Skip to main content
The Pan African Medical Journal logoLink to The Pan African Medical Journal
. 2012 Dec 25;13(Suppl 1):8.

Trachoma and its determinants in Mojo and Lume districts of Ethiopia

Kassahun Negash Yalew 1,&, Medhanit Getachew Mekonnen 1, Atsbha Asrat Jemaneh 1
PMCID: PMC3587019  PMID: 23467579

Abstract

Introduction

Trachoma is a public health problem in Ethiopia accounting for 35–50% of cases of blindness. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of trachoma and its determinant factors in Mojo and Lume districts.

Methods

A cross sectional community-based survey was conducted. From the two districts, a total of 23 clusters were selected by a multistage cluster random sampling technique. A total of 731 households were visited using structured questionnaires and clinical manifestation of trachoma was examined by ophthalmic nurses to assess stages of trachoma in children between ages 1 and 9 years and adults aged above 15 years.

Results

Among 431 examined children, 54(12.53%) had trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) and 43(9.98%) had trachomatous inflammation-intense. Among the adults we found 12 (1.68%) prevalence of trachomatous trichiasis. The presence of latrine (p=0.02), garbage disposal system (p=0.05), main source of water consumption (p=0.01) and keeping animals in the living room were found to be significant risk factors (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Prevalence of trachoma was found to be 12% which is higher than the WHO standard. The study also identified that there was significant association between the different stages of trachoma with risk factors such as source of water and keeping animals in the living room.

Keywords: Trachoma, risk factors, eye diseases, Ethiopia, blindness

Introduction

Visual impairment and blindness have been recognized worldwide as one of the major public health problems, especially in developing countries where most of the blind live and resources are minimal. According to WHO, globally about 37 million people are blind and 124 million people have low vision. Internationally, about a quarter of blindness is avoidable and is mainly caused by cataract and trachoma [1]. International actions to prevent avoidable blindness have been gaining attention over the recent decades. Vision 2020: “The Right to sight” is a global initiative launched in 1999 with the objective of eliminating the main causes of avoidable blindness by the year 2020 [1].

Trachoma is a bacterial illness caused by Chlamydia trachomatis. Typically this disease is associated with environmental factors and poor hygiene and is transmitted through contact with infected individual, contaminated water, or through flies that have come into contact with infected materials. Once an individual has been reinfected multiple times, the inside of the eyelid becomes scarred, forcing the eyelid to invert. The position of the eyelid causes the infected individual's eyelashes to scratch the cornea, causing permanent visual damage.

The burden of blindness in the Sub-Saharan Africa is the greatest of all the other regions of the world. Sub-Saharan Africa contains less than 10% of the world's people, but 20% of the world's blind. In contrast, countries with established market economies account for 15% of the global population, but only 6% of blindness [2]. The prevalence of blindness is 10-20 times greater in the developing countries than the developed countries. One country that possesses high rates of vision impairment is Ethiopia. Ethiopia is believed to have one of the world's highest rates of blindness and low vision. According to the Prevalence of Blindness, Low Vision, and Trachoma in Ethiopia from the total 75 million population, 1.2 million are blind, 2.8 million people have low vision, 9 million children of the age group 1-9 years have active trachoma, and 1.3 million adults live with trachomatous trichiasis (TT) [3]. More than a quarter of blindness in Ethiopia is either preventable or curable. According to the National Survey on Blindness, prevalence of blindness in Ethiopia is 1.6% (1.1% for urban and 1.6% for rural population) and low vision is 3.7% (2.6% for urban and 3.8% for rural). Blindness and low vision are more prevalent among females; 1.9% versus 1.2% for blindness, and 4.1% versus 3.1% for low vision. Prevalence of childhood blindness is 0.1% and accounts for 6% of the total blindness burden in Ethiopia [3].The major causes of blindness in Ethiopia are cataract (49.9%), trachomatous corneal opacity (11.5%), refractive error (7.8%), other corneal opacity (7.7%), glaucoma (5.2%) and macular degeneration (4.6%) [3]. The national prevalence of active trachoma either TF/TI for children in the age group 1-9 year is 40.1%. There is significant regional variation of active trachoma prevalence with the highest prevalence being in Amhara (5.2%). The national prevalence of trachomatous trichiasis (TT) for age group 15 and above in Ethiopia is 3.1%. Trachomatous trichiasis is highest in females compared to males (4.1% versus 1.6%). The prevalence of trachoma in Eastern Showa is not well known. This research was done to assess the prevalence of trachoma and its determinant factors in Lemu and Mojo districts.

Methods

Study Setting

East Shewa is one of the 28 administrative zones in the Oromia Region, located at the South-eastern escarpment with an estimated population of 1,278,362 in 2006/2007. The capital of the zone, Adama, is located at a distance of about 100 km east of Addis Ababa, on the main way to Harar and Dire Dawa in eastern Ethiopia. The zone has 12 districts, most of which are situated in the Great East African Rift Valley lakes region that crosses the country. In terms of ethnicity, the East Shewa Zone communities belong mainly to the Oromo ethnic group while more heterogeneous within the urban centers.

This study was conducted in two districts of the Oromiya Region, Lume and Mojo districts. According to, the 2007 National Census Report the districts have a total population of 117,080, and 450,412 respectively.

Study population

The population that was studied comprised children between one and nine years of age as well as adults older than 15 years.

Sample size calculation and sampling

A sample size estimated using a standard cross-sectional proportion sample size calculation formula is implemented. The expected prevalence of TF in conducted studies by Yemane was 41.4% [4]. Assuming that risk of the true prevalence was outside the confidence interval (5%), an alpha risk of 5%, and a z-score of 1.96; then the calculated sample size was 750.

Primary sampling unit

The primary sampling unit (PSU) for the survey was a kebele; each kebele is regarded as a cluster. At the districts level twenty clusters were selected, proportional to their size. The list of current kebeles in each district was obtained from the local administration. Then the proportion of children under 9 years was statistically interpolated. The following assumptions were adopted: 32% of the general population composed of those less than five years old and each household on average is comprised of five individuals. This figure was taken from the household distribution described in the Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey.

Kebeles that were not reached within half day walking from the nearest driving point were regarded as geographically inaccessible. Clusters inaccessible, due to insecurity or geographical barriers, were excluded from the survey prior to the selection of the clusters.

Data Analysis

During the data collection, supervisors watched over the data collectors on site and every evening checked the data for accuracy, consistency and completeness. The data was entered and analyzed using SPSS software (Version 19). The association between the risk factors and the different stages of trachoma were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-square test. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the determinant factors among the associated variables.

Results

Survey Description

From the two districts a total of 23 clusters/ kebeles were randomly selected; 5 clusters from Mojo and 18 clusters from Lume Districts. A total of 713 households were visited and clinically examined by Ophthalmic Nurses. 64% (454) of the total visited households had children in the age range 1-9 years and 431 all of them were selected for clinical examination; 79(18%) and 352(81%) from Mojo and Lume districts respectively. The distribution of household members by clusters and districts are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the respondents

Characteristic District Total
Mojo Lume
Number % Number % Number %
Sex of the respondent
   Male 35 23 196 35 231 32
   Female 115 77 367 65 482 68
Age group
   10-24 29 20 105 18 134 19
   25-40 75 49 274 49 349 49
    > 40 46 30 184 33 230 32
Status of the respondent in the HH
   Head of the HH 38 25 189 34 227 31.8
   Wife 95 64 311 55 406 56.9
   Son/daughter 17 11 63 11 80 11.2
Religion
   Orthodox 130 86 542 96 672 94.2
   Muslim 7 5 7 1 14 2.0
   Protestant 13 9 13 2 26 3.6
   Other 0 0 1 0 1 0.1
Educational Status
   Illiterate 41 27 339 60 380 53.3
   Can read and write 3 2 29 5 32 4.5
   1-4 grade completed 22 16 46 8 68 9.5
   5-8 grade completed 35 23 100 18 135 18.9
   9-12 grade completed 40 27 45 8 85 11.9
   College education 9 6 4 1 13 1.8
Occupation
   Farmer 7 5 405 70 412 57.8
   Daily laborer 41 27 72 13 113 15.8
   Government employee 40 27 12 2 52 7.3
   House wife 27 18 25 4 52 7.3
   Merchant 19 13 41 7 60 8.4
   Others 16 11 8 1 24 3.4

As portrayed in summary Table 1, most of the clusters/ kebeles had 4-6 members in their house hold. In general, 90(58%) of households had 4-6 members, 43(29%) 1-3 members and 17(11%) 7-9 members in their house.

Table 2 indicates that most of the clusters in Lume district had 4-6 family members. There were also Ketenas that had significant members (7-9); these included Kurma Fatolla, Tilty Gerbi and Tulured. On the other hand, Kunche and Ejersa Jorro among the ketanas with lower percentage contributors for the total family members of high family size categories i.e. 7-9 members compared to other ketanas. Out of the total surveyed household 284(50%) had 4-6 members 162(29%), 1-3 members and the remaining 21% had 7-9 members in their household.

Table 2.

Main source of water for the Household and estimated time taken

District Total
Mojo Lume
Number % Number % Number %
Source of water
 Pipe 149 99 492 87 641 90
 Protected well 1 1 46 8 47 7
 Unprotected well 0 0 1 0 1 0.1
 River 0 0 6 1 6 0.8
 Pond/surface water 0 0 13 2 13 1.8
 Others 0 0 5 1 5 0.7
Time taken to the source of water
 In compound 94 59 75 13 169 24
  <30mins 46 33 293 51 339 48
 30-59mins 9 7 164 29 173 24
 60-89mins 0 0 20 3 20 3
 2-4 hours 1 1 11 2 12 2

Household Characteristics

A total of 713 households were visited, 80% of them were enumerated in Lume district. The characteristics of the study participants of the household are presented below. Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of respondents. Of the total 713 respondents, 68% were females and the remaining 32% were males. The age distribution of the population surveyed showed that 19% of respondents were 10-24 years and the largest proportion of respondents (i.e. 49%) were 25-40 years old while the remaining population was above 40 years old. Among the individuals that participated in the survey, 227(31.8%) reported being the head of the household and 406(56.9%) of the respondents were house wives and 80(11.2%) participants were sons or daughters within the household.

House wives are the majority within the Lume District. 189(34%) of respondents reported being the head of a household while 63(11%) claimed to be a son/daughter. Majority of respondents in both Lume and Mojo districts were house wife respondents; 311(55%) and 95(64%) respectively. When analyzing religious backgrounds of participants, approximately 94.2% of the respondents were Orthodox Christian in both districts while the remaining 5.7% represented other religious followers.

Educational status of the respondents showed that 53% were illiterate, mostly within the Lume district (60%). These results showed that households in the urban areas, specifically in the Mojo district, are relatively more literate than those found in the rural areas. In the Mojo district, further analysis indicated that 23% and 27% of respondents completed primary school (grade 5-8) and high school respectively. Overall, the occupational status of the respondents revealed that 57.8% were farmers, while daily laborer, merchants, government employees and house wives were reported by the respondents according to their significance.

Main source of water and accessibility of water supply

As seen in Table 2, a majority of households obtained water primarily from pipes. However the average travel time to get this water source was less than 30 minutes. Moreover, more than 24% of respondents reported that they traveled 30 to 60 minutes to a water source. Pipe water is the main source of water for urban (Mojo) households (99%) while protected well water source is common in Lume (87%).

A majority of the households observed (90%) get drinking water from pipelines, followed by 7% from protected well and 0.1% from unprotected wells. Approximately 48% of the surveyed households traveled less than 30 minutes range of distance to use water for daily consumption. The availability of water in the compound was significantly higher in Mojo town (59%) compared to 13% in Lume district.

Sanitation status of the surveyed household

Based on Table 3, 32% of respondents kept their animals in the range of 1-3 meters of their house while 21% of animals were kept in the range of 4-6 meters. In general, 56% of the respondents (13% Mojo; 62% Lume) kept animals within range of less than 7 meters radius of their house. 68% kept animals separately from their living room in both district, 30% kept animals in their living room only at night and 15% kept animals in their living room for both day and night; most of them were from Mojo district. A majority of respondents (63.9%) primarily disposed of their garbage in open fields, followed by 29.2% of residents in both districts disposed of garbage in an uncovered pit.

Table 3.

Sanitation Status of Surveyed Household by District

District Total
Mojo Lume
Number % Number % Number %
Animals kept within 20m of the respondent house hold
  No 132 87 184 34 316 44.3
  Yes, 1-3m 10 7 216 38 226 31.7
  Yes, 4-6m 8 6 138 24 146 20.5
  Yes, 7m or more 0 0 25 4 25 3.5
Animals kept in the housegold of the respondent
  No, keep separately 16 68 293 68 309 68.1
  Yes, only night 2 9 134 31 136 30.0
  Yes, only day time 0 0 2 0 2 0.4
  Yes, both at night and day 5 23 2 0 7 1.5
Garbage disposal place
  In open field 54 37 397 71 451 63.9
  Uncovered pit 11 8 10 2 21 3.0
  Covered pit 56 38 150 27 206 29.2
  Other 26 18 2 7 28 4.0
Access to latrine
  No, use open field 11 7 156 28 167 23.4
  Yes, covered pit latrine 72 48 174 31 246 34.5
  Yes, uncovered pit latrine 67 45 232 41 299 41.9
  Yes, but not used currently 0 0 1 0 1 1
Who in the household, regularly use latrine
  Only adult 55 39 143 34 198 35
  Only children 85 61 275 66 360 64
  Both adult and children 0 0 1 0 1 0

Latrines were classified as covered pit latrines, uncovered pit latrines and open fields. A significant proportion of households reported that they had no access to latrine service and they used open fields 167(23.4%) while a considerable proportion (i.e. 299 (42%)) of households used uncovered pit latrine for human excreta disposal. Only 246 (35%) of the total respondents have reported that they had access to covered pit latrine. Almost two thirds, 360(64%) regular users of the covered pit latrines among the household members were children.

Face washing habit and facial cleanness

The face washing habit and facial cleanliness of Mojo and Lume districts is presented in Table 4. The frequency of face washing habit in both districts showed that 47%, 30% and 17% of respondents washed their face twice, three times and once in a day, respectively. Overall there is a similarity in the frequency in face washing practices in the two districts except there is a significant variation in practice of washing their face once a day in Lume than Mojo district.

Table 4.

Face washing habit and facial cleanness by District (not all responded)

District Total
Mojo Lume
Number % Number % No %
Frequency of face washing
  Once a day 7 6 102 20 109 17
  Twice a day 54 42 245 48 299 47
  Three times a day 43 34 148 29 191 30
  Once a week 1 0.8 2 0.4 3 0
  Others 23 18 10 2 33 5
Children use soap
  Yes 95 89 402 81 497 83
  No 12 11 93 19 105 17
Why wash their face more than once
  The area is dusty 31 36 171 51 202 48
  Believe we can prevent diseases 54 64 165 49 219 52

It is also observed that the majority of children (83%) have used soap to wash their face. The results also showed that the practice of children washing their face using soap between the two districts is almost similar. Asking the respondents about the reason for practicing face washing frequently showed that 52% answered that it was to to prevent disease while 48% revealed that it was to clean their face from dust. More urban dwellers believed that frequency of washing prevents disease than the rural dwellers.

Perceptions on trachoma as a major health problem

Table 5 shows the types of health problems, source of information delivered, and mechanisms of transmission between the two woredas. The distribution of the problem between the two woredas is more or less similar though there is a significant variation in the distribution of other health problems. Slightly more than a quarter, 181(26%) of the respondents believed that trachoma is a major health problem of the districts followed by malaria with 192(22%). On the contrary, significant respondents 408(58%) mentioned other health problems as major rather than the five mentioned health problems in the study.

Table 5.

Health problem by district and source of information on Trachoma and mechanisms of transmission

District Total
Mojo Lume
Number % Number % Number %
Major health problem in the area
  Malaria 7 4 185 34 192 22
  Tuberculosis 1 1 8 1 9 1
  Trachoma 35 24 146 27 181 26
  Diarrhea 7 4 56 10 63 9
  HIV/AIDS 11 7 5 1 16 2
  Others 111 75 297 54 252 58
Source of information for Trachoma
  Health Worker 54 40 146 31 200 33
  Health Extension Worker 19 14 140 30 159 26
  Media 56 41 181 39 237 39
  Family members 34 25 59 12 93 15
  Local leaders 0 0 6 1 6 1
Mechanisms of Trachoma transmission
  Flies 97 71 318 68 415 69
  Poor personal hygiene 79 58 194 41 273 45
  Poor environmental condition 28 21 89 19 117 19
  Other 4 3 6 1 10 2

The main mentioned sources of information about trachoma were media 237(39%), health worker 200(33%) and health extension worker with 26%. The distribution between the two districts is almost similar concerning media as a source of information while the other source of information showed slight variations between the districts. The primary transmission of trachoma is through flies according to the majority of the respondents (69%). The second major mechanism of transmission of trachoma mentioned by the respondents was poor personal hygiene 273(45%) followed by poor environmental condition 117(19%).

Major risk factors such as the availability of latrines, garbage disposal mechanisms, and the main water sources were assessed using a Chi-square test among children and adults respectively. The prevalence of TF and TI in the woredas was tested using a p-value =0.05 and the results showed that the rate of occurrence of TF and TI among children between 1-9 years old showed significant association among the following risk factor of availability of latrine, garbage disposal and keeping animals in the living room.

Prevalence and Determinant Factors of Trachoma

From 431 selected children for clinical examination, 54(12.53%) and 43(9.98%) of them were affected by TF and TI respectively. The prevalence of the different stages of trachoma (TS, TI and CO) among adults and the risk factors reported in the study showed that age was a factor which significantly affected the level of manifestation resulting in a p-value =0.01. Availability of latrine and TS stage of trachoma also had significant p-value of less than 0.05 while the remaining stages of trachoma (TI and CO) were insignificantly associated with the availability of latrines as a risk factor. Keeping animals in the main living room also has a significant association with the prevalence of TS and TI with significant p-values of .01 and .05, respectively. In general, 12(1.68%) of the respondents had contracted trichiasis and 4(0.6%) manifested corneal opacity (CO).

The other risk factor for the prevalence of trachoma (TI, TS and CO) identified in the study was the source used to obtain water. The p-value for TI, TS, and CO are 0.04, 0.02 and <0.001 respectively meaning that source of water was a significant factor with strong association to the three mentioned stages of trachoma. The overall rate of households who had TT surgery was lower (4%) in the districts. The distribution of TT surgery in the two woredas showed that in the rural areas (5%) there are higher surgery rates than the urban regions (0.7%). Among the people who have undertaken TT surgeries were 15 (50%). Fourteen (47%) of them reported positive sentiments concerning the surgeries, respectively while only 3% (1 person) of people were disappointed by the surgery. The majority of the respondents (90% (28)) received TT surgery in health facilities while only 10% (3) of people underwent surgery in a health post.

Table 6 shows facial cleanliness of adults by districts. Of the total number of households 66(9%) of members’ faces were unclean while 647(91%) cleaned their faces. The number of households who used azithromycin was analyzed, in which the frequency of azithromycin usage and the reason for usage of azithromycin were examined. Of the total respondents, 620(87%) of the households took azithromycin twice a day (70%) and 30% of azithromycin users only took the medication once a day. The majority of respondents (68%) mentioned the lack of the availability of azithromycin as a reason for only using it once in a day while 18% mentioned painful side effects associated with taking azithromycin. Fear of side effects was another reason for those who refused to use azithromycin and the major fear associated with those who did not take the medication was diarrhea (83%) and abdominal cramps 45%.

Table 6.

Distribution of the households taking azithromycin and frequency

District Total
Mojo Lume
Number % Number % Number %
Number of Household taking azithromycin 123 82 497 88 620 87
Frequency of azithromycin
  Only once 26 19 194 33 220 30
  Twice 111 81 398 67 509 70
Reasons for the Household member taking only once
  Painful 0 0 39 21 39 18
  They were not around 28 93 116 62 144 68
  Pregnancy 2 7 13 7 15 7
  Others 0 0 23 12 23 11
Reasons not taking azithromycin, fear of side effect
  Nausea 0 0 7 9 7 7
  Diarrhoea 5 38 39 48 44 46
  Vomiting 1 10 0 0 1 1
  Abdominal Cramp 8 52 35 43 43 45
  Others 0 0 1 1 1 1

Discussion

Trachoma is a communicable disease attributed to poor personal hygiene, environmental sanitation, and a lack of adequate and clean water supply. If left untreated, blindness can occur. The major causes of blindness are cataract (49.9%) and trachomatous corneal opacity (11.5%) [3].

According to this study conducted in the Lume and Mojo districts, the prevalence of TF for children between 1-9 years old is 13% which is much lower than the national prevalence of 40.1% [4]. In this same study trachomatous trichiasis (TT) in adults showed a much lower prevalence than the national standard (3.1% vs 1.68). However, the current prevalence is still higher compared to the WHO standard (<1% for TT) [1]. Trachoma is highly correlated with the availability of water and behavior towards face washing habit in the community. About six in every ten (62.4%) of the children had a clean face on examination; 72.5% households reported washing faces of children two or more times a day. This study showed that 77% of the respondents have a habit of washing their face 1-2 times a day [5].

More than half of the respondents in the study area keep animals less than 7m in the living room. Different literature stated that flies breed in and are likely to be attracted to rubbish dumps, bins, excreta including cow dung, decaying food and rotting carcasses. In this study, keeping animals in the house significantly related with the number of trachoma in the household and in the community in general. This may be related the animal dung to be a breeding site for the flies and also increases the exposure of children to the flies. Flies are attracted to red eyes with discharge, and carry the organism Chlamydia trachomatis to the eyes of others within a family or a community, both in children and adults [6].

Frontline health personnel can play key role in preventing and controlling blindness if they have good understanding of primary eye care (PEC) [8]. However, this research showed that 21% of the population has the opportunity to get information about trachoma in the study area. It is believed that health extension workers (HEW) can play a significant role in primary eye care if they are adequately trained and well motivated. However, there is little information on how HEWs can participate in community level promotion of eye health in Ethiopia.

Most medications that are taken come with some type of side effect. Some side effects may be greater than others, but all should be taken seriously. This study showed that about 18% of respondents are not willing to take azithromycin to prevent trachoma attributed to the fear of side effect.

Conclusion

Prevalence of trachoma manifested among the interviewed and clinically examined children and adults was found to be 12% and 1.68% respectively; figures that are higher than the WHO standard of less than 1%. It was also observed that the association between the different stages of trachoma with risk factor such as keeping animals in the living room and source of water was significant. There is need to develop a strategy to strengthen community based information and education through the existing health extension workers about trachoma. Primary school has to be a target place to educate children on personal and environmental hygiene particularly facial cleanness. Proper education and awareness has to be raised with regard to the misconception on zitromax side effect.Prevalence of trachoma manifested among the interviewed and clinically examined children and adults was found to be 12% and 1.68% respectively; figures that are higher than the WHO standard of less than 1%. It was also observed that the association between the different stages of trachoma with risk factor such as keeping animals in the living room and source of water was significant. There is need to develop a strategy to strengthen community based information and education through the existing health extension workers about trachoma. Primary school has to be a target place to educate children on personal and environmental hygiene particularly facial cleanness. Proper education and awareness has to be raised with regard to the misconception on zitromax side effect.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Rebecca Elliott for their invaluable assistance in preparing this article for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Kassahun Negash contributed in the design of the study, participated in the data collection, performed analysis and interpretation of data and drafted the paper and prepared the manuscript. Medhanit Getachew and Atsbha Asrat assisted in the design, approved the proposal with some revisions, participated in data analysis and revised subsequent drafts of the paper. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Geneva: WHO; 1997. Planning meeting for the Global Elimination of Trachoma: Geneva, November 25–26, 1996. WHO document WHO/PBL/97.60. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Thylefors B, Négrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, Dadzie KY. Global data on blindness. Bull World Health Organ. 1995;73(1):115–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berhane Y, Worku A, Bejiga A. National Blindness & Low Vision Survey; 2006. National survey on Blindness, Low Vision and Trachoma in Ethiopia; pp. 1–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yemane Berhane. Prevalence of Trachoma in Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2007;21(3) [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ngondi J, Matthews F, Reacher M, Baba S, Brayne C, Emerson P. Associations between active trachoma and community intervention with Antibiotics, Facial cleanliness, and Environmental improvement (A,F,E) PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008 Apr 30;2(4):e229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Amza A, Goldschmidt P, Einterz E, Huguet P, Olmiere C. The prevention and management of trachoma. Africa Health. 2010 Jan [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yewubnesh Hailu, Abeba Tekilegiorgis. Assegid Aga Know-how of primary eye care among Health Extension Workers (HEWs) in Southern Ethiopia; [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Pan African Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Pan African Medical Journal

RESOURCES