Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2013 Feb 11;135(7):2470–2473. doi: 10.1021/ja3125405

Late-Stage Deoxyfluorination of Alcohols with PhenoFluor

Filippo Sladojevich 1, Sophie I Arlow 1, Pingping Tang 1, Tobias Ritter 1,*
PMCID: PMC3596866  NIHMSID: NIHMS445086  PMID: 23397884

Abstract

An operationally simple protocol for the selective deoxyfluorination of structurally complex alcohols is presented. Several fluorinated derivatives of natural products and pharmaceuticals have been prepared to showcase the potential of the method for late-stage diversification and its functional group compatibility. A series of simple guidelines for predicting selectivity in substrates with multiple alcohols is given.


The selective modification of natural products and drug-like molecules can rapidly generate new pharmaceutical candidates with potentially improved pharmacological profiles.1 Late-stage fluorination2 is particularly promising in this regard because incorporation of fluorine into molecules can increase their metabolic stability, bioavailability, and blood brain barrier penetration.3 But late-stage fluorination is challenging and, to the best of our knowledge, no general late-stage aliphatic fluorination method is currently available. Here we report the first functional group tolerant aliphatic deoxyfluorination reaction of complex primary, secondary, and tertiary alcohols. Deoxyfluorination of structurally simple alcohols is known, and several reagents for deoxyfluorination have been described.4,5 However, current deoxyfluorination methods are commonly characterized by limited functional group tolerance, side reactions such as elimination, and instability or explosion of the reagents upon heating.4c,5a,6 The method presented herein employs commercially available PhenoFluor (1), a crystalline, non-explosive solid that does not suffer from competing side reactions to the extent that other deoxyfluorination reagents do. The conceptual advantage of PhenoFluor, beyond its better safety profile, is manifested in its chemoselectivity which results in the ability to selectively and predictably introduce fluorine also into complex small molecules with several hydroxyl groups, which has not been shown with other reagents.

graphic file with name nihms445086e1.jpg (1)

PhenoFluor (1) was originally developed for deoxyfluorination of phenols,7 and we found that appropriate modification of the reaction conditions allows deoxyfluorination of aliphatic alcohols. Deoxyfluorination of alcohols can be accomplished with several commercially available reagents, such as DAST5a and Deoxo-fluor,5b but is normally not compatible with a variety of functional groups, and is often plagued by elimination or other side reactions.5a,6 Table 1 shows the utility of PhenoFluor compared to other commercially available deoxyfluorination reagents, and illustrates that PhenoFluor gives access to fluorinated molecules that are practically inaccessible by deoxyfluorination with other reagents. Fmoc-serine methyl ester was selected as a simple but challenging test substrate for evaluation. The β-hydroxy ester moiety of Fmoc-serine methyl ester is prone to formal elimination of water when the hydroxyl group is converted into a leaving group, and the carbamate group can form the corresponding aziridine by intramolecular cyclization subsequent to alcohol activation, both of which were observed with the conventional reagents shown in Table 1. Evaluation of each reagent was performed in toluene, dioxane, and under optimized conditions previously reported for each reagent.5a–e Fluoroserine 2 was obtained at best in 11% yield with conventional deoxyfluorination reagents, but could be obtained in up to 80% yield with PhenoFluor.

Table 1.

Comparison of PhenoFluor with other commercially available deoxyfluorinating reagents.a

graphic file with name nihms445086f2.jpg
a

Yields were determined by 19F-NMR using 1-fluoro-3-nitrobenzene as internal standard.

b

Best yield obtained from reactions run in toluene, dioxane and under optimized reaction conditions previously reported for each reagent (see SI for details).

Deoxyfluorination of aliphatic alcohols with PhenoFluor can be carried out at room temperature, enabling fluorination of temperature-sensitive substrates. For example, for everolimus8 (see 15) or oligomycin A (see 17), fluorination was performed at room temperature to avoid decomposition (Table 2). The addition of Hünig’s base is beneficial to shorten the reaction time, and KF was found to reduce side products resulting from elimination, but is not generally required for the reaction to proceed. The formation of reaction products resulting from elimination could also be reduced by increasing the reaction temperature from 23 °C to 80 °C when toluene is used as solvent. For example, while deoxyfluorination proceeds at 23 °C, deoxyfluorination of testosterone (see 3) and epi-androsterone (see 13) was performed at 80 °C because elimination was found to be the main side reaction for epi-androsterone and testosterone at 23 °C. Appropriate reaction solvents in addition to toluene are dioxane and CH2Cl2, depending on the solubility of the alcohol substrate. Chiral secondary alcohols can typically be deoxyfluorinated with inversion without observed epimerization or elimination. In addition, secondary allylic alcohols afforded allylic fluorides consistent with an SN2 mechanism, and only small amounts, if any, of allylic fluorides consistent with an SN2′ mechanism. Ketones and especially aldehydes are challenging substrates for deoxyfluorination reactions because they are often converted to the corresponding gem-difluorides,4a yet, PhenoFluor can tolerate carbonyl functional groups (see e.g. 3, 6, 13).

Table 2.

Late-Stage Deoxyfluorination of Alcohols with PhenoFluor.

graphic file with name nihms445086f3.jpg
a

Parent compound refers to the name of the natural product/pharmaceutical used as starting material or to the name of the natural product/pharmaceutical from which the starting material is derived.

b

Isolated yields of single compound.

c

No KF was used.

d

16% of the corresponding primary allylic fluoride was isolated.

e

Deoxyfluorination with retention was observed.

Complex molecules, such as several of those depicted in Table 2, frequently contain more than one carbinol. Typically, PhenoFluor can discriminate between different carbinols and afford a single fluorinated analog in synthetically useful selectivity; for example, 71% of the fluorinated oligomycin A analog 16 was isolated, despite the presence of five hydroxyl groups in oligomycin A (18, Figure 1). We have observed several trends that enable prediction of the fluorination site in the presence of several hydroxyl groups: 1) Primary alcohols are selectively deoxyfluorinated in the presence of secondary and tertiary alcohols. 2) Secondary alcohols react significantly slower or not at all when they are β, β′ -dibranched, unless the secondary alcohol is allylic. 3) Tertiary alcohols do not react, unless they are allylic. 4) Based on previous observations,7 hydroxyl groups engaged in hydrogen bonding are not reactive. For the substrates evaluated, these four guidelines were suitable to correctly predict reactivity and selectivity for deoxyfluorination.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Rationale for the site-selective deoxyfluorination of oligomycin A (18).

PhenoFluor distinguishes itself from other deoxyfluorination reagents such as DAST primarily through its better safety profile and higher chemoselectivity. The chemoselectivity of PhenoFluor enables access to complex fluorinated molecules; other de-oxofluorination reagents do not discriminate well between reactive functional groups. For example, DAST affords several (at least five) more fluorinated analogs upon reaction with 18, which results from indiscriminate reaction of DAST with secondary alcohols, including β, β′-substituted carbinols. The source of the differentiated chemoselectivity of PhenoFluor is not yet understood, but likely is more complex than could be rationalized simply based on its larger size compared to the other deoxyfluorination reagents. We have observed that unanticipated hydrogen bonding between the hydrogen atoms of the imidazoline ring of PhenoFluor with bifluoride is important for reactivity.7 The better safety profile is another benefit of PhenoFluor. Several conventional reagents are unstable toward heat or even explosive. An exotherm of only 0.15 kcal·g−1 at 213 °C was observed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) when PhenoFluor was heated until its decomposition temperature of 213 °C.

In conclusion, we have developed a general method for the selective, predictable, direct deoxyfluorination of complex alcohols. The substrate scope and functional group tolerance surpasses those of any aliphatic fluorination reaction reported to date. One drawback of PhenoFluor is its molecular mass of 427 g·M−1, which makes it a convenient reagent for sub-gram and gram scale, but a wasteful reagent for larger scale reactions. We are currently investigating the potential of extending the reported method to late-stage 18F-radiolabeling9 for positron emission tomography (PET) applications.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Huang (Harvard) for help with NMR data collection and structure elucidation, E. Lee (Harvard) for X-ray data collection and analysis, and the NIH (GM088237) and European Community (Marie Curie IOF fellowship to FS) for financial support.

Footnotes

Notes

PhenoFluor is currently sold by Sigma Aldrich and Strem and licensed by SciFluor Life Sciences. PT and TR have financial interest in PhenoFluor sales.

Supporting Information

Detailed experimental procedures, spectroscopic characterization for all new compounds and details for the comparison of PhenoFluor with other commercially available reagents. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.(a) Long AAW, Nayler JHC, Smith H, Taylor T, Ward N. J Chem Soc (C) 1971:1920–1922. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lewis CA, Miller SJ. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2006;45:5616–5619. doi: 10.1002/anie.200601490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Newman DJ, Cragg GM. J Nat Prod. 2007;70:461–477. doi: 10.1021/np068054v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Butler MS. Nat Prod Rep. 2008;25:475–516. doi: 10.1039/b514294f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Reed SA, Mazzotti AR, White MC. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:11701–11706. doi: 10.1021/ja903939k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Balthaser BR, Maloney MC, Beeler AB, Porco JA, Jr, Snyder JK. Nat Chem. 2011;3:969–973. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Jordan PA, Miller SJ. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:2907–2911. doi: 10.1002/anie.201109033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Pathak TP, Miller SJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:6120–6123. doi: 10.1021/ja301566t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Fowler BS, Laemmerhold KM, Miller SJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:9755–9761. doi: 10.1021/ja302692j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (k) Voica AF, Mendoza A, Gutekunst WR, Fraga JO, Baran PS. Nat Chem. 2012;4:629–635. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.For examples of late-stage fluorination, see: Watson DA, Su M, Teverovskiy G, Zhang Y, Garcia-Fortanet J, Kinzel T, Buchwald SL. Science. 2009;325:1661–1664. doi: 10.1126/science.1178239.Tang P, Furuya T, Ritter T. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:12150–12154. doi: 10.1021/ja105834t.For selected examples of di-and trifluoromethylation, see: Ji Y, Brueckl T, Baxter RD, Fujiwara Y, Seiple IB, Su S, Blackmond DG, Baran PS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:14411–14415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109059108.Nagib DA, Mac-Millan DWC. Nature. 2011;480:224–228. doi: 10.1038/nature10647.Fujiwara Y, Dixon JA, Rodriguez RA, Baxter RD, Dixon DD, Collins MR, Blackmond DG, Baran PS. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:1494–1497. doi: 10.1021/ja211422g.Fujiwara Y, Dixon JA, O’Hara F, Funder ED, Dixon DD, Rodriguez RA, Baxter RD, Herle B, Sach N, Collins MR, Ishihara Y, Baran PS. Nature. 2012;492:95–99. doi: 10.1038/nature11680.
  • 3.(a) Furuya T, Kuttruff CA, Ritter T. Curr Opin Drug Discovery Dev. 2008;11:803–819. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Böhm HJ, Banner D, Bendels S, Kansy M, Kuhn B, Müller K, Obst-Sander U, Stahl M. ChemBioChem. 2004;5:637–643. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200301023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Muller K, Faeh C, Diederich F. Science. 2007;317:1881–1886. doi: 10.1126/science.1131943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Purser S, Moore PR, Swallow S, Gouverneur V. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:320–330. doi: 10.1039/b610213c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Furuya T, Kamlet AS, Ritter T. Nature. 2011;473:470–477. doi: 10.1038/nature10108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.For reviews about deoxyfluorination, see: Singh RP, Shreeve JnM. Synthesis. 2002:2561–2578.Singh RP, Meshri DT, Shreeve JnM. Adv Org Synth. 2006;2:291–326.Kirk KL. Org Process Res Dev. 2008;12:305–321.Al-Maharik N, O’Hagan D. Aldrichimica Acta. 2011;44:65–75.
  • 5.For DAST, see: Middleton WJ. J Org Chem. 1975;40:574–578.For Deoxo-fluor, see: Lal GS, Pez GP, Pesaresi RJ, Prozonic FM, Cheng H. J Org Chem. 1999;64:7048–7054.For DFI, see: Hayashi H, Sonoda H, Fukumura K, Nagata T. Chem Commun. 2002:1618–1619. doi: 10.1039/b204471d.For Xtal-fluor, see: Beaulieu F, Beauregard LP, Courchesne G, Couturier M, LaFlamme F, L’Heureux A. Org Lett. 2009;11:5050–5053. doi: 10.1021/ol902039q.For Fluolead, see: Umemoto T, Singh RP, Xu Y, Saito N. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:18199–18205. doi: 10.1021/ja106343h.For others deoxyfluorinating reagents, see: Yarovenko NN, Raksha MA, Shemanina VN, Vasil’eva AS. Zh Obshch Khim. 1957;27:2246–2250.Takaoka A, Iwakiri H, Ishikawa N. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1979;52:3377–3380.Munyemana Fo, Frisque-Hesbain A-M, Devos A, Ghosez Lo. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989;30:3077–3080.
  • 6.Kirsch P, editor. Modern Fluoroorganic Chemistry. Wiley-VCH; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tang P, Wang W, Ritter T. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:11482–11484. doi: 10.1021/ja2048072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.For example, storage recommendations for everolimus are a temperature of −20 °C, exclusion of light and the presence of BHT as stabilizer.[European Medicines Agency, Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use, London, 29 May 2009 Doc. Ref.: EMEA/533232/2009]. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/; downloaded 12/22/2012.
  • 9.(a) Lee E, Kamlet AS, Powers DC, Neumann CN, Boursalian GB, Furuya T, Choi DC, Hooker JM, Ritter T. Science. 2011;334:639–642. doi: 10.1126/science.1212625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lee E, Hooker JM, Ritter T. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:17456–17458. doi: 10.1021/ja3084797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES