Skip to main content
Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation logoLink to Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
. 2012 Fall;18(4):300–305. doi: 10.1310/sci1804-300

Guideline-Recommended Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury

Charlesnika T Evans PhD, MPH 1–,2,3, Frances M Weaver PhD 1,2,4, Thea J Rogers MPH 1,2, Lauren Rapacki MS 1,2, Scott Miskevics BS 1,2, Bridget Hahm MA, MPH 5, Bridget Smith PhD 1,2,4, Sherri L LaVela MPH, MBA 1–,3, Barry Goldstein MD, PhD 6,7, Stephen P Burns MD 6,7
PMCID: PMC3584786  PMID: 23459590

Abstract

Background:

Pneumonia is a leading cause of death in persons with spinal cord injuries and disorders (SCI/D), but little is known about guideline-based management for this disease in persons with SCI/D.

Objectives:

The goal of this study was to describe guideline-based medical care for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in veterans with SCI/D. Methods: A retrospective medical record review was conducted at 7 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers where veterans with SCI/D and CAP between 2005 and 2008 were included. Outcomes assessed were receipt of blood or sputum culture, antibiotic timeliness, appropriateness of empiric antibiotic treatment, and vaccination.

Results:

In 70 patients, 77 CAP episodes occurred and 83.1% were treated in the inpatient setting. The average age was 70.0 years and 64.9% had tetraplegia. Sputum culture was completed in 24.7% and blood culture in 59.7% of cases. Of inpatients, 79.7% had antibiotic treatment within 8 hours and 45.1% received guideline-recommended empirical antibiotics. More than 90% of inpatients received antibiotic treatment within 3 days of presentation and 78.1% received recommended treatment. The rates of pneumococcal pneumonia (89.9%) and influenza (79.7%) vaccinations were high in CAP cases.

Conclusions:

Diagnostic testing and early guideline-recommended treatment is variable in veterans with SCI/D and CAP. However vaccination against influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia is high. Specific guidelines for management of CAP in SCI/D patients may be needed, which reflect the unique risk factors and needs of this population. These data can be used as a benchmark for improvements in care processes for treating and managing CAP in persons with SCI/D.

Keywords: antibiotics, disease management, pneumonia, practice guideline, spinal cord injuries


Individuals with spinal cord injuries and disorders (SCI/D) are at increased risk for pneumonia and for death secondary to pneumonia. Weakness of the respiratory muscles, particularly the expiratory intercostals and abdominal muscles,1 causes an ineffective cough and difficulty clearing bronchial secretions, which likely contributes to pneumonia incidence and case fatality. Data from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) have shown that outpatient visits for pneumonia account for nearly 30% of all respiratory visits to the VA health care system, and the rate of pneumonia visits for veterans with SCI/D is more than double what is seen in the general veteran population.2 Pneumonia is the leading cause of death during all postinjury time periods through 30 years after SCI, ranging from 18.9% during the first year to 12.7% after the first postinjury year.3,4 According to most recent reports, the leading cause of death in 2010 was diseases of the respiratory system, with pneumonia accounting for 67.4% of respiratory deaths.5

Strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in general remain controversial. The utility of the Gram stain and a culture of expectorated sputum to establish microbiologic diagnosis and guide antimicrobial therapy for cases of CAP are debated due to the difficulty in procuring an adequate sputum sample and the variable sensitivity of the test. The American Thoracic Society (ATS)6 and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) 7,8 published conflicting clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on the routine use of Gram stain and sputum culture for patients hospitalized with CAP. Their most recent joint CPG9 discusses these discrepancies and provides further description on when microbiologic testing should be conducted; however, the overall recommendations are focused on avoiding inappropriate use of antibiotics to reduce the likelihood of selection for resistant bacteria. This is particularly important in persons with SCI/D, because of their increased risk for infection and frequent antibiotic use, leading to increased risk for harboring resistant pathogens.10 It is also recommended that persons 50 years and older receive an annual influenza vaccination and persons age 65 and older or with certain conditions receive a pneumococcal vaccination.9,11 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also recommends that persons with SCI receive the influenza vaccination.12,13 The VA cares for approximately 35,000 veterans with SCI/D and is the largest single source of care in the United States for individuals who have SCI/D. The objective of this study was to describe guideline-based management of CAP in veterans with SCI/D.

Methods

Study design and setting

This was a retrospective medical record review of veterans with SCI/D who received care during a 12-month period between 2005 and 2008 at 1 of 7 VA medical centers located across the country. This study was approved by the local institutional review boards of each participating site.

Study sample

Veterans with SCI/D receiving care at the 7 study sites were identified using an ongoing registry maintained by the VA Allocation Resource Center (ARC), which uses complexity of the patient population to allocate resources to VA medical centers. This research was part of a larger multi-objective study that focused on multiple respiratory conditions and diagnoses (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], sleep apnea, smokers) in addition to CAP.14 Medical record reviews were conducted on 607 subjects with these conditions based on ICD-9 codes using the VA Medical Inpatient and Outpatient SAS datasets.

Data collection

The chart review tool was created by an expert panel of SCI/D health care professionals and was pilot tested and modified. Study personnel were trained on the chart abstraction protocol until there was agreement in more than 80% of elements. The medical record review included information on patient demographics (race, age, marital status), injury characteristics (extent, level, duration), comorbid diagnoses (pressure ulcer, COPD, diabetes, myocardial infarction, cancer, dementia, gastric ulcer, and renal, vascular, or liver conditions), presenting complaints (cough, fever, shortness of breath, increased sputum, difficulty breathing, chest pain, chest congestion, altered mental status), and vital signs at time of presentation (temperature, pulse, respiratory rate), which were available for more than 95% of pneumonia episodes. We also recorded the receipt and timing of microbiology testing and antibiotic administration and death during hospitalization.

The key process measures assessed were receipt of diagnostic tests at presentation to the medical center (sputum culture or blood culture within 24 hours of presentation and prior to receipt of antibiotics), antibiotic treatment within 3 days of presentation, antibiotic timeliness for inpatients (receipt within 8 hours or 24 hours), appropriateness of empiric antibiotic treatment defined as receiving any IDSA CPG-recommended antibiotic,79 and vaccination against influenza in the previous year or pneumococcal pneumonia at any time. We also recorded instances when microbiology testing and antibiotics were received but did not meet the specified timeliness criteria. We assessed in-hospital death as an outcome.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were descriptive and comparisons were made between receipt of guideline-recommended care by treatment setting (inpatient vs outpatient). Categorical variables were assessed using Fisher’s exact tests. All analyses were conducted using SAS software version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina).

Results

Demographics, medical characteristics, and presenting symptoms

A total of 108 subjects with pneumonia diagnoses were identified. Based on findings in the medical record, 13 cases were excluded because onset of pneumonia occurred during hospitalization (ie, met criteria for hospital-acquired pneumonia, not CAP), 11 cases were follow-up visits for a previous diagnosis of pneumonia, and 7 were excluded because they did not have a chest x-ray and thus lacked confirmation of the pneumonia diagnosis. The final sample included 77 episodes of CAP occurring in 70 patients, where 10 (14.3 %) patients had more than one CAP episode. Most (83.1%) episodes were treated as inpatients with a median length of hospitalization of 13 days (interquartile range [IQR], 4-37 days). In-hospital mortality was 7.8% (5 of 64 inpatient cases). Table 1 describes basic demographics, medical characteristics, presenting complaints, and vital signs. The average age was 70.0 years, and 65.0% had tetraplegia. Nearly all patients had one or more comorbidities documented within 1 year of the time of pneumonia diagnosis. The most common presenting complaints were cough, fever, and shortness of breath. Approximately one-quarter (23.4%) had documented altered mental status by at least the first day after presentation with symptoms. Elevated white blood cell count and fever (>38°C) were seen in 49% and 8% of cases with documentation, respectively. There were 7 (9%) patients with a systolic blood pressure less than 50 mm Hg and 9 (11.7%) with a diastolic blood pressure greater than 160 mm Hg.

Table 1.

Demographics, medical characteristics, and presenting complaints of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) cases (n=77)

Variable n (%)
Race
  White 58 (75.3)
  Non-white 15 (19.5)
  Unknown 4 (5.2)
Age, years
  <50 7 (9.1)
  50-64 51 (66.2)
  65+ 19 (24.7)
Marital status
  Married 33 (42.9)
  Not married 42 (54.5)
  Unknown 2 (2.6)
Extent of SCI
  Complete 35 (45.5)
  Incomplete 31 (40.3)
  Unknown 11 (14.3)
SCI level
  Paraplegia 25 (32.4)
  Tetraplegia 50 (65.0)
  Unknown 2 (2.6)
Duration of SCI, years
  0-10 18 (23.4)
  11-20 13 (16.9)
  21-30 17 (22.0)
  31+ 25 (32.5)
  Unknown 4 (5.2%)
Comorbidities (documented within 1 year of CAP event)
  Any comorbidity 69 (89.6)
  Pressure ulcer 43 (55.8)
  COPD 36 (46.7)
  Diabetes and complications 24 (31.2)
  Myocardial 20 (26.0)
  Cancer 9 (11.7)
  Vascular 5 (6.5)
  Renal 5 (6.5)
  Liver 2 (2.6)
  Gastric ulcer 1 (1.3)
  Dementia 1 (1.3)
Complaints
  Cough 47 (61.0)
  Fever 39 (50.7)
  Shortness of breath 32 (41.6)
  Increased sputum 23 (30)
  Difficulty breathing 13 (16.9)
  Chest pain 11 (14.3)
  Chest congestion 6 (7.8)
Vitals Mean (SD)
  Temperature (n=74) 98.3 (1.9)
  Pulse 86.0 (17.0)
  Respiratory rate (n=71) 21.4 (8.5)
  Blood pressure (n=74)
  Systolic 69 (17.0)
  Diastolic 122 (31.3)
Pulse oxygen (n=58) 93.7 (4.5)
O2 saturation (n=11) 92.7 (2.8)

Note: COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Diagnostic testing, antibiotic treatment process measures, and vaccinations

Table 2 presents, by treatment setting, the process measures for diagnostic testing, antibiotic treatment, and vaccination. Over half (59.7%) of patients had blood cultures conducted when they presented with symptoms, whereas only 24.7% had sputum cultures taken. For inpatients, almost two-thirds (79.7%) received antibiotic treatment within 8 hours, but only 35.9% received IDSA guideline-recommended empiric antibiotic treatment. The percentages did not change dramatically by 24 hours; but by 3 days, 95.3% had received antibiotic treatment and 78.1% received guideline-recommended empiric treatment. Guideline-recommended treatment was not met primarily for inpatients due to the prescription of a cephalosporin without a macrolide. For cases treated in the outpatient setting, 92.3% received antibiotic treatment within 3 days of presentation and all of those with treatment received guideline-recommended empiric treatment (Table 2). Receipt of both influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia vaccinations was high in this sample.

Table 2.

Diagnostic testing and treatment process measures for community-acquired pneumonia cases by treatment setting

Numbeer (%) receiving test or treatment
Process measure Inpatient (n=64) Outpatient (n=13) Total (N=77)
Sputum culture 17 (26.6) 2 (15.4) 19 (24.7)
Sputum culture prior to antibiotic treatment 3 (4.7) 1 (7.7) 4 (5.2)
Blood culture 44 (68.8) 2 (15.4) 46 (59.7)
Blood culture prior to antibiotic treatment 10 (23.4) 0 (0) 10 (19.5)
Antibiotic treatment within 8 hours 51 (79.7) N/A N/A
Antibiotic treatment within 24 hours 54 (84.4) N/A N/A
Antibiotic treatment within 3 days 61 (95.3) 12 (92.3) 73 (94.8)
IDSA appropriate treatment within 8 hours 23 (35.9) N/A N/A
IDSA appropriate treatment within 24 hours 26 (40.6) N/A N/A
IDSA appropriate treatment within 3 days 50 (78.1) 12 (92.3) 62 (80.5)
Pneumococcal vaccinationa 49 (87.5) 13 (100) 62 (89.9)
Influenza vaccinationa 44 (78.6) 11 (84.6) 55 (79.7)

Note: IDSA = Infectious Diseases Society of America.

a

Those who expired while in the hospital or had a hospital stay longer than 120 days were excluded from the analysis.

Those who received IDSA guideline-recommended antibiotics within 24 hours were more likely to have had sputum and blood cultures performed (P = .01 and P = .003, respectively). When cultures were obtained, they preceded administration of antibiotics for only 5.2% of sputum cultures and 16.9% of blood cultures.

Discussion

Management for CAP in veterans with SCI/D varies, particularly in use of blood and sputum cultures for diagnosis and management. An earlier study showed that sputum culture was conducted in 46.9% of inpatient CAP cases and 11.1% of outpatient cases.15 In this study, which included some of the same VA study sites, only 26.6% of inpatients and 15.4% of outpatients had sputum cultures conducted. This difference may be due to study sites as well as the study time period. Because of impaired cough strength, obtaining an adequate expectorated sputum specimen for culture is likely a primary barrier to utilization of this test. When either blood or sputum cultures were obtained, most commonly it occurred after, not prior to, the administration of antibiotics. Timeliness of antibiotic administration is likely of greater importance; over three-quarters of inpatients received antibiotic treatment within 8 hours and nearly all had received it within 3 days.

Burns et al15 found that nearly all outpatients received antibiotic coverage that met the IDSA criteria, while only about half the inpatients received antibiotics recommended by the guidelines. Our findings showed similar results for outpatients, where 92.3% of these CAP cases received guideline-recommended treatment. Our data also suggest that there has been improvement in use of recommended treatment in inpatients, where three-quarters of inpatient CAP cases received guideline-recommended treatment. Although our study comprised more study sites than the Burns study, it may reflect improvements in treatment practice and variability in treatment practice across facilities.

Clinical guidelines recommend that patients should be screened for pneumococcal and influenza vaccination prior to their discharge and receive subsequent inoculation if needed. Jha et al16 reported that 70% of all veterans received influenza vaccinations and 84.5% ever received pneumococcal vaccination in 2003. In the current study, about 80% of the patients were vaccinated for influenza and nearly 90% had been vaccinated against pneumococcal pneumonia. Other studies have also found high rates of influenza vaccination in veterans with SCI/D (63% in 2002-2003, 67% in 2003-2004, and 72% in 2004-2005).14,17 During 2008-2010, influenza vaccination ranged between 77% and 80% and pneumococcal vaccination ranged between 93% and 97% in veterans with SCI/D (VA External Peer Review Program). Vaccination in this population is important; there are a number of factors that predispose these patients to contracting respiratory infections. Previous research in the SCI/D population has found that intervention efforts have been successful in increasing vaccination rates.14,18 The effects of this earlier work appear to be sustained.

Mortality (7.8% of hospitalized episodes) was similar to our previous report that involved some of the same centers. As noted elsewhere, this is substantially higher than the overall (inpatients and outpatients) 1.5% to 2.3% case fatality rate for pneumonia in the US population.19 However, in this study we did not determine what proportion of the mortality was directly attributable to pneumonia versus other comorbidities.

There were several limitations of this study. We could not determine whether CAP was unrecognized at presentation. When CAP is diagnosed at a later time point in hospitalization such as 24 hours later, it is impossible to meet criteria such as antibiotic timeliness, and that criterion would normally not be applied as a performance measure. However, we only included CAP cases with a chest x-ray conducted at presentation to address this potential limitation. In addition, the CAP guidelines used for this study have not been validated in this patient population and may not address the needs of those with impaired neurological systems; however, it is likely that timeliness of antibiotics is of similar importance as reported as in the general population. There is also a high prevalence of risk factors for health care–associated pneumonia in persons with SCI/D, which could have altered clinicians’ initial choice of empiric antibiotics; for this study, we did not assess those risk factors and adjust the criteria for appropriate empiric antibiotics accordingly. Study findings primarily reflect performance at designated VA SCI centers, although we included one VA SCI clinic that may not be representative of care received by non-veterans or when treatment occurs at hospitals without SCI centers. We did not determine whether the care was provided through the hospitals’ SCI service (separate ward and clinic, staffed primarily by physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians) or by internal medicine and other subspecialty services. In addition to physician training, the timeliness of lab and pharmacy services may vary across these treatment settings. Finally, as these data spanned several years, performance measures changed over time and therefore may have affected practice.

Conclusions

Diagnosis of CAP in this vulnerable population is complex. Vaccination against influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia is high, but diagnostic testing and early IDSA guideline-recommended treatment is variable. Guidelines for management of CAP in SCI/D patients may be needed, where modifications could be considered for this unique population. These data provide benchmark information for improving the management of CAP in persons with SCI/D.

Acknowledgments

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs. This study was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research and Development Service, Service-Directed Research grant SCS 03-216. There are no potential conflicts of interest with any authors.

References

  • 1.DiMarco AF, Kowalski KE, Geertman RT, Hromyak DR. Lower thoracic spinal cord stimulation to restore cough in patients with spinal cord injury: results of a National Institutes of Health-sponsored clinical trial. Part I: methodology and effectiveness of expiratory muscle activation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(5):717–725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Smith BM, Evans CT, Kurichi JE, Weaver FM, Patel N, Burns SP. Acute respiratory tract infection visits of veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders: rates, trends, and risk factors. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30(4):355–361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ragnarsson KT, Hall KM, Wilmot CB, et al. Management of pulmonary, cardiovascular and metabolic conditions after spinal cord injury In: Stover SL, Delisa JA, Whiteneck GG, eds. Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Outcomes for the Model Systems. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen; 1995:79–99 [Google Scholar]
  • 4.DeVivo MJ, Krause JS, Lammertse DP. Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(11):1411–1419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, University of Alabama, Birmingham. Facts & stats: spinal cord injuries facts and figures at a glance. February2011. http://www.spinalcord.uab.edu/
  • 6.Niederman MS. Guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia. Current recommendations and antibiotic selection issues. Med Clin North Am. 2001;85(6):1493–1509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bartlett JG, Dowell SF, Mandell LA, File TM, Jr, Musher DM, Fine MJ. Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31(2):347–382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mandell LA, Bartlett JG, Dowell SF, File TM, Jr, Musher DM, Whitney C; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37(11):1405–1433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(suppl 2):S27–72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Evans CT, LaVela SL, Weaver FM, et al. Epidemiology of hospital-acquired infections in veterans with spinal cord injury and disorder. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(3):234–242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Freed GL, et al; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Immunization programs for infants, children, adolescents, and adults: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(6):817–840 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Prevention and Control of Influenza Recommendations and Reports (no. RR-8. Vol 54). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA: July 29. 2005. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr5408 pdf. Accessed April 30, 2012.
  • 13.Goldstein B, Weaver FM, Hammond MC. New CDC recommendations: annual influenza vaccination recommended for individuals with spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Cord Med. 2005;28(5):383–384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Weaver FM, Smith B, LaVela SL, et al. Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates in veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30(1):10–19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Burns SP, Weaver FM, Parada JP, et al. Management of community-acquired pneumonia in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2004;42(8):450–458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jha AK, Wright SM, Perlin JB. Performance measures, vaccinations, and pneumonia rates among high-risk patients in Veterans Administration health care. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(12):2167–2172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Evans CT, LaVela SL, Smith B, Wallace C, Goldstein B, Weaver FM. Response to the 2004-2005 influenza vaccine shortage in veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders and their providers. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30(1):20–26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.LaVela SL, Cameron KA, Priebe M, Weaver FM. Development and testing of a vaccination message targeted to persons with spinal cord injuries and disorders. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(1):44–52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Burns SP. Acute respiratory infections in persons with spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2007;18(2):203–216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation are provided here courtesy of American Spinal Injury Association

RESOURCES