Skip to main content
Journal of Biomedical Research logoLink to Journal of Biomedical Research
. 2012 Apr 24;26(4):274–277. doi: 10.7555/JBR.26.20110103

Immunoexpression and prognostic role of p53 in different subtypes of epithelial ovarian carcinoma

Lihong Chen a,b, Lianxiang Li b, Feng Chen c, Dalin He a,*
PMCID: PMC3596744  PMID: 23554760

Abstract

We sought to investigate the significance of p53 expression for epithelial ovarian carcinoma. In this study, we used immunohistochemical method to investigate the expression patterns of p53 in different subtypes of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. We found that the expressions of p53 protein in epithelial ovarian cancer (pituita, serosity and intima) were 88.9%, 75% and 100%, respectively, while the recurrence rates among three cancer subtypes were significantly different (33.3%, 12.5% and 0%, respectively; P < 0.05). Compared with patients without lymph node metastasis, the expression of p53 in patients with lymph node metastasis was significantly strong (68.75% and 100%, respectively; P < 0.05). However, the recurrence rate in the patients with lymph node metastasis (40%) was higher than that without lymph node metastasis (6.25%, P < 0.05). The expressions of p53 protein in ovarian cancer between I-II (25%) stage and II-IV stage (100%) were significantly different (P < 0.05), and the recurrence rates between the two groups were significantly different (0% and 31.25%, respectively, P < 0.05). Therefore, p53 protein has an intimate relationship with the malignant degree and the prognosis of ovarian cancer.

Keywords: ovarian cancer, p53, prognosis

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of ovarian cancer ranks third among all gynecologic cancers, behind cervical and endometrial cancer, but it ranks first in mortality[1]. In the United States, ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cancer among women, with approximately 16,090 deaths and 4,000 new cases per year. The 5-year survival rate for ovarian cancer is only 20%-30% with a long-term chemotherapy after surgery[2]. However, the molecular mechanisms that lead to the development of ovarian cancer are unknown. The activations of many oncogenes have been implicated in the onset of ovarian cancer. P53 is a tumor suppressor protein which regulates the expression of various genes involved in apoptosis, growth arrest, inhibition of cell cycle progression, cell differentiation and DNA repair or senescence in response to genotoxic or cellular stress[3]. Recently, many studies have suggested that in the progression of ovarian cancer, the alteration of genes on chromosome 17 may frequently be of significance[3]-[6]. Since p53 is located on chromosome 17p13.1, we aimed to determine the expressions of p53 in epithelial ovarian cancer.

In the present study, we used immunohistochemical technique to investigate the expression pattern of p53 in epithelial ovarian carcinoma, and, furthermore, we explored the relationship between prognostic factor and clinicopathological features of p53 in different types of epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Clinical samples

Between January 2005 and April 2006, 26 consecutive epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients without any previous treatments were selected in this study. Each patient underwent surgery as part of treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer at the Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital. All of the patients received chemotherapy following primary surgical exploration. All patients were followed up. The definition of recurrent ovarian cancer is that after satisfactory cytoreductive surgery, regular and adequate chemotherapy, ovarian cancer has returned less than 6 months after stopping chemotherapy. Evidence and signs of recurrent ovarian cancer include increased levels of CA125, physical examination revealed tumor, and imaging study revealed tumor, pleural effusion and unexplained intestinal obstruction. Once two of the criteria mentioned above have been satisfied, ovarian cancer recurrence should be considered. This study was approved by related institutional review boards of the Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, and all of the participants signed the informed consent.

Antibodies and reagents

Mouse anti-human p53 monoclonal antibody was purchased from B&D Biosciences Pharmingen (San Diego, CA, USA). SP kit was purchased from Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).

Immunohistochemical analysis

Specimens were fixed in paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, cut at 5 µm, and then respectively detected with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical staining. Samples were deparaffinized in xylene at room temperature for 30 min, rehydrated in graded ethanol and washed in phosphate buffer saline (PBS). The samples were then placed in 10 mol/L citrate buffer (pH 6.0) and boiled in a microwave for epitope retrieval for 10 min. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by incubating tissue sections in 3% H2O2 for 10 min. Sections were incubated with mouse anti-human p53 monoclonal antibody that was at 1:25 dilution in a humidity chamber at 37°C for 30 min. They were washed in PBS for 5 min at room temperature. Sections were subsequently stained according to the labeled streptavidin peroxidase method using a commercial SP kit and were visualized using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Sections were then followed by counterstaining the sections with hematoxylin. Sections from epithelial ovarian carcinoma tissue with known p53 expression were used as positive control. Sections incubated without the primary antibody were used as negative control. For the assessment of staining, examination fields were randomly selected. The cells at each intensity of staining were recorded on a scale of negative (no staining cell), positive (staining cells of <50%, or weak staining), and strong positive (staining cells of >or =50%, or strong staining).

Statistical analysis

All the data were analyzed using the SPSS software 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). The χ2-test was used to evaluate the expression of p53 protein in ovarian cancer. P < 0.05 was regarded as the threshold value for statistical significance.

RESULTS

The expressions of p53 protein in different pathological epithelial ovarian cancer subtypes (pituita, serosity and intima) were 88.9%, 75% and 100%, respectively, However, the recurrence rates among the three subtypes were obviously significant (33.3%, 12.5% and 0%, respectively; P < 0.05). In patients with lymph node metastases, the expression of p53 was high (100%), while it was low in patients without lymph node metastasis (68.75%). In addition, the recurrence rate of ovarian cancer patients (40%) with lymph node metastasis was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than patients without lymph node metastasis (6.25%) (Table 1 and Fig. 1).

Table 1. The expression pattern of P53 protein in different subtypes of ovarian caner.

Group n - + ++ Positive rate
Recurrence [n(%)]
(+) (++)
Mucinous tumor 9 0 1 8 100% 88.90% 3(33.30%)
Serous tumor 16 0 4 12 100% 75% 2(12.50%)
Endometrioid tumor 1 0 0 1 100% 100% 0(0%)
Lymph node metastases 10 0 0 10 100% 100% 4(40%)
No lymph node metastases 16 0 5 11 100% 68.75% 1(6.25%)

Fig. 1. The expressions of p53 in the three subtypes of ovarian cancer.

Fig. 1

Tissue samples were stained by immunohistochemistry. A: negative control of p53. B: positive expression of p53 (+). C: strong positive expression of p53 (++).

Positive staining of p53 was seen in 8 (53%) of 15 early stage cancers (stage I/II, and in 11 (100%) of 11 advanced stage cancers (stage III/IV). Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the recurrence rates in epithelial ovarian cancer patients between early stages and late stages (I/II vs III/IV) were significantly different (0% and 31.25%, respectively; P < 0.01) (Table 2).

Table 2. The expression patterns of p53 protein in different stages of ovarian caner.

Group n - + ++ Positive rate
Recurrence [n(%)]
(+) (++)
Stage I∼II 10 0 8 2 100% 25% 0(0%)
Stage II∼IV 16 0 0 16 100% 100% 5(31.25%)

DISCUSSION

Despite significant advances in chemotherapy, the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer remains poor. Apart from clinicopathological parameters associated with prognosis, p53 is one of the well-known molecular markers[4][6]. P53 has been described as “the guardian of the genome”, referring to its role in conserving stability by preventing genome mutation. P53 is a critical tumor suppressor that maintains genetic stability in mammals by playing multiple roles in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, senescence and differentiation[10]. Therefore, p53 could prevent the passage of DNA damage to daughter cells. More and more evidence indicates that the critical tumor suppressor p53 is mutated in over half of all human cancers, including ovarian cancer. Accumulating evidence has indicated that p53 mutation, including the hotspot mutations (R175H, R248W and R273H)[11],[12], not only lose the tumor suppression activity of widetype p53, but also gain novel oncogenic activities to promote tumorigenesis and drug resistance[13],[14]. The expressions of p53 mutants are more stable and correlated with poor prognosis of cancer patients[15][17].

Even though many investigators have demonstrated that p53 mutations are associated with advanced disease and poor prognosis in ovarian cancer, the prognostic significance of p53 mutation remains a controversial issue[18]. In ovarian cancer, some studies have shown the prognostic effectiveness of p53 mutants, while other studies did not show that[19][23]. However, in our study we found that mutation of p53 correlated with some clinicopathological parameters including advanced stage and lymphatic metastasis.

There are some limitations to our study. For example, we did not investigate gene mutation of p53 and immunohistochemistry, which may have led to false-negative or false-positive findings. Some investigators have reported that null mutations or homozygous gene deletion of p53 showed negative immunostaining. In addition, it has been reported that highly positive p53 staining and totally negative p53 staining predicted poor survival for ovarian cancer. Despite these limitations, immunohistochemistry has shown some advantages of being an easy procedure, highly cost effective and a stable status of samples in a clinical setting. The present study evaluated the expression of p53 mutants in ovarian cancer patients treated with surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. In conclusion, expression of p53 mutants is closely correlated with malignancy and prognosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma, so it could be considered as a prognostic indicator.

References

  • 1.McGuire V, Jesser CA, Whittemore AS. Survival among US women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;84:399–403. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zagouri F, Dimopoulos MA, Bournakis E, Papadimitriou CA. Molecular markers in epithelial ovarian cancer: their role in prognosis and therapy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2010;31:268–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jelovac D, Armstrong DK. Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:183–203. doi: 10.3322/caac.20113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wojnarowicz PM, Breznan A, Arcand SL, Filali-Mouhim A, Provencher DM, Mes-Masson AM, et al. Construction of a chromosome 17 transcriptome in serous ovarian cancer identifies differentially expressed genes. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18:963–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01134.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Manderson EN, Presneau N, Provencher D, Mes-Masson AM, Tonin PN. Comparative analysis of loss of heterozygosity of specific chromosome 3, 13, 17, and X loci and TP53 mutations in human epithelial ovarian cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2002;34:78–90. doi: 10.1002/mc.10051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wojnarowicz PM, Provencher DM, Mes-Masson AM, Tonin PN. Chromosome 17q25 genes, RHBDF2 and CYGB, in ovarian cancer. Int J Oncol. 2012;40:1865–80. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shalin SC, Sakharpe A, Lyle S, Lev D, Calonje E, Lazar AJ. p53 Staining Correlates With Tumor Type and Location in Sebaceous Neoplasms. Am J Dermatopathol. 2012;34:129–38. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0b013e3181ed39f9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gryko M, Pryczynicz A, Guzińska-Ustymowicz K, Kamocki Z, Zaręba K, Kemona A, et al. Immunohistochemical assessment of apoptosis-associated proteins: p53, Bcl-xL, Bax and Bak in gastric cancer cells in correlation with clinical and pathomorphological factors. Adv Med Sci. 2012;57:1–7. doi: 10.2478/v10039-012-0012-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wilsker D, Chung JH, Bunz F. Chk1 suppresses bypass of mitosis and tetraploidization in p53-deficient cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:1–9. doi: 10.4161/cc.19944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Muller PAJ, Vousden KH, Norman JC. p53 and its mutants in tumor cell migration and invasion. J Cell Biol. 2011;192:209–18. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201009059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kogan-Sakin I, Tabach Y, Buganim Y, Molchadsky A, Solomon H, Madar S, et al. Mutant p53R175H upregulates Twist1 expression and promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in immortalized prostate cells. Cell Death Differ. 2010;18:271–81. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Morton JP, Timpson P, Karim SA, Ridgway RA, Athineos D, Doyle B, et al. Mutant p53 drives metastasis and overcomes growth arrest/senescence in pancreatic cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:246–51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908428107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Das P, Vaiphei K, Jain D, Wig JD. p53 and mdm2 expression in colorectal carcinoma: a correlative analysis with clinical staging and histological parameters. Int J Surg Pathol. 2007;15:335–45. doi: 10.1177/1066896907304988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brosh R, Rotter V. When mutants gain new powers: news from the mutant p53 field. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:701–13. doi: 10.1038/nrc2693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hollstein M, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, Harris CC. p53 mutations in human cancers. Science. 1991;253:49–53. doi: 10.1126/science.1905840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Seemann S, Maurici D, Olivier M, Fromentel CC, Hainaut P. The tumor suppressor gene TP53: implications for cancer management and therapy. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2004;41:551–83. doi: 10.1080/10408360490504952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Swisher SG, Roth JA. Clinical update of Ad-p53 gene therapy for lung cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2002;11:521–35. doi: 10.1016/s1055-3207(02)00028-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hofstetter G, Berger A, Schuster E, Wolf A, Hager G, Vergote I, et al. Δ133p53 is an independent prognostic marker in p53 mutant advanced serous ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;105:1593–9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Flesken-Nikitin A, Choi KC, Eng JP, Shmidt EN, Nikitin AY. Induction of carcinogenesis by concurrent inactivation of p53 and Rb1 in the mouse ovarian surface epithelium. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3459–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jonkers J, Meuwissen R, van der Gulden H, Peterse H, van der Valk M, Berns A. Synergistic tumor suppressor activity of BRCA2 and p53 in a conditional mouse model for breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2001;29:418–25. doi: 10.1038/ng747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hibbs K, Skubitz KM, Pambuccian SE, Casey RC, Burleson KM, Oegema TR, et al. Differential gene expression in ovarian carcinoma: identification of potential biomarkers. Am J Pathol. 2004;165:397–414. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63306-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li CM, Guo M, Borczuk A, Powell CA, Wei M, Thaker HM, et al. Gene expression in Wilms, tumor mimics the earliest committed stage in the metanephric mesenchymal-epithelial transition. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:2181–90. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61166-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Plisiecka-Hałasa J, Karpińska G, Szymańska T, Ziółkowska I, Madry R, Timorek A, et al. P21WAF1, P27KIP1, TP53 and C-MYC analysis in 204 ovarian carcinomas treated with platinum-based regimens. Ann Oncol. 2003;14:1078–85. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Biomedical Research are provided here courtesy of Nanjing Medical University Press

RESOURCES