Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Nov 10;68(Pt 12):o3310. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812045497

Piperidine-1-carboxamidinium ethyl carbonate

Ioannis Tiritiris a,*
PMCID: PMC3588849  PMID: 23468814

Abstract

In the title salt, C6H14N3 +·C3H5O3 , the C—N bond lengths in the central CN3 unit of the carboxamidinium cation are 1.3262 (18), 1.3359 (18) and 1.3498 (18) Å, indicating partial double-bond character. The central C atom is bonded to the three N atoms in a nearly ideal trigonal–planar geometry and the positive charge is delocalized in the CN3 plane. The piperidine ring is in a chair conformation. The C—O bond lengths in the ethyl carbonate anion are characteristic for a delocalized double bond and a typical single bond. In the crystal, N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between cations and anions generate a two-dimensional network in the direction of the ab plane, whereas adjacent ion pairs form chains running along the b axis.

Related literature  

For the synthesis and crystal structures of guanidinium hydrogencarbonates, see: Tiritiris et al. (2011). For the crystal structure of piperidine-1-carboximidamide, see: Tiritiris (2012), and for the crystal structure of sodium methyl carbonate, see: Kunert et al. (1998).graphic file with name e-68-o3310-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C6H14N3 +·C3H5O3

  • M r = 217.27

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 11.8320 (6) Å

  • b = 7.2407 (4) Å

  • c = 13.3755 (9) Å

  • β = 105.292 (3)°

  • V = 1105.33 (11) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.10 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.25 × 0.20 × 0.05 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker–Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer

  • 4452 measured reflections

  • 2638 independent reflections

  • 1982 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.047

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.042

  • wR(F 2) = 0.106

  • S = 1.02

  • 2638 reflections

  • 153 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.28 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3

Data collection: COLLECT (Hooft, 2004); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812045497/kp2439sup1.cif

e-68-o3310-sup1.cif (16.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812045497/kp2439Isup2.hkl

e-68-o3310-Isup2.hkl (129.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H11⋯O2i 0.88 (2) 1.99 (2) 2.812 (1) 155 (1)
N1—H12⋯O2ii 0.88 (2) 1.88 (2) 2.747 (1) 173 (1)
N2—H21⋯O1ii 0.84 (2) 2.19 (2) 3.033 (1) 175 (1)
N2—H22⋯O1iii 0.87 (2) 2.06 (2) 2.923 (1) 170 (1)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Dr F. Lissner (Institut für Anorganische Chemie, Universität Stuttgart) for measuring the crystal data.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

By reacting guanidines with CO2 in undried aprotic solvents, the corresponding guanidinium hydrogen carbonate salts are formed exclusively (Tiritiris et al., 2011). To investigate the reaction of carboxamidines with CO2, we used both aprotic and protic solvents. Due to the water content in the common aprotic solvents, the hydrogen carbonate salts were formed too. Most of them are sparingly soluble and could therefore not be obtained in crystalline form. By using ethanol as a solvent for the reaction, the crystalline title compound emerged. According to the structure analysis, the C1–N1 bond in the title compound is 1.3262 (18) Å, C1–N2 = 1.3359 (18) Å and C1–N3 = 1.3498 (18) Å, showing partial double-bond character (Fig. 1). The N–C1–N angles are: 117.59 (13)° (N1–C1–N2), 121.04 (12)° (N1–C1–N3) and 121.36 (12)° (N2–C1–N3), which indicate a nearly ideal trigonal-planar surrounding of the carbon centre by the nitrogen atoms. The positive charge is completely delocalized on the CN3 plane. The structural parameters of the piperidine ring in the here presented title compound agree very well with the data obtained from the X-ray analysis of the starting compound piperidine-1-carboximidamide (Tiritiris, 2012). The piperidine ring adopt a chair conformation. In the ethyl carbonate ion the C7–O1 and C7–O2 bond lengths indicate an evenly distributed double bond character (C7–O1, 1.2485 (16) Å; C7–O2, 1.2509 (17) Å) and a typical single bond (C7–O3, 1.3706 (18) Å). The data fit with the C–O bond lengths of the anion in sodium methyl carbonate (Kunert et al., 1998). In the crystal structure, strong N—H···O hydrogen bonds between hydrogen atoms of carboxamidinium ions and oxygen atoms of neighboring ethyl carbonate ions are observed, generating an infinite two-dimensional network [d(H···O) = 1.88 (2)–2.19 (2) Å] (Tab. 1) with base vectors [1 0 - 1] and [0 1 0] (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the hydrogen bonds are arranged in a way, that adjacent ion pairs are forming chains running along the b axis (Fig. 3).

Experimental

The title compound was prepared by bubbling excess CO2 gas into an ethanolic solution of 2.04 g (16 mmol) piperidine-1-carboximidamide (Tiritiris, 2012). The resulting colourless precipitate was recrystallized from a small amount of ethanol and single crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained. Yield: 3.25 g (93.3%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O/DSS): δ = 1.17–1.20 [t, 3 H, –CH3], 1.61–1.70 [m, 6 H, –CH2], 3.40–3.43 [m, 4 H, –CH2], 3.64–3.68 [q, 2 H, –CH2]. Because of the H/D exchange, the hydrogen atoms of the –NH2 groups were not observed. 13C NMR (125 MHz, D2O/DSS): δ = 16.8 (–CH3), 23.1 (–CH2), 24.7 (–CH2), 46.7 (–CH2), 57.4 (–CH2), 155.5 (N3C+), 160.3 (C═O).

Refinement

The N-bound H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and were refined freely [N—H = 0.84 (2)–0.88 (2) Å]. The hydrogen atoms of the methyl group were allowed to rotate with a fixed angle around the C–C bond to best fit the experimental electron density, with U(H) set to 1.5 Ueq(C) and d(C—H) = 0.98 Å. The H atoms of the methylene groups were placed in calculated positions with d(C—H) = 0.99 Å. They were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with U(H) set to 1.2 Ueq(C).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The structure of the title compound with displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

N–H···O hydrogen bonds generating a two-dimensional network, ab-view. The hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashed lines.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

N–H···O hydrogen bond arrangement forming chains running along the b axis. The hydrogen bonds are indicated by dashed lines.

Crystal data

C6H14N3+·C3H5O3 F(000) = 472
Mr = 217.27 Dx = 1.306 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Melting point: 397 K
Hall symbol: -P 2yn Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 11.8320 (6) Å Cell parameters from 2732 reflections
b = 7.2407 (4) Å θ = 0.4–27.9°
c = 13.3755 (9) Å µ = 0.10 mm1
β = 105.292 (3)° T = 100 K
V = 1105.33 (11) Å3 Plate, colourless
Z = 4 0.25 × 0.20 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

Bruker–Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer 1982 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: sealed tube Rint = 0.047
Graphite monochromator θmax = 27.9°, θmin = 2.1°
φ scans, and ω scans h = −15→15
4452 measured reflections k = −9→8
2638 independent reflections l = −17→17

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042 Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.106 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.02 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0412P)2 + 0.424P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2638 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
153 parameters Δρmax = 0.28 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.23 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
N1 −0.01610 (11) 0.84504 (19) 0.10282 (10) 0.0182 (3)
H11 0.0373 (17) 0.810 (3) 0.0712 (16) 0.030 (5)*
H12 −0.0527 (16) 0.949 (3) 0.0829 (15) 0.029 (5)*
N2 −0.11973 (10) 0.83590 (18) 0.22402 (10) 0.0162 (3)
H21 −0.1508 (14) 0.936 (3) 0.1994 (14) 0.019 (4)*
H22 −0.1552 (15) 0.779 (3) 0.2649 (15) 0.023 (5)*
N3 0.01511 (10) 0.60093 (16) 0.22039 (9) 0.0140 (2)
C1 −0.04041 (11) 0.75874 (19) 0.18211 (11) 0.0138 (3)
C2 −0.02711 (12) 0.4939 (2) 0.29709 (11) 0.0163 (3)
H2A −0.0969 0.4214 0.2610 0.020*
H2B −0.0508 0.5798 0.3455 0.020*
C3 0.06700 (13) 0.3636 (2) 0.35824 (11) 0.0192 (3)
H3A 0.1322 0.4369 0.4019 0.023*
H3B 0.0338 0.2866 0.4046 0.023*
C4 0.11384 (13) 0.2397 (2) 0.28736 (12) 0.0191 (3)
H4A 0.0498 0.1632 0.2446 0.023*
H4B 0.1748 0.1564 0.3288 0.023*
C5 0.16564 (13) 0.3613 (2) 0.21824 (12) 0.0219 (3)
H5A 0.2320 0.4326 0.2617 0.026*
H5B 0.1963 0.2825 0.1709 0.026*
C6 0.07529 (12) 0.4939 (2) 0.15493 (11) 0.0188 (3)
H6A 0.1144 0.5805 0.1175 0.023*
H6B 0.0163 0.4232 0.1027 0.023*
O1 0.25289 (8) 0.31135 (14) 0.63820 (8) 0.0173 (2)
O2 0.36182 (9) 0.34098 (15) 0.52507 (8) 0.0210 (2)
O3 0.26553 (8) 0.08408 (14) 0.52492 (8) 0.0175 (2)
C7 0.29380 (11) 0.2563 (2) 0.56646 (11) 0.0144 (3)
C8 0.18221 (12) −0.0237 (2) 0.56032 (11) 0.0169 (3)
H8A 0.1079 0.0451 0.5511 0.020*
H8B 0.2132 −0.0548 0.6346 0.020*
C9 0.16276 (14) −0.1971 (2) 0.49492 (12) 0.0232 (3)
H9A 0.1235 −0.1652 0.4229 0.035*
H9B 0.1137 −0.2832 0.5215 0.035*
H9C 0.2384 −0.2551 0.4980 0.035*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
N1 0.0210 (6) 0.0191 (6) 0.0183 (6) 0.0056 (5) 0.0120 (5) 0.0059 (5)
N2 0.0193 (6) 0.0147 (6) 0.0175 (6) 0.0039 (5) 0.0100 (5) 0.0048 (5)
N3 0.0151 (5) 0.0161 (6) 0.0124 (5) 0.0021 (4) 0.0064 (4) 0.0022 (5)
C1 0.0155 (6) 0.0145 (6) 0.0115 (6) −0.0020 (5) 0.0037 (5) −0.0012 (5)
C2 0.0177 (6) 0.0194 (7) 0.0141 (7) 0.0018 (6) 0.0086 (5) 0.0035 (6)
C3 0.0228 (7) 0.0207 (7) 0.0154 (7) 0.0043 (6) 0.0072 (6) 0.0048 (6)
C4 0.0243 (7) 0.0145 (7) 0.0207 (7) 0.0026 (6) 0.0098 (6) 0.0027 (6)
C5 0.0232 (7) 0.0229 (8) 0.0240 (8) 0.0081 (6) 0.0137 (6) 0.0062 (6)
C6 0.0229 (7) 0.0206 (7) 0.0168 (7) 0.0060 (6) 0.0122 (6) 0.0028 (6)
O1 0.0201 (5) 0.0178 (5) 0.0171 (5) −0.0018 (4) 0.0104 (4) −0.0027 (4)
O2 0.0244 (5) 0.0221 (6) 0.0209 (5) −0.0078 (4) 0.0139 (4) −0.0052 (4)
O3 0.0188 (5) 0.0184 (5) 0.0181 (5) −0.0050 (4) 0.0099 (4) −0.0041 (4)
C7 0.0123 (6) 0.0181 (7) 0.0131 (7) 0.0006 (5) 0.0037 (5) −0.0003 (5)
C8 0.0169 (6) 0.0186 (7) 0.0174 (7) −0.0021 (5) 0.0081 (6) −0.0004 (6)
C9 0.0250 (7) 0.0238 (8) 0.0241 (8) −0.0083 (6) 0.0121 (6) −0.0052 (7)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

N1—C1 1.3262 (18) C4—H4B 0.9900
N1—H11 0.88 (2) C5—C6 1.518 (2)
N1—H12 0.88 (2) C5—H5A 0.9900
N2—C1 1.3359 (18) C5—H5B 0.9900
N2—H21 0.84 (2) C6—H6A 0.9900
N2—H22 0.87 (2) C6—H6B 0.9900
N3—C1 1.3498 (18) O1—C7 1.2485 (16)
N3—C2 1.4742 (17) O2—C7 1.2509 (17)
N3—C6 1.4842 (17) O3—C7 1.3706 (18)
C2—C3 1.5227 (19) O3—C8 1.4323 (16)
C2—H2A 0.9900 C8—C9 1.512 (2)
C2—H2B 0.9900 C8—H8A 0.9900
C3—C4 1.512 (2) C8—H8B 0.9900
C3—H3A 0.9900 C9—H9A 0.9800
C3—H3B 0.9900 C9—H9B 0.9800
C4—C5 1.518 (2) C9—H9C 0.9800
C4—H4A 0.9900
C1—N1—H11 125.4 (13) H4A—C4—H4B 108.4
C1—N1—H12 117.1 (12) C6—C5—C4 111.62 (12)
H11—N1—H12 117.4 (18) C6—C5—H5A 109.3
C1—N2—H21 118.6 (11) C4—C5—H5A 109.3
C1—N2—H22 125.0 (12) C6—C5—H5B 109.3
H21—N2—H22 114.7 (16) C4—C5—H5B 109.3
C1—N3—C2 119.25 (11) H5A—C5—H5B 108.0
C1—N3—C6 118.65 (11) N3—C6—C5 112.21 (11)
C2—N3—C6 116.07 (11) N3—C6—H6A 109.2
N1—C1—N2 117.59 (13) C5—C6—H6A 109.2
N1—C1—N3 121.04 (12) N3—C6—H6B 109.2
N2—C1—N3 121.36 (12) C5—C6—H6B 109.2
N3—C2—C3 111.43 (10) H6A—C6—H6B 107.9
N3—C2—H2A 109.3 C7—O3—C8 118.52 (10)
C3—C2—H2A 109.3 O1—C7—O2 127.52 (13)
N3—C2—H2B 109.3 O1—C7—O3 119.95 (12)
C3—C2—H2B 109.3 O2—C7—O3 112.53 (12)
H2A—C2—H2B 108.0 O3—C8—C9 105.90 (11)
C4—C3—C2 111.57 (12) O3—C8—H8A 110.6
C4—C3—H3A 109.3 C9—C8—H8A 110.6
C2—C3—H3A 109.3 O3—C8—H8B 110.6
C4—C3—H3B 109.3 C9—C8—H8B 110.6
C2—C3—H3B 109.3 H8A—C8—H8B 108.7
H3A—C3—H3B 108.0 C8—C9—H9A 109.5
C3—C4—C5 108.14 (12) C8—C9—H9B 109.5
C3—C4—H4A 110.1 H9A—C9—H9B 109.5
C5—C4—H4A 110.1 C8—C9—H9C 109.5
C3—C4—H4B 110.1 H9A—C9—H9C 109.5
C5—C4—H4B 110.1 H9B—C9—H9C 109.5
C2—N3—C1—N1 −170.39 (13) C3—C4—C5—C6 −58.57 (17)
C6—N3—C1—N1 −18.76 (19) C1—N3—C6—C5 160.64 (12)
C2—N3—C1—N2 11.15 (19) C2—N3—C6—C5 −46.85 (16)
C6—N3—C1—N2 162.78 (13) C4—C5—C6—N3 52.04 (17)
C1—N3—C2—C3 −160.06 (12) C8—O3—C7—O1 4.51 (19)
C6—N3—C2—C3 47.59 (16) C8—O3—C7—O2 −175.98 (12)
N3—C2—C3—C4 −54.20 (16) C7—O3—C8—C9 175.66 (12)
C2—C3—C4—C5 59.74 (16)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H11···O2i 0.88 (2) 1.99 (2) 2.812 (1) 155 (1)
N1—H12···O2ii 0.88 (2) 1.88 (2) 2.747 (1) 173 (1)
N2—H21···O1ii 0.84 (2) 2.19 (2) 3.033 (1) 175 (1)
N2—H22···O1iii 0.87 (2) 2.06 (2) 2.923 (1) 170 (1)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z−1/2; (iii) −x, −y+1, −z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: KP2439).

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2005). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, D-53002 Bonn, Germany.
  2. Hooft, R. W. W. (2004). COLLECT Bruker–Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.
  3. Kunert, M., Wiegeleben, P., Görls, H. & Dinjus, E. (1998). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 1, 131–133.
  4. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Tiritiris, I. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o3253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Tiritiris, I., Mezger, J., Stoyanov, E. V. & Kantlehner, W. (2011). Z. Naturforsch. Teil B, 66, 407–418.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812045497/kp2439sup1.cif

e-68-o3310-sup1.cif (16.4KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812045497/kp2439Isup2.hkl

e-68-o3310-Isup2.hkl (129.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES