Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2012 Nov 17;68(Pt 12):o3372. doi: 10.1107/S1600536812046569

2-Amino-4,6-dimethyl­pyrimidin-1-ium chloride

Hui-Ling Hu a, Chun-Wei Yeh b,a,*
PMCID: PMC3588968  PMID: 23476204

Abstract

In the title compound, C6H10N3 +·Cl, the cation is essentially planar with an r.m.s. deviations of the fitted atoms of 0.008 Å. In the crystal, adjacent ions are linked by weak N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds involving the pyrimidine and amine N atoms, forming a three-dimensional network. C—H⋯π inter­actions between the methyl and pyrimidine groups and π–π stacking [centroid–centroid distance = 3.474 (1) Å] between parallel pyrimidine ring systems are also observed.

Related literature  

For the crystal structures of 2-amino­pyrimidinium salts with other anions, see: Cheng et al. (2010); Eshtiagh-Hosseini et al. (2010); Hu & Yeh (2012).graphic file with name e-68-o3372-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C6H10N3 +·Cl

  • M r = 159.62

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 16.372 (4) Å

  • b = 8.795 (2) Å

  • c = 12.007 (3) Å

  • β = 108.133 (5)°

  • V = 1642.9 (8) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.40 mm−1

  • T = 273 K

  • 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.3 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) T min = 0.869, T max = 0.982

  • 5044 measured reflections

  • 1620 independent reflections

  • 1008 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.046

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.039

  • wR(F 2) = 0.105

  • S = 0.90

  • 1620 reflections

  • 93 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.18 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2010); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2010); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2010); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812046569/gw2128sup1.cif

e-68-o3372-sup1.cif (15.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812046569/gw2128Isup2.hkl

e-68-o3372-Isup2.hkl (79.9KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812046569/gw2128Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

Cg1 is the centroid of the C1–C4/N2/N3 ring.

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Cli 0.86 2.42 3.260 (2) 167
N1—H1B⋯Clii 0.86 2.57 3.262 (2) 138
N2—H2N⋯Cl 0.86 2.22 3.042 (2) 161
C5—H5ACg1iii 0.96 3.00 3.446 (3) 110

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the National Science Council of the Republic of China and the Taoyuan Innovation Institute of Technology for support.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

There are several supramolecular structures containing 2-aminopyrimidinium cations with other anions constructed by hydrogen bonds (Cheng, et al. 2010; Eshtiagh-Hosseini, et al. 2010; Hu, et al. 2012). The asymmetric unit of the title molecule, C6H10N3+, Cl-, consists a mono-protonated 2-amino-4,6-dimethylpyrimidine and one chloride anion (Fig. 1). The protonated pyrimidine groups are flat and these carbon/nitrogen atoms of mean devition from plane are 0.008 Å. The cations and anions are interlinked through N—H···Cl hydrogen bonds which are found between the H atoms bound to the pyrimidine and amine N atoms and the chloride anions showing the three-dimensional net (Fig. 2, Tab. 1). In the crystal, the weak C—H···pi interactions between the methyl and pyrimidinyl groups and the pi···pi stacking between parallel pyrimidine ring systems are observed, respectively [3.474 (1) Å], while Cg1 is the centers of C1—C4/N2—N3.

Experimental

An aqueous solution (5.0 ml) of zinc chloride (1.0 mmol) was layered carefully over a methanolic solution (5.0 ml) of 2-amino-4,6-dimethylpyrimidine (2.0 mmol) in a tube. Yellow crystals were obtained after several weeks. These were washed with methanol and collected in 83.5% yield.

Refinement

H atoms bound to C atoms were placed in idealized positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with C—H = 0.93 - 0.96 Å and N—H = 0.86 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2 or 1.5 Ueq(C/N).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

An ORTEP view of the title compound with the atom-labelling scheme.Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at 30% probability level, and H atoms are represented by small spheres of arbitrary radii.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The packing diagram shows the N—H···Cl and C—H···pi hydrogen bonds and pi—pi stacking interactions forming the three-dimensional net.

Crystal data

C6H10N3+·Cl F(000) = 672
Mr = 159.62 Dx = 1.291 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 1118 reflections
a = 16.372 (4) Å θ = 2.7–22.9°
b = 8.795 (2) Å µ = 0.40 mm1
c = 12.007 (3) Å T = 273 K
β = 108.133 (5)° Block, yellow
V = 1642.9 (8) Å3 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.3 mm
Z = 8

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer 1620 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1008 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.046
phi and ω scans θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) h = −19→20
Tmin = 0.869, Tmax = 0.982 k = −10→10
5044 measured reflections l = −14→11

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.105 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.90 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0545P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1620 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
93 parameters Δρmax = 0.18 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.17 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cl 0.06044 (4) 0.20186 (8) 0.63062 (5) 0.0635 (3)
C1 0.19281 (13) 0.0360 (3) 0.9384 (2) 0.0456 (6)
C2 0.28190 (14) 0.1835 (2) 0.8578 (2) 0.0476 (6)
C3 0.35098 (14) 0.1274 (3) 0.9429 (2) 0.0524 (6)
H3A 0.4063 0.1584 0.9477 0.063*
C4 0.33775 (13) 0.0227 (3) 1.0228 (2) 0.0490 (6)
C5 0.28542 (16) 0.2952 (3) 0.7666 (2) 0.0639 (7)
H5A 0.2522 0.3834 0.7718 0.096*
H5B 0.2623 0.2499 0.6905 0.096*
H5C 0.3440 0.3244 0.7785 0.096*
C6 0.41211 (15) −0.0414 (3) 1.1175 (2) 0.0682 (8)
H6A 0.3997 −0.0390 1.1906 0.102*
H6B 0.4625 0.0183 1.1242 0.102*
H6C 0.4219 −0.1445 1.0987 0.102*
N1 0.11391 (11) −0.0037 (2) 0.93458 (18) 0.0598 (6)
H1A 0.1063 −0.0665 0.9853 0.072*
H1B 0.0703 0.0334 0.8814 0.072*
N2 0.20317 (11) 0.1349 (2) 0.85719 (15) 0.0470 (5)
H2N 0.1585 0.1678 0.8037 0.056*
N3 0.25965 (11) −0.0223 (2) 1.02128 (16) 0.0480 (5)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cl 0.0469 (4) 0.0883 (5) 0.0535 (4) 0.0071 (3) 0.0131 (3) 0.0016 (3)
C1 0.0433 (12) 0.0489 (13) 0.0451 (14) −0.0002 (11) 0.0144 (11) −0.0052 (11)
C2 0.0516 (13) 0.0483 (13) 0.0459 (13) −0.0037 (11) 0.0193 (11) −0.0071 (11)
C3 0.0415 (12) 0.0603 (15) 0.0579 (16) −0.0074 (11) 0.0190 (11) −0.0044 (13)
C4 0.0447 (13) 0.0536 (14) 0.0469 (14) 0.0019 (11) 0.0117 (11) −0.0066 (11)
C5 0.0717 (16) 0.0674 (16) 0.0581 (16) −0.0057 (14) 0.0280 (13) 0.0069 (14)
C6 0.0487 (13) 0.0823 (19) 0.0663 (19) 0.0064 (14) 0.0073 (13) 0.0103 (15)
N1 0.0407 (11) 0.0734 (15) 0.0629 (15) −0.0037 (10) 0.0129 (10) 0.0083 (10)
N2 0.0434 (10) 0.0530 (11) 0.0428 (11) 0.0034 (9) 0.0107 (8) 0.0017 (9)
N3 0.0425 (10) 0.0528 (12) 0.0467 (12) 0.0015 (9) 0.0110 (9) 0.0027 (9)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

C1—N1 1.325 (3) C5—H5A 0.9600
C1—N3 1.331 (3) C5—H5B 0.9600
C1—N2 1.356 (3) C5—H5C 0.9600
C2—N2 1.356 (3) C6—H6A 0.9600
C2—C3 1.359 (3) C6—H6B 0.9600
C2—C5 1.486 (3) C6—H6C 0.9600
C3—C4 1.395 (3) N1—H1A 0.8600
C3—H3A 0.9300 N1—H1B 0.8600
C4—N3 1.333 (3) N2—H2N 0.8600
C4—C6 1.494 (3)
N1—C1—N3 119.3 (2) H5A—C5—H5C 109.5
N1—C1—N2 118.9 (2) H5B—C5—H5C 109.5
N3—C1—N2 121.8 (2) C4—C6—H6A 109.5
N2—C2—C3 117.2 (2) C4—C6—H6B 109.5
N2—C2—C5 117.3 (2) H6A—C6—H6B 109.5
C3—C2—C5 125.4 (2) C4—C6—H6C 109.5
C2—C3—C4 119.0 (2) H6A—C6—H6C 109.5
C2—C3—H3A 120.5 H6B—C6—H6C 109.5
C4—C3—H3A 120.5 C1—N1—H1A 120.0
N3—C4—C3 122.7 (2) C1—N1—H1B 120.0
N3—C4—C6 116.7 (2) H1A—N1—H1B 120.0
C3—C4—C6 120.6 (2) C2—N2—C1 121.99 (18)
C2—C5—H5A 109.5 C2—N2—H2N 119.0
C2—C5—H5B 109.5 C1—N2—H2N 119.0
H5A—C5—H5B 109.5 C1—N3—C4 117.2 (2)
C2—C5—H5C 109.5

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º)

Cg1 is the centroid of the C1–C4/N2/N3 ring.

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N1—H1A···Cli 0.86 2.42 3.260 (2) 167
N1—H1B···Clii 0.86 2.57 3.262 (2) 138
N2—H2N···Cl 0.86 2.22 3.042 (2) 161
C5—H5A···Cg1iii 0.96 3.00 3.446 (3) 110

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y, z+1/2; (ii) −x, y, −z+3/2; (iii) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+3/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: GW2128).

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. (2010). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Bruker (2000). SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Bruker (2010). APEX2 and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Cheng, X.-L., Gao, S. & Ng, S. W. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Eshtiagh-Hosseini, H., Mahjoobizadeh, M. & Mirzaei, M. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o2210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Hu, H.-L. & Yeh, C.-W. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o2925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812046569/gw2128sup1.cif

e-68-o3372-sup1.cif (15.7KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812046569/gw2128Isup2.hkl

e-68-o3372-Isup2.hkl (79.9KB, hkl)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812046569/gw2128Isup3.cml

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES