Dear Sirs,
The hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs) are a genetically heterogeneous group of disorders characterised by progressive corticospinal tract degeneration and the development of lower limb spasticity [1, 2]. Autosomal-dominant HSP is the most commonly inherited form of the disease and in this group, SPG4 mutations account for ~40 % of cases [1]. The SPG4 gene codes for spastin, a critical neuronal protein that maintains organelle axonal transport by severing and rearranging the microtubule network [3, 4]. Dysfunctional mutant proteins or insufficient quantities of the wild-type protein inhibit this dynamic shuttling process resulting in axonal swelling and progressive retrograde degeneration that preferentially affects the long corticospinal axons [3, 4].
There is mounting evidence that the microtubule and mitochondrial networks are intrinsically linked at the cellular level [5]. This intriguing association has recently been highlighted by the clinical observation that autosomal-dominant optic atrophy (DOA)—a classical mitochondrial optic neuropathy caused by pathogenic OPA1 mutations—can result in complicated neurological phenotypes (DOA+) with features indistinguishable from HSP [6]. Furthermore, subclinical corticospinal tract dysfunction also seems to be a prevalent feature among OPA1 mutation carriers presenting with isolated visual failure, suggesting a wider disease spectrum than originally considered [7]. Interestingly, these overlapping genotype-phenotype manifestations have been reported previously in families with a rarer, autosomal-recessive form of HSP caused by pathogenic SPG7 mutations, in which bilateral optic atrophy was a prominent feature segregating with spastic paraplegia [8–10]. Given the emerging disease mechanisms linking corticospinal tract dysfunction with optic nerve degeneration, the aim of this study was to determine the neurological and ophthalmological manifestations of SPG4-related HSP, looking specifically for evidence of clinical or subclinical optic neuropathy among affected patients. The overall neurological disability, including cognitive function, was also evaluated to provide a comprehensive assessment of the burden of disease in this group of patients.
A comprehensive neurological (GP, RH, PFC) and ophthalmological (PYWM) assessment (Supplementary Method) was carried out on ten white patients from the North of England harbouring confirmed pathogenic SPG4 mutations (Table 1). A broad spectrum of neurological disability was observed among affected patients with scores ranging from one to nine on the modified EDSS scale (Table 2). Importantly, four patients had abnormal MOCA scores of less than 26 points. Seven patients performed poorly on the memory component of the MOCA test protocol and one patient had abnormal visuospatial/executive performance. The association between SPG4 mutations and progressive cognitive decline remains controversial [11–13] and our study of a well-characterised patient cohort provides further evidence favouring a true causal link. Two of the patients with abnormal MOCA scores were younger than the age of 30 years, clearly highlighting the need for clinical vigilance to detect early signs of cognitive impairment and to provide adequate level of support, especially to carers.
Table 1.
Molecular genetic and ophthalmological features of the SPG4 patient cohort
| Patient | Sex | Age (years) | SPG4 mutation | BCVA RE-LE | Optic discs/OCT measurements | Eye movements | Visual electrophysiology | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exon | cDNA change/consequence | |||||||
| 1 | F | 31 | 5 | c.743C>G/p.S245X | 20/20-20/20 | Normal/no RNFL thinning | Normal | Normal |
| 2 | M | 53 | 5 | c.743C>G/p.S245X | 20/20-20/20 | Normal/no RNFL thinning | Horizontal SWJ/saccadic pursuit | Normal |
| 3 | F | 50 | 6 | c.937delG/p.D313fsX1 | 20/20-20/20 | Normal/no RNFL thinning | Normal | Normal |
| 4 | F | 55 | 4–17 | del exon 4-17/large-scale deletion | 20/20-20/20 | Normal/no RNFL thinning | Normal | Normal |
| 5 | F | 29 | 10 | c.1253_1255delAAG/p.E418fsX198 | 20/20-20/20 | Normal/no RNFL thinning | Horizontal SWJ/saccadic pursuit | Normal |
| 6 | F | 25 | 11 | c.1442_1443insA/p.V482fsX5 | 20/20-20/20 | Normal/no RNFL thinning | Normal | Normal |
| 7 | F | 55 | 11 | c.1442_1443insA/p.V482fsX5 | 20/20-20/20 | Normal/no RNFL thinning | Horizontal SWJ/saccadic pursuit | Normal |
| 8 | F | 49 | 11 | c.1414G>A/p.V472I | 20/20-20/20 | Normal/no RNFL thinning | Normal | Normal |
| 9 | F | 72 | 11 | c.1384A>G/p.K462E | 20/60-20/30 | Normal/no RNFL thinning | Normal | Normal |
| 10 | M | 65 | 11 | c.1081C>A; c.1082T>A/p.L361N | 20/20-20/20 | Normal/no RNFL thinning | Normal | Normal |
BCVA best-corrected visual acuities, cDNA complementary DNA, LE left eye, OCT optical coherence tomography, RE right eye, RNFL retinal nerve fibre layer, SWJ square wave jerks
Table 2.
Neurological and cognitive features of the SPG4 patient cohort
| Patient | Cognitive assessment (MOCA) | Motor examination | Vibration sense | Other findings | Disability measurements | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modified Ashworth spasticity score | Deep tendon reflexes | Power (MRC scale) | Coordination | ||||||||||||||
| Score | Comments | L/R E | L/R K | L/R BR | L/R B | L/R T | L/R P | L/R A | PR | UL ex/fl | LL fl/ex | 10 m walk | Modified EDSS | ||||
| 1 | 27/30 | 3 points from memory | 0, 0 | 3, 3 | 3, 3 | 3, 3 | 3, 3 | 4, 4 | 2, 2 | Ex | 5, 5 | 4, 5 | AT | Ankles | 19.1 s | 6.5 | |
| 2 | 27/30 | 4 points from memory | 0, 0 | 1, 1 | 2, 2 | 2, 2 | 2, 2 | 3, 3 | 2, 2 | Fl | 5, 5 | 5, 5 | N | N | 8.2 s | 1 | |
| 3 | 27/30 | 2 points each from visuospatial/executive and attention | 0, 0 | 1, 1 | 2, 2 | 2, 2 | 2, 2 | 3, 3 | 2, 2 | Ex | 5, 5 | 4, 4 | N | Knees | 10.1 s | 2 | |
| 4 | 27/30 | 3 points from memory | 0, 0 | 2, 2 | 3, 3 | 3, 3 | 2, 2 | 3, 3 | 2, 2 | Ex | 5, 5 | 4, 3–4 | N | Knees | Marked LL oedema | WC | 7 |
| 5 | 23/30 | 3 points from memory | 3, 3 | 4, 4 | 3, 3 | 3, 3 | 3, 3 | 3, 3 | 4, 4 | Ex | 4, 4 | 0, 0 | N | Knees | Spastic dysarthria | WC | 9 |
| 6 | 25/30 | 3 points from memory | 0, 0 | 1, 1 | 2, 2 | 2, 2 | 2, 2 | 3, 3 | 3, 3 | Fl | 5, 5 | 5, 5 | N | N | 8.9 s | 1 | |
| 7 | 25/30 | 5 points from memory | 0, 0 | 3, 3 | 2, 2 | 3, 3 | 3, 3 | 4, 4 | 3, 3 | Ex | 5, 5 | 4, 5 | N | Ankles | 13.4 s | 4 | |
| 8 | 29/30 | 0, 0 | 3, 3 | 2, 2 | 2, 2 | 2, 2 | 4, 4 | 4, 4 | Ex | 5, 5 | 4, 4 | N | N | 11.3 s | 2 | ||
| 10 | 25/30 | 4 points from memory | 1, 1 | 2, 2 | 2, 2 | 2, 2 | 2, 2 | 3, 3 | 3, 3 | Ex | 5, 5 | 4, 4 | N | Ankles | Two canes needed for walking | 36.6 s | 6.5 |
Patient nine was not available for this portion of the assessment. A total MOCA score of 26 or higher is considered normal. For subjects with 12 years of total education or less, an additional point is added. MOCA scores lower than 26 are suggestive of cognitive impairment [14]. Vibration sense has been reported as the lowest normal testing location. Published normative range for the 10 m walk test protocol: mean 6.7 s, 95 % confidence interval 5.6–7.9 s [15]
A Achilles, AT action tremor, B biceps, BR brachioradialis, E elbow, EDSS Expanded Disability Status Scale, Ex extensor, Fl flexor, K knee, L left, LL lower limbs, m metres, MOCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale, MRC Medical Research Council, N normal, PR plantar responses, R right, s seconds, T triceps, UL upper limbs, WC wheelchair-bound
Except for one patient who had bilateral nuclear sclerotic cataracts, all patients had best-corrected visual acuities of 20/20 bilaterally (Table 1). The ophthalmological examination was normal with full colour discrimination and no detectable optic disc or retinal abnormalities. Visual fields, RNFL thickness measurements and visual electrophysiology were within the normal range for the entire HSP patient cohort. Three patients had abnormal eye movements with horizontal square wave jerks and saccadic smooth pursuits. No significant ptosis or limitation of eye movements was noted on orthoptic assessment. Based on our comprehensive clinical and electrophysiological evaluation, visual loss secondary to optic nerve or retinal degeneration is unlikely to be a major phenotypic manifestation of SPG4-related disease. Affected patients and at-risk family members can therefore be reassured that unlike other genetically-determined forms of HSP [6–10], SPG4 mutations are not associated with the development of significant ophthalmological complications, in particular visual failure.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a research grant from the Association of British Neurologists (ABN, UK). GP is the recipient of a Bisby Fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. RH is supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC, UK). PFC is a Wellcome Trust Senior Fellow in Clinical Science and a UK National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator who also receives funding from the MRC (UK), and the UK NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Ageing and Age-related disease award to the Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. PYWM is an MRC (UK) Clinician Scientist.
Conflicts of interest
All the listed authors in this manuscript report no relevant financial disclosures or conflicts of interest.
Ethical standard
This study had the relevant institutional ethical approval and it was carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Footnotes
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-8008-9.
References
- 1.Salinas S, Proukakis C, Crosby A, Warner TT. Hereditary spastic paraplegia: clinical features and pathogenetic mechanisms. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:1127–1138. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70258-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Harding AE. Classification of the hereditary ataxias and paraplegias. Lancet. 1983;1:1151–1155. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)92879-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McDermott CJ, Grierson AJ, Wood JD, et al. Hereditary spastic paraparesis: disrupted intracellular transport associated with spastin mutation. Ann Neurol. 2003;54:748–759. doi: 10.1002/ana.10757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lumb JH, Connell JW, Allison R, Reid E. The AAA ATPase spastin links microtubule severing to membrane modelling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823:192–197. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schon EA, Przedborski S. Mitochondria: the next (Neurode) generation. Neuron. 2011;70:1033–1053. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yu-Wai-Man P, Griffiths PG, Gorman GS, et al. Multi-system neurological disease is common in patients with OPA1 mutations. Brain. 2010;133:771–786. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baker MR, Fisher KM, Whittaker RG, Griffiths PG, Yu-Wai-Man P, Chinnery PF. Subclinical multisystem neurologic disease in “pure” Opa1 autosomal dominant optic atrophy. Neurology. 2011;77:1309–1312. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318230a15a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Casari G, De Fusco M, Ciarmatori S, et al. Spastic paraplegia and OXPHOS impairment caused by mutations in paraplegin, a nuclear-encoded mitochondrial metalloprotease. Cell. 1998;93:973–983. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81203-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wilkinson PA, Crosby AH, Turner C, et al. A clinical, genetic and biochemical study of SPG7 mutations in hereditary spastic paraplegia. Brain. 2004;127:973–980. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.van Gassen KL, van der Heijden CD, de Bot ST, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlations in spastic paraplegia type 7: a study in a large Dutch cohort. Brain. 2012;135:2994–3004. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tallaksen CME, Guichart-Gomez E, Verpillat P, et al. Subtle cognitive impairment but no dementia in patients with spastin mutations. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:1113–1118. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McMonagle P, Byrne P, Hutchinson M. Further evidence of dementia in SPG4-linked autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia. Neurology. 2004;62:407–410. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000108629.04434.05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Murphy S, Gorman G, Beetz C, et al. Dementia in SPG4 hereditary spastic paraplegia Clinical, genetic, and neuropathologic evidence. Neurology. 2009;73:378–384. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b04c6c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:695–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Watson M. Refining the ten-metre walking test for use with neurologically impaired people. Physiotherapy. 2002;88:386–397. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61264-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
