Abstract
This study delineated the incidence of metastatic involvement of neural stem cell (NSC) regions and further aimed to explore the feasibility of selectively sparing the NSC compartments during whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). A total of 2270 intracranial metastases in 488 patients were identified. Lesions were classified according to locations, including lesions in the NSC compartments (subventricular zone, SVZ, or hippocampus) and those in the rest of the brain/brainstem. The incidence of involvement of NSC regions was compared between oligometastatic patients (those with 1–4 lesions) and non-oligometastatic patients (those with 5 or more lesions) using a chi-square test. The volume of the NSC regions accounted for 2.23% of the whole brain, and the overall rate of metastatic lesions in NSC regions was 1.1% in 2270 metastases (25/2270), and 4.7% in 488 patients (23/488). Of the NSC region metastases, 7 (0.3%) involved the hippocampus and 18 (0.8%) occurred in the SVZ. Among the 7 hippocampal metastases identified in this study, 1/7 (14.3%) were found in oligometastatic patients, while 6/7 (85.7%) metastases were in non-oligometastatic patients. For metastases in the SVZ, all lesions occurred in non-oligometastatic patients with none in oligometastatic patients. Metastatic involvement of the NSC compartments was significantly lower in oligometastatic patients (0.15%, 1/670) than in non-oligometastatic patients (1.5%, 24/1600) (P < 0.001). Our retrospective review of 2270 metastases in 488 patients is that the volume of the compartments of NSC regions was 2.23% relative to the whole brain, but the incidence of involvement of the NSC compartments was 1.1%, and the vast majority of NSC lesions were found in non-oligometastatic patients. We believe our data supports selective reduction of doses for these aforementioned structures, when treating oligometastatic patients with WBRT and locally advanced-stage small-cell lung cancer patients with PCI.
Keywords: neural stem cells, hippocampus, subventricular zone, whole brain radiotherapy, prophylactic cranial irradiation
INTRODUCTION
It has been demonstrated that there are two main regions of human containing multipotent neural stem cells (NSCs): the subgranular zone (SGZ) within the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, and the subventricular zone (SVZ) on the lateral aspect of the lateral ventricle [1, 2]. These NSCs are capable of replacing adult neuron loss caused by various forms of harm (e.g. local ischemia, brain trauma, radiation exposure and neurodegenerative diseases) [3–5]. However, they are extremely sensitive to X-rays, and thus reduction of NSCs may play an important role in radiation-induced neurocognitive impairment [6, 7].
Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is one of the main treatments for brain metastases. In addition, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has become a recommended treatment for patients with locally advanced-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In these two treatment plans, whole brain (down to C2) radiotherapy with a full dose is regularly adopted. However, over many years of clinical practice, we have observed a very low incidence of involvement of the NSC regions in metastases. We hypothesized that it would be beneficial to spare these two areas when treating patients with either WBRT or PCI, thus minimizing radiation-induced neurocognitive impairment without a significant increase in the number of metastases. In order to confirm this hypothesis, we conducted this study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To assess the incidence of brain metastases in the NSC regions, the postcontrast T1-weighted, axial MRI scans (1.5T or 3.0T, slice thickness of 6 mm) of 490 consecutive patients who were treated in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from January 2010 to October 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. We excluded two patients with carcinomatous meningitis because of innumerable metastases in the brain. Therefore, outcomes of the present study are based on the analysis of 2270 lesions in 488 patients.
Currently, it is still technically difficult to accurately differentiate whether metastases in the hippocampus invade the SGZ of the dentate gyrus or not, so we defined metastases in the SGZ as including metastases in the hippocampus. The hippocampus was identified within the following anatomic boundaries: the anterior boundary includes the entire hippocampal head bound by the temporal horn; the lateral boundary is served by the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the temporal horn. Similarly, the medial boundary extends to the CSF in the uncal and ambient cisterns. Posteriorly, the hippocampal tail was outlined to the crus of the fornix (Fig. 1) [8]. The SVZs were defined as the 5 mm of tissue immediately adjacent to the lateral aspect of the lateral ventricles (Fig. 2). The volumes of the NSC regions and of the whole brain in all 488 patients were evaluated. Metastases were identified as postcontrast-enhanced lesions with typical features of metastatic disease, such as surrounding brain edema and mass effect. We assessed total metastases in all 488 patients. All reported metastases were categorized into metastases within NSC regions (hippocampus vs. SVZ) or those within the rest of the brain/brainstem (the frontal lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, occipital lobe, basal ganglia, cerebellum, and brainstem).
Fig. 1.

Hippocampal metastasis. Contrast-enhanced T1 axial image of a patient who has a metastasis within the hippocampus. The red contour represents the hippocampal contour; the green contour represents the metastasis.
Fig. 2.

SVZ metastasis. Contrast-enhanced T1 axial image of a patient who has a metastasis within the SVZ. The red contour represents the SVZ contour; the green contour represents the metastasis.
Individual patients were classified as patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), SCLC, breast cancer, and other cancers. Based on the primary cancer sites, other cancers of patients included prostate cancer, esophageal cancer, renal cancer, gynecological cancer, colon cancer, musculoskeletal cancer, melanoma, transitional cancer, and unknown cancer. Furthermore, patients were categorized as oligometastatic (1–4 metastases) and non-oligometastatic (5 or more metastases), and the corresponding incidence of NSC region metastases was assessed. The comparison of incidence between oligometastatic (1–4 lesions) and non-oligometastatic (5 or more lesions) patients was performed by Pearson's chi-square test. The statistical test was two-sided and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. PASW Statistics 13 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) was used for the statistical analysis.
RESULTS
We analyzed postcontrast T1-weighted MRI scan outcomes of 488 patients with brain metastases in the radiotherapy clinic. Demographic and disease-specific data of 488 patients are presented in Table 1. The majority of patients were diagnosed with NSCLC (58.0%) and more than half were male. Of the whole study population, a total of 2270 metastases were identified and the average number of metastases was 4.7. The analysis based on histological subtypes indicated that average numbers of brain metastases in NSCLC, SCLC, breast cancer, and other cancers were 4.8, 5.1, 5.3 and 3.2, respectively. (Table 2). Most frequently distributed sites of metastases in the brain contained frontal lobe (580/2270, i.e. 25.6%), parietal lobe (429/2270, i.e. 18.9%), temporal lobe (324/2270, i.e. 14.3%), occipital lobe (379/2270, i.e. 16.7%), and cerebellum (424/2270, i.e. 18.7%). These data are shown in Table 3.
Table 1.
Patient characteristics (n = 488)
| Number | Percent (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary site | ||
| NSCLC | 283 | 58.0 |
| SLCL | 44 | 9.0 |
| Breast | 88 | 18.0 |
| Others | 73 | 15.0 |
| Age | ||
| <60 | 341 | 69.9 |
| ≥60 | 147 | 30.1 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 262 | 53.7 |
| Female | 226 | 46.3 |
NSCLC = non-small-cell lung cancer, SCLC = small-cell lung cancer.
Table 2.
Number of brain metastases by histological subtypes
| Cancer type | No. patients | Total no. of metastases | Median no. of metastases per patient |
|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC | 283 | 1 346 | 4.8 |
| SLCL | 44 | 225 | 5.1 |
| Breast | 88 | 462 | 5.3 |
| Other | 73 | 237 | 3.2 |
| Total | 488 | 2 270 | 4.7 |
NSCLC = non-small-cell lung cancer, SCLC = small-cell lung cancer.
Table 3.
The distribution of metastases by location
| Location | n | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Frontal lobe | 580 | 25.6 |
| Temporal lobe* | 324 | 14.3 |
| Parietal lobe | 429 | 18.9 |
| Occipital lobe | 379 | 16.7 |
| Cerebellum | 424 | 18.7 |
| Brainstem | 39 | 1.7 |
| Basal ganglia | 70 | 3.1 |
| Hippocampus | 7 | 0.3 |
| SVZ | 18 | 0.8 |
| Total | 2 270 | 100.0 |
*Exclusion of metastases involved in hippocampus and SVZ, SVZ = subventricular zone.
Additionally, a single metastasis was the major imaging manifestation, accounting for approximately 32.8% of all subjects. As shown in Table 4, 378 of 488 patients (77.5%) had 1–4 brain metastases, and 44 patients (9.0%) had more than 10 metastases.
Table 4.
Metastatic frequency distribution
| No. metastases | No. patients |
|---|---|
| 1 | 160 |
| 2 | 90 |
| 3 | 62 |
| 4 | 36 |
| 5 | 28 |
| 6 | 17 |
| 7 | 20 |
| 8 | 13 |
| 9 | 8 |
| 10 | 10 |
| >10 | 44 |
The volumes of the NSC regions and the whole brain in all 488 patients were evaluated, and the two corresponding means ( ± standard deviation) were 6.36 ± 0.38 cm3 and 284.77 ± 19.34 cm3, respectively. The proportion of the compartments of NSCs was 2.23% in the whole brain. Of a total of 2270 metastatic lesions, 25 cases (1.1%) involved NSC regions, among which 7/25 (28%) involved the hippocampus, while 18/25 (72%) involved the other NSC region known as the SVZ. The rate of involvement of the SVZ was 18/2270 (0.8%) of all intracranial metastases and 18/488 (3.7%) of all patients. The corresponding rates for the hippocampus were 7/2270 (0.3%) and 7/488 (1.4%). In 18 patients with SVZ metastases, there were a total of 415 metastatic lesions and 23.1 metastases per patient. So, even among the patients with a heavy burden of metastases, SVZ lesions accounted for only 4.3% (18/415) of their total lesions. In 7 patients with hippocampus metastases, a total of 203 lesions and 32.9 metastases per patient was observed, and thus the rate was 3.4% (7/203). These results are presented in Table 5.
Table 5.
Pattern of involvement in patients with NSC region metastases
| SVZ | Hippocampus | |
|---|---|---|
| Involvement of patients | 18 | 7 |
| No. of specific metastases in involved patients | 18 | 7 |
| Total metastases in involved patients | 415 | 203 |
| Median no. of metastases in involved patients | 23.1 | 32.9 |
| % of specific metastases (relative to total metastases) in involved patients | 4.3% | 3.4% |
As shown in Table 6, of the 18 cases of SVZ metastases, none of them were observed in oligometastatic patients. In the case of metastases in the hippocampus, 1/7 (14.3%) of metastases occurred in oligometastatic patients, while 6/7 (85.7%) metastases occurred in non-oligometastatic patients. Also, 348 oligometastatic and 140 non-oligometastatic patients were respectively diagnosed with 670 and 1600 metastatic lesions. Hence, in oligometastatic patients, the rate of metastases in the SVZ was 0/670 (0%), while the rate was 1/670 (0.15%) for hippocampus metastases. Over all patients, the rate of involvement of the SVZ and hippocampus was 0.8% and 0.3%, respectively. Finally, statistical tests revealed that metastatic involvement of the NSC regions was significantly lower in oligometastatic patients (0.15%, 1/670) than that in non-oligometastatic patients (1.5%, 24/1600) (P < 0.001).
Table 6.
Incidence of NSC lesions in oligometastatic and non-oligometastatic patients
| SVZ | Hippocampus | |
|---|---|---|
| No. of specific metastases | 18 | 7 |
| No. of specific metastases in oligometastatic patients | 0 | 1 |
| No. of specific metastases in non-oligometastatic patients | 18 | 6 |
| % of specific metastases (relative to total metastases) in oligometastatic patients | 0% (0/670) | 0.15% (1/670) |
| % of specific metastases (relative to total metastases) in non-oligometastatic patients | 1.1% (18/1 600) | 0.38% (6/1 600) |
| % of specific metastases (relative to total metastases) in all patients | 0.8% (18/2 270) | 0.3% (7/2 270) |
Table 7 demonstrated percentages of histological types in 25 lesions with NSC region metastases (NSCLC, 11; SCLC 6; breast cancer 6; others 2). Regions of NSC metastases accounted for 0.82% of all lesions in patients with NSCLC (hippocampus, 0.22%; SVZ, 0.6%), 2.7% of all lesions in patients with SCLC (hippocampus, 0.44%; SVZ, 2.2%), 1.3% of all lesions in patients with breast cancer (hippocampus, 0.22%; SVZ, 1.1%), and 0.84% of all lesions in patients with other histological types (hippocampus, 0.84%; SVZ, 0%).
Table 7.
Incidence of involvement of NSC regions by histological subtypes
| Histology | Total no. of metastases | NSC metastases (% of total) | Hippocampal metastases (% of total) | SVZ metastases (% of total) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSCLC | 1 346 | 11 (0.82) | 3 (0.22) | 8 (0.6) |
| SLCL | 225 | 6 (2.7) | 1 (0.44) | 5 (2.2) |
| Breast | 462 | 6 (1.3) | 1 (0.22) | 5 (1.1) |
| Other | 237 | 2 (0.84) | 2 (0.84) | 0 (0) |
NSCLC = non-small-cell lung cancer, SCLC = small-cell lung cancer.
DISCUSSION
The incidence of brain metastases in patients with malignant cancers has been reported as up to 30% [9] and varies among different cancer types. For some malignancies, the rate is even higher. For NSCLC, 55% of patients ultimately develop brain metastases during their clinical course [10]. Also, the cumulative incidence of two years' brain metastases in extensive SCLC patients is more than 50% [11]. Effective multimodality regimes which combine chemotherapy with radiation and/or surgery have improved overall patient survival and local control of primary site cancers, so the relative importance of brain metastases has increased [12–14].
WBRT, one of the main therapies, can be used to independently manage brain metastases, or may be combined with either surgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) [15–17]. Adjuvant WBRT after the resection of a single brain metastasis has been demonstrated to reduce the possibility of malignant recurrence at local and distant sites in the brain, and omission of WBRT probably increases the risk of recurrent brain metastases [16, 18–20]. Similarly for PCI, a randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the role of PCI in patients with extensive SCLC who had responded to chemotherapy. The results showed that PCI not only reduced the incidence of symptomatic brain metastases, but also prolonged disease-free and overall survival, consistent with a meta-analysis [11, 21].
The RTOG 9508 randomized trial showed that there was a survival benefit and advantage of Karnofsky Performance Status in the group being treated with a combination of WBRT and SRS, compared with monotherapy of WBRT. However, this clinical trial did not directly contrast the difference in neurocognition between the two plans [22]. Chang et al. assessed the decline of neurocognitive function among patients with brain metastases who were treated by radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation. The trial was stopped because of clear results. Patients assigned to receive SRS plus WBRT were more likely to suffer from a significant decline in learning and memory function than patients treated with SRS alone [23].
A number of studies have investigated the effects of irradiation on the brain. NSCs have been well studied, because they are sensitive to irradiation. Studies have found that radiation-induced impairment of hippocampal neurogenesis is associated with hippocampal-dependent memory deficits in animal models, and radiation-induced loss of neural stem cells, resulting in the inability to repair damage, which might be linked to decline of executive function, consolidation of memory, and other late sequelae [6, 24–26].
Therefore, sparing these critical structures in WBRT and PCI may enable the brain to repair damage caused by cerebral irradiation, and help preserve neurocognitive function. The distribution of metastases is proportional to the blood flow in brain compartments, and about 80% of metastases are located in the cerebral hemispheres, 15% in the cerebellum, and 5% in the brainstem [27]. However, there is no accurate data to describe the distribution of brain metastases within the NSC regions.
Recently, two research groups have investigated the incidence of hippocampal metastases. Marsh et al. from Rush University Medical Center reviewed records of 697 metastatic lesions in 107 patients and found that only 16/697 metastases (2.29%) involved the hippocampus. The incidence of hippocampal metastases in oligometastatic patients (those with 1–3 metastases only) was 0.97% (1/103) and one of 53 oligometastatic patients (1.9%) had hippocampal metastases [28]. A safety profile for RTOG 0933 observed 1133 metastatic lesions in 371 consecutive patients from two separate institutions. They found that none of the metastases were within the hippocampus; metastases within 5 mm of the hippocampus were observed in 32/371 patients (8.6%) and 34/1133 brain metastases (3.0%) [8].
To the best of our knowledge, no other study has investigated the metastatic involvement of the other NSC compartment, the SVZ. In our retrospective review of 2270 brain metastases in 488 patients, we found that the rate of involvement of the SVZ was 18/2270 (0.8%) for all intracranial metastases, and 18/488 (3.7%) for all patients, while the rate for hippocampus was 7/2270 (0.3%) and 7/488 (1.4%), respectively. In 18 patients with SVZ metastases, there was a total 415 lesions with a mean of 23.1 metastases per patient. So, even among these patients with a heavy burden of metastases, SVZ lesions accounted for only 4.3% (18/415) of their total lesions. The corresponding rate in the hippocampus was 3.4% (7/203). Among the 18 patients with SVZ metastases identified in this study, none of the lesions occurred in oligometastatic patients and all of lesions occurred in non-oligometastatic patients. For metastases in the hippocampus, 1/7 metastases (14.3%) occurred in oligometastatic patients, while 6/7 metastases (85.7%) occurred in non-oligometastatic patients. Finally, we conclude that metastatic involvement of the SVZ and the hippocampus was 0.8% and 0.3% of all lesions, respectively, and involvement of the NSC regions was lower in oligometastatic patients (0.15%, 1/670) than in non-oligometastatic patients (1.5%, 24/1600) (P < 0.001). Above all, the volume of compartments of the NSCs was 2.23% relative to the whole brain. However, the overall rate of metastases in the NSC regions was 1.1%. Thus, the occurrence of brain metastases per unit in the NSC regions is not equal to the whole brain and is relatively low in comparison to rest of the brain. Tomé et al. also revealed a relatively low incidence of brain metastases in the perihippocampal region [29].
The metastatic incidence of the NSC regions in patients with SCLC (2.7%) seemed to be higher than that of others (0.82% in SCLC, 1.3% in breast cancer, and 0.84% in other cancers). Because of the low morbidity of SCLC, we only collected 44 patients with SCLC with a total of 225 metastases in the present retrospective review. In order to obtain more accurate data, it is necessary for future studies to assess more cases with SCLC and brain metastases through a multi-cancer center database.
Barani et al. have shown the dosimetrical feasibility of NSC-preserving radiotherapy, even when the target was a periventricular lesion. They used inverse-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy in two clinical scenarios—brain metastatic disease and primary high-grade glioma—to achieve cumulative dose reductions of 65% and 25% in the NSC compartments, respectively, compared with conventional radiotherapy [30]. Investigators at Rush University Medical Center also tested the feasibility of dosimetrically sparing the hippocampus and the SVZ (a 5-mm expansion around the lateral ventricle) during helical tomotherapy with WBRT and PCI. They found mean doses of 11.5 Gy in the PCI plan and 11.8 Gy in the WBRT plan for the hippocampus and SVZ, while treating the rest of the brain with 30 Gy in 15 fractions (PCI) or 35 Gy in 14 fractions (WBRT) with a V100 of 95%. They achieved the reduction in BED late effects of 73.8% in the hippocampus and 65.8% in the SVZ through a PCI study plan, compared with a standard plan. For the WBRT study plan, the reductions were 78.6% and 70.8% in the hippocampus and the SVZ, respectively [31]. Thus, to dosimetrically spare the NSC compartments has been proven to be feasible.
As a retrospective and single-institution study, our data has some inevitable limitations. However, our results are consistent with other studies [8, 28]. Thus, we believe that it is reasonable to selectively reduce doses to the two NSC compartments, while simultaneously treating other parts of the brain with full doses. The rate of involvement of NSC regions after conformal avoidance with WBRT and PCI needs to be elucidated in future clinical trials. Based on current findings of the NSC region involvement in oligometastatic patients, we are performing a study of dosimetric feasibility to examine the advantages and risks of sparing NSC-containing areas in oligometastatic patients (WBRT plan) and extensive SCLC patients with a response to chemotherapy (PCI plan). Plans will be conducted in two situations: PCI (25 Gy in 10 fractions) and standard WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions).
CONCLUSIONS
Our retrospective review of 2270 metastases in 488 patients found that the volume of the NSC regions accounted for 2.23% of the whole brain, but the incidence of involvement of the NSC compartments was 1.1%, and almost all of NSC lesions were limited in non-oligometastatic patients. We believe our data support the case for selective reduction of doses to these aforementioned structures when treating oligometastatic patients with WBRT, or locally advanced-stage SCLC patients with PCI.
REFERENCES
- 1.Eriksson PS, Perfilieva E, Björk-Eriksson T, et al. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med. 1998;4:1313–7. doi: 10.1038/3305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Taupin P, Gage FH. Adult neurogenesis and neural stem cells of the central nervous system in mammals. J Neurosci Res. 2002;69:745–9. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Arias-Carrión O, Verdugo-Díaz L, Feria-Velasco A, et al. Neurogenesis in the subventricular zone following transcranial magnetic field stimulation and nigrostriatal lesions. J Neurosci Res. 2004;78:16–28. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Arias-Carrión O, Hernández-López S, Ibañez-Sandoval O, et al. Neuronal precursors within the adult rat subventricular zone differentiate into dopaminergic neurons after substantia nigra lesion and chromaffin cell transplant. J Neurosci Res. 2006;84:1425–37. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aimone JB, Wiles J, Gage FH. Potential role for adult neurogenesis in the encoding of time in new memories. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:723–7. doi: 10.1038/nn1707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mizumatsu S, Monje ML, Morhardt DR, et al. Extreme sensitivity of adult neurogenesis to low doses of X-irradiation. Cancer Res. 2003;63:4021–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hellström NA, Björk-Eriksson T, Blomgren K, et al. Differential recovery of neural stem cells in the subventricular zone and dentate gyrus after ionizing radiation. Stem Cells. 2009;27:634–41. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gondi V, Tome WA, Marsh J, et al. Estimated risk of perihippocampal disease progression after hippocampal avoidance during whole-brain radiotherapy: Safety profile for RTOG 0933. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95:327–31. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.02.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Scoccianti S, Ricardi U. Treatment of brain metastases: Review of phase III randomised controlled trials. Radiother Oncol. 2012;102:168–79. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.08.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chen AM, Jahan TM, Jablons DM, et al. Risk of cerebral metastases and neurological death after pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer: clinical implications for the subsequent management of the brain. Cancer. 2007;109:1668–75. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aupérin A, Arriagada R, Pignon JP, et al. Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Overview Collaborative Group. Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small-cell lung cancer in complete remission. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:476–84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908123410703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Robnett TJ, Machtay M, Stevenson JP, et al. Factors affecting the risk of brain metastases after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1344–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.5.1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Law A, Karp DD, Dipetrillo T, et al. Emergence of increased cerebral metastasis after high-dose preoperative radiotherapy with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;92:160–4. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010701)92:1<160::aid-cncr1304>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Andre F, Grunenwald D, Pujol JL, et al. Patterns of relapse of N2 nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy. Cancer. 2001;91:2394–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Peacock KH, Lesser GJ. Current therapeutic approaches in patients with brain metastases. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2006;7:479–89. doi: 10.1007/s11864-006-0023-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McPherson CM, Suki D, Feiz-Erfan I, et al. Adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy after surgical resection of single brain metastases. Neuro Oncol. 2010;12:711–9. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rades D, Kueter JD, Veninga T, et al. Whole brain radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery (WBRT+SRS) versus surgery plus whole brain radiotherapy (OP+WBRT) for 1–3 brain metastases: Results of a matched pair analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:400–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brown P, Asher AL, Farace E. Adjuvant whole brain radiotherapy: strong emotions decide but rationale studies are needed. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:1305–09. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Patchell R, Regine WF, Loeffler JS, et al. Radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy for brain metastases. JAMA. 2006;296:2089–90. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.17.2089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Regine WF, Huhn JL, Patchell RA, et al. Risk of symptomatic brain tumor recurrence and neurologic deficit after radiosurgery alone in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: results and implications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:333–8. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02645-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Slotman B, Faivre-Finn C, Kramer G, et al. Prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:664–72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Andrews DW, Scott CB, Sperduto PW, et al. Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases : phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1665–72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16250-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chang EL, Wefel JS, Hess KR, et al. Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:1037–44. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70263-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Barani IJ, Benedict SH, Lin PS. Neural stem cells: implications for the conventional radiotherapy of central nervous system malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:324–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rola R, Raber J, Rizk A, et al. Radiation-induced impairment of hippocampal neurogenesis is associated with cognitive deficits in young mice. Exp Neurol. 2004;188:316–30. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fike JR, Rola R, Limoli CL. Radiation response of neural precursor cells. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2007;18:115–27. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2006.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Norden AD, Wen PY, Kesari S. Brain metastases. Curr Opin Neurol. 2005;18:654–61. doi: 10.1097/01.wco.0000191514.37498.2b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Marsh JC, Herskovic AM, Gielda BT, et al. Intracranial metastatic disease spares the limbic circuit: a review of 697 metastatic lesions in 107 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:504–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tomé WA, Bender ET, Gondi V, et al. In response to "The distribution of brain metastases in the perihippocampal region (regarding Gondi et al. In: van Kesteren, et al., editors. Radiother. Oncol. Vol. 95. 2010. pp. 327–331. Radiother Oncol 2011;98:284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Barani IJ, Cuttino LW, Benedict SH, et al. Neural stem cell-preserving external-beam radiotherapy of central nervous system malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:978–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Marsh JC, Godbole R, Diaz AZ, et al. Sparing of the neural stem cell compartment during whole-brain radiation therapy: adosimetric study using helical tomotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78:946–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
