Skip to main content
Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology logoLink to Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology
. 2012 Jul 25;37(1):143–147. doi: 10.1007/s12639-012-0149-5

Morphometric variations in gametocytes of Hepatozoon canis from naturally infected dogs

Mohamed S M Eljadar 1, L D Singla 1,, Radya A A Mustafa 2, S K Uppal 3
PMCID: PMC3590380  PMID: 24431557

Abstract

This study presents the morphometric characteristic of canine haemoprotozoan, Hepatozoon canis, using software DP2-BSW (OLYMPUS). The gametocytes of H. canis found inside the neutrophils were characteristic in shape and size and varied from 9.50 to 11.80 μm × 5.10–6.00 μm. Parasitaemia ranged from 1.00 to 39.00 %. Few gametocytes without nuclei and of abnormal shapes were also observed. The results were compared with the measurements done by using ocular micrometer.

Keywords: Dogs, Gametocytes, Hepatozoon canis, Morphometry, Parasitaemia

Introduction

Hepatozoon canis is a haemoprotozoan that is transmitted to dogs by the ingestion of the ixodid tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus, containing mature oocysts. This haemogregine was first described in dogs by James in 1905 (Laird 1959). Infections of H. canis are present in southern Europe, Asia, Africa and Latin America (Gondim et al. 1998; O’Dwyer et al. 2001; Criado-Fornelio et al. 2003; Kaur et al. 2011). In infected dogs, gametocytes are present within peripheral blood leukocytes. H. canis infections range from an asymptomatic type to a lethal type in which symptoms such as fever, anaemia, emaciation and debility are displayed. Concurrent infections with pathogens such as Babesia canis and Ehrlichia spp. may aggravate the clinical condition of dogs infected with H. canis (Karagenc et al. 2006). The first report of the size of the gametocyte of H. canis was made by Perak in 1906 in Malaya and he reported its dimensions as 11–12 μm by 4.2–5.2 μm (Laird 1959). Porter (1919) reported that the gametocytes were in the range 8–12 μm by 4.5–6 μm. These measurements were made microscopically using micrometer and measuring a representative number of parasites but, this technique is not regarded as accurate. Warner et al. (1994) used image analysis technology for this purpose and reported its dimensions as 10.66–12.99 μm by 4.74–8.22 μm and proposed that this technique is standard and accurate method as an aid in classification of organisms like H. canis. The present study documents some of the physical size characteristics of H. canis, from a number of naturally infected dogs and is the first report from India about the morphometric measurements of this canine hemoprotozoan.

Materials and methods

Blood samples were collected from the cephalic vein or the recurrent tarsal vein in EDTA coated vials from cases of dogs naturally infected with H. canis presented to small animal clinics of GADVASU Ludhiana (India). Thin blood smears of each blood sample were prepared. The blood smears were stained by the standard Wright Giemsa staining method (Jain 1986). Ten positive cases from the total collection were randomly selected and examined under oil immersion (100×) lens and level of parasitaemia was determined by counting 100 leucocytes (neutrophils) in stained blood smears by the method of Rosenfeld (1947). Comparison of the measurement of the physical size characteristics of H. canis was done by ocular micrometry and software DPZ-BSW (OLYMPUS).

Results

Anorexia, pale mucous membranes, weight loss, pain, diarrhoea, vomiting, gait abnormalities, fever, polyuria, polydipsia and tick infestation were the most common signs observed clinically. Diagnosis of canine hepatozoonosis was made by identifying H. canis gametocytes within leucocytes in stained blood smears. H. canis gametocytes were found as capsular structures in cytoplasm of the neutrophils (Figs. 1, 2). 1–39 % (7.70 ± 3.77 %) neutrophils were found infected in different cases. Some parasites were seen without nucleus (Fig. 2) even gametocytes outside the neutrophils were also observed inside the smears (Fig. 3). The average parasitized neutrophils were 813.10 ± 468.97 μl−1 with a variation from 14 to 4,913 μl−1 in different cases. The measurements of gametocyte of H. canis inside neutrophils varied from 10.26 to 11.21 μm × 5.23–5.80 μm when done by ocular micrometer (Table 1). Micrometry done by using software DP2-BSW (OLYMPUS) (Fig. 4) showed almost similar values regarding size of H. canis as shown by ocular micrometry (Fig. 5) and measurements varied from 9.50 to 11.80 μm × 5.10–6.00 μm (Table 2). Even abnormal shapes of gametocytes were observed (Fig. 6).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

H. canis gametocyte with nucleus in cytoplasm of the neutrophils

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

H. canis gametocyte without nucleus in cytoplasm of the neutrophils

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

H. canis gametocyte outside neutrophil (arrow)

Table 1.

Ocular micrometric measurements and parasitaemia of Hepatozoon canis infection in neutrophils of infected dogs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Length, mean ± SE (range) 10.93 ± 0.16 (10–12) 10.81 ± 0.17 (10–12) 10.77 ± 0.32 (9–12) 11.02 ± 0.16 (11–12) 11.08 ± 0.32 (11–12) 11.21 ± 0.19 (10–12) 10.93 ± 0.27 (10–12) 10.26 ± 0.36 (10–11) 10.69 ± 0.24 (10–12) 10.83 ± 0.23 (10–12)
Breadth, mean ± SE (range) 5.32 ± 0.16 (5–6) 5.46 ± 0.16 (5–6) 5.38 ± 0.32 (5–6) 5.80 ± 0.22 (5–7) 5.70 ± 0.00 (6) 5.66 ± 0.27 (5–6) 5.70 ± 0.00 (6) 5.32 ± 0.23 (5–6) 5.23 ± 0.27 (5–6) 5.46 ± 0.24 (5–6)

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Gametocytic measurement by software DP2-BSW—OLYMPUS

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Gametocytic measurement by ocular micrometer

Table 2.

Morphometric observations of Hepatozoon canis in dogs as confirmed by software DP2-BSW (OLYMPUS)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Length, mean ± SE 11.60 ± 0.08 10.10 ± 0.25 10.90 ± 0.84 11.40 ± 0.17 11.70 ± 0.11 11.80 ± 0.42 11.80 ± 0.09 9.50 ± 0.08 11.60 ± 0.08 11.40 ± 0.19
Breadth, mean ± SE 5.50 ± 0.09 5.10 ± 0.28 6.00 ± 0.17 5.30 ± 0.28 5.20 ± 0.09 5.30 ± 0.19 5.20 ± 0.05 5.50 ± 0.18 5.50 ± 0.09 5.30 ± 0.20

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Abnormal shaped gametocytes (Laogenze shaped)

Discussion

Though H. canis in a dog in Punjab was reported by Kalra et al. (1989), no previous studies from India have reported the morphometric characteristics till date. In blood smears, levels of parasitaemia ranged from 1 to 39 %. Levels of H. canis parasitaemia observed by previous researchers ranged from as low as 0.5 % (Gondim et al. 1998) and as high as 90 % (Baneth et al. 1995). Elias and Homans (1988) found 6–43 % of the circulating neutrophils to be infected. Vincent-Johnson et al. (1997) reported that the number of infected leukocytes in American hepatozoonosis did not exceed 0.1 %. The disease severity was greater in dogs with high parasitaemia which is in concurrence with the findings of Baneth and Weigler (1997). The gametocytic measurements have been done by various researchers using simple microscopic techniques (Laird 1959; Soulsby 1968). Porter reported in 1919 that the gametocytes were in the range of 8–12 μm by 4.5–6 μm (Laird 1959). Soulsby (1968) states that gametocytes measure 6 μm × 3 μm. In the present case measurements of H. canis using software varied from 9.50 to 11.80 μm × 5.10–6.00 μm, which was compared well with the measurements done by using ocular micrometer (10.26–11.21 μm × 5.23–5.80). The gametocytic measurement of H. canis can be regarded as accurate and definitive owing to the software used (DP2-BSW—OLYMPUS), further more the chances of error are minimized to a greater extent, when compared with ocular micrometry. This software used requires less time to execute the work and does not involve the requirement of a bird’s eye when compared with ocular micrometry, which is cumbersome and more error prone.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the authorities of Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (Ludhiana, India) for providing necessary facilities.

References

  1. Baneth G, Weigler B. Retrospective case-control study of hepatozoonosis in dogs in Israel. J Vet Int Med. 1997;11:365–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.1997.tb00482.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baneth G, Harmelin A, Presentey BZ. Hepatozoon canis infection in two dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1995;206:1891–1894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Criado-Fornelio A, Martinez-Marcos A, Buling-Sarana A, Barba-Carretero JC. Molecular studies on Babesia, Theileria and Hepatozoon in southern Europe Part II. Phylogenetic analysis and evolutionary history. Vet Parasitol. 2003;114:173–194. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(03)00141-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Elias E, Homans PA. Hepatozoon canis infection in dogs: clinical and haematological findings treatment. J Small Anim Pract. 1988;29:55–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1988.tb02264.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gondim LFP, Kohayagawa A, Alencar X, Biondo AW, Takahira RK, Franco SRV. Canine hepatozoonosis in Brazil: description of eight naturally occurring cases. Vet Parasitol. 1998;74:319–323. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(96)01120-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jain NC (ed) (1986) Schalm’s veterinary hematology. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 41–43, 71–72, 993–996
  7. Kalra IS, Gupta MP, Kwatra MS. Hepatozoon canis infection in a dog: a case report. Indian J Vet Med. 1989;9:117–118. [Google Scholar]
  8. Karagenc TI, Pasa S, Kirli G, Hosgor M, Bilgic HB, Ozon YH, Atasoy A, Eren H. A parasitological, molecular and serological survey of Hepatozoon canis infection in dogs around the Aegean coast of Turkey. Vet Parasitol. 2006;135:113–119. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaur P, Deshmukh S, Rajsukhbir Singh, Bansal BK, Randhawa CS, Singla LD. Para-clinico-pathological observations of insidious incidence of canine hepatozoonosis from a mongrel dog: a case report. J Parasit Dis. 2011;36:135–138. doi: 10.1007/s12639-011-0092-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Laird M. Malayan protozoa 2. Hepatozoon miller (sporozoa: coccidia), with an unusual host record for H. canis (James) J Protozool. 1959;6:316–319. [Google Scholar]
  11. O’Dwyer LH, Massard CL, Pereira de Souza JC. Hepatozoon canis infection associated with dog ticks of rural areas of Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2001;94:143–150. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00378-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Porter A. Leucocytogregarines, and their occurrence in South Africa. S Afr J Sci. 1919;15:335–336. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rosenfeld G. Corante pancrômico para hematologia e citologia; nova combinação dos componentes do May–Grünwald e do Giensa nun só corante de emprego rápido. Mem Inst Butantan. 1947;20:329–334. [Google Scholar]
  14. Soulsby EJL (1968) Helminths, arthropods and protozoa of domestic animals (6 edition of Monnig’s veterinary helminthology and entomology). Bailliere Tindall and Casell, London
  15. Vincent-Johnson NA, Macintire DK, Lindsay DS, Lenz SD, Baneth G, Shkap V, Blagburn BL. A new Hepatozoon species from dogs: description of the causative agent of canine hepatozoonosis in North America. J Parasitol. 1997;83:1165–1672. doi: 10.2307/3284379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Warner T, Baneth G, Zuckerman A, Nyska A. Hepatozoan canis: size measurement of the gametocyte using image analysis. Comp Heamatol Int. 1994;4:177–179. doi: 10.1007/BF00798361. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Parasitic Diseases: Official Organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES