Skip to main content
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine logoLink to Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
. 2012 Sep 30;18(2):143–150. doi: 10.1007/s12199-012-0304-8

Reference value and annual trend of white blood cell counts among adult Japanese population

Sonoko Sakuragi 1, Jiro Moriguchi 1, Fumiko Ohashi 2, Masayuki Ikeda 2,
PMCID: PMC3590320  PMID: 23054993

Abstract

Objectives

This study was initiated to establish the reference values (the 95 % lower limit in particular) for white blood cell (WBC) counts in peripheral blood of general Japanese population. Additional attempts were made to examine whether the reference range had changed in the past 100 years, and which factors had induced such change in WBC counts.

Methods

Data employed were WBC counts of >100 thousand apparently healthy Japanese men, collected in 2002 and in 2010, respectively. Information on smoking habits was collected simultaneously.

Results

The distribution of WBC counts was essentially normal. Arithmetic mean (AM) WBC was 6,248 cells/mm3 in 2002 and 6,162 cells/mm3 in 2010. Based on the 2010 observation, 3 × 103 WBCs/mm3 (after rounding of the figure) was identified as the 95 % lower limit of the reference value for the population. No clear age dependency was detected. Smoking induced elevation in WBC, whereas WBC returned to the level of never smokers after quitting for 3 or more years.

Conclusions

Historical review disclosed a secular trend of decrease in WBC in the past 100 years, so that about 8 % of never-smoking men would be considered leukocytopenic according to the conventional cutoff of 4 × 103 cells/mm3 as a screening level. Decreased smoking rates and improved general hygiene are discussed as possible factors for WBC count reduction. Thus, WBC count of 3 × 103 cells/mm3 is recommended as the 95 % lower limit of the reference value for screening cases with reduced WBC counts.

Keywords: Annual trend, Japanese, Leukocyte counts, Men, Reference value, White blood cell counts

Introduction

Counting of leukocytes [white blood cells (WBCs)], a classical method to detect hematological abnormalities, is still an important item in occupational health examination. For example, whereas benzene-induced leukocytopenia [1] has seldom been encountered recently in industrialized countries including Japan as industrial use of this well-known hematotoxic solvent has been severely controlled in recent years [2, 3], the WBC count stands as a critical health effect marker in health examination for radiation-exposed subjects [4].

In preventive medicine, therefore, establishment of the reference value for WBC counts together with clarification of the range of distribution among Japanese general population are of practical importance. It has been reported that ethnic difference exists in WBC counts among adult women [5] and presumably in general population as a whole, which suggests the need for studies on local populations such as Japanese for evaluation of Japanese subjects.

Substantial compilations of WBC count data for apparently healthy men were available to this study group. Taking advantage of these compilations, this study was initiated to clarify the current levels of WBC counts in general Japanese population. A secular trend of shift in the WBC counts and possible age dependency were also examined in comparison with retrieved reports on WBC counts for the Japanese population in the past. Whereas the materials examined were for men, it was expected that the conclusions should be applicable also to women, as there would be no gender difference in WBC counts [6].

Subjects and methods

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kyoto Industrial Health Association. Each and all of the subjects studied provided informed consent in writing, with understanding that physicians and/or paramedical staff of the Association might use the results of the health examinations for medical education and research purposes under the condition that the results be presented generally on a group basis or with due respect to anonymity of the subjects.

The subjects were apparently healthy adult Japanese men who underwent hematological examinations (including WBC counting) as part of routine annual health check-up in clinical facilities of this Association. Those who were under medical treatments were excluded. In practice, more than 100 and 130 thousand cases were available during the 1-year period from 1 August 2002 to 31 July 2003 (the 2002 data) and during another 1-year period from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011 (the 2010 data), respectively. Many of the examinees were full-time employees of enterprises of various sizes, but self-employed people, university students, and local residents were also included.

Blood samples were taken by venopuncture of cubital vein, and immediately heparinized. Hematological examinations were conducted by use of automated blood cell counters. Depending on the survey year, two types of counters were used, i.e., Sysmex SE9000 (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) in 2002, and ABX PENTRA XL80 (Horiba, Kyoto, Japan) in 2010. A preliminary study with human blood samples to examine possible intercounter difference in the results [7] gave a regression line of Y = −361 + 0.993X (r = 0.997, p < 0.01, n = 97), where X and Y are the measures by Sysmex and PENTRA, respectively. This close agreement was taken to suggest that no adjustment was necessary in evaluation. By means of self-administered questionnaires, the subjects were asked in addition on their smoking habits, i.e., if they were current, former, or never smokers; in case of former smokers, they were further asked the duration of smoking abstinence, whether it was less than 3 years or 3 years and longer.

For time trend analysis, literature was sorted by use of a retrieval system, “Ichushi-Web,” a system founded by the Japan Medical Abstracts Society (Tokyo, Japan) in 1983 specifically for Japan-based literature published in the 1980s and afterwards; it was found that the target literature was usually in Japanese, for which search by PubMed was not productive enough. Literature published in the 1970s and earlier was traced by taking advantage of references given in published articles. Thus, best efforts were made to collect publications even in the period not covered by the retrieval system.

With regard to statistical analyses, normal distribution was assumed for WBC counts, as discussed later in detail, so that the distributions were expressed in terms of arithmetic means (AMs) and arithmetic standard deviations (ASDs). Unpaired t test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) (followed by post hoc test, Scheffé) were employed to detect possible significance of differences in the distributions. Possible difference in parameters between two regression lines were examined after Ichihara [8].

Results

Distribution patterns among total subjects, smokers, and nonsmokers

Distribution histograms for total, never-smoking, and currently smoking cases are depicted in Fig. 1a–c, respectively, to show that the distributions were essentially normal. It should be noted that the mode of WBC counts for never smokers [WBC count, about 5.0 × 103 cells/mm3; Fig. 1b] was slightly smaller than that for current smokers [WBC count; about 6.0 × 103 cells/mm3; Fig. 1c].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Distribution histograms of white blood cell counts among Japanese men, as studied in 2010: a total cases, b never smokers, c current smokers

WBC counts in 2002 and in 2010

In practice, 103,492 and 130,431 cases were available in 2002 and 2010, respectively. Breakdown of the total cases by smoking habits to never, former, and current smokers (Table 1) showed that former smokers were older than the other two groups by about 5 years. When WBC counts were compared, WBC counts for the total group in 2010 differed significantly from the counts in 2002 (p < 0.01), but the net difference (a decrease) in AM was as small as 86 cells/mm3. Similar comparison of WBC for the never-smoker group in 2002 and in 2010 also showed a significant (p < 0.01) difference with a small net increase in AM WBC of 57 cells/mm3. It was considered that both changes were medically meaningless, although statistically significant due to the large numbers of cases studied (i.e., >30,000 cases even for never smokers).

Table 1.

Basic parameters

Year of study No. of cases Age (years) White blood cell counts (cells/mm3)
 Group by smoking AM ASD p AM ASD 2.5 percentile 5.0 percentile 95.0 percentile 97.5 percentile p
2002
 Total 103,492 43.0 12.0 6,248 1,751 2,325 2,815 9,681 10,171
 Never smokers 34,298 42.5 12.3 5,609 1,373 2,534 2,918 8,299 8,684
 Former smokers 12,665 47.9 11.7 a 5,713 1,384 2,613 3,001 8,424 8,812 a
 Current smokers 56,529 42.2 11.7 a,b 6,756 1,864 2,581 3,103 10,409 10,931 a,b
2010
 Total 130,431 44.2 11.7 6,162 1,719 2,311 2,793 9,531 10,012
 Never smokers 40,748 41.2 11.6 5,666 1,412 2,503 2,899 8,434 8,829
 Former smokers 36,041 48.3 11.1 a 5,750 1,441 2,522 2,925 8,575 8,979 a
 Current smokers 53,642 43.7 11.5 a,b 6,815 1,884 2,596 3,123 10,507 11,034 a,b

ap for difference from never smokers by Scheffé; for p ≤ 0.01

bp for difference from former smokers by Scheffé; for p ≤ 0.01

WBC counts for current smokers were significantly higher (p < 0.01) than those for never or former smokers in both 2002 and 2010. The net difference was about 1,000 cells/mm3. In contrast, the net difference between former and never smokers was quite smaller, e.g., about 100 cells/mm3, although it was statistically significant (p < 0.01).

Further calculation for 5 percentile values to find the 95 % lower limit of the WBC counts (Table 1) revealed that, in 2010, the values were 2,899, 2,925, and 3,123 cells/mm3 for never, former, and current smokers, respectively. After rounding the figures, 3.0 × 103 cells/mm3 would be the 95 % lower limit of the current reference for general population including current smokers.

Effect of abstinence of smoking

Analysis of 2010 data on the duration of abstinence of smoking showed that AM WBC counts for those with abstinence for 3 years or longer (5,591 cells/mm3; n = 603) did not differ significantly (p > 0.10 by Scheffé) from the values for never smokers (5,666 cells/mm3; n = 40,748), whereas AM WBC for those who had quit for less than 3 years (5,753 cells/mm3; n = 35,438) was still more than that for never smokers.

Possible effect of aging

To examine possible age-dependent changes in WBC counts, total cases were divided by decades of age, and 7 age groups were subjected to ANOVA (Table 2). It should be noted that the cases at 80+ years of age were limited, i.e., 48 and 11 cases in 2002 and 2010, respectively (<0.05 % of the cases studied). It turned out that there was a steady trend of decrease in the three youngest age groups in both 2002 and 2010. For older ages, however, the changes were in the opposite direction in the 50–59-year group in 2002 and insignificant in 2010. In addition, the net difference between the age groups was <150 cells/mm3. In overall evaluation, therefore, it was concluded that the age-dependent changes should be not meaningful medicobiologically, although statistically significant in some cases.

Table 2.

White blood cell counts (cells/mm3) by decade of age of never smokers

Group by decade of age (years) Year of study
2002 2010
No.a AM ASD 5 percentile 95 percentile pb No.a AM ASD 5 percentile 95 percentile pb
20–29 5,762 5,728.2 1,434.6 2,916 8,540 7,455 5,846.5 1,459.0 2,987 8,706
30–39 10,031 5,600.8 1,382.5 2,891 8,311 ↓↓ 11,563 5,685.5 1,414.0 2,914 8,457 ↓↓
40–49 7,367 5,539.5 1,333.6 2,926 8,153 ↓↓ 12,173 5,588.8 1,384.3 2,876 8,302 ↓↓
50–59 8,134 5,603.4 1,368.0 2,922 8,285 ↑↑ 6,440 5,606.3 1,382.3 2,897 8,316 ns
60–69 2,542 5,613.8 1,303.8 3,058 8,169 ns 2,787 5,587.3 1,419.9 2,804 8,370 ns
70–79 414 5,462.3 1,342.3 2,831 8,093 319 5,599.7 1,402.0 2,852 8,348 ns
80+ 48 5,391.7 1,411.9 2,624 8,159 ns 11 5,427.3 1,530.4 2,428 8,427 ns

aNumber of cases

bp for difference from the immediately younger group by Scheffé; two arrows, one arrow, and ns show p ≤0.01, ≤0.05, and >0.05, respectively. The direction of arrows indicates an increase or a decrease

Discussion

The present analysis has made it clear that WBC count of 3.0 × 103 cells/mm3 can be used as the cutoff level for screening cases with reduced WBC counts. Taking a conventional criterion of 4.0 × 103 WBCs/mm3 as the lower limit of the normal range for WBC counts [6], 7,206 and 3,256 cases of total (5.52 %) and never-smoking men (7.99 %) in 2010, respectively, would be below the limit. With a tentative limit of 3.5 × 103 cells/mm3, the prevalence would be 2,152 cases (1.65 %) and 984 cases (2.41 %), respectively.

WBC counts have been a focus of medical attention since as early as the 1910s. In practice, 15 articles reporting WBC counts of Japanese men at the time of the study were available through literature survey [6, 922]; they are tabulated in Table 3 in combination with the present results. The target populations were men in many cases, whereas WBC counts for women were reported either separately or in combination with those for men. In most of the reports, the results were presented in terms of AM and ASD. Breakdown by decades of years of age were also presented in selected cases [913], and the results of such cases are presented as a range of AM values in Table 3.

Table 3.

