Skip to main content
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1994 Apr;14(4):2755–2766. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.4.2755

The DNA-binding specificity of the hepatocyte nuclear factor 3/forkhead domain is influenced by amino-acid residues adjacent to the recognition helix.

D G Overdier 1, A Porcella 1, R H Costa 1
PMCID: PMC358641  PMID: 8139574

Abstract

Three distinct hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 (HNF-3) proteins (HNF-3 alpha, -3 beta, and -3 gamma) are known to regulate the transcription of liver-specific genes. The HNF-3 proteins bind to DNA as a monomer through a modified helix-turn-helix, known as the winged helix motif, which is also utilized by a number of developmental regulators, including the Drosophila homeotic forkhead (fkh) protein. We have previously described the isolation, from rodent tissue, of an extensive family of tissue-specific HNF-3/fkh homolog (HFH) genes sharing homology in their winged helix motifs. In this report, we have determined the preferred DNA-binding consensus sequence for the HNF-3 beta protein as well as for two divergent family members, HFH-1 and HFH-2. We show that these HNF-3/fkh proteins bind to distinct DNA sites and that the specificity of protein recognition is dependent on subtle nucleotide alterations in the site. The HNF-3, HFH-1, and HFH-2 consensus binding sequences were also used to search DNA regulatory regions to identify potential target genes. Furthermore, an analysis of the DNA-binding properties of a series of HFH-1/HNF-3 beta protein chimeras has allowed us to identify a 20-amino-acid region, located adjacent to the DNA recognition helix, which contributes to DNA-binding specificity. These sequences are not involved in base-specific contacts and include residues which diverge within the HNF-3/fkh family. Replacement of this 20-amino-acid region in HNF-3 beta with corresponding residues from HFH-1 enabled the HNF-3 beta recognition helix to bind only HFH-1-specific DNA-binding sites. We propose a model in which this 20-amino-acid flanking region influences the DNA-binding properties of the recognition helix.

