloid progenitor Granulocyte-Macrophage progenitors Granulocyte
Monocyte
Macrophage
Osteoclast
Megakaryocyte-Erythroid progenitors Megakaryocyte
Erythrocyte

Mesenchymal stem cells Chondrocyte, Osteoblast, Fibroblast, Adipocyte, Myocyte,Endothelial cells

The factors secreted in niche including chemokines, cytokines and growth factors have significant effect on the other residing cells in the bone marrow. Induced signaling by these factors can affect the fate of stem cells and other cells(5, 6). Therefore, knowing the effective mechanisms and molecules inducing neoplastic niche can help in targeted treatment of hematological diseases.

Bone marrow is the main source of MSCs (p<0.05%). MSCs are mononuclear, adhering cells having the capacity for self-renewal, supporting hematopoiesis and the ability to differentiate into several cell lineages (e.g. chondrocytes, osteoblasts, adipocytes, dopaminergic neurons, astrocytes, tenocytes and endothelial cells)(7-10). They express specific and nonspecific surface markers (Table 2).

Table 2. The CD markers of Mesenchymal stem cells.


Marker Name Chromosome Cellular expression Role Expression increased by References
CD9 Motility related protein 1 (MRP1) 12p13.3 B1, MZ, pre-B cell Cell adhesion, proliferation, motility, osteoclastogenesis, metastasis supresor, signal transduction SDF1 33
CD13 Aminopeptidase N (APN) 15q25-q26 Myeloid cells, Fibroblasts, osteoclasts, endothelial cells, BM stromal cells, Neuronals synaptic mem- branes Presenting antigens, regulatory role in T cells, angiogenesis TGFβ1, c-Maf 34
CD29 Integrin β1 10p11.2 Th17, fibroblasts, monocytes, mast cells, endothelial cells Cell-cell and cell-matrix interaction, adhesion - 34-38
CD44 H-CAM 11p13 - Cell adhesion and migration, secration and activation of MMP-2, T cell acumulation - 17,33, 34
CD49e Integrin α5 (VLA-5) 12q11-q13 T cells, B cells, monocytes Cell migration, development and survival, signal trans- duction (RTK/Ras/Erk) - 34
CD54 ICAM1 19p13.3-p13.2 Leukocytes Innate and adaptive immune, tumor cell growth arrest - 33,34
CD55 Decay-accelerating factor (DAF) 1q32 Many cell types(RBC,WBC) Inhibition of complement activation - 33
CD71 Transferrin receptor 3q29 Erythroid lineage Iron uptake, Erk-MAPK signaling - 33
CD73 5-terminal nucleotidase 6q14-q21 B cells and T cells, lymphatic vessels Prevent TRALI-induced apoptosis, suppression of pro-inflammatory process HIF-1 33, 34
CD90 Thy1 glycoprotein 11q23.3 Neurons, fibroblasts Apoptotic signaling, tumor suppression , Thy1 signaling Iron level 33, 35
CD105 Endoglin 9q33-q34.1 Endothelial cells, monocytes Angiogenesis, TGFβ/ ALK1 signaling, anti-apoptotic effect Hypoxia, TGFβ1 17, 33, 34
CD123 IL3RA Xp22.3 or Yp11.3 Plasmacytoid dendritic cells STAT5 and c-fos activation - 33
CD124 IL4R 16p12.1-p11.2 B and T cells IL4Rα signaling, immune modulation - 33
CD126 IL6R 1q21 Hepatocytes, neutrophils, monocytes/macrophage, lymphocytes Signal transduction, JAK1/ Tyk2 and Ras activation - 33
CD127 IL7R 5p13 NaÏve T cells, granulosa cells, cumulus cells, preovulatory oocytes T cell survival, upregulation of Bcl2 and Glut1 Foxo1 33
CD166 ALCAM (Activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule) 3q13.1 Neurons, T cells, monocytes - - 17, 33, 34
ASMA α-smooth muscle actin 10q23.3 - - - 34
CD271 Low affinty nerve growth factor receptor (LNGFR) 17q21-q22 - - - 39

Also other identifying markers such as D7Fib, STRO-1 and SSEA exist on MSCs (11, 12). MSCs are devoid of hematopoietic and endothelial markers (e.g. CD11b, CD14, CD31, CD45) and co-stimulatory markers (e.g. CD80 and CD81) (13). Rat MSCs express Thy-1 and c-Kit (stem cell markers), VWF (endothelial cells marker) and a-smooth muscle actin (smooth muscle cells marker) (14).

MSCs secrete several biological factors such as anti-apoptotic factors [including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and granulocyte/macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF)], immunomodulatory factors (including PGE2, TGF-β, IDO, iNOS anf LIF) and other factors including SCF, IL6, Angiopoietin-1, IL8 and SDF1/CXCL12, IL1, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) (15, 16). MSCs inhibit differentiation and activation of dendritic cells by producing PGE2, M-CSF, IL6, IL10 and TGF-β (13). Differentiation of hBMSCs into endothelial like-cells was induced in the presence of VEGF and IGF-1 (10, 17). They were also transdifferentiate into cardiomyocyte-like cells by 5-azacytidine and VEGF (18). Dexamethasone promotes the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts in vitro. Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) are expressed by MSCs. Some studies have indicated that expression of OPG and RANKL respectively, is decreased and increased in MSCs with ageing (19). HSCs and MSCs synthesize BMPs. Both BMP6 and BMP2 increase osteoblastic differentiation anddecrease differentiation of HSCs towards osteoclasts (20). Retinoid signaling may synergize with BMP9 activity in promoting the osteogenic differentiation of MPCs (21). Several studies have revealed that there is a balance between Wnt, FGFR and BMP signaling. Because BMP and Wnt signaling pathway lead to chondrocyte differentiation while EGF ends up to osteoblasts differentiation (22). Insulin like growth factor-1 plays a role in overexpression of CXCR4, leading to the enhancement of SDF-1 induced MSCs migration (10). Also IGF1 has a role in the mesenchymal and osteoprogenitor cells recruitment and proliferation (23). MSCs exhibit the capacity to promote engraftment of CD34+ UCB cells in irradiated mice, because MSCs produce some essential hematopoietic growth factors(24). MSCs secrete dickkopf-1 (DKK-1), a Wnt signaling pathway antagonist. Wnt signaling plays a vital role in both the self-renewal and differentiation of stem cells (25). DKK-1 may act as an autocrine inhibitor.

The differentiation of MSCs into osteoblastic lineage is regulated by the BMPs and Wnt signaling (26). MSCs express RUNX2, a transcription factor that is stimulated by FGFR2 signaling and is an essential transcription factor in osteoblastogenesis (27). Wnt signaling promotes the osteoblast differentiation and function. Former studies have shown that binding of FGF to FGFR2 results in the induction of Sox2 expression, and leads to blocking the osteoblastic differentiation of MSCs and Wnt signaling. This inhibition results from the interference of Sox2 with β-Catenin and numerous other Wnt target genes such as Wisp1, Wisp2, Dlx2, and msx2 (28, 29). Overexpression of miR-200a in Mesenchymal-like c666-1 cells inhibits β-Catenin signaling (30). TLR2, TLR4, NOD1 and NOD2 genes are expressed in hUCB-MSCs. Both NLRs and TLRs may be involved in the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs because some TLR and NLR agonists increase osteogenic differentiation of hUCB- MSCs (31). Transcription factors such as Cbfa1/RUNX2, Msx2, Dlx5 and SP7 are activated during the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs. Osteoblastic transcription factors induce the expression of bone-related marker genes including SPP1, COLIA1, SPARC and osteocalcin during the osteogenic differentiation (27). ERK phosphorylation is correlated with the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs (31). Notch maintains Mesenchymal precursor cells in an undifferentiated state. Notch1 overexpression under the control of the Prx1 enhancer induced Mesenchymal precursor cells proliferation and suppresses their differentiation (26). Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-λ) is a key regulator of the adipogenesis whereas hedgehog signaling inhibits adipogenesis and induces osteoblastogenesis in MSCs. IL-1, TNF-α and noncanonical Wnt signaling pathway suppress the PPAR-λ function in MSCs (32).

Hematopoietic stem cells

HSCs express markers such as CD34, CD45 and CD133 and have properties such as clonogenicity, self-renewal, and multipotentiality(40). combination of surface markers of the signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM) family(CD150+CD48CD41) was shown to be an HSC identifier (2). However, another study has recently shown that SLAM family markers do not permit the same degree of HSC enrichment in humans and rhesus macaques as in mice (41). Activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts is coordinately regulated. Osteoblasts impact osteoclasts development, which is derived from HSCs (42). Osteoclasts functions are fundamental in the HSC niche (43). The factors secreted by stromal cells (e.g. heparan sulfate) have the capacity to support HSCs (44).

Notch receptors and their ligands are involved in HSCs maintenance(45). Notch1 (N1) in the murine bone marrow progenitors increases the HSC-self-renewal and immortalization of stem cells like progenitors (46). Several studies have recently shown that osteoblasts expressing the Notch ligand Jagged1 (J1) were identified as being part of the HSC niche (47, 48). Expression of the parathyroid hormone related protein (PTHrP) receptor in osteoblasts brings about increased numbers of osteoblasts to express high levels of J1 (48). Therefore,increased number of osteoblasts is accompaniedwith an increase in the number of HSCs, resulting in Notch1 activation in HSCs and following self-renewality of HSCs (48). These results show that J1-expressing osteoblasts regulate HSCs self renewality through Notch1 activation. However,Manicini et al. showed that HSCs self-renewality and differentiation are independent of Jagged1 dependent Notch signaling (49).

Normal and neoplastic niche

Bone microenvironment consists of different cells such as stromal (osteoblasts, adipocytes, fibroblasts and endothelial cells) and non-stromal cells.Osteoclasts and osteoblasts have vital role in bone remodeling and niche structure (50, 51). Osteoblasts by expressing and secreting some molecules and factors regulate maturation and proliferation of other bone marrow resident cells, respectively.Osteoblasts regulate HSCs quiescence through the activation of Tie-2/Ang-1 signaling pathway (52).N-cadherin, a cell adhesion molecule, is expressed in both the osteoblasts and HSCs, suggesting that binding of N-cadherin induces the adhesion of HSCs to the niche cells (53). Studies have demonstrated that N-cad expression is down-regulated by reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in the release of HSCs from the niche cells. Therefore, N-cad-mediated cell adhesion has an important role in the maintaining and mobilizing of HSCs in bone marrow (54).

Osteoblasts regulate osteoclast maturation and proliferation by several factors such as RANKL (55). RANKL represents the essential osteoblastderived factor required for osteoclast formation and activation, and induces bone loss, whereas OPG blocks these effects and prevents bone resorption (56). OPG, a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily, is secreted by osteoblastic lineage cells (57), and acts as a soluble receptor antagonist for RANKL (58). The expression of RANKL and OPG by osteoblastic lineage cells is modulated by a variety of osteotropic hormones and cytokines (56).

PTH enhances osteoblast function and also increases osteoclasts activity via the PTH/PTHrP receptor-1. Strontium (Sr) enhances osteoblast activity but inhibits osteoclasts by calcium sensing receptor. Sr increases the expression of Runx2, which is an essential transcription factor for osteoblastogenesis (59).

Normally, the stem cell niche maintains a balance between the quiescence and proliferation of stem cells(60). Wnt/beta-catenin growth promoting signals are counterbalanced by BMP anti-growth signals. If the dynamic balance is egregiously altered, then the dominant signalings such as Wnt/ beta-catenin activation or loss of BMP can lead to cancer formation within the hematopoietic, epidermal and gastrointestinal systems (61-63).

VEGFR1-positive hematopoietic progenitors cells (HPCs) initiate the pre-metastatic niche cells. HPCs migrate from the niches within the bone marrow to the primary tumor neovasculature and pre-metastatic niche cells. Bone marrow-derived cells lie quiescent in the osteoblastic niche, but when activated, move to the vascular niche from where they egress and home to the periphery sites. At the primary tumor site, they are essential for stability of newly forming vessels, and at the pre- metastatic niche cells, angiogenic elements are required for the establishment of metastatic lesion. VEGFR1-positive HPC form clusters in these sites prior to the arrival of tumor cells (64).

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) in bone marrow reside in both the vascular and osteoblastic niches. In the vascular niche, cross-talk occurs between the CSCs and endothelial cells, while in the osteoblastic niche, CSCs interact with both the osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Within both niches, MSCs influence tumor growth and CSCs inhibit normal HSCs. Bone marrow microenvironment plays a primary role in the hematologic malignancy pathophysiology, and recent evidence indicates that numbers of cytokines such as leptin in multiple myeloma enhance tumor cells growth in bone marrow microenvironment (65).

Conclusion

Normal stem cells (NSCs) and CSCs are vital in tissue maintenance and malignant progression, respectively. The normal and neoplastic niches in which these cells reside play an indispensible role in NSCs and CSCs survival, proliferation, and differentiation. While the niches are each unique,there are many pathways and processes that appear to be conserved among these microenvironments. The interaction of the CSCs and the niche is a promising therapeutic target, and several drugs that affect neoplastic niche cross-talk are currently being investigated in clinical trials. Additional research is needed to further understand this complex neoplastic niche in order to fully realize the potential of this unique therapeutic target.

References

  • 1.Abroun S, Saki N. Cellular and molecular aspects of multiple myeloma. Sci J Blood Transfus Organ. 2010;7(3):183–195. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yin T, Li L. The stem cell niches in bone. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(5):1195–1201. doi: 10.1172/JCI28568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Saki N, Abroun S, Soleymani M, Kaviani S, Sadeghi B, Vaghef N. The role of myeloma cells in the in -vitro differentiation of cord blood hematopoietic stem cell to osteoclast. Modares Journal of Medical Sciences: Pathobiology. 2010;13(3):53–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Frisch BJ, Porter RL, Calvi LM. Hematopoietic niche and bone meet. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2008;2(3):211–217. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e32830d5c12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Abroun S. Chemokines in hemostasis and cancers. Yakhteh. 2008;10(39):155–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sadeghi B, Abroun S, Poupak B, Hajfathali A, Saki N, Vaghef N. The role of myeloma cells to osteoclast activation. Cell Journal (Yakhteh) 2010;12(3):357–366. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chamberlain G, Fox J, Ashton B, Middleton J. Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: their phenotype, differen- tiation capacity, immunological features, and potential for homing. Stem Cells. 2007;25(11):2739–2749. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Westerweel PE, Verhaar MC. Directing myogenic mesen- chymal stem cell differentiation. Circ Res. 2008;103(6):560–561. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.184374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nadri S, Soleimani M, Mobarra Z, Amini S. Expression of dopamine-associated genes on conjunctiva stromal-de- rived human mesenchymal stem cells . Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;377(2):423–428. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.09.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jazayeri M, Allameh A, Soleimani M, Jazayeri SH, Piryaei A, Kazemnejad S. Molecular and ultrastructural char- acterization of endothelial cells differentiated from human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Biol Int. 2008;32(10):1183–1192. doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2008.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gang EJ, Bosnakovski D, Figueiredo CA, Visser JW, Perlingeiro RC. SSEA-4 identifies mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow. Blood. 2007;109(4):1743–1751. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-010504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lin G, Liu G, Banie L, Wang G, Ning H, Lue TF, et al. Tissue Distribution of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Marker Stro-1. Stem Cells Dev. 2011;20(10):1747–1752. doi: 10.1089/scd.2010.0564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nauta AJ, Fibbe WE. Immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells. Blood. 2007;110(10):3499–3506. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-069716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang L, Chan C. Isolation and enrichment of rat mes- enchymal stem cells (MSCs) and separation of single- colony derived MSCs. J Vis Exp. 2010;37 doi: 10.3791/1852.1852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Caplan AI, Dennis DE. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J Cell Biochem. 2006;98(5):1076–1084. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Meirelles Lda S, Fontes AM, Covas DT, Caplan AL. Mechanisms involved in the therapeutic properties of mesenchymal stem cells. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2009;20(5-6):419–427. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jazayeri M, Allameh A, Soleimani M, Jazayeri SH, Kaviani S, Kazemnejad S. Capillary network formation by endothelial cells differentiated from human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Iranian Journal of Biotechnology(IJB) 2008;6(1):29–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nassiri SM, Khaki Z, Soleimani M, Ahmadi SH, Jahanzad I, Rabbani S, et al. The similar effect of transplantation of marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells with or without prior differentiation induction in experimental myocardial infarction. J Biomed Sci. 2007;14(6):745–755. doi: 10.1007/s11373-007-9188-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bielby R, Jones E, McGonagle D. The role of mesenchy- mal stem cells in maintenance and repair of bone. Injury. 2007;(38 Suppl 1):26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vukicevic S, Grgurevic L. BMP-6 and mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2009;20(5-6):441–448. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.10.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang W, Deng ZL, Chen L, Zuo GW, Luo Q, Shi Q, et al. Retinoic acids potentiate BMP9-induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells . PLoS One. 2010;5(7):e11917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Miraoui H, Marie PJ. Fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling crosstalk in skeletogenesis . Sci Signal. 2010;3(146):re9. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.3146re9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dimitriou R, Tsiridis E, Giannoudis PV. Current concepts of molecular aspects of bone healing. Injury. 2005;36(12):1392–1404. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Delalat B, Pourfathollah AA, Soleimani M, Mozdarani H, Ghaemi SR, Movassaghpour AA, et al. Isolation and ex vivo expansion of human umbilical cord blood-derived CD34+ stem cells and their cotransplantation with or with out mesenchymal stem cells. Hematology. 2009;14(3):125–132. doi: 10.1179/102453309X402250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Qiao L, XU ZL, Zhao TJ, Ye LH, Zhang XD. Dkk-1 secreted by mesenchymal stem cells inhibits growth of breast cancer cells via depression of Wnt signalling. Cancer Lett. 2008;269(1):67–77. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.04.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zanotti S, Canalis E. Notch and the skeleton. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30(4):886–896. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01285-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Valenti MT, Dalle Carbonare L, Donatelli L, Bertoldo F, Zanatta M, et al. Gene expression analysis in osteoblastic differentiation from peripheral blood mesenchymal stem cells . Bone. 2008;43(6):1084–896. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.07.252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ambrosetti D, Holmes G, Mansukhani A, Basilico C. Fibroblast growth factor signaling uses multiple mechanisms to inhibit Wnt-induced transcription in osteoblasts. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28(15):4759–4771. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01849-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mansukhani A, Ambrosetti D, Holmes G, Cornivelli L, Basilico C. Sox2 induction by FGF and FGFR2 activating mutations inhibits Wnt signaling and osteoblast differen tiation. J Cell Biol. 2005;168(7):1065–1076. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200409182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xia H, Cheung WK, Sze J, Lu G, Jiang S, Yao H, et al. miR-200a regulates epithelial-mesenchymal to stem-like transition via ZEB2 and beta-catenin signaling. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(47):36995–37004. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.133744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim HS, Shin TH, Yang SR, Seo MS, Kim DJ, Kang SK, et al. Implication of NOD1 and NOD2 for the differentiation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells derived from human umbilical cord blood. PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e15369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Takada I, Kouzmenko AP, Kato S. PPAR-gamma Signaling Crosstalk in Mesenchymal Stem Cells. PPAR Res. 2010 doi: 10.1155/2010/341671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pountos I, Corscadden D, Emery P, Giannoudis PV. Mesenchymal stem cell tissue engineering: techniques for isolation, expansion and application . Injury. 2007;(38 Suppl 4):S23–33. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(08)70006-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bickenbach JR. Isolation,characterization,and culture of epithelial stem cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;289:97–102. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-830-7:097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kestendjieva S, Kyurkchiev D, Tsvetkova G, Mehandjiev T, Jiang S, Dimitrov A, et al. Characterization of mesen- chymal stem cells isolated from the human umbilical cord. Cell Biol Int. 2008;32(7):724–732. doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2008.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ponzoni M, Arrigoni G, Gould VE, Del Curto B, Maggioni M, Scapinello A, et al. Lack of CD 29 (beta1 integrin) and CD 54 (ICAM-1) adhesion molecules in intravascular lymphomatosis . Hum Pathol. 2000;31(2):220–226. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(00)80223-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mahlknecht U, Schonbein C. Histone deacetylase inhibitor treatment downregulates VLA-4 adhesion in hematopoietic stem cells and acute myeloid leukemia blast cells. Haematologica. 2008;93(3):443–446. doi: 10.3324/haematol.11796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Boisvert M, Chetoui N, Gendron S, Aoudjit F. Alpha2beta1 integrin is the major collagen-binding integrin expressed on human Th17 cells . Eur J Immunol. 2010;40(10):2710–2719. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kuci S, Kuci Z, Kreyenberg H, Deak E, Putsch K, Huenecke S, et al. CD271 antigen defines a subset of multipotent stromal cells with immunosuppressive and lymphohematopoietic engraftment-promoting properties. Haematologica. 2010;95(4):651–659. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.015065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tarnok A, Ulrich H, Bocsi J. Phenotypes of stem cells from diverse origin. Cytometry A. 2010;77(1):6–10. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Larochelle A, Savona M, Wiggins M, Anderson S, Ichwan B, Keyvanfar K, et al. Human and rhesus macaque hemat- opoietic stem cells cannot be purified based only on SLAM family markers. Blood. 2011;117(5):1550–1554. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-212803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bethel m, Srour EF, Kacena MA. Hematopoietic cell regu- lation of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2011;9(2):96–102. doi: 10.1007/s11914-011-0048-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lymperi S, Ersek A, Ferraro F, Dazzi F, Horwood NJ. Inhibition of osteoclast function reduces hematopoietic stem cell numbers in vivo. Blood. 2011;117(5):1540–1549. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-282855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bramono DS, Rider DA, Murali S, Nurcombe V, Cool SM. The effect of human bone marrow stroma-derived heparan sulfate on the ex vivo expansion of human cord blood hematopoietic stem cells. Pharm Res. 2011;28(6):1385–1394. doi: 10.1007/s11095-010-0352-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Radtke F, Wilson A, Mancini SJ, MacDonald HR. Notch regulation of lymphocyte development and function. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(3):247–253. doi: 10.1038/ni1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Stier S, Cheng T, Dombkowski D, Carlesso N, Scadden DT. Notch1 activation increases hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal in vivo and favors lymphoid over myeloid lineage outcome. Blood. 2002;99(7):2369–2378. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.7.2369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang J, Niu C, Ye L, Huang H, He X, Tong WG, et al. Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature. 2003;425(6960):836–841. doi: 10.1038/nature02041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Calvi LM, Adams GB, Weibrecht KW, Weber JM, Olson DP, Knight MC, et al. Osteoblastic cells regulate the hae- matopoietic stem cell niche. Nature. 2003;425(6960):841–846. doi: 10.1038/nature02040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mancini SJ, Mantei N, Dumortier A, Suter U, MacDonald HR, Radtke F. Jagged1-dependent Notch signaling is dispensable for hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Blood. 2005;105(6):2340–2342. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-08-3207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Dazzi F, Ramasamy R, Glennie S, Jones SP, Roberts I. The role of mesenchymal stem cells in haemopoiesis. Blood Rev. 2006;20(3):161–171. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2005.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Roodman GD. Regulation of osteoclast differentiation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1068:100–109. doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Arai F, Hirao A, Ohmura M, Sato H, Matsuoka S, Takubo K, et al. Tie2/angiopoietin-1 signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence in the bone marrow niche. Cell. 2004;118(2):149–161. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kiel MJ, Radice GL, Morrison SJ. Lack of evidence that hematopoietic stem cells depend on N-cadherin-mediated adhesion to osteoblasts for their maintenance. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1(2):204–217. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hosokawa K, Arai F, Yoshihara H, Nakamura Y, Gomei Y, Iwasaki H, et al. Function of oxidative stress in the regula- tion of hematopoietic stem cell-niche interaction . Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;363(3):578–583. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Jimi E, Matsuzaki K, Tsurukai T, Itoh K, et al. Osteoblasts/stromal cells stimulate osteoclast activation through expression of osteoclast differentiation factor/RANKL but not macrophage colony-stimulating factor: receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand . Bone. 1999;25(5):517–523. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00210-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Teitelbaum SL. Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science. 2000;289(5484):1504–1508. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5484.1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Simonet WS, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, Kelley M, Chang MS, Luthy R, et al. Osteoprotegerin: a novel secretedpro- tein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell. 1997;89(2):309–319. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80209-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, Kelley MJ, Dunstan CR, Burgess T, et al. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation . Cell. 1998;93(2):165–176. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81569-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lymperi S, Horwood N, Marley S, Gordon MY, Cope AP, Dazzi F. Strontium can increase some osteoblasts without increasing hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2008;111(3):1173–1181. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-082800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Li L, Neaves WB. Normal stem cells andcancer stem cells: the niche matters. Cancer Res. 2006;66(9):4553–4557. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Haramis AP, Begthel H, van den Born M, van ES J, Jonkheer S, Offerhaus GJ, et al. De novo crypt formation and juvenile polyposis on BMP inhibition in mouse intestine. Science. 2004;303(5664):1684–1686. doi: 10.1126/science.1093587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.He XC, Zhang J, Tong WG, Tawfik O, Ross J, Scoville DH, et al. BMP signaling inhibits intestinal stem cell self-renewal through suppression of Wnt-beta-catenin signaling. Nat Genet. 2004;36(10):1117–1121. doi: 10.1038/ng1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jamieson CH, Ailles LE, Dylla SJ, Muijtjens M, Jones C, Zehnder JL, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage progenitors as candidate leukemic stem cells in blast-crisis CML. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(7):657–667. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kaplan RN, Riba RD, Zacharoulis S, Bramley AH, Vincent L, Costa C, et al. VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the premetastatic niche. Nature. 2005;438(7069):820–827. doi: 10.1038/nature04186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Vaghef N, Abroun S, Kaviani S, Alimoghadam K, Rostami S, Sadeghi B, et al. The role of Leptin in pathophysiology of myeloma cells. Cell Journal (Yakhteh) 2010;12(3):319–328. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cell Journal (Yakhteh) are provided here courtesy of Royan Institute

RESOURCES