Skip to main content
PMC home page
NeuroRx logoLink to NeuroRx
. 2012 Sep 5;3(4):525–534. doi: 10.1016/j.nurx.2006.07.002

Community neurorehabilitation: A synthesis of current evidence and future research directions

Sarah E Chard 1,✉
PMCID: PMC3593402  PMID: 17012066

Summary

Over the past decade, community neurorehabilitation has emerged as a promising extension of neurological rehabilitation. The goal of community neurorehabilitation is to maximize functional ability and quality of life through multidimensional rehabilitation that occurs while the individual is living in a home versus acute or transitory care setting. Because of its multidisciplinary focus, many variations of community neurorehabilitation teams have been implemented. Critical gaps exist, however, in understanding of the influence of structural and procedural differences among programs, as well as patient level variables such as social support, on recovery. This paper examines the current evidence of the effectiveness of community neurorehabilitation through a review of the findings of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of four neurological conditions: stroke, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, and Parkinson’s disease. It focuses in particular on the data regarding physical therapy and occupational therapy, which are two of the primary components of community neurorehabilitation, programs.

Key Words: Community neurorehabilitation, review, stroke, multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson’s disease

References

  • 1.Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics — 2006 Update. Circulation. 2006;113:e85–e151. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.171600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Langlois J, Rutland-Brown W, Thomas K. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Office of Communications and Public Liaison, NINDS. Parkinson’s disease: hope through research. Available at: http://www. ninds.nih.gov/disorders/parkinsons_disease/detail_parkinsons_ disease.htm. Accessed Date: May 18, 2006.
  • 4.National Parkinson Foundation. About Parkinson disease. Available at: http://www.parkinson.org/site/apps/s/content.asp?c= 9dJFJLPwB&b=108269&ct=89590.Accessed Date: May 18, 2006.
  • 5.Office of Communications and Public Liaison, NINDS. Multiple sclerosis: hope through research. Available at: http://www.nmds. nih.gov/disorders/multiple_sclerosis/detail_multiple_sclerosis.htm. Accessed Date: May 18, 2006.
  • 6.Hankey GJ, Langhorne P. Services for reducing the duration of hospital care for acute stroke patients. Stroke. 2006;37:276–277. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000195128.01213.4b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Langhorne P, Taylor G, Murray G, et al. Early supported discharge services for stroke patients: a meta-analysis of individual patients’ data. Lancet. 2005;365:501–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17868-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barnes MP, Radermacher H. Neurological rehabilitation in the community. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:244–248. doi: 10.1080/165019701753236419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brown TR, Kraft GH. Exercise and rehabilitation for individuals with multiple sclerosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2005;16:513–555. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2005.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Watson C, Rutterford NA, Shortland D, Williamson N, Alderman N. Reduction of chronic aggressive behaviour 10 years after brain injury. Brain Inj. 2001;11:1003–1015. doi: 10.1080/02699050010022662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Outpatient Service TrialistsTherapy-based rehabilitation for stroke patients living at home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (1):CD002925 (Online). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Rietberg MB, Brooks D, Uitdehaag BMJ, Kwakkel G. Exercise therapy for multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;25:CD003980–CD003980. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003980.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wade D. Community rehabilitation, or rehabilitation in the community? Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:875–875. doi: 10.1080/0963828031000122267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wade DT, de Jong BA. Recent advances in rehabilitation. BMJ. 2000;320:1385–1388. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kraft GH, Freal JE, Coryell JK. Disability, disease duration, and rehabilitation service needs in multiple sclerosis: patient perspectives. Arch Phys Med and Rehab. 1986;67:164–168. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(86)90060-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Anderson C, Ni Mhurchu C, Brown PM, Carter K. Stroke rehabilitation services to accelerate hospital discharge and provide home-based care: an overview and cost analysis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;20:537–552. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220080-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cott C. Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1411–1422. doi: 10.1080/09638280400000237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thompson AJ. Neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: foundations, facts and fiction. Curr Opin Neurol. 2005;18:267–271. doi: 10.1097/01.wco.0000169743.37159.a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Freeman JA, Hobart JC, Thompson AJ. Outcomes-based research in neurorehabilitation: the need for multidisciplinary team involvement. Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18:106–110. doi: 10.3109/09638289609166025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ashburn A, Jones D, Plant R, et al. Physiotherapy for people with Parkinson’s disease in the UK: an exploration of practice. Int J of Ther Rehabil. 2004;11:160–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Geddes JML, Chamberlain MA. Home-based rehabilitation for people with stroke: a comparative study of six community services providing coordinated, multidisciplinary treatment. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:589–599. doi: 10.1191/0269215501cr452oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Makepeace RW, Barnes MP, Semlyen JK, Stevenson J. The establishment of a community multiple sclerosis team. Int J Rehabil Res. 2001;24:137–141. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200106000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Enderby P, Wade DT. Community rehabilitation in the United Kingdom. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:577–581. doi: 10.1191/0269215501cr450oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McMillan TM, Ledder H. A survey of services provided by community neurorehabilitation teams in South East England. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:582–588. doi: 10.1191/0269215501cr541oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Steultjens E, Dekker J, Bouter L, van de Nes J, Cup E, van den Ende C. Occupational therapy for stroke patients: a systematic review. Stroke. 2003;34:676–687. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000057576.77308.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wade DT. Community rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:575–575. doi: 10.1191/0269215501cr449ed. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Turner-Stokes L, Disler PB, Nair A, Wade DT. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;20:CD004170–CD004170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004170.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gage H, Storey L. Rehabilitation for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review of available evidence. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:463–482. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr764oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Legg L, Langhorne P, Outpatient Service Trialists Outpatient Service Trialists. Rehabilitation therapy services for stroke patients living at home: systematic review of randomized trials. Lancet. 2004;363:352–356. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15434-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Legg L, Langhorne P. Therapy-based rehabilitation for stroke patients living at home. Stroke. 2004;35:1022–1022. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000121043.21973.9F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Early Supported Discharge Trialists Services for reducing duration of hospital care for acute stroke patients. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2005;18:CD000443–CD000443. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000443.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Walker MF, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath P, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of community occupational therapy for stroke patients. Stroke. 2004;35:2226–2232. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000137766.17092.fb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Van Peppen RPS, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJM, Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what’s the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:833–862. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr843oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pang MYC, Eng JJ, Dawson AS, Gylfadottir S. The use of aerobic exercise training in improving aerobic capacity in individuals with stroke: a meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:97–111. doi: 10.1191/0269215506cr926oa. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Langhorne P, Dennis MS, Kalra L, Shepperd S, Wade DT, Wolfe CD. Services for helping acute stroke patients avoid hospital admission. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2):CD000444. Review. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 37.Kraft GH. Rehabilitation principles for patients with multiple sclerosis. J Spinal Cord Med. 1998;21:117–120. doi: 10.1080/10790268.1998.11719518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kesselring Rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. ACNR. 2002;2:6–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kesselring, Beer S. Symptomatic therapy and neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4:643–652. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70193-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Patti F, Ciancio MR, Cacopardo M, et al. Effects of a short outpatient rehabilitation treatment on disability of multiple sclerosis patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol. 2003;250:861–866. doi: 10.1007/s00415-003-1097-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Di Fabio RP, Soderberg J, Choi T, Hansen CR, Schapiro RT. Extended outpatient rehabilitation: its influence on symptom frequency, fatigue, and functional status for persons with progressive multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:141–146. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90290-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Steultjens EMJ, Dekker J, Bouter LM, et al. Occupational therapy for multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(3): CD003608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 43.Kesselring J. Rehabilitation in MS is effective. Intl Multiple Sclerosis J. 2001;8:68–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Petajan JH, White AT. Recommendations for physical activity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Sports Med. 1999;27:179–191. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199927030-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mazaux JM, Richer E. Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury in adults. Disabil Rehabil. 1998;20:435–435. doi: 10.3109/09638289809166108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cope DN. The effectiveness of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a review. Brain Inj. 1995;9:649–670. doi: 10.3109/02699059509008224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chesnut RM, Carney N, Maynard H, Mann NC, Patterson P, Helfand M. Summary report: evidence for the effectiveness of rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14:176–188. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199904000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Brooks N. The effectiveness of post-acute rehabilitation. Brain Inj. 1994;5:103–109. doi: 10.3109/02699059109008082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Thompson AJ, Playford ED. Rehabilitation for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2001;357:410–410. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Deane KHO, Ellis-Hill C, Jones D, et al. Systematic review of paramedical therapies for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2002;17:984–991. doi: 10.1002/mds.10197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lim I, van Wegen E, de Goede C, et al. Effects of external rhythmical cueing on gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:695–713. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr906oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Murphy S, Tickle-Degnen L. The effectiveness of occupational therapy-related treatments for persons with Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analytic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55:385–392. doi: 10.5014/ajot.55.4.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Trend P, Kaye J, Gage H, Owen C, Wade D. Short-term effectiveness of intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation for people with Parkinson’s disease and their carers. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:717–725. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr545oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wade DT, Gage H, Owen C, Trend P. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for people with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74:158–162. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.2.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Anderson C, Rubenach S, Mhurchu CN, Clark M, Spencer C, Winsor A. Home or hospital for stroke rehabilitation? results of a randomized controlled trial: I: health outcomes at 6 months. Stroke. 2000;31:1024–1031. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.31.5.1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Anderson C, Mhurchu CN, Rubenach S, Clark M, Spencer C, Winsor A. Home or hospital for stroke rehabilitation? results of a randomized controlled trial: II: cost minimization analysis at 6 months. Stroke. 2000;31:1032–1037. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.31.5.1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bode RK, Heinemann A, Semik P, Mallinson T. Relative importance of rehabilitation therapy characteristics on functional outcomes for persons with stroke. Stroke. 2004;35:2537–2542. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000145200.02380.a3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ottenbacher K. The Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project. Stroke. 2005;86:S121–S123. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Horn S, DeJong G, Smout R, Gassaway J, James R, Conroy B. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2005;86:S101–S114. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kwakkel G, Van Peppen RPS, Wagenaar RC, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35:2529–2539. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000143153.76460.7d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ryan T, Enderby P, Rigby A. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate intensity of community-based rehabilitation provision following stroke or hip fracture in old age. Clin Rehabil. 2005;20:123–131. doi: 10.1191/0269215506cr933oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.DeJong G, Horn S, Conroy B, Nichols D, Healton E. Opening the black box of poststroke rehabilitation: stroke rehabilitation patients, processes, and outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:S1–S7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Q. 2005;83:691–729. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Larson J, Muller A. Managing the quality of health care. J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2002;25:261–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hoenig H, Sloane R, Horner RD, Zolkewitz M, Duncan PW, Hamilton BB. A taxonomy for classification of stroke rehabilitation services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:853–862. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.5569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Klonoff PS, Lamb DG, Henderson SW, Shepherd J. Outcome assessment after milieu-oriented rehabilitation: new considerations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:684–690. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90045-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.McCorkel BA, Glueckauf RL, Ecklund-Johnson EP, Tomusk AB, Trexler LE, Diller L. Development and exploratory analysis of the neurorehabilitation program styles survey. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;18:425–425. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200309000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hoenig H, Duncan PW, Horner RD, et al. Structure, process, and outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Med Care. 2002;40:1036–1047. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200211000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hart E. System induced setbacks in stroke recovery. Sociol Health Illn. 2001;23:101–123. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Logan P, Gladman JRF, Drummond A, Radford KA. A study of interventions and related outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of occupational therapy and leisure therapy for community stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:249–255. doi: 10.1191/0269215503cr593oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kelly-Hayes M. Stroke outcome measures. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004;19:301–307. doi: 10.1097/00005082-200409000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kwon S, Hartzema A, Duncan PW, Min-Lai S. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale. Stroke. 2004;35:918–923. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000119385.56094.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Boylstein C, Rittman M. The importance of narratives in stroke rehabilitation. Generations. 2003;27:49–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cicerone KD, Mott T, Azulay J, Friel JC. Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:943–950. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Boden-Albala B, Litwak E, Elkind M, Rundek T, Sacco R. Social isolation and outcomes post stroke. Neurology. 2005;64:1888–1892. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000163510.79351.AF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Shaughnessy M, Resnick B, Macko R. Testing a model of post-stroke exercise behavior. Rehabil Nurs. 2006;31:15–21. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2006.tb00005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Resnick B. Efficacy beliefs in geriatric rehabilitation. J Gerontol Nurs. 1998;24:34–44. doi: 10.3928/0098-9134-19980701-08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Watson LD, Quinn DA. Stages of stroke: a model for stroke rehabilitation. Br J Nurs. 1998;7:631–640. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1998.7.11.5668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Barker RN, Brauer SG. Upper limb recovery after stroke: the stroke survivors’ perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:1213–1223. doi: 10.1080/09638280500075717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Sheriff JN, Chenoweth L. Challenges in conducting research to improve the health of people with Parkinson’s disease and the well-being of their family carers. Int J Rehabil Res. 2003;26:201–205. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200309000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Peters MD, McLean A. The evolution of the clinician-scientist model of neurological rehabilitation. Brain Inj. 1995;9:543–552. doi: 10.3109/02699059509008213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from NeuroRx are provided here courtesy of Am. Soc. for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics

RESOURCES