Abstract
The Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) is an excellent animal model for studying human tuberculosis (TB) and also for a number of other infectious and non-infectious diseases. One of the major roadblocks in effective utilization of this animal model is the lack of readily available immunological reagents. In order to address this issue, guinea pig interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) and monocyte chemo attractant protein-1 (MCP-1) were efficiently cloned and expressed in a prokaryotic expression vector (pET-30a) and the expressed proteins in soluble form from both the genes were confirmed by N-terminal sequencing. The biological activity of recombinant guinea pig IL-1β was demonstrated by its ability to drive proliferation in thymocytes and the recombinant guinea pig MCP-1 exhibited chemotactic activity for guinea pig resident peritoneal macrophages. These biologically active recombinant guinea pig proteins will facilitate an in-depth understanding of the role they play in the immune responses of the guinea pig to TB and other diseases.
Keywords: assays, guinea pig, IL-1β, MCP-1, proteins
Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health challenge since time immemorial with an estimated annual death toll of 1.3-1.6 million in 2010, making TB the second leading cause of death from an infectious disease worldwide [1]. Although the only existing vaccine ‘BCG’ has been administered to combat tuberculosis for the past 90 years, the major concern is its variable efficacy [2]. Global initiatives to develop better TB vaccines to prevent disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis are currently underway. These approaches are aimed at replacing, modifying or boosting the existing BCG vaccine [3]. The guinea pig has been extensively used as an excellent animal model for testing novel vaccine candidates during pre-clinical development because it mimics human tuberculosis in the formation of granulomatous lesions and subsequent necrosis, its ability to be infected by a very small number of tubercle bacilli via the respiratory route, a very good response to anti-TB drugs and to vaccination [4, 5, 6]. Although the guinea pig is a promising model for preclinical vaccine development and other research applications in comparison with other animal models such as mice, the shortage of readily available immunological reagents has severely limited its use in TB and many other important diseases [7].
The proteins derived by subcloning and expressing guinea pig cytokine and chemokine genes remain few in number [8] and this is one of the prime reasons that most of the cytokine studies published to date have reported mRNA expression analysis by real time PCR. The availability of recombinant guinea pig proteins and antibodies to those proteins would allow a deeper understanding of the host response to vaccination and infection including the evaluation of novel vaccines. These guinea pig proteins will also facilitate in vitro as well as in vivo studies for a number of other infectious and non-infectious diseases. Our laboratory has been actively involved in developing molecular and immunological reagents for guinea pig cytokine and chemokines such as interleukin-8 (IL-8) [9], regulated upon activation, normal T-cell expressed, and secreted (RANTES) [10], tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [11], interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) [12], interleukin-4 (IL-4) [13] and interleukin-10 (IL-10) [14]. Realizing the potential of guinea pig model of pulmonary tuberculosis, other groups also started to actively contribute to the wealth of guinea pig immunological reagents for analyzing cellular immune responses [15].
The ubiquitous cytokine IL-1β has been shown to play an important role in host resistance to mycobacteria [16]. IL-1β is released from cells after cleavage of a pro-form by caspase 1 in response to many pathogens [17]. IL-1β activates many different cell types and produces a range of inflammatory activities as it is often involved in immune responses [18]. Increased gene expression of IL-1β was observed in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cells from tuberculosis patients when compared with cells from healthy individuals 19]. Decreased levels of IL-1β expression were observed in patients who responded early (early responders) to anti-TB therapy [20]. Monocytes are crucial in containing M. tuberculosis infection, and MCP-1 plays a role in their recruitment to the site of infection [21]. A recent study has shown that MCP-1 responses were very important in distinguishing people with active tuberculosis from people with latent tuberculosis [22].
Guinea pig IL-1β was previously cloned [23] but has not been expressed. In this study, we subcloned rgp IL-1β in the pET-30a vector, expressed it in Escherichia coli and analyzed the recombinant protein for its ability to drive proliferation in thymocytes. MCP-1 was previously expressed using COS cells and the biological activity was determined using peritoneal exudate macrophages [24]. In this study, we expressed recombinant guinea pig MCP-1 in E. coli and determined its biological activity using resident peritoneal macrophages. Here we report expression of biologically active recombinant guinea pig (rgp) IL-1β and MCP-1 proteins that can be used for a wide range of research applications.
Materials and Methods
Cloning of guinea pig IL-1 and MCP-1 genes
The cloning of full-length guinea pig IL-1β (Accession number-AF119622) and MCP-1 (Accession number-NM_001172926) genes into the pBlueScript vector was accomplished by using the ConA-stimulated guinea pig spleen cDNA library [25, 26]. The genes residing in the pBlueScript vector were obtained from Dr.Yoshimura at National Cancer Institute, Frederick, USA.
Sub-cloning of guinea pig IL-1β and MCP-1 genes into the prokaryotic expression vector
The mature peptide regions of guinea pig IL-1β and MCP-1 genes residing in pBlue Script vectors were amplified by PCR with primer sequences (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing BamHI and HindIII recognition sites to facilitate cloning. The forward and reverse primer sequences used for amplification of the IL-1β gene were 5′- TAGGATCCACGCCTGTCCCATCACGGAA-3′ and 5′- TAAAGCTTCTGGCCATTGTTATTTCCCA-3′ and for MCP1 gene were 5′- TAGGATCCCAGCCGGATGGAGTTAATAC-3′ and 5′- TAAAGCTTTTAGCTACGGTTCTTGGGGT-3′. The underlined parts of primer sequences represent the nucleotide sequences of the gene whereas 5′ overhangs (italicized) are restriction sites designed to facilitate cloning.
The conditions for PCR amplification of the IL-1β or MCP-1 genes were the same as that described for one of the guinea pig genes in our previous report [14]. PCR products that were obtained for both IL-1β and MCP-1 genes were digested with BamHI and HindIII restriction enzymes and ligated into the pET-30a(+) vector (Novagen, Madison, WI). The ligation mixtures were transformed with chemically competent Novablue cells (Novagen). Five transformants were randomly selected for plasmid DNA isolation and analyzed for the presence of inserts by restriction analysis. Bidirectional sequencing of the transformants was performed using fluorescent-labeled dideoxy nucleotide terminators with Big Dye version 3.1 and ABI 3130 xI automated sequencers (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Plasmid DNA from two of the confirmed transformants was transformed into chemically competent Rosetta 2(De3) cells (Novagen).
Expression of IL-1β and MCP-1 genes and determination of target protein solubility
The colonies were grown in 3 milliliters (ml) of LB broth containing kanamycin (15 μg/ml) and chloramphenicol (34 μg/ml) overnight at 37 °C and was added to 50 ml of identical culture medium and then cultured at 37 °C. When the OD600 of the cultures reached 0.6–0.8, protein expression was induced by adding Isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside (IPTG) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) to a final concentration of 1.0 mM. After induction with IPTG, the incubation continued for five hours at 37 °C. A small fraction of the sample was collected at different time intervals to determine the pattern of protein expression. The induced/expressed proteins were analyzed by Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) using a pre-cast Novex 10-20% Tricine gel (Invitrogen).
The cells were harvested by centrifugation and the pellet was resuspended in 5 mL lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl and 10 mM Imidazole, pH 8.0) followed by addition of lysozyme (Sigma) to 1mg/ml and incubation on ice for 30 minutes. The sample was subjected to sonication (Misonix Inc., Farmingdale, NY) at 30 W for a total of 6 times (10 seconds each time with a pause of 10 seconds). The sonicated sample was centrifuged to obtain the cleared lysate and the pellet. A fraction of the cleared lysate or pellet was analyzed on Novex 10-20% Tricine gel (Invitrogen) to determine the solubility of the target protein. Both the target proteins were obtained in the soluble form and purified under native conditions.
Protein purification for soluble proteins
The cleared lysates obtained after sonication were purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography under native conditions. In brief, 1 ml of Ni-NTA agarose resin was added to 4 ml of cleared lysate in a polypropylene column (Qiagen) and was placed on an orbital shaker at 4°C for 1 hour. After allowing the flow-through to pass, the column was equilibrated with 5 ml of lysis buffer, and was washed twice with 10 ml of wash buffer, which was followed by finally eluting the His-tagged protein with the elution buffer to the column in 0.5 ml aliquots. The eluted fractions containing the protein of interest were pooled and concentrated using Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter devices (Millipore, Billerica, MA). The protein concentrations were determined using the Protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
N-terminal sequencing of proteins
The eluted and concentrated IL-1β and MCP-1 fractions (approximately 100 μg) were digested with 3-4 units of enterokinase enzyme (Novagen) and were monitored for digestion at 6 h and 14 h. The eneterokinase digested protein products were run on Novex 10-20% tricine gels (Invitrogen). They were blotted onto PVDF membranes using the Mini-trans blot electrophoretic transfer cell apparatus (Biorad), and were then stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. The proteins of interest that appeared as bands on the membrane were excised and subjected to Edman protein sequencing method on a Procise 492 protein sequencer (Applied biosystems) at the Protein Chemistry Laboratory of Texas A&M University. The LPS contamination in the protein samples was analyzed by Toxin sensor chromogenic LAL endotoxin assay kit (Genscript, Piscataway, NJ).
Animals used in this study
Specific pathogen-free, random-bred Hartley strain guinea pigs weighing approximately 250-350g were obtained from Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc. (Wilmington, MA, USA). The animals were housed individually in polycarbonate cages in a temperature and humidity controlled environment with a 12-h light-dark cycle. All procedures were reviewed and approved by the Texas A & M University Laboratory Animal Care Committee.
Determining the biological activity of rgpIL-1 activity
The activity of rgpIL-1 was measured using a proliferation assay as described previously [25]. Briefly, non-adherent guinea pig thymocytes were obtained and purified on a nylon wool column. The cell viability was measured by Trypan blue exclusion [26]. The cells were adjusted to 5 × 105 cells/ml, seeded onto a 96-well microtitre plate (Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ), and stimulated with 5 g/ml rgpIL-1 or 5 g/ml Conconavalin A (Con A; Sigma) or a combination of both (mix of 5 g/ml rgpIL-1 and 5 g/ml Con A). The cells were incubated for 48 h at 37 C in the presence of 5% CO2. The cells were then labeled with [3H] thymidine (1 Ci/well) for the final 5 hours of incubation and harvested by a multiple automated cell harvester (Packard). The radioactivity in the collecting filter disks was measured by a Beckman scintillation counter. The counts are expressed as a stimulation index (SI), which was obtained by dividing the counts per minute (cpm) of stimulated cells by the cpm of unstimulated cells. The levels of IL-1 activity were expressed by the mean counts per minute (CPM) values ± SEM.
Determining the biological activity of rgpMCP-1
To obtain resident peritoneal macrophages, guinea pigs were euthanized by intramuscular injection of Sodium pentabarbital (Sleepaway; Fort Dodge Laboratories, IA). The peritoneal cavity was opened aseptically and flushed three to four times using a wash solution consisting of 10 U/ml heparin and 2% FBS in 1XPBS. Red blood cells were lysed using ACK lysing buffer (0.15 M NH4Cl, 1 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM Na2EDTA, pH 7.2). Macrophages were resuspended in complete media (RPMI 1640, 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 0.01 mM −ME) and allowed to adhere to tissue culture plates for 1.5 hours at 37 C in the presence of 5% CO2. Nonadherent cells in suspension were removed. Adherent cells were gently scraped, and cell viability was measured by Trypan blue exclusion [24] and adjusted to a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml to be used in the assay.
The rgpMCP-1 was serially diluted from 10 ng/ml to 20 μg/ml and added to the lower chambers of a 96-well chemotaxis plate (Corning; 5 m pore-size, PVP-free polycarbonate filter). Formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP; Sigma) was also serially diluted from 10 ng/ml to 20 μg/ml and used as a chemoattractant positive control. Adherent macrophages were added to the upper wells of the chamber and incubated for 3 h at 37 C in the presence of 5% CO2. After incubation, any cells that did not migrate from the top of the filter were scraped off. The filter was stained with Diff-Quik to ensure that no cells were left on the filter. The samples were transferred to a new 96-well plate and 5mg/ml of MTT (Sigma; 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-Yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide) was added to each sample and incubated for 4 hours at 37 C in the presence of 5% CO2. Finally, 100 l of solubilization buffer containing 20% SDS was added to each well and incubated for another 4 hours at 37 C in the presence of 5% CO2. Samples were read on an automated microtiter plate reader (Dynatech MR 5000; Molecular Dynamics, Chantilly, VA) at 540nm/690nm and average optical density at 540nm (OD 540) ± SEM was expressed.
Statistical analysis
ANOVA was used to determine statistical significances between groups at 95% confidence interval using Duncan post hoc analysis. The statistical tests were performed using SAS software (Release 8.01, SAS institute, Cary, NC)
Results
Confirmation and expression of IL-1β and MCP-1
All the five putative transformants randomly selected for the IL-1 β or MCP-1 contained the gene of interest when analyzed by restriction analysis with a recombinant percentage of 100%. The two transformants corresponding to the pET-30a(+) vector containing IL-1β or MCP-1 upon induction with IPTG resulted in the generation of proteins of interest that were visible as a 27 kDa band for IL-1 and 19 kDa for MCP-1 (Figure 1). Obviously the tags and cleavage sites that were present in the expression vector contributed to the increased size of the proteins. Unlike the rgp IL-10 and IFN-γ proteins that were obtained in the insoluble form [12, 22], target protein solubility for both IL-1 and MCP-1 proteins showed that they were obtained in the soluble form and were purified under native conditions by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using Ni-NTA columns.
Fig. 1.
Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant IL-1β and MCP-1 from each clone after IPTG induction at 2, 4, and 5 hours interval. MM, molecular weight marker; UI, uninduced samples; I, Induced samples; h, Hours of induction.
Sequencing of the proteins
Both the IL-1β and MCP-1 proteins were efficiently cleaved (Figure 2) and there was no significant difference in the extent of cleavage at 6 or 14 hours (Figure 2). The cleaved products were transferred onto the PVDF membrane by electroblotting and then stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. Bands corresponding to IL-1β and MCP-1 were excised from the PVDF membrane and when subjected to N-terminal sequencing yielded the sequences AMADIGSQPDGV and AMADIGSSQG, respectively. AMADIG refers to the part of the vector sequence that is translated along with the protein of interest. These sequences corresponded to the predicted N-terminal sequence of guinea pig IL-1β and MCP-1 based on the cDNA sequences published earlier [23,24] that confirms the identity of the purified proteins.
Fig. 2.
Cleavage of additional tags (Histidine, thrombin, S, enterokinase) from recombinant IL-1β and MCP-1 proteins. The recombinant IL-1β and MCP-1 proteins were digested with enterokinase enzyme at different time intervals for analysis to subject them to N-terminal sequencing in the next step. MM, molecular weight marker; UDIL-1β, Undigested IL-1β; D IL-1β (6h), IL-1β digested with enterokinase enzyme for 6 hours; DIL-1β (14h), IL-1β digested with enterokinase enzyme for 14 hours; DMCP-1 (6h), MCP-1 digested with enterokinase enzyme for 6 hours; DMCP-1 (14h), MCP-1 digested with enterokinase enzyme for 14 hours.
Proliferation of guinea pig thymocytes by rgpIL-1β
To determine the biological activity of rgpIL-1, the proliferative response of guinea pig thymocytes was assessed (Figure 3). In the presence of ConA, thymocyte proliferation was significantly increased by 55-fold when compared to media alone (p<0.01). When thymocytes were stimulated with IL-1 alone, proliferation was significantly higher than media alone (RPMI, 380±53.95 CPM;IL-1, 838+31.22 CPM) (p<0.01). The presence of both ConA and rgpIL-1 had a slight additive effect as thymocyte proliferation was significantly upregulated by about 60-fold. These results clearly demonstrate the biological activity of rgpIL-1.
Fig. 3.
Proliferation of thymocytes induced by rgp IL-1β. Guinea pig thymocytes (5 × 106 cells/ml) were stimulated with rgp IL-1β (5 g/ml) alone, ConA (5 g/ml) alone and rgp IL-1β (5 g/ml) with ConA (5 g/ml) together for 2 days. Cells were harvested after the addition of [3H]-thymidine 5h earlier. **, Thymocyte proliferation was significantly upregulated (P<0.01) by IL-1β and ConA, when compared with media alone.
Chemotactic activity of rgpMCP-1
To determine the chemotactic activity of rgpMCP-1, resident peritoneal guinea pig macrophages were allowed to migrate with various concentrations of the chemoattractant, f-Met-Leu-Phe, or the recombinant protein (Figure 4). The migration of macrophages was dose-dependent. Peak activity was achieved at 1.25 μg/ml for f-Met-Leu-Phe and 5 μg/ml for rgpMCP-1, while chemotactic activity declined at higher concentrations. Migratory activity was similar in response to both stimuli as no significant differences were found between groups at any of the concentrations.
Fig. 4.
Chemotactic activity of rgp MCP-1 was assessed by determining the migration of resident peritoneal macrophages to various concentrations of recombinant protein and fMLP compared to medium (RPMI) alone. Cell migration was determined using the MTT viability assay after the cells were scraped from the filter. Results are displayed as the mean ± SEM. *, Significant differences (P<0.05) were seen in migration of chemotactic agents (rgpMCP-1 & fMLP) compared with media alone.
Discussion
Although the guinea pig IL-1β sequence was reported earlier [24], it has not been expressed. This study is the first to report guinea pig IL1ß protein expression and demonstrate its biological activity. Other studies that are in progress for further functional characterization of rgpIL-1β involves in vitro assays such as its ability to induce macrophage activation (e.g., MHC class-2 expression), to overcome the arrested maturation of the M. tuberculosis containing phagosome [17, 28, 29], augmentation of T cell proliferation [30], and upregulation of IL-8 mRNA expression in the guinea pig fibroblast cell line 104C1 [31].
Although guinea pig MCP-1 has been previously expressed using the eukaryotic expression system (COS cells) [24], a disadvantage with the eukaryotic expression system is that less protein will be produced in comparison to a prokaryotic expression system [32]. Hence, expression of guinea pig MCP-1 in the prokaryotic expression system serves two important purposes. First, a large amount of protein is produced economically for downstream applications such as monoclonal antibody development, biological assays, etc [33, 34]. Second, since the protein was expressed in soluble form, it retained its biological activity which is not the case with the majority of eukaryotic proteins produced using prokaryotic expression systems [35]. Although several strategies exist to circumvent this problem [36], the approach of refolding proteins is considered to be a laborious and uneconomical process for the production of large quantities of recombinant proteins [37].
It was not apparent from the previous study whether rgpMCP-1 induced any response in resident (as opposed to exudate) peritoneal macrophages [24]. From our results, it is clear that rgpMCP-1 induces a chemotactic response by peritoneal resident macrophages. The in vivo effect of rgpMCP-1 on infiltration of macrophages in the guinea pig skin will be assessed as reported before [24]. We previously reported the in vivo effects of rgpTNF-α [38]. Future studies will focus on generation of polyclonal antibodies for both rgpIL-1β and MCP-1 and in vivo neutralization experiments involving anti-IL-1β and anti-MCP-1 will be performed in a similar manner as that done for anti-TNF-α by our group [12, 39].
Expression of recombinant proteins in soluble form is an important goal, because downstream processing of the insoluble proteins is a complex process even with established procedures. Our strategy was to clone IL-1β and MCP-1 genes into the pQE-30 vector and determine the target protein solubility. If the protein was expressed in insoluble form, our next strategy was to clone IL-1β and MCP-1 genes into appropriate vectors containing soluble fusion tags [40], cleave off those tags and obtain the soluble form of protein. Although a widely used alternative, the disadvantage with the method is that it results in low yields after cleavage and the proteins of interest may remain functionally inactive if they remain as fusion proteins [41]. Initial efforts to sub-clone the guinea pig IL-1 and MCP-1 genes into pQE-30 vector were successful, however little or no protein expression was observed after induction (data not shown). We hypothesized that the presence of rare codons in both the IL-1β and MCP-1 genes (approximately 10%) as analyzed by Graphical Codon Usage Analyzer [42] was detrimental to the expression of the proteins. Therefore, we chose the Rosetta 2(DE3) containing the pRARE plasmid that will enhance the expression of eukaryotic proteins that contain codons rarely used in E.coli. In order to determine whether the presence of rare codons affected the expression of IL-1β and MCP1 genes, we also transformed the pET-30a(+) vector construct containing the genes of interest (IL-1β and MCP-1) with BL21(DE3) cells that didn’t contain the pRARE plasmid and efficient protein expression was observed (data not shown). Thus, it appears that rare codons were not involved in the failure to express these genes in pQE-30. Some other factors may be involved in the successful expression of both the IL-1β and MCP-1 genes in the pET-30a(+) vector and their failure to express in pQE-30. These are issues worthy of further investigation.
In conclusion, we describe an efficient strategy for generating biologically active recombinant guinea pig IL-1β and MCP-1 proteins in a prokaryotic expression system which can serve as invaluable tools for the study of TB and other infectious and non-infectious diseases.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a subcontract from Colorado State University under NIH contract HHSN 266200400091c. The authors thank Dr. Teizo Yoshimura at National Cancer Institute for providing us the clones. The authors thank Dr. Larry Dangott of the Protein Chemistry Lab at Texas A & M University for successful protein sequencing.
References
- 1.W.H.O report . World Health Organization: Global Tuberculosis control. Geneva, Switzerland: 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Harrison C. Vaccines: Protecting against Tuberculosis. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2011;10:813. doi: 10.1038/nrd3588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Checkley AM, McShane H. Tuberculosis vaccines: Progress and challenges. Trends in Pharamacological Science. 2011;32:601–606. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2011.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.McMurray DN, Collins FM, Dannenberg AM, JR., Smith DW. Pathogenesis of experimental tuberculosis in animal models. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. 1996;215:157–179. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-80166-2_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McMurray DN. Disease model: pulmonary tuberculosis. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 2001;7:135–137. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4914(00)01901-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Turner OC, Basaraba RJ, Orme IM. Immunopathogensis of pulmonary granulomas in the guinea pig after infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infection and Immunity. 2003;71:864–871. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.2.864-871.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Padilla-Carlin DJ, McMurray DN, Hickey AJ. The guinea pig as a model of infectious diseases. Comparative Medicine. 2008;58:324–340. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dharmadhikari AS, Nardell EA. What animal models teach humans about tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 2008;39:503–508. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2008-0154TR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lyons MJ, Yoshimura T, McMurray DN. Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination augments interleukin-8 mRNA expression and protein production in guinea pig alveolar macrophages infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infection and Immunity. 2002;70:5471–5478. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5471-5478.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Skwor TA, Cho H, Cassidy C, Yoshimura T, McMurray DN. Recombinant guinea pig CCL5 (RANTES) differentially modulates cytokine production in alveolar and peritoneal macrophages. Journal of Leukocytic Biology. 2004;76:1229–1239. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0704414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lasco TM, Cassone L, Kamohara H, Yoshimura T, McMurray DN. Evaluating the role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in experimental pulmonary tuberculosis in the guinea pig. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2005;85:245–258. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2005.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jeevan A, McFarland CT, Yoshimura T, Skwor T, Cho H, Lasco T, D.N., McMurray DN. Production and characterization of guinea pig recombinant gamma interferon and its effect on macrophage activation. Infection and Immunity. 2006;74:213–224. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.1.213-224.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jeevan A, Yoshimura T, Ly LH, Dirisala VR, McMurray DN. Cloning of guinea pig IL-4: Reduced IL-4 mRNA after vaccination or Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2011;91:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2010.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dirisala VR, Jeevan A, Bix G, Yoshimura T, McMurray DN. Molecular cloning and expression of the IL-10 gene from guinea pigs. Gene. 2012;498:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.01.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ordway D, Palanisamy G, Henao-Tamayo M, Smith EE, Shanley C, Orme IM, Basaraba RJ. The cellular immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infecetion in the guinea pig. Journal of Immunology. 2007;179:2532–2541. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang Y, Doerfler M, Lee TC, Guillemin B, Rom WN. Mechanisms of stimulation of interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha by Mycobacterium tuberculosis components. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1993;91:2076–2083. doi: 10.1172/JCI116430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dinarello CA. Biological basis for interleukin-1 in disease. Blood. 1996;87:2095–2147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dinarello CA. Interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory diseases. Blood. 2011;117:3720–3732. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-273417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Law K, Weiden M, Harkin T, Tchou-Wong K, Chi C, Rom WN. Increased release of interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha by bronchoalveolar cells lavaged from involved sites in pulmonary tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 1996;153:799–804. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.153.2.8564135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Su WL, Perng WC, Huang CH, Yang CU, Wu CP, Chen JH. Association of reduced tumor necrosis factor alpha, gamma interferon and interleukin-1ß but increased IL-10 expression with improved chest radiography in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2011;17:223–231. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00381-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lin YG, Gong JH, Zhang M, Xue W, Barnes PF. Production of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in tuberculosis patients. Infection and Immunity. 1998;66:2319–2322. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.5.2319-2322.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Frahm M, Goswami ND, Owzar K, Hecker E, Mosher A, Cadogan E, Nahid P, Ferrari G, Stout JE. Discriminating between latent and active tuberculosis with multiple biomarker responses. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2011;91:250–256. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2011.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yoshimura T, Takeya M, Ogata H, Yamashiro S, Modi WS, Gillitzer R. Molecular cloning of the guinea pig GRO gene and its rapid expression in the tissues of lipopolysaccharide–injected guinea pigs. International Archives of Allergy and Immunology. 1999;119:101–111. doi: 10.1159/000024184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yoshimura T. cDNA cloning of guinea pig monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and expression of the recombinant protein. Journal of Immunology. 1993;150:5025–5032. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stošić-Grujičić S, Simić MM. Modulation of interleukin 1 production by activated macrophages: In vitro action of hydrocortisone, colchicin and cytochalasin B. Cellular Immunology. 1982;69:235–247. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(82)90070-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hansen MB, Nielsen SE, Berg K. Re-examination and further development of a precise and rapid dye method for measuring cell growth/cell kill. Journal of Immunological Methods. 1989;119:203–210. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(89)90397-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fremond CM, Togbe D, Doz E, Rose S, Vasseur V, Maillet I, Jacobs M, Ryffel B, Quesniaux VF. IL-1 receptor-mediated signal is an essential component of MyD88-dependent innate response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Journal of Immunology. 2007;179:1178–1189. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.2.1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Master SS, Rampini SK, Davis AS, Keller C, Ehlers S, Springer B, Timmings GS, Sander P, Deretic V. Mycobacterium tuberculosis prevents inflammasome activation. Cell Host & Microbe. 2008;3:224–232. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bonilla DL, Fan YY, Chapkin RS, McMurray DN. Transgenic mice enriched in Omega-3 fatty acids are more susceptible to pulmonary tuberculosis: impaired resistance to tuberculosis in fat-1 mice. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2010;201:399–408. doi: 10.1086/650344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ben-Sasson SZ, Hu-Li J, Quiel J, Cauchetaux S, Ratner M, Shapira I, Dinarello CA, Paul WE. IL-1 acts directly on CD4 T cells to enhance their antigen-driven expansion and differentiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:7119–7124. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902745106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shapiro L, Panayotatos N, Meydani SN, Wu D, Dinarello CA. Ciliary neurotrophic factor combined with soluble receptor inhibits synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines and prostaglandin-E2 in vitro. Experimental Cell Research. 1994;215:51–56. doi: 10.1006/excr.1994.1313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Merten O-W, Mattanovish D, Lang C, Larsson G, Neubaeur P, Porro D, Postma P, de Mattos JT, de JT, Cole JA. Recombinant protein production with prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Kluwer Academic Publishers; Dordrecht, Netherlands: 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Braun P, LaBaer J. High throughput protein production for functional proteomics. Trends in Biotechnology. 2003;21:383–388. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00189-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tegel H, Ottosson J, Hober S. Enhancing the protein production levels in Escherichia coli with a strong promoter. FEBS Journal. 2011;278:729–739. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07991.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sahdev S, Khattar SK, Saini KS. Production of active eukaryotic proteins through bacterial expression systems: a review of the existing biotechnology strategies. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 2008;307:249–264. doi: 10.1007/s11010-007-9603-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tsumoto K, Ejima D, Kumagai I, Arakawa T. Practical considerations in refolding proteins from inclusion bodies. Protein Expression and Purification. 2003;28:1–8. doi: 10.1016/s1046-5928(02)00641-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dill KA, Ozkan SB, Weikl TR, Chodera JD, Voelz VA. The protein folding problem: when will it be solved? Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2007;17:342–346. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kramp JC, McMurray DN, Formichella C, Jeevan A. The in vivo immunomodulatory effect of recombinant tumor necrosis factor-alpha in guinea pigs vaccinated with Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guérin. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 2011;165:110–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04406.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ly LH, Jeevan A, McMurray DN. Neutralization of TNFα alters inflammation in guinea pig tuberculous pleuritis. Microbes and Infection. 2009;11:680–688. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2009.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Esposito D, Chatterjee DK. Enhancement of soluble protein expression through the use of fusion tags. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2006;17:353–358. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Phizicky E, Bastiaens PIH, Zhu H, Snyder M, Fileds S. Protein analysis on a proteomic scale. Nature. 2003;422:208–215. doi: 10.1038/nature01512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fuhrmann M, Hausherr A, Ferbitz L, Schödl T, Heitzer M, Hegemann P. Monitoring dynamic expression of nuclear genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by using a synthetic luciferase reporter gene. Plant Molecular Biology. 2004;55:869–881. doi: 10.1007/s11103-004-2150-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




