Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Molecular and Cellular Biology logoLink to Molecular and Cellular Biology
. 1994 Jun;14(6):3863–3875. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.3863

Fine-resolution mapping of spontaneous and double-strand break-induced gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals reversible mitotic conversion polarity.

D B Sweetser 1, H Hough 1, J F Whelden 1, M Arbuckle 1, J A Nickoloff 1
PMCID: PMC358753  PMID: 8196629

Abstract

Spontaneous and double-strand break (DSB)-induced gene conversion was examined in alleles of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ura3 gene containing nine phenotypically silent markers and an HO nuclease recognition site. Conversions of these alleles, carried on ARS1/CEN4 plasmids, involved interactions with heteroalleles on chromosome V and were stimulated by DSBs created at HO sites. Crossovers that integrate plasmids into chromosomes were not detected since the resultant dicentric chromosomes would be lethal. Converted alleles in shuttle plasmids were easily transferred to Escherichia coli and analyzed for marker conversion, facilitating the characterization of more than 400 independent products from five crosses. This analysis revealed several new features of gene conversions. The average length of DSB-induced conversion tracts was 200 to 300 bp, although about 20% were very short (less than 53 bp). About 20% of spontaneous tracts also were also less than 53 bp, but spontaneous tracts were on average about 40% longer than DSB-induced tracts. Most tracts were continuous, but 3% had discontinuous conversion patterns, indicating that extensive heteroduplex DNA is formed during at least this fraction of events. Mismatches in heteroduplex DNA were repaired in both directions, and repair tracts as short as 44 bp were observed. Surprisingly, most DSB-induced gene conversion tracts were unidirectional and exhibited a reversible polarity that depended on the locations of DSBs and frameshift mutations in recipient and donor alleles.

Full text

PDF
3863

Images in this article

3866Image
on p.3866

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguilera A., Klein H. L. Yeast intrachromosomal recombination: long gene conversion tracts are preferentially associated with reciprocal exchange and require the RAD1 and RAD3 gene products. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):683–694. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahn B. Y., Dornfeld K. J., Fagrelius T. J., Livingston D. M. Effect of limited homology on gene conversion in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasmid recombination system. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Jun;8(6):2442–2448. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.6.2442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahn B. Y., Livingston D. M. Mitotic gene conversion lengths, coconversion patterns, and the incidence of reciprocal recombination in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasmid system. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;6(11):3685–3693. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.11.3685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Astell C. R., Ahlstrom-Jonasson L., Smith M., Tatchell K., Nasmyth K. A., Hall B. D. The sequence of the DNAs coding for the mating-type loci of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell. 1981 Nov;27(1 Pt 2):15–23. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90356-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bishop D. K., Andersen J., Kolodner R. D. Specificity of mismatch repair following transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with heteroduplex plasmid DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 May;86(10):3713–3717. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boeke J. D., LaCroute F., Fink G. R. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(2):345–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00330984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Borts R. H., Haber J. E. Length and distribution of meiotic gene conversion tracts and crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 Sep;123(1):69–80. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Borts R. H., Haber J. E. Meiotic recombination in yeast: alteration by multiple heterozygosities. Science. 1987 Sep 18;237(4821):1459–1465. doi: 10.1126/science.2820060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Borts R. H., Leung W. Y., Kramer W., Kramer B., Williamson M., Fogel S., Haber J. E. Mismatch repair-induced meiotic recombination requires the pms1 gene product. Genetics. 1990 Mar;124(3):573–584. doi: 10.1093/genetics/124.3.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bruschi C. V., Esposito M. S. Enhancement of spontaneous mitotic recombination by the meiotic mutant spo11-1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Dec;80(24):7566–7570. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.24.7566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Connolly B., White C. I., Haber J. E. Physical monitoring of mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Jun;8(6):2342–2349. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.6.2342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Deng W. P., Nickoloff J. A. Site-directed mutagenesis of virtually any plasmid by eliminating a unique site. Anal Biochem. 1992 Jan;200(1):81–88. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90280-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Detloff P., Petes T. D. Measurements of excision repair tracts formed during meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Apr;12(4):1805–1814. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.4.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Detloff P., White M. A., Petes T. D. Analysis of a gene conversion gradient at the HIS4 locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1992 Sep;132(1):113–123. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Eibel H., Philippsen P. Identification of the cloned S. cerevisiae LYS2 gene by an integrative transformation approach. Mol Gen Genet. 1983;191(1):66–73. doi: 10.1007/BF00330891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem. 1983 Jul 1;132(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(83)90418-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fishman-Lobell J., Rudin N., Haber J. E. Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;12(3):1292–1303. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.3.1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fujimura H., Sakuma Y. Simplified isolation of chromosomal and plasmid DNA from yeasts. Biotechniques. 1993 Apr;14(4):538–540. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Haber J. E., Ray B. L., Kolb J. M., White C. I. Rapid kinetics of mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA that is formed during recombination in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Apr 15;90(8):3363–3367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.8.3363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Holmes D. S., Quigley M. A rapid boiling method for the preparation of bacterial plasmids. Anal Biochem. 1981 Jun;114(1):193–197. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90473-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnston M., Davis R. W. Sequences that regulate the divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Aug;4(8):1440–1448. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.8.1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Judd S. R., Petes T. D. Physical lengths of meiotic and mitotic gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1988 Mar;118(3):401–410. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.3.401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kolodkin A. L., Klar A. J., Stahl F. W. Double-strand breaks can initiate meiotic recombination in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1986 Aug 29;46(5):733–740. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90349-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kramer B., Kramer W., Williamson M. S., Fogel S. Heteroduplex DNA correction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is mismatch specific and requires functional PMS genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Oct;9(10):4432–4440. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.10.4432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lewis M. K., Thompson D. V. Efficient site directed in vitro mutagenesis using ampicillin selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Jun 25;18(12):3439–3443. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.12.3439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lin F. L., Sperle K., Sternberg N. Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;4(6):1020–1034. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.6.1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mascioli D. W., Haber J. E. A CIS-Acting Mutation within the MATa Locus of SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE That Prevents Efficient Homothallic Mating-Type Switching. Genetics. 1980 Feb;94(2):341–360. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.2.341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. McGill C., Shafer B., Strathern J. Coconversion of flanking sequences with homothallic switching. Cell. 1989 May 5;57(3):459–467. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90921-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Meselson M. S., Radding C. M. A general model for genetic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):358–361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.1.358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Muster-Nassal C., Kolodner R. Mismatch correction catalyzed by cell-free extracts of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(20):7618–7622. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.20.7618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nag D. K., White M. A., Petes T. D. Palindromic sequences in heteroduplex DNA inhibit mismatch repair in yeast. Nature. 1989 Jul 27;340(6231):318–320. doi: 10.1038/340318a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nickoloff J. A., Chen E. Y., Heffron F. A 24-base-pair DNA sequence from the MAT locus stimulates intergenic recombination in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Oct;83(20):7831–7835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.20.7831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nickoloff J. A., Reynolds R. J. Subcloning with new ampicillin- and kanamycin-resistant analogs of pUC19. Biotechniques. 1991 Apr;10(4):469-70, 472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nickoloff J. A., Singer J. D., Heffron F. In vivo analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO nuclease recognition site by site-directed mutagenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Mar;10(3):1174–1179. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.3.1174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nickoloff J. A., Singer J. D., Hoekstra M. F., Heffron F. Double-strand breaks stimulate alternative mechanisms of recombination repair. J Mol Biol. 1989 Jun 5;207(3):527–541. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90462-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nicolas A., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. An initiation site for meiotic gene conversion in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):35–39. doi: 10.1038/338035a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W. Fungal recombination. Microbiol Rev. 1985 Mar;49(1):33–58. doi: 10.1128/mr.49.1.33-58.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Orr-Weaver T. L., Szostak J. W., Rothstein R. J. Yeast transformation: a model system for the study of recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Oct;78(10):6354–6358. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.10.6354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Porter S. E., White M. A., Petes T. D. Genetic evidence that the meiotic recombination hotspot at the HIS4 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae does not represent a site for a symmetrically processed double-strand break. Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):5–19. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ray A., Siddiqi I., Kolodkin A. L., Stahl F. W. Intra-chromosomal gene conversion induced by a DNA double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol. 1988 May 20;201(2):247–260. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90136-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ray B. L., White C. I., Haber J. E. Heteroduplex formation and mismatch repair of the "stuck" mutation during mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;11(10):5372–5380. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.10.5372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Roitgrund C., Steinlauf R., Kupiec M. Donation of information to the unbroken chromosome in double-strand break repair. Curr Genet. 1993 May-Jun;23(5-6):414–422. doi: 10.1007/BF00312628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Roman H., Fabre F. Gene conversion and associated reciprocal recombination are separable events in vegetative cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Nov;80(22):6912–6916. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.22.6912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ronne H., Rothstein R. Mitotic sectored colonies: evidence of heteroduplex DNA formation during direct repeat recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Apr;85(8):2696–2700. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rose M., Grisafi P., Botstein D. Structure and function of the yeast URA3 gene: expression in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1984 Jul-Aug;29(1-2):113–124. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90172-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rothstein R. J. One-step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:202–211. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rudin N., Haber J. E. Efficient repair of HO-induced chromosomal breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by recombination between flanking homologous sequences. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;8(9):3918–3928. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.9.3918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rudin N., Sugarman E., Haber J. E. Genetic and physical analysis of double-strand break repair and recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):519–534. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Scherer S., Davis R. W. Replacement of chromosome segments with altered DNA sequences constructed in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):4951–4955. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.4951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Strathern J. N., Klar A. J., Hicks J. B., Abraham J. A., Ivy J. M., Nasmyth K. A., McGill C. Homothallic switching of yeast mating type cassettes is initiated by a double-stranded cut in the MAT locus. Cell. 1982 Nov;31(1):183–192. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90418-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sugawara N., Haber J. E. Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;12(2):563–575. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.2.563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sun H., Treco D., Schultes N. P., Szostak J. W. Double-strand breaks at an initiation site for meiotic gene conversion. Nature. 1989 Mar 2;338(6210):87–90. doi: 10.1038/338087a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Sun H., Treco D., Szostak J. W. Extensive 3'-overhanging, single-stranded DNA associated with the meiosis-specific double-strand breaks at the ARG4 recombination initiation site. Cell. 1991 Mar 22;64(6):1155–1161. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90270-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Symington L. S., Petes T. D. Expansions and contractions of the genetic map relative to the physical map of yeast chromosome III. Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Feb;8(2):595–604. doi: 10.1128/mcb.8.2.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Thaler D. S., Stahl F. W. DNA double-chain breaks in recombination of phage lambda and of yeast. Annu Rev Genet. 1988;22:169–197. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.001125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Weiffenbach B., Rogers D. T., Haber J. E., Zoller M., Russell D. W., Smith M. Deletions and single base pair changes in the yeast mating type locus that prevent homothallic mating type conversions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jun;80(11):3401–3405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.11.3401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. White C. I., Haber J. E. Intermediates of recombination during mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1990 Mar;9(3):663–673. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08158.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Willis K. K., Klein H. L. Intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: reciprocal exchange in an inverted repeat and associated gene conversion. Genetics. 1987 Dec;117(4):633–643. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.4.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Molecular and Cellular Biology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES