Abstract
Chronic exposure to drinking water contaminated with inorganic arsenic (iAs) is associated with an increased risk of urinary bladder (UB) cancers in humans. The exact role of specific iAs metabolite(s) in As-mediated carcinogenesis remains largely unknown. Experimental evidence suggests that trivalent arsenicals, namely arsenite (iAsIII) and two of its metabolites, monomethylarsonous acid (MMAIII) and dimethylarsinous acid (DMAIII), are possible proximate UB carcinogens. Here, we used a transcriptomics approach to examine perturbed molecular pathways in a human urothelial cell line (UROtsa) after short-term exposure to iAsIII, MMAIII and DMAIII. Molecular pathways containing genes that encode proteins implicated in UB cancer development were perturbed by both MMAIII and DMAIII. These pathways included those of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK 1/2 MAPK) and nuclear factor kappa beta (NF-κB). Together, these results may inform the current understanding of effects in the UB induced by acute As exposure and the relationship of these effects with As-mediated carcinogenesis.
Keywords: Arsenite, gene expression, microarray, urinary bladder cancer, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase, nuclear factor kappa beta, inflammation, monomethylarsonous acid, dimethylarsinous acid, UROtsa, MMAIII, DMAIII
INTRODUCTION
Chronic arsenic (As) exposure is associated with the development of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and various cancers [1]. The most common source of chronic As exposure worldwide is drinking water contaminated with inorganic forms of As (iAs) from natural, geologic sources [2, 3]. Inorganic As exists in drinking water as a mixture of two oxidation states, namely trivalent arsenite (iAsIII) and pentavalent arsenate (iAsV), which predominate in anaerobic and aerobic conditions, respectively [4]. Millions of people worldwide and an estimated tens of millions in Bangladesh alone are exposed to iAs levels in drinking water that far exceed the World Health Organization’s recommended limit of 10 ppb [5-7].
Although iAs is classified as a known human carcinogen with primary targets of the skin, lung, and urinary bladder (UB) [8], the mode of action (MOA) of iAs carcinogenesis remains largely undefined [9-11]. Experimental evidence supports the generation of oxidative stress as a major factor, which can contribute to carcinogenesis by causing macromolecule (e.g. DNA) damage and stimulating signaling pathways that control processes such as proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis [11-14]. Arsenic can exert other potentially carcinogenic effects on cells that are not necessarily associated with oxidative stress. For instance, while they are not point mutagens, arsenicals can induce other genetic alterations such as chromosomal aberrations [15, 16], can bind and inhibit enzymes [17], and can influence gene expression by altering the epigenome [18].
Determining which of these effects is a key event in As carcinogenesis is complicated by iAsIII/V metabolism. Arsenite and arsenate are biotransformed in humans and rodents to yield several trivalent and pentavalent methylated arsenical metabolites. During this process, individual methyl groups are added to iAs in a stepwise, unidirectional manner [19]. Chronic exposure to iAsIII/V results in six major arsenicals in human urine in which 10-30% of the total As content exists as trivalent and pentavalent iAs (iAsIII+V), and 10-30% exists as the monomethylated forms monomethylarsonous acid (MMAIII) and monomethylarsonic acid (MMAV). The remaining 60-80% exists as the trivalent/pentavalent dimethylated species dimethylarsinous acid (DMAIII) and dimethylarsinic acid (DMAV) [20-22]. One or more of these methylated arsenicals may contribute to the carcinogenic effect of chronic iAs exposure [23]. Not all methylated arsenicals have equivalent biological effects. For example, in general the trivalent arsenicals MMAIII and DMAIII are more cytotoxic in vitro than their pentavalent counterparts and iAsIII/V [24] and have been considered likely carcinogenic arsenicals in vivo [25].
Recently, we examined the gene expression profiles of normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEKs) after short-term exposure (24 h) to iAsIII, MMAIII and DMAIII [26]. Several trends in gene expression were observed after exposure to iAsIII and especially MMAIII that were consistent with several proposed mechanisms of As-mediated skin carcinogenesis. For example, increased mRNA levels of oxidative stress response genes, keratinocyte growth factors, and genes in the extracellular-signal regulated mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK1/2 MAPK) and nuclear factor kappa beta (NF-κB) pathways were observed. Curiously, we observed a minimal transcriptional response in NHEKs after exposure to multiple doses of DMAIII, and these DMAIII-induced transcriptional profiles were distinct from those induced by iAsIII or MMAIII. These results suggested that, unlike iAsIII and MMAIII, DMAIII is not a potent transcriptional inducer of genes that elicit carcinogenic responses in the skin, at least after short-term exposure.
Here we set out to examine the transcriptional responses of human urothelial cells (UROtsas), another major target cell type of As carcinogenesis, to determine if short-term exposure to iAsIII, MMAIII and DMAIII is associated with modulation of genes implicated in UB cancer development. We found that both MMAIII and DMAIII perturbed molecular networks involving signaling pathways and genes implicated in UB cancer development, namely the ERK1/2 MAPK and NF-κB pathways. Together, these results suggest that even after short-term exposure to trivalent arsenicals, transcriptional alterations have occurred that may provide insight into the MOA of As-induced carcinogenesis in the UB.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Arsenicals
The arsenicals used in this study have been previously described [26]. Briefly, working solutions of sodium m-arsenite (NaAsO2; herein referred to as iAsIII), monomethylarsonous acid in the form of (CH3)AsI2 (MMAIII), and dimethylarsinous acid in the form of (CH3)2AsI (DMAIII) were prepared in sterile phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4 (PBS) immediately before use.
UROtsa Growth Conditions
UROtsas, a human urothelial cell line transformed by the large T antigen of SV40 [27], were obtained from Dr. Zuzana Drobna (Department of Nutrition, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). UROtsas do not exhibit anchorage-independent cell growth and do not develop tumors in immunocompromised mice if maintained at low passage numbers [27, 28]. Routine UROtsa growth and subculturing conditions were as described by Rossi et al. [29]. UROtsas were grown in UROtsa growth medium which contained 1:1 DMEM/Ham’s F12 media (GIBCO/Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) [29]. Prior to arsenical treatment, the growth medium was removed, cells were washed briefly with PBS and the growth medium was replaced with 1:1 DMEM/Ham’s F12 without FBS (UROtsa dosing medium). Cells were grown in a 37°C, 5% CO2 humid atmosphere in the absence of antibiotic and antifungal agents and matching cell line passages were used for all endpoint analyses.
Arsenical Treatment for Cytotoxicity Determination and Microarray Analysis
The UROtsas utilized in this study have been previously shown to be a suitable cell line to study the effects of individual arsenicals as they readily absorb them but have little [30] or no [24, 31, 32] capacity to further methylate them. For cytotoxicity assays, UROtsas were seeded into 96 well plates at a density of 10,000 cells/cm2 and grown in 250 μl/well of their respective growth medium as described above until they reached ~70% confluence (48 h). For each well, the culture medium was then removed, the cells were briefly rinsed with PBS, and 125 μl of UROtsa dosing medium was added. An additional 125 μl of UROtsa dosing medium containing PBS (vehicle-treated controls) or 125 μl PBS containing appropriate concentrations of iAsIII, MMAIII or DMAIII was added to each well to yield final arsenical concentrations of 0, 0.01, 0.03, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30 and 100 μM. Following incubation for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2, all media were removed and replaced with fresh UROtsa dosing medium containing 0.003% neutral red dye (Sigma #N6264). After 3 h incubation at 37°C, 5% CO2, dye taken up by viable cells was extracted with a 50% ethanol/1% acetic acid solution and quantified spectrophotometrically at 540 nm. For each arsenical dose, data were averaged from 18 wells (from three independent experiments containing 6 wells each) and normalized to vehicle-treated controls.
For RNA isolation, UROtsas were seeded at a density of 3500 cells/cm2 in 25 cm2 flasks and grown in UROtsa growth medium as described above until they were ~70% confluent (48 h). The cells were rinsed briefly with PBS followed by exposure to 1.0 μM iAsIII, MMAIII, DMAIII or PBS (vehicle-treated controls) in UROtsa dosing medium for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. For each flask, the dosing medium was removed and the cells were lysed with 3 ml TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen cat# 15596-026) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell lysates were stored at −70°C until RNA was extracted.
RNA Extraction and RNA Processing
RNA was prepared from each lysed cell sample according to the TRIzol RNA extraction protocol (Invitrogen) followed by the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). RNA concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically (A260). RNA quality was determined spectrophotometrically (A260/A280) and by using the RNA 6000 Nano Assay with the 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA). For microarray analysis, 15 μg of total RNA from each sample was converted to biotinylated cRNA using the Affymetrix 3′ IVT Express Kit (cat #901228) as described by the manufacturer (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Total cRNA was then quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE) and evaluated for quality after fragmentation using a 2100 Bioanalyzer. The cRNA was hybridized to Affymetrix GeneChip® Human U133 Plus 2.0 arrays overnight at 45°C in an Affymetrix GeneChip Hybridization Oven 640. Each chip was hybridized with cRNA obtained from one biological replicate. The hybridized arrays were washed and stained using a Fluidics Station 450 and scanned using a GeneChip Scanner 3000 7G according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Affymetrix). After scanning, raw data (.cel files) were obtained using Affymetrix GeneChip® Command Console software (v. 3.0).
Microarray Analyses
Three biological replicates were used for each of the arsenical treatment groups and vehicle-treated controls. Robust Multiarray Average (RMA) was used for normalization and probe-level summarization [33] using Partek Genomics Suite ™ (version 6.5) software (Partek, Inc. St. Louis, MO). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) after arsenical treatment compared to controls were identified using the following filters in Partek: 1-way ANOVA (p<0.05) followed by Benjamini-Hochberg FDR (q<0.05) correction and >1.5 or <−1.5-fold change in expression. Hierarchical clustering was performed on genes that were differentially expressed in at least one arsenical treatment group relative to controls.
IPA software (version 8.8, Ingenuity® Systems, www.ingenuity.com) was used to analyze for enriched biological functions and molecular interactions associated with DEGs. The Ingenuity Knowledge Base within IPA is a literature-based database of known molecular interactions and functional annotations based on known relationships between cells, cellular components, drugs and diseases. For network generation, DEGs from each group were mapped to their corresponding object within the Ingenuity Knowledge Base. These objects were then overlaid on the global network of known molecular interactions, and smaller networks of interacting molecules within the global network were algorithmically generated based on their connectivity. Statistically significant associations of DEGs with biological functions and diseases (p<0.005) and canonical pathways (p<0.05) were also determined using IPA. All p values were calculated in IPA using a right-tailed Fisher’s exact test, which calculates the probability that associated functions, pathways and network interactions were generated due to chance alone.
Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR)
The same total RNA preparations were used for microarray and qRT-PCR analyses. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the LightCycler® 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) using Qiagen’s QuantiTect SYBR Green RT-PCR kit (cat. #204243) and QuantiTect® Primer Assays according to the One Step RT PCR Protocol. Each 50 μl reaction contained 10 ng total RNA from a single biological sample, and three biological replicates were used for each treatment group and vehicle-treated controls. Beta actin (ACTB) was chosen for a reference target for each treatment group due to its stable expression in microarrays across all treatment groups. Expression levels of each target gene were normalized against ACTB expression within each treatment group and fold change values of the normalized target gene expression in arsenical treatment groups vs. vehicle-treated controls were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method [34]. Statistically significant changes in target expression levels between in arsenical treatment groups compared to vehicle-treated controls was determined using a Student’s t-test. The genes and QuantiTect primer assays that detect them were: ACTB as a reference target (Hs_ACTB_2_SG); dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR family) member 2 (DHRS2; Hs_DHRS2_1_SG) for the iAsIII group; matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1; Hs_MMP1_1_SG) and sodium channel, nonvoltagegated 1 alpha (SCNN1A; Hs_SCNN1A_1_SG) for MMAIII group and MMP1 (Hs_MMP1_1_SG) and prostate transmembrane protein, androgen induced 1 (PMEPA1; Hs_PMEPA1_1_SG) for the DMAIII group.
RESULTS
Transcriptional Response after Trivalent Arsenical Exposure
Arsenical concentrations that do not induce considerable cytoxicity/apoptosis have been shown to be relevant for studying perturbations in carcinogenic signaling pathways [14, 26, 35]. We examined the cytotoxic effects of varying doses of iAsIII, MMAIII and DMAIII in UROtsas after 24 h exposure (Figure 1, Supplemental Material). The IC50s for each of the arsenicals were 43 μM, 4.1 μM and 3.7 μM for iAsIII, MMAIII and DMAIII, respectively. For the gene expression analyses, arsenical concentrations that resulted in >75% UROtsa viability were selected. The 1 μM dose met this criterion for each arsenical. This dose is particularly relevant for iAsIII as long-term exposure of UROtsas at this dose results in malignant transformation [36].
Affymetrix microarrays that contained >54,000 probe sets representing >38,500 well-characterized human genes were used for the gene expression analyses. The number of unique UROtsa genes that were differentially expressed in each treatment group relative to controls was: 2 (iAsIII), 763 (MMAIII) and 176 (DMAIII) with some overlap among the genes altered by the arsenicals (Figure 1A; Table 1, Supplementary Material). Of these genes, 830 unique genes were differentially expressed in at least one treatment group (Figure 1B). A total of 108 genes were common between the MMAIII and DMAIII groups, representing 16% and 61% of the total DEGs in these treatment groups, respectively. All of the shared DEGs between the MMAIII and DMAIII groups had a concordant direction of modulation between the two groups.
Figure 1.
(A). Venn diagrams displaying shared and unique UROtsa DEGs among the iAsIII, MMAIII and DMAIII treatment groups. The total number of DEGs in each treatment group is in parentheses. (B). Hierarchical clustering of the 830 unique genes in UROtsas that were differentially expressed vs. controls after 24 h exposure to at least one trivalent arsenical. Z scores of fold change values are shown.
Transcriptional trends observed in microarray experiments were verified by qRT-PCR for five selected targets for the iAsIII (DHRS2), MMAIII (MMP1, SCNN1A) and DMAIII (MMP1, PMEPA1) exposure groups (Figure 2). The targets chosen collectively represent a large range of expression changes in treatment groups relative to controls. Each of the five targets selected for qRT-PCR showed the same direction of modulation compared to controls as observed in microarray experiments. All but PMEPA1 in the DMAIII dose group had a statistically significant change in expression (p<0.01) in the treatment group vs. controls as determined by qRT-PCR (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

Comparison of gene expression changes determined by microarrays and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) of selected genes. Statistically significant changes in gene expression compared to vehicle-treated controls are indicated as determined by microarrays (*) and qRT-PCR (**).
Overview of Statistically Significant Biological Functions and Canonical Pathways Associated with DEGs
DEGs from each of the arsenical treatment groups were analyzed for associated biological functions, diseases, and canonical pathways. The low number of DEGs in the iAsIII treatment group did not result in statistically significant results for these analyses. The five most significant biological functions/diseases associated with the DEGs for the MMAIII exposure group were: cancer (1.12 × 10−11), lipid metabolism (2.13 × 10−9), small molecule biochemistry (2.13 × 10−9), vitamin and mineral metabolism (2.13 × 10−09), and cell death (1.76 × 10μ7). For the DMAIII group, the five most significant biological functions/diseases were: cancer (3.37 × 10−9), reproductive system disease (3.37 × 10−9), cell-to-cell signaling and interaction (2.2 × 10−8), tissue development (2.2 × 10−8), and cellular development (1.72 × 10−7).
The majority of the altered canonical pathways in the MMAIII and DMAIII groups are associated with one or more of the following functions: lipid metabolism, stress response/oxidative stress response, and inflammatory response (Table 2, Supplemental Material). Genes involved in stress response/oxidative stress response were generally upregulated in both the MMAIII and DMAIII groups. Oxidative stress response genes in the MMAIII group included NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, quinine 1 (NQO1), aldehyde oxididase 1 (AOX1), ferritin, heavy polypeptide 1 (FTH), and ferritin, light polypeptide (FTL), all known to play a role in the NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response pathway (Table 2A, Supplemental Material). Upregulated oxidative stress response genes in the MMAIII group also included glutamate cysteine ligase, catalytic subunit (GCLC), glutathione-S-transferase mu 3 (GSTM3), and glutathione reductase (GSR) in the glutathione metabolism pathway (Table 2A, Supplemental Material). The generalized stress response genes in the DMAIII group included tumor necrosis factor (TNF; aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling pathway), heat shock 27 kDa protein (HSP27 aka HSPB1; P38 MAPK pathway), junction mediating and regulatory protein, tumor protein 53 (TP53) cofactor (JMY; TP53 pathway) (Table 2B, Supplemental Material).
Genes that play a role in immune response were particularly enriched in the DMAIII group. These pathways contained many of the same upregulated pro-inflammatory genes such as interleukin 1, alpha (IL1A), interleukin 6 (IL6), interleukin 8 (IL8) and TNF (Table 2B, Supplemental Material).
Molecular Networks Associated with DEGs
To identify genes that encode proteins that interact in the cell and therefore may represent a coordinated response to arsenical exposure, DEGs from each group were analyzed for molecular networks. The 763 DEGs in the MMAIII group encode proteins that interact in 25 sub-networks (Table 3, Supplemental Material). Eighteen out of the 25 MMAIII sub-networks had overlapping proteins which generated a large, interacting protein network (interactome; p<10−18) of 473 total proteins, of which 293 are encoded by MMAIII DEGs (Figure 3A). A total of 14 sub-networks were associated with 176 DMAIII DEGs (Table 3, Supplemental Material). Four out of the 14 DMAIII sub-networks were integrated and part of a larger interactome (p<10−17) of 137 total proteins including 59 encoded by DMAIII-altered DEGs (Figure 3B).
Figure 3.
A-B. Large interacting molecular networks associated with the MMAIII and DMAIII treatment groups, respectively; (C). MMAIII–induced ERK 1/2 MAPK network; (D). DMAIII –induced ERK 1/2 MAPK network; (E). MMAIII–induced NF-κB network; (F). DMAIII–induced NF-κB network. Upregulated and downregulated genes are displayed in red and green, respectively and interacting genes that are not differentially expressed are not shaded.
We performed a detailed analysis of the most significant molecular networks (p≤10−24) generated in the MMAIII and DMAIII treatment groups. Networks in both groups contained signaling proteins that play a role in pathways implicated in cancer development that have been previously shown to be modulated by arsenical exposure, namely those involving ERK 1/2 MAPK and the transcription factor NF-κB (Figure 3C-D and 3E-F, respectively). There were no common modulated genes among any of these ERK1/2 MAPK and NF-κ networks.
The ERK 1/2 MAPK-containing networks in the MMAIII and DMAIII groups were comprised of proteins that have associated functions related to cellular development, i.e. cellular development, cellular growth and proliferation and metabolism (MMAIII) and cellular development and tissue development (DMAIII) (Figure 3C-D; Table 3, Supplemental Material). The NF-κB-containing molecular networks had primary functions associated with drug/lipid metabolism, small molecule biochemistry (MMAIII) and cellular movement, hematological system function and development, and immune cell trafficking (DMAIII) (Figure 3).
Identification of UB Cancer-Associated DEGs
We examined the DEGs in the MMAIII and DMAIII groups for genes with known associations with human cancers, particularly of the UB. In particular, we set out to identify genes that are transcriptionally altered here and have previously been shown to have altered mRNA expression or protein levels in UB cancers compared to normal UB. Several genes that are commonly overexpressed in UB cancers had increased mRNA levels in UROtsas after acute MMAIII and/or DMAIII exposure (Table 4, Supplemental Material). These genes include growth and differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), heparin binding epidermal growth factor (HBEGF), matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1), and IL8 in both the MMAIII and DMAIII groups; mitogen activated protein kinase 1 (MAPK1), heat shock 70 kDa protein 1 (HSPA1A), heat shock 70 kDa protein 1B (HSPA1B), macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), and glucose-phosphate isomerase (GPI) in the MMAIII group; and IL1A, IL6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in the DMAIII group [37-46]. Functions associated with these genes include the promotion of angiogenesis (GPI), growth (HBEGF), and tissue invasiveness (MMP1) [41, 43, 47]. In addition, many of these genes have pro-inflammatory roles, namely MIF, PTGS1, IL1A, IL6, IL8 and TNF [48-51], whereas GDF15 is immunosuppressive [52]. Several of the UB cancer-associated genes enriched amongst the ERK1/2 MAPK or NF-κB-containing molecular networks of the MMAIII (GPI, MAPK1, MIF, PTGS1) and DMAIII (GDF15, HBEGF, IL8, TNF) groups (Figure 3C-F). In addition, several of the pro-inflammatory genes with known associations with UB cancers were among those that had elevated protein levels or were implicated as having important roles in UROtsa malignant transformation after prolonged MMAIII exposure, namely MAPK1, IL8, MIF, PTGS1 in the MMAIII group and IL1A, IL6, PTGS1, TNF in the DMAIII group [53-55].
DISCUSSION
In this work, we set out to investigate the transcriptional responses of UROtsas after acute exposure to iAsIII, MMAIII and DMAIII. Importantly, epidemiological evidence indicates iAs is a human carcinogen with the UB as a major target organ [56]. The MOA of iAs-carcinogenesis in the UB is not well understood, but MMAIII and DMAIII are considered likely key carcinogenic forms. Specifically, MMAIII and DMAIII are often more cytotoxic [24], more potent enzyme inhibitors [57], cause more DNA strand breaks [58], and are more clastogenic [59] than iAsIII or pentavalent arsenicals in vitro. As further evidence of the potential for trivalent arsenicals to induce cancer, adoption of a cancer phenotype in vitro is observed much quicker in rat and human cells after chronic iAsIII exposure if they are capable of biotranforming iAsIII to methylated metabolites [60]. In addition, a recent publication has indicated that MMAIII can act as a multi-organ transplacental carcinogen in mice [61].
In the UB, there is evidence that iAsIII, MMAIII and DMAIII may all play an important role in cancer development. For example, in rats, DMAIII is the likely arsenical responsible for inducing carcinogenic effects in the UB upon exposure to DMAV [62-64]. In addition, UROtsas undergo malignant transformation after long-term exposure to either iAsIII or MMAIII [36, 65]. Together, these results suggest that iAsIII, MMAIII and DMAIII have the potential to elicit carcinogenic effects in urothelial cells.
We previously determined that short-term exposure of NHEKs to trivalent arsenicals in vitro caused arsenical-specific effects in terms of the transcriptional modulation of genes implicated in the development of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) [26]. Here, we expanded this research effort to determine if genes associated with UB cancer development were modulated in UROtsas after short-term trivalent arsenical exposure. We report two key findings: (1) while the magnitude of the transcriptional responses were different between the arsenical groups, short-term exposure to both MMAIII and DMAIII resulted in modulation of ERK 1/2 MAPK- and NF-κB-associated signaling pathways; (2) along with other genes, these modulated signaling pathways in the MMAIII/DMAIII groups are implicated in UB cancer development and also are implicated as important drivers of MMAIII-mediated UROtsa transformation.
Our data highlight differences between the transcriptional profiles for each of the arsenical treatment groups. While DMAIII was the most cytotoxic arsenical (DMAIII≥MMAIII>iAsIII), the greatest transcriptional response was induced by MMAIII exposure (MMAIII>DMAIII>iAsIII) with a 4-fold greater number of genes modulated by MMAIII than DMAIII. Some similarities existed between the MMAIII and DMAIII groups. All of the shared genes between these groups had a concordant direction of modulation compared to controls. Moreover, both groups were enriched for molecular networks containing signaling pathways associated with cancer development, namely the ERK1/2 MAPK and NF-κB pathways. Carcinogenic effects associated with ERK 1/2 MAPK activation include stimulating proliferation, promoting cell migration and invasion, increasing genomic instability, and preventing apoptosis [66, 67]. NF-κB can promote cancer development by stimulating proliferation, angiogenesis, and inflammation [13, 68]. NF-κB and ERK 1/2 can be activated by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and are believed to play important roles in oxidative stress-related cancers associated with metal/metalloid (e.g. As) exposure [13]. Activation of these pathways has long been associated with As exposure in a variety of cell types and is believed to play major roles in As-mediated carcinogenesis through the modulation of genes involved in proliferation, development and inflammation [14, 35, 69]. Importantly, these biological functions (cellular proliferation/development and inflammation) are among the most significant functions associated with the ERK MAPK 1/2 and/or NF-κB-containing molecular networks in the MMAIII and DMAIII groups. These results indicate that short-term exposure to 1 μM MMAIII and DMAIII modulate signaling pathways implicated in cancer development, including As-mediated cancers.
These data also indicate that short-term exposure to MMAIII and DMAIII perturbed signaling pathways and genes implicated in UB cancer development. Chronic inflammatory conditions and signaling pathways that converge on MAPKs, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and NF-κB are believed to play important roles in the development of many UB cancers [70-73]. For example, in UB cancer cell lines, ERK1/2 MAPK activation is associated with sustained cellular proliferation [74] and sustained ERK1/2 MAPK is associated with poor prognosis in UB cancer patients [39]. Additionally, specific inhibitors of NF-κB [75] and inhibitors that target both NF-κB and ERK1/2 MAPK [76] have been associated with the induction of apoptosis and reduced invasion/migration in human UB cell lines, respectively. Pro-inflammatory signaling is associated with the development of many UB cancers, even though UB cancer is a heterologous, multi-stage disease that likely develops via multiple pathways [77]. Most of the UB cancer-associated genes modulated in the MMAIII and/or DMAIII groups have pro-inflammatory roles and are upregulated in response to arsenical exposure relative to controls, namely IL8, PTGS1 observed for both MMAIII and DMAIII; IL1A, IL6, TNF observed in response to DMAIII and MIF observed in response to MMAIII. These results indicate that short-term MMAIII and DMAIII exposure in UROtsas modulates signaling pathways and inflammatory genes implicated as important mediators of some UB cancers.
We also observed similarities between the transcriptional profiles induced by short-term MMAIII and DMAIII exposure and processes implicated in MMAIII-mediated UROtsa transformation. Activated signaling pathways associated with MMAIII-mediated malignant transformation have been characterized extensively, in which chronic inflammation secondary to sustained activation of ERK 1/2 MAPK has been implicated as a potential important mechanism of carcinogenesis. In particular, the upregulation of proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines (e.g. IL1, IL6, IL8 and TNF) and signaling through pathways that involve epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), RAS, MAPK, PI3K, NF-κB and overexpression of certain targets of these pathways, e.g. endoperoxide synthase 1 and 2 (PTGS1/2) are believed to be important for the establishment and/or maintenance of the malignant phenotype of MMAIII-transformed UROtsas [53-55, 78, 79]. Both iAsIII- and MMAIII-transformed UROtsas have characteristics that are consistent with UB cancers that form under chronic inflammatory conditions. In particular, the development of SCCs (as opposed to transitional cell carcinomas, TCCs), is favored under sustained inflammatory conditions in the UB [80], and both iAsIII- and MMAIII-transformed UROtas have squamous characteristics and form SCCs in immunocompromised mice [36, 65]. As previously mentioned, transcript levels of several genes implicated as important mediators of MMAIII-induced UROtsa transformation were increased in this study, namely MAPK1, IL8, MIF, PTGS1 in the MMAIII group and IL1A, IL6, IL8, PTGS1, TNF in the DMAIII group, and the expression/overexpression of these genes or the proteins they encode have been previously associated with UB cancers [38, 39, 42, 44-46, 81]. Taken together, these results not only indicate that pro-inflammatory signaling that occurs concurrently with MMAIII-mediated UROtsa transformation in vitro also occurs in UROtsas after short-term exposure to MMAIII or DMAIII, but that these modulated signaling pathways and pro-inflammatory genes are consistent with those believed to play important roles in the development of UB cancers.
Of note, we observed that both MMAIII and DMAIII were capable of inducing pathways and genes that are implicated in UB cancer development and MMAIII-mediated malignant transformation of UROtsas. Few studies have investigated the gene expression effects in human urothelial cells after DMAIII exposure [82] and to our knowledge, the capacity of DMAIII to induce urothelial cell transformation in vitro is unknown. In our previous study, genes implicated in NMSC development, including those that signal through ERK1/2 MAPK and NF-κB, were strongly associated with MMAIII exposure but not associated with DMAIII exposure [26]. MMAIII is often viewed as a particularly likely carcinogenic metabolite of iAs as it is often the most cytotoxic arsenical observed in vitro [24] and has recently been shown to be a multi-organ transplacental carcinogen [61]. Also, As-exposed populations with increased urinary MMAIII+V/DMAIII+V ratios have been associated with increased susceptibility to As-associated cancers, including NMSCs and UB cancers [83-85]. It has been clearly established that DMAIII can induce carcinogenic effects such as the production of ROS and DNA strand breaks and is the likely reactive metabolite contributing to UB cancers in DMAV-exposed rats [86-88]. Here, we demonstrate that unlike the DMAIII-induced transcriptional response observed in NHEKs, DMAIII exposure is associated with carcinogenic transcriptional alterations in human urothelial cells, suggesting cell-specific responses to DMAIII may exist. Individuals have different capacities to biotransform iAs to MMAs and DMAs, resulting in varying proportions of MMAs and DMAs in urine and tissues [21, 89]. Therefore, taken together, these results suggest cell-specific responses to arsenicals and interindividual differences in iAs metabolism likely play important roles in the susceptibility to As-associated disease.
In summary, this study reveals that acute MMAIII and DMAIII exposures in UROtsas result in transcriptional alterations of pathways implicated in the development of UB cancers and MMAIII-mediated UROtsa transformation in vitro. Future studies should help inform which arsenical(s) exert carcinogenic effects in the UB and inform the relationship of molecular events that drive UB cancers of different etiologies.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported in part by NIEHS T32 ES7018 and ES019315. The authors would like to thank Dr. Kirk Kitchin and Dr. Amy Wang for reviewing this manuscript. This manuscript was reviewed and approved for publication by the National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Approval does not signify that the contents of this article necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EPA. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendations for use.
ABBREVIATIONS
- As
arsenic
- DMAIII
dimethylarsinous acid
- DMAV
dimethylarsinic acid
- DEGs
differentially expressed genes
- ERK1/2 MAPK
extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase
- iAsIII
arsenite
- iAsV
arsenate
- IC50
half maximal inhibitory concentration
- MMAIII
monomethylarsonous acid
- MMAV
monomethylarsonic acid
- MOA
mode of action
- NF-κB
nuclear factor kappa beta
- NRF2
nuclear factor-E2-related factor 2
- qRT-PCR
quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
- UB
urinary bladder
Footnotes
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS The supplemental figure and tables can be downloaded from the journal website along with the article.
REFERENCES
- [1].Kapaj S, Peterson H, Liber K, Bhattacharya P. Human health effects from chronic arsenic poisoning--a review. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2006;41:2399–428. doi: 10.1080/10934520600873571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].National Research Council . Arsenic in the Drinking Water. National Academy Press; Washington, D.C.: 1999. [Google Scholar]
- [3].Nordstrom DK. Public health. Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in ground water. Science. 2002;296:2143–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1072375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1072375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Oremland RS, Stolz JF. The ecology of arsenic. Science. 2003;300:939–44. doi: 10.1126/science.1081903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1081903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Centeno JA, Tseng CH, Vander Voet GB, Finkelman RB. Global impacts of geogenic arsenic: a medical geology research case. Ambio. 2007;36:78–81. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[78:giogaa]2.0.co;2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[78:GIOGAA]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].World Health Organization . Guidelines for drinking water quality. WHO Press; Geneva: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- [7].Tapio S, Grosche B. Arsenic in the aetiology of cancer. Mutat Res. 2006;612:215–46. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2006.02.001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2006.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. IARC Scientific Publications; Lyon, France: 2004. Some Drinking-water Disinfectants and Contaminants, including Arsenic. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Rossman TG. Mechanism of arsenic carcinogenesis: an integrated approach. Mutat Res. 2003;533:37–65. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.07.009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Schuhmacher-Wolz U, Dieter HH, Klein D, Schneider K. Oral exposure to inorganic arsenic: evaluation of its carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2009;39:271–98. doi: 10.1080/10408440802291505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408440802291505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Kitchin KT, Conolly R. Arsenic-induced carcinogenesis--oxidative stress as a possible mode of action and future research needs for more biologically based risk assessment. Chem Res Toxicol. 2010;23:327–35. doi: 10.1021/tx900343d. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/tx900343d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Leonard SS, Harris GK, Shi X. Metal-induced oxidative stress and signal transduction. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;37:1921–42. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.09.010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Valko M, Rhodes CJ, Moncol J, Izakovic M, Mazur M. Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer. Chem Biol Interact. 2006;160:1–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2005.12.009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2005.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Gentry PR, McDonald TB, Sullivan DE, Shipp AM, Yager JW, Clewell HJ., 3rd Analysis of genomic dose-response information on arsenic to inform key events in a mode of action for carcinogenicity. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2010;51:1–14. doi: 10.1002/em.20505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Gradecka D, Palus J, Wasowicz W. Selected mechanisms of genotoxic effects of inorganic arsenic compounds. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2001;14:317–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Kligerman AD, Tennant AH. Insights into the carcinogenic mode of action of arsenic. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007;222:281–8. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2006.10.006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2006.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Kitchin KT, Wallace K. The role of protein binding of trivalent arsenicals in arsenic carcinogenesis and toxicity. J Inorg Biochem. 2008;102:532–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.10.021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Ren X, McHale CM, Skibola CF, Smith AH, Smith MT, Zhang L. An emerging role for epigenetic dysregulation in arsenic toxicity and carcinogenesis. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:11–9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1002114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Thomas DJ, Styblo M, Lin S. The cellular metabolism and systemic toxicity of arsenic. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2001;176:127–44. doi: 10.1006/taap.2001.9258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/taap.2001.9258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Mandal BK, Ogra Y, Anzai K, Suzuki KT. Speciation of arsenic in biological samples. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;198:307–18. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2003.10.030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2003.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Vahter M. Methylation of inorganic arsenic in different mammalian species and population groups. Sci Prog. 1999;82(Pt 1):69–88. doi: 10.1177/003685049908200104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Valenzuela OL, Borja-Aburto VH, Garcia-Vargas GG, Cruz-Gonzalez MB, Garcia-Montalvo EA, Calderon-Aranda ES, et al. Urinary trivalent methylated arsenic species in a population chronically exposed to inorganic arsenic. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:250–4. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Cohen SM, Arnold LL, Eldan M, Lewis AS, Beck BD. Methylated arsenicals: the implications of metabolism and carcinogenicity studies in rodents to human risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006;36:99–133. doi: 10.1080/10408440500534230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408440500534230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Styblo M, Del Razo LM, Vega L, et al. Comparative toxicity of trivalent and pentavalent inorganic and methylated arsenicals in rat and human cells. Arch Toxicol. 2000;74:289–99. doi: 10.1007/s002040000134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002040000134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Kitchin KT, Ahmad S. Oxidative stress as a possible mode of action for arsenic carcigenesis. Toxicol Lett. 2003;137:3–13. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(02)00376-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4274(02)00376-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Bailey KA, Hester SD, Knapp GW, Owen RD, Thai SF. Gene expression of normal human epidermal keratinocytes modulated by trivalent arsenicals. Mol Carcinog. 2010;49:981–98. doi: 10.1002/mc.20677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mc.20677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Petzoldt JL, Leigh IM, Duffy PG, Sexton C, Masters JR. Immortalisation of human urothelial cells. Urol Res. 1995;23:377–80. doi: 10.1007/BF00698738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00698738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Kawamata H, Kameyama S, Nan L, Kawai K, Oyasu R. Effect of epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor beta 1 on growth and invasive potentials of newly established rat bladder carcinoma cell lines. Int J Cancer. 1993;55:968–73. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910550616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910550616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Rossi MR, Masters JR, Park S, Todd JH, Garrett SH, Sens MA, et al. The immortalized UROtsa cell line as a potential cell culture model of human urothelium. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:801–8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.01109801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Bredfeldt TG, Kopplin MJ, Gandolfi AJ. Effects of arsenite on UROtsa cells: low-level arsenite causes accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins that is enhanced by reduction in cellular glutathione levels. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;198:412–8. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2003.10.013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2003.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Lin S, Shi Q, Nix FB, et al. A novel S-adenosyl-L-methionine:arsenic(III) methyltransferase from rat liver cytosol. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:10795–803. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110246200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110246200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Drobna Z, Waters SB, Devesa V, Harmon AW, Thomas DJ, Styblo M. Metabolism and toxicity of arsenic in human urothelial cells expressing rat arsenic (+3 oxidation state)-methyltransferase. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005;207:147–59. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.12.007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2004.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003;4:249–64. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Dong Z. The molecular mechanisms of arsenic-induced cell transformation and apoptosis. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(Suppl 5):757–9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s5757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.02110s5757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Sens DA, Park S, Gurel V, Sens MA, Garrett SH, Somji S. Inorganic cadmium- and arsenite-induced malignant transformation of human bladder urothelial cells. Toxicol Sci. 2004;79:56–63. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfh086. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfh086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Costa VL, Henrique R, Danielsen SA, et al. Three epigenetic biomarkers, GDF15, TMEFF2, and VIM, accurately predict bladder cancer from DNA-based analyses of urine samples. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:5842–51. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Margel D, Pesvner-Fischer M, Baniel J, Yossepowitch O, Cohen IR. Stress Proteins and Cytokines are Urinary Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Staging of Bladder Cancer. Eur Urol. 2011;59:113–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Karlou M, Saetta AA, Korkolopoulou P, et al. Activation of extracellular regulated kinases (ERK1/2) predicts poor prognosis in urothelial bladder carcinoma and is not associated with B-Raf gene mutations. Pathology. 2009;41:327–34. doi: 10.1080/00313020902885011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313020902885011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Nutt JE, Mellon JK, Qureshi K, Lunec J. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 is induced by epidermal growth factor in human bladder tumour cell lines and is detectable in urine of patients with bladder tumours. Br J Cancer. 1998;78:215–20. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1998.467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Amsellem-Ouazana D, Bieche I, Tozlu S, Botto H, Debre B, Lidereau R. Gene expression profiling of ERBB receptors and ligands in human transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol. 2006;175:1127–32. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00317-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00317-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Guo YS, Dai YP, Li W, Liu LD. [Expression and significance of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in bladder urothelial cell carcinoma] Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011;33:28–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Jung I, Messing E. Molecular mechanisms and pathways in bladder cancer development and progression. Cancer Control. 2000;7:325–34. doi: 10.1177/107327480000700401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Seddighzadeh M, Larsson P, Ulfgren AC, et al. Low IL-1alpha expression in bladder cancer tissue and survival. Eur Urol. 2003;43:362–8. doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00047-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00047-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Cardillo MR, Sale P, Di Silverio F. Heat shock protein-90, IL-6 and IL-10 in bladder cancer. Anticancer Res. 2000;20:4579–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Feng CC, Wang PH, Ding Q, et al. Expression of pigment epithelium-derived factor and tumor necrosis factor-alpha is correlated in bladder tumor and is related to tumor angiogenesis. Urol Oncol. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.12.001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Hojilla CV, Mohammed FF, Khokha R. Matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors direct cell fate during cancer development. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:1817–21. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Conroy H, Mawhinney L, Donnelly SC. Inflammation and cancer: macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF)--the potential missing link. QJM. 2010;103:831–6. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcq148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Perrone MG, Scilimati A, Simone L, Vitale P. Selective COX-1 inhibition: A therapeutic target to be reconsidered. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:3769–805. doi: 10.2174/092986710793205408. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/092986710793205408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet. 2001;357:539–45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04046-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04046-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Ariztia EV, Lee CJ, Gogoi R, Fishman DA. The tumor microenvironment: key to early detection. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2006;43:393–425. doi: 10.1080/10408360600778836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408360600778836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Vanhara P, Hampl A, Kozubik A, Soucek K. Growth/differentiation factor-15: prostate cancer suppressor or promoter? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012 doi: 10.1038/pcan.2012.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Escudero-Lourdes C, Medeiros MK, Cardenas-Gonzalez MC, Wnek SM, Gandolfi JA. Low level exposure to monomethyl arsonous acid-induced the over-production of inflammation-related cytokines and the activation of cell signals associated with tumor progression in a urothelial cell model. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;244:162–73. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Eblin KE, Bredfeldt TG, Buffington S, Gandolfi AJ. Mitogenic signal transduction caused by monomethylarsonous acid in human bladder cells: role in arsenic-induced carcinogenesis. Toxicol Sci. 2007;95:321–30. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfl160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Escudero-Lourdes C, Wu T, Camarillo JM, Gandolfi AJ. Interleukin-8 (IL-8) over-production and autocrine cell activation are key factors in monomethylarsonous acid [MMA(III)]-induced malignant transformation of urothelial cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012;258:10–8. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.10.002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2011.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Guha Mazumder DN. Chronic arsenic toxicity & human health. Indian J Med Res. 2008;128:436–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Styblo M, Serves SV, Cullen WR, Thomas DJ. Comparative inhibition of yeast glutathione reductase by arsenicals and arsenothiols. Chem Res Toxicol. 1997;10:27–33. doi: 10.1021/tx960139g. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/tx960139g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Mass MJ, Tennant A, Roop BC, et al. Methylated trivalent arsenic species are genotoxic. Chem Res Toxicol. 2001;14:355–61. doi: 10.1021/tx000251l. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/tx000251l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Kligerman AD, Doerr CL, Tennant AH, et al. Methylated trivalent arsenicals as candidate ultimate genotoxic forms of arsenic: induction of chromosomal mutations but not gene mutations. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2003;42:192–205. doi: 10.1002/em.10192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/em.10192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Kojima C, Ramirez DC, Tokar EJ, et al. Requirement of arsenic biomethylation for oxidative DNA damage. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1670–81. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Tokar EJ, Diwan BA, Thomas DJ, Waalkes MP. Tumors and proliferative lesions in adult offspring after maternal exposure to methylarsonous acid during gestation in CD1 mice. Arch Toxicol. 2012;86:975–82. doi: 10.1007/s00204-012-0820-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Wei M, Wanibuchi H, Morimura K, et al. Carcinogenicity of dimethylarsinic acid in male F344 rats and genetic alterations in induced urinary bladder tumors. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:1387–97. doi: 10.1093/carcin/23.8.1387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/carcin/23.8.1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Wei M, Wanibuchi H, Yamamoto S, Li W, Fukushima S. Urinary bladder carcinogenicity of dimethylarsinic acid in male F344 rats. Carcinogenesis. 1999;20:1873–6. doi: 10.1093/carcin/20.9.1873. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/carcin/20.9.1873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Cohen SM, Arnold LL, Uzvolgyi E, et al. Possible role of dimethylarsinous acid in dimethylarsinic acid-induced urothelial toxicity and regeneration in the rat. Chem Res Toxicol. 2002;15:1150–7. doi: 10.1021/tx020026z. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/tx020026z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Bredfeldt TG, Jagadish B, Eblin KE, Mash EA, Gandolfi AJ. Monomethylarsonous acid induces transformation of human bladder cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2006;216:69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2006.04.011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2006.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Kim EK, Choi EJ. Pathological roles of MAPK signaling pathways in human diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1802:396–405. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Bodart JF. Extracellular-regulated kinase-mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade: unsolved issues. J Cell Biochem. 2010;109:850–7. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Morgan MJ, Liu ZG. Crosstalk of reactive oxygen species and NF-kappaB signaling. Cell Res. 2011;21:103–15. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2010.178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Yang C, Frenkel K. Arsenic-mediated cellular signal transduction, transcription factor activation, and aberrant gene expression: implications in carcinogenesis. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2002;21:331–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Dangle PP, Zaharieva B, Jia H, Pohar KS. Ras-MAPK pathway as a therapeutic target in cancer--emphasis on bladder cancer. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov. 2009;4:125–36. doi: 10.2174/157489209788452812. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157489209788452812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Knowles MA, Platt FM, Ross RL, Hurst CD. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway activation in bladder cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009;28:305–16. doi: 10.1007/s10555-009-9198-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10555-009-9198-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Karashima T, Sweeney P, Kamat A, et al. Nuclear factor-kappaB mediates angiogenesis and metastasis of human bladder cancer through the regulation of interleukin-8. Clinical Cancer Research: an Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2003;9:2786–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Schulz WA. Understanding urothelial carcinoma through cancer pathways. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:1513–8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.21852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Kumar B, Sinclair J, Khandrika L, Koul S, Wilson S, Koul HK. Differential effects of MAPKs signaling on the growth of invasive bladder cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2009;34:1557–64. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Horiguchi Y, Kuroda K, Nakashima J, Murai M, Umezawa K. Antitumor effect of a novel nuclear factor-kappa B activation inhibitor in bladder cancer cells. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2003;3:793–8. doi: 10.1586/14737140.3.6.793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14737140.3.6.793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Zhang L, Chen W, Li X. A novel anticancer effect of butein: inhibition of invasion through the ERK1/2 and NF-kappa B signaling pathways in bladder cancer cells. FEBS Lett. 2008;582:1821–8. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.04.046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2008.04.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Cordon-Cardo C. Molecular alterations associated with bladder cancer initiation and progression. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2008:154–65. doi: 10.1080/03008880802291915. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03008880802291915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Eblin KE, Jensen TJ, Wnek SM, Buffington SE, Futscher BW, Gandolfi AJ. Reactive oxygen species regulate properties of transformation in UROtsa cells exposed to monomethylarsonous acid by modulating MAPK signaling. Toxicology. 2009;255:107–14. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.10.007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2008.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Wnek SM, Jensen TJ, Severson PL, Futscher BW, Gandolfi AJ. Monomethylarsonous acid produces irreversible events resulting in malignant transformation of a human bladder cell line following 12 weeks of low-level exposure. Toxicological Sciences: An Official Journal of the Society of Toxicology. 2010;116:44–57. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Cohen SM. Urinary bladder carcinogenesis. Toxicol Pathol. 1998;26:121–7. doi: 10.1177/019262339802600114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019262339802600114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Bostrom PJ, Aaltonen V, Soderstrom KO, Uotila P, Laato M. Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in urinary bladder carcinomas in vivo and in vitro and prostaglandin E2 synthesis in cultured bladder cancer cells. Pathology. 2001;33:469–74. doi: 10.1080/00313020120083188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313020120083188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Su PF, Hu YJ, Ho IC, Cheng YM, Lee TC. Distinct gene expression profiles in immortalized human urothelial cells exposed to inorganic arsenite and its methylated trivalent metabolites. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:394–403. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Huang YK, Huang YL, Hsueh YM, et al. Arsenic exposure, urinary arsenic speciation, and the incidence of urothelial carcinoma: a twelve-year follow-up study. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:829–39. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9146-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-008-9146-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Steinmaus C, Bates MN, Yuan Y, et al. Arsenic methylation and bladder cancer risk in case-control studies in Argentina and the United States. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:478–88. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000200982.28276.70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000200982.28276.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Chen YC, Guo YL, Su HJ, et al. Arsenic methylation and skin cancer risk in southwestern Taiwan. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:241–8. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000058336.05741.e8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000058336.05741.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Cohen SM, Ohnishi T, Arnold LL, Le XC. Arsenic-induced bladder cancer in an animal model. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007;222:258–63. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2006.10.010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2006.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Nesnow S, Roop BC, Lambert G, et al. DNA damage induced by methylated trivalent arsenicals is mediated by reactive oxygen species. Chem Res Toxicol. 2002;15:1627–34. doi: 10.1021/tx025598y. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/tx025598y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Soto-Reyes E, Del Razo LM, Valverde M, Rojas E. Role of the alkali labile sites, reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in DNA damage induced by methylated trivalent metabolites of inorganic arsenic. Biometals. 2005;18:493–506. doi: 10.1007/s10534-005-0858-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10534-005-0858-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Hughes MF. Biomarkers of exposure: a case study with inorganic arsenic. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1790–6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


