Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2013 Feb 13;69(Pt 3):o376. doi: 10.1107/S1600536813003206

6,7-Difluoro-1,2,3,4-tetra­hydro­quin­oxa­line-5,8-dicarbonitrile

Bao-Hua Qu a, Xiao-Chuan Jia b, Jing Li b, Ming-Yang He a,*
PMCID: PMC3588508  PMID: 23476563

Abstract

In the title compound, C10H6F2N4, the Car—N bonds are slightly shortened with respect to a standard aniline C—N bond [1.3580 (16) and 1.3618 (16) versus 1.39 Å], thus indicating some π–π conjgation with the electron-acceptor CN groups. The mol­ecule, except for two C atom of the ethyl­ene bridge, is nearly planar, the largest deviation of the other non-H atoms from the mean plane being 0.309 (2) Å. The N—C—C—N torsion angle involving the ethyl­ene bridge is 50.23 (18)°. In the crystal, mol­ecules are connected by pairs of N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds into chains along [21-1].

Related literature  

For general background to the synthesis and use of tetra­fluoro­terephthalonitrile and its derivatives, see: Meazza et al. (2007). For reference structural data on tetra­fluoro­terephthalic acid, see: Orthaber et al. (2010). For standard bond lengths, see: Allen et al. (1987). For hydrogen bonding graph-set descriptors, see: Etter (1990).graphic file with name e-69-0o376-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C10H6F2N4

  • M r = 220.19

  • Triclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 5.2173 (9) Å

  • b = 8.7011 (15) Å

  • c = 11.1453 (19) Å

  • α = 75.545 (2)°

  • β = 81.854 (2)°

  • γ = 76.427 (2)°

  • V = 474.40 (14) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.13 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.28 × 0.24 × 0.16 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) T min = 0.964, T max = 0.980

  • 4155 measured reflections

  • 2141 independent reflections

  • 1816 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.026

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.043

  • wR(F 2) = 0.140

  • S = 1.06

  • 2141 reflections

  • 145 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813003206/yk2078sup1.cif

e-69-0o376-sup1.cif (18.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813003206/yk2078Isup2.hkl

e-69-0o376-Isup2.hkl (105.3KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813003206/yk2078Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N3—H3⋯N1i 0.86 2.29 3.075 (2) 152
N4—H4⋯N2ii 0.86 2.21 3.0358 (19) 160

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

As important organic intermediates, tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile and its hydrolyzed product tetrafluoroterephthalic acid can be used to prepare pesticide tefluthrin (Meazza et al., 2007; Orthaber et al., 2010). The SNAr reaction of tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile with ethylenediamine under ultrasound irradiation yields 6,7-difluoro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoxaline-5,8-dicarbonitrile [C10H6F2N4, compound (I)] as the main product. While the crystal structure of compound (I) was suspiciously unknown. Herein, we report the crystal structure of (I) for comparison and reference purposes.

Compound (I) crystallizes in triclinic P1 space group. A perspective view of the title compound (I) is shown in Fig. 1. The bond lengths and angles are within normal ranges. In the molecule, two nitrile groups are nearly coplanar with the central benzene plane. Within the tetrahydroquinoxaline ring, the torsion angle N3–C10–C9–N4 is -50.23 (18)°. Hydrogen-bonding interactions between the imino groups and cyano groups give rise to cyclic system of two N–H···N bonds between two adjacent molecules with the graph-set motif R22(12) (Etter, 1990). Due to the chemical symmetry of the molecule itself, such hydrogen-bonding interactions link the molecules to form a one-dimensional (1-D) tape structure (Fig. 2).

Experimental

Compound (I) was synthesized by the ultrasound reaction of tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile and ethylenediamine at room temperature in the presence of sulfur and assisted by ultrasound irradiation. The title compound was purified through column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether as the eluent. Qualified crystalline samples were obtained through slow evaporation from the EtOH solution of (I).

Refinement

All H atoms were positioned geometrically (C–H = 0.97 Å, N–H = 0.86 Å) and included in the refinement in the riding-model approximation, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C,N).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound showing the atom labelling scheme. Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

1-D hydrogen-bonding tape of (I) formed by N–H···N interactions. Hydrogen bonds indicated by dashed lines.

Crystal data

C10H6F2N4 Z = 2
Mr = 220.19 F(000) = 224
Triclinic, P1 Dx = 1.541 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.2173 (9) Å Cell parameters from 2503 reflections
b = 8.7011 (15) Å θ = 2.5–27.6°
c = 11.1453 (19) Å µ = 0.13 mm1
α = 75.545 (2)° T = 293 K
β = 81.854 (2)° Block, colorless
γ = 76.427 (2)° 0.28 × 0.24 × 0.16 mm
V = 474.40 (14) Å3

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 2141 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1816 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.026
φ and ω scans θmax = 27.6°, θmin = 1.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2003) h = −6→6
Tmin = 0.964, Tmax = 0.980 k = −11→11
4155 measured reflections l = −14→13

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.043 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.140 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0825P)2 + 0.0701P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2141 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
145 parameters Δρmax = 0.29 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.23 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.5584 (3) 0.24423 (15) 0.57193 (12) 0.0414 (3)
C2 −0.1573 (3) −0.09578 (15) 0.89446 (12) 0.0403 (3)
C3 0.3758 (2) 0.16100 (14) 0.65684 (11) 0.0359 (3)
C4 0.4178 (2) −0.00938 (14) 0.67660 (11) 0.0382 (3)
C5 0.2446 (3) −0.09029 (14) 0.75315 (12) 0.0389 (3)
C6 0.0223 (2) −0.00551 (14) 0.81451 (11) 0.0359 (3)
C7 −0.0247 (2) 0.16328 (14) 0.79859 (11) 0.0348 (3)
C8 0.1573 (2) 0.24965 (14) 0.71567 (11) 0.0355 (3)
C9 −0.2521 (3) 0.41626 (17) 0.85819 (15) 0.0548 (4)
H9A −0.1510 0.4206 0.9235 0.066*
H9B −0.4347 0.4681 0.8760 0.066*
C10 −0.1447 (3) 0.50503 (16) 0.73570 (16) 0.0539 (4)
H10A −0.2651 0.5195 0.6731 0.065*
H10B −0.1288 0.6115 0.7421 0.065*
F1 0.63601 (16) −0.08862 (10) 0.61981 (8) 0.0525 (3)
F2 0.28294 (18) −0.25305 (9) 0.77522 (9) 0.0548 (3)
N1 0.6992 (3) 0.31503 (17) 0.50478 (13) 0.0574 (4)
N2 −0.3029 (3) −0.16595 (16) 0.95803 (12) 0.0560 (3)
N3 0.1134 (2) 0.41386 (13) 0.69902 (12) 0.0481 (3)
H3 0.2066 0.4607 0.6368 0.058*
N4 −0.2375 (2) 0.24862 (13) 0.85611 (11) 0.0463 (3)
H4 −0.3500 0.2005 0.9065 0.056*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0426 (7) 0.0361 (6) 0.0434 (7) −0.0099 (5) 0.0025 (5) −0.0070 (5)
C2 0.0442 (7) 0.0324 (6) 0.0425 (7) −0.0105 (5) −0.0031 (5) −0.0029 (5)
C3 0.0368 (6) 0.0330 (6) 0.0366 (6) −0.0104 (5) 0.0008 (5) −0.0046 (5)
C4 0.0385 (6) 0.0328 (6) 0.0413 (6) −0.0054 (5) 0.0013 (5) −0.0093 (5)
C5 0.0450 (7) 0.0263 (5) 0.0438 (7) −0.0075 (5) −0.0038 (5) −0.0050 (5)
C6 0.0384 (6) 0.0307 (6) 0.0372 (6) −0.0106 (5) −0.0021 (5) −0.0029 (5)
C7 0.0348 (6) 0.0307 (6) 0.0367 (6) −0.0080 (4) −0.0009 (5) −0.0038 (4)
C8 0.0374 (6) 0.0290 (6) 0.0389 (6) −0.0091 (4) −0.0014 (5) −0.0043 (4)
C9 0.0552 (8) 0.0362 (7) 0.0657 (9) −0.0042 (6) 0.0124 (7) −0.0132 (6)
C10 0.0528 (8) 0.0307 (6) 0.0715 (10) −0.0053 (5) 0.0069 (7) −0.0091 (6)
F1 0.0486 (5) 0.0416 (4) 0.0609 (5) −0.0030 (3) 0.0120 (4) −0.0149 (4)
F2 0.0620 (5) 0.0262 (4) 0.0709 (6) −0.0087 (3) 0.0058 (4) −0.0084 (4)
N1 0.0592 (8) 0.0508 (7) 0.0578 (7) −0.0212 (6) 0.0136 (6) −0.0053 (6)
N2 0.0555 (7) 0.0487 (7) 0.0587 (7) −0.0205 (6) 0.0065 (6) 0.0002 (6)
N3 0.0470 (6) 0.0279 (5) 0.0627 (7) −0.0106 (4) 0.0132 (5) −0.0051 (5)
N4 0.0420 (6) 0.0344 (5) 0.0564 (7) −0.0093 (4) 0.0126 (5) −0.0075 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—N1 1.1425 (17) C7—C8 1.4354 (16)
C1—C3 1.4330 (17) C8—N3 1.3618 (16)
C2—N2 1.1408 (17) C9—N4 1.4485 (18)
C2—C6 1.4310 (17) C9—C10 1.495 (2)
C3—C8 1.3973 (17) C9—H9A 0.9700
C3—C4 1.4116 (17) C9—H9B 0.9700
C4—F1 1.3481 (14) C10—N3 1.4537 (18)
C4—C5 1.3492 (18) C10—H10A 0.9700
C5—F2 1.3465 (14) C10—H10B 0.9700
C5—C6 1.4081 (18) N3—H3 0.8600
C6—C7 1.4007 (16) N4—H4 0.8599
C7—N4 1.3580 (16)
N1—C1—C3 177.89 (14) C3—C8—C7 118.45 (11)
N2—C2—C6 179.11 (14) N4—C9—C10 110.40 (12)
C8—C3—C4 121.41 (11) N4—C9—H9A 109.6
C8—C3—C1 119.68 (11) C10—C9—H9A 109.6
C4—C3—C1 118.89 (11) N4—C9—H9B 109.6
F1—C4—C5 121.20 (11) C10—C9—H9B 109.6
F1—C4—C3 118.67 (11) H9A—C9—H9B 108.1
C5—C4—C3 120.12 (11) N3—C10—C9 109.85 (12)
F2—C5—C4 121.21 (11) N3—C10—H10A 109.7
F2—C5—C6 118.54 (11) C9—C10—H10A 109.7
C4—C5—C6 120.23 (11) N3—C10—H10B 109.7
C7—C6—C5 121.40 (11) C9—C10—H10B 109.7
C7—C6—C2 120.11 (11) H10A—C10—H10B 108.2
C5—C6—C2 118.48 (11) C8—N3—C10 120.46 (11)
N4—C7—C6 122.84 (11) C8—N3—H3 114.4
N4—C7—C8 118.78 (11) C10—N3—H3 118.1
C6—C7—C8 118.36 (11) C7—N4—C9 121.10 (11)
N3—C8—C3 122.59 (11) C7—N4—H4 121.1
N3—C8—C7 118.94 (11) C9—N4—H4 116.3
C8—C3—C4—F1 −178.24 (11) C4—C3—C8—N3 179.46 (12)
C1—C3—C4—F1 3.43 (18) C1—C3—C8—N3 −2.24 (19)
C1—C3—C4—C5 −177.99 (11) C4—C3—C8—C7 0.62 (19)
F1—C4—C5—F2 −0.2 (2) C1—C3—C8—C7 178.93 (10)
C3—C4—C5—F2 −178.78 (11) N4—C7—C8—N3 1.12 (19)
F1—C4—C5—C6 178.02 (11) C6—C7—C8—N3 179.76 (11)
C3—C4—C5—C6 −0.5 (2) N4—C7—C8—C3 180.00 (11)
F2—C5—C6—C7 178.04 (11) C6—C7—C8—C3 −1.37 (18)
C4—C5—C6—C7 −0.3 (2) N4—C9—C10—N3 −50.23 (18)
F2—C5—C6—C2 −1.96 (18) C3—C8—N3—C10 164.48 (13)
C4—C5—C6—C2 179.72 (11) C7—C8—N3—C10 −16.7 (2)
C5—C6—C7—N4 179.80 (11) C9—C10—N3—C8 41.7 (2)
C2—C6—C7—N4 −0.20 (19) C6—C7—N4—C9 167.19 (13)
C5—C6—C7—C8 1.22 (19) C8—C7—N4—C9 −14.2 (2)
C2—C6—C7—C8 −178.78 (10) C10—C9—N4—C7 39.5 (2)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N3—H3···N1i 0.86 2.29 3.075 (2) 152
N4—H4···N2ii 0.86 2.21 3.0358 (19) 160

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x−1, −y, −z+2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: YK2078).

References

  1. Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19.
  2. Brandenburg, K. (2005). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  3. Bruker (2007). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Etter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120–126.
  5. Meazza, G., Bettarini, F. & Fornara, L. (2007). WO Patent No. 2007101587.
  6. Orthaber, A., Seidel, C., Belaj, F., Albering, J. H., Pietschnig, R. & Ruschewitz, U. (2010). Inorg. Chem. 49, 9350–9357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  8. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813003206/yk2078sup1.cif

e-69-0o376-sup1.cif (18.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813003206/yk2078Isup2.hkl

e-69-0o376-Isup2.hkl (105.3KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813003206/yk2078Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES