Skip to main content
PMC home page
Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences logoLink to Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences
. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):725–738.

Two Dimensional Structural Analysis and Expression of a New Staphylococcus aureus Adhesin Based Fusion Protein

Jamshid Faghri 1, Delavar Shahbazzadeh 2, Kamran Pooshang Bagheri 2, Sharareh Moghim 1,*, Hajieh Ghasemian Safaei 1, Bahram Nasr Esfahani 1, Hossein Fazeli 1, Rahmatolah Yazdani 1, Hamid Mirmohammad Sadeghi 3
PMCID: PMC3586881  PMID: 23493747

Abstract

Objective(s)

Staphylococcus aureus is a foremost source of numerous nosocomial and community acquired infections. Antibiotic therapy for vancomycin resistant S. aureus (VRSA) can not promise the eradication of infections. Since adhesion is the major route of infections, adhesin based vaccine could suppress S. aureus infections. Fibronectin binding protein A (FnBPA) and clumping factor A (ClfA) are major responsible adhesions involved in S. aureus infections, so they could be candidate vaccine molecules against an extensive range of infections. This project intended to express a new fusion protein construct and analysis of biological activity regarding binding activity.

Materials and Methods

pfnbA- ClfA construct was transformed to Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). Transformant E. coli were grown in LB broth and induced with IPTG and cellular extracts were separated on SDS–PAGE. RT-PCR was performed to verify expression. Binding activity of fusion protein was studied using human gingival fibroblast (HGF) cell line. D1-D3 protein from unpublished study was used as control.

Results

The expected fusion protein fragment showed by SDS-PAGE. RT-PCR verified the existence of mRNA relating to expressed fusion protein. Binding activity of S. aureus decreased after treatment of HGF cells with fusion protein.

Conclusion

In total, binding activity of fusion protein was approximately two fold lesser than D1-D3 protein. It is supposed that the fusion protein could not be attached to its ligand easily and would be more accessible to antigen presenting cells and consequently protective antibodies will be produced. This project is pending for in vivo infection study in animal model.

Key Words: Adhesion, Clumping factor A, Fibronectin binding protein A, Fusion protein, Staphylococcus aureus, Two dimensional structure

Introduction

From the past decades to now, Staphylococcus aureus has been the major cause of life-threatening community-acquired and nosocomial infections. S. aureus can adhere to many cells and invade many organs causing the broad spectrum of important Staphylococcal diseases which include septicemia, wound infections, endocarditis, septic arthritis, toxic-shock syndrome, scalded-skin syndrome, and food poisoning (1).

Before the advent of antibiotic, infections with S. aureus caused numerous deaths. S. aureus bacteremia resulted in a mortality rate of 80% (2). The introduction of penicillin in the 1940s considerably changed this situation. Quickly S. aureus resistant to penicillin appeared. Methicillin was first introduced in 1959 as a first generation of semisynthetic penicillins for the treatment of infections caused by penicillin-resistant SA. Just 2 years following its introduction, the first methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was described (3) and the first nosocomial MRSA epidemic was reported soon afterwards (4). Numerous nosocomial MRSA outbreaks have occurred in most developed and developing countries from many geographical regions (5, 6).

For many years vancomycin has been considered the first option among other drugs for the treatment of MRSA. However, 12 years earlier, Hiramatsu et al reported the first strain of S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (7) followed by 2 additional cases from the USA (8, 9). These earlier isolates were termed Vancomycin Intermediate S. aureus (VISA). However, in July 2002, things changed when the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) published the first documented report of S. aureus that was resistant to vancomycin as well as being resistant to methicillin (10, 11). The infection occurred in a diabetic patient with chronic renal failure who was undergoing peritoneal dialysis in a hospital in Michigan (12, 8). Additional cases of vancomycin resistance S. aureus (VRSA) have been reported from USA and other countries, to date (13-16). The potential clinical impact of these strains on the management of patients is very important.

Since adhesin is the major route of S. aureus entrance to human body, immunization with adhesin molecules could protect the human against Staphylococcal diseases. Adhesin molecules in S. aureus belong to a family of surface proteins designated microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM). S. aureus adhesins have efficient ability to promote adhesion to the extracellular matrix and cell associated receptors as well as protein ligands in plasma (17-19). These important characteristics made them significant targets for vaccination to suppress bacterial colonization and consequent possible infections (20). Among MSCRAMM family of microbial proteins, fibronectin binding protein (FnBP) and clumping factor are major adhesins which interfere with adhesin and invasion. The FnBP adhesins of S. aureus promote adhesion to tissue extracellular matrix (18, 19) indwelling medical devices, keratinocytes, endothelial cells, and traumatized tissues as well as internalization by different cell types (18, 21-25).

Two tandem fnb genes, encoding FnBPA and FnBPB (18, 19), exist in S. aureus genome. FnBPA is present in all standard and clinical strains. Each of FnBPA and FnBPB possesses three consecutive 37- or 38-amino-acid D motifs; designated D1, D2, and D3 comprise a high-affinity fibronectin binding domain (26). Ligand-binding domain of the FnBPA protein has been used to induce adhesion-blocking antibodies (27, 28). D1, D1-D2, D2-D3, D1-D3, and similar synthetic peptides could not generate efficient blocking antibodies (29-31). The main reason is high binding affinity of these molecules to fibronectin that is broadly distributed in extracellular milieu, different cell surfaces and plasma. In such circumstances antigen binds to its ligand and antigen presenting cells can not efficiently phagocyte them thus antibody response is largely prohibited.

The goal of this study is overcoming the problem via structural manipulation in amino acid sequences responsible for binding activity of fibronectin binding domain to prevent S. aureus infections.

Materials and Methods

Bioinformatics design

Conformational alteration in structure of fibronectin-binding domain especially in active motifs could lead to changes in biological activity.

Binding domains in fnbA genes are highly conserved among S. aureus standard strains accordingly S. aureus subsp. aureus NCTC 8325 was selected as reference strain (ACCESSION NC_007795).

The ability of binding to Fn is related to the C-terminal 20 amino acids of each D motif (32-34). Active binding motifs are the sequence GG (I/V)DF, alteration to either of the GG or IDF causes lack of binding to Fn (18, 19, 33). Mutational deletion in binding motifs are not recommended due to necessity of binding motifs in induction of antibody response. The other way to overcome this problem is conformational alterations in either binding motifs or binding domain via insertion mutation. For this purpose short peptides from binding domain of adhesins relating to S. aureus NCTC 8325 were selected as candidate insertion sequence. The candidate peptide shall be induced the mentioned alterations, preferably existed in all or near almost strains of S. aureus, and act as a good immunogen.

Binding domain of S. aureus adhesins including elastin-binding protein (35), collagen binding protein (36), Bone sialoprotein binding protein (37), and laminin binding protein (38) were studied regarding these characteristics and finally C-terminal fragment of clumping factor A binding domain was selected as candidate insertion sequence.

ClfA is an important adhesin bind to fibrinogen and involved in colonization of implanted biomaterials or damaged endothelial surfaces at the site of endovascular infections (39). ClfA as a major virulence factor has a significant role in such infections (40-42). The Fibrinogen binding activity of ClfA has been localized to the N-terminal A region of this protein (43). Binding domain of ClfA is too large; thus a short sized fragment corresponding to C- terminal segment of ClfA binding domain was selected as candidate insertion sequence. It is proved that C- terminal segment of ClfA binding domain has efficient immunogenicity. This segment not only alters the 2-D conformation of FnBPA binding domain in silico but may also boost the immunogenicity of final fusion protein.

Bioinformatics analysis

Evaluation of homology

The homology of amino acid sequence between fusion protein (derived from S. aureus NCTC 8325) and the other S. aureus strains was evaluated using BlastP. BlastP was performed to evaluate the homology between amino acid sequences of fusion protein and human proteins as well.

Prediction of 2-dimensional structure of FnBPA, FnBPA binding domain (D1-D3), ClfA, and C-terminal segment of ClfA binding domain using PSIPRED software in UCL Server

FnBPA binding domain (D1-D3) and terminal segment of ClfA binding domain derived from their origin molecules FnBPA and ClfA and their possible structures were elucidated and compared with target molecules separately (44).

Prediction of 2-dimensional structure of the possible target molecules D1-D2-D3-ClfA, ClfA-D1-D2-D3, D1-D2-ClfA-D3, and D1-ClfA-D2-D3 using PSIPRED software (44)

There are four possible combinations to construct the fusion protein that should be structurally predicted. Different combinations of D1, D2, D3, and terminal segment of ClfA binding domain were predicted and compared with one another. The best combination must possess the highest conformational alteration in total structure and in binding motifs.

Evaluation of restriction sites

Restriction sites within FnBPA binding domain (D1-D3), terminal segment of ClfA binding domain, fusion protein, and pET-15b sequences were determined before using DNAMAN software.

The primers used to RT-PCR for fusion protein and D1-D3 designed by oligo analyzer software

Candidate primers analyzed by oligo analyzer software regarding Tm, GC %, dG, 3'-tail GC, 3'-tail dG, molecular weight, self annealing, and loops. A 525 bp and a 348 bp RT-PCR product should be detected after electrophoresis to verification of mRNA concerning fusion of protein and D1-D3 respectively.

Selection of overhangs to overlapping the PCR products via hybridization

Hybridization temperature of KVSGDL overhangs was evaluated. Amino acids KVS (Lys, Val, Ser) are located at the end of D1-D3. Amino acids GDL (Gly, Asp, Leu) are located at the beginning of terminal fragment of ClfA. The nucleotide sequences relating to KVS and GDL were incorporated in ClfA Fw primer and D1-D3 Rv primer respectively. In this manner, digested PCR products would be hybridized together via KVS (AAA GTA AGC) and GDL (GGT GAT TTA) overhangs.

Bacterial strains, genes, protein, peptide, plasmid vector, cell line, and primers

Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) (Cinnagen-Iran) was selected as expression host. pfnbA-clfA from the previous study (45) and pD1-D3 (unpublished data) were used as expression vectors. Human gingival fibroblast (HGF1-PI 1) was used as cell line for adhesion assay. All of the primers used in this study were manufactured by TAG Copenhagen Company (Sweden).

Expression of fusion protein and D1-D3 construct

The transformant E. coli DH5α was harbouring pfnbA-clfA from the previous study and pD1-D3 (unpublished data) cultivated in LB broth containing ampicillin. The plasmid vector extracted using alkali lysis method. The extracted vector transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells using standard CaCl2 method. The cells of this preculture were harvested, washed and grown at 37° C in Luria-Bertani broth containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin with constant shaking (120 RPM) to an A600 of 0.6 and induced at 37° C with 100 μM IPTG for 4 hr. Thirty min after induction 100 µg/ml rifampin was added to the suspension to inhibit protein synthesis in expression host. A separate culture for each construct was not induced and used as control. Induced and uninduced cells were harvested by centrifugation and the wet pellet resuspended in sonication buffer containing Tris, EDTA and 1 mg lysozyme/ wet pellet. The cell suspension disrupted in a laboratory sonicator (MSE) five times (30 sec pulse and 45 sec rest). Crude extract was filtered in 0.2 µm syringe filter and centrifuged at 13000 RPM to exclude the cell debris.

SDS-PAGE

Protein concentration was measured at 280 nm in a UV photometer (Biometra- Germany). Crude extracts relating to pfnbA-clfA, pD1-D3, and uninduced cells were boiled for 5 min in sample buffer and separated on SDS–12.5% polyacrylamide gel at 110 volt for 3 hr in tris-glycine-SDS buffer (pH 8.3).

RT-PCR for mRNAs transcribed from the ORF of fnbA-clfA

For final verification of fusion protein expression, the mRNAs corresponding to fnbA-clfA ORF were extracted from the cell pellets using RNX solution (Cinnagen-Iran). The RT-PCR reactions should lead to production of 525 bp PCR products. cDNA synthesis was performed for induced and uninduced cells at 42 °C for 1 hr using 1 µl random hexamer (Fermentas), RT (200U/µl), 170 and 130 µg RNA for induced and uninduced cells respectively and reached to final volume of 20 µl with DEPC treated water.

cDNA synthesis followed by RT-PCR reaction using specific forward (5'-ATGGGCCAAAATAGCGGTAAC-3') and reverse primer (5'- CTCTGGAATTGGTTCAATTTC-3') against synthesized fnbA-clfA cDNA.

The RT-PCR mixture for fnbA-clfA ORF consisted of 3 µl cDNA, 10 pm of forward and reverse primers, 1, 1.5, 3, and MgCl2, 200 µM of each dNTP, 1X PCR buffer, and 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Cinnagen-Iran) and double-distilled water were added to achieve a final volume of 30 µl. A total number of 40 PCR cycles were run under the following conditions: DNA denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min (5 min for the first cycle), primer annealing at 50 °C for 1 min, and DNA extension at 72 °C for 2 min. PCR product was analyzed using a 1% ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel.

RT-PCR for mRNAs transcribed from pD1-D3 ORF

For final confirmation of D1-D3 expression, the mRNA corresponding to D1-D3 ORFs was extracted from the cell pellets using RNX solution (Cinnagen-Iran). The RT-PCR reactions for D1-D3's mRNA should lead to production of 348 bp PCR products. cDNA synthesis is followed by RT-PCR reaction using specific forward (5'-ATGGGCCAAAATAGCGGTAAC-3') and reverse primer (5'-GCTTACTTTTGGAAGTGTATC-3') against synthesized D1-D3 cDNA.

cDNA synthesis was performed for induced and uninduced cells at 42 °C for 1 hr using 1µl random hexamer (Fermentas), RT (200 U/µl), 200 and 140 µg RNA for induced and uninduced cells respectively and reached final volume of 20 µl with DEPC treated water.

The RT-PCR mixture for fnbA-clfA ORF contained of 3 µl cDNA, 10 pm of forward and reverse primers, 1.5, 3, and MgCl2, 200 µM of each dNTP, 1X PCR buffer, and 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Cinnagen-Iran) and double-distilled water was added to achieve a final volume of 30 µl. PCR heating program was the same as for fnbA- ClfA.

Adhesion assay

A loopfull of bacteria subcultured in brain hear infusion (BHI) broth at 37 °C for 18-24 hr. 1.4 ml of heavy culture centrifuged at 7000 RPM for 5 min. The pellet were washed two times in TE buffer at 7000 RPM for 5 min and resuspended in 200 μl TE buffer. This concentrated suspension was used to prepare 0.5 McFarland standard by means of a spectrophotometer (SPECTRONIC 20D- Milton Roy). An OD equivalent to 0.1 at 625 nm was agreed as 0.5 McFarland standard. At this point the bacterial concentration is equal to 1.5×108/ml. Fibroblasts (3×103) were cultured on coverslip in 1 ml RPMI 1640 with %10 FBS in a 24 well plate for 3 days in a humidified 37 °C, 5% Co2 incubator (Memmert). The wells and coverslips were washed with TE buffer two times and refilled with 1 ml TE buffer. Three descending concentrations of fusion protein and D1-D3 were prepared in TE buffer and 500 μl from each concentration were added to the wells and incubated at 37 °C for 1 hr. Two duplicate wells were used as growth control and adhesion control and no protein were added. The coverslips were washed with TE buffer two times. 100 μl bacteria equal to 1.5×107 bacteria was added to wells, mixed, and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The coverslips were washed with 1ml TE buffer two times. The cells were fixed with 100 μl methanol, washed again with TE buffer, and stained with 50 μl crystal violet (0.02%) for 3 min. The coverslips were washed with 1 ml TE buffer three times, dried out at RT, and counted under microscope in 100 fields at 40X magnification and the average count calculated as result.

Results

BlastP

The results demonstrated that the amino acid sequence of fusion protein is very similar to all published sequences (identity: 85-100%) corresponding to S. aureus Fibronectin-binding proteins A and B as well as Clumping factor A. No significant similarity was found between amino acid sequences of fusion protein and human proteins.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Prediction of 2-Dimensional structure of the ClfA

Prediction of 2-dimensional structure of the FnBPA, ClfA, FnBPA binding domain (D1-D3), and terminal segment of ClfA binding domain

2-D prediction was performed using PSIPRED software in UCL Server (44). Summarized results regarding total structure and binding motifs are listed in Table 2. Predicted conformation of FnBPA includes 38 beta strands, 40 coils, and 1 alpha helix. Binding domain is flanked by amino acid sequence number 717-831. 2-D structure of this domain within molecule consists of 1 beta strand and 2 coils (Figure 1).

Figure1.

Figure1

Open in a new tab

Prediction of 2-Dimensional structure of the FnBPA

Predicted conformation of ClfA includes 28 beta strands, 34 coils, and 6 alpha helixes. ClfA binding domain is located in C-terminal between amino acids 40 and 559.

Terminal fragment of ClfA binding domain (59 amino acid) is located between amino acids 501 and 559. 2-D structure of this fragment within molecule consists of 3 beta strands and 4 coils (Figure1).

FnBPA binding domain (D1-D3) consists of 115 Amino acids flanked by amino acid sequence number 717-831. Its predicted conformation includes 7 beta strands, 2 alpha helixes, 10 coils. D1, D2, and D3 consist of 38, 38, and 39 amino acids respectively. Binding motifs in D1, D2, and D3 are “IDF”, “IDF”, and “VDF” respectively. Within IDF (number 29-31) in D1, “I” has beta strand and “DF” have coil structures. Within “IDF” (number 67-69) in D2, “I” has beta strand and “DF” have coil structures. Within “VDF” (number 104-106) in D3, “V” has coil and “DF” have beta strand structures. Its predicted conformation includes 7 beta strands, 10 coils, and 2 alpha helixes (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

2-D structure of D1-D3

ClfA binding domain consists of 59 amino acids and flanked by amino acid sequence number 501-559. Its predicted conformation includes 3 beta strands, 4 coils, and no alpha helix (Figure 1).

Prediction of 2-dimensional structure of the possible recombinant molecules rD1-D2-D3-ClfA, rClfA-D1-D2-D3, rD1-D2-ClfA-D3, and rD1-ClfA-D2-D3 using PSIPRED software ( 44 )

Among four possible combinations to construction of fusion protein, rD1-D2-D3-ClfA had the highest conformational alteration in total structure and in binding motifs and was selected as candidate molecule. All of downstream bioinformatic analyses were performed based on this arrangement.

Summarized results regarding total structure and binding motifs are listed in Table 1. Predicted conformation of rD1-D2-D3-ClfA includes 11 beta strands, 12 coils, and no alpha helix (Figure 5).

Table1.

Detailed 2-D structure of adhesions, recombinant proteins and binding motifs

Structures
Molecules		 alpha helixes beta strands coils IDF
 IDF
 VDF
I D F I D F V D F
D1-D3 binding domain within FnBPA 0 1 2 C C C
Terminal fragment of ClfA within ClfA 0 3 4 ____ ____ ____
D1-D3 binding domain 2 7 10 B C C B C C C B B
Terminal fragment of ClfA 0 3 4 ____ ____ ____
rD1-D2-D3-ClfA 0 11 12 B B C B B B B B B
rClfA-D1-D2-D3 0 11 12 B B C B B C B B B
rD1-D2-ClfA-D3 2 9 12 B C C B B C C C B
rD1-ClfA-D2-D3 3 5 9 B B C C C C C C B
Open in a new tab

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

2-D structure of recombinant D1-D2-D3-ClfA

The detail results regarding 2D prediction of D1-D3 binding domain within FnBPA, terminal fragment of ClfA within ClfA, D1-D3 binding domain, terminal fragment of ClfA, rD1-D2-D3-ClfA, rClfA-D1-D2-D3, rD1-D2-ClfA-D3, and rD1-ClfA-D2-D3 outlined in Table 1.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

2-D structure of terminal segment of ClfA binding domain

SDS-PAGE of crude extracts relating to induced and uninduced cells for fusion protein

SDS-PAGE showed the expected fusion protein fragment in induced cells (Figure 6). Comparison of induced and uninduced cells showed a 19.6 kDa fragment in the crude extract of induced cells. Concentrations of crude extracts for induced and uninduced cells were 28.35 and 22.38 mg/ml respectively.

Figure 6.

SDS-PAGE of crude extracts relating to induced and uninduced cells for fusion protein.

Figure 6

Lane 1. Crude extract relating to induced cells.

Lane 2. Crude extract relating to uninduced cells.

Lane 3. 1/10 diluted crude extract relating to uninduced cells.

Lane 4. Protein molecular weight marker (Fermentas). Concentration of each fragment is 0.1-0.2 mg/ml.

Open in a new tab

SDS-PAGE of crude extracts relating to induced and uninduced cells for D1-D3

Comparison of induced and uninduced bands showed a 13.1 kDa fragment in the crude extract of induced cells (Figure 7). Concentrations of crude extracts regarding the induced and uninduced cells, were 20.2 and 10 mg/ml respectively.

Figure 7.

SDS-PAGE of crude extracts relating to induced and uninduced cells for D1-D3

Figure 7

Lane 1. Protein Molecular Weight Marker (Fermentas). Concentration of each fragment is 0.1-0.2 mg/ml

Lane 2. Crude extract relating to Uninduced cells

Lane 3. Crude extract relating to Induced cells

Open in a new tab

RT-PCR for fusion protein

The amplified fragments relating to mRNAs were transcribed from pfnbA-clfA and pD1-D3 constructs are shown in Figures 8 and 9. A 525 bp product was seen after electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel. Different concentrations of MgCl2 were applied in the test. The fragment amplified in 3 Mm MgCl2 was accepted as result.

Figure 8.

RT-PCR for mRNA related to fusion protein

Figure 8

Lane 1. DNA ladder FastRuler, low range (Fermentas)

Lane 2-5. Ascending concentration of MgCl2: 5 Mm, 3 Mm, 1.5 Mm, 1Mm

Open in a new tab

Figure 9.

RT-PCR for mRNA related to D1-D3

Figure 9

Lane 1. DNA ladder FastRuler, low range (Fermentas)

Lane 2-4. Ascending concentration of MgCl2: 5 Mm, 3 Mm, 1.5Mm

Open in a new tab

RT-PCR for D1-D3

A 348 bp product was observed in the following electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel. Different concentrations of MgCl2 were applied in the test. The fragment amplified in 1.5 Mm MgCl2 was accepted as result.

Cell adhesion assay

The attached bacteria on the surface of fibroblast in fusion protein and D1-D3 groups (induced and uninduced hosts) and quantity of attached bacteria/cell in three concentrations of fusion protein and D1-D3 (6.25, 12.5, and 25 mg/ml) are shown in Figures 10 and 11. The average quantity of attached bacteria for the crude extract regarding to uninduced host for fusion protein and D1-D3 vectors were approximately 110 bacteria/cell. The average quantity of attached bacteria for adhesion control group was about 115 bacteria/cell.

Figure 10.

Average quantity of attached bacteria /cell in fusion protein group

Figure 10

The ascending concentrations of crude extract were 6.25, 12.5, and 25 mg/ml.

Open in a new tab

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Open in a new tab

Average quantity of attached bacteria /cell in D1-D3 group

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (ver.12).

Linear regression analysis was performed for fusion protein group and showed negative correlation (R= -0.987) between protein concentration and the number of attached bacteria. Linear regression analysis was performed in D1-D3 group and showed negative correlation (R= -0.994) between protein concentration and the number of attached bacteria. Comparing the results of attached bacteria between fusion protein group and D1-D3 group using FTEST confirmed that the variances are not significantly different (0.497). Student's t-Test showed that there is a borderline meaningful difference between the results in two groups (P= 0.05).

Discussion

Morbidity and mortality due to methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) have been frequently reported from many geographical regions (46, 47). Intermediate or full resistance S. aureus strains to vancomycin have emerged during the past decade (48-51) and studies are being still made to search new alternative solutions. Annually, responsible health organizations in many countries routinely establish the annual significant budget to challenge staphylococcal diseases. One of the solutions to terminate this challenge would be inhibition of S. aureus entrance to body via adhesin and invasin molecules which could be attractive targets for vaccination strategies.

The efficacy of protection against S. aureus infections have been studied with the help of FnBPA or ClfA separately but the results could not meet the full requirements according to active immune protection (52, 53-55). Combination of protein antigens ClfA, FnBPA, and FnBPB appears to provide enhanced protection against prosthetic-device infection (56). It seems that combination of adhesin antigens may increase stimulation of the immune response system. The amino acid sequence relating to FnBPA and ClfA binding domain is highly conserved between S. aureus strains. Thus a fusion protein vaccine based on these two molecules could be applied against all of S. aureus infections.

pfnbA-clfA construct was designed to gather the characteristic of FnBPA and ClfA together (45). As the complete protein is not needed, binding domain of fnbA gene (D1-D3) and a C-terminal 59 amino acid from clfA binding domain were selected to construct a new fusion protein vector (55, 57- 60). pD1-D3 vector was constructed for producing D1-D3 protein (unpublished data). This protein was used as positive control for bacterial adhesion.

It is proposed that simultaneous production of antibodies against binding domains of FnBPA and ClfA may boost immunological response against forthcoming S. aureus infections.

Homology between amino acid sequence of fnbA gene and the other similar genes in the other S. aureus strains indicated that this kind of vaccine could be applied for the infections caused by other S. aureus strains.

The data relating to prediction of 2-D structure of FnBPA, ClfA, fibronectin binding protein within FnBPA, terminal fragment of ClfA binding protein within ClfA, fibronectin binding protein, terminal fragment of ClfA binding protein and different combination of D1, D2, D3, and terminal fragment of ClfA were evaluated and compared with each other (Table1). Comparing the results showed that "D1-D3-ClfA fragment" had the most variations in binding motifs and total structure. Thus it was selected as the candidate molecule in this study.

RT-PCR results verified the existence of mRNA relating to fusion protein and D1-D3 peptide and hence the integrity of expression. Comparison of induced and uninduced bands in SDS-PAGE showed a 19.6 kDa and 13.1 kDa fragment in the crude extract of induced cells respectively.

Binding activity of fusion protein measured microscopically in a cell culture model using human gingival fibroblast. The average quantity of adhered bacteria/cell was accepted as results. Increasing the concentration of fusion protein and D1-D3 led to decrease in quantity of attached bacteria (Figures 10, 11).

The results showed that the number of attached bacteria to fibroblast in the group, incubated with fusion protein were at least 2 fold higher than D1-D3 group. It means that adhesion property of fusion protein is 2 folds lower than D1-D3. In this condition, the fusion protein can not attach to its ligand easily and would be more accessible to antigen presenting cells. The consequence would be easier phagocytosis, presentation of target epitopes to lymphocytes, and production of protective antibodies.

According to linear regression analysis in fusion protein group, increasing the protein concentration led to decrease in attached bacteria (R= -0.987). Based on linear regression analysis in D1-D3 group, increasing the protein concentration led to decrease in attached bacteria (R= -0.994). Comparing the results of attached bacteria between fusion protein group and D1-D3 group using student's t-test showed that there is a borderline difference in biological behavior of two molecules. It means that both of them have binding activity to fibroblast cells but with different activity (P= 0.05). Binding activity of fusion protein is approximately two folds lesser than D1-D3 protein. The average quantity of attached bacteria for fusion protein and D1-D3 in uninduced condition was the same and the results were equivalent to adhesion control group.

Since the adhesion activity of fusion protein is lower than adhesion control group, it may be used as a candidate molecule in the next experiments. According to results, this fusion protein would be applied to prevention of VRSA infections as well as the other S. aureus infections.

Purification of fusion protein and D1-D3, adhesion assay with the other cell lines, administration of purified fusion protein to animal model and checking the efficacy of protection are depend on further evaluation.

Conclusion

We studied the expression and biological activity of fusion protein. Binding activity of fusion protein was just about two fold lesser than D1-D3 protein. The result showed that the fusion protein might not be attached to its ligand easily and would be more reachable to antigen presenting cells and therefore protective antibodies will be produced.

Purification of fusion protein and D1-D3, adhesion assay with the other cell lines, administration of purified fusion protein to animal model and checking the efficacy of protection are depend on further evaluation.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by grant 385463 from Vice Chancellor for Research Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

References

  • 1.Archer GL, Climo MW. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia - consider the source. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:55–56. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200101043440110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Smith IM, Wickers AB. Natural history of 338 treated and untreated patients with Staphylococcal septicemia (1936-1955) Lancet . 1960;1:1318–1322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jevons MP. "Cebenin"-resistant staphylococci. Letter BMJ. 1961;1:124–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stewart GT, Holt RJ. Evolution of natural resistance to the newer penicillin. BMJ. 1963;1:1309–1311. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5326.308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Voss A, Doebbling BN. The worldwide prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agent . 1995;5:101–106. doi: 10.1016/0924-8579(94)00036-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Voss A, Milatovic D, Wallrauch-Schwartz C, Rosdahl VT, Braveny I. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994;13:50–55. doi: 10.1007/BF02026127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hiramatsu K, Hanaki H, Ino T, Yabuta K, Oguri T, Tenover FC. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;40:135–136. doi: 10.1093/jac/40.1.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Centers forDiseaseControlandPrevention. Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin-United States. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2002;51:565–567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tenover FC, Weigel LM, Appelbaum PC, McDougal LK, Chaitram J, McAllister S, et al. Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolate from a Patient in Pennsylvania. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2004;48:275–280. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.1.275-280.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Weigel LM, Clewell DB, Gill SR, Clark NC, McDouga LK, Flannagan SE, et al. Genetic analysis of a high-level vancomycin-resistant isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. Science. 2003;302:1569–1571. doi: 10.1126/science.1090956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Centers forDiseaseControlandPrevention. Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin-United States 2002. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2002;51:565–567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chang S, Sievert DM, Hageman JC, Boulton ML, Tenover FC, Downes FP, et al. Infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the vanA resistance gene. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1342–1347. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Appelbaum PC. The emergence of vancomycin-intermediate and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12:16–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01344.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Saha B, Singh AK, Ghosh A, Bal M. Identification and characterization of a vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Kolkata (South Asia) J Med Microbiol . 2008;57:72–79. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47144-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhu W, Clark NC, McDougal LK, Hageman J, McDonald LC, Patel JB. Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with Inc18-Like vanA plasmids in Michigan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:452–457. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00908-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Palazzo ICV, Araujo MLC, Darini ALC. First report of vancomycin-resistant staphylococci isolated from healthy carriers in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:179–185. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.179-185.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Foster TJ, Hook M. Surface protein adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol. 1998;6:484–488. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(98)01400-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Patti JM, Allen BL, McGavin MJ, Hook M. MSCRAMM mediated adherence of microorganisms to host tissues. Ann Rev Microbiol. 1994;48:585–617. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.003101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Patti JM, Hook M. Microbial adhesins recognizing extracellular matrix macromolecules. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994;6:752–758. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90104-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ingham KC, Brew S, Vaz D, Sauder DN, McGavin MJ. Interaction of Staphylococcus aureus fibronectinbinding protein with fibronectin. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:42945–42953. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M406984200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dziewanowska K, Patti JM, Deobald CF, Bayles KW, Trumble WR, Bohach GA. Fibronectin binding protein and host cell tyrosine kinase are required for internalization of Staphylococcus aureus by epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1999;67:4673–4678. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.9.4673-4678.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kuypers JM, Proctor RA. Reduced adherence to traumatized rat heart valves by a low-fibronectin-binding mutant of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 1989;57:2306–2312. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.8.2306-2312.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mempel M, Schmidt T, Weidinger S, Schnopp C, Foster T, Ring J, et al. Role of Staphylococcus aureus surface-associated proteins in the attachment to cultured HaCaT keratinocytes in a new adhesion assay. J Invest Dermatol . 1998;111:452–456. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00293.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Peacock SJ, Foster TJ, Cameron BJ, Berendt AR. Bacterial fibronectin-binding proteins and endothelial cell surface fibronectin mediate adherence of Staphylococcus aureus to resting human endothelial cells. Microbiology. 1999;145:3477–3486. doi: 10.1099/00221287-145-12-3477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vaudaux P, Pittet D, Haeberli A, Lerch PG, Morgenthaler JJ, Proctor RA, et al. Fibronectin is more active than fibrin or fibrinogen in promoting Staphylococcus aureus adherence to inserted intravascular catheters. J Infect Dis. 1993;167:633–641. doi: 10.1093/infdis/167.3.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sun Q, Smith GM, Zahradka C, McGavin MJ. Identification of D Motif Epitopes in Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin-binding protein for the production of antibody inhibitors of fibronectin binding. Infect Immun. 1997:537–543. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.2.537-543.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Brennan FR, Jones TD, Longstaff M, Chapman S, Bellaby T, Smith H, et al. Immunogenicity of peptides derived from a fibronectin-binding protein of Staphylococcus aureus expressed on two different plant viruses. Vaccine . 1999;17:1846–1857. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(98)00485-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huesca M, Sun Q, Peralta R, Shivji GM, Sauder DN, McGavin MJ. Synthetic peptide immunogens elicit polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies specific for linear epitopes in the D motifs of Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin-binding protein, which are composed of amino acids that are essential for fibronectin binding. Infect Immun . 2000;68:1156–1163. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.3.1156-1163.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ciborowski P, Flock J-I, Wadstrom T. Immunological response to a Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin-binding protein. J Med Microbiol . 1992;37:376–381. doi: 10.1099/00222615-37-6-376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rozalska , B , Sakata N, Wadstrom T. Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin-binding proteins FnBPs: identification of antigenic epitopes using polyclonal antibodies. APMIS. 1994;102:112–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Speziale P, Joh D, Visai L, Bozzini S, House-Pompeo K, Lindberg M. A monoclonal antibody enhances ligand binding of fibronectin MSCRAMM(adhesin) from S. dysgalactiae. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:1371–1378. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.3.1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Huff S, Matsuka YV, McGavin MJ, Ingham.KC Interaction of N-terminal fragments of fibronectin with synthetic and recombinant Dmotifs from its binding protein on Staphylococcus aureus studied using fluorescence anisotropy. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:15563–15570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.McGavin MJ, Gurusiddappa S, Lindgren PE, Lindberg M, Hook M. Fibronectin receptors from Streptococcus dysgalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus: involvement of conserved residues in ligand binding. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:23946–23953. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McGavin MG, Raucci G, Gurusiddappa S, Hook M. Fibronectin binding determinants of the Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin receptor. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:8343–8347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Downer R, Roche F, Park PW, Mecham RP, Foster TJ. The Elastin-binding Protein of Staphylococcus aureus (EbpS) is expressed at the cell surface as an integral membrane protein and not as a cell wall-associated protein. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:243–250. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107621200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nilsson I.M, Patti JM, Bremell T, Hook M, Tarkowski A. Vaccination with a recombinant fragment of collagen adhesin provides protection against Staphylococcus aureus mediated septic death. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:2640–2649. doi: 10.1172/JCI1823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Persson L, Johansson C, Ryden C. Antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus bone saloprotein-binding protein indicate infectious osteomyelitis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16:949–952. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00442-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lopes JD, dos ReisM, Brentani RR. Presence of laminin receptors in Staphylococcus aureus. Science. 1985;229:275–277. doi: 10.1126/science.3160113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Siboo IR, Cheung AL, Bayer AS, Sullam PM. Clumping factor A mediates binding of Staphylococcus aureus to human platelets. Infect Immun. 2001;69:3120–3127. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.5.3120-3127.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Moreillon PJ, Entenza M, Francioli P, McDevitt D, Foster TJ, Francois P, et al. Role of Staphylococcus aureus coagulase and clumping factor in pathogenesis of experimental endocarditis. Infect Immun. 1995;63:4738–4743. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.12.4738-4743.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Que YA, Haefliger JA, Francioli P, Moreillon P. Expression of Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor A in Lactococcus lactis subsp cremoris using a new shuttle vector. Infect. Immun. 2000;68:3516–3522. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.6.3516-3522.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Stutzmann MeierP, Entenza JM, Vaudaux P, Francioli P, Glauser MP, Moreillon P. Study of Staphylococcus aureus pathogenic genes by transfer and expression in the less virulent organism Streptococcus gordonii. Infect Immun. 2001;69:657–664. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.2.657-664.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.McDevitt D, Francois , P VaudauxP, Foster TJ. Identification of the ligand-binding domain of the surface located fibrinogen receptor (clumping factor) of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol. 1995;16:895–907. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bryson K, McGuffin LJ, Marsden RL, Ward JJ, Sodhi JS, Jones DT. Protein structure prediction servers at University College London. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W36–38. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Faghri J, Pooshang BagheriK, Shahbaz ZadehD, Yazdani R, Mirmohammad SadeghiH, Moghim S. Construction of a new fusion protein vector associated to fibronectin binding protein A and clumping factor a derived from Staphylococcus aureus NCTC8325. Iran J Basic Med Sci . 2009;12:18–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kallen AJ, Mu Y, Bulens S, Reingold A, Petit S, Gershman K, et al. Health care–associated invasive MRSA infections, 2005-2008. JAMA . 2010;304:641–647. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Campanile F, Bongiorno D, Borbone S, Stefani S. Hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) in Italy. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob . 2009;8:22. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-8-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Weigel LM, Clewell DB, Gill SR, Clark NC, McDougal LK, Flannagan SE, et al. Genetic analysis of a high level vancomycin-resistant isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. Science . 2003;302:1569–1571. doi: 10.1126/science.1090956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chang S, Sievert DM, Hageman JC, Boulton ML, Tenover FC, Downes FP, et al. Infection with vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the vanA resistance gene. N Engl J Med . 2003;348:1342–1347. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhu W, Clark NC, McDougal LK, Hageman J, McDonald LC, Patel JB. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with Inc18-Like vanA plasmids in michigan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother . 2008;52:452–457. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00908-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Howden BP, Davies JK, Johnson PD, Stinear TP, Grayson ML. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection, and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:199–139. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00042-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sun Q, Smith GM, Zahradka C, McGavin MJ. Identification of D motif epitopes in Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin-binding protein for the production of antibody inhibitors of fibronectin Binding. Infect Immun. 1997:537–543. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.2.537-543.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Colque-Navarro P, Palma M, ¨derquist BS, Flock J, Mollby R. Antibody responses in patients with staphylococcal septicemia against two Staphylococcus aureus fibrinogen binding proteins: clumping factor and an extracellular fibrinogen binding protein. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000;7:14–20. doi: 10.1128/cdli.7.1.14-20.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Josefsson E, Hartford O, O’Brien L, Patti JO, Foster T. Protection against experimental Staphylococcus aureus arthritis by vaccination with clumping factor A, a novel virulence determinant. J Infect Dis. 2001;184:1572–1580. doi: 10.1086/324430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hall AE, Domanski PJ, Patel PR, Vernachio JH, Syribeys PJ, Gorovits EL. Characterization of a protective monoclonal antibody recognizing Staphylococcus aureus MSCRAMM protein clumping factor A. Infect Immun . 2003;71:6864–6870. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.12.6864-6870.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Haggar A, Hussain M, Lönnies H, Herrmann M, Norrby-Teglund A, Flock JI. Extracellular adherence protein from Staphylococcus aureus enhances internalization into eukaryotic cells. Infect Immun . 2003;71:2310–2317. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.5.2310-2317.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Patti JM, Allen BL, McGavin MJ, Hook M. MSCRAMM-mediated adherence of microorganisms to host tissues. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1994;48:585–617. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.003101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Patti JM, Hook M. Microbial adhesins recognizing extracellular matrix macromolecules. Curr Opin Cell Biol . 1994;6:752–758. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90104-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Huesca M, Sun Q, Peralta R, Shivji GM, Sauder DN, McGavin MJ. Synthetic peptide immunogens elicit polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies specific for linear epitopes in the D motifs of Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin-binding protein, which are composed of amino acids that are essential for fibronectin binding. Infect Immun . 2000;68:1156–1163. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.3.1156-1163.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jonsson K, Signas C, Muller HP, Lindberg M. Two different genes encode fibronectin binding proteins in Staphylococcus aureus The complete nucleotide sequence and characterization of the second gene. Eur J Biochem. 1991;202:1041–1048. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16468.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES