Skip to main content
Autoimmune Diseases logoLink to Autoimmune Diseases
. 2013 Feb 24;2013:761046. doi: 10.1155/2013/761046

Genome-Wide Association Study of Antiphospholipid Antibodies

M Ilyas Kamboh 1,*, Xingbin Wang 1, Amy H Kao 2, Michael M Barmada 1, Ann Clarke 3, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman 4, Susan Manzi 2, F Yesim Demirci 1
PMCID: PMC3595708  PMID: 23509613

Abstract

Background. The persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) may lead to the development of primary or secondary antiphospholipid syndrome. Although the genetic basis of APA has been suggested, the identity of the underlying genes is largely unknown. In this study, we have performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in an effort to identify susceptibility loci/genes for three main APA: anticardiolipin antibodies (ACL), lupus anticoagulant (LAC), and anti-β 2 glycoprotein I antibodies (anti-β 2GPI). Methods. DNA samples were genotyped using the Affymetrix 6.0 array containing 906,600 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Association of SNPs with the antibody status (positive/negative) was tested using logistic regression under the additive model. Results. We have identified a number of suggestive novel loci with P < E − 05. Although they do not meet the conservative threshold of genome-wide significance, many of the suggestive loci are potential candidates for the production of APA. We have replicated the previously reported associations of HLA genes and APOH with APA but these were not the top loci. Conclusions. We have identified a number of suggestive novel loci for APA that will stimulate follow-up studies in independent and larger samples to replicate our findings.

1. Introduction

Antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) are a heterogeneous group of antibodies that are detected in a variety of conditions, including primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [1]. The term antiphospholipid antibodies is a misnomer as APA present in autoimmune disease, like SLE, do not bind to phospholipids but recognize phospholipid-binding proteins [2]. Patients with persistent APA who develop pregnancy complications or thrombosis are considered to have primary APS and those who develop these complications in the presence of autoimmune disease are classified having secondary APS. Since the definition of APS is not limited to a single APA assay, it is required to measure more than one APA. Indeed, currently recognized laboratory criteria for APS include having one or more of three APA, including anticardiolipin antibodies (ACL), lupus anticoagulant (LAC), or anti-β 2 glycoprotein I antibodies (anti-β 2GPI) in conjunction with the presence of thrombosis or pregnancy loss [3].

Although the genetic basis of APA [4] and APS [5] has been suggested, the underlying genetic factors have not been clearly established. Understanding the genetic bases of various APA may help to delineate the mechanisms for APS. The objective of this study was to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in an effort to identify loci/genes for the three main APA, namely, ACL, LAC, and anti-β 2GPI.

2. Subjects and Methods

2.1. Subjects

A subset of individuals from our larger GWAS of SLE (unpublished data) that had the ACL (n = 670), LAC (n = 708), and anti-β 2GPI (n = 496) measurements available were used in this study. All individuals were women of European ancestry. The study participants included both SLE cases and controls and their characteristics are given in Table 1. Our controls were apparently healthy individuals that were recruited from blood bank. We measured APA in our controls but they were not characterized for primary APS due to our study design that is focused on identifying genes for SLE and APA. Furthermore, there were only 28 individuals with APS, and this small number was not considered to be appropriate for a GWAS analysis. All subjects provided written informed consent and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Table 1.

Characteristics of study participants with three antiphospholipid antibodies in the GWAS dataset*.

ACL LAC Anti-β 2GPI
Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive Negative
(n = 183) (n = 487) (n = 127) (n = 581) (n = 136) (n = 360)
Mean age ± SD 46.92 ± 11.41 46.19 ± 10.85 45.64 ± 11.35 46.40 ± 11.36 45.91 ± 10.68 46.79 ± 11.18
SLE cases (%) 58.5 58.1 70.8 56.3 71.3 51.9
Controls (%) 41.5 41.9 29.2 43.7 28.7 48.1

*ACL: anticardiolipin antibodies; LAC: lupus anticoagulant; Anti-β 2GPI: anti-β 2 glycoprotein I antibodies.

2.2. Antiphospholipid Antibodies

The presence of ACL (IgG > 15 GPL units, IgM > 10 MPL units, IncStar, Stillwater, MN, USA), LAC (partial thromboplastin time or Russell's viper venon time with mix) and anti-β 2GPI (QUANTA Lite β 2GPI screen, INOVA Diagnostics, Inc. San Diego, CA, USA) was tested in sera or plasma obtained from the study subjects. The three APA (ACL, LAC, and anti-β 2GPI) were classified into antibody-positive and antibody-negative groups based on manufacturer's protocols.

2.3. Genotyping and Quality Control (QC)

DNA samples were genotyped using the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 containing 906,600 SNPs at Expression Analysis, Durham, NC, USA. All samples used in this study passed strict quality control measurements in our larger GWAS. Exclusion criteria included samples with poor performance (<95% average call rate across the array), poorly performing markers (44,592 with <95% call rate across all samples genotyped), and markers with significant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P ≤ 1E − 06) and with low minor allele frequency (MAF <0.01). Population stratification analysis was conducted using a multidimensional scaling method implemented in PLINK. SNPs falling within the genomic regions with abnormal linkage disequilibrium patterns and structural variations (hg18; chr2: 130–140 Mb, chr6: 24–36 Mb, chr8: 8–12 Mb, chr11: 42–58 Mb, and chr17: 40–43 Mb) were excluded from the principal component (PC) analysis but were included in subsequent association analysis. First 4 components were determined to be relevant for the determination of population origin based on visual examination of PC plots and were used as covariates in the association statistics.

2.4. Association Analysis

The three APA (ACL, LAC, and anti-β 2GPI) were classified into antibody-positive and antibody-negative groups based on manufacturer's protocols. Association of SNPs with the antibody status was tested using logistic regression under the additive model. Considering the effect of SNPs on the antibody status may be confounded by the disease status (SLE) and other demographic variables (age, BMI, smoking), we used the stepwise regression method to select the most parsimonious set of covariates for each dependent variable. The analysis for each antibody was adjusted for the disease status (SLE) and the first four principal components. In addition, the ACL and LAC analyses were adjusted for smoking and BMI, respectively. R and/or PLINK statistical software programs were used for all analyses performed for this study.

3. Results

3.1. Quantile-Quantile Plots of the GWAS Data

The genome-wide association analysis was performed on 670 individuals with ACL, 708 individuals with LAC and 496 individuals with anti-β 2GPI (Table 1) who were genotyped using the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0. Figure 1 shows the quantile-quantile plots for comparisons of observed and expected P values distribution for ACL, LAC, and anti-β 2GPI. For all three APA, the distribution of observed P values conformed to the null distribution until the tail of the distribution where it deviated, indicating no evidence of significant population stratification but evidence of genetic association.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Quantile-quantile plots of the observed versus the expected P values for ACL, LAC, and Anti-β 2GPI.

3.2. Association with Anticardiolipin Antibodies (ACL)

Figure 2 shows the genome-wide P values for ACL in a Manhattan plot and the top loci with P < 1E − 04 are presented in Table 2. Three top SNPs with P < 1E − 05 were observed. The most significant SNP, rs6889746 (P = 6.02E − 06), was located upstream of PELO (Pelota homolog) on chromosome 5q11.2. The next top SNP, rs6681460 (P = 6.98E − 06), was present in SGIP1 (SH3-domain GRB2-like-intercation protein1) on chromosome 1p31.3. There was a total of 28 SNPs in this region with P < 1E − 03. The next top SNP, rs12204683 (P = 7.02E − 06), resided downstream of LCA5 on chromosome 6q14.1.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Manhattan plot showing the genome-wide association P values with anticardiolipin antibodies (ACL). Blue line indicates P = 1E − 04.

Table 2.

Genetic loci associated with the occurrence of ACL with P < 1E − 04*.

CHR Gene Lead SNP BP Total SNPs MAF OR P
Negative Positive
5 PELO rs6889746 51742663 3 0.3534 0.5 1.776 6.02E − 06
1 SGIP1 rs6681460 66895645 28 0.3755 0.5168 1.827 6.98E − 06
6 LCA5 rs12204683 80212978 4 0.2378 0.3701 1.877 7.02E − 06
4 MIR4275 rs17642174 28160435 6 0.1355 0.2346 2.021 1.42E − 05
4 C4orf37 rs13134014 99323902 21 0.1517 0.2542 1.928 1.76E − 05
7 BZW2 rs6961256 16697717 3 0.01261 0.05587 5.214 1.96E − 05
2 FAM49A rs6753768 16483918 11 0.2836 0.1648 0.5016 2.37E − 05
4 MAD2L1 rs10518344 1.21E + 08 3 0.05136 0.1178 2.696 2.77E − 05
11 KIRREL3 rs1793667 1.26E + 08 1 0.2789 0.3966 1.781 2.89E − 05
14 YLPM1 rs2241275 74321193 7 0.435 0.5587 1.754 3.06E − 05
14 PROX2 rs4899536 74386367 2 0.4331 0.5559 1.752 3.28E − 05
2 ATL2 rs6749177 38531205 11 0.4958 0.3659 0.576 3.77E − 05
17 PRPSAP1 rs11077813 71848140 1 0.2704 0.1564 0.5072 3.82E − 05
9 TTLL11 rs10985483 1.24E + 08 4 0.3703 0.25 0.5571 4.09E − 05
8 ZBTB10 rs406629 81620942 6 0.3795 0.2599 0.5501 4.26E − 05
21 LINC00317 rs2827107 22175926 3 0.2128 0.3156 1.847 5.63E − 05
7 NUPL2 rs10232205 23197079 1 0.09244 0.02793 0.2465 6.22E − 05
1 DUSP10 rs11118750 2.2E + 08 4 0.2174 0.3287 1.753 6.88E − 05
15 MCTP2 rs1863095 92917093 1 0.3224 0.4511 1.665 6.90E − 05
17 SHPK rs222790 3478239 1 0.2051 0.3097 1.793 7.30E − 05
6 KHDRBS2 rs2752976 63486388 11 0.431 0.5447 1.688 7.88E − 05
5 GLRA1 rs154111 1.51E + 08 14 0.4569 0.3399 0.5875 7.91E − 05
9 MIR548AA1 rs4836873 1.24E + 08 4 0.3651 0.2514 0.5746 8.29E − 05
1 LOC100505918 rs16860501 1.67E + 08 1 0.09119 0.1648 2.116 8.89E − 05
19 OR7A10 rs4808564 14825095 1 0.05126 0.1117 2.449 8.91E − 05
9 C9orf46 rs4742085 5340548 2 0.3501 0.4678 1.696 9.02E − 05
9 PTPRD rs2484741 10477877 7 0.2977 0.1983 0.5439 9.79E − 05
16 PDXDC1 rs3198697 15037441 1 0.3658 0.4859 1.646 9.83E − 05

*CHR: chromosome; Gene: a plausible biological candidate gene in the locus or the nearest annotated gene to the lead SNP; Lead SNP: most significant SNP in the gene region; BP: base-pair position of the lead SNP; Total SNPs: total number of SNPs with P < 1E − 03 in the gene region; MAF: minor allele frequencies in antibody-negative and antibody-positive groups; OR: odds ratio; P: P-values for the test.

3.3. Association with Lupus Anticoagulant (LAC)

The Manhattan plot for LAC is shown in Figure 3 and the top hits with P < 1E − 04 are given in Table 3. The most significant SNP, rs1978968, was observed in MICAL3 on chromosome 22q11.21 (P = 2.21E − 06) and there were additional 7 significant SNPs in this region with P < 1E − 03. The next significant SNP was observed on chromosome 2p12 in FAM176A (rs17011455, P = 4.70E − 06). However, no other SNP with P < 1E − 03 was observed in this region. The third significant SNP, rs17791782, was observed in DSTN on chromosome 20p12.1 (P = 6.54E − 06).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Manhattan plot showing the genome-wide association P values with lupus anticoagulant (LAC). Blue line indicates P = 1E − 04.

Table 3.

Genetic loci associated with the occurrence of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) with P < 1E − 04*.

CHR Gene Lead SNP BP Total SNPs MAF OR P
Negative Positive
22 MICAL3 rs1978968 16828113 8 0.2144 0.3553 2.235 2.21E − 06
2 FAM176A rs17011455 75643997 1 0.01661 0.06967 5.211 4.70E − 06
20 DSTN rs17791782 17514069 2 0.07867 0.1721 2.628 6.54E − 06
6 SUPT3H rs9472374 44904278 1 0.01957 0.07083 4.77 1.14E − 05
3 LRIG1 rs4549225 66850149 10 0.3735 0.5246 1.867 1.54E − 05
1 SMYD3 rs7527610 2.45E + 08 2 0.005236 0.04098 10.19 1.77E − 05
14 PELI2 rs754314 55822350 8 0.04833 0.1167 3.111 2.13E − 05
20 BFSP1 rs16999416 17489830 1 0.08494 0.1777 2.412 2.32E − 05
16 NDRG4 rs11862356 57067820 1 0.05846 0.1393 2.745 2.40E − 05
17 CDRT15P1 rs7208809 13678048 2 0.06806 0.1516 2.573 2.62E − 05
22 FAM19A5 rs9615320 47219591 2 0.1065 0.2008 2.333 3.07E − 05
6 SNRNP48 rs17398435 7549105 1 0.06392 0.1446 2.589 3.45E − 05
14 OTX2 rs12897597 56314078 1 0.1531 0.2667 2.097 3.53E − 05
17 RBFOX3 rs16972153 74719776 1 0.04974 0.1148 2.925 3.59E − 05
16 MAF rs9935211 78440577 5 0.05467 0.1311 2.692 4.18E − 05
5 YTHDC2 rs6865651 1.13E + 08 2 0.1848 0.3058 2.005 4.32E − 05
10 LDB3 rs4934256 88490345 2 0.05507 0.123 2.783 4.68E − 05
9 KLF4 rs1888617 1.1E + 08 1 0.2657 0.4009 1.935 4.92E − 05
10 TACC2 rs12773310 1.24E + 08 6 0.3536 0.219 0.4945 5.19E − 05
6 LY86 rs9328374 6536628 1 0.1875 0.307 1.989 5.40E − 05
9 ZCCHC7 rs7031314 37366122 3 0.2204 0.3375 1.924 5.90E − 05
3 SETD5 rs17050346 9456593 5 0.01926 0.06967 4.047 6.34E − 05
4 COL25A1 rs13104799 1.1E + 08 6 0.2245 0.1107 0.4106 6.68E − 05
7 C7orf58 rs12537243 1.2E + 08 1 0.09178 0.1736 2.289 7.22E − 05
4 RBM46 rs7687314 1.56E + 08 6 0.4474 0.5902 1.808 7.25E − 05
9 LOC100506710 rs10973184 37056617 1 0.09895 0.1885 2.252 7.33E − 05
3 EPHA6 rs4318565 97564200 1 0.03369 0.08607 3.32 7.77E − 05
11 LOC283143 rs1393275 1.15E + 08 3 0.05026 0.1261 2.595 7.90E − 05
18 MAPRE2 rs573269 30863716 1 0.3129 0.4385 1.816 8.05E − 05
13 FARP1 rs285031 97584032 1 0.1489 0.2438 2.092 8.11E − 05
10 ANXA2P3 rs10822492 66751936 15 0.3439 0.219 0.5075 8.32E − 05
6 TBCC rs11759402 42831787 4 0.1658 0.2686 1.945 8.32E − 05
4 LNX1 rs6831173 54085908 4 0.1337 0.2377 1.962 8.80E − 05
4 SLC7A11 rs10440463 1.39E + 08 3 0.2073 0.3238 1.88 8.85E − 05
1 HHAT rs1028383 2.09E + 08 1 0.2248 0.3475 1.882 9.29E − 05
11 WT1 rs2207549 32325033 2 0.4202 0.2833 0.5274 9.37E − 05
4 FAM198B rs17036867 1.59E + 08 12 0.02747 0.08621 3.54 9.54E − 05

*CHR: chromosome; Gene: a plausible biological candidate gene in the locus or the nearest annotated gene to the lead SNP; Lead SNP: most significant SNP in the gene region; BP: base-pair position of the lead SNP; Total SNPs: total number of SNPs with P < 1E − 03 in the gene region; MAF: minor allele frequencies in antibody-negative and antibody-positive groups; OR: odds ratio; P: P-values for the test.

3.4. Association with Anti-β 2 Glycoprotein I Antibodies (Anti-β 2GPI)

Five loci on four chromosomes were observed at P < 1E − 05 for association with anti-β 2GPI (Figure 4, Table 4). The top SNP (rs10492418) at P = 2.05E − 06 was observed on chromosome 13q33.3 in MYO16. This chromosome also harbors another locus for anti-β 2GPI at 13q14.11 (rs9315762, P = 6.68E − 06), near a region expressing long intergenic nonprotein coding RNAs. The second most significant SNP, rs11975235, was observed in PDE1C on chromosome 7p14.3 (P = 2.88E − 06). The third most significant SNP was observed upstream of TANK on chromosome 2q24.2 (rs2357982, P = 3.38E − 06) that also harbored 12 additional significant SNPs with P < 1E − 03.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Manhattan plot showing the genome-wide association P values with anti-β 2 glycoprotein I antibodies (Anti-β 2GPI). Blue line indicates P = 1E − 04.

Table 4.

Genetic loci associated with the occurrence of anti-β 2GPI antibodies with P < 1E − 04*.

CHR Gene Lead SNP BP Total SNPs MAF OR P
Negative Positive
13 MYO16 rs10492418 108178727 5 0.4292 0.6016 2.172 2.05E − 06
7 PDE1C rs11975235 32156065 4 0.4843 0.311 0.4675 2.88E − 06
2 TANK rs2357982 161594349 13 0.2359 0.3885 2.189 3.38E − 06
13 FLJ42392 rs9315762 39639907 2 0.1535 0.2901 2.255 6.68E − 06
20 MACROD2 rs6080100 15951406 7 0.2655 0.4275 2.086 6.86E − 06
17 CAMKK1 rs758642 3733656 1 0.3314 0.4837 2.038 1.23E − 05
14 ITPK1 rs8021497 92637371 6 0.2059 0.3508 2.101 1.26E − 05
2 SESTD1 rs10186547 179921914 2 0.3853 0.5391 2.009 1.56E − 05
10 CACNB2 rs12356676 18687510 6 0.2587 0.3943 2.134 1.80E − 05
18 LRRC30 rs9965173 7201755 4 0.07887 0.1718 2.647 2.59E − 05
3 PEX5L rs9856007 181225431 3 0.2514 0.3817 1.976 3.68E − 05
11 TMEM45B rs10894119 129081436 1 0.1835 0.293 2.168 4.05E − 05
10 SFTA1P rs1000039 10597879 1 0.02254 0.08779 4.19 4.13E − 05
9 OR1J1 rs2778636 124270913 2 0.2641 0.3931 1.955 4.43E − 05
5 RAPGEF6 rs17671387 130911895 1 0.04507 0.1183 3.186 4.71E − 05
2 GMCL1 rs4241261 69917164 3 0.4761 0.3308 0.5278 4.93E − 05
14 C14orf101 rs7153196 56256660 2 0.362 0.229 0.4996 5.58E − 05
9 WNK2 rs10821084 94991443 1 0.07627 0.1718 2.425 6.33E − 05
10 SLC16A9 rs7082987 61007793 1 0.3663 0.2317 0.4886 6.46E − 05
4 GDEP rs11730315 81020089 2 0.1648 0.2829 2.075 7.24E − 05
4 ARHGAP24 rs17010960 86938938 2 0.02254 0.07634 4.326 7.85E − 05
13 HTR2A rs582385 46343995 4 0.1624 0.2824 2.02 8.09E − 05
15 FMN1 rs2444955 31199305 2 0.2211 0.355 1.974 8.10E − 05
5 CARTPT rs16869487 70976850 1 0.02841 0.09542 3.602 8.59E − 05
2 NEU2 rs11695991 233608333 1 0.0169 0.0687 4.802 8.63E − 05
17 CA10 rs203076 47354484 7 0.2944 0.1603 0.4729 8.70E − 05
9 C9orf135 rs1389124 71669176 3 0.09943 0.1985 2.286 9.23E − 05
20 SMOX rs1764996 4070805 2 0.02817 0.07634 4.014 9.93E − 05

*CHR: chromosome; Gene: a plausible biological candidate gene in the locus or the nearest annotated gene to the lead SNP; Lead SNP: most significant SNP in the gene region; BP: base-pair position of the lead SNP; Total SNPs: total number of SNPs with P < 1E − 03 in the gene region; MAF: minor allele frequencies in antibody-negative and antibody-positive groups; OR: odds ratio; P: P-values for the test.

3.5. Association with Presence of Two or More Antibodies

In addition to the single-antibody analyses described above, we also performed an association analysis between individuals who were positive for two or more antibodies (n = 100) versus individuals who were negative for all three antibodies (n = 227). Table 5 shows the results of top loci with P < 1E − 04. Interestingly, five of these loci (SESTD1, CACNB2, TANK, TMEM45B, and FMN1) overlapped with those observed in the anti-β 2GPI analysis (see Table 4) and two (DSTN and BFSP1) overlapped with those observed in the LAC analysis (see Table 3). Although the most significant locus, DYNLRB2 (P = 1.44E − 06), was not among the top loci detected in any of the single-antibody analyses, the second most significant locus, SESTD1 (P = 6.08E − 06), also showed association with anti-β 2GPI.

Table 5.

Genetic loci associated with the occurrence of two or more antiphospholipid antibodies (ACL, LAC, or Anti-β 2GPI) with P < 1E − 04*.

CHR Gene Lead SNP BP Total SNPs MAF OR P
Negative Positive
16 DYNLRB2 rs8060581 78750106 6 0.02466 0.1406 6.714 1.44E − 06
2 SESTD1 rs13403289 179924976 2 0.3857 0.5833 2.423 6.08E − 06
1 DNAH14 rs3913653 223603694 11 0.543 0.3421 0.43 1.09E − 05
10 CACNB2 rs10828616 18710023 6 0.2175 0.3698 2.538 1.11E − 05
18 EPB41L3 rs7238186 5469093 2 0.213 0.3854 2.327 2.61E − 05
1 MAGI3 rs11102625 113750976 5 0.4355 0.6146 2.298 2.75E − 05
2 TANK rs13010671 161593338 5 0.07442 0.1882 3.437 3.17E − 05
7 CNTNAP2 rs12113442 145329124 1 0.1054 0.2188 2.938 3.43E − 05
18 ZNF519 rs8093228 13989380 4 0.2152 0.3646 2.326 4.85E − 05
3 FAM198A rs7624799 43020807 3 0.1592 0.2969 2.466 5.00E − 05
20 DSTN rs17791782 17514069 2 0.07883 0.1927 3.086 5.06E − 05
20 BFSP1 rs16999416 17489830 1 0.08371 0.2031 2.93 5.63E − 05
13 ANKRD20A9P rs7319595 18392986 1 0.3484 0.5213 2.337 5.75E − 05
15 TLE3 rs10518889 68337482 4 0.2838 0.4427 2.231 6.17E − 05
22 CLTCL1 rs8135222 17672446 1 0.1749 0.3281 2.293 6.19E − 05
11 TMEM45B rs10894119 129081436 1 0.1789 0.3158 2.432 6.25E − 05
1 GADD45A rs787480 67868460 1 0.2207 0.08854 0.3088 6.57E − 05
20 SPTLC3 rs6105044 13065747 2 0.352 0.1979 0.4138 7.08E − 05
6 HIVEP1 rs6908010 12325985 2 0.4753 0.3073 0.4688 7.11E − 05
7 CUX1 rs427534 101673424 3 0.4439 0.2656 0.4569 7.28E − 05
10 MSMB rs7094791 51229942 1 0.3857 0.2396 0.4081 7.35E − 05
8 TPD52 rs10090469 81396522 1 0.1099 0.2292 2.668 7.43E − 05
14 LOC100506433 rs698322 47597316 1 0.3914 0.2344 0.4277 7.58E − 05
6 MMS22L rs1206164 97703068 1 0.2511 0.4219 2.212 8.26E − 05
12 CDK17 rs11108526 95379901 2 0.02691 0.08333 5.95 8.40E − 05
11 PDGFD rs4754095 103278377 3 0.2851 0.1436 0.3771 8.83E − 05
15 FMN1 rs2444955 31199305 2 0.1951 0.3474 2.408 8.89E − 05
10 SORCS1 rs4918273 108715485 11 0.3597 0.5319 2.064 8.92E − 05

*CHR: chromosome; Gene: a plausible biological candidate gene in the locus or the nearest annotated gene to the lead SNP; Lead SNP: most significant SNP in the gene region; BP: base-pair position of the lead SNP; Total SNPs: total number of SNPs with P < 1E − 03 in the gene region; MAF: minor allele frequencies in antibody-negative (negative for ALC, ACL and anti-β 2GPI) and antibody-positive (positive for at least two of ALC, ACL or anti-β 2GPI) groups; OR: odds ratio; P: P-values for the test.

3.6. Association of Extended Major Histocompatibility Complex (xMHC) Region and Apolipoprotein H (APOH) with APA

Previously, several studies have reported genetic association of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes located at the MHC locus on chromosome 6p21 with the presence of APA [6]. Likewise, since β 2GPI is the main target antigen for APA, genetic variation in its gene, APOH, is expected to be associated with the occurrence of APA. Although no SNPs from either the HLA genes or APOH were among the top GWAS SNPs with P < 1E − 04 (Tables 25), the xMHC region revealed 104, 191, and 108 significant SNPs (P < 0.05) to be associated with ACL, LAC, and anti-β 2GPI, respectively. Table 6 lists significant SNPs with P < 0.01 in the MHC region for the three APA examined. Most significant SNPs were observed in or near HLA-DPB1, HLA-DPB2, HLA-DPA1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQA2, and HLA-DMA. Noteworthy, some SNPs were associated with more than one APA. For example, among the SNPs located upstream of HLA-DQA2, rs9275765 and rs9275772 were associated with LAC (P = 7.86E − 04) and anti-β 2GPI (P = 3.15E − 03), rs9275793 with LAC (P = 8.84E − 04) and anti-β 2GPI (P = 3.10E − 03), and rs9276298 with LAC (P = 1.33E − 03) and anti-β 2GPI (P = 5.23E − 03). Likewise, rs2395357 near HLA-DPB2 showed association with ACL (P = 4.34E − 04) and LAC (P = 1.09E − 02) and rs11539216 in HLA-DMA with ACL (P = 9.96E − 04) and LAC (P = 9.29E − 03). Of the 21 QC-passed SNPs present in or near APOH, six revealed nominal associations with anti-β 2GPI, and the Trp316Ser variant (rs1801690) was the most significant SNP (P = 3.12E − 03) (Table 7). Two additional SNPs also showed nominal associations with LAC (P = 0.026, 0.027).

Table 6.

Significant SNPs with P < 0.01 in the MHC region on chromosome 6 for ACL, LAC, and Anti-β 2GP1*.

Gene SNP P
ACL

HLA-DPB1 rs3128918 0.00028
HLA-DPB2 rs2395357 0.00043
HLA-DMA rs11539216 0.00099
HLA-DQB2 rs10484564 0.00536
GNL1 rs9295888 0.00758
GNL1 rs9295873 0.00794
HLA-DOA rs4713603 0.0081
RPP21 rs1548515 0.00842
GNL1 rs9461607 0.00863
GNL1 rs17411480 0.00863
RPP21 rs9261821 0.00863
RPP21 rs9261850 0.00863
RPP21 rs9261854 0.00863
RPP21 rs9261855 0.00863
RPP21 rs1548513 0.00863
RPP21 rs9261925 0.00863
RPP21 rs9261926 0.00863
BRD2 rs17840186 0.00939
RPP21 rs9261799 0.00955

LAC

TAP2 rs1044043 0.00029
HLA-DQA1 rs642093 0.00032
AIF1 rs2736177 0.00041
HLA-DQA2 rs9275765 0.00078
HLA-DQA2 rs9275772 0.00078
HLA-DQA2 rs9275793 0.00088
HLA-DQA1 rs9272346 0.00130
HLA-DQA2 rs9276298 0.00133
HLA-DQA1 rs9272219 0.00167
C6orf10 rs3129934 0.00168
HLA-DQA1 rs9272535 0.00179
HLA-DRB1 rs674313 0.00215
HLA-DRB1 rs502771 0.00227
HLA-DRB1 rs9270986 0.00250
AIF1 rs2857597 0.00257
HCG26 rs2516516 0.00282
HLA-DRB1 rs615672 0.00295
HLA-DRB1 rs502055 0.00300
HLA-DQA1 rs9272723 0.00329
LOC100294145 rs9276915 0.00352
C6orf10 rs2894254 0.00372
UBD rs9368606 0.00403
C6orf10 rs3129900 0.00458
MCCD1 rs2734573 0.00553
PRRC2A rs1046080 0.00618
C6orf10 rs7767325 0.00623
C6orf15 rs2517448 0.00627
C6orf10 rs3132928 0.00640
HLA-H rs3132722 0.00675
HLA-DQB2 rs2857210 0.00685
HLA-DRA rs3129868 0.00731
ATP6V1G2-DDX39B/DDX39B rs933208 0.00740
NFKBIL1 rs2857605 0.00755
TRIM26 rs3132671 0.00757
HLA-DQB1 rs3129716 0.00770
MSH5/MSH5-C6orf26 rs3131379 0.00849
MSH5/MSH5-C6orf26 rs3130484 0.00901
PSMB9 rs9276832 0.00907
BTNL2 rs2213581 0.00922
HLA-DMA rs11539216 0.00929
ATP6V1G2-DDX39B/DDX39B rs3093978 0.00957
C6orf10 rs2143461 0.00986
TUBB rs3095330 0.00990
LOC100294145 rs4959119 0.00992
TRIM26 rs2517611 0.00993

Anti-β 2GPI

HLA-DPB2 rs9277916 0.00147
HLA-DQA2 rs9275793 0.00310
HLA-DQA2 rs9275765 0.00315
HLA-DQA2 rs9275772 0.00315
HLA-DPA1 rs3130182 0.00331
HLA-DQB1 rs9469220 0.00372
HLA-DPB2 rs4711314 0.00378
HLA-DQA2 rs2647089 0.00463
HLA-DQA2 rs9276298 0.00523
HLA-DQB1 rs9275356 0.00526
HLA-DQA2 rs17615250 0.00710
HLA-DQA2 rs9275618 0.00807

*ACL: anticardiolipin antibodies; LAC: lupus anticoagulant; Anti-β 2GPI: anti-β 2 glycoprotein I antibodies; Gene: a plausible biological candidate gene in the locus or the nearest annotated gene to the SNP; SNP: single-nucleotide polymorphism; P: P-values for the test.

Table 7.

Odds ratios and P-values for the association analysis of APOH SNPs on chromosome 17 with ACL, LAC, and anti-β 2GPI*.

SNP BP ACL LAC Anti-β 2GPI
OR P OR P OR P
rs1801690 61638747 0.7655 0.4048 0.6444 0.2614 2.461 0.003122
rs17769836 61663751 0.8968 0.4457 1.004 0.9821 0.5978 0.004849
rs2873966 61642435 0.9519 0.7168 0.9858 0.9262 0.6224 0.005407
rs7215391 61662484 0.8932 0.4391 0.984 0.9227 0.6146 0.008069
rs8073418 61678134 0.9639 0.7759 0.8949 0.455 0.6661 0.01061
rs8064837 61673165 0.9833 0.8915 1.011 0.9388 1.404 0.02235
rs10491174 61685021 1.017 0.9335 0.765 0.2665 1.487 0.07256
rs2215413 61679959 0.9418 0.6397 0.842 0.2435 0.829 0.221
rs16958979 61654321 0.8586 0.5569 0.4332 0.02739 1.375 0.2253
rs8178822 61655991 0.8748 0.6127 0.407 0.0258 1.379 0.2345
rs12452959 61635526 0.8991 0.5748 1.196 0.3965 1.275 0.2541
rs4791079 61640002 1.128 0.3573 1.206 0.2028 1.181 0.2802
rs3176975 61641219 0.9723 0.8552 0.9923 0.9649 1.209 0.2858
rs8066294 61673500 1.094 0.5597 1.014 0.9365 1.162 0.3981
rs17763430 61635203 0.998 0.9904 0.8987 0.5811 0.8448 0.4051
rs17690171 61633319 0.9893 0.9435 1.172 0.3479 1.141 0.4528
rs16959003 61671199 1.105 0.6095 0.8378 0.4548 1.14 0.5639
rs735866 61670208 1.206 0.3459 0.8419 0.4765 1.117 0.642
rs7208089 61689374 1.091 0.5465 0.7956 0.1906 1.08 0.6476
rs7222710 61630703 1.089 0.5011 1.016 0.9143 0.942 0.6896
rs6933 61638692 1.126 0.3408 1.068 0.6431 1.02 0.8948

*APOH: apolipoprotein H; SNP: single-nucleotide polymorphism; BP: base-pair position; OR: odds ratio; P: P-values. ACL: anticardiolipin antibodies; LAC: lupus anticoagulant; Anti-β 2GPI: anti-β 2 glycoprotein I antibodies.

4. Discussion

The persistent presence of APA, such as ACL, LAC, or anti-β 2GPI, may lead to the development of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), which may occur alone (primary APS) or in the presence of an autoimmune disease (secondary APS). Although the genetic basis of APA and APS has been suggested [4, 5], the precise identity of the causative genes is largely unknown. Here we report the first GWAS focused on identifying the susceptibility loci/genes for the occurrence of three main APA, namely, ACL, LAC, and anti-β 2GPI.

Initially, we performed separate genome-wide analyses for the three APA because the antigen specificity of APA is highly heterogeneous and each APA may have different genetic determinants. This seems to be confirmed in our GWAS results where none of the top loci for the three APA overlapped (see Tables 24). However, a single-antibody analysis may include individuals who are positive for more than one antibody in the antibody-positive group or may include individuals in the antibody-negative group who are positive for another antibody, which might have an effect on the genetic association outcome. In order to address this potential problem, we performed an additional genome-wide analysis on individuals who were positive for two or more APA as they presumably would have a higher genetic load of APA susceptibility genes and compared them with those who were negative for all three APA tested. Noteworthy, seven of the top loci observed in the latter analysis overlapped with the top loci observed in the individual analyses of anti-β 2GPI and LAC (see Table 5). Although none of the observed top loci in any analysis met the strict criteria for genome-wide level of significance (P < 5E − 08), we have identified a number of suggestive genomic regions with P < E − 05 that are worthy of follow-up studies in independent samples. They include loci harboring DYNLRB2 (P = 1.44E − 06) and SESTD1 (P = 6.08E − 06) for individuals positive for at least two APA; PELO (P = 6.02E − 06), SGIP1 (P = 6.98E − 06), and LCA5 (P = 7.02E − 06) for ACL; MICAL3 (P = 2.21E − 06), FAM176A (P = 4.70E − 06), and DSTN (P = 6.54E − 06) for LAC; and MYO16 (P = 2.05E − 06), PDE1C (P = 2.88E − 06), TANK (P = 3.38E − 06), FLJ42392 (P = 6.68E − 06), and MACROD2 (P = 6.86E − 06) for anti-β 2GPI.

While many of these loci are of unknown function in antibody production, some of them harbor candidate genes known to be involved in immune response and thus may be relevant to the production of APA. For example, DYNLRB2 is involved in immune signaling and genetic variation in this gene is associated with tuberculosis susceptibility [7]. SESTD1 binds several phospholipid species [8] and may thus serve as an autoantigen for APA. TANK (TRAF family member-associated NFKB activator) is believed to be important in type 1 interferon production [9] and has been suggested to play a role in hepatitis B and C infections [10, 11]. The MYO16 (myosin XVI) locus has recently been implicated in diabetic nephropathy [1214]. Interestingly, the presence of APA or APS is a strong risk factor for nephropathy [1517] and one study has suggested that anti-β 2GPI may be protective against lupus nephritis and renal damage [18]. FAM176A (a.k.a TMEM166) has been implicated in autophagy and apoptosis [19], two mechanisms with suggested roles in autoimmunity [20, 21].

Before the GWAS era, the focus of genetic studies on APA was mainly on candidate genes, with a major emphasis on HLA genes located at the MHC locus and to some extent on APOH. Since none of our top hits included SNPs from either the HLA genes or APOH, we examined the extent of association signals in these genomic regions. Indeed, we found a number of promising significant SNPs near or in various HLA genes to be associated with ACL, LAC, and anti-β 2GPI (see Table 6). Our findings are consistent with previous reports that also found multiple associations of HLA genes with these autoantibodies [6]. Previous findings regarding the association of APOH coding SNPs with APA have been inconsistent because of the conflicting reports [6, 22]. In our sample, we found six APOH SNPs to be associated with anti-β 2GPI and the most significant SNP was rs1801690 (Trp316Ser) (see Table 7) that is located in the 5th domain of β 2GPI affecting the phospholipid-binding site [23]. Another coding SNP in APOH, rs3176975 (Val247Leu), that has been reported to be associated with APS [22], showed only a modest trend for association in our sample (odds ratio 1.21; P = 0.286). The replication of previously reported HLA and APOH findings with similar association signals serve as positive controls for our GWAS. On the other hand, it also indicates that HLA and APOH are not among the top loci for APA and thus our focus should be on the identification and characterization of other genes that are more relevant to the production of APA.

In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first GWAS that has attempted to delineate the genetic basis of three main APA, namely, ACL, LAC, and anti-β 2GPI. Although we did not identify loci meeting the conservative threshold of genome-wide significance, we have identified a number of suggestive novel loci for APA that will stimulate follow-up studies in independent and larger sample sets to replicate our findings. The main limitations of our study include relatively small sample size and lack of a replication sample; however, our top SNPs provide a select group of suggestive candidate loci/genes that can easily be tested for replication by other research groups, which would also enable a subsequent meta-analysis with increased power.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the US National Institutes of Health, Grants HL092397, HL088648, AR057028, AR046588, AR057338, HD066139, AR02318, AR30492, AR48098, AR30692, and RR025741, and by a Grant from the Lupus Foundation of America.

References

  • 1.Gharavi AE, Wilson WA, Wallace DJ. Antphospholipid antibodies. In: Hahn BH, editor. Dubois'Lupus Erythematosus. 5th. Baltimore, Md, USA: Williams & Wilkins; 1997. pp. 471–491. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Roubey RAS. Update on antiphospholipid antibodies. Current Opinion in Rheumatology. 2000;12(5):374–378. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200009000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pierangeli SS, De Groot PG, Dlott J, et al. “Criteria” aPL tests: report of a task force and preconference workshop at the 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies, Galveston, Texas, April 2010. Lupus. 2011;20(2):182–190. doi: 10.1177/0961203310395055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mackworth-Young C, Chan J, Harris N. High incidence of anticardiolipin antibodies in relatives of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Journal of Rheumatology. 1987;14(4):723–726. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Matthey F, Walshe K, Mackie IJ, Machin SJ. Familial occurrence of the antiphospholipid syndrome. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1989;42(5):495–497. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.5.495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Horita T, Merrill JT. Genetics of antiphospholipid syndrome. Current rheumatology reports. 2004;6(6):458–462. doi: 10.1007/s11926-004-0025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Png E, Alisjahbana B, Sahiratmadja E, et al. A genome wide association study of pulmonary tuberculosis susceptibility in Indonesians. BMC Medical Genetics. 2012;13:p. 5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-13-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Miehe S, Bieberstein A, Arnould I, Ihdene O, Rütten H, Strübing C. The phospholipid-binding protein SESTD1 is a novel regulator of the transient receptor potential channels TRPC4 and TRPC5. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010;285(16):12426–12434. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.068304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shitao L, Lingyan W, Michael B, et al. Mapping of dynamic innate immunity protein interaction network regulating type I interferon production. Immunity. 2011;35:426–440. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Song QL, He XX, Yang H, et al. Association of TANK gene polymorphism with outcomes of hepatitis B virus infection in a Chinese Han population. Viral Immunology. 2012;25:73–78. doi: 10.1089/vim.2011.0053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mosbruger TL, Duggal P, Goedert JJ, et al. Large-scale candidate gene analysis of spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2010;201(9):1371–1380. doi: 10.1086/651606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pezzolesi MG, Poznik GD, Mychaleckyj JC, et al. Variants in KCNQ1 are associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nature Genetics. 2008;40:1092–1097. doi: 10.1038/ng.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Maeda S, Araki SI, Babazono T, et al. Replication study for the association between four loci identified by a genome-wide association study on European American subjects with type 1 diabetes and susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2010;59(8):2075–2079. doi: 10.2337/db10-0067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pezzolesi MG, Poznik GD, Skupien J, et al. An intergenic region on chromosome 13q33.3 is associated with the susceptibility to kidney disease in type 1 and 2 diabetes. Kidney International. 2011;80(1):105–111. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gigante A, Gasperini ML, Cianci R, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies and renal involvement. American Journal of Nephrology. 2009;30(5):405–412. doi: 10.1159/000235941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tektonidou MG. Renal involvement in the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) - APS nephropathy. Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology. 2009;36(2-3):131–140. doi: 10.1007/s12016-008-8112-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Silvarino R, Sant F, Espinosa G, et al. Nephropathy associated with antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2011;20:721–729. doi: 10.1177/0961203310397410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mehrani T, Petri M. IgM anti-β 2 glycoprotein I is protective against lupus nephritis and renal damage in systemic lupus erythematosus. Journal of Rheumatology. 2011;38(3):450–453. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang L, Yu C, Lu Y, et al. TMEM166, a novel transmembrane protein, regulates cell autophagy and apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2007;12:1489–1502. doi: 10.1007/s10495-007-0073-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pierdominici M, Vomero M, Barbati C, et al. Role of autophagy in immunity and autoimmunity, with a special focus on systemic lupus erythematosus. FASEB Journal. 2012;26:1400–1412. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-194175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mũoz LE, Lauber K, Schiller M, Manfredi AA, Herrmann M. The role of defective clearance of apoptotic cells in systemic autoimmunity. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2010;6(5):280–289. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chamorro A-J, Marcos M, Miron-Canelo J-A, et al. Val247Leu beta2-glycoprotein-I allelic variant is associated with antiphospholipid syndrome: systemic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2012;11:705–712. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sanghera DK, Wagenknecht DR, McIntyre JA, Kamboh MI. Identification of structural mutations in the fifth domain of apolipoprotein H (β 2-glycoprotein I) which affect phospholipid binding. Human Molecular Genetics. 1997;6(2):311–316. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.2.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Autoimmune Diseases are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES