Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2013 Mar;87(6):3583–3586. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03029-12

The Receptor-Binding Site of the Measles Virus Hemagglutinin Protein Itself Constitutes a Conserved Neutralizing Epitope

Maino Tahara a,, Shinji Ohno b, Kouji Sakai a, Yuri Ito c, Hideo Fukuhara c, Katsuhiro Komase a, Melinda A Brindley d, Paul A Rota e, Richard K Plemper d, Katsumi Maenaka c, Makoto Takeda a
PMCID: PMC3592127  PMID: 23283964

Abstract

Here, we provide direct evidence that the receptor-binding site of measles virus (MV) hemagglutinin protein itself forms an effective conserved neutralizing epitope (CNE). Several receptor-interacting residues constitute the CNE. Thus, viral escape from neutralization has to be associated with loss of receptor-binding activity. Since interactions with both the signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM) and nectin4 are critical for MV pathogenesis, its escape, which results from loss of receptor-binding activity, should not occur in nature.

TEXT

Measles virus (MV) is an enveloped virus that belongs to the genus Morbillivirus of the family Paramyxoviridae and possesses two types of surface glycoprotein spikes, the hemagglutinin (H) and fusion (F) proteins. MV infection is initiated by binding of the H protein to cellular receptors on the target host cells. The binding triggers membrane fusion between the virus envelope and the host cell plasma membrane mediated by the F protein. The signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM) on a subset of immune cells and nectin4 at adherens junctions are the principal receptors for MV (14). The H and F proteins are both neutralizing targets, but greater amounts of antibodies (Abs) are elicited against the H protein than the F protein, and the H protein-specific antibodies mainly contribute to neutralization of MV infection in vivo (58). All the available data suggest that measles eradication is biologically feasible (9, 10), and one of the major factors that would ensure measles eradication is the single-serotype nature of MV. Our previous paper suggested that the receptor-binding site (RBS) on the H protein, which is exposed outside the heavy N-glycan shields, may constitute a major neutralizing epitope that contributes to the single-serotype nature of MV (11). However, our recent paper (12) showing the detailed locations of five epitopes (I, II, iv, v, and vi) on the H protein provided insufficient evidence that the RBS acts as a neutralizing epitope. Here, we provide direct and concrete evidence that the RBS itself forms an effective conserved neutralizing epitope (CNE) which provides a strong functional constraint against change.

In the present study, we characterized a new mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb), 2F4. MAb 2F4 was produced using a cell line expressing the H protein of the wild-type IC-B strain as an antigen. For competitive binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (cELISAs), MV antigens precoated on cELISA plates (Denka Seiken) were incubated with previously reported MAbs (E81, E128, E185, E39, and E103) (12, 13), 2F4, or phosphate-buffered saline for 1 h and then incubated with MAb 2F4 labeled with biotin using a biotin labeling kit (NH2; Dojindo Laboratories). After three washes, the MV antigens bound by the MAbs were incubated with a streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate (Thermo Scientific) for 1 h before addition of the TMB substrate (3,3′5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine; Denka Seiken). The plates were incubated for 25 min, and the colorimetric reactions were stopped by addition of H2SO4. The optical density (OD) values were analyzed using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad). The data revealed that binding of 2F4 was not inhibited by MAbs recognizing epitopes I, iv, v, and vi (E81, E185, E39, and E103, respectively) (12) (Table 1; the epitope recognized by 2F4 is tentatively termed epitope vii). On the other hand, E128 recognizing epitope II (12) showed partial inhibition of 2F4 binding (Table 1). Epitope II is shielded by the N-glycan modification at amino acid position 416 (N416-sugar), and viruses with the N416-sugar (genotypes D3, D4, D5, and D9 among the eight genotypes) are not neutralized by E128 (12). Eight distinct recombinant MVs (rMVs) encoding a Renilla luciferase reporter gene and an H gene derived from different MV genotypes (A, B3, D3, D4, D5, D8, D9, and H1) were used as neutralization targets for 2F4 (Table 2), as reported previously (12). The data clearly demonstrated that, unlike E128 recognizing epitope II, 2F4 showed high neutralizing titers against all eight rMVs (Table 2). These data suggested that epitope vii is a CNE and is distinct from all the other five epitopes (I, II, iv, v, and vi).

Table 1.

Summary of competitive binding ELISAs of anti-H protein MAbs

Unlabeled MAb Antigenic site Biotinylated MAb 2F4 (vii) inhibitiona
E81 I
E128 II +
E185 iv
E39 v
E103 vi
2F4 vii ++
a

++, complete inhibition; +, partial inhibition; −, no inhibition.

Table 2.

Neutralizing titers against MV strains possessing H genes from different genotypes

Cell line Genotype, yr isolated Neutralizing titera
2F4 (vii) E128 (II)b
B95a A, 1954 22,141 1,968
B3, 2009 11,070 1,968
D3, 1984 22,141 15
D4, 2009 22,141 31
D5, 2001 11,070 15
D8, 2009 44,281 1,968
D9, 2010 11,070 15
H1, 2009 22,141 1,968
II-18 A, 1954 11,070 62,977
B3, 2009 11,070 62,977
D3, 1984 11,070 123
D4, 2009 11,070 31
D5, 2001 22,141 <4
D8, 2009 22,141 62,977
D9, 2010 11,070 123
H1, 2009 22,141 62,977
a

Data represent neutralizing titers for 1 mg/ml of immunoglobulin.

b

Data for E128 are taken from reference 12.

When the H protein-SLAM interaction was assessed by surface plasmon resonance assays, as reported previously (12), MAb 2F4 blocked binding of the H protein to SLAM, as did MAbs B5 and E128 recognizing epitopes I and II, which are located near the RBS (12) (Table 3). These data suggest that epitope vii is located at or near the RBS. A panel of rMVs possessing amino acid substitutions at the RBS were analyzed for neutralization by 2F4. On the D3 genetic background (IC323 strain [14]), four rMVs encoding enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and possessing mutations at a SLAM-interacting residue (R533A) (Fig. 1B) and nectin4-interacting residues (F483A, Y543S, and S544A/Y541S) (Fig. 1C) (1519) were generated and assessed for virus spreading in SLAM-positive (SLAM+) B95a and nectin4+ II-18 cells (20) in the presence or absence of 2F4 (Fig. 2). The rMVs with F483A and Y543S were reported previously (15). As shown in Fig. 2, in the absence of 2F4 [Ab(−)], wild-type MV spread efficiently in both cell types using SLAM or nectin4. On the other hand, rMVs with F483A, Y543S, or S544A/Y541S lost the ability to use nectin4 as a receptor and thus failed to spread in II-18 cells, even in the absence of 2F4. Similarly, rMV with R533A lost the ability to use SLAM as a receptor and did not spread in B95a cells. However, in the presence of 2F4, the mutant MVs showed advantages for spreading. Even in the presence of 2F4, rMVs with F483A, Y543S, or S544A/Y541S were able to spread in SLAM+ B95a cells, and rMV with R533 was able to spread in nectin4+ II-18 cells, whereas the wild-type MV infection was completely neutralized by 2F4. Similar experiments were performed using luciferase-expressing rMVs (21). Two rMVs with mutations at SLAM-interacting residues (D505S and R533A) (17, 19) (Fig. 1B) and two rMVs with mutations at nectin4-interacting residues (F483A and Y543S) (15, 16, 18) (Fig. 1C) were generated (rMVs with F483A and Y543S were reported previously [15]). In part, as reported previously, rMVs with F483A (15) and Y543S (15) were unable to bind to nectin4 (2, 3), and those with R533A (16) and D505S (in the present study) lost the ability to use SLAM (Table 4). Meanwhile, the F483A, Y543S, D505S, and R533A substitutions all resulted in escape from neutralization by 2F4 (Table 4). These data demonstrated that the RBS used for interactions with both SLAM and nectin4 constitutes epitope vii recognized by 2F4 (Fig. 1). Consequently, MV escape from neutralization by 2F4 is penalized by loss of affinity for one of the principal MV receptors.

Table 3.

Competitive binding of anti-H protein MAbs against SLAMa

MAb Antigenic site Competitive activityb
2F4 vii ++
B5 I ++
E128 II ++
E103 vi
a

The detailed procedure has been previously reported (12).

b

++, complete inhibition; −, no inhibition.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Location of epitope vii on the H protein tetrameric structure. (A) Diagram of an H protein tetramer (a dimer of H protein dimers). The four H protein molecules are shown in dark gray, light gray, dark purple, and light purple. (B) Location of SLAM-interacting residues, which constitute epitope vii on the tetrameric H protein structure in complex with SLAM (19). SLAM is shown in translucent cyan. SLAM interacting with the gray H protein is deleted in the structure shown at the bottom. A detailed view in a ribbon and stick diagram is shown in the box. SLAM is shown in cyan, and H protein is shown in orange or yellow. (C) Location of nectin4-interacting residues, which constitute epitope vii. The tetrameric structure was reconstructed using data by Hashiguchi et al. (19) and Zhang et al. (18). Nectin4 is shown in translucent magenta. Nectin4 interacting with the gray H protein is deleted in the structure shown at the bottom. A detailed view in a ribbon and stick diagram is shown in the box. Nectin4 is shown in magenta, and H protein is shown in orange or yellow. (B and C) The figures were produced using PyMOL (Schrödinger; http://www.pymol.org). The amino acid residues demonstrated or suggested to constitute portions of epitopes are shown in colors as follows: residues on beta-sheets 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 (19) are shown in blue, dark green, light green, yellow, orange, and red, respectively.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Effects of specific substitutions on virus infectivity and MAb neutralization. EGFP autofluorescence in MV-infected SLAM+ B95a cells and nectin4+ II-18 cells is shown. B95a and II-18 cells were infected with rMVs containing F483A, Y543S, S544A/Y541S, and R533A substitutions in the presence or absence of MAb 2F4. The panels show representative images observed using a fluorescence microscope.

Table 4.

Neutralizing titers against recombinant MVs possessing the IC-H protein with various amino acid substitutions

Cell line Mutation Infectivity Neutralizing titera
B5 (I) E81 (I) E103 (vi) 2F4 (vii)
B95a Wild type (−) + 7,536 1,727 10,231 22,141
F483A + 3,768 1,727 10,231 <346
Y543S + 1,884 1,727 2,558 692
D505S NA NA NA NA
R533A NA NA NA NA
II-18 Wild type (−) + 3,764 27,631 20,462 11,070
F483A NA NA NA NA
Y543A NA NA NA NA
D505S + 1,884 13,815 20,462 <5
R533A + 1,884 27,631 20,462 173
a

Data represent neutralizing titers for 1 mg/ml of immunoglobulin. NA, not applicable.

Apparently, a previously reported MAb, I-41, also recognizes this vii epitope (22), since a substitution at position 552 (the phenylalanine at this position is predicted to interact with SLAM [19]) allowed MV to escape from neutralization. Another previous study implied that MAb 80-II-B2 recognizes a region containing residues 505 and 506 within this epitope (23). The H protein of the CAM-70 MV vaccine strain features a mutation at position 505. Accordingly, the CAM-70 vaccine strain does not react with 80-II-B2 and binds to SLAM inefficiently (23, 24). Previous competitive binding studies revealed that MAb 16-DE6 recognizes the same antigenic site as I-41 (25), and that an 16-DE6 escape mutant contained, among other changes, an arginine-to-glycine substitution at position 533 (R533G) (22). Previously characterized MAbs B2 and BH26 similarly recognize this epitope (6, 25, 26), which appears to be a premier neutralizing epitope for the H protein. Residues located in this epitope may be involved in SLAM-binding activity (6, 26). Therefore, this region probably corresponds to epitope vii identified in our study.

In summary, the present data demonstrate that both the SLAM- and nectin4-interacting residues themselves constitute a CNE. Since these residues are critical for interaction with either SLAM or nectin4, viral escape from neutralization has to be associated with loss of the receptor-binding activity. Since efficient MV spreading mandates interactions of the H protein with these two discrete proteinaceous receptors, SLAM and nectin4 (4), residues within this domain are likely to be under high selective pressure to maintain their molecular identity, and contribute to the sustainability of the single-serotype nature of MV.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank T.A. Sato, Y. Yanagi, and T. Seya for providing MAbs, N. Ito and M. Sugiyama for providing BHK/T7-9 cells, and K. Taira for providing an MV isolate. We also thank all the members of Department of Virology 3, NIID, Japan, for technical support.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print 2 January 2013

REFERENCES

  • 1. Tatsuo H, Ono N, Tanaka K, Yanagi Y. 2000. SLAM (CDw150) is a cellular receptor for measles virus. Nature 406:893–897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Noyce RS, Bondre DG, Ha MN, Lin LT, Sisson G, Tsao MS, Richardson CD. 2011. Tumor cell marker PVRL4 (nectin 4) is an epithelial cell receptor for measles virus. PLoS Pathog. 7:e1002240 doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mühlebach MD, Mateo M, Sinn PL, Prufer S, Uhlig KM, Leonard VH, Navaratnarajah CK, Frenzke M, Wong XX, Sawatsky B, Ramachandran S, McCray PB, Jr, Cichutek K, von Messling V, Lopez M, Cattaneo R. 2011. Adherens junction protein nectin-4 is the epithelial receptor for measles virus. Nature 480:530–533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Takeda M, Tahara M, Nagata N, Seki F. 2011. Wild-type measles virus is intrinsically dual-tropic. Front. Microbiol. 2:279 doi:10.3389/fmicb.2011.00279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. de Swart RL, Yuksel S, Osterhaus AD. 2005. Relative contributions of measles virus hemagglutinin- and fusion protein-specific serum antibodies to virus neutralization. J. Virol. 79:11547–11551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bouche FB, Ertl OT, Muller CP. 2002. Neutralizing B cell response in measles. Viral Immunol. 15:451–471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. de Swart RL, Yuksel S, Langerijs CN, Muller CP, Osterhaus AD. 2009. Depletion of measles virus glycoprotein-specific antibodies from human sera reveals genotype-specific neutralizing antibodies. J. Gen. Virol. 90:2982–2989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Duke T, Mgone CS. 2003. Measles: not just another viral exanthem. Lancet 361:763–773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Sanders R, Dabbagh A, Featherstone D. 2011. Risk analysis for measles reintroduction after global certification of eradication. J. Infect. Dis. 204(Suppl 1):S71–S77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Bellini WJ, Rota PA. 2011. Biological feasibility of measles eradication. Virus Res. 162:72–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hashiguchi T, Kajikawa M, Maita N, Takeda M, Kuroki K, Sasaki K, Kohda D, Yanagi Y, Maenaka K. 2007. Crystal structure of measles virus hemagglutinin provides insight into effective vaccines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:19535–19540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Tahara M, Ito Y, Brindley MA, Ma X, He J, Xu S, Fukuhara H, Sakai K, Komase K, Rota PA, Plemper RK, Maenaka K, Takeda M. 2013. Functional and structural characterization of neutralizing epitopes of measles virus hemagglutinin protein. J. Virol. 87:666–675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sato TA, Fukuda A, Sugiura A. 1985. Characterization of major structural proteins of measles virus with monoclonal antibodies. J. Gen. Virol. 66(Pt 7):1397–1409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Takeda M, Takeuchi K, Miyajima N, Kobune F, Ami Y, Nagata N, Suzaki Y, Nagai Y, Tashiro M. 2000. Recovery of pathogenic measles virus from cloned cDNA. J. Virol. 74:6643–6647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Tahara M, Takeda M, Shirogane Y, Hashiguchi T, Ohno S, Yanagi Y. 2008. Measles virus infects both polarized epithelial and immune cells by using distinctive receptor-binding sites on its hemagglutinin. J. Virol. 82:4630–4637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Leonard VH, Sinn PL, Hodge G, Miest T, Devaux P, Oezguen N, Braun W, McCray PB, McChesney MB, Cattaneo R. 2008. Measles virus blind to its epithelial cell receptor remains virulent in rhesus monkeys but cannot cross the airway epithelium and is not shed. J. Clin. Invest. 118:2448–2458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Vongpunsawad S, Oezgun N, Braun W, Cattaneo R. 2004. Selectively receptor-blind measles viruses: identification of residues necessary for SLAM- or CD46-induced fusion and their localization on a new hemagglutinin structural model. J. Virol. 78:302–313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhang X, Lu G, Qi J, Li Y, He Y, Xu X, Shi J, Zhang C, Yan J, Gao GF. 2013. Structure of measles virus hemagglutinin bound to its epithelial receptor nectin-4. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20:67–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hashiguchi T, Ose T, Kubota M, Maita N, Kamishikiryo J, Maenaka K, Yanagi Y. 2011. Structure of the measles virus hemagglutinin bound to its cellular receptor SLAM. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18:135–141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Shirogane Y, Takeda M, Tahara M, Ikegame S, Nakamura T, Yanagi Y. 2010. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition abolishes the susceptibility of polarized epithelial cell lines to measles virus. J. Biol. Chem. 285:20882–20890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Takeda M, Ohno S, Tahara M, Takeuchi H, Shirogane Y, Ohmura H, Nakamura T, Yanagi Y. 2008. Measles viruses possessing the polymerase protein genes of the Edmonston vaccine strain exhibit attenuated gene expression and growth in cultured cells and SLAM knock-in mice. J. Virol. 82:11979–11984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hu A, Sheshberadaran H, Norrby E, Kovamees J. 1993. Molecular characterization of epitopes on the measles virus hemagglutinin protein. Virology 192:351–354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hummel KB, Bellini WJ. 1995. Localization of monoclonal antibody epitopes and functional domains in the hemagglutinin protein of measles virus. J. Virol. 69:1913–1916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kato S, Ohgimoto S, Sharma LB, Kurazono S, Ayata M, Komase K, Takeda M, Takeuchi K, Ihara T, Ogura H. 2009. Reduced ability of hemagglutinin of the CAM-70 measles virus vaccine strain to use receptors CD46 and SLAM. Vaccine 27:3838–3848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Sheshberadaran H, Norrby E. 1986. Characterization of epitopes on the measles virus hemagglutinin. Virology 152:58–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ertl OT, Wenz DC, Bouche FB, Berbers GA, Muller CP. 2003. Immunodominant domains of the Measles virus hemagglutinin protein eliciting a neutralizing human B cell response. Arch. Virol. 148:2195–2206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES