Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR logoLink to Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR
. 2013 Feb 1;7(2):364–365. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/4737.2770

An Interesting Case of a Subcutaneous Nodule

Basavaprabhu Achappa 1, Deepak Madi 2,, Soundarya Mahalingam 3
PMCID: PMC3592314  PMID: 23543386

Abstract

Human dirofilariasis is a zoonotic disease which is caused by the filarial nematodes, Dirofilaria repens and Dirofilaria immitis. Dirofilariae are transmitted to humans via mosquito bites. Human Dirofilariasis presents commonly as subcutaneous nodules, pulmonary nodules or nodules in the eyes. They are considered as emerging pathogens. We are presenting a case of human Dirofilariasis from Karnataka, which was caused by Dirofilaria repens.

Keywords: Dirofilariasis, Dirofilaria repens

INTRODUCTION

Dirofilariasis is caused by filarial nematodes. It is a zoonotic infection which is caused by D.immitis, D.repens, D tenuis and D.ursi. It is transmitted to humans by the Culex, Aedes or the Anopheles mosquitoes, which ingest the blood-containing microfilaria from affected dogs. Human Dirofilariasis is rare. It usually presents with nodular lesions in the lung, the subcutaneous tissues or the eyes. The reported cases of the Dirofilaria infection in humans are mainly caused by 2 species, Dirofilaria immitis (D.immitis) and Dirofilaria repens. We are presenting a case of human Dirofilariasis from Karnataka, which was caused by Dirofilaria repens.

CASE REPORT

A 48 year old female presented to our institution with a subcutaneous nodule above her left eye of 4 month’s duration. The nodule enlarged gradually. Her physical examination showed a well-defined, nontender and oval shaped nodule which was about 2 × 2 centimetre in size.

Her lab investigations showed Hb -12.9g/dl, Total White Blood Cell count - 5900 cells/cu.mm, Differential count– N-65, L-28, E-6, M-1 and ESR- 13mm/1st hour. Her chest X-ray was normal.

An excision biopsy of the nodule was performed. The gross examination revealed 2 irregular pale brown tissues that measured 0.6 cm and 1.8 cm in diameter. There was no evidence of calcification within the nodule. The pathological examination revealed a nematode which was embedded in the eosinophil rich granular material [Table/Fig-1 and 2]. Under the microscope, the nematode was found to have a thick laminated cuticle which had prominent longitudinal ridges and transverse striations. The worm was identified as Dirofilaria repens, based on its morphology.

[Table/Fig-1]:

[Table/Fig-1]:

Filarial worm embedded in eosinophilic granular material

[Table/Fig-2]:

[Table/Fig-2]:

Filarial worm with thick cuticle, transverse ridges and longitudinal striae

DISCUSSION

Though human Dirofilariasis is rare, the number of cases of Dirofilariasis which are caused by Dirofilaria repens has been increasing worldwide over the last decade. In India, cases of human Dirofilariasis are being reported from Karnataka [1], Kerala [2], Tamil Nadu [3] and Assam [4]. The definitive hosts of Dirofilaria repens and Dirofilaria immitis are dogs, but other animals have also been reported as the reservoirs of this disease (cats and bears).

The vectors for this parasite are mosquitoes (Culex and Anopheles) [5]. The adult female worms of D. repens release microfilariae into the circulation of the infected animals, which are ingested by the vectors during a blood meal [6]. An accidental human infection results in a subcutaneous mass anywhere in the body, preferentially around the eye. In response to the infection, an inflammatory granulomatous reaction develops. The adult worms do not reach maturity in humans and they do not produce microfilaria.

Human Dirofilariasis can be classified as pulmonary and extrapulmonary Dirofilariasis. Extra-pulmonary Dirofilariasis is classified further into: subcutaneous, visceral, and ophthalmic Dirofilariasis [7]. D. repens usually resides subcutaneously, while D. immitis frequently ends up in the lung. Khurana et al have reported three cases of human subcutaneous Dirofilariasis from India [8].

The diagnosis is confirmed by studying their morphologies after their removal. The worms which belong to the genus, Dirofilaria are identified by their thick laminated cuticle, broad lateral ends and large muscle cells. D.immitis can be differentiated from D. repens by the absence of ridges [3]. An accurate diagnosis can also be made by a PCR-based DNA analysis [9]. A PCR based DNA analysis was not done in our case.

A complete surgical excision of the lesion is the treatment of choice for the patients with human Dirofilariasis. Chemotherapy is not necessary as microfilaraemia is extremely rare [10]. Dirofilariasis is considered an emerging zoonotic disease [11]. An increased awareness on this emerging zoonotic infection in India among doctors will help in the early detection of this disease.

CONCLUSION

This case report suggests that Dirofilariasis should be considered as a differential diagnosis in the patients who present with subcutaneous nodular lesions.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Radha Pai, Department of Pathology, for her help.

Financial or Other Competing Interests

None.

REFERENCES

  • [1].Nadgir S, Tallur SS, Mangoli V, Halesh LH, Krishna BV. Subconjunctival dirofilariasis in India. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2001;32:244–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Ittyerah TP, Mallik D. A case of subcutaneous dirofilariasis of the eyelid in the South Indian state of Kerala. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2004;52:235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Sathyan P, Manikandan P, Bhaskar M, Padma S, Singh G, Appalaraju B. Subtenons infection by Dirofilariarepens. Indian J Med. Microbiol. 2006;24:61–62. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.19899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Nath R, Gogoi R, Bordoloi N, Gogoi T. Ocular dirofilariasis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010;53:157–59. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.59213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Athari A. Zoonotic subcutaneous dirofilariases in Iran. Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2003;6:63–65. [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Joseph K, Vinayakumar AR, Criton S, Vishnu MS, Pariyaram SE. Periorbital mass with cellulitis caused by dirofilaria. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2011;29:431–33. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.90190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Akao N. Human dirofilariasis in Japan. Trop Med Health. 2011;39:65–71. doi: 10.2149/tmh.39-1-suppl_2-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Khurana S, Singh G, Bhatti HS, Malla N. Human subcutaneous dirofilariasis in India: A report of three cases with brief review of literature. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2010;28:394–96. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.71836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Cancrini G, Prieto G, Favia G, Giannetto S, Tringali R, Pietrobelli M, et al. Serological assays on eight cases of human dirofilariasis identified by morphology and DNA diagnostics. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1999;93:147–52. doi: 10.1080/00034989958627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Padmaja P, Kanagalakshmi, Samuel R, Kuruvilla PJ, Mathai E. Subcutaneous dirofilariasis in southern India: A case report. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2005;99:437–40. doi: 10.1179/36485905X36253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Azari-Hamidian S, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Javadian E, Mobedi I, Abai MR. Review of dirofilariasis in Iran. J Med Facul Guilan Univ Med. Sci. 2006;15:102–13. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR are provided here courtesy of JCDR Research & Publications Private Limited

RESOURCES