Abstract
Objective
Recently, we have shown that the (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole is more dependent on CYP2C19 metabolic status than (−)-[13C]-pantoprazole. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole is a more sensitive and selective probe for evaluating CYP2C19 enzyme activity than the racemic mixture.
Methods
(+)-[13C]-Pantoprazole (95 mg) was administered orally in a sodium bicarbonate solution to healthy volunteers. Breath and plasma samples were collected before and up to 720 minutes after dosing. The 13CO2 in exhaled breath samples was measured by infrared spectrometry. Ratios of 13CO2/12CO2 after (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole relative to 13CO2/12CO2 at baseline were expressed as delta over baseline (DOB). (+)-[13C]-Pantoprazole concentrations were measured by HPLC. Genomic DNA extracted from whole blood was genotyped for CYP2C19*2, *3 and *17 using Taqman assays.
Results
Statistically significant differences in the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUCplasma(0-∞) (p<0.001) and oral clearance (<0.01) of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole as well as in the breath test indices [delta over baseline, DOB30; and area under the DOB versus time curve, AUCDOB(0-120)] (p<0.01) were observed among poor, intermediate and extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19. DOB30 and AUCDOB(0-120) adequately distinguished poor metabolizer from intermediate and extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19. Breath test indices significantly correlated with plasma elimination parameters of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole (Pearson correlations: −0.68 to −0.73). Although relatively higher breath test indices were observed after administration of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole (present study) than after (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole (previous study), the performance of the racemic and the enantiomer as marker of CYP2C19 activity remained similar.
Conclusions
Our data confirm that the metabolism of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole is highly dependent on CYP2C19 metabolic status, but the breath test derived from it is not superior to the racemic [13C]-pantoprazole in evaluating CYP2C19 activity in vivo. Thus, racemic [13C]-pantoprazole which is relatively easy to synthesis and more stable than (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole is adequate as a probe of this enzyme.
Introduction
The human cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 is a clearance mechanism for several clinically important drugs, including those with a narrow therapeutic range(1–3). This enzyme is also critical in the metabolism of some prodrugs such as clopidogrel(4) cyclophosphamide(5, 6) and thalidomide(7) to pharmacologically active metabolites. The activity of this enzyme varies widely among individuals, leading to substantial differences in the clearance or metabolic activation of its substrates among patients. This variability is mainly controlled by functionally relevant genetic variations in the CYP2C19 gene coding for the enzyme(1–3). In addition, nongenetic factors that include exposure to drugs that directly inhibit the CYP2C19 enzyme or enhance its expression contribute to this variability. It follows that knowledge of CYP2C19 metabolic status is important to optimize therapy and avoid adverse effects of drugs metabolized by this enzyme. A current limitation to using pharmacogenetics guided therapy is that it does not capture effects of nongenetic factors on phenotype. In the past, researchers have used phenotypic assays to capture the effect genetic and nongenetic factors have on the metabolism by using enzyme selective probe drug. However, phenotyping enzyme activity using probe drugs has not been practical and unavailabile in the clinical setting in the past because of the invasive and time intensive nature of such an approach. . The need for a rapid, point of care phenotyping assay that is safe and reliable would enable clinicians to personalize therapy and avoid costly adverse reactions or sub-optimal therapy.
Recently, we and others have tested and demonstrated that stable isotope labeled racemic (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole breath test is a promising tool to assess CYP2C19 metabolic status(8–11). This test has a number of practical advantages (captures genetic and nongenetic causes of CYP2C19 activity, non-invasive, easy and rapid to perform) and has the potential to offer greater clinical utility than existing approaches (e.g. genetic tests alone).
Studies have shown that the pharmacokinetics of unlabelled pantoprazole is enantioselective and that the (+)-enantiomer is more dependent on CYP2C19 activity than the (−)-enantiomer of pantoprazole(11, 12). In our most recent publication, we confirmed enantioselective elimination of the stable isotope labeled pantoprazole given as a racemic mixture and observed that (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole is preferentially metabolized by CYP2C19 compared to (−)-[13C]-pantoprazole and, based on pharmacokinetic parameters, that this enantiomer can separate extensive metabolizers (EM) or intermediate metabolizers (IM) from poor metabolizers (PM)(11). These data raise the possibility that (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole breath test may be a better marker of CYP2C19 than the racemic mixture.
In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that the rate of O-demethylation of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole, as measured by exhaled 13CO2, is a rapid marker of hepatic CYP2C19 activity in vivo in humans and that administering (+)-[13C]-labeled pantoprazole alone may be better at separating the IM subjects from the EM subjects by measuring (+)-[13C]-labeled pantoprazole after administration of the (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole racemate. To test this hypothesis, we determined (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole breath test indices and pharmacokinetics in a separate cohort of healthy volunteers genotyped for common CYP2C19 genetic variants. The (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole breath test results from this study were compared with (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole breath test data obtained from our previous publication (8).
Methods
Study Subjects
A total of 15 healthy male (7) and female (8) volunteers of Asian origin (18–49 years old, with body weight of at least 110 pounds and body mass index ≤ 30) and pre-genotyped for CYP2C19*2, *3, and *17 alleles were studied at the outpatient clinic of the Indiana University School of the Medicine Indiana Clinical Research Center (ICRC). We choose to enroll Asian subjects in this study to increase our odds of recruiting PM, since the Asian population has a higher incidence of PM (~30% in Asians versus 10% in Caucasians). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Indiana University. Investigative Device Exemption application G070004 to conduct the study was also approved by the Food and Drug Administration. This trial was registered at http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT00668902). All study subjects provided written informed consent before participation. Details of the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the participants were similar to our previous study with (±)-pantoprazole(8, 11).
Study Design
This was an open-label, single-dose clinical trial. Eligible subjects were administered a single 95mg oral dose of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole sodium- (4-O-[methyl-13C]-pantoprazole, 99%; CLM-7831-SP; lot#. PR-17177; Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc., Andover, MA), with 2.1 g sodium bicarbonate to prevent degradation by stomach acid. Breath samples were collected at baseline and at 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 300, 480, 600 and 720 minutes (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole administration. Venous blood samples (10 ml) were collected in parallel at baseline and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole administration. Plasma was separated by centrifugation and stored at −80°C until use.
CYP2C19 Genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from human whole blood with the QIAGEN DNA MiniKit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) and genotyping for the CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*3, and CYP2C19*17 alleles was carried out by TaqMan Assay-Reagents Allelic Discrimination Kits (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as previously described(8, 11).
Quantitation of 13CO2
The concentrations of 13CO2 and 12CO2 in exhaled breath samples were determined using the UBiT-IR300 IR spectrometry (Meretek Diagnostics, Rockville, MD) equipped with interference filters that are wavelength-selective for the absorbance of 13CO2 and 12CO2. Enrichment of 13CO2 in expired air was calculated at each sampling point. The delta over baseline (DOB) in the 13CO2/12CO2 ratio after (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole relative to predose (baseline) 13CO2/12CO2 ratio was calculated as described elsewhere by our group(8, 11).
Measurement of [13C]-Pantoprazole
Plasma concentrations of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole were measured using a previously described method, with slight modification(8, 11). Plasma samples were extracted with 6 ml of ethyl acetate, after the addition of 20 μl of internal standard (50 μg/ml phenacetin) and 250 μl of 2% ammonium hydroxide. The samples were then vortexed and spun and the resultant supernatant was transferred to a new tube to be evaporated. The dried residue was reconstituted with 100 μl of acetonitrile and 50 μl were injected onto the HPLC. Separation was performed using a Chiralcel OJ-RH column (4.6mmx150mm) (Chiral Technologies Inc. West Chester, PA) and a mobile phase consisting of 75% 50mM sodium perchlorate and 25% acetonitrile (flow rate, 0.5 ml/min). Analytes were detected by UV at 290nm.
Quantification of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole was performed using a standard curve generated in blank plasma. The limit of quantification of the assay was 0.025 μg/ml. The inter-day and intraday coefficient of variation (% CV) of the assay was less than 20%.
Analysis of Breath Test Indices and Pharmacokinetics
(+)-[13C]-Pantoprazole breath test indices and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by fitting the DOB or plasma concentration data to a standard noncompartmental analysis using WinNonlin professional software (version 5.01; Pharsight, Mountain View, CA) as described before(8, 11).
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were summarized by groups using descriptive statistics. Differences in pharmacokinetic parameters and breath test indices among different genotypes of CYP2C19 were analyzed by the ANOVA test with Dunnett's multiple comparison post-test assuming the subjects were sampled from a Gaussian population. Pearson's correlation analysis was performed to determine correlations between (+)-[13C]-Pantoprazole breath indices and pharmacokinetic parameters. In order to assess the performance of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole breath test as marker of CYP2C19 activity against the racemic preparation, breath test parameters obtained previously in EM, IM and PM of CYP2C19 after the administration of racemic pantoprazole [(±)-[13C]-pantoprazole] (8) were compared with those breath test parameters obtained following the administration of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole (present study). All statistical tests were conducted using PASW Statistics 17.0 (SPSS Software Inc., Chicago, IL). A p-value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
In this study, 14 subjects had both pharmacokinetic and breath test indices and were included for analysis. The genotype predicted CYP2C19 phenotypes were: 3 PM (*2/*2), 6 IM (*1/*2, n=5; and *2/*17, n=1) and 5 EM of CYP2C19 (*1/*1, n=4; and *1/*17, n=1). One subject was a no call (genotype indeterminate) and was excluded from the analysis.
The plasma concentration time profile of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole in the three groups of genotypes is shown in Figure 1. The corresponding pharmacokinetic parameters are listed in Table 1. Statistically significant differences in the plasma elimination half-life, area under the plasma concentration time curve [AUCplasma(0-∞) and AUCplasma(0-720)] (p<0.001 ANOVA), oral clearance (p<0.01), Cmax and weight adjusted oral clearance (p<0.05) of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole were observed among the 3 genotypes [PM (n=3), IM (n=6), EM (n=5)]. Post-hoc analysis showed that PMs had a significantly longer half-life (p<0.001), and higher AUCplasma(0-∞) (p<0.001) and Cmax (p<0.01), and lower oral clearance (p<0.01) than EM subjects; a longer half-life (p<0.001), and higher AUC(0-∞) (p<0.001), was observed between IMs versus PMs. Only oral clearance (p<0.05) was lower in IMs versus EMs (Table 1).
Figure 1.
Mean (±S.D.) of the plasma concentration versus time curves of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole after administration of a single 95 mg oral dose of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole sodium salt to healthy volunteers with PM (n=3), IM (n=6) and EM (n=5) genotypes of CYP2C19.
Table 1.
Mean (95% C.I.) pharmacokinetic parameters (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole after a single 95 mg oral dose of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole in PM, IM and EM genotypes.
| PM (n=3) | IM (n=6) | EM (n=5) | ANOVAa (p value) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tplasmamax (median) (min)§ | 30 (30,30) | 30 (30,30) | 30 (30,30) | |
| Cmax (μg/ml) | 11.19 (2.75,19.63) | 7.51 (5.29,9.73) | 4.85## (2.07,7.63) | <0.05 |
| T1/2 (min) | 564.4*** (360.1,768.8) | 66.6 (54.9,78.3) | 49.0### (28.8,69.3) | <0.001 |
| AUCplasma0-∞ (μg*min/hr) | 7257.1*** (−1279.8,15794.0) | 774.8 (458.1,1091.5) | 417.9### (−17.9,853.6) | <0.001 |
| AUCplasma0-720 (μg*min/hr) | 4154.3*** (227.8,8080.8) | 770.8 (453.8,1087.9) | 416.8### (−18.8,852.4) | <0.001 |
| Vd/F (L) | 11.69 (3.36,20.01) | 12.98 (8.58,17.38) | 20.48 (11.31,29.64) | 0.069 |
| Cl/F (L/min) | 0.892 (0.046,1.738) | 8.516@ (4.634,12.398) | 19.938## (6.333,33.542) | <0.01 |
| Cl/F*kg (L/min*kg) | 0.0145 (0.0048,0.0243) | 0.1413 (0.0671,0.2155) | 0.3349# (0.0913,0.5786) | <0.05 |
PM vs. IM :
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001
IM vs. EM :
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001
PM vs. EM :
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001
One-Way ANOVA with Dunnett 2-Sided
Tmax [Median (min, max)]
Abbreviations: AUCplasma, area under the plasma concentration time curve; CL/F, oral clearance, Vd/F, distribution volume, Cmax, maximum concentration; Tplasmamax, time to Cmax; PM, poor metabolizer; IM, intermediate metabolizer and EM, extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
The breath test profile of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole in the three groups of genotypes is shown in Figure 2. The corresponding breath test indices are listed in Table 2. All of the indices were statistically significant, except the area under the Delta Over Baseline (DOB) versus time curve, AUCDOB(0-∞), (p=0.56). Post-hoc analysis showed that PMs had a significantly longer Tmax (p<0.01), lower maximumDelta Over Baseline (DOBmax) (p<0.01), lower DOBat 120 minutes (DOB120) (p<0.001) and lower area under the DOB versus time curve, AUCDOB(0-120), (p<0.01) than EM subjects. A longer time to maximum DOB (TmaxDOB) (p<0.01), a lower DOB at 120 minutes (DOB120) (p<0.01) and a lower AUCDOB(0-120), (p<0.05) was observed when IMs were compared to PMs. No difference was observed between IMs versus EMs.
Figure 2.
Mean (±S.D.) of the breath test delta over baseline versus time curves of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole after administration of a single 95 mg oral dose of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole sodium-salt to healthy volunteers with PM (n=3), IM (n=6) and EM (n=5) genotypes of CYP2C19.
Table 2.
Mean (±95% C.I.) breath test parameters after a single 95 mg oral dose of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole in PM, IM and EM genotypes.
| PM (n=3) | IM (n=6) | EM (n=5) | ANOVAa (p value) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDOBmax (minutes)§ | 240** (50,240) | 30 (25,60) | 30## (20,30) | <0.01 |
| Delta Over Baseline at 120 minutes (DOB120) | 0.73** (0.45,1.02) | 3.92 (2.59,5.24) | 4.82### (3.33,6.31) | <0.01 |
| Maximum Delta Over Baseline (DOBmax) | 1.80 (−0.41,4.01) | 5.43 (3.44,7.43) | 7.54## (4.25,10.83) | <0.05 |
| AUCDOB(0-120) (minutes*DOB) | 88.0* (0.6,175.4) | 499.5 (307.4,691.6) | 659.9## (402.6,917.2) | <0.01 |
| AUCDOB(0-∞) (minutes*DOB) | 1768.1 (−1234.5,4770.8) | 2167.7 (981.8,3353.6) | 2583.4 (1611.0,3555.8) | 0.56 |
PM vs. IM :
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001
IM vs. EM :
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001
PM vs. EM :
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001
One-Way ANOVA with Dunnett 2-Sided
Tmax [Median (min,max)]
Abbreviations: DOB, delta over baseline; AUCDOB, area under the DOB versus time curve, DOBmax, maximum DOB; TDOBmax, time to DOBmax; PM, poor metabolizer; IM, intermediate metabolizer and EM. extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
Correlation analyses between (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole pharmacokinetic parameters and breath test indices are listed in Table 3. Statistically significant correlations were observed with the elimination of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole enantiomer, again pointing towards a much bigger role of CYP2C19 in (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole elimination and breath test indices. For example, DOB30 and AUCDOB(0-120) were more significantly correlated with AUCplasma(0-∞) of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole (Pearson correlations: −0.68 & −0.73) (Table 3 & Figure 3).
Table 3.
Correlations between pharmacokinetic parameters of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole and breath test indices.
| Pearson (r) (p value) | T1/2 Plasma (hr) | AUCplasma(0-∞)(μg*hr/ml) | Vd/F Plasma (L) | Cl/F*kg Plasma (L/hr*kg) | DOB(0-120) Breath | DOBmax Breath | AUCDOB(0-120) Breath (min*D0B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cmax (μg/ml) | 0.718 (<0.01) | 0.804 (<0.01) | −0.845 (<0.0 01) | −0.819 (<0.001) | −0.655 (<0.05) | −0682 (<0.01) | −0.678 (<0.01) |
| T1/2 (hr) | 0.984 (<0.001) | −0.382 (0.177) | −0.566 (<0.05) | −0.814 (<0.001) | −0.704 (<0.01) | −0.771 (<0.01) | |
| AUCplasma(0-∞) (μg*hr/ml) | −0.450 (0.107) | −0.549 (<0.05) | −0.761 (<0.01) | −0.675 (<0.01) | −0.728 (<0.01) | ||
| Vd/F (L) | 0.902 (<0.001) | 0.471 (0.089) | 0.614 (<0.05) | 0.562 (<0.05) | |||
| Cl/F*kg (L/hr*kg) | 0.634 (<0.05) | 0.779 (<0.01) | 0.732 (<0.01) | ||||
| DOB(0-120) Breath) | 0.919 (<0.001) | 0.965 (<0.001) | |||||
| DOBmax Breath | 0.977 (<0.001) |
Data were analyzed using Pearson's Correlation Test. P<0.05 was considered significant.
Abbreviations: DOB, delta over baseline; AUCDOB, area under the DOB versus time curve, DOBmax, maximum DOB; Tmax, time to DOBmax; AUCplasma, area under the plasma concentration time curve; CL/F, oral clearance, Vd/F, distribution volume, Cmax, maximum concentration; Tplasmamax; time to Cmax
Figure 3.
Correlation of Maximal Delta Over Baseline (DOB30) with AUC(0-720) of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole after administration of a single 95 mg oral dose of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole sodium salt- to healthy volunteers with PM (n=3), IM (n=6) and EM (n=5) genotypes of CYP2C19.
The two substrates (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole and (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole have identical breath curves for all three genotypes EM, IM and PM. The only difference is higher generation of 13CO2 by O-demethylation with (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole than (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole, but neither substrate can differentiate between EM's and IM's for CYP2C19 enzyme activity (phenotype) (Table 4 and Figure 4). Both substrates reliably identified genetic PM from EM and IM. This was predicted as (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole is preferentially O-demethylated over (−)-[13C]-pantoprazole.
Table 4.
Comparison of the breath test parameters obtained after the administration of (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole with those from (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole for EMs, IMs and PMs.
| Substrate | Genotype Subjects | DOB30 Mean (±95% C.I.) | AUCDOB0-120 Mean (±95% C.I.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| (±)-[13C]-Pantoprazole | EM (n=10) | 4.3 (3.2,5.5) | 6.4 (5.0,7.7) |
| (+)-[13C]-Pantoprazole | EM (n=5) | 7.1 (4.8,9.5) | 10.4 (7.4,13.4) |
| (±)-[13C]-Pantoprazole | IM (n=10) | 3.3 (2.6,3.9) | 5.3 (4.2,6.3) |
| (+)-[13C]-Pantoprazole | IM (n=6) | 5.3 (3.7,6.9) | 8.2 (5.8,10.6) |
| (±)-[13C]-Pantoprazole | PM (n=4) | 0.7 (0.6,0.8) | 1.0 (0.8,1.3) |
| (+)-[13C]-Pantoprazole | PM (n=3) | 0.5 (0.0,1.0) | 1.5 (0.9,2.1) |
Data of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole were from the present study and those of racemic (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole were derived from Desta et al., (8)
Abbreviations: DOB30, delta over baseline after probe administration; AUCDOB, area under the DOB versus time curve, DOBmax, maximum DOB; TDOBmax, time to DOBmax; PM, poor metabolizer; IM, intermediate metabolizer and EM, extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.
Figure 4.
Average Breath Curves for (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole and (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole in healthy volunteers with PM, IM and EM genotypes of CYP2C19. [data for the racemic pantoprazole is from Desta et al](8)
DOB30 values correlated well with AUCDOB(0-120) for both substrates (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole (r2 = 0.99) and (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole (r2 = 0.96) (data not shown) also proving that a single time point breath collection is adequate in evaluating CYP2C19 enzyme activity.
DOB30 values reflecting CYP2C19 enzyme activity (phenotype) correlate significantly (p< 0.01) with AUCplasma(0-720) of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole obtained when (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole (r2 = 0.57) or (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole (r2 = 0.45) was administered.
Discussion
In previous reports(8, 11), we have shown that the (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole breath test indices and pharmacokinetics were significantly associated with CYP2C19 genotypes, suggesting a major role of CYP2C19 in the metabolism of (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole. Since pantoprazole is a chiral molecule and its pharmacokinetics (isotope labeled and unlabeled) show enantioselectivity(13), with (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole dependent on CYP2C19 than (−)-[13C]-pantoprazole, we tested whether (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole metabolism is a more selective probe of CYP2C19 activity in vivo. In the present study, we have demonstrated that: a)CYP2C19 genotypes are significantly associated with (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole elimination and with breath test indices derived from it; and b) the elimination of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole correlates significantly with breath test indices. These data and our previous report suggest that incorporation of the [13C]-label at the O-methyl site of pantoprazole does not alter the metabolic patterns or its stereoselective elimination.
Pantoprazole undergo hepatic clearance via mainly O-demethylation and to some extent through sulfoxidation and 6-hydroxylation(14, 15). In vitro data indicate that pantoprazole O-demethylation is catalyzed predominantly by CYP2C19(16). In humans, the plasma concentrations of O-demethylated metabolite of pantoprazole has been shown to be significantly influenced by CYP2C19 genotypes(14). The contribution of these pathways to the elimination of (+)- and (−)-pantoprazole appears to be different in that (+)-pantoprazole is more efficiently cleared by O-demethylation while (−)-pantoprazole undergo relatively higher sulfoxidation and 6-hydroxylations(15). Using isotope unlabeled pantoprazole, Tanaka et al., (13) have demonstrated marked stereoselective metabolism of pantoprazole in healthy volunteers, with (+)-pantoprazole being more dependent on CYP2C19 metabolic status than (−)-pantoprazole. Recently, we analyzed the stereoselective metabolism of [13C]-pantoprazole and have confirmed marked stereoselectivity(11) and, consistent with findings from isotope-unlabeled pantoprazole (13), we have demonstrated that (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole was more dependent on CYP2C19 genotype than (−)-[13C]-pantoprazole. These data suggest that (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole is mainly cleared by O-demethylation and that this pathway is predominantly catalyzed by CYP2C19, while multiple pathways including O-demethylation (CYP2C19), sulfoxidation (CYP3A) and 6-hydroxylation (unknown enzyme) may contribute to the overall elimination of (−)-pantoprazole (14, 15, 17, 18). Consistent with the major role of CYP2C19 in (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole elimination compared to that of (−)-[13C]-pantoprazole, better correlation of (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole breath test indices were observed with the elimination of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole than with that of (−)-[13C]-pantoprazole when all data were considered or PMs were excluded(11). Despite this, it is interesting to note that the correlations of breath test indices with the exposure of the (+)-enantiomer (Pearson r= −0.68 & −0.73) are not perfect (present study), but nonetheless an improvement over our previous publication (Pearson r= −0.46 and −0.68)(11).
One unexpected result was the long tail in the breath test pharmacokinetic data 240 minutes after dosing. Our results suggest that [13C] is distributed with time into the carbon pool of the body. It is possible that this observation could involve sequential metabolism (O-demethylation) of pantoprazole sulfone, but this route is highly unlikely to contribute as it accounts for less than 20% of the overall metabolism of pantoprazole(17). However, the possibility of reduced sensitivity of this drug as a CYP2C19 probe due to metabolic switching to the sulfoxidation pathway when CYP3A inducers are co-administered with (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole cannot be excluded. The possibility that chiral inversion to (−)-[13C]-pantoprazole (less dependent on CYP2C19) may contribute to the delayed peak of the breath test is also unlikely as no (−)-[13C]-pantoprazole was detected when plasma samples of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole were analyzed (data not shown).
The optimal clinical utility of the pantoprazole breath test in evaluating CYP2C19 enzyme activity depends on the rapidness and ease of the test. Ideally, this test should allow reliable measurement of CYP2C19 activity during the first pass metabolism of pantoprazole with a single time point breath collection post ingestion of substrate. The DOB30 time point differentiates PM's from IMs and EMs with both substrates. Although the (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole generates higher 13CO2 (present study) than when the (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole is used(11), it cannot differentiate IMs and EMs any better (Figure 4). Multiple breath sample collections post [13C]-pantoprazole ingestion with either substrate is not necessary in evaluating the CYP2C19 enzyme activity. The DOB30 correlates well with AUCDOB(0-120) with either substrate as well as the AUCplasma(0-720) of plasma pantoprazole (Table 4). Having a single time point is useful in the clinical setting as it alleviates the need for multiple sampling and 30 minutes is sufficiently long enough to differentiate poor metabolizers but also quick enough to allow timely decision in the clinic.
As described above, the DOB values are higher when (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole is used as a substrate compared to that of (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole. However, the sodium salt of (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole has very poor stability (less than 3 months as an aqueous solution) while the racemic (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole sodium salt sesquihydrate is stable as a powder and hence can be formulated into suitable oral preparations (capsules or tablets). Given that breath test from the two substrates adequately separate PM from IM and EM and failed to adequately separate IM from EM, this formulation limitation must also be taken into account when deciding the clinical development or utility of pantoprazole breath test for evaluating CYP2C19 enzyme activity.
Conclusions
Previously, we have performed a feasibility study showing that (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole breath test is a reliable marker of CYP2C19 activity in healthy volunteers. While this test completely discriminated PM from EM and IM of CYP2C19, there was a significant overlap between EM and IM of CYP2C19, which could be due to differences in the quantitative contribution of CYP2C19 and pathways towards the different enantiomers. The data from the present study indicate that (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole metabolism is highly dependent on CYP2C19 enzyme activity. However, the (+)-[13C]-pantoprazole was not a better marker of CYP2C19 activity than (±)-[13C]-pantoprazole breath test because it did not discriminate EM from IM of CYP2C19. Given these data and challenges for the synthesis, formulation and stability, the (+)-[13C]-enantiomer is not superior to the racemic [13C]-pantoprazole as a diagnostic probe for CYP2C19.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health National Institute of General Medical Sciences [Grants T32GM008425, R01GM078501]; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals Company [Grant-in-aid; Tokyo, Japan]; and the National Institutes of Health National Center for Research Resources [Grant MO1-RR000750].
Footnotes
Competing Interest Z.D., A.M., and D.A.F. are co-owners of a patent on a clinical test designed to determine CYP2C19 activity using the [13C]-pantoprazole breath test (patent #: US 7,833,744 B2). D.A.F. has served as a paid consultant for Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN. A.M. is employed by Cambridge Isotope Laboratories which manufactures the 13C substrate used in the study for the breath test. Commercialization of the pantoprazole breath test could be financially beneficial to the company.
The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Desta Z, Zhao X, Shin JG, Flockhart DA. Clinical significance of the cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(12):913–58. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200241120-00002. PubMed PMID: 12222994. Epub 2002/09/12. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rosemary J, Adithan C. The pharmacogenetics of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19: ethnic variation and clinical significance. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Jan;2(1):93–109. doi: 10.2174/157488407779422302. PubMed PMID: 18690857. Epub 2008/08/12. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goldstein JA. Clinical relevance of genetic polymorphisms in the human CYP2C subfamily. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Oct;52(4):349–55. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01499.x. PubMed PMID: 11678778. Pubmed Central PMCID: 2014584. Epub 2001/10/27. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hulot JS, Bura A, Villard E, Azizi M, Remones V, Goyenvalle C, et al. Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism is a major determinant of clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy subjects. Blood. 2006 Oct 1;108(7):2244–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-04-013052. PubMed PMID: 16772608. Epub 2006/06/15. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chang TK, Yu L, Goldstein JA, Waxman DJ. Identification of the polymorphically expressed CYP2C19 and the wild-type CYP2C9-ILE359 allele as low-Km catalysts of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide activation. Pharmacogenetics. 1997 Jun;7(3):211–21. doi: 10.1097/00008571-199706000-00006. PubMed PMID: 9241661. Epub 1997/06/01. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Takada K, Arefayene M, Desta Z, Yarboro CH, Boumpas DT, Balow JE, et al. Cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetics as a predictor of toxicity and clinical response to pulse cyclophosphamide in lupus nephritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Jul;50(7):2202–10. doi: 10.1002/art.20338. PubMed PMID: 15248218. Epub 2004/07/13. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li Y, Hou J, Jiang H, Wang D, Fu W, Yuan Z, et al. Polymorphisms of CYP2C19 gene are associated with the efficacy of thalidomide based regimens in multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2007 Sep;92(9):1246–9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.11319. PubMed PMID: 17666363. Epub 2007/08/02. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Desta Z, Modak A, Nguyen PD, Lemler SM, Kurogi Y, Li L, et al. Rapid identification of the hepatic cytochrome P450 2C19 activity using a novel and noninvasive [13C]pantoprazole breath test. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009 Apr;329(1):297–305. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.147751. PubMed PMID: 19136640. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2670589. eng. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Furuta T, Iwaki T, Umemura K. [13C]pantoprazole breath test as a predictor of the anti-platelet function of clopidogrel. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 May;66(5):457–63. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0807-4. PubMed PMID: 20349052. Epub 2010/03/30. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Furuta T, Kodaira C, Nishino M, Yamade M, Sugimoto M, Ikuma M, et al. [13C]-pantoprazole breath test to predict CYP2C19 phenotype and efficacy of a proton pump inhibitor, lansoprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Aug;30(3):294–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04044.x. PubMed PMID: 19459830. Epub 2009/05/23. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Thacker DL, Modak A, Nguyen PD, Flockhart DA, Desta Z. Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of stable isotope (+/−)-[(13) C]-pantoprazole: Implications for a rapid screening phenotype test of CYP2C19 activity. Chirality. 2011 Sep; doi: 10.1002/chir.21011. PubMed PMID: 21935988. ENG. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tanaka M, Ohkubo T, Otani K, Suzuki A, Kaneko S, Sugawara K, et al. Stereoselective pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, in extensive and poor metabolizers of S-mephenytoin. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Mar;69(3):108–13. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2001.113723. PubMed PMID: 11240974. Epub 2001/03/10. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tanaka M, Yamazaki H, Hakusui H, Nakamichi N, Sekino H. Differential stereoselective pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor in extensive and poor metabolizers of pantoprazole--a preliminary study. Chirality. 1997;9(1):17–21. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-636X(1997)9:1<17::AID-CHIR4>3.0.CO;2-D. PubMed PMID: 9094198. Epub 1997/01/01. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tanaka M, Ohkubo T, Otani K, Suzuki A, Kaneko S, Sugawara K, et al. Metabolic disposition of pantoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, in relation to S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation phenotype and genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Dec;62(6):619–28. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9236(97)90081-3. PubMed PMID: 9433390. Epub 1998/01/20. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xie Z, Zhang Y, Xu H, Zhong D. Pharmacokinetic differences between pantoprazole enantiomers in rats. Pharm Res. 2005 Oct;22(10):1678–84. doi: 10.1007/s11095-005-6807-x. PubMed PMID: 16180125. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pfizer Protonix package inser. 2012 [cited 2012 Nov 5.]. Available from: http://labeling.pfizer.com/showlabeling.aspx?id=135.
- 17.Andersson T. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions of acid pump inhibitors. Focus on omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996 Jul;31(1):9–28. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199631010-00002. PubMed PMID: 8827397. Epub 1996/07/01. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Andersson T, Weidolf L. Stereoselective disposition of proton pump inhibitors. Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(5):263–79. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200828050-00001. PubMed PMID: 18407713. Epub 2008/04/15. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]