Full text

PDF
2755

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blackwell T. K., Weintraub H. Differences and similarities in DNA-binding preferences of MyoD and E2A protein complexes revealed by binding site selection. Science. 1990 Nov 23;250(4984):1104–1110. doi: 10.1126/science.2174572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blank V., Kourilsky P., Israël A. NF-kappa B and related proteins: Rel/dorsal homologies meet ankyrin-like repeats. Trends Biochem Sci. 1992 Apr;17(4):135–140. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(92)90321-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brooks A. R., Blackhart B. D., Haubold K., Levy-Wilson B. Characterization of tissue-specific enhancer elements in the second intron of the human apolipoprotein B gene. J Biol Chem. 1991 Apr 25;266(12):7848–7859. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Catron K. M., Iler N., Abate C. Nucleotides flanking a conserved TAAT core dictate the DNA binding specificity of three murine homeodomain proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;13(4):2354–2365. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.4.2354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark K. L., Halay E. D., Lai E., Burley S. K. Co-crystal structure of the HNF-3/fork head DNA-recognition motif resembles histone H5. Nature. 1993 Jul 29;364(6436):412–420. doi: 10.1038/364412a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clevidence D. E., Overdier D. G., Tao W., Qian X., Pani L., Lai E., Costa R. H. Identification of nine tissue-specific transcription factors of the hepatocyte nuclear factor 3/forkhead DNA-binding-domain family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 1;90(9):3948–3952. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.9.3948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Costa R. H., Grayson D. R., Darnell J. E., Jr Multiple hepatocyte-enriched nuclear factors function in the regulation of transthyretin and alpha 1-antitrypsin genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Apr;9(4):1415–1425. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.4.1415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dirksen M. L., Jamrich M. A novel, activin-inducible, blastopore lip-specific gene of Xenopus laevis contains a fork head DNA-binding domain. Genes Dev. 1992 Apr;6(4):599–608. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.4.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ekker S. C., von Kessler D. P., Beachy P. A. Differential DNA sequence recognition is a determinant of specificity in homeotic gene action. EMBO J. 1992 Nov;11(11):4059–4072. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05499.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Evans R. M. The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science. 1988 May 13;240(4854):889–895. doi: 10.1126/science.3283939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Frankel A. D., Kim P. S. Modular structure of transcription factors: implications for gene regulation. Cell. 1991 May 31;65(5):717–719. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90378-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fried M., Crothers D. M. Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor-operator interactions by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Dec 11;9(23):6505–6525. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.23.6505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Garner M. M., Revzin A. A gel electrophoresis method for quantifying the binding of proteins to specific DNA regions: application to components of the Escherichia coli lactose operon regulatory system. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jul 10;9(13):3047–3060. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.13.3047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Graham A., Papalopulu N., Krumlauf R. The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):367–378. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90912-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Grossniklaus U., Pearson R. K., Gehring W. J. The Drosophila sloppy paired locus encodes two proteins involved in segmentation that show homology to mammalian transcription factors. Genes Dev. 1992 Jun;6(6):1030–1051. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.6.1030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hernandez N. TBP, a universal eukaryotic transcription factor? Genes Dev. 1993 Jul;7(7B):1291–1308. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.7b.1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hollenberg S. M., Evans R. M. Multiple and cooperative trans-activation domains of the human glucocorticoid receptor. Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):899–906. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90145-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hope I. A., Mahadevan S., Struhl K. Structural and functional characterization of the short acidic transcriptional activation region of yeast GCN4 protein. Nature. 1988 Jun 16;333(6174):635–640. doi: 10.1038/333635a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hope I. A., Struhl K. Functional dissection of a eukaryotic transcriptional activator protein, GCN4 of yeast. Cell. 1986 Sep 12;46(6):885–894. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90070-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hromas R., Moore J., Johnston T., Socha C., Klemsz M. Drosophila forkhead homologues are expressed in a lineage-restricted manner in human hematopoietic cells. Blood. 1993 Jun 1;81(11):2854–2859. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Häcker U., Grossniklaus U., Gehring W. J., Jäckle H. Developmentally regulated Drosophila gene family encoding the fork head domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 15;89(18):8754–8758. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.18.8754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ip Y. T., Poon D., Stone D., Granner D. K., Chalkley R. Interaction of a liver-specific factor with an enhancer 4.8 kilobases upstream of the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jul;10(7):3770–3781. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.7.3770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson P. F., McKnight S. L. Eukaryotic transcriptional regulatory proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1989;58:799–839. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.004055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kaestner K. H., Lee K. H., Schlöndorff J., Hiemisch H., Monaghan A. P., Schütz G. Six members of the mouse forkhead gene family are developmentally regulated. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 15;90(16):7628–7631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.16.7628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kissinger C. R., Liu B. S., Martin-Blanco E., Kornberg T. B., Pabo C. O. Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.8 A resolution: a framework for understanding homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell. 1990 Nov 2;63(3):579–590. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90453-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Knöchel S., Lef J., Clement J., Klocke B., Hille S., Köster M., Knöchel W. Activin A induced expression of a fork head related gene in posterior chordamesoderm (notochord) of Xenopus laevis embryos. Mech Dev. 1992 Aug;38(2):157–165. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(92)90007-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuo C. J., Conley P. B., Chen L., Sladek F. M., Darnell J. E., Jr, Crabtree G. R. A transcriptional hierarchy involved in mammalian cell-type specification. Nature. 1992 Jan 30;355(6359):457–461. doi: 10.1038/355457a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lai E., Darnell J. E., Jr Transcriptional control in hepatocytes: a window on development. Trends Biochem Sci. 1991 Nov;16(11):427–430. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(91)90169-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lai E., Prezioso V. R., Smith E., Litvin O., Costa R. H., Darnell J. E., Jr HNF-3A, a hepatocyte-enriched transcription factor of novel structure is regulated transcriptionally. Genes Dev. 1990 Aug;4(8):1427–1436. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.8.1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lai E., Prezioso V. R., Tao W. F., Chen W. S., Darnell J. E., Jr Hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 alpha belongs to a gene family in mammals that is homologous to the Drosophila homeotic gene fork head. Genes Dev. 1991 Mar;5(3):416–427. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.3.416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Levine M., Hoey T. Homeobox proteins as sequence-specific transcription factors. Cell. 1988 Nov 18;55(4):537–540. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90209-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Levine M., Manley J. L. Transcriptional repression of eukaryotic promoters. Cell. 1989 Nov 3;59(3):405–408. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90024-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li C., Lai C. F., Sigman D. S., Gaynor R. B. Cloning of a cellular factor, interleukin binding factor, that binds to NFAT-like motifs in the human immunodeficiency virus long terminal repeat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Sep 1;88(17):7739–7743. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.17.7739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li C., Lusis A. J., Sparkes R., Tran S. M., Gaynor R. Characterization and chromosomal mapping of the gene encoding the cellular DNA binding protein HTLF. Genomics. 1992 Jul;13(3):658–664. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90138-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Li J., Vogt P. K. The retroviral oncogene qin belongs to the transcription factor family that includes the homeotic gene fork head. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 May 15;90(10):4490–4494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Liu J. K., DiPersio C. M., Zaret K. S. Extracellular signals that regulate liver transcription factors during hepatic differentiation in vitro. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;11(2):773–784. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.2.773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mann R. S., Hogness D. S. Functional dissection of Ultrabithorax proteins in D. melanogaster. Cell. 1990 Feb 23;60(4):597–610. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90663-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McPherson C. E., Shim E. Y., Friedman D. S., Zaret K. S. An active tissue-specific enhancer and bound transcription factors existing in a precisely positioned nucleosomal array. Cell. 1993 Oct 22;75(2):387–398. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80079-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Miller L. M., Gallegos M. E., Morisseau B. A., Kim S. K. lin-31, a Caenorhabditis elegans HNF-3/fork head transcription factor homolog, specifies three alternative cell fates in vulval development. Genes Dev. 1993 Jun;7(6):933–947. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.6.933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mitchell P. J., Tjian R. Transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells by sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Science. 1989 Jul 28;245(4916):371–378. doi: 10.1126/science.2667136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Miura N., Wanaka A., Tohyama M., Tanaka K. MFH-1, a new member of the fork head domain family, is expressed in developing mesenchyme. FEBS Lett. 1993 Jul 12;326(1-3):171–176. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81785-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nitsch D., Schütz G. The distal enhancer implicated in the developmental regulation of the tyrosine aminotransferase gene is bound by liver-specific and ubiquitous factors. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;13(8):4494–4504. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.8.4494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Olson E. N. MyoD family: a paradigm for development? Genes Dev. 1990 Sep;4(9):1454–1461. doi: 10.1101/gad.4.9.1454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Otting G., Qian Y. Q., Billeter M., Müller M., Affolter M., Gehring W. J., Wüthrich K. Protein--DNA contacts in the structure of a homeodomain--DNA complex determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in solution. EMBO J. 1990 Oct;9(10):3085–3092. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07505.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pani L., Overdier D. G., Porcella A., Qian X., Lai E., Costa R. H. Hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 beta contains two transcriptional activation domains, one of which is novel and conserved with the Drosophila fork head protein. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Sep;12(9):3723–3732. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.9.3723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pani L., Quian X. B., Clevidence D., Costa R. H. The restricted promoter activity of the liver transcription factor hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 beta involves a cell-specific factor and positive autoactivation. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;12(2):552–562. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.2.552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ptashne M., Gann A. A. Activators and targets. Nature. 1990 Jul 26;346(6282):329–331. doi: 10.1038/346329a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ramakrishnan V., Finch J. T., Graziano V., Lee P. L., Sweet R. M. Crystal structure of globular domain of histone H5 and its implications for nucleosome binding. Nature. 1993 Mar 18;362(6417):219–223. doi: 10.1038/362219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Raymondjean M., Pichard A. L., Gregori C., Ginot F., Kahn A. Interplay of an original combination of factors: C/EBP, NFY, HNF3, and HNF1 in the rat aldolase B gene promoter. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Nov 25;19(22):6145–6153. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.22.6145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rigaud G., Roux J., Pictet R., Grange T. In vivo footprinting of rat TAT gene: dynamic interplay between the glucocorticoid receptor and a liver-specific factor. Cell. 1991 Nov 29;67(5):977–986. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90370-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rosenfeld M. G. POU-domain transcription factors: pou-er-ful developmental regulators. Genes Dev. 1991 Jun;5(6):897–907. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.6.897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ruiz i Altaba A., Jessell T. M. Pintallavis, a gene expressed in the organizer and midline cells of frog embryos: involvement in the development of the neural axis. Development. 1992 Sep;116(1):81–93. doi: 10.1242/dev.116.Supplement.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sasaki H., Hogan B. L. Differential expression of multiple fork head related genes during gastrulation and axial pattern formation in the mouse embryo. Development. 1993 May;118(1):47–59. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.1.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sawaya P. L., Stripp B. R., Whitsett J. A., Luse D. S. The lung-specific CC10 gene is regulated by transcription factors from the AP-1, octamer, and hepatocyte nuclear factor 3 families. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Jul;13(7):3860–3871. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.7.3860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith D. B., Johnson K. S. Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene. 1988 Jul 15;67(1):31–40. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Strähle U., Blader P., Henrique D., Ingham P. W. Axial, a zebrafish gene expressed along the developing body axis, shows altered expression in cyclops mutant embryos. Genes Dev. 1993 Jul;7(7B):1436–1446. doi: 10.1101/gad.7.7b.1436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tao W., Lai E. Telencephalon-restricted expression of BF-1, a new member of the HNF-3/fork head gene family, in the developing rat brain. Neuron. 1992 May;8(5):957–966. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90210-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Weigel D., Jäckle H. The fork head domain: a novel DNA binding motif of eukaryotic transcription factors? Cell. 1990 Nov 2;63(3):455–456. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90439-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Weigel D., Jürgens G., Küttner F., Seifert E., Jäckle H. The homeotic gene fork head encodes a nuclear protein and is expressed in the terminal regions of the Drosophila embryo. Cell. 1989 May 19;57(4):645–658. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90133-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Weintraub H., Davis R., Tapscott S., Thayer M., Krause M., Benezra R., Blackwell T. K., Turner D., Rupp R., Hollenberg S. The myoD gene family: nodal point during specification of the muscle cell lineage. Science. 1991 Feb 15;251(4995):761–766. doi: 10.1126/science.1846704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES