Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Nov 3;68(Pt 12):o3264–o3265. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812044716

Ethyl 2-(3-methyl-5-sulfanyl­idene-4,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl)acetate

Zbigniew Karczmarzyk a,*, Monika Pitucha b, Waldemar Wysocki a, Andrzej Fruziński c, Ewa Olender a
PMCID: PMC3588816  PMID: 23468781

Abstract

The title compound, C7H11N3O2S, exists in the 5-thioxo tautomeric form. The 1,2,4-triazoline ring is essentially planar, with a maximum deviation of 0.010 (2) Å for the substituted N atom. The ethyl acetate substituent is almost planar, with a maximum deviation of 0.061 (4) Å for the methyl­ene C atom of the eth­oxy group. The angle between the mean plane of this substituent and the mean plane of the 1,2,4-triazoline ring is 89.74 (8)°. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked by a combination of N—H⋯S, C—H⋯N and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds into chains parallel to [100].

Related literature  

For background information on the title compound, see: Saadeh et al. (2010); Akhtar et al. (2008); Al-Omar et al. (2010). For the biological activity of 1,2,4-triazoline-thio­nes, see: Pitucha et al. (2010). For their synthesis, see: Bany & Dobosz (1972). For related structures, see: Kruszynski et al. (2007); Siwek et al. (2008). For graph-set motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995).graphic file with name e-68-o3264-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C7H11N3O2S

  • M r = 201.25

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 6.4438 (19) Å

  • b = 15.2328 (15) Å

  • c = 9.9672 (8) Å

  • β = 98.416 (19)°

  • V = 967.8 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.31 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.60 × 0.30 × 0.30 mm

Data collection  

  • Kuma KM-4 four-circle diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) T min = 0.754, T max = 0.869

  • 2979 measured reflections

  • 2837 independent reflections

  • 1571 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.069

  • 2 standard reflections every 100 reflections intensity decay: 8.9%

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.062

  • wR(F 2) = 0.198

  • S = 0.93

  • 2837 reflections

  • 123 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.64 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.48 e Å−3

Data collection: KM4B8 (Gałdecki et al., 1996); cell refinement: KM4B8; data reduction: DATAPROC (Gałdecki et al., 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and WinGX (Farrugia, 2012).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044716/fj2601sup1.cif

e-68-o3264-sup1.cif (18.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044716/fj2601Isup2.hkl

e-68-o3264-Isup2.hkl (136.4KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044716/fj2601Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1⋯S6i 0.79 (4) 2.56 (4) 3.339 (3) 170 (4)
C8—H8B⋯N2ii 0.97 2.50 3.407 (3) 155
C13—H13A⋯O10ii 0.96 2.57 3.482 (5) 159

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The 1,2,4-triazoline-thiones were found to have significant antimicrobial action (Saadeh et al., 2010; Akhtar et al., 2008; Al-Omar et al., 2010). The title compound, (I), belongs to 3- and 4-substituted derivatives of 1,2,4-triazoline-thiones with potential antituberculosis activity against mycobacterium strains of Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium phlei and Mycobacterium H37Ra (Pitucha et al., 2010).

The X-ray analysis of the title compound undertook in order to its structural characterization and to identification of the proper thiol-thione tautomeric form revealed that this compound exists as 5-thioxo tautomer in the crystalline state. The molecular geometry of (I) is very similar to that observed in related structures of 2-(3-methyl-5-thioxo-4,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl)acetic acid (Kruszynski et al., 2007) and 4-[3-(2-methyl-furan-3-yl)-5-thioxo-1,2,4-triazol-4-yl]acetic acid (Siwek et al., 2008). The 1,2,4-triazoline ring is planar to within 0.010 (2) Å. The ethyl acetate chain is almost planar with the most deviating C12 atom from the best C8/C9/O10/O11/C12/C13 plane by 0.061 (4) Å and it adopts a gauche conformation in respect to 1,2,4-triazoline ring with the torsion angle C3—N4—C8—C9 of 92.7 (3)°. This conformation is stabilized by the C8—H8B···S6 intramolecular hydrogen bond specified as S(5) in graph set notation (Bernstein et al., 1995).

In the crystal structure, (Fig. 2), the molecules of (I) are linked by a combination of N1—H1···S6, C8—H8B···N2 and C13—H13A···O10 intermolecular hydrogen bond into chains of R22(8), R22(13) and R44(16) edge-fused rings parallel to the [100] direction.

Experimental

The title compound, (I), was prepared from acetamidrazone hydrochloride and carboethoxymethyl isothiocyanate, according to the method of Bany & Dobosz (1972).

Refinement

The N-bound H atom was located by difference Fourier synthesis and refined freely. The remaining H atoms were positioned geometrically and treated as riding on their C atoms with C—H distances of 0.93 Å (aromatic), 0.96 Å (CH2) and 0.97 Å (CH3). All H atoms were assigned Uiso(H) values of 1.5Ueq(N,C)]..

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of (I), with atom labels and 30% probability displacement ellipsoids for non-H atoms.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A view of the molecular packing in (I).

Crystal data

C7H11N3O2S F(000) = 424
Mr = 201.25 Dx = 1.381 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Melting point = 446–447 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.4438 (19) Å Cell parameters from 70 reflections
b = 15.2328 (15) Å θ = 2.7–11.9°
c = 9.9672 (8) Å µ = 0.31 mm1
β = 98.416 (19)° T = 293 K
V = 967.8 (3) Å3 Prism, colourless
Z = 4 0.60 × 0.30 × 0.30 mm

Data collection

Kuma KM-4 four-circle diffractometer 1571 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube Rint = 0.069
Graphite monochromator θmax = 30.1°, θmin = 2.5°
ω–2θ scans h = −9→8
Absorption correction: ψ scan (North et al., 1968) k = 0→21
Tmin = 0.754, Tmax = 0.869 l = 0→14
2979 measured reflections 2 standard reflections every 100 reflections
2837 independent reflections intensity decay: 8.9%

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.062 Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.198 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.93 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1344P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2837 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
123 parameters Δρmax = 0.64 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.48 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S6 0.29109 (11) 0.08274 (5) 0.48884 (8) 0.0493 (3)
O10 0.2086 (3) 0.33096 (15) 0.4137 (2) 0.0553 (6)
O11 0.5003 (3) 0.34124 (13) 0.31670 (19) 0.0423 (5)
N1 −0.1100 (3) 0.08964 (16) 0.3569 (2) 0.0384 (5)
H1 −0.152 (6) 0.053 (3) 0.402 (4) 0.058*
N2 −0.2330 (3) 0.13342 (15) 0.2554 (2) 0.0400 (5)
N4 0.0940 (3) 0.17783 (14) 0.2764 (2) 0.0324 (4)
C3 −0.1054 (4) 0.18780 (18) 0.2086 (2) 0.0348 (5)
C5 0.0896 (4) 0.11528 (17) 0.3742 (2) 0.0338 (5)
C7 −0.1642 (4) 0.2523 (2) 0.0993 (3) 0.0449 (6)
H7A −0.1073 0.2345 0.0198 0.067*
H7B −0.1093 0.3089 0.1282 0.067*
H7C −0.3143 0.2555 0.0788 0.067*
C8 0.2820 (4) 0.22340 (18) 0.2511 (2) 0.0348 (5)
H8A 0.2677 0.2399 0.1562 0.052*
H8B 0.4014 0.1842 0.2700 0.052*
C9 0.3210 (4) 0.30402 (17) 0.3374 (2) 0.0347 (5)
C12 0.5476 (5) 0.4245 (2) 0.3862 (4) 0.0553 (8)
H12A 0.5543 0.4166 0.4833 0.083*
H12B 0.4386 0.4670 0.3561 0.083*
C13 0.7523 (7) 0.4562 (3) 0.3544 (5) 0.0743 (11)
H13A 0.8607 0.4158 0.3902 0.111*
H13B 0.7818 0.5130 0.3944 0.111*
H13C 0.7469 0.4604 0.2578 0.111*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S6 0.0354 (4) 0.0521 (4) 0.0567 (5) −0.0037 (3) −0.0051 (3) 0.0156 (3)
O10 0.0513 (12) 0.0536 (13) 0.0663 (13) −0.0048 (10) 0.0263 (10) −0.0162 (10)
O11 0.0342 (9) 0.0406 (10) 0.0530 (11) −0.0086 (8) 0.0094 (7) −0.0052 (8)
N1 0.0306 (10) 0.0387 (12) 0.0460 (12) −0.0034 (9) 0.0064 (8) 0.0086 (10)
N2 0.0278 (10) 0.0463 (12) 0.0457 (12) −0.0014 (9) 0.0046 (8) 0.0046 (10)
N4 0.0247 (9) 0.0336 (10) 0.0392 (10) −0.0001 (8) 0.0061 (7) 0.0002 (8)
C3 0.0280 (11) 0.0398 (13) 0.0367 (12) 0.0024 (10) 0.0052 (9) 0.0003 (10)
C5 0.0300 (11) 0.0302 (11) 0.0411 (13) −0.0001 (9) 0.0051 (9) 0.0001 (10)
C7 0.0352 (14) 0.0523 (16) 0.0467 (15) 0.0049 (12) 0.0045 (11) 0.0091 (12)
C8 0.0268 (11) 0.0411 (13) 0.0384 (12) −0.0036 (10) 0.0115 (9) −0.0008 (10)
C9 0.0329 (12) 0.0355 (12) 0.0360 (12) 0.0001 (10) 0.0062 (9) 0.0038 (10)
C12 0.0517 (17) 0.0402 (15) 0.072 (2) −0.0077 (13) 0.0029 (15) −0.0088 (15)
C13 0.063 (2) 0.057 (2) 0.105 (3) −0.0248 (18) 0.019 (2) −0.007 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

S6—C5 1.674 (3) C7—H7A 0.9600
O10—C9 1.197 (3) C7—H7B 0.9600
O11—C9 1.330 (3) C7—H7C 0.9600
O11—C12 1.455 (4) C8—C9 1.499 (4)
N1—C5 1.331 (3) C8—H8A 0.9700
N1—N2 1.364 (3) C8—H8B 0.9700
N1—H1 0.79 (4) C12—C13 1.482 (5)
N2—C3 1.301 (3) C12—H12A 0.9700
N4—C5 1.367 (3) C12—H12B 0.9700
N4—C3 1.369 (3) C13—H13A 0.9600
N4—C8 1.450 (3) C13—H13B 0.9600
C3—C7 1.475 (4) C13—H13C 0.9600
C9—O11—C12 115.0 (2) N4—C8—H8A 109.3
C5—N1—N2 113.5 (2) C9—C8—H8A 109.3
C5—N1—H1 123 (3) N4—C8—H8B 109.3
N2—N1—H1 124 (3) C9—C8—H8B 109.3
C3—N2—N1 104.3 (2) H8A—C8—H8B 108.0
C5—N4—C3 108.3 (2) O10—C9—O11 124.9 (3)
C5—N4—C8 124.3 (2) O10—C9—C8 125.4 (2)
C3—N4—C8 127.5 (2) O11—C9—C8 109.7 (2)
N2—C3—N4 110.5 (2) O11—C12—C13 108.2 (3)
N2—C3—C7 125.5 (2) O11—C12—H12A 110.1
N4—C3—C7 124.0 (2) C13—C12—H12A 110.1
N1—C5—N4 103.4 (2) O11—C12—H12B 110.1
N1—C5—S6 129.8 (2) C13—C12—H12B 110.1
N4—C5—S6 126.74 (19) H12A—C12—H12B 108.4
C3—C7—H7A 109.5 C12—C13—H13A 109.5
C3—C7—H7B 109.5 C12—C13—H13B 109.5
H7A—C7—H7B 109.5 H13A—C13—H13B 109.5
C3—C7—H7C 109.5 C12—C13—H13C 109.5
H7A—C7—H7C 109.5 H13A—C13—H13C 109.5
H7B—C7—H7C 109.5 H13B—C13—H13C 109.5
N4—C8—C9 111.52 (19)
C5—N1—N2—C3 0.0 (3) C8—N4—C5—N1 −177.5 (2)
N1—N2—C3—N4 1.2 (3) C3—N4—C5—S6 −176.9 (2)
N1—N2—C3—C7 −178.1 (3) C8—N4—C5—S6 3.8 (4)
C5—N4—C3—N2 −1.9 (3) C5—N4—C8—C9 −88.1 (3)
C8—N4—C3—N2 177.3 (2) C3—N4—C8—C9 92.7 (3)
C5—N4—C3—C7 177.4 (2) C12—O11—C9—O10 −5.1 (4)
C8—N4—C3—C7 −3.3 (4) C12—O11—C9—C8 175.1 (2)
N2—N1—C5—N4 −1.1 (3) N4—C8—C9—O10 −3.2 (4)
N2—N1—C5—S6 177.5 (2) N4—C8—C9—O11 176.7 (2)
C3—N4—C5—N1 1.8 (3) C9—O11—C12—C13 179.2 (3)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1···S6i 0.79 (4) 2.56 (4) 3.339 (3) 170 (4)
C8—H8B···N2ii 0.97 2.50 3.407 (3) 155
C13—H13A···O10ii 0.96 2.57 3.482 (5) 159

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y, −z+1; (ii) x+1, y, z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: FJ2601).

References

  1. Akhtar, T., Hameed, S., Khan, K. M. & Choudhary, M. I. (2008). Med. Chem. 4, 539–543. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Al-Omar, M. A., Al-Abdullah, E. S., Shehata, I. A., Habib, E. E., Ibrahim, T. M. & El-Emam, A. A. (2010). Molecules, 15, 2526–2550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Bany, T. & Dobosz, M. (1972). Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Sect AA, 26/27, 23–32.
  4. Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.
  5. Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.
  6. Gałdecki, Z., Kowalski, A., Kucharczyk, D. & Uszyński, L. (1996). KM4B8 Kuma Diffraction, Wrocław, Poland.
  7. Gałdecki, Z., Kowalski, A. & Uszyński, L. (1995). DATAPROC Kuma Diffraction, Wrocław, Poland.
  8. Kruszynski, R., Trzesowska, A., Przybycin, M., Gil, K. & Dobosz, M. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o4378.
  9. North, A. C. T., Phillips, D. C. & Mathews, F. S. (1968). Acta Cryst. A24, 351–359.
  10. Pitucha, M., Polak, B., Swatko-Ossor, M., Popiołek, Ł. & Ginalska, G. (2010). Croat. Chem. Acta, 83, 299–306.
  11. Saadeh, H. A., Mosleh, I. M., Al-Bakri, A. G. & Mubarak, M. I. (2010). Monatsh. Chem. 141, 471–478.
  12. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Siwek, A., Wujec, M., Wawrzycka-Gorczyca, I., Dobosz, M. & Paneth, P. (2008). Heteroat. Chem. 19, 337–344.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044716/fj2601sup1.cif

e-68-o3264-sup1.cif (18.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044716/fj2601Isup2.hkl

e-68-o3264-Isup2.hkl (136.4KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812044716/fj2601Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES