Abstract
Introduction
Many studies have shown epidemiological links between strains isolated in tap water, and those isolated from patients. Molecular methods linked to PCR are more reliable and faster for identification of non- tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). In this study molecular methods were used for identification and typing of NTM.
Materials and Methods
Five hundred ml of 85 water samples was passed through 0.45 μm filters. The filters were transferred directly onto 7H10 Middle Brook solid media, containing 15% OADC. PCR for 16S rRNA was done and the PCR product (1500 bp) was sequenced. PRA of the hsp65 gene was investigated to identify the species of isolates. For evaluation of susceptibility of NTM to antimycobacterial agents, E-test method was used.
Result
The genus of 26 isolated NTM was confirmed by 16s rRNA sequence based method. Nineteen isolates of Mycobacteria were differentiated using hsp65 genes PRA. The dominant isolates were M. fortuitum (26.7%), M. chelonae like organism (13.3%) and M. mucogenicum (13.3%). Seventy one percent of NTM species were resistant to isoniazid, 64% to rifampin, 57% to ethambutol, 35% to tetracycline, 14 % to azithromycin and 7.1 % to amikacin.
Conclusion
The results showed that E-test method is not a proper technique for antimycobacterial assay because some NTM species are slow in growing and have no growth on Muller Hinton agar. Regarding the 16S rRNA sequence analysis, the identification of isolates was restricted to the genus level, because 99% similarity within 16S rRNA of two isolates may or may not determine the same species.
Key Words: Antibiotic resistance patterns, E-test, hsp65, NTM, Water samples, 16S rRNA
Introduction
Nontuberculous mycobacteria have been found in potable water, chlorinated biofilms, water distribution systems, soil, dust, food, aerosols and even in free living amoeba in water and animal reservoirs. These organisms can cause hypersensitivity, pneumonitis, asthma and bronchitis, infection of skin, wounds and glands. Moreover these infections are serious threats for cystic fibrosis patients. In recent years NTM have been reported to be important agents of infection in immunosuppressive patients (1). NTM can be isolated from different natural sources among them water (1-4). These organisms have been isolated from hard conditions such as low pH and nutrients. Several species of NTM have been identified in different environments including public drinking water, pool, impotable tap water, water cooler etc. Therefore, water may act as an important NTM source for infection transmission to human. In some studies, the presence of NTM in water samples collected from different regions were determined (1-3, 5). Traditionally, NTM has been detected in clinical and environmental samples by culture-based techniques; however these techniques may not be well suited for environmental samples. Indeed, identification of NTM by culture and phenotypic characterization is widely used but it takes 4 to 6 weeks or longer for slow growing species and identification of some species may be missed by biochemical methods. The rapid methods used for identification include high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), DNA probes, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) using various target regions including heat shock protein 65 KD gene (hsp65), ITS and rpo B (1, 6, 7). PCR-based molecular methods are faster and more reliable and for identification of NTM (1, 5). PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (PRA) of hsp65, 16S rRNA may help to define difficult taxonomical status to identify NTMs. Identification and taxonomic position of NTMs which remained unresolved by cultural and biochemical characteristics could be partially resolved by PRA and sequencing of hsp65, which are frequently used for mycobacterial identification. hsp65 gene is used widely for identification of NTM to species level because of its variability compared to some other conserved genes such as 16S rRNA (6-8) but there is no standard pattern for all of species. Therefore, combination of two or more methods is needed for reliable identification. Nonetheless, 16S rRNA sequencing was needed for a definite response in many cases. Mycobacterial susceptibility testing is important for appropriate patient management. It should be done on initial isolates of Mycobacteria and on clinically significant isolates of certain nontuberculous mycobacteria. E-test (AB Biodisk, ) is a new concept for determining MICs of antimicrobial agents. The relative easy use of this method is a feature which is attractive to smaller clinical laboratories that do not have the facilities necessary to prepare complex susceptibility testing media. In this study 16S rRNA was used for identification of NTM in genus level and differentiation of mycobacteria from other acid fast bacteria and PCR-RFLP of hsp65 gene was used for typing of NTM species. The MICs of some antimicrobial agents were determined by scaled E-test strips.
Materials and Methods
Collection and preparation of the samples
Eighty five water samples were collected from different sources including mineral water (8.2%), dentistry unit water (10.6%), impotable tap water (14.1%), potable water supply (14.1%), haemodialysis unit water (8.2%), general pools (8.2%), river water (7.1%), water spout (11.8%), cold water dispenser (11.8%) , and water boiler (5.9%) in Isfahan. Water samples were prepared by grab sampling method (9). Total chlorine content was determined using DPD method at sampling locations (9, 10). The water in total volume of 2-litters’ was added to sterile Erlenmeyer flasks, containing 1.8 ml of a 3% solution of sodium thio-sulfate as antichlorine and 0.04% cetylpridinium chloride as antimicrobial agent. Five hundred ml of the samples was passed through 0.45 µm filters. The filters were transferred directly onto 7H10 Middle Brook solid media, containing 15% OADC (oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, catalase). The plates were examined once a week for eight weeks. The acid-fast positive colonies were transferred to Lowenstein- Jensen (LJ) slant media and incubated at 37 oC.
Phenotypic identification
The mycobacterial isolates were identified by the growth characteristics, including growth at 25, 37 and 42 °C, pigment production, semi-quantitative catalase test, Tween 80 hydrolysis, arylsulfatase test (3 and 14 days), heat-stable catalase (pH 7, 68 °C), pyrazin amidase (4 and 7 days), urease, nitrate reduction test and colony morphology. Reference strains of M. smegmatis (PTCC 1307) and M. fortuitum (ATCC 6841) were used as control species in all steps of this study.
Evaluation of susceptibility of NTM by E-test method
E-test strips were used to determine the susceptibility of NTM isolates to amikacin, rifampin, ciprofloxacin, ethambutol, tetracycline, doxycycline, azithromycin and isoniazid antibiotics. The turbidity of the bacterial Middle brook 7H9 broth culture was adjusted with additional sterile distilled water to equal a McFarland 1 turbidity standard. Muller Hinton containing 10% OADC and 500 mg/lit cyclohexamide without glycerol were used for the test. The MIC was determined by the intersection of the inhibition ellipse with the concentration of antimicrobial agent on the E-test strip.
Genus and species identification of NTM by PCR-RFLP and 16S rRNA sequences analysis
Chromosomal DNA of NTM isolates were extracted using CTAB (cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide) method (11). PCR of the hsp65 gene was performed using the forward primer for hsp65, Tb11 (5΄ACC AAC GAT GGT GTG TCC AT 3’) and the reverse primer, TB12 (5’ CTT GTC GAA CCG CAT ACC CT 3’), as described previously (12). The PCR products were detected by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. The amplified products of hsp65 gene regions were digested with two restriction enzymes, HaeIII and BstEII, according to the recommendations of the manufacturers. The digested products were separated on 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and the RFLP patterns were analyzed according to fragments sizes (12-15). PCR for 16S rRNA was done in a 50 µl reaction mixture containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 9), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTPs, 1.25 U Taq polymerase, 30 pmol of each primer and 10 ng of DNA template. The sequences of primers were 5´-GGAGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3´ as forward and 5´- AAGGAGGTGATCCATCCGCA-3 as reverse (16). Samples were then subjected to one cycle of 96 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 40 sec, 68 °C for 30 sec, and 72 °C for 30 sec, and one final cycle of 72 °C for 10 min in Biomerta Gradient thermocycler and an Eppendorf AG 22331 (Germany). PCR products were run on 2% agarose gel and examined for the presence of the amplicon band after ethidium bromide staining. PCR products were purified with spin column kit (Qiagene, Germany) and sent for sequencing (Bioneer, Korea).
Results
Chlorine concentrations of the samples ranged from 0 to 1.8 mg/l. Parameters related to investigated water samples and the identified NTM is summarized in Table 1. Twenty one isolates were identified by growth characteristics and conventional biochemical tests. Dominant isolates were M. fortuitum- (26.7%), M. chelonae like organism (13.3%) and M. mucogenicum (13.3%).
Table 1.
Summary of the frequency of NTM isolated from different water sources
| Water sources | Number (%) of samples | Number (%) of positive samples | NTM species |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply | 12 (14.1%) | 5 (41.7%) | M. gordonae, M. mucogenicum, M. furtuitum ss. fortuitum, M. chitae , M. neoaurum |
| Undrinkable tap water | 12 (14.1%) | 6 (50%) | M. chelonae, M. furtuitum, M. mucogenicum , M. chelonae like organism , 2 Unidentified species |
| Waterspout | 10 (11.8%) | 2 (20%) | M. mucogenicum, M. furtuitum ss. fortuitum |
| Cold water dispenser | 10 (11.8%) | 5 (50%) | M. chelonae like organism(2), M. furtuitum 3th variant(2), 1 Unidentified species |
| Dentistry unit water | 9 (10.6%) | 2 (22.2%) | M. mucogenicum , M. fortuitum 3th variant |
| Pool and baths water | 7 (8.2%) | 2 (28.6%) | M. chelonae like organism , M. duvalii |
| Water in haemodialysis center | 7 (8.2%) | 0 | - |
| Mineral water | 7 (8.2%) | 0 | - |
| River water | 6 (7.1%) | 0 | - |
| Hot water dispenser | 5 (5.9%) | 0 | - |
The MICs for 8 current routine antibiotics against mycobacterial infections were examined. Seventy one percent of NTM species were resistant to isoniazid, 64% to rifampin, 57% to ethambutol, 35% to tetracycline, 14% to azithromycin and 7.1% to Amikacin (Table 2).
Table 2.
The MICs (μg/ml) of conventional antimycobacterial drugs against NTM isolates by E test method
| Antibiotics | AK | RI | CI | EB | TS | DC | AZ | IZ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mycobacterium sp. M. chelonae like organism |
0.125 | R | 0.75 | 0.064 | 0.032 | 0.094 | 0.5 | R |
| M. chelonae | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.19 | R | 0.006 | 0.064 | 0.5 | R |
| M. chelonae like organism | 1.5 | 0.002 | 0.25 | R | 0.023 | 0.047 | R | R |
| M. mucogenicum | 0.19 | R | 0.125 | 1 | R | 0.047 | 1.5 | R |
| M. chelonae like organism | 1 | R | 0.03 | R | R | 8 | 4 | R |
| M. duvalii | 3 | R | 0.19 | R | 0.125 | 1 | 2 | R |
| M. mucogenicum | 0.25 | 0.125 | 0.38 | R | 0.002 | 0.016 | 1.5 | R |
| M. smegmatis | 0.125 | R | 0.047 | 0.094 | 0.002 | 0.064 | 0.5 | 8 |
| M.fortuitum | R | 2 | 4 | R | 0.5 | 6 | R | R |
| M.smegmatis | 2 | 12 | 0.023 | R | R | 3 | 2 | R |
| M.fortuitum | 8 | R | 0.75 | R | R | 0.023 | 8 | R |
| M. flavescense | 128 | R | 0.023 | 0.5 | R | 0.5 | 128 | 0. 25 |
| M. fortuitum | 8 | R | 0.094 | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.125 | 8 | 64 |
| M. chelonae like organism | 0.5 | R | 1 | 0.032 | 0.094 | 256 | 0.5 | 2 |
| E. coli (ATCC 25922) | 2 | 4 | 0.064 | R | R | 1 | 64 | R |
R: completely resistant NTM without any susceptibility zone
IZ: isoniazid; RI: rifampicin; EB: ethambutol; AZ: azithromycin; AK: amikacin; CI: ciprofloxacin; DC: doxycycline; TS: tetracycline
PCR-RFLP of the hsp65 gene was examined to identify the species of isolates. A 441 bp fragment of hsp65 genes was amplified and digested by BstEII and HaeIII. The digested fragments separated on 10% PAGE and RFLP patterns were analyzed according to fragment sizes (17). Nineteen isolates of Mycobacteria were differentiated using hsp65 genes PCR-RFLP. Three isolates could not be identified at the species level. Some of the patterns of digested hsp65 PCR products are shown in Figure 1. The obtained sequences results of 16S rRNA were compared to those available in GenBank. All groups of isolates showed a similar score lower than 99%.
Figure 1.
PAGE of hsp65 441-bp amplicons of NTM digested by BstEII. Lad: DNA ladder (50 bp), lanes: 1: unidentified; 2: M. gordonae; 3: M. gordonae; 4: unidentified; 5, 6: M. fortuitum; 7: M. kansasii; 8: M. furtuitu;and 9: M. smegmatis (PTCC 1307)
Figure 2.
Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of 16S rRNA amplified gene. Lad: 1000 bp Ladder, (-): Negative control, (+): Positive control (M. smegmatis), lane 1-15: 16S rRNA PCR products
Discussion
In this study, 85 water samples were collected from different sources. The prevalence of NTM was determined using culture, biochemical tests, 16s rRNA sequencing, and PCR-RFLP analysis of hsp65 gene. 25.9% of water samples contained one to three different species of NTM. Twenty one species were identified by conventional methods. Dominant isolates were M. fortuitum (26.7%), M. chelonae like organism and M. mucogenicum (13.3%). The results shown that there was not any correlation between the species of mycobacteria in water samples and total chlorine concentrations (P value> 0.05) but the correlation with temperature was species-related (P value< 0.05%). Covert and Rodgers isolated different species of NTM from 54% of ice samples and 35% of public drinking water (5). Shin et al showed that half of tap water samples in hospital environment are positive for mycobacteria (22). Argueta et al reported that 25 of 121 food samples (20.6%) were positive for NTM (20). The results of this study showed that the incidence of NTM was similar to other geographical environments.
In this study, a 441-bp fragment of NTM hsp65 gene was amplified and digested by BstEII and HaeIII and their patterns were analyzed on polyacrylamide gel. As shown in Figure 1, there were different PCR-RFLP profiles. Nineteen isolates (86.4%) of NTM were identified at species level by PRA. Three isolates presented profiles that were different from the known RFLP profiles and did not correspond with other studies (8, 12-15, 20-22). Turenne et al showed that hsp65 PRA is useful for identification of some species such as M. gastri and M. kansasii that cannot be identified by other methods (16). Wong and Yip, reported that PCR-RFLP targeting hsp65 gene region could identify 74.5% of NTM (21). Telenti et al identified 10 NTM isolates to the species level using PCR-RFLP in which 439 bp PCR products were digested with BstEII and HaeIII (12). Absence of standardization for all of NTM species may cause some confusing in pattern analysis especially in new species. On the other hand, the interpretation of bands is ambiguous for highly polymorphic species (8). In this study sequencing of 16S rDNA harboring constant region (to identify mycobacterium at the genus level) was used. This method is faster and easier than other molecular methods; however, some disadvantages include base errors and ambiguous bases that may lead to misleading results.
Conclusions
We conclude that 16Sr RNA sequence database analysis is controversial for NTM identification. Regarding the 16S rDNA sequence analysis, a similarity percentage of 99% or higher between two isolates defines a similar species. Indeed, two isolates with a 99% similarity in their 16S rDNA may or may not belong to the same NTM species. According to the results of E- test, resistance of NTM species to rifampin, isoniazid and ethambutol was more than 57%. It seems that rifampin, isoniazid and ethambutol as single drug is not useful for treatment of NTM infections although, ciprofloxacin and doxycycline have more effect. Doxycycline was effective in lower dose than ciprofloxacin and azithromycin. In conclusion using of doxycycline, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline or combination of them could be more suitable for treatment of NTM infections.
Acknowledgment
This assay was supported by grant No. 186056 from Isfahan University of Medical sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
References
- 1.Koning B, Amer Ina, Sollich V, Koning W. Intra and interpatient variability of the hsp65 and 16S-23S intergenic gene region in Mycohaterium abscessus strains from patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:3500–3503. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.7.3500-3503.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Groote MAD, Huitt G. Infections due to rapidly growing Mycobacteria. Clin Infect Dis . 2006;42:1756–1763. doi: 10.1086/504381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Khan IUH, Yadav JS. Development of a single – tube, cell lysis – based, genus – specific PCR method for rapid identification of mycobacteria: optimization of cell lysis, PCR primers and conditions and restriction pattern analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:453–457. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.453-457.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kotoch VM. Infections due to non– tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) Indian J Med Res. 2004;120:290–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Covert TC, Rodgers MR, Reyes AL, Stelma GN. Occurrence of nontoberculous mycobacteria in environmental sample. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;68:3159–3161. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.6.2492-2496.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Park H, Jang H, kim C, Byungseon C, Chang CL, park SK, et al. Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of the internal transcribed spacer regions with genus and species specific PCR primers. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:4080–4085. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.11.4080-4085.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harmsen D, Dostal S, Roth A, Niemann S, Rothgänger J, Sammeth M, et al. Ridom comprehensive and public sequence database for identification of mycobacterium species. BMC Infect Dis. 2003;3:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-3-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hafner B, Haag H, Geiss HK, Noite O. Different molecular methods for the identification of rarely isolated nontuberculous mycobacteria and description of new hsp65 restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns. Mol Cell Probes. 2004;18:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2003.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lenor SC, Arnold EG, Andrew DE. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation; United Book Press Inc; 1998. pp. 1–37. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tehran: Iranian industrial research and standards organization publications; 1997. DPD: National drinking water standards.5th ed. standard no .1053. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cooper C, Jovell B. Isolation and quantification of genomic DNA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. 1999. Available at: http://WWW.Wadsworth.Org/rflp/tutorials/DNA isolation.html.
- 12.Telenti A, Marcehesi F, Marianne Balz. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:175–178. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.175-178.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chang CT, Wang LY, Liao CY, Hvang SP. Identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria existing in tap water by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:3159–3161. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.3159-3161.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Steingrube VA, Gibson JL, Brown BA, Zhang Y, Wilson RW, Rajagopalan M, et al. PCR amplification and restriction endonuclease analysis of a 65-kilodalton heat shock protein gene asquence for taxonomic separation of rapidly growing mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;33:149–153. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.1.149-153.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Brunello F, Ligozzi M. Identification of 54 mycobacterial species by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the hsp65 gene. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:2799–2806. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.8.2799-2806.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Turenne C, Tschetter L, Wolfe J, Kabani A. Necessity of quality-controlled 16S rRNA gene sequence databases: identifying nontuberculous mycobacterium species. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:3637–3648. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3637-3648.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nasr-Esfahani B, Sarikhani E, Moghim S, Faghri J, Fazeli H, Hoseini N, et al. Molecular characterization of environmental non-tuberculous mycobacteria using PCR- RFLP analysis of 441 Bp heat shock protein 65 fragments. Iran J Publ Health. 2012;41:108–114. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.lin C, Xue C, Ting ZC, Huan DB, Zhong ZJ. Identification of Mycobacterium marinum 65 ka heat shock protein gene by polymerase chain reaction restriction analysis from lesion of swimming pool granuloma. Chin Med J . 2006;119:43–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Derek A, Wong PC, YIP W. Simple and Rational Approach to the Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium avium complex species, and other commonly isolated mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:3768–3771. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.10.3768-3771.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Argueta C, Yoder S, Holtzman AE, Aronson TW, Glover N, Berlin OG, et al. Isolation and identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria. J Food Prot. 2000;63:930–933. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-63.7.930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wong DA, Yip PC, Tse DL, Tung VW, Cheung DT, Kam KM. Routine use of a simple low-cost genotypic assay for the identification of mycobacteria in a high throughput laboratory. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis . 2003;47:421–426. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(03)00133-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shin JH, Lee EJ, Lee HR, Ryu SM, Kim RH, Chang CL, et al. Prevalence of non tuberculosis mycobacteria in a hospital environment. J Hosp Infect. 2007;65:143–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