Historical review of reference values for WBC counts in healthy Japanese

Authors Years Ref. Sex (M for men, W for women) WBC counts (cells/mm3) Notes
AM ASD Min. Max.
Masai 1914 [14] M 7,473 4,220 12,600 Healthy medical students
Kura 1925 [15] M 7,718 4,200 12,900 Healthy army soldiers
Kitajima 1928 [9] M + W 5,981–7,827a 4,200 12,437 Healthy men and women of various occupations aged 20–60 years
Komiya 1938 [6] 4,000 10,000 Statement in a textbook
[6] 6,000 8,000
Miyazu 1943 [10] M + W 6,652–7,295a 4,700 13,800 Healthy subjects
Asai et al. 1974 [11] M 6,000–7,000b <4,000 >11,000 Citation of the study by Hibino which was conducted in 1954–1955
Miyasaka 1957 [12] M 6,616–6,933 4,000 10,000
1957 [12] W 6,545–6,870 3,500 9,000
Maekawa and Kinugasa 1957 [16] M + W 6,480 1,110 ≤60 years
1957 [16] M + W 6,680 110 18–30 years
Inoue et al. 1959 [17] M 6,314 1,375 2,550–3,000 13,350–13,800 Adult healthy workers; min. and max. values are shown by ranges
1959 [17] W 6,286 1,465 2,550–3,000 12,000–12,450 Adult healthy workers; min. and max. values are shown by ranges
Shirakura et al. 1978 [18] M 6,949 1,632
1978 [18] W 6,756 1,852
Goto et al. 1993 [13] M 6,080–6,380 3,400 9,190
1993 [13] W 5,500–5,650 3,270 7,930
Okabe 1995 [19] M 7,500 1,400 Up to 59 years
1995 [19] W 7,600 1,100 Up to 59 years
Shiga et al. 1999 [20] M + W 6,800 2,900 10,700 Minimum and maximum values reported for each of decades of years of age (20–69 years)
Hasegawa et al. 2002 [21] M + W 5,795 1,521 See footnote c
Tatsukawa et al. 2008 [22] M 6,700 1,700
2008 [22] W 6,000 1,600
The present study 2002 M 6,248 1,751 20–60-year-old men (for details, see Table 1)
2002 M (never smokers) 5,609 1,373 20–60-year-old never-smoking men (for details, see Table 1)
2010 M 6,162 1,719 20–60-year-old men (for details, see Table 1)
2010 M (never smokers) 5,666 1,412 20–60-year-old never-smoking men (for details, see Table 1)

aVariation by decades of age, with no consistent age-dependent trends

bThe range of modes for each of decades of years of age (20–59 years)

cData on smokers and nonsmokers were combined by the present authors for a whole group

Perusal of Table 3 suggests that WBC counts appear to be reducing with time. For quantitative evaluation of a possible secular trend of the decrease, one representative value was selected for each article. In cases where AM values were shown as a range, an arithmetic mean of the lower and upper limit values was taken. As sex difference in WBC counts has been considered as insignificant among Japanese populations (e.g., [6]), the values for men and women in combination (shown as M + W in Table 3) were taken, whereas values for women only in Table 3 were not taken up because values for women were always accompanied by values for men.

WBC counting was conducted manually in early time studies, whereas it is presently by use of automated cell counters. Possible method-dependent difference was, however, not taken into account as it was reported that no differences in the results were observed between manual and instrumental counting [23], while no information on the method of counting was available for each report in the literature.

A linear regression analysis was conducted, taking year of publication and WBC counts on the horizontal and vertical axis, respectively (Fig. 2a); the data cited from Asai et al. [11] were prepared by Hibino in 1954–1955, and therefore the year 1954–1955 was taken in preparing Fig. 2. The publication year and WBC counts correlated significantly (r = 0.581, p < 0.05, n = 16) with a calculated regression line of Y = 25518 − 9.538X, where X is the year of publication and Y is the reported WBC counts. Worthy of note in Fig. 1 is that the slope is negative (i.e., <0), and that the present study results for 2002 and 2010 lie between the regression line and the curve for the lower limit of the 95 % range of the regression line. As a result, in 2010 for example, the prevalence of those with less than 4,000 WBC/mm3 is as high as 8 % among never-smoking men, as discussed above. Thus, care should be practiced in making diagnosis of leukocytopenia, e.g., for radiation-exposed subjects.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Secular trends in average white blood cell counts in peripheral blood of adult male Japanese subjects. Each dot in the figure represents a representative arithmetic mean value in a report. See the text for selection of each represent value. The line in the middle of the figure is a calculated regression line, and two dotted curves on both sides of the line show the 95 % range for the means

It was considered possible that concepts and practice of statistical analysis made substantial progress in the late 1940s. Thus, the studies conducted in 1950+ were re-evaluated separately from previous studies. The regression analysis (Fig. 2b) gave a calculated regression line of Y = 12,544 − 3.023X (r = 0.150, p > 0.05, n = 12), where X is the year of publication and Y is the reported WBC counts. Although the slope appeared to be less steep (i.e., −3.023), it was negative (i.e., <0) and did not differ significantly (p < 0.05) from the slope (−9.538) for total cases. The absence of the difference might be due to wide variation around the regression line. The lack of statistical significance of the correlation coefficient (r = 0.150, p > 0.05) may be attributable at least in part to the narrowing of the study year range from 96 to 55 years.

No reports were available on secular trend analyses in WBC counts for other (i.e., non-Japanese) populations. In the years around 2000, Bovill et al. [24] reported 6.2–6.4 × 103 cells/mm3 for men, and 6.1–6.2 × 103 cells/mm3 for women. In addition, van Oostrom et al. [25] reported 5.41 × 103 cells/mm3 for healthy adult men. Compared with these levels, surveys in the years around 1980 reported somewhat higher levels. For example, Godwin et al. [26] observed in a large-scale survey that the means were 6.0–6.5 × 103 cells/mm3 (with small age-dependent variations) and that the minimum and the maximum were 3.5 and 12.0 × 103 cells/mm3, respectively. Barrett et al. [27] found that the mean and the range for WBC counts were 6.3 (4.2–11.2) × 103 cells/mm3 for men and 6.8 (4.0–10.4) ×103 cells/mm3 for women. Galen [28] reported that mean WBC counts were 6.7 to 7.0 × 10cells/mm3 (3.5 and 11.9 × 103 cells/mm3 for 2.5 and 97.5 percentile, respectively). According to Giorno et al. [29], WBC counts were in ranges of 3.13–10.84 × 103 cells/mm3 for men and 3.28–11.05 × 103 cells/mm3 for women. Thus, it appears likely that higher WBC counts were reported in the years about 20 years ago than at present time, although the ethnic backgrounds of the populations studied might vary.

With regard to possible explanations for the secular decrease in WBC counts in Japan, it is quite conceivable that at least two factors have been involved, i.e., infectious diseases and smoking. First, the decrease may be associated with reduced prevalence of infectious diseases, as WBC counts are known to increase in response to infections. For example, the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan recorded 533 × 103 cases of patients with infectious diseases (including parasitosis and tuberculosis) in 1953. The number stayed at a high level of 563 × 103 cases in 1963, but was reduced to 219 × 103 cases in 2008 [3032]. No separate statistics are available for parasitosis among adult population. School health statistics, however, suggest an even more dramatic improvement in hygienic conditions. Namely, the percentage for 6–8-year-old children in primary schools who had eggs of gastrointestinal tract parasites was 50.7 % in 1953, which dropped to 17.9 % in 1963 and 0.4 % in 2008 [3335].

Another possible cause of reduction in WBC counts is the increase in the never-smoking ratio, as previously pointed out by Schwartz et al. [36]. Articles are accumulating to report that smoking induces an increase in WBC counts, although this may not be due to inflammation of the respiratory tract [37]. Thus, Smith et al. [38] observed that WBC counts were higher (7.4 × 103 cells/mm3) among 839 male current smokers than among 2,421 male never smokers (6.2 × 103 cells/mm3). The value for 3,597 former smokers (6.4 × 103 cells/mm3) was between the current and never smokers. A similar difference was observed among 925 current, 2,688 former, and 4,721 never-smoking women (7.4, 6.3, and 6.2 × 103 cells/mm3, respectively).

Ishizaka et al. [39] also showed higher WBC counts (6.3 × 103 cells/mm3) among 1,158 current smokers (men and women combined) as compared with the counts in 1,130 former smokers (5.3 × 103 cells/mm3) and 1,399 never smokers (5.1 × 103 cells/mm3). The WBC counts correlated significantly (p < 0.01) with current smoking after logistic regression analysis [40]. Similarly, Al-Awadhi et al. [41] found in a small-scale epidemiology study with 49 smokers (31 men and 18 women) and 43 nonsmokers (24 men and 19 women) that WBC counts were higher in smokers than in nonsmokers (p < 0.05). Lee et al. [42] made a survey of community residents near nuclear power plants. WBC counts were higher for smokers (6.7 × 103 cells/mm3 for 1,054 men and 86 women) than for nonsmokers (6.3 × 103 cells/mm3 for 649 men and 6.1 × 103 cells/mm3 for 1,813 women), although the effect of distance from the plants appeared to be negative (i.e., those who lived closer to the plants had higher WBC counts).

Thus, it appears to be prudent to conclude that smoking induces an increase in WBC counts, and that smoking cessation most probably results in reduction in WBC counts. During the period 1998–2008, for example, the smoking rate among male Japanese population gradually decreasing from 52.8 % in 1998 [43] to 46.8 % in 2003 [44] and 36.8 % in 2008 [44].

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the administration and staff of Kyoto Industrial Health Association for their interest in and support of this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Ward E, Hornung R, Morris J, Rinsky R, Wild D, Halperin W, et al. Risk of low red or white blood cell count related to estimated benzene exposure in a rubber worker cohort (1940–1978) Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:247–257. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199603)29:3&#x0003c;247::AID-AJIM4&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Samoto S, Fukui Y, Ukai H, Okamoto S, Takada S, Ohashi F, et al. Field survey on types of organic solvents used in enterprises of various sizes. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;79:558–567. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0082-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nagasawa Y, Ukai H, Okamoto S, Samoto H, Itoh K, Moriguchi J, et al. Organic solvent use in research institutions in Japan. Ind Health. 2011;49:421–426. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.MS1232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Ordinance for prevention of radiation hazards (enactment in 1922 (Order 41) and final revision in 2011 (Order 152)], 2011.
  • 5.Bain B, Seed M, Godsland I. Normal values for peripheral blood white cell counts in women of four different ethnic origins. J Clin Pathol. 1984;3:188–193. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.2.188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Komiya E. Textbook of clinical hematology. Tokyo: Kokuseido; 1938. p. 132. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.van den Bossche J, Devreese K, Malfait R, van de Vyvere M, Wauters A, Neeis H, et al. Reference intervals for a complete blood count determined on different automated haematology analysers: Abx Pentra 120 Retic, Counter Gen-S, Sysmex SE 9500, Abbott Cell Dyn 4000 and Bayer Advia 120. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002;40:69–73. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2002.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ichihara K. Statistics for bioscience. Nankodo, Tokyo, p. 218–223, 233; 1990 (in Japanese).
  • 9.Kitajima N. Hematology of healthy Japanese with a focus on hemogram. Kumamoto Igakukai Zasshi (J Kumamoto Med Soc) 1928;19:63–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Miyazu Y. Blood picture of health Japanese subjects—part 1. Kumamoto Igakkai Zasshi (J Kumamoto Med Soc) 1943;19:485–524. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Asai T, Kawakita Y, Meren E. Human leukocytes. Saishin Igaku (Modern Med) 1974;29:363–375. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Miyasaka G. Normal blood picture of the Japanese. Nihon Ketsueki Gakkai Zasshi (Acta Haematol Jpn) 1957;720:105–118. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goto K, Yasuno M, Ogura M, Kobayashi Y, Tsukada T, Tango T. Age and sex dependent distribution pattern and normal range of blood cell parameters obtained by automated blood cell analyzer. Rinso Byori. 1993;44:1146–1152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Masai Y. Hematology of healthy Japanese men. Tokyo Igakkai Zasshi (J Tokyo Med Soc) 1914;28:85–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kura G. Clinical significance of findings on leukocytes. Gunnidan Zasshi (J Military Med) 1925;146:965–996. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Maekawa T, Kinugasa K. Hematological studies on the aged. Nihon Ketsueki Gakkai Zasshi (Acta Haematol Jpn) 1957;20:105–118. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Inoue T, Abe S, Hara I, Hibino S, Horiguchi S, Horiuchi K, et al. Physiological values of the blood of the Japanese industrial workers. Sangyo Igaku (Jpn J Ind Health) 1959;1:384–422. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shirakura T, Murai Y, Takeda T, Mori T. Changes of peripheral blood figures and erythropoiesis in the aged. Nihon Ronen Igaku Zasshi (Jpn J Geriatrics) 1978;15:151–157. doi: 10.3143/geriatrics.15.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Okabe H. Characteristics of aged people in clinical biochemistry and hematology. Nihon Ishikai Zasshi (J Jpn Med Assoc) 1995;114:659–664. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shiga S, Koyanagi I, Osaga J, Ichiyama S, Kannagi R. Clinical reference values for laboratory hematology tests calculated using the iterative truncation method with correction: part 2. Reference values for white blood cell (WBC) count, WBC differential including segmented neutrophil, band neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, eosinophil, basophil, platelet count and mean platelet volume. Rinso Byori. 1999;47:281–288. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hasegawa T, Negishi T, Deguchi M. WBC count, atherosclerosis and coronary risk factors. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2002;9:219–223. doi: 10.5551/jat.9.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tatsukawa Y, Hsu WL, Yamada M, Cologne JB, Suzuki G, Yamamoto H, et al. White blood cell count, especially neutrophil count, as a predictor of hypertension in a Japanese population. Hypertens Res. 2008;31:1391–1397. doi: 10.1291/hypres.31.1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Griswold DJ, Champagne VD. Evaluation of the coulter S-Plus IV® three-part differential in an acute care hospital. Am J Clin Pathol. 1985;84:49–57. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/84.1.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bovill EG, Bild DE, Heiss G, Kuller LH, Lee MH, Rock R, et al. White blood cell counts in persons aged 65 years or more from the cardiovascular health study. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143:1109–1115. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.van Oostrom AJHHM, Sijmonsma TP, Rabelink TJ, van Asbeck BS, Castro Cabezas M. Postprandial leukocyte increase in healthy subjects. Metabolism. 2003;52:199–202. doi: 10.1053/meta.2003.50037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Godwin ID, Jencks JA. Normal hematologic values obtained with a coulter, model S. South Med. 1978;71:47–49. doi: 10.1097/00007611-197801000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Barrett AJ, Faille A, Ketels F. Variations in granulocyte colony forming cell numbers in adult blood. Br J Haematol. 1979;42:337–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1979.tb01141.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Galen RS. Predictive value and efficiency of hematology data. Blood Cells. 1980;6:185–197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Giorno R, Clifford JH, Beverly S, Rossing RG. Analysis by different statistical technics and variations with age and sex. Am J Clin Pathol. 1980;74:765–770. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/74.6.765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan. Patient Survey, 1953. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Tokyo; 1955 (in Japanese).
  • 31.Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan. Patient Survey, 1963. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Tokyo; 1965 (in Japanese).
  • 32.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Patient Survey, 2008, Vol. 1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Tokyo; 2010 (in Japanese).
  • 33.Ministry of Education, Japan. School Health Statistics, 1953. Ministry of Finance Printing Bureau, Tokyo; 1954 (in Japanese).
  • 34.Ministry of Education, Japan. School Health Statistics, 1963. Ministry of Finance Printing Bureau, Tokyo; 1964 (in Japanese).
  • 35.Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. School Health Statistics, 2008. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Tokyo; 2009 (in Japanese).
  • 36.Schwartz J, Weiss ST. Cigarette smoking and peripheral blood leukocyte differentials. Ann Epidemiol. 1994;43:236–242. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(94)90102-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Asthana A, Johnson HM, Piper ME, Fiore MC, Baker TB, Stein JH. Effects of smoking intensity and cessation on inflammatory markers in a large cohort of active smokers. Am Heart J. 2010;160:458–463. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Smith MR, Kinmonth A-L, Luben RN, Bingham S, Day NE, Wareham J, et al. Smoking status and differential white cell count in men and women in the EPIC-Norfolk population. Atherosclerosis. 2003;169:331–337. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9150(03)00200-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ishizaka N, Ishizaka Y, Toda E, Nagai R, Yamakado M. Association between cigarette smoking, white blood cell count, and metabolic syndrome as defined by the Japanese criteria. Int Med. 2007;46:1167–1170. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.46.0136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ishizaka N, Ishizaka Y, Toda E, Nagai R, Koike K, Hashimoto H, et al. Relationship between smoking, white blood cell count and metabolic syndrome in Japanese women. Diabet Res Clin Pract. 2007;78:72–76. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Al-Awadhi AM, AlFadhli SM, Mustafa NY, Sharma PN. Effects of cigarette smoking on hematological parameters and von Willebrand factor functional activity levels in asymptomatic male and female Arab smokers. Med Princ Pract. 2008;17:149–153. doi: 10.1159/000112970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee YT, Sung FC, Lin RS, Hsu HC, Chien KL, Yang CY, et al. Peripheral blood cells among community residents living near nuclear power plants. Sci Total Environ. 2001;280:165–172. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00823-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. Smoking and Health Survey, 1998. Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare, Tokyo; 1999 (in Japanese).
  • 44.Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. National Nutrition Survey, 2008. Dai-ichi Shuppann Publishers, Tokyo; 2011 (in Japanese).

Articles from Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Japanese Society for Hygiene

RESOURCES