Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Rheumatol. 2012 Jun 1;39(7):1392–1398. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111196

Seasonal Variation in the Activity of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

ALÍ DUARTE-GARCÍA 1, HONG FANG 1, CHI HUNG TO 1, LAURENCE S MAGDER 1, MICHELLE PETRI 1
PMCID: PMC3597113  NIHMSID: NIHMS450963  PMID: 22660806

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether there is any seasonal variation in the activity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) overall and by individual organs.

Methods

The study group comprised 2102 patients with SLE who were followed in a prospective longitudinal cohort study. In this cohort, 92.3% of the patients were women. The mean ± SD age of the patients was 47.9 ± 13.9 years, 56.3% were white, 37.1% were African American, and 3.1% were Asian. Global disease activity was recorded by the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment – Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) and the physician's global assessment. Activity of each organ was also recorded using SLEDAI terms and a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 to 3).

Results

There was significant seasonal variation in photosensitive rash (p < 0.0001), which was more frequent in the spring and summer months (p < 0.0001). There was significantly more arthritis activity in spring and summer, as measured by both SELENA-SLEDAI (p = 0.0057) and the joint VAS (p = 0.0047). A decrease in renal activity was found in the summer months compared to the rest of the year (p = 0.0397). Serositis recorded by VAS had higher activity from August to October (p = 0.0392). Anti-dsDNA levels were significantly higher during October and November (p < 0.0001). There was significant seasonal variation in antiphospholipid antibody levels (p < 0.0001) and lupus anticoagulant (p = 0.0003). We found a significant variation in activity through the year in global disease activity as measured by SELENA-SLEDAI (p = 0.048).

Conclusion

In the Hopkins Lupus Cohort, skin and joint activity is increased during the spring and summer, but other organs have different patterns. These seasonal variations likely reflect environmental factors that influence disease activity, including ultraviolet light and infections.

Keywords: SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS, DISEASE ACTIVITY, SEASONAL VARIATION


There is evidence that several rheumatic diseases have seasonal variation. A seasonal pattern has been reported regarding the onset of weakness in inflammatory myopathy1. Acute gout attacks are more common in the spring2,3, and the onset of rheumatoid arthritis4 and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's)5 is more common in the winter.

Previous studies of a seasonal influence on SLE activity have yielded conflicting results, some suggesting that there was only an increased incidence of photosensitive rashes in the summer months6,7, whereas others found more joint pain in the winter and spring8,9. In addition, a study of renal biopsies10 found that the prevalence of class V lupus nephritis was significantly higher in winter and spring. Steup-Beekman, et al11 did not observe a seasonal variation in flares or first occurrence of neuropsychiatric SLE. In a study of seasonal variation in the titers of antiphospholipid antibodies, there was no variation among patients who had strokes, but there was seasonal variability in the apparently normal population12. Previous studies in SLE have had a small sample size or were retrospective. Our hypothesis, based on a preliminary study done in Hong Kong by To, et al, was that there would be seasonal variation in organ systems other than cutaneous lupus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included all patients with SLE who were members of the Hopkins Lupus Cohort from 1986 through 2010. The Hopkins Lupus Cohort was approved by the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board. All patients gave written informed consent. Patient inclusion in the prospective longitudinal cohort was based on the clinical diagnosis of SLE by 1 author (MP). Ninety-eight percent of the patients fulfilled at least 4 of the 1982 American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of SLE13,14. Basic demographic characteristics, presenting and cumulative clinical manifestations, and immunologic markers were recorded since cohort entry. The patients were seen quarterly or more frequently if medically indicated. At each patient visit, a complete history, examination, and routine laboratory testing were performed in a systematic and prospective fashion by protocol. The Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA) revision of the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)15 and the physician's global assessment (PGA) on a 0–3 visual analog scale (VAS)16 were calculated at each visit by 1 investigator (MP). The VAS, which comprise the Lupus Activity Index, have been validated17. Activity of each organ system was also recorded on a 0 to 3 VAS. Data were taken at each visit for anti-dsDNA, immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG, IgA anti-cardiolipin, lupus anticoagulant (LAC) tested by dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT), and complement levels. Viral and bacterial infections were registered at each visit. Results were plotted against the month during which they were reported.

Mean levels of disease activity scores for each organ system were calculated by month. General estimating equations (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) were used to calculate p values accounting for the repeated observations from the same patients. For each organ system, we first calculated a “global” p value to assess the degree of evidence against the null hypothesis that the mean activity level is the same in all months. If there was strong evidence against the global null hypothesis (i.e., p < 0.01), we calculated post hoc p values to assess hypotheses about specific months or seasons. Linear regression models with interactions were used to assess whether the changes in seasonal variation varied by ethnicity or calendar year.

RESULTS

Included in our study were 2102 patients with SLE, of whom 1940 (92.3%) were women. The mean ± SD age was 47.9 ± 13.9 years. The mean number of cohort visits per patient was 22. A total of 1183 (56.3%) were white, 780 (37.1%) were African American, and 65 (3.1%) were Asian (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of patients in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort (n = 2102). Data are n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

Characteristics Total Cohort, n = 2102 White, n = 1183 African American, n = 780 Other Ethnicities, n = 139
Age at SLE onset, yrs, mean (SD) 29.4 (12.7) 29.6 (13.3) 29.6 (11.8) 26.4 (11.8)
Age at SLE diagnosis, yrs, mean (SD) 32.6 (12.9) 33.7 (13.4) 31.7 (12.0) 28.7 (12.4)
Age at last assessment, yrs, mean (SD) 42.9 (13.5) 43.7 (13.7) 42.8 (13.2) 36.9 (12.2)
Disease duration from SLE diagnosis to last visit, yrs, mean (SD) 10.8 (8.2) 10.5 (7.9) 11.5 (8.9) 8.9 (6.2)
Sex
    Women 1940 (92.3) 1082 (91.5) 727 (93.2) 131 (94.2)
    Men 162 (7.7) 101 (8.5) 53 (6.8) 8 (5.8)
Ethnicity
    White 1183 (56.3)
    African American 780 (37.1)
    Other 139 (6.6)
Photosensitivity 1129 (53.9) 740 (62.9) 323 (41.5) 66 (47.5)
Arthritis 1540 (73.8) 840 (71.6) 605 (78.1) 95 (68.8)
Neurologic 78 (3.8) 35 (3.0) 40 (5.2) 3 (2.2)
Serositis 1034 (49.2) 548 (46.4) 422 (54.1) 64 (46.0)
Renal 879 (42.1) 370 (31.5) 434 (56.0) 75 (54.0)
Anti-dsDNA 1322 (63.1) 702 (59.6) 517 (66.3) 103 (74.6)
Low complement 1298 (57.5) 680 (57.5) 501 (64.3) 117 (84.2)
Anticardiolipin antibodies 966 (47.6) 551 (48.3) 351 (46.8) 64 (46.4)
Lupus anticoagulant 537 (26.5) 326 (28.5) 177 (23.6) 34 (25.2)
Raynaud's phenomenon 1094 (52.2) 654 (55.5) 377 (48.4) 63 (45.7)

Photosensitive rash

Photosensitive rash was identified by both the SELENA-SLEDAI and the rash VAS. There was strong evidence of seasonal variation (global p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0015 for the SLEDAI and VAS results, respectively; Figures 1A, 1B). There were significantly higher scores from April to September compared to the rest of the year (p < 0.0001). The results of the subanalysis by ethnicity showed seasonal variation of lupus rash by the VAS in whites (p < 0.0001), but not in African Americans (p = 0.1356). Similarly, the photosensitive rash by SELENA-SLEDAI showed significant seasonal variation for whites (p < 0.0001), but was not significant in African Americans (p = 0.1148).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Lupus activity within various organ systems. A. Photosensitive rash identified by SELENA-SLEDAI. B. Photosensitive rash measured by visual analog scale (VAS). C. Arthritis identified by SELENA-SLEDAI. D. Arthritis measured by VAS. Values in the Y axis refer to the means of all observations at that month. Error bars represent mean ± 1 standard error.

Musculoskeletal activity

Arthritis was identified by both the SELENA-SLEDAI (≥ 2 joints with pain and signs of inflammation) and the joint VAS (which identified both arthralgias and arthritis). We observed significant seasonal variation through SELENA-SLEDAI (global p = 0.0057) and the VAS (global p = 0.0047; Figures 1C and 1D). There was significantly more arthritis activity in May through October, measured by both SELENA-SLEDAI (p = 0.0002) and the joint VAS (p = 0.0002; Figures 1C and 1D).

Central nervous system (CNS) activity

CNS activity was measured by both SELENA-SLEDAI and the neurologic VAS. Significant seasonal differences in CNS activity were not found (global p = 0.0638 for the SLEDAI and p = 0.2118 for VAS results). However, the highest amount of CNS activity shown by the SELENA-SLEDAI (Figure 2A) was in August, September, October, and November, compared to the rest of the year. CNS activity revealed by the neurologic VAS was higher in August, October, and November (Figure 2B). The CNS activity pattern on the neurologic VAS appeared to be bimodal.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Lupus activity within various organ systems. A. Central nervous system (CNS) activity shown by SELENA-SLEDAI. B. CNS activity by visual analog scale (VAS). C. Serositis measured by SELENA-SLEDAI. D. Serositis shown by VAS. Values in the Y axis refer to the means of all observations at that month. Error bars represent mean ± 1 standard error.

Serositis

Serositis was identified by combining the SELENA-SLEDAI terms of pericarditis and pleurisy and by the serositis VAS. We found some evidence of seasonal variation in serositis activity, measured by SELENA-SLEDAI (global p = 0.0545) and by the VAS (global p = 0.0392). We observed higher activity in August, September, and October, compared to the rest of the year, through both SELENA-SLEDAI (Figure 2C) and the serositis VAS (p = 0.0019; Figure 2D).

Renal

The renal VAS recorded renal activity. There was evidence of seasonal variation (global p = 0.0397). We observed a decrease from June through October (p = 0.0005; Figure 3A).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Lupus activity within various organ systems. A. Renal activity by visual analog scale (VAS). B. Anti-dsDNA levels measured by SELENA-SLEDAI. C. Complement levels by SELENA-SLEDAI. D. Lupus anticoagulant by dilute Russell's viper venom time. E. Raynaud's phenomenon by VAS. Values in the Y axis refer to the means of all observations at that month. Error bars represent mean ± 1 standard error.

Anti-dsDNA levels

Anti-dsDNA levels, measured by Crithidia, were assessed at each visit. We observed significant variation through the year (global p < 0.0001). There was an elevation in anti-dsDNA levels from September through November, compared to other months (p = 0.0138). There was also a striking elevation in October and November compared to the rest of the year (p < 0.0001; Figure 3B).

Low complement

C3 and C4 levels were assessed at each visit. We observed seasonal variation in the presence of low complement (global p < 0.0001; Figure 3C), with lowest levels in July.

Antiphospholipid antibodies

IgM, IgG, and IgA anticardiolipin antibodies and LAC (dRVVT) were assessed at each visit. We observed a seasonal variation in anticardiolipin IgM titer (p < 0.0001), anticardiolipin IgG (p < 0.0001), and anticardiolipin IgA (global p = 0.0101). We also observed significant variation of the LAC through the year (global p = 0.0003). Although there appeared to be a peak of LAC in September and October, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.125; Figure 3D).

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP)

RP was identified by the RP VAS. As expected, we observed a clear pattern in RP. It was evidently more frequent in cold months than in summer months (p < 0.0001; Figure 3E).

Global disease activity of SLE

Global disease activity was found by both the SELENA-SLEDAI total score and the PGA VAS. There were significant differences in SELE NA-SLEDAI scores during the various months of the year (global p = 0.0484; Figure 4A). In contrast, we did not find an association with the PGA score (global p = 0.4863; Figure 4B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A. Mean SELENA-SLEDAI. B. Mean physicians’ global assessment score by visual analog scale. C. Prevalence of bacterial infections. D. Prevalence of viral infections. Values in the Y axis for A and B refer to the means of all observations at that month. Error bars represent mean ± 1 standard error. Values in the Y axis for C and D refer to the prevalence of infections at that month.

Infections

Viral and bacterial infections were recorded at each visit. We observed a U-shaped curve, with increased prevalence of infections in colder months, with the lowest prevalence for bacterial infections in August (Figures 4C and 4D).

Seasonal variation by year or ethnicity

We divided the calendar years into 2 groups: before and after 2000. The results showed that for most of the clinical manifestations, there was no significant difference between the 2 time periods in seasonal variation in the activity of the disease. Two exceptions were found: arthritis identified by the VAS (p = 0.035) showed more seasonality in the period after 2000, and RP by VAS (p = 0.001) showed more seasonality in the period before 2000.

There was no strong evidence that seasonality of disease activity differed between whites and African Americans. The exception to this was photosensitive rash, which exhibited seasonality for whites but not for African Americans (p = 0.020 for the VAS, p = 0.007 for SELENA-SLEDAI).

DISCUSSION

Our study found a significant seasonal variation in SLE disease activity in many different organ systems. These observations suggest the possibility of seasonally related environmental factors that might affect SLE activity levels. There has been a consensus that photosensitive rashes in SLE have a clear seasonality and occur predominantly in the summer. Our results clearly confirm this, but indicate that the pattern begins in spring. This reflects the influence of ultraviolet light on photosensitive rashes6,7,8. Our results showed that photosensitive rash has a seasonal variation in whites, but not in African Americans.

Ultraviolet light exposure may exacerbate local and systemic autoimmunity by inducing changes in the expression and binding of keratinocyte autoantigens. Autoantigens cluster on the cell surface of cultured keratinocytes because of apoptotic changes from ultraviolet irradiation. The translocation of usually cell-sequestered autoantigens to the cell surface of apoptotic blebs allows circulating autoantibodies to gain access to the autoantigens. Antibody binding to the exposed antigens may lead to tissue injury by complement or inflammatory cells18,19. This is more likely to be an issue in lightly pigmented people. Melanosomes are transferred to keratinocytes and accumulate atop the cell nucleus. They protect the nuclear DNA from ionizing radiation rays. Vilá, et al reported that patients who regularly used sunscreen had significantly less renal involvement, thrombocytopenia, hospitalization, and need for cyclophosphamide than patients who did not use it20.

Joint activity has been reported to be increased in colder months8,9. In contrast, we found increased joint activity in the summer months, measured by either the SELENA-SLEDAI or the joints VAS, showing a similar trend to skin activity. This raises the hypothesis that joint activity may also be triggered by ultraviolet light exposure. This observation does not concur with previous reports6,21, which did not find high levels of activity in any other organ during the photosensitive rash months. It is interesting that joint activity, measured by both the SELENA-SLEDAI and the VAS, peaks 1 month after the skin activity.

Steup-Beekman, et al found no seasonal variation in first occurrence or in flares of CNS SLE11. We observed higher CNS activity in the fall months. This observation raises the hypothesis of an association of neuropsychiatric manifestations and infections. Similar to the observations in the neuropsychiatric manifestations, serositis activity also showed an increase in the fall.

Previous publications report an increased incidence of class V lupus nephropathy during the winter and spring9,10. Szeto, et al9 observed increased renal activity in December and January, with another peak in July and August. We observed increased renal activity from November to May.

Anticardiolipin titer levels in healthy patients have a trend similar to seasonal respiratory tract infections12. We did not observe this in our study. However, we found an increase in the LAC measured by the dRVVT in September and October. Interestingly, it peaks during the same months as infections.

There was not strong evidence of seasonality of global SLE activity shown by PGA. However, we did observe the highest global activity in April, May, and June. Hasan, et al also reported an increase in overall activity in the sunny season22. Global activity, revealed by the SELENA-SLEDAI, showed a statistically significant variation through the year, with peaks in spring and fall. The difference in global disease activity between SELENA-SLEDAI and PGA may be explained by the weighting of the SLEDAI and the inclusion of anti-dsDNA levels.

SLE is a disease with a wide range of clinical manifestations. Environmental stimuli, viral infections, genetic factors, and immunologic abnormalities have all been associated with the pathophysiology of the disease. Previous studies have shown that the number of circulating lymphocytes undergoes seasonal changes, reaching a peak in winter months23. A seasonal variation in adrenocortical function has been described, with an increase in corticosteroid secretion during the winter months24. Previous studies found seasonal variations in several autoantibodies1,25. Collier and Levin reported a seasonal variation in anti-dsDNA antibody levels, with higher levels during the winter months26. A French study also showed higher levels of anti-dsDNA and lower complement levels after July, in agreement with our results27.

We observed a similar trend in infections and renal activity. Both had a similar U-shape. Infections may be one of the triggers of renal activity, as suggested by Schlesinger, et al10.

It is important to consider that some of the inconsistencies between our study and others might be due to our large number of patients, followed for many years, yielding a very high power. It is also important to note that because of our large sample size, relatively small degrees of seasonality were statistically significant. The degree of seasonality for many of the conditions (even those with statistically significant seasonality) was relatively low, as is evident from the scales of Figures 14.

In the Hopkins Lupus Cohort, skin and joint activity are increased during the warmer months, most likely because of ultraviolet radiation exposure. Renal, serositis, and anti-dsDNA levels are increased during the colder months, possibly related to infections. This seasonality is important not just in clinical practice; it could also profoundly affect clinical trial results.

Acknowledgments

The Hopkins Lupus Cohort is supported by the National Institutes of Health R01AR043727 grant and by the National Center for Research Resources, UL1 RR 025005.

Footnotes

A. Duarte-García, MD, Research Program Coordinator; H. Fang, MD, MS, Research Program Manager, Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; C.H. To, MD, MRCP, Department of Medicine, Tuen Mun Hospital; L.S. Magder, PhD, MPH, Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine; M. Petri, MD, MPH, Professor of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Leff RL, Burgess SH, Miller FW, Love LA, Targoff IN, Dalakas MC, et al. Distinct seasonal patterns in the onset of adult idiopathic inflammatory myopathy in patients with anti-Jo-1 and anti-signal recognition particle autoantibodies. Arthritis Rheum. 1991;34:1391–6. doi: 10.1002/art.1780341108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schlesinger N, Gowin KM, Baker DG, Beutler AM, Hoffman BI, Schumacher HR., Jr Acute gouty arthritis is seasonal. J Rheumatol. 1998;25:342–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gallerani M, Govoni M, Mucinelli M, Bigoni M, Trotta F, Manfredini R. Seasonal variation in the onset of acute microcrystalline arthritis. Rheumatology. 1999;38:1003–6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/38.10.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fleming A, Crown JM, Corbett M. Early rheumatoid disease. I. Onset. Ann Rheum Dis. 1976;35:357–60. doi: 10.1136/ard.35.4.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Raynauld JP, Bloch DA, Fries JF. Seasonal variation in the onset of Wegener's granulomatosis, polyarteritis nodosa and giant cell arteritis. J Rheumatol. 1993;20:1524–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Amit M, Molad Y, Kiss S, Wysenbeek AJ. Seasonal variations in manifestations and activity of systemic lupus erythematosus. Br J Rheumatol. 1997;36:449–52. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.4.449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Haga HJ, Brun JG, Rekvig OP, Wetterberg L. Seasonal variations in activity of systemic lupus erythematosus in a subarctic region. Lupus. 1999;8:269–73. doi: 10.1191/096120399678847858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Krause I, Shraga I, Moland Y, Guedj D, Weinberger A. Seasons of the year and activity of SLE and Behçet's disease. Scand J Rheumatol. 1997;26:435–9. doi: 10.3109/03009749709065715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Szeto CC, Mok HY, Chow KM, Lee TC, Leung JY, Li EK, et al. Climatic influence on the prevalence of noncutaneous disease flare in systemic lupus erythematosus in Hong Kong. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:1031–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schlesinger N, Schlesinger M, Seshan SV. Seasonal variation of lupus nephritis: high prevalence of class V nephritis during winter and spring. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:1053–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Steup-Beekman GM, Gahrmann BM, Steens SC, van Buchem MA, Huizinga TW. Seasonal variation of primary neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:1913–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Luong TH, Rand JH, Wu XX, Godbold JH, Gascon-Lema M, Tuhrim S. Seasonal distribution of antiphospholipid antibodies. Stroke. 2001;32:1707–11. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.8.1707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40:1725. doi: 10.1002/art.1780400928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, Masi AT, McShane DJ, Rothfield NF, et al. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1982;25:1271–7. doi: 10.1002/art.1780251101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Petri M, Kim MY, Kalunian KC, Grossman J, Hahn BH, Sammaritano LR, et al. OC-SELENA Trial Combined oral contraceptives in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2550–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Petri M, Hellmann D, Hochberg M. Validity and reliability of lupus activity measures in the routine clinic setting. J Rheumatol. 1992;19:53–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wollaston SJ, Farewell VT, Isenberg DA, Gordon C, Merrill JT, Petri MA, et al. Defining response in systemic lupus erythematosus: A study by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics group. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:2390–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Casciola-Rosen LA, Anhalt G, Rosen A. Autoantigens targeted in systemic lupus erythematosus are clustered in two populations of surface structures on apoptotic keratinocytes. J Exp Med. 1994;179:1317–30. doi: 10.1084/jem.179.4.1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Casciola-Rosen L, Rosen A. Ultraviolet light-induced keratinocyte apoptosis: A potential mechanism for the induction of skin lesions and autoantibody production in LE. Lupus. 1997;6:175–80. doi: 10.1177/096120339700600213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vilá LM, Mayor AM, Valentín AH, Rodríguez SI, Reyes ML, Acosta E, et al. Association of sunlight exposure and photoprotection measures with clinical outcome in systemic lupus erythematosus. P R Health Sci J. 1999;18:89–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wysenbeek AJ, Block DA, Fries JF. Prevalence and expression of photosensitivity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989;48:461–3. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.6.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hasan T, Pertovaara M, Yli-Kerttula U, Luukkaala T, Korpela M. Seasonal variation of disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus in Finland: A 1 year follow up study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1498–500. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.012740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Boctor FN, Charmy RA, Cooper EL. Seasonal differences in the rhythmicity of human male and female lymphocyte blastogenic responses. Immunol Invest. 1989;18:775–84. doi: 10.3109/08820138909030598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.MacMurray JP, Barker JP, Armstrong JD, Bozzetti LP, Kuhn IN. Circannual changes in immune function. Life Sci. 1983;32:2363–70. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(83)90767-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Samuelsson U, Ludvigsson J, Bottazzo GF, Adolfsson S, Cacciari E, Chiumello G, et al. Islet cell surface antibodies are more common in patients and relatives in areas and during seasons with high incidence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Res. 1996;40:695–701. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199611000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Collier DH, Levin MJ. Significantly abnormal anti-double stranded DNA (anti-DNA) levels have seasonal variation [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum. 1987;30:S87. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Léone J, Pennaforte JL, Delhinger V, Detour J, Lefondre K, Eschard JP, et al. Influence of seasons on risk of flare-up of systemic lupus: Retrospective study of 66 patients. Rev Med Interne. 1997;18:286–91. doi: 10.1016/s0248-8663(97)84013-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